Skip to main content
JSES Open Access logoLink to JSES Open Access
. 2019 Sep 16;3(3):194–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.010

The effect of age on short-term postoperative complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Ajay S Padaki 1, Venkat Boddapati 1, Justin Mathew 1, Christopher S Ahmad 1, Charles M Jobin 1, William N Levine 1,
PMCID: PMC6835001  PMID: 31709361

Abstract

Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to assess short-term outcomes, including the rates of medical complications, non-home discharge, overnight hospital stay, and 30-day readmission, associated with patient age at the time of rotator cuff repair.

Methods

This study used National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2005 to 2016 to analyze patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Patients were stratified into age cohorts of younger than 55 years, between 55 and 65 years, or older than 65 years. Outcomes including postoperative complications, discharge destination, and readmission were compared between the age cohorts using multivariate analysis.

Results

We identified 23,974 patients undergoing ARCR: 8344 patients (34.8%) were younger than 55 years, 9166 (38.4%) were aged between 55 and 65 years, and 6434 (26.8%) were older than 65 years. Older patients were more likely to be female patients and to have a lower body mass index, more medical comorbidities, shorter operative duration, dependent functional status, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Patients older than 65 years had a higher rate of total complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.99; P = .003), respiratory complications (OR, 2.99; P = .023), urinary tract infections (OR, 6.94; P < .001), overnight hospital stay (OR, 1.49; P < .001), and unplanned hospital readmission (OR, 1.50; P = .040) relative to patients younger than 55 years. There was no increase in complication rates for patients aged between 55 and 65 years.

Conclusions

Patients older than 65 years have nearly double the odds of having a postoperative complication following ARCR and nearly 3 and 6 times the odds of having a respiratory complication and a urinary tract complication, respectively. Thorough preoperative optimization, including respiratory and urinary care, may be able to decrease complications in select, high-risk patients.

Keywords: Rotator cuff repair outcomes, complications, ACS-NSQIP, rotator cuff repair age, arthroscopy, adverse events


The incidence of rotator cuff disease in the United States continues to increase, and it represents one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions treated by orthopedic surgeons.6, 31 The volume of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has increased dramatically in the past 2 decades, and the majority of surgical procedures are now performed arthroscopically.10, 30 Long-term studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ARCR in significantly improving pain, range of motion, and patient-related outcome measures.17, 23

ARCR is performed almost exclusively as an outpatient procedure, with cost-effective analyses supporting this practice.8, 18 Repairs are commonly performed safely in elderly populations with multiple comorbidities including diabetes and hypertension.9 Despite an elderly population, complications in the perioperative period have been shown to occur at a rate of approximately 1% to 2% and include but are not limited to rerupture, surgical-site infection, and unplanned readmission.1, 22 Investigations to identify relevant factors for increased risk have demonstrated open rotator cuff repair to significantly increase perioperative risk relative to arthroscopic repair.13, 24

As the incidence of ARCR continues to rise dramatically with the aging population, minimizing complications to both protect patients and decrease health care costs is important. To this end, the use of multicenter databases may help stratify patients most at risk of complications.7, 16 Specifically, elderly patients undergoing shoulder surgery have been found to be at increased risk of perioperative complications and readmission.26, 29 Although prior investigations have studied perioperative ARCR complications, none have stratified postoperative complications respective to patient age cohorts.15, 20 As ARCR is increasingly performed in an aging population, understanding the complication profile of patients in older cohorts is important for risk stratification and patient counseling.

By use of a multicenter registry, the purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patient age on short-term complications, overnight hospital stay, and unplanned hospital readmission regarding ARCR. We hypothesized that patients older than 65 years would have increased rates of short-term complications and unplanned hospital readmission.

Materials and methods

This study was a retrospective cohort study of using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) data from 2005 to 2016. This registry has aggregated patient data from over 600 participating sites as of 2016. These sites range from community hospitals to academic medical centers. Trained surgical clinical reviewers manually enter data into this registry, and all data are also periodically audited to ensure accuracy.12, 27 All data are deidentified prior to dissemination. ACS-NSQIP data have been used previously to assess perioperative complications after a variety of orthopedic procedures, including shoulder arthroscopic procedures.2, 3, 4

All patients undergoing ARCR were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 29827. Patients were excluded if their surgical procedure was considered emergent, an unclean wound classification was noted, baseline demographic characteristics were missing, or the ARCR was performed in conjunction with another open shoulder procedure (eg, total shoulder arthroplasty). Once eligible patients were identified, the entire sample was split into 3 cohorts based on age: younger than 55 years, between 55 and 65 years, and older than 65 years. These age range brackets were selected to remain consistent with prior rotator cuff cohort literature.19

The baseline patient characteristics assessed included patient sex, body mass index (calculated from patient height and weight and stratified according to the World Health Organization classification system), type of anesthesia used (general vs. regional), operative duration, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, functional status (dependent vs. independent), and medical comorbidities including a history of diabetes mellitus, cigarette use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and preoperative corticosteroid use.

Bivariate analysis using the Pearson χ2 test was performed to compare baseline patient characteristics as well as 30-day outcomes. Outcome variables found to be statistically different by age on bivariate analysis were carried forward to a multivariate analysis. All baseline patient characteristics with P > .20 on bivariate analysis were adjusted for in the multivariate models. Independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients older than 65 years were identified using a multivariate regression with selected outcomes as the outcome variables and baseline patient characteristics as covariates. All statistical analyses in this study were performed using SPSS software (version 25; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

In total, 23,974 patients undergoing ARCR were identified in this study. Of these patients, 8344 (34.8%) were younger than 55 years, 9196 (38.4%) were aged between 55 and 65 years, and 6434 (26.8%) were older than 65 years (Table I). As patient age increased, patients were more likely to be female patients; to have a lower body mass index, shorter operative duration, dependent functional status, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class; and to have a medical history of diabetes mellitus, cigarette use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and preoperative corticosteroid use (P < .001 for all comparisons).

Table I.

Comparison of baseline patient characteristics in rotator cuff repair patients by age

All patients Age group
P value
<55 yr 55-65 yr >65 yr
n 23,974 8344 9196 6434
Female, % 41.8 37.8 42.4 46.0 <.001
BMI, % <.001
 Non-obese (<30 kg/m2) 53.7 50.8 51.8 60.3
 Obese I (30-34.9 kg/m2) 26.3 27.0 26.6 25.0
 Obese II (35-39.9 kg/m2) 12.2 12.8 13.0 10.0
 Obese III (≥40 kg/m2) 7.8 9.4 8.6 4.7
Comorbidities, %
 Diabetes mellitus 15.1 9.7 17.1 19.1 <.001
 Smoking history 15.4 22.7 14.7 7.1 <.001
 COPD 3.0 1.6 2.9 5.1 <.001
 Hypertension 45.7 27.7 49.2 63.9 <.001
 Preoperative corticosteroid use 1.8 1.3 1.9 2.3 <.001
Anesthesia type, % .541
 General 92.4 92.5 92.2 92.6
 Regional 7.6 7.5 7.8 7.4
Operative duration, % <.001
 <60 min 25.3 25.3 24.9 25.8
 60-120 min 56.6 55.7 56.5 58.1
 >120 min 18.1 19.0 18.6 16.1
Dependent functional status, % 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.8 <.001
ASA class, % <.001
 I 68.6 81.0 67.5 54.1
 II 30.5 18.5 31.7 44.3
 III or IV 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.6

BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Statistically significant, defined as P < .05.

On bivariate analysis, an increased rate of any complication was found as age increased, increasing from 0.46% in patients younger than 55 years to 0.52% in those aged between 55 and 65 years and 1.13% in those older than 65 years (P < .001) (Table II). This difference was also found on multivariate analysis when we compared patients older than 65 years vs. those younger than 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.99; P < .003). Similarly, we found increased rates of death (P = .005), cardiac complications (P = .002), respiratory complications (P = .002), urinary tract infections (P < .001), non-home discharge to an acute or subacute care facility (P = .001), overnight hospital stay (P < .001), and 30-day unplanned hospital readmission (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, patients older than 65 years relative to those younger than 55 years had increased rates of respiratory complications (OR, 2.99; P = .023), urinary tract infections (OR, 6.94; P = .001), overnight hospital stay (OR, 1.49; P < .001), and unplanned 30-day hospital readmission (OR, 1.50; P = .040).

Table II.

Comparison of adverse outcomes after rotator cuff repair by age

Age group, %
Bivariate analysis: P value Multivariate analysis
<55 yr (n = 8344) 55-65 yr (n = 9196) >65 yr (n = 6434) 55-65 yr vs. <55 yr
>65 yr vs. <55 yr
OR P value OR P value
Any complication 0.46 0.52 1.13 <.001 0.95 .825 1.99 .003
 Death 0.00 0.00 0.08 .005
 Cardiac complications 0.02 0.04 0.15 .002 1.70 .654 5.25 .152
 Renal complications 0.01 0.01 0.03 .578 0.45 .607 2.75 .461
 Respiratory complications 0.10 0.12 0.31 .002 0.85 .736 2.99 .023
 Deep vein thrombosis 0.11 0.13 0.17 .338 1.35 .516 1.56 .399
 Stroke or cerebrovascular accident 0.00 0.01 0.06 .083
 Sepsis 0.02 0.01 0.02 .968 0.69 .799 2.21 .631
 Surgical-site infection 0.19 0.10 0.12 .232 0.41 .053 0.61 .323
 Urinary tract infection 0.05 0.12 0.42 <.001 2.08 .227 6.94 .001
 Wound dehiscence 0.01 0.00 0.00 .544
Non-home discharge 0.52 0.40 0.85 .001 6.44 .074 0.85 .523
Overnight hospital stay 7.06 9.32 11.87 <.001 1.12 .001 1.49 <.001
Blood transfusion 0.02 0.01 0.06 .253 0.67 .786 0.67 .777
30-d readmission 0.78 0.99 1.55 <.001 1.08 .655 1.50 .040

OR, odds ratio.

Statistically significant, defined as P < .05.

When patients older than 65 years were isolated and selected complications (any complication, respiratory complications, and urinary tract infections) were used as the outcome variables, the only baseline patient characteristic that was predictive of these adverse outcomes was dependent functional status (Table III). Dependent functional status was independently predictive of both aggregate complications (OR, 8.98; P < .001) and urinary tract infections (OR, 1.50; P = .002).

Table III.

Independent risk factors for adverse outcomes by multivariate logistic regression in patients older than 65 years undergoing rotator cuff repair

Variable Any complication
Respiratory complications
Urinary infection
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Female sex 1.24 (0.78-1.99) .368 0.58 (0.23-1.49) .257 3.19 (1.33-7.61) .009
BMI
 Non-obese (<30 kg/m2) Reference Reference Reference
 Obese I (30-34.9 kg/m2) 1.20 (0.69-2.10) .524 4.60 (1.53-13.85) .007 0.67 (0.24-1.83) .433
 Obese II (35-39.9 kg/m2) 1.36 (0.64-2.89) .425 4.89 (1.24-19.38) .024 0.31 (0.04-2.40) .264
 Obese III (≥40 kg/m2) 1.68 (0.68-4.18) .265 2.38 (0.26-21.67) .442 1.81 (0.50-6.59) .366
Comorbidities
 Diabetes mellitus 1.05 (0.59-1.89) .866 1.22 (0.44-3.43) .703 0.64 (0.21-1.97) .438
 Current smoker 0.96 (0.38-2.42) .925 1.87 (0.52-6.76) .339 1.27 (0.30-5.48) .745
 COPD 1.92 (0.87-4.23) .104 3.49 (1.04-11.72) .043 0.58 (0.08-4.45) .599
 Hypertension 1.23 (0.72-2.18) .451 0.84 (0.30-2.34) .735 1.83 (0.75-4.50) .186
 Preoperative corticosteroid use 1.21 (0.29-5.02) .794 1.79 (0.24-13.53) .571
Dependent functional status 8.98 (3.30-24.44) <.001 6.11 (0.69-54.24) .104 11.50 (2.50-52.74) .002
ASA class
 I Reference Reference Reference
 II 0.99 (0.59-1.66) .976 1.07 (0.39-2.90) .897 0.91 (0.40-2.09) .828
 III or IV 0.94 (0.20-4.43) .938 1.51 (0.14-16.10) .734

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Statistically significant, defined as P < .0042 after Bonferroni correction.

Discussion

Using a national, collected registry including over 20,000 patients who underwent an ARCR, we found age older than 65 years to be a significant independent risk factor for perioperative complications. Patients older than 65 years had approximately twice the OR of patients younger than 55 years of experiencing any complication. This included a significantly increased risk of pulmonary complications, urinary tract infections, overnight admission, and unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days.

Although increased age has previously been associated with perioperative risk in shoulder arthroscopy,21 the specific impact on patients undergoing ARCR has not been clearly established. The results of our study indicate that although elderly patients are at increased risk of all complications, they are particularly at risk of urinary and pulmonary complications. Those elderly patients at the most significant risk appear to be those who are dependent in their functional status. Bohl et al5 demonstrated that an increased surgical time of just 15 minutes significantly increases the risk of urinary tract infections and readmission in total joint arthroplasty patients. Although the length of surgery was not the primary outcome of this study, these results indicate that retention and urinary symptoms should be closely assessed following shoulder arthroscopy and that minimizing operative time may benefit all patients but particularly elderly patients. Our results emphasize the importance of appropriately screening patients, considering preoperative dependent functional status as an independent risk factor, and optimizing patients’ urinary and respiratory status prior to surgery to minimize the risk of perioperative complications. Beyond standardized preoperative clearance, a subset of dependent patients may benefit from more advanced optimization. Specifically, a potentially modified clearance protocol may be necessary to best treat dependent patients, in whom complications occurred almost an order of magnitude more frequently than in independent patients. Further research and collaboration with medical colleagues, however, will be necessary to provide better insight.

Various surgical procedures have been associated with a significantly higher complication rate in older patients. Daubs et al,11 for instance, noted that patients older than 69 years had significantly more complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. Readmission rates have also previously been found to be increased in older patients, as underscored by 1 study examining complications and readmissions in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.14 Some studies have attributed increased readmission rates for those patients older than 65 years to factors including the quantity and complexity of discharge medication regimens, as well as socioeconomic status.25, 28 Thus, the current literature is corroborated by our study’s conclusions that increased age correlates with a higher rate of postoperative complications.

This study has several limitations. The ACS-NSQIP registry only collects outcome data for the first 30 days following surgery. Therefore, longer-term results were unable to be assessed. In addition, shoulder-specific outcome measures are not included in the ACS-NSQIP registry. The ACS-NSQIP registry also does not provide psychiatric diagnoses, socioeconomic status, frequency of emergency department presentation, or discharge medications. Another limitation of this study is that the causes of overnight admissions were not recorded, preventing us from further analyzing these unplanned admissions. Although the ACS-NSQIP registry includes over 600 centers, freestanding ambulatory surgery centers not associated with larger medical centers are excluded; therefore, the representative population may differ from the general population as a whole. Cases performed at ambulatory surgery centers that are associated with a member institution are included in our study. Despite these limitations, this investigation of approximately 24,000 rotator cuff repairs represents the largest study to date assessing short-term outcomes after ARCR as a function of patient age.

Conclusion

As quality metrics increasingly impact orthopedic practice, the importance of risk stratifying patients to minimize complications has become paramount. This study demonstrates that older patients (ie, aged > 65 years) undergoing ARCR, especially those with dependent functional status, are at increased risk of perioperative complications. Furthermore, prospective research assessing pulmonary and urinary function via specialist preoperative clearance and optimization in select patients may be able to decrease overall complications and improve outcomes.

Disclaimer

Christopher S. Ahmad receives royalties from and is a paid consultant for Arthrex. He receives research support from Major League Baseball and Stryker. This is not directly related to the subject of this work.

Charles M. Jobin is a paid consultant for Zimmer Biomet, Acumed, Tornier, and DePuy. This is not directly related to the subject of this work.

William N. Levine is an unpaid consultant for Zimmer Biomet and receives research support from Smith & Nephew. This is not directly related to the subject of this work.

The other authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Footnotes

Institutional review board approval was not required for this retrospective treatment study.

References

  • 1.Baker D.K., Perez J.L., Watson S.L., McGwin G., Brabston E.W., Hudson P.W. Arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: which has a better complication and 30-day readmission profile? Arthroscopy. 2017;33:1764–1769. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boddapati V., Fu M.C., Mayman D.J., Su E.P., Sculco P.K., McLawhorn A.S. Revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality relative to noninfectious revisions. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:521–526. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boddapati V., Fu M.C., Schairer W., Gulotta L.V., Dines D.M., Dines J.S. Revision total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with increased thirty-day postoperative complications and wound infections relative to primary total shoulder arthroplasty. HSS J. 2018;14:23–28. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9573-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boddapati V., Fu M.C., Schairer W.W., Ranawat A.S., Dines D.M., Taylor S.A. Increased shoulder arthroscopy time is associated with overnight hospital stay and surgical site infection. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bohl D.D., Ondeck N.T., Darrith B., Hannon C., Fillingham Y.A., Della Valle A.G. Impact of operative time on adverse events following primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2256–2262.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boissonnault W.G., Badke M.B., Wooden M.J., Ekedahl S., Fly K. Patient outcome following rehabilitation for rotator cuff repair surgery: the impact of selected medical comorbidities. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37:312–319. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bokshan S.L., DeFroda S.F., Owens B.D. Comparison of 30-day morbidity and mortality after arthroscopic Bankart, open Bankart, and Latarjet-Bristow procedures: a review of 2864 cases. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5 doi: 10.1177/2325967117713163. 2325967117713163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burkhart S.S., Lo I.K. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:333–346. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200606000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cho N.S., Moon S.C., Jeon J.W., Rhee Y.G. The influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:991–997. doi: 10.1177/0363546514565097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Colvin A.C., Egorova N., Harrison A.K., Moskowitz A., Flatow E.L. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:227–233. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daubs M.D., Lenke L.G., Cheh G., Stobbs G., Bridwell K.H. Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine. 2007;32:2238–2244. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf24a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davenport D.L., Holsapple C.W., Conigliaro J. Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24:395–402. doi: 10.1177/1062860609339936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Day M., Westermann R., Duchman K., Gao Y., Pugely A., Bollier M. Comparison of short-term complications after rotator cuff repair: open versus arthroscopic. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:1130–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eckman W.W., Hester L., McMillen M. Same-day discharge after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a series of 808 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1806–1812. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3366-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heyer J.H., Kuang X., Amdur R.L., Pandarinath R. Identifiable risk factors for thirty-day complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Phys Sportsmed. 2018;46:56–60. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1388732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hill J.R., McKnight B., Pannell W.C., Heckmann N., Sivasundaram L., Mostofi A. Risk factors for 30-day readmission following shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Horneff J.G., 3rd, Tjoumakaris F., Wowkanech C., Pepe M.D., Tucker B., Austin L.S. Long-term correction in sleep disturbance is sustained after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1670–1675. doi: 10.1177/0363546517692551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Iyengar J.J., Samagh S.P., Schairer W., Singh G., Valone F.H., III, Feeley B.T. Current trends in rotator cuff repair: surgical technique, setting, and cost. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:284–288. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim H.M., Caldwell J.M., Buza J.A., Fink L.A., Ahmad C.S., Bigliani L.U. Factors affecting satisfaction and shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator cuff tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:106–112. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kosinski L.R., Gil J.A., Durand W.M., DeFroda S.F., Owens B.D., Daniels A.H. 30-Day readmission following outpatient rotator cuff repair: an analysis of 18,061 cases. Phys Sportsmed. 2018;46:466–470. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1502571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martin C.T., Gao Y., Pugely A.J., Wolf B.R. 30-day morbidity and mortality after elective shoulder arthroscopy: a review of 9410 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:1667–1675.e1661. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Owens B.D., Williams A.E., Wolf J.M. Risk factors for surgical complications in rotator cuff repair in a veteran population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:1707–1712. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paxton E.S., Teefey S.A., Dahiya N., Keener J.D., Yamaguchi K., Galatz L.M. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of failed repairs of large or massive rotator cuff tears: minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:627–632. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schairer W.W., Nwachukwu B.U., Fu M.C., Warren R.F. Risk factors for short-term complications after rotator cuff repair in the United States. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:1158–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shebehe J., Hansson A. High hospital readmission rates for patients aged >/=65 years associated with low socioeconomic status in a Swedish region: a cross-sectional study in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36:300–307. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1499584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shields E., Iannuzzi jC., Thorsness R., Noyes K., Voloshin I. Postoperative morbidity by procedure and patient factors influencing major complications within 30 days following shoulder surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2 doi: 10.1177/2325967114553164. 2325967114553164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shiloach M., Frencher J.r., SK, Steeger J.E., Rowell K.S., Bartzokis K., Tomeh M.G. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tesfaye W.H., Peterson G.M., Castelino R.L., McKercher C., Jose M.D., Wimmer B.C. Medication regimen complexity and hospital readmission in older adults with chronic kidney disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2019;53:28–34. doi: 10.1177/1060028018793419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Westermann R.W., Anthony C.A., Duchman K.R., Pugely A.J., Gao Y., Hettrich C.M. Incidence, causes and predictors of 30-day readmission after shoulder arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop J. 2016;36:70–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yamaguchi K., Ball C.M., Galatz L.M. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: transition from mini-open to all-arthroscopic. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001:83–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang A.L., Montgomery S.R., Ngo S.S., Hame S.L., Wang J.C., Gamradt S.C. Analysis of rotator cuff repair trends in a large private insurance population. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:623–629. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JSES Open Access are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES