The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]:
-
(1)
In the result section replace:
On page 6, in the text of the Section 3.1, ‘22.2 (20.9–23.8),’ must be replaced by ‘1.31 (1.26–1.37).’
On page 7, in the text of the Section 3.2, (r = −0.42, p < 0.001)’, ’CI (r = −0.46, p < 0.001)’ and ’CI (r = −0.44, p < 0.001)’, must be replaced by (r = 0.38, p < 0.001)’, ’CI (r = 0.31, p < 0.001)’ and ’CI (r = 0.41, p < 0.001)’.
On page 9, in the text of the Section 3.3, ‘22.9’and ‘21.0,’ must be replaced by ‘1.33’and ’1.31’.
On page 10, in the text of the Section 3.4, ‘10.9,’ must be replaced by ’12.8’.
-
(2)
In Table 1 replace:
On page 6, Section 3.1, Table 1, ’22.2 (20.9–23.8)’, ’22.2 (20.9–23.8)’ and ’22.2 (20.9–23.8)’, must be replaced by ’1.31 (1.26–1.37)’, ’1.34 (1.29–1.39)’, ’1.30 (1.24–1.35)’.
-
(3)
In Figure 1 replace:
On page 8, Section 3.2, Figure 1, Panel CI-CMRI, must be replaced by:
-
(4)
In Table 2 replace:
On page 9, Section 3.3, Table 2, ’22.9’ and ’21.0’, must be replaced by ’1.33’, and ’1.30’.
These changes have no material impact on the conclusions of our paper. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage. The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Author Contributions
R.R.-V. and M.Á.P.S. analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the text.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Reference
- 1.Ramírez-Vélez R., Pérez-Sousa M.Á., Izquierdo M., Cano-Gutierrez C.A., González-Jiménez E., Schmidt-RioValle J., González-Ruíz K., Correa-Rodríguez M. Validation of Surrogate Anthropometric Indices in Older Adults: What Is the Best Indicator of High Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering? Nutrients. 2019;11:1701. doi: 10.3390/nu11081701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]