Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2018 Apr 12;23(15):17-00240. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.15.17-00240

People living with undiagnosed HIV infection and a low CD4 count: estimates from surveillance data, Italy, 2012 to 2014

Vincenza Regine 1, Maria Dorrucci 1, Patrizio Pezzotti 1, Alessia Mammone 2, Chantal Quinten 3, Anastasia Pharris 3, Barbara Suligoi 1; the regional representatives of the National HIV Surveillance System4
PMCID: PMC6836199  PMID: 29667577

Abstract

Background and aims

Late HIV diagnosis is associated with onward HIV transmission, higher morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In Italy, more than half of people living with HIV were diagnosed late during the last decade, with a CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3 at diagnosis. We aimed to determine the number and characteristics of people living with undiagnosed HIV infection and low CD4 counts in Italy.

Methods

Data on newly reported HIV diagnoses from 2012 –2014 were obtained from the national HIV surveillance system. We used the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control HIV modelling tool to calculate the undiagnosed prevalence and yearly diagnosed fraction (YDF) in people with low CD4 count.

Results

The estimated annual number undiagnosed HIV infections with low CD4 count was on average 6,028 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4,954–8,043) from 2012–2014. In 2014, most of the undiagnosed people with low CD4 count were men (82.8%), a third acquired HIV through sex between men (MSM) (35.0%), and heterosexual transmission (33.4%), respectively. The prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection was 11.3 (95% CI: 9.3–14.9) per 100,000 residents ranging from 0.7 to 20.8 between Italian regions. Nationally the prevalence rate was 280.4 (95% CI: 173.3–450.2) per 100,000 MSM, 8.3 (95% CI: 4.9–13.6) per 100,000 heterosexual men, and 3.0 (95% CI: 1.4–5.6) per 100,000 women. The YDF was highest among heterosexual women (27.1%; 95% CI: 16.9–45.2%).

Conclusions

These findings highlight the importance of improving efforts to identify undiagnosed HIV infections primarily among men, both MSM and heterosexual men.

Keywords: HIV infection, surveillance data, undiagnosed HIV infection, low CD4 count, modelling

Introduction

Late diagnosis of HIV remains a major public health concern worldwide [1-3]. In 2015, close to half (48%) of people newly diagnosed with HIV in European countries were late presenters, with CD4 counts below 350 cells/mm3 at diagnosis, including 28% with advanced HIV infection (CD4 < 200 cells/mm3) [1]. In Italy, despite HIV testing and healthcare being free of cost for the individual, more than half of the ca 4,000 people diagnosed with HIV annually are diagnosed with a CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3, and ca 40% are at the symptomatic stage of infection when diagnosed [4,5].

The late diagnosis of HIV infection has negative consequences, both at the individual and population levels. People presenting late respond insufficiently to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and treating them is often complex and costly. Individuals who are in an advanced stage of immunosuppression due to HIV are at high risk of clinical events and death [6,7]. At population level, those diagnosed late are a potential source of HIV transmission for a considerable period [8]. Low CD4 count and high viral load contribute significantly to the risk of sexual transmission [9].

Given the prevalence of late diagnoses, it is likely that a considerable number of people with low CD4 counts remain undiagnosed in Italy. Mammone et al. estimated that there are 12,000–18,000 undiagnosed people living with HIV in Italy [10], although no estimate of those undiagnosed with a low CD4 count was calculated. Knowing the numbers of people living with undiagnosed HIV and with a low CD4 count could be useful in predicting the prevalence of late HIV presentation and its consequences of poor prognosis and onward transmission. Being aware of the overall numbers of those who are undiagnosed and of the respective numbers in relevant subpopulations can support the monitoring of national and local HIV prevention strategies, the revision of health policies and the allocation of economic resources to prevention and control efforts [11].

The aim of this study was to estimate the number of people living with undiagnosed HIV and a low CD4 count in Italy, to analyse the characteristics of this population and to evaluate the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection in the general population.

Methods

To estimate the number of people living with undiagnosed HIV and a low CD4 count, we applied the model proposed by Lodwick et al. [12]. This model is part of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) HIV modelling tool. The tool uses routine surveillance data to calculate estimates of the number of people living with HIV as well as of those not yet diagnosed. It does not depend on historical data, i.e. it can be used even with limited years of available data [13]. Of the two models included we choose the London model as it applies to the way HIV data was collected through the Italian HIV surveillance system effective as of 2012.

Data source

We obtained data from the Italian National HIV Surveillance system (INHS) on people aged > 15 years who were diagnosed with HIV between 2012 and 2014 and reported to the INHS by June 2015 [5].

In Italy, the reporting of new HIV diagnoses is mandatory since July 2008 for all clinicians [14]. There are 173 Infectious Diseases Centers (IDC) in Italy that offer free monitoring and health management to all HIV-positive persons, including non-nationals and undocumented migrants [15]. Most people who test HIV-positive are diagnosed at IDCs directly and those who are tested in other health facilities are further referred to an IDC for confirmatory testing and diagnosis.

Data on new diagnoses are collected by regional surveillance systems and sent annually to the INHS coordinated by the Italian national institute of health in Rome. While the surveillance did not cover all regions previously, since 2012 there was 100% geographical coverage with all regions reporting data to the INHS [5].

The INHS collects the following data on an annual basis: (i) demographic data (age, sex, nationality, geographical area of diagnosis, and geographical area of residence), (ii) clinical information (clinical stage, CD4 counts, and viral load) and (iii) HIV exposure group data (people who inject drugs (PWID), heterosexual women, heterosexual men, men who have sex with men (MSM), and other/not available) [5].

Residences in Italy were grouped into three areas based on the of Italian National Bureau of Statistics (ISTAT) classification: (i) North (Piemonte, Valle d’Aosta, Liguria, Lombardia, Trentino–Alto Adige, Friuli–Venezia Giulia, Veneto and Emilia Romagna); (ii) Central (Toscana, Marche, Lazio, and Umbria); and (iii) South (Abruzzo, Molise, Campania, Puglia, Calabria, Basilicata, Sicilia, and Sardegna) [16]. For non-Italian citizens without residence in Italy, we assigned the place of diagnosis as residence.

Description of the model

The model proposed by Lodwick et al. [12] is based on back-calculation principles. In brief, the method assumes that people living with undiagnosed HIV develop AIDS or other HIV-related symptoms of sufficient severity, or symptoms which are sufficiently specific to HIV, and will seek care and, as a result, be diagnosed with HIV. It uses information derived from people newly diagnosed at an advanced stage of HIV infection (clinical stage B or clinical stage C) with CD4 counts < 350 cells/mm3, stratified into eight groups based on CD4 counts at HIV diagnosis (< 20, 20–49, 50–99, 100–149, 150–199, 200–249, 250–299, 300–350). Specifically, for each CD4 count stratum the number of those undiagnosed is obtained by dividing the number of symptomatic diagnoses by the CD4-specific rate of HIV symptoms estimated in cohort studies. The total number of undiagnosed people with HIV with a CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3 (advanced HIV infection) was obtained summing the specific stratum estimates, from the first (< 20 cells/mm3) to the fifth (150–199 cells/mm3) stratum. Similarly, the total number of undiagnosed people with HIV with a CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3 (late presenters) was obtained summing the eight specific stratum estimates.

The ECDC HIV modelling tool version 1.2.1 [13] was used to calculate the estimates stratified by main demographic characteristics (age, sex, nationality, geographical area of residence) and HIV exposure groups (PWID, heterosexual women, heterosexual men, MSM, and other/not available). The tool permits the estimation of undiagnosed people living with HIV according to the different characteristics.

Adjustment for missing values and reporting delay

The estimates obtained from the model were adjusted for reporting delays or underreporting of HIV diagnoses with HIV-related symptoms as proposed in the original publication [12]. As information on clinical stage and CD4 count were missing in around 30% of the INHS records, the missing values were adjusted under the assumption that the distribution of clinical stage and CD4 count among diagnosed cases with missing data was similar to that of diagnosed cases with available data [17]. In brief, the estimates obtained from the London method were divided by the proportion of all diagnoses with symptoms, where the CD4 count was known.

The following steps were used for the adjustment: first, the proportion of missing data was calculated relative to the clinical stage and CD4 count for each characteristic of the new diagnoses. Second, the estimates of undiagnosed people living with HIV were multiplied by the inverse of the missing proportion according to each characteristic. Last, the reporting delay to the INHS was considered, with the adjusting of the annual estimates by a reporting delay of 5%, introduced for each year of the 3 years, given that all new HIV diagnoses were notified to the surveillance system within 3 years after diagnosis [5]. In other words, it was assumed that in 2015 the INHS data were all complete for 2012 (100%), and almost complete for 2013 (95%) and 2014 (90%). Therefore, for each characteristic we adjusted the estimates multiplying them by the following:

 Adjustment factor =1(1  proportion of missing  annual reporting delay)

Table 1 shows the proportion of missing data (of CD4 count and/or clinical stage) with the respective ‘adjustment factors’ applied to undiagnosed people living with HIV estimates by main characteristics. As an example, when estimating the undiagnosed number of women, missing CD4 count and clinical stage accounted for 27% in 2012, 29% in 2013, and 26% in 2014 of the cases. The adjustment factors for women were: 1/(1 - 0.27) = 1.37; 1/(1 - 0.29 - 0.05) = 1.52 and 1/(1 - 0.26 - 0.05 - 0.05) = 1.56 in the 3 years, respectively. Of note, there was a direct relationship between the proportions of missing data and the value of the adjustment factors: the higher the adjustment factor, the higher the proportion of missing data (Table 1).

Table 1. CD4 count and/or clinical stage missing value proportions for HIV diagnoses and adjustment factors by specific stratum estimate for undiagnosed people living with HIV by year, Italy, 2012–2014.

2012 2013 2014
Missing values for CD4 count or clinical stage (%) Adjustmenta factor Missing values for CD4 count or clinical stage (%) Adjustmenta factor Missing values for CD4 count or clinical stage (%) Adjustmenta factor
Total diagnosesb 29 1.40 30 1.55 29 1.64
Sex
Women 27 1.37 29 1.52 26 1.56
Men 29 1.41 31 1.56 30 1.66
Age group (years)
15–24 38 1.61 33 1.60 28 1.61
25–34 33 1.49 34 1.63 34 1.78
35–44 26 1.36 29 1.52 28 1.61
45–54 24 1.31 29 1.52 27 1.59
≥ 55 24 1.32 26 1.44 25 1.53
HIV exposure group
PWID 18 1.23 23 1.39 21 1.46
Heterosexual women 23 1.31 25 1.42 22 1.47
Heterosexual men 25 1.34 28 1.48 29 1.64
MSM 27 1.36 26 1.46 24 1.52
Other/NA 51 2.02 64% 3.25 60 3.36
Nationality
Italian 27 1.37 28 1.48 27 1.58
Non-Italian 34 1.51 39 1.79 35 1.83
Geographical areac
Northd 22 1.27 24 1.41 23 1.48
Centrale 62 2.60 60 2.86 59 3.24
South 3 1.03 5 1.11 3 1.14

NA: not available; MSM: men who have sex with men; PWID: people who inject drugs.

a Adjustment factors were calculated as follows = 1 / (1 - proportion of missing - annual reporting delay).

b Missing values for CD4 count in 2012 were 21.7% and for clinical stage 28.2%; missing values for CD4 count in 2013 were 21.8% and for clinical stage 30.1%; missing values for CD4 count in 2014 were 22.2% and for clinical stage 28.6%.

c North area includes: Piemonte, Valle d’Aosta, Liguria, Lombardia, Trentino– Alto Adige, Friuli–Venezia Giulia, Veneto, Emilia Romagna; Central area includes: Toscana, Marche, Lazio, Umbria; South area includes: Abruzzo, Molise, Campania, Puglia, Calabria, Basilicata, Sicilia, Sardegna.

d In the North area, the proportion of missing values were concentrated mainly in one region that does not routinely collect data on clinical stage.

e In the Central area, the proportion of missing values were concentrated mainly in one region (100% in one region and less than 5% in the remaining three regions) that does not routinely collect data on the clinical stage and CD4 count.

Characteristics of people undiagnosed and newly diagnosed with HIV and with low CD4 count in 2014

The characteristics of both people undiagnosed and newly diagnosed with HIV and a low CD4 count were described for the year 2014 to compare characteristics of those undiagnosed with low CD4 count with new HIV diagnoses with a low CD4 count.

The yearly diagnosed fraction (YDF) in people with a low CD4 count (CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 or CD4 < 200 cells/mm3) was calculated according to main characteristics for the year 2014. YDF has been recently proposed by Sasse et al. [18] to evaluate the ratio of new diagnoses among people living with HIV who can be diagnosed in a given year. In our study, YDF was calculated among people with HIV and with a low CD4 count according to the following formula:

YDF = Number  of new diagnoses (Number  of new diagnoses  + Estimated number  of undiagnosed HIV )x100

Prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection with low CD4 count in 2014

To evaluate the prevalence of undiagnosed people living with HIV and a low CD4 count for the year 2014, the rate expressed was calculated as follows:

Estimated number of undiagnosed people  living with HIV  with a CD4<350 cells/mm3Number of people aged 1574 years x 100,000

As a denominator, the population aged > 15 years up to 75 years estimated by the ISTAT was used [16].The described undiagnosed prevalence of HIV infection was also calculated by region of residence and by HIV exposure group. As denominator, the female population for heterosexual women and the male population for men was used. For MSM, a proportion of 3% of the adult male population was assumed, given that published data reveals estimates of MSM ranging from 2% to 4% of the male population in Italy [19-21]. Thus, for heterosexual men the remaining 97% of male population was used.

Results

National HIV surveillance system data

About 4,000 new HIV diagnoses were notified to the INHS annually during the period 2012–2014 (Table 2). Clinical stage at HIV diagnosis was reported for 70% of people, 39% of them were diagnosed at clinical advanced stage (clinical stage B or C). Table 2, shows the distribution of new HIV diagnoses by main characteristics; these were similar during the 3 years: the majority were men, more than half aged between 25 and 44 years, and more than one third were MSM. More than half were diagnosed late, namely with CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3.

Table 2. Main characteristics of new HIV diagnoses in people aged above 15 years by year, Italy, 2012–2014.

2012 2013 2014
n % % excluding
NA values
n % % excluding
NA values
n % % excluding
NA values
Total diagnoses 4,127 3,797 3,679
Sex
Women 872 21.1 21.1 833 21.9 21.9 746 20.3 20.3
Men 3,255 78.9 78.9 2,964 78.1 78.1 2,933 79.7 79.7
Age group (years)
15–24 331 8.0 8.0 291 7.7 7.7 322 8.8 8.8
25–34 1,319 32.0 32.0 1,121 29.5 29.5 1,063 28.9 28.9
35–44 1,239 30.0 30.0 1,210 31.9 31.9 1,131 30.7 30.7
45–54 827 20.0 20.0 775 20.4 20.4 746 20.3 20.3
≥ 55 411 10.0 10.0 400 10.5 10.5 417 11.3 11.3
HIV exposure groups
PWID 211 5.1 5.1 178 4.7 4.7 141 3.8 3.8
Heterosexual women 704 17.1 17.1 709 18.7 18.7 625 17.0 17.0
Heterosexual men 1,059 25.7 25.7 981 25.8 25.8 973 26.5 26.5
MSM 1,579 38.2 38.2 1,507 39.7 39.7 1,512 41.1 41.1
Other/NA 574 13.9 13.9 422 11.1 11.1 428 11.6 11.6
Nationality
Italian 3,019 73.1 73.6 2,864 75.4 75.6 2,671 72.6 72.9
Non-Italian 1,084 26.3 26.4 925 24.4 24.4 995 27.0 27.1
NA 24 0.6 8 0.2 13 0.4
Geographical area
North 2,354 57.0 57.0 2,113 55.6 55.6 1,978 53.8 53.8
Central 1,054 25.6 25.6 1,028 27.1 27.1 1,023 27.8 27.8
South 719 17.4 17.4 656 17.3 17.3 678 18.4 18.4
Clinical stage of HIV infection
A 1,832 44.4 61.8 1,660 43.7 62.6 1,705 46.3 64.9
B 483 11.7 16.3 397 10.5 14.9 352 9.6 13.4
C 649 15.7 21.9 596 15.7 22.5 571 15.5 21.7
NA 1,163 28.2 1,144 30.1 1,051 28.6
CD4 count (cells/mm3)
< 200 1,188 28.8 36.7 1,108 29.2 37.3 998 27.1 34.9
200–349 591 14.3 18.3 587 15.5 19.8 531 14.4 18.6
350–499 581 14.1 18.0 514 13.5 17.3 535 14.5 18.7
≥ 500 873 21.2 27.0 759 20.0 25.6 798 21.7 27.9
NA 894 21.7 829 21.8 817 22.2

MSM: men who have sex with men; NA: not available; PWID: people who inject drugs.

Estimates of people living with undiagnosed HIV and a low CD4 count

Using the described model, the estimated number of people living with undiagnosed HIV infection and with CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3 in Italy was 6,028 (95% CI: 5,090–7,826) in 2012, 6,156 (95% CI: 4,891–8,517) in 2013, and 5,899 (95% CI: 4,882–7,786) in 2014. Table 3, shows the estimated number of undiagnosed people living with HIV and CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3 by demographic information, and by geographical area of residence. The highest estimated numbers in 2014 were in men (4,893; 95% CI: 3,992–6,568), both MSM (2,115; 95% CI: 1,292–3,395) and heterosexual men (2,017; 95% CI: 1,183–3,301) as well as in people living in the North (2,475; 95% CI: 1,651–3,783).

Table 3. Estimated number of people living with undiagnosed HIVa with CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 or CD4 < 200 cells/mm3, by main characteristics and year, Italy, 2012–2014.

2012 2013 2014
Point estimate (n) 95% CI Point estimate (n) 95% CI Point estimate (n) 95% CI
Undiagnosed with CD4 < 350 cells/mm3
Total population 6,028 5,0907,826 6,156 4,8918,517 5,899 4,8827,786
Sex
Women 1,230 1,0211,690 1,200 6502,051 1,017 4991,790
Men 4,799 3,9986,323 4,961 3,874–7,085 4,893 3,9926,568
Age group (years)
15–24 148 29349 267 40589 218 32500
25–34 1,483 8112,510 1,593 8492,749 1,283 6712,171
35–44 1,963 1,2553,074 1,935 1,2243,095 1,798 1,0472,958
45–54 1,393 8282,262 1,354 7502,316 1,294 6722,277
≥ 55 932 4591,670 965 4581,752 1,233 6402,149
HIV exposure group
PWID 413 132868 304 104603 213 55457
Heterosexual women 1,039 5391,787 952 4801,689 827 3741,514
Heterosexual men 1,863 1,1773,322 2,018 1,2423,263 2,017 1,1833,301
MSM 1,860 1,1642,937 2,050 1,2553,279 2,115 1,2923,395
Other/NA 835 3761,554 1,037 2732,268 868 3061,701
Nationality
Italian 4,386 3,3826,101 4,703 3,6176,617 4,178 3,1285,922
Non-Italian 1,644 9602,668 1,441 7812,497 1,738 9722,926
Geographical area
North 3,063 2,2034,462 2,924 2,0254,414 2,475 1,6513,783
Central 1,899 9473,310 2,027 9633,636 1,838 9433,109
South 1,212 7281,948 1,320 7632,194 1,555 9402,511
Undiagnosed with CD4 < 200 cells/mm3
Total population 2,467 2,0523,145 2,456 2,0273,151 2,524 2,0753,246
Sex
Women 457 326644 553 341860 416 247656
Men 2,012 1,6502,590 1,903 1,5442,472 2,114 1,7142,755
Age group (years)
15–24 96 27203 81 18178 65 8155
25–34 461 272731 442 251709 358 196587
35–44 810 5461,215 826 5471,247 812 5301,236
45–54 638 423952 654 4211,002 667 4211,033
≥ 55 406 238645 419 251664 569 345896
HIV exposure group
PWID 149 58283 122 47232 133 42265
Heterosexual women 378 219602 415 241663 345 196554
Heterosexual men 808 5501,123 859 5781,290 889 5851,354
MSM 761 5141,123 734 4851,103 787 5231,183
Other/NA 379 188657 403 156760 503 232892
Nationality
Italian 1,770 1,4462,285 1,794 1,4552,334 1,920 1,5582,494
Non-Italian 701 4521,070 674 4171,047 590 350942
Geographical area
North 1,349 1,0531,817 1,214 9211,674 1,194 8991,652
Central 531 284877 729 4171,171 768 4211,254
South 517 341777 520 335795 568 369866

CI: confidence interval; MSM: men who have sex with men; NA: not available; PWID: people who inject drugs.

a Estimates adjusted for reporting delays and missing values.

The estimated number of people living with undiagnosed HIV infection and CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3 in Italy was 2,467 (95% CI: 2,052–3,145) in 2012, 2,456 (95% CI: 2,027–3,151) in 2013, and 2,524 (95% CI: 2,075–3,246) in 2014 (Table 3). Also for the undiagnosed people with CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3, the highest estimates were in men, those living in the North and in MSM.

Among the undiagnosed people living with HIV and with low CD4 count, the proportion of those with CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3 was 40.9% in 2012, 39.9% in 2013, and 42.8% in 2014. These proportions were similar according to all characteristics from 2012 to 2014.

Characteristics of people undiagnosed and newly diagnosed with HIV and with low CD4 count in 2014

In Table 4, for the year 2014, main characteristics of people undiagnosed and newly diagnosed with HIV and with a low CD4 count are compared. The characteristics of those newly diagnosed and with a low CD4 count were similar to those of people with undiagnosed HIV and with a low CD4 count.

Table 4. Proportions of new HIV diagnoses, undiagnosed and yearly diagnosed fraction among people living with HIV and with low CD4 counta by main characteristics, Italy, 2014.

New diagnoses with CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 Undiagnosed people with CD4 < 350cells/mm3 YDF
in people
with
CD4 < 350 cells/mm3
New diagnoses with CD4 < 200 cells/
mm3
Undiagnosed people with
CD4 < 200 cells/mm3
YDF
in people
with
CD4 < 200 cells/mm3
n % n % % 95% CI n % n % % 95% CI
Total population 1,529 100.0 5,899 100.0 20.6 16.4–23.8 998 100.0 2,524 100.0 28.3 23.5–32.5
Sex
Women 344 22.5 1,017 17.2 25.3 16.1–40.8 216 21.6 416 16.4 34.2 24.8–46.7
Men 1,185 77.5 4,893 82.8 19.5 15.3–22.9 782 78.4 2,114 83.6 27.0 22.1–31.3
Age group (years)
15–24 76 5.0 218 3.7 25.9 13.2–70.4 36 3.6 65 2.6 35.6 18.8–81.8
25–34 326 21.3 1,283 22.0 20.3 13.1–32.7 163 16.3 358 14.5 31.3 21.7–45.4
35–44 501 32.8 1,798 30.9 21.8 14.5–32.4 328 32.9 812 32.9 28.8 21.0–38.2
45–54 380 24.8 1,294 22.2 22.7 14.3–36.1 294 29.5 667 27.0 30.6 22.2–41.1
≥ 55 246 16.1 1,233 21.2 16.6 10.3–27.8 177 17.7 569 23.0 23.7 16.5–33.9
HIV exposure group
PWID 65 4.3 213 3.5 23.4 12.5–54.2 48 4.8 133 5.0 26.5 15.3–53.3
Heterosexual women 308 20.1 827 13.7 27.1 16.9–45.2 195 19.5 345 13.0 36.1 26.0–49.9
Heterosexual men 486 31.8 2,017 33.4 19.4 12.8–29.1 347 34.8 889 33.5 28.1 20.4–37.2
MSM 539 35.2 2,115 35.0 20.3 13.7–29.4 306 30.7 787 29.6 28.0 20.6–36.9
Other/NA 131 8.6 868 14.4 13.1 7.2–30.0 102 10.2 503 18.9 16.9 10.3–30.5
Nationality
Italian 1,105 72.6 4,178 70.6 20.9 15.7–26.1 738 74.3 1,920 76.5 27.8 22.8–32.1
Non-Italian 418 27.4 1,738 29.4 19.4 12.5–30.1 255 25.7 590 23.5 30.2 21.3–42.1
Geographical area
North 895 58.5 2,425 42.2 26.6 19.1–35.2 570 57.1 1,194 47.1 32.3 25.7–38.8
Central 230 15.1 1,838 31.3 11.1b 6.9–19.6 156 15.6 768 30.4 16.9b 11.1–27.0
South 404 26.4 1,555 26.5 20.6 13.9–30.1 272 27.3 568 22.5 32.4 23.9–42.4

MSM: men who have sex with men; NA: not available; PWID; people who inject drugs; YDF: yearly diagnosed fraction.

a Defined as CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 and CD4 < 200 cells/mm3.

b Data in this table are underestimated, as in the Central area new diagnoses with missing CD4 count was at 60%.

The YDF is expressed as the yearly number of new diagnoses / (yearly number of new diagnoses + estimated number of undiagnosed people living with HIV).

Many people undiagnosed and with CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3 were men and older than 35 years, while a third were MSM and, another third were heterosexual men. About a third were born abroad and nearly half resided in the North of Italy. Similarly, men (MSM and heterosexual men), people older than 35 years, and those living in the North were among those most represented among undiagnosed people with HIV and with CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3 (Table 4).

In Table 4 also shows the YDFs by main characteristics and CD4 count. The YDF was 20.6% (95% CI: 16.4–23.8%) among people with CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3; the highest proportion was observed among heterosexual women (27.1%; 95% CI: 16.9–45.2%) and among people living in the North (26.6%; 95% CI: 19.1–35.2%).The YDF among people with CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3 was 28.3% (95% CI: 23.5–32.5%); once again, the highest proportion was observed among heterosexual women (36.1%; 95% CI: 26.0–49.9%). Similar results for the previous years (2012 and 2013) were observed (data not shown).

Prevalence of people living with undiagnosed HIV and with low CD4 cell count in 2014

Figure 1 shows the prevalence of people with undiagnosed HIV and with CD4 < 350 cells/mm3, calculated as a rate per 100,000 adult residents. Overall, this rate was 11.3 (95% CI: 9.3–14.9) per 100,000 residents older than 15 years. The prevalence of people with undiagnosed HIV varied between the different Italian regions from 0.7 per 100,000 (Calabria) to 20.8 per 100,000 adults (Liguria); North and Central areas showed higher rates of those undiagnosed with a low CD4 count (Figure 1A ).

Figure 1.

Prevalence rates of people living with undiagnosed HIV and with low CD4 cell counta by HIV exposure groupb and regionc, Italy, 2014

MSM: men who have sex with men.

a CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3

b The undiagnosed rates were calculated as follows: total population (panel A) – number of all undiagnosed with CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 divided by the number of residents in each region, multiplied by 100,000; Italian average: 11.3 (95%CI:9.3-14.9) per 100,000 residents. Heterosexual women (panel B) – number of undiagnosed heterosexual women with CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 divided by the number of women resident in each region, multiplied by 100,000; Italian average: 3.0 (95%CI: 1.4-5.6) per 100,000 heterosexual women residents. MSM (panel C) – number of undiagnosed MSM with CD4 counts < 350 cells/mm3 divided by the number of MSM (3% of men) resident in each region, multiplied by 100,000; Italian average: 280.4 (95%CI: 173.3–450.2) per 100,000 MSM residents. Heterosexual men (panel D) – number of undiagnosed heterosexual men with CD4 counts < 350 cells/mm3 divided by the number of heterosexual men (97% of men), resident in each region, multiplied by 100,000; Italian average: 8.3 (95%CI:4.9-13.6) per 100,000 heterosexual men residents.

c For regions (one in the Central area and one in the North area) that did not collect data on the clinical stage and CD4 count, the number of undiagnosed was estimated assuming the distribution of clinical stage and CD4 count observed at national level (Table 2).

Figure 1

Figure 1 (Panel B–D) shows the regional prevalence rates of undiagnosed people with HIV and with low CD4 cell count by HIV exposure groups. For heterosexual women the prevalence rate was 3.0 (95% CI: 1.4–5.6) per 100,000 women; the regional rates ranged from 0.1 (Friuli) to 15.6 (Trentino Alto Adige). Most of the Italian regions (15 regions) had prevalence rates ranging from 2.0 to 4.0 per 100,000 women (Figure 1B). For MSM the rate at national level was 280.4 (95% CI: 173.3 – 450.2) per 100,000 MSM, for heterosexual men it was 8.3 (95% CI: 4.9–13.6) per 100,000 heterosexual men. The prevalence rates among MSM ranged from 6.2 (Basilicata, Molise, and Valle d’Aosta) to 450.6 (Liguria); almost all regions showed rates higher than 16 per 100, 000 (Figure 1C), in particular five regions showed a regional rate higher than 300.0 per 100,000 MSM (Umbria, Sicilia, Toscana, Lombardia, and Liguria) (results not shown in the figure). The regional rates varied for heterosexual men from 0.4 (Basilicata, and Friuli) to 16.1 (Valle d’Aosta) per 100,000 heterosexual men; almost half of the Italian regions (nine regions) had an estimated prevalence rate higher than 8.0 per 100,000 heterosexual men (Figure 1D).

The annual rate of new diagnoses in Italy was 6.1 per 100,000 adult residents in 2014, ranging from 2.0 (Calabria region) to 11.1 (Lazio region) [5] (data not shown).

Figure 2 shows the relationship between the prevalence rate of undiagnosed HIV infection with CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3, and the rate of new HIV diagnoses in the 20 Italian regions. A positive correlation (ρ Spearman = 0.66; p value = 0.002) showed that regions with higher rate of new diagnoses also were the regions with a higher rate of undiagnosed people.

Figure 2.

Correlation between the prevalence rates of undiagnosed people living with HIV and with low CD4 counta and new HIV diagnoses rates, Italy, 2014

a CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3

Figure 2

Discussion

Estimating the number of people living with undiagnosed HIV and with a low CD4 count enables the identification of determinants for a delayed access to care. We estimated the number of people with HIV and with a low CD4 count in Italy who are not yet diagnosed using an easy, reproducible, and validated model [13]. The strength of this study is that it provided estimates of demographic characteristics of undiagnosed people with HIV. The average yearly number of people living with undiagnosed HIV infection and CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 was 6,000 over the period 2012 to 2014, with a similar pattern across the years. The estimate of people with low CD4 count corresponded to 40% of the total number of people (including asymptomatic) with undiagnosed HIV infection in Italy (i.e. 15,000) [10]. The same proportion of people (40%) with CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3 was found in France for the estimated undiagnosed people with HIV in 2010 [22]. Our numbers indicate there are a substantial number of people with undiagnosed HIV in Italy who need to be treated immediately. Failure to diagnose these individuals will result in greater morbidity and mortality for them, risk of onward transmission and greater costs accrued for the health system.

Focusing on the most recent year analysed, the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infections was 11.3 per 100,000 adults in the resident population in 2014, ranging from 0.7 to 20.8 for different regions. Differences in regional prevalence could be attributed to factors, such as (i) different spread of HIV infection [5,15], (ii) different levels of HIV risk awareness [23,24], and (iii) the risk groups prevalent in each region.

This is in line with a cross-sectional study [20] that indicated a higher prevalence of people diagnosed and linked to care in northern Italy. Moreover, despite IDCs being well distributed throughout Italy, surveillance data indicates higher numbers of new diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS, as well as of HIV-positive people under treatment, in the North [5,15].

Different levels of HIV risk awareness were confirmed in a respective study, which showed that people living in the North were less aware of HIV risk factors compared with those in the Centre and South of Italy [23]. Furthermore, a study showed that regional differences of HIV risk awareness seem to be correlated with different socioeconomic factors and lifestyles existent in North and South Italy (unpublished data).

Differences in regional prevalences of undiagnosed HIV infection were very similar to those observed among HIV-positive people diagnosed that were linked to care [15] as well as to differences observed among new HIV diagnoses across the Italian regions [5]. These findings confirm that, at least in Italy, regions with high rates of new diagnoses also encompass a high proportion of both diagnosed and undiagnosed people [5,15]. This highlights the importance of the regional differences in the spread of HIV infection that can be observed at a wider level across European countries as well as within the United States [25,26].

In addition, the highest prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection was observed among MSM in whom it was 280 per 100,000 MSM, whereas among heterosexual men it was 8 per 100,000 heterosexual men, and among heterosexual women it was 3 per 100,000 female residents, with large differences across the Italian regions. Even though MSM have been reported to have high HIV testing rates compared with other key populations in high-income countries [24,27-29], as well as, the highest perception of the risk of HIV infection [23,24], the study findings show that they account for the highest number (2,115) and the highest proportion (35%) of undiagnosed people with a low CD4 count in 2014. MSM in Italy are also the subgroup most represented (nearly 50%) among the total population of undiagnosed HIV people (including asymptomatic), as estimated by Mammone et al. [10]. This could be attributed to a high rate of new infections in this group during the most recent years [1,30-32] combined with a large number of undiagnosed people who contribute to ongoing transmission [10,22,33]. In addition, a high HIV prevalence and a high proportion of MSM with undiagnosed HIV could be attributed to high levels of sexual activity and to some risk behaviours for sexual transmission of HIV [34]. Therefore, test-seeking behaviour should be encouraged and voluntary counselling and testing made more accessible in Italy, a country where the stigma against HIV and homosexuality may still be prevalent [20,35].

Focusing on the most recent year in our analysis, a high proportion of undiagnosed people with low CD4 count was reported among heterosexual men (33.4%), whereas in other Italian studies this population accounted for a quarter of the total undiagnosed (including those asymptomatic [10]), and a quarter of new diagnoses reported to the INHS [5]. The higher proportion of heterosexual men among undiagnosed with a low CD4 count could depend, partly, on the fact that heterosexuals were more likely to have a longer undiagnosed interval (time lag from infection to HIV diagnosis) as shown in other studies worldwide [8,36-38]. In Italy, Mammone et al. [37] estimated that heterosexuals had a far longer lag from infection to HIV diagnosis compared with MSM (7.7 vs 3.7 years).

We found a YDF of 20.6% which was similar to that reported recently by Sasse [18] on the total HIV population in the European countries. Among heterosexual women the YDF was the highest (27.1%) compared to the other groups, suggesting a more frequent access to HIV testing, likely facilitated from routine screening during pregnancy in this population [5,39]. This result may mean a certain degree of success with regard to testing in this group. The highest YDF (26.6%) among people living in the North compared to the other areas may be an indicator of the wider availability of IDCs and HIV testing services in this area [40]. A higher detection could represent a more efficient and therefore better surveillance system.

This study has some limitations. First, we assumed that people with HIV who develop AIDS, or other HIV-related symptoms, will almost certainly present for care, and as consequence, will be all diagnosed with HIV and notified to the surveillance system (assumption of London method) [12,13]. However, the assumption of the London method can be considered acceptable for our study, as HIV testing and access to care are free in all IDCs and the proportion of people living with HIV who do not attend the IDCs should be reasonably low. Another limitation was the assumption that CD4 counts in those where the information was not available was the same as in those with available information. This assumption was supported by other studies conducted on the Italian HIV Surveillance data [10]. The missing CD4 count information, In the Italian national HIV surveillance data, mainly in the Central regions, may make the estimates less robust. However, in the remaining areas the proportion of missing data were lower than 10%.

In terms of the reporting delay we assumed a constant decrease over the 3 years. This had a small impact on the estimates as it was sufficiently low. Other limitations which may have a considerable impact on the eventual estimates include the effect of new testing strategies, the changes over time in the reporting of data, and the different quality of data in the surveillance systems of all the regions.

Conclusions

About 6,000 HIV-positive people with low CD4 counts, remained annually undiagnosed between 2012 and 2014 in Italy. This indicates that ca 40% of the 15,000 total undiagnosed people living with HIV in Italy were in immediate need of diagnosis, linkage to care and antiretroviral treatment in order to avert high HIV-related morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs.

The majority of those with undiagnosed HIV and with low CD4 counts were MSM and heterosexual men, and there were large differences in prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infections with low CD4 across the Italian regions. These findings highlight the importance of improving HIV testing availability, with a focus on men, in order to diagnose and provide treatment to those living with undiagnosed HIV in Italy.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the regional representatives of the HIV Surveillance System for their useful help and constant availability. We would like to thank ISS colleagues involved in the management of National HIV Surveillance System: Laura Camoni, Mariangela Raimondo, Lucia Pugliese.

The authors thank the referees for many helpful comments and suggestions.

Preliminary results of this study were presented orally at the 8th Italian Conference on AIDS and Retroviruses (ICAR), June 6–8 2016, Milan, Italy; Not Ist Super Sanità 2016; 29(9) Suppl 1, presentation n.47.

Financial support: The Italian National HIV Surveillance system is funded by the Italian Ministry of Health – CCM (National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control).

Regional representatives of the National HIV Surveillance System

National HIV Surveillance System include: Abruzzo: Manuela Di Giacomo, Viviana Faggioni, Luigi Scancella; Basilicata: Francesco Locuratolo, Gabriella Cauzillo; Calabria: Anna Domenica Mignuoli, Daniele Giuseppe Chirico; Campania: Guglielmo Borgia; Emilia Romagna: Erika Massimiliani; Friuli Venezia Giulia: Tolinda Gallo, Cinzia Braida; Lazio: Vincenzo Puro, Paola Scognamiglio, Alessia Mammone; Liguria: Giancarlo Icardi, Piero Luigi Lai; Lombardia: Maria Gramegna, Liliana Coppola, Alessandra Piatti, Annamaria Rosa, Danilo Cereda; Marche: Fabio Filippetti; Molise: Alessandra Prozzo; Piemonte: Chiara Pasqualini; Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano: Peter Mian, Oswald Moling, Leonardo Pagani; Provincia Autonoma di Trento: Paolo Lanzafame, Lucia Collini, Danila Bassetti; Puglia: Maria Chironna; Sardegna: Maria Antonietta Palmas; Sicilia: Gabriella Dardanoni; Toscana: Fabio Voller, Monia Puglia, Lucia Pecori; Umbria: Anna Tosti, Rita Papili; Valle d’Aosta: Mauro Ruffier, Marina Giulia Verardo, Elisa Francesca Echarlod, Saveria Amoroso; Veneto: Francesca Russo, Filippo da Re.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Authors’ contributions: Vincenza Regine designed the study and was responsible for study coordination; Vincenza Regine and Maria Dorrucci made statistical analysis, applied the model and drafted the manuscript; Patrizio Pezzotti, Alessia Mammone and Chantal Quinten have made statistical advice, contributed to draft data interpretation and revised the manuscript; Anastasia Pharris contributed to draft data interpretation. Barbara Suligoi coordinated the National HIV Surveillance System, was the guarantor of the study and revised the manuscript. The regional representatives of the National HIV Surveillance System were responsible for data collection. All authors read, amended and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) / World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO). HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe 2015. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. Available from: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/HIV-AIDS-surveillance-Europe-2015.pdf
  • 2.The late presenters working group in COHERE in EuroCoord Late presentation for HIV care across Europe: update from the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) study, 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(47):30070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV Surveillance Report, 2014; vol. 26. Atlanta: CDC; Nov 2015. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html
  • 4.Camoni L, Raimondo M, Regine V, Salfa MC, Suligoi B, regional representatives of the HIV Surveillance System Late presenters among persons with a new HIV diagnosis in Italy, 2010-2011. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):281. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raimondo M, Boros S, Regine V, Pugliese L, Santaquilani M, Ferri M, et al. Aggiornamento nuove diagnosi di infezione HIV e dei casi di AIDS 2015. [Updating of new diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS cases in Italy at December 31, 2015]. Not Ist Super Sanità. 2016; 29(9) Suppl 1. Italian. Available from: http://www.iss.it/publ/index.php?lang=1&id=3003&tipo=4
  • 6.Girardi E, Sabin CA, Monforte AD. Late diagnosis of HIV infection: epidemiological features, consequences and strategies to encourage earlier testing. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46(Suppl 1):S3-8. 10.1097/01.qai.0000286597.57066.2b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Platten M, Linnemann R, Kümmerle T, Jung N, Wyen C, Ehren K, et al. Clinical course and quality of care in ART-naïve patients newly presenting in a HIV outpatient clinic. Infection. 2014;42(5):849-57. 10.1007/s15010-014-0646-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wong NS, Wong KH, Lee MP, Tsang OTY, Chan DPC, Lee SS. Estimation of the undiagnosed intervals of HIV-Infected people by a modified back-calculation method for reconstructing the epidemic curves. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159021. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Quinn TC, Wawer MJ, Sewankambo N, Serwadda D, Li C, Wabwire-Mangen F, et al. Rakai Project Study Group Viral load and heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(13):921-9. 10.1056/NEJM200003303421303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mammone A, Pezzotti P, Regine V, Camoni L, Puro V, Ippolito G, et al. How many people are living with undiagnosed HIV infection? An estimate for Italy, based on surveillance data. AIDS. 2016;30(7):1131-6. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Op de Coul EL, Schreuder I, Conti S, van Sighem A, Xiridou M, Van Veen MG, et al. Changing Patterns of Undiagnosed HIV Infection in the Netherlands: Who Benefits Most from Intensified HIV Test and Treat Policies? PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133232. eCollection 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Lodwick RK, Nakagawa F, van Sighem A, Sabin CA, Phillips AN. Use of surveillance data on HIV diagnoses with HIV-related symptoms to estimate the number of people living with undiagnosed HIV in need of antiretroviral therapy. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121992. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). HIV modelling tool. Stockholm: ECDC; 14 Sep 2015. Available from: https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/hiv-modelling-tool
  • 14.Italian Ministry of Health. Decreto Ministeriale 31 marzo 2008. Istituzione del sistema di sorveglianza delle nuove diagnosi di infezioni da HIV. [Establishment of the surveillance system for new diagnoses of HIV infection]. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 175, 28 July 2008. Italian. Available from: http://old.iss.it/binary/ccoa/cont/7_DECRETO_31_marzo_2008.pdf
  • 15.Camoni L, Raimondo M, Dorrucci M, Regine V, Salfa MC, Suligoi B, CARPHA Study Group Estimating minimum adult HIV prevalence: a cross-sectional study to assess the characteristics of people living with HIV in Italy. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015;31(3):282-7. 10.1089/aid.2014.0154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT). Demografia in Cifre. [Demography in figures]. Rome: ISTAT. [Accessed 28 Jun 2017]. Italian. Available from: http://www.demo.istat.it/
  • 17.Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sasse A. Letter to the editor: New metrics to monitor progress towards global HIV targets: using the estimated number of undiagnosed HIV-infected people as denominator. Euro Surveill. 2016 Dec 15;21(50). pii: 30424. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.50.30424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marcus U, Hickson F, Weatherburn P, Schmidt AJ, EMIS Network Estimating the size of the MSM populations for 38 European countries by calculating the survey-surveillance discrepancies (SSD) between self-reported new HIV diagnoses from the European MSM internet survey (EMIS) and surveillance-reported HIV diagnoses among MSM in 2009. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):919. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT). [The homosexual population in Italian society]. Statistiche. Report Anno 2011. Italian. Available from: http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/62168
  • 21.Grazzini G, Raimondo M, Facco G, Regine V, Pupella S, Piccinini V, et al. A cross-sectional study among blood donors on sexual risk behaviors for HIV infection. Vox Sang. 2015;109(Suppl. 1):228-9. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Supervie V, Ndawinz JD, Lodi S, Costagliola D. The undiagnosed HIV epidemic in France and its implications for HIV screening strategies. AIDS. 2014;28(12):1797-804. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dorrucci M, Regine V, Pezzotti P, Suligoi B, Mammone A, Girardi E. “Stima della proporzione di inconsapevoli del rischio di HIV in Italia: analisi dei dati del sistema di sorveglianza HIV”. Approfondimenti in: Regine V, Pugliese L, Boros S, Santaquilani M, Ferri M, Suligoi B. Aggiornamento delle nuove diagnosi di infezione da HIV e dei casi di AIDS in Italia al 31 dicembre 2016. Not Ist Super Sanità. 2017; 30(9) Suppl 1:17-18. Available from: http://old.iss.it/publ/index.php?lang=1&id=3087&tipo=4
  • 24.Clifton S, Nardone A, Field N, Mercer CH, Tanton C, Macdowall W, et al. HIV testing, risk perception, and behaviour in the British population. AIDS. 2016;30(6):943-52. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hall HI, An Q, Tang T, Song R, Chen M, Green T, et al. Prevalence of Diagnosed and Undiagnosed HIV Infection--United States, 2008-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(24):657-62. PMID:26110835 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Pharris A, Quinten C, Noori T, Amato-Gauci AJ, van Sighem A, ECDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance and Dublin Declaration Monitoring Networks Estimating HIV incidence and number of undiagnosed individuals living with HIV in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(48):30417. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.48.30417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sonnenberg P, Clifton S, Beddows S, Field N, Soldan K, Tanton C, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and uptake of interventions for sexually transmitted infections in Britain: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet. 2013;382(9907):1795-806. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61947-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fernàndez-López L, Reyes-Urueña J, Agustí C, Kustec T, Klavs I, Casabona C; COBATEST Network group. The COBATEST network: a platform to perform monitoring and evaluation of HIV community-based testing practices in Europe and conduct operational research. AIDS Care. 2016;28(sup1) Suppl 1;32-6. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09540121.2016.1146218PMID:26883807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Tao G, Hoover KW. Differences in access to healthcare and utilisation of HIV and sexually transmissible infection services between men who have sex with men and men who have sex only with women: results of the 2006-10 National Survey of Family Growth in the United States. Sex Health. 2013;10(4):363-8. 10.1071/SH13017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Giuliani M, Vescio MF, Latini A, Palamara G, Pimpinelli F, Dona MG, et al. Continuous increase in HIV-1 incidence after the year 2000 among men who have sex with men in Rome: insights from a 25-year retrospective cohort study. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(47):20969. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.47.20969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Le Vu S, Le Strat Y, Barin F, Pillonel J, Cazein F, Bousquet V, et al. Population-based HIV-1 incidence in France, 2003-08: a modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(10):682-7. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70167-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meireles P, Lucas R, Carvalho C, Fuertes R, Brito J, Campos MJ, et al. Incident risk factors as predictors of HIV seroconversion in the Lisbon cohort of men who have sex with men: first results, 2011-2014. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(14):21091. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.14.21091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yin Z, Brown AE, Hughes G, Nardone A, Gill ON, Delpech VC, et al. HIV in the United Kingdom 2014 Report: data to end 2013. London: Public Health England. Nov 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/401662/2014_PHE_HIV_annual_report_draft_Final_07-01-2015.pdf
  • 34.Ferrer L, Furegato M, Foschia JP, Folch C, González V, Ramarli D, et al. Undiagnosed HIV infection in a population of MSM from six European cities: results from the Sialon project. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(3):494-500. 10.1093/eurpub/cku139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mirandola M, Gios L, Joanna Davis R, Furegato M, Breveglieri M, Folch C, et al. Socio-demographic factors predicting HIV test seeking behaviour among MSM in 6 EU cities. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(2):313-8. 10.1093/eurpub/ckw144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ndawinz JD, Costagliola D, Supervie V. New method for estimating HIV incidence and time from infection to diagnosis using HIV surveillance data: results for France. AIDS. 2011;25(15):1905-13. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834af619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mammone A, Pezzotti P, Camoni L, Regine V, Raimondo M, Dorrucci M, et al. Time from infection with HIV to diagnosis in Italy: an estimate using surveillance data. Oral presentation. Proceedings of the 8th Italian Conference on AIDS and antiviral research (ICAR); 2016 Jun 6-8; Milan, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Song R, Hall HI, Green TA, Szwarcwald CL, Pantazis N. Using CD4 Data to Estimate HIV Incidence, Prevalence, and Percent of Undiagnosed Infections in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(1):3-9. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antenatal screening for HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis and rubella susceptibility in the EU/EEA. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. Available from: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/antenatal-screening-HIV-hepatitis-B-syphilis-rubella-EU.pdf
  • 40.Camoni L, Raimondo M, Urciuoli R, Iacchini S, Suligoi B, Pezzotti P, et al. [People living with HIV in Italy: data from the second census]. Not Ist Super Sanità. 2017; 30(1). Italian. Available from: http://www.iss.it/binary/publ/cont/ONLINE_GENNAIO.pdf

Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES