This letter is in response to letter by Singh et al.[1] pertaining to our recent publication “Biometric changes in Indian pediatric cataract and postoperative refractive status”.[2] Here are our responses point-by-point.
The number of patients in unilateral group was not too large and hence a reliable analysis was not possible to compare unilateral and bilateral eyes.[2]
The refraction on day 1 post operatively was not done under general anaesthesia. It was not expected to be completely accurate, but it gave a general impression of the accuracy of under correction and desired refractive status.[3]
Based on previous experience with SRK II and postoperative refractive status of Indian children, nomogram in Table 1 was used for desired outcomes.[4]
Table 1.
Undercorrection of IOL power based on SRKII formula
Age | Undercorrection to IOL* power calculated by SRK II formula** |
---|---|
>5 years | no under correction |
5 years | 2% under correction |
4 years | 3% under correction |
3 years | 4% under correction |
2 years | 5% under correction |
18 months | 7% under correction |
1 year | 10% under correction |
6 months-1 year | 15% under correction |
<6 months | 20% under correction |
*IOL- Intraocular lens, **Sanders DR, Retzlaff J, Kraff MC. Comparison of the SRK II™ formula and other second generation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988 Mar; 14 (2):136-41
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Singh J, Agrawal S, Srivastava RM. Comments on: Biometric changes in Indian pediatric cataract and postoperative refractive status. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67:1906. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1248_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khokhar SK, Tomar A, Pillay G, Agrawal E. Biometric changes in Indian pediatric cataract and postoperative refractive status. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67:1068–72. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1327_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Enyedi LB, Peterseim MW, Freedman SF, Buckley EG. Refractive changes after pediatric intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:772–81. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00247-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jasman A-A, Shaharuddin B, Noor R-AM, Ismail S, Ghani ZA, Embong Z. Prediction error and accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric patient comparing SRK II and Pediatric IOL Calculator. BMC Ophthalmol. 2010;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-10-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]