Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224764

Whole body periodic acceleration in normal and reduced mucociliary clearance of conscious sheep

Juan R Sabater 1,#, Marvin A Sackner 1,2,#, Jose A Adams 3,*,#, William M Abraham 1,#
Editor: Jerome W Breslin4
PMCID: PMC6837306  PMID: 31697733

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to ascertain whether nitric oxide (NO) released into the circulation by a noninvasive technology called whole body periodic acceleration (WBPA) could increase mucociliary clearance (MCC). It was based on observations by others that nitric oxide donor drugs increase ciliary beat frequency of nasal epithelium without increasing mucociliary clearance. Tracheal mucous velocity (TMV), a reflection of MCC, was measured in sheep after 1-hour treatment of WBPA and repeated after pretreatment with the NO synthase inhibitor, L-NAME to demonstrated action of NO. Aerosolized human neutrophil elastase (HNE) was administered to sheep to suppress TMV as might occur in cystic fibrosis and other inflammatory lung diseases. WBPA increased TMV to a peak of 136% of baseline 1h after intervention, an effect blocked by L-NAME. HNE reduced TMV to 55% of baseline but slowing was reversed by WBPA, protection lost in the presence of L-NAME. NO released into the circulation from eNOS by WBPA can acutely access airway epithelium for improving MCC slowed in cystic fibrosis and other inflammatory lung diseases as a means of enhancing host defense against pathogens.

1.0 Introduction

Airway inflammation occurs in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cystic fibrosis (CF). Although inflammation is most commonly linked to bronchoconstriction and airway hyper-responsiveness, mucociliary clearance (MCC) may also be diminished. Evidence supporting this comes from clinical observations impaired MCC during exacerbations of asthma [1, 2], COPD [3] and CF [4] as well as experimental data that inhaled inflammatory mediators, such as neutrophil elastase slows whole lung MCC and tracheal mucus velocity (TMV). [5, 6] TMV reflects changes in whole lung clearance measured with radiolabeled human serum albumin [7, 8] Effective mucus transport depends on the coordinated relationship among ciliated surface epithelium, the mucous (gel) layer, and the periciliary fluid (sol) layer. [9] Inflammatory mediators can disrupt this process predisposing to mucus plugging, infection, and decreased pulmonary function.

It is important to determine means to block and/or reverse slowed MCC. Administration of aerosolized neutrophil elastase (HNE), an inflammatory mediator that contributes to impaired mucus clearance in asthma, COPD, and CF can serve as a model to determine effectiveness. [5] Elastase is a known mucus secretagogue, [10] that has cilio-inhibitory properties [11] and by stimulating epithelial sodium channels can reduce periciliary fluid layer therby contributing to mucus stasis [12]. These collective actions of elastase on the various components of mucociliary function are consistent with our in vivo observations that inhaled elastase reduces MCC and TMV for prolonged periods. [5] Further, such effects can be prevented and reversed with natural and synthetic elastase inhibitors, including α1-protease inhibitor, [13] secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, [14] and synthetic human neutrophil elastase (HNE) inhibitor [13] as well as beta-adrenergic agonists [5]. The latter appear to act through a NO pathway. [15]

Whole Body Periodic Acceleration (WBPA) which utilizes a motion platform to apply repetitive, sinusoidal, head to foot motion to the horizontally positioned body stimulates eNOS for release of NO into the circulation in humans and animal models through increased shear stress to the vascular endothelium. [1618] In sheep, this technology modulated antigen induced inflammatory responses such as inhibiting nuclear factor kappa beta activity. [19] The purpose of the current investigation was to determine whether NO delivered via the blood stream could access airway epithelium to increase TMV and provide protection against human neutrophil elastase (HNE) induced slowed MCC. [20, 21]

2.0 Methods

2.1 Animal Preparation

All procedures used in this study were approved by the Mount Sinai Animal Research Committee, which is responsible for ensuring humane care and use of experimental animals, under protocol number 17-22-A-03. The study complies with the ARRIVE Guidelines for in vivo animal research reporting. (S1 Table) Five adult ewes weighing 20–40 kg were restrained in an upright position in a specialized body harness and placed within a modified shopping cart with heads immobilized. Nasal intubation was carried out with a cuffed endotracheal tube (ETT, ID = 7.5 mm; Mallinckrodt Medical Inc, St. Louis, MO). The cuff of the tube was placed just below the vocal cords and position verified with a flexible bronchoscope. After intubation, the animals were allowed to equilibrate for a period of 30 min before TMV measurements began. To minimize the possible impairment of TMV caused by inflation of the ETT cuff, a deflated cuff tube was utilized throughout the study except for the short periods of HNE challenge. [22] Inspired air was warmed and humidified with an ultrasonic nebulizer (Ultra-neb 99, The Devilbiss Co, Somerset, PA) during the treatment with WBPA, and a Bennett Humidifier (Puritan-Bennett, Lenexa, KS), the rest of the time between TMV measurements.

2.2 Measurement of TMV

This method has been published previously by our laboratory and involves the use of Teflon particles (~1 mm in diameter, 0.8 mm thick, and weight from 1.5 to 2 mg) introduced via a modified suction catheter into to the ETT. TMV was measured from the video recordings of the disks velocities. [5] [23]

2.3 Administration of aerosols

The administration of aerosols has also been previously reported by our laboratory in detail. This involves a jet nebulizer (Raindrop Nebulizer, Puritan-Bennett, Carlsbad, CA), with a dosimeter system and ventilator.[5, 23]

2.4 Reagents

Human neutrophil elastase (HNE; Elastin Products, Owensville, MO) was diluted in 3 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) to a concentration of 0.1 units/ml and completely delivered as an aerosol (20 breaths/min). N-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was given as an intravenous injection; the dose per animal was 25 mg/kg in 20 ml of 0.9% NaCl as previously described. [19]

2.5 Motion platform

Whole-body periodic acceleration (WBPA, aka pGz) was administered with a motion platform that was adapted to support a sheep restrained within the cart. The animal in cart was secured to the platform for the designated treatment times depending on the specific protocol. Acceleration parameters for all studies were set to 120 cpm and Gz of ±0.2. [19] For control studies, the animals in carts were placed on the platform for the appropriate time without motion.

2.6 Protocol

The series of experiments described below were conducted in the same group of 5 sheep separated by approximately one week for each series of investigations. In these experiments, a baseline TMV measurement was obtained 30 min after intubation.

In the first series of experiments, the effect of WBPA was evaluated on resting (basal) TMV and then determined if the stimulatory effects were related to production of NO. Baseline TMV was obtained and the animals were treated with WBPA for 1 hour. TMV was measured at 0.5, 1 and 2 h after stopping WBPA. This protocol was repeated in the presence of the NO inhibitor, L-NAME. After obtaining baseline TMV, L-NAME (25 mg/kg, i.v.) was administered and after 30 min the sheep were treated with WBPA for 1 h. Serial TMV measurements were then obtained at 0.5, 1 and 2 h after stopping WBPA. Finally, we studied the time course of the TMV response to L-NAME alone. For these experiments, a baseline TMV was obtained and then the sheep were given L-NAME and TMV was measured at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3h after L-NAME administration.

The second series of experiments were carried out to determine if WBPA could reverse HNE-induced slowing of TMV. This was followed by an investigation as to whether reversal of the HNE-induced slowing of TMV could be blocked by L-NAME. For the initial studies, baseline TMV was obtained and then the animals were challenged with an aerosolized dose of HNE (0.3 units). TMV was serially measured, from 60 to 90 minutes after HNE challenge until TMV decreased to at least 40% of baseline. Once this reduction in TMV was achieved, treatment with WBPA for 1 hour was initiated. Serial TMV measurements were obtained at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after stopping WBPA.

The effect of L-NAME (25 mg/kg) on the WBPA reversal of HNE-induced depression of TMV was determined after TMV had decreased by 40%. Treatment with L-NAME was then followed by a 1h treatment with WBPA. TMV measurements were serially obtained at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after stopping WBPA. At the conclusion of all experiments, the animals were returned to their herd. None of the experiments involved terminal endpoints.

2.7 Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed by using a commercially available program (SigmaStat for Windows, version 2.03; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Comparisons of baseline TMV measurements were made with Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance on ranks. For each experiment or trial (within-group analysis), data were analyzed across time, using one-way ANOVA for repeated measurements. If the null hypothesis was rejected, pairwise comparisons were made by using Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. Comparisons of experiments at specific time intervals were evaluated by using a t-test for two samples. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant, using two-tailed analysis. All values in the text and figures are reported as means ± SE.

3.0 Results

The baseline TMV values for the different experiments are listed in Table 1. The baseline values for the start of each series of experiments did not statistically differ from each other.

Table 1. Baseline TMV for the 5 series of studies.

WBPA Elastase + WBPA L-NAME + WBPA 2Elastase +
L-NAME + WBPA
L-NAME
Mean ± SE 9.4±0.5 9.5±0.5 11.3±1.4 10.6±0.7 10.6±1.5
N 5 5 5 5 5

Values are means ± SE in mm/min. n, number of sheep. TMV, tracheal mucus velocity

Fig 1 depicts the changes in TMV after treatment with WBPA alone and when L-NAME was given prior to WBPA. Within 0.5h after stopping WBPA, TMV increased to 114 ± 4% above baseline and TMV continued to increase to a maximum of 136 ± 9% 1h after treatment. This increase in TMV persisted until the end of the 2h measurement. When L-NAME was given prior to WBPA, the stimulatory effect was completely blocked at all times (p<0.05). As depicted in Fig 1, TMV values after WBPA in the presence of L-NAME remained below baseline.

Fig 1. Changes in Tracheal Mucous Velocity with WBPA.

Fig 1

Changes in tracheal mucus velocity (TMV), expressed as a percentage of baseline, after treatment with 1 hour of WBPA (n = 5) alone and WBPA after treatment with L-NAME before WBPA (n = 5). There was significant increase of TMV (*p < 0.005 vs baseline) at 0.5, 1, and 2 hours post WBPA. L-NAME significantly blunted the effect († p< 0.01 WBPA vs L-NAME+WBPA). Values are mean ± SE. (ANOVA).

Fig 2 shows the TMV response to L-NAME alone. L-NAME caused an immediate reduction in TMV 30 minutes post-injection (67 ± 13%; p < 0.05 vs. baseline). TMV then returned toward baseline values. Although the 1h and 2h mean values were below the initial starting TMV, these values did not differ statistically from the baseline values. Three hours after L-NAME. TMV was significantly lower than baseline.

Fig 2. Change in Tracheal Mucous Velocity Due to NO Inhibition.

Fig 2

Changes in TMV after the administration of L-NAME, 25 mg/kg intravenously (n = 5). Significant difference (‡p<0.05) was present between baseline vs. 0.5 and 3 hours after administration. Although the 1h and 2h mean values were below the initial starting TMV, these values did not differ statistically from the baseline values. Values are mean ± SE (ANOVA).

Fig 3 shows the effects of WBPA without and with L-NAME on the HNE-induced reduction in TMV. As seen in aforementioned studies, administration of HNE slowed TMV which reached similar levels in the two experimental groups (WBPA = 55 ± 2% vs. L-NAME + WBPA 50 ± 3%; p>0.05). Treatment with WBPA reversed the HNE-induced TMV depression with a maximum effect at 30 minutes (112 ± 6%) post-WBPA. The protective effect of WBPA lasted for three hours. In the presence of L-NAME, WBPA had no effect.

Fig 3. Change in Tracheal Mucous Velocity after Aerosolized human neutrophil elastase and treatment with WBPA.

Fig 3

Changes in TMV after aerosolized human neutrophil elastase (HNE), and subsequent treatment with either WBPA (n = 5) or L-NAME followed by WBPA (n = 5). There was a significant increase of TMV (‡ p<0.001) at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours post WBPA compared to HNE. L-NAME significantly blunted the effect († p< 0.001 HNE-WBPA vs HNE+L-NAME+WBPA). Values are mean ± SE. (ANOVA).

4.0 Discussion

This study provides the first evidence that WBPA stimulates TMV as an in vivo marker of MCC. This effect was blocked by L-NAME indicating NO dependence. It also demonstrates that blood borne NO and its metabolites can access airway epithelium. WBPA reversed HNE-dependent slowing of TMV, comparable to responses for both experimental pharmacological agents and clinically available drugs.

In the present study, the peak stimulatory effect of WBPA on TMV (136% above baseline) in awake sheep is slightly greater than the previously reported increase of TMV (74 to 111% above baseline) observed with aerosolized beta adrenergic agonists, isoproterenol and carbuterol in anesthetized dogs [24]. Our prior studies indicate that neutrophil elastase is involved in the antigen-induced reduction in MCC [13] and that when inhaled, it also slows TMV. Bronchodilators have proven to be partly effective in reversing MCC slowing after elastase inhalation. As seen in Fig 2, WBPA reversed HNE-induced slowing of TMV and also increased the value of TMV above baseline. This result has not been previously observed with any other treatment modality. Consistent with our previous results, this WBPA-effect was completely blocked by L-NAME pre-treatment.

The current study expands previous reported results from our laboratory of the diminution of airway resistance in allergic sheep with WBPA. It had been demonstrated that 1-hour of pretreatment with WBPA protects against allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in allergic sheep, probably mediated by the activity of NO in the regulation of mast cell activation. Further, serial treatments with WBPA over four days protected sheep from developing airway hyper responsiveness after an antigen challenge. [19]

WBPA has beneficial effects on the diverse manifestations of airway inflammation that produce slowed MCC, bronchoconstriction and airway hyper responsiveness by increasing NO bioavailability. The impact on MCC of serial WBPA treatments in humans and the combination therapy of an inhaled beta agonist with WBPA remain to be investigated.

Bronchopulmonary colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes persistent morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). Chronic P. aeruginosa infection in the CF lung is associated with antibiotic-tolerant bacterial aggregates known as biofilms. Disruptions of biofilms have potential to overcome biofilm-associated antibiotic tolerance in CF and other biofilm-related diseases. [25, 26] Submicromolar NO concentrations alone disrupted biofilms within CF sputum and significantly decreased ex vivo biofilm tolerance to tobramycin and tobramycin combined with ceftazidime. In a small randomized clinical trial, 10 ppm NO inhalation significantly reduced P. aeruginosa biofilm aggregates compared with placebo across one week treatment.[25] Therefore, low dose NO (nMol/L) achieved with WBPA has the potential to serve as adjunctive therapy in CF.

As limitations to the present study is that we have not characterized whether or not longer or shorter durations of WBPA, can confer greater or less benefits respectively. The action of WBPA releasing NO into circulation as measured by descent of the dicrotic notch of the human finger pulse begins within 15 to 25 seconds after beginning WBPA. [18] The duration of NO action is complicated because NO rapidly binds to circulating proteins and is slowly released to the body in a heterogeneous manner. The current study showed that WBPA stimulates TMV as well as protects against HNE-induced slowing of TMV is in large part due to increase of NO bioavailability. However, the motion platform that produced WBPA has major limitations for human applications. It was too expensive, limited solely to use in the supine posture, and non-portable owing to its large footprint and weight (211Kg). To overcome these limitations, a portable device weighing approximately 5.5 Kg, that can be self-administered was fabricated which is called the GENTLE JOGGER (JD), It incorporates microprocessor controlled, DC motorized movements of foot pedals placed within a chassis to repetitively tap against a semi-rigid surface for simulation of locomotion while the subject is seated or lying in a bed. It is placed on the floor for seated and secured to the footplate of a bed for supine applications. Its foot pedals rapidly and repetitively alternate between right and left pedal movements to actively lift the forefeet upward followed by active downward tapping against a semi-rigid bumper placed within the chassis. In this manner, it simulates feet impacting against the ground during locomotion. Each time the passively moving foot pedals strike the bumper, a small pulse is added to the circulation as a function of pedal speed ranging from about 120 to 190 steps per minute. This technology produces pulsatile shear stress (friction) to the endothelium that increases release of nitric oxide into the circulation from eNOS. As a human application, JD decreases the rapid onset of increased systolic and diastolic blood pressures associated with human physical inactivity in both supine and seated postures. [27]

We conclude that NO released into the circulation from eNOS via vascular pulsatile shear stress from WBPA acutely accesses the airway epithelium, improving slowed MCC. The latter has significant clinical implications in CF and other inflammatory lung diseases with decreased MCC.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The ARRIVE guidelines checklist.

This table contains the ARRIVE guidelines checklist for animal research reporting for in vivo experiments.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the contribution of the late William M Abraham, PhD in study design, critical review of the methodology and data, and his tireless efforts to advance pulmonary physiology and pharmacology.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded via internal research funds from the Department of Research and Division of Neonatology.

References

  • 1.Messina MS, O’Riordan TG, Smaldone GC. Changes in mucociliary clearance during acute exacerbations of asthma. The American review of respiratory disease. 1991;143(5 Pt 1):993–7. 10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_Pt_1.993 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.O’Riordan TG, Zwang J, Smaldone GC. Mucociliary clearance in adult asthma. The American review of respiratory disease. 1992;146(3):598–603. 10.1164/ajrccm/146.3.598 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smaldone GC, Foster WM, O’Riordan TG, Messina MS, Perry RJ, Langenback EG. Regional impairment of mucociliary clearance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1993;103(5):1390–6. 10.1378/chest.103.5.1390 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Donaldson SH, Bennett WD, Zeman KL, Knowles MR, Tarran R, Boucher RC. Mucus clearance and lung function in cystic fibrosis with hypertonic saline. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;354(3):241–50. 10.1056/NEJMoa043891 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sabater JR, Lee TA, Abraham WM. Comparative effects of salmeterol, albuterol, and ipratropium on normal and impaired mucociliary function in sheep. Chest. 2005;128(5):3743–9. 10.1378/chest.128.5.3743 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scott DW, Walker MP, Sesma J, Wu B, Stuhlmiller TJ, Sabater JR, et al. SPX-101 Is a Novel Epithelial Sodium Channel-targeted Therapeutic for Cystic Fibrosis That Restores Mucus Transport. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(6):734–44. 10.1164/rccm.201612-2445OC . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sabater JR, Mao YM, Shaffer C, James MK, O’Riordan TG, Abraham WM. Aerosolization of P2Y(2)-receptor agonists enhances mucociliary clearance in sheep. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;87(6):2191–6. 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.6.2191 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hirsh AJ, Sabater JR, Zamurs A, Smith RT, Paradiso AM, Hopkins S, et al. Evaluation of second generation amiloride analogs as therapy for cystic fibrosis lung disease. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2004;311(3):929–38. 10.1124/jpet.104.071886 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boucher RC. Airway surface dehydration in cystic fibrosis: pathogenesis and therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2007;58:157–70. 10.1146/annurev.med.58.071905.105316 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fischer BM, Voynow JA. Neutrophil elastase induces MUC5AC gene expression in airway epithelium via a pathway involving reactive oxygen species. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;26(4):447–52. 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.4.4473 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Amitani R, Wilson R, Rutman A, Read R, Ward C, Burnett D, et al. Effects of human neutrophil elastase and Pseudomonas aeruginosa proteinases on human respiratory epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1991;4(1):26–32. 10.1165/ajrcmb/4.1.26 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Caldwell RA, Boucher RC, Stutts MJ. Neutrophil elastase activates near-silent epithelial Na+ channels and increases airway epithelial Na+ transport. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005;288(5):L813–9. 10.1152/ajplung.00435.2004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.O’Riordan TG, Otero R, Mao Y, Lauredo I, Abraham WM. Elastase contributes to antigen-induced mucociliary dysfunction in ovine airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(5):1522–8. 10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154852 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wright CD, Havill AM, Middleton SC, Kashem MA, Lee PA, Dripps DJ, et al. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor prevents allergen-induced pulmonary responses in animal models of asthma. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1999;289(2):1007–14. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chowienczyk PJ, Kelly RP, MacCallum H, Millasseau SC, Andersson TL, Gosling RG, et al. Photoplethysmographic assessment of pulse wave reflection: blunted response to endothelium-dependent beta2-adrenergic vasodilation in type II diabetes mellitus. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1999;34(7):2007–14. 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00441-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adams JA, Bassuk J, Wu D, Grana M, Kurlansky P, Sackner MA. Periodic acceleration: effects on vasoactive, fibrinolytic, and coagulation factors. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(3):1083–90. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00662.2004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adams JA, Moore JE Jr., Moreno MR, Coelho J, Bassuk J, Wu D. Effects of periodic body acceleration on the in vivo vasoactive response to N-omega-nitro-L-arginine and the in vitro nitric oxide production. AnnBiomedEng. 2003;31(11):1337–46. 213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sackner MA, Gummels E, Adams JA. Nitric oxide is released into circulation with whole-body, periodic acceleration. Chest. 2005;127(1):30–9. 10.1378/chest.127.1.30 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abraham WM, Ahmed A, Serebriakov I, Lauredo IT, Bassuk J, Adams JA, et al. Whole-body periodic acceleration modifies experimental asthma in sheep. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(7):743–52. 10.1164/rccm.200601-048OC . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li D, Shirakami G, Zhan X, Johns RA. Regulation of ciliary beat frequency by the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling pathway in rat airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000;23(2):175–81. 10.1165/ajrcmb.23.2.4022 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wyatt TA. Cyclic GMP and Cilia Motility. Cells. 2015;4(3):315–30. 10.3390/cells4030315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sackner MA, Hirsch J, Epstein S. Effect of cuffed endotracheal tubes on tracheal mucous velocity. Chest. 1975;68(6):774–7. 10.1378/chest.68.6.774 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O’Riordan TG, Mao Y, Otero R, Lopez J, Sabater JR, Abraham WM. Budesonide affects allergic mucociliary dysfunction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998;85(3):1086–91. 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.3.1086 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sackner MA, Epstein S, Wanner A. Effect of beta-adrenergic agonists aerosolized by freon propellant on tracheal mucous velocity and cardiac output. Chest. 1976;69(5):593–8. 10.1378/chest.69.5.593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Howlin RP, Cathie K, Hall-Stoodley L, Cornelius V, Duignan C, Allan RN, et al. Low-Dose Nitric Oxide as Targeted Anti-biofilm Adjunctive Therapy to Treat Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Cystic Fibrosis. Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2017;25(9):2104–16. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.06.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kleinbongard P, Dejam A, Lauer T, Rassaf T, Schindler A, Picker O, et al. Plasma nitrite reflects constitutive nitric oxide synthase activity in mammals. Free radical biology & medicine. 2003;35(7):790–6. 10.1016/s0891-5849(03)00406-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sackner MA, Patel S, Adams JA. Changes of blood pressure following initiation of physical inactivity and after external addition of pulses to circulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119(1):201–11. 10.1007/s00421-018-4016-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jerome W Breslin

25 Sep 2019

PONE-D-19-21481

WHOLE BODY PERIODIC ACCELERATION IN NORMAL AND REDUCED MUCOCILIARY CLEARANCE OF CONSCIOUS SHEEP

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Adams,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Nov 09 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jerome W Breslin, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

1. As part of your revision, please complete and submit a copy of the ARRIVE Guidelines checklist, a document that aims to improve experimental reporting and reproducibility of animal studies for purposes of post-publication data analysis and reproducibility: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines. Please include your completed checklist as a Supporting Information file. Note that if your paper is accepted for publication, this checklist will be published as part of your article. Specifically, please include the approval number given to your study by your ethics committee; the source of the animals used in your study; methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia; efforts to alleviate suffering; and what the disposition of the animals was at the end of the study (eg. method of euthanasia, were returned to the herd).

2. Thank you for including your competing interests statement; "I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests:

The following Authors SJ,AW have declared that no competing interests exist JAA owns minimal number of stocks in Noninvasive Monitoring Systems (NIMS), a company which manufactures a platform similar to the one described in this study, and co-patent owner of Gentle Jogger. MAS is president of Sackner Wellness Products, a company which manufactures a wellness device called Gentle Jogger referenced in the manuscript, and co-patent owner. This does not alter our adherence to PLoS OnE policies on sharing data and materials. "

We note that you have a patent relating to material pertinent to this article. Please provide an amended statement of Competing Interests to declare this patent (with details including name and number), along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development or modified products etc. Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The study measured tracheal mucus velocity (TMV), a marker of mucociliary clearance (MCC) using whole body periodic acceleration (WBPA). TMV measurements were determined before (basal) and after WBPA at different time points. L-NAME was used to rule out the possibility of nitric oxide (NO) generation and its involvement in WBPA. Authors also studied whether WBPA could reverse the decrease in TMV caused by inhaled human neutrophil elastase (HNE), a model of abnormal MCC. L-NAME also modified HNE-induced depression in TMV.

The findings of the present study support the hypothesis and confirm previous work demonstrating that WBPA can stimulate NOS activity and NO production. Manuscript is well written and interesting. Methods section is clear and explained in detail. The authors appropriately cite past literature with similar findings/experimental conditions to theirs. They have also tried to put their findings into a clinical context.

A few issues, however, need to be addressed:

- Specific statistical test used for each figure should be included in the figure legend.

- Tracheal mucus velocity (TMV) was used in the current study as an index of MCC. How changes in TMV correlate with whole-lung clearance? Please explain.

- Fig. 1 shows TMV modulation by WPBA-mediated NO production over a 2 h period post-WBPA. Did the authors try to get data for 2 other additional hours (time point 4 h)? Since there is a decrease in TMV values from 1 to 2 h, I am wondering if values would continue decreasing over time which might indicate a lack of NO production due to substrate depletion (decreasing NO bioavailability).

- Experimental plan shown in Figs 3&4 was prolonged for 4 hours. Were there any signs of irritation and/or drying of the airway from the beginning to the end of the experiments?

- Authors conclude (page 13, line 282) that NO released into the circulation from eNOS via pulsatile flow as a consequence of WBPA accesses the airway epithelium and improves MCC; this is based on pharmacological inhibition with L-NAME (a broad NO inhibitor) rather than direct eNO measurements. Is there any evidence for iNOS or nNOS involvement under these experimental conditions?

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by Sabater et al. describes the use of whole body periodic acceleration (WBPA) to enhance endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production which in turn increases mucociliary clearance (MCC). This approach can potentially be of significant benefit to patients with cystic fibrosis and other inflammatory lung diseases as a means of enhancing host defense against pathogens. A model of cystic fibrosis in sheep was established via administration of aerosolized human neutrophil elastase (HNE) which suppresses tracheal mucus velocity (TMV) which is a reflection of mucociliary clearance (MCC). The model established represents an acute model of lung inflammation and is appropriate for this study.

The significance of this work is the fact that other nitric oxide (NO) donors drugs increase ciliary beat frequency of

nasal epithelium without increasing mucociliary clearance but WPA clearly increases MCC. This is possibly due to the fact that the NO release is more significant as WPA increases endothelial NO throughout the body. Mechanistically, they also clearly show that this is a NO dependent phenomenon and L-NAME blunts this effect. Overall, this is a well designed study that clearly shows benefit from a simple non-invasive technique to temporarily increase NO levels and NO released systemically impacts the airways.

Concerns relate to the duration of WPA and the lack of discussion regarding shorter/longer duration. Can you quantify, systemic increase in NO levels? Adding discussion regarding why this technique outperforms other NO donor drugs may also help. Also,wouldn't continual administration of HNE represent a situation similar to that seen in inflammatory lung diseases?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Palaniappan Sethu

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224764.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


2 Oct 2019

Response to reviewers

Reviewer #1:

We thank the reviewer for his/her laudatory comments on the scientific merit, content and writing of the manuscript and the acknowledgement of clinical utility.

A few issues, however, need to be addressed:

- Specific statistical test used for each figure should be included in the figure legend.

For an unknown reason, these were not uploaded to the manuscript submitted, they are now included in the legend.

- Tracheal mucus velocity (TMV) was used in the current study as an index of MCC. How changes in TMV correlate with whole-lung clearance? Please explain.

TMV reflects changes in whole lung clearance measured with radioactive labeled human serum albumin.(1, 2)

- Fig. 1 shows TMV modulation by WPBA-mediated NO production over a 2 h period post-WBPA. Did the authors try to get data for 2 other additional hours (time point 4 h)? Since there is a decrease in TMV values from 1 to 2 h, I am wondering if values would continue decreasing over time which might indicate a lack of NO production due to substrate depletion (decreasing NO bioavailability).

Low arginine bioavailability plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of a growing number of varied diseases, including sickle cell disease, thalassemia, malaria, acute asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, and trauma, among others. Catabolism of arginine by arginase enzymes is the most common cause of an acquired arginine deficiency syndrome, frequently contributing to endothelial dysfunction and/or T‐cell dysfunction, depending on the clinical scenario and disease state. (3) None of these factors would be expected in healthy sheep. However, the duration of effects on TMV requires further study and was not addressed.

- Experimental plan shown in Figs 3&4 was prolonged for 4 hours. Were there any signs of irritation and/or drying of the airway from the beginning to the end of the experiments?

There were no obvious signs of airway irritation (coughing or hypersecretion) observed throughout the study. In order to reduce the effects of airway desiccation the animal was placed on room temperature humidify air between measurements

- Authors conclude (page 13, line 282) that NO released into the circulation from eNOS via pulsatile flow as a consequence of WBPA accesses the airway epithelium and improves MCC; this is based on pharmacological inhibition with L-NAME (a broad NO inhibitor) rather than direct eNO measurements. Is there any evidence for iNOS or nNOS involvement under these experimental conditions?

As mentioned by reviewer L-NAME also inhibits nNOS which is constitutively present in the mucous cells of the epithelium. (4) In rats. eNOS is phosphorylated at Ser-1177. eNOS phosphorylation (Ser-1177) was increased to 261% of control by 1 h of WBPA (360 cpm). Compared to controls, a single 1-h exposure to WBPA (360 cpm) increased the protein level of eNOS in the heart by 393 ± 85% and 461 ± 78% at 4 and 24 h, respectively. The increases of nNOS were 167 ± 9% and 189 ± 36% at 4 and 24 h, respectively. Consistent with these results, mRNA levels of eNOS and nNOS were also significantly increased by WBPA at a frequency of 600 cpm which caused a more sustained increase of eNOS at 4 and 24 h, 392 ± 46% and 534 ± 57% but significantly less induction of nNOS levels (135 ± 19% at 4 h and no change at 24 h compared to WBPA at a frequency of 360 cpm. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was not detected in control or with WBPA at either frequency. Moreover, we did not measure nNOS in airway epithelium with administration of WBPA.

Reviewer #2:

We thank the reviewer for their acknowledgement on our study design and clarity of our findings.

The significance of this work is the fact that other nitric oxide (NO) donors drugs increase ciliary beat frequency of nasal epithelium without increasing mucociliary clearance but WPA clearly increases MCC. This is possibly due to the fact that the NO release is more significant as WPA increases endothelial NO throughout the body. Mechanistically, they also clearly show that this is a NO dependent phenomenon and L-NAME blunts this effect. Overall, this is a well-designed study that clearly shows benefit from a simple non-invasive technique to temporarily increase NO levels and NO released systemically impacts the airways.

Concerns relate to the duration of WPA and the lack of discussion regarding shorter/longer duration. Can you quantify systemic increase in NO levels? Adding discussion regarding why this technique outperforms other NO donor drugs may also help.

The action of WBPA releasing NO into circulation as measured by descent of the dicrotic notch of finger pulse of humans begins within 15 to 25 seconds after beginning WBPA. (5) The duration of NO action is complicated because NO rapidly binds to circulating proteins and is slowly released to the body in a heterogeneous manner. The effects of 1 hr of WBPA on eNOS expression and phosphorylation have been previously published in rats and mice (6, 7)

We could not find any references to NO donor drugs on MCC in airways and cannot respond to question as to difference in performance. Runer and Lindberg showed increases in ciliary beating frequencies with nitroprusside on human nasal mucosa. (8)

We could not quantify acute systemic increases of NO as reflected by others using serum nitrite measurements because of inconsistent results present in our attempts to make this measurement.

Also, wouldn't continual administration of HNE represent a situation similar to that seen in inflammatory lung diseases?

This is an interesting observation and a reasonable possibility; however we have not attempted to do so, since our sheep model is not a terminal model. Prolonged administration of HNE, may in fact produce a very severe inflammatory lung disease from which there is no survival

Reference

1. Hirsh AJ, Zhang J, Zamurs A, Fleegle J, Thelin WR, Caldwell RA, et al. Pharmacological properties of N-(3,5-diamino-6-chloropyrazine-2-carbonyl)-N'-4-[4-(2,3-dihydroxypropoxy)phenyl] butyl-guanidine methanesulfonate (552-02), a novel epithelial sodium channel blocker with potential clinical efficacy for cystic fibrosis lung disease. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2008;325(1):77-88. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.130443. PubMed PMID: 18218832.

2. Sabater JR, Mao YM, Shaffer C, James MK, O'Riordan TG, Abraham WM. Aerosolization of P2Y(2)-receptor agonists enhances mucociliary clearance in sheep. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;87(6):2191-6. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.6.2191. PubMed PMID: 10601167.

3. Morris CR, Hamilton-Reeves J, Martindale RG, Sarav M, Ochoa Gautier JB. Acquired Amino Acid Deficiencies: A Focus on Arginine and Glutamine. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017;32(1_suppl):30S-47S. doi: 10.1177/0884533617691250. PubMed PMID: 28388380.

4. Donaldson SH, Bennett WD, Zeman KL, Knowles MR, Tarran R, Boucher RC. Mucus clearance and lung function in cystic fibrosis with hypertonic saline. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;354(3):241-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043891. PubMed PMID: 16421365.

5. Sackner MA, Gummels E, Adams JA. Nitric oxide is released into circulation with whole-body, periodic acceleration. Chest. 2005;127(1):30-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.1.30. PubMed PMID: 15653959.

6. Wu H, Jin Y, Arias J, Bassuk J, Uryash A, Kurlansky P, et al. In vivo upregulation of nitric oxide synthases in healthy rats. Nitric Oxide. 2009;21(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2009.05.004. PubMed PMID: 19481168; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3135669.

7. Uryash A, Bassuk J, Kurlansky P, Altamirano F, Lopez JR, Adams JA. Antioxidant Properties of Whole Body Periodic Acceleration (pGz). PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131392. PubMed PMID: 26133377; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4489838.

8. Runer T, Lindberg S. Effects of nitric oxide on blood flow and mucociliary activity in the human nose. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;107(1):40-6. doi: 10.1177/000348949810700108. PubMed PMID: 9439387.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Jerome W Breslin

22 Oct 2019

WHOLE BODY PERIODIC ACCELERATION IN NORMAL AND REDUCED MUCOCILIARY CLEARANCE OF CONSCIOUS SHEEP

PONE-D-19-21481R1

Dear Dr. Adams,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Jerome W Breslin, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for taking the time to respond to my questions. Authors have adequately addressed all comments.

Reviewer #2: All previously raised concerns were adequately addressed. The PI has either provided references or clarified via response to the initial review.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Palaniappan Sethu

Acceptance letter

Jerome W Breslin

29 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-21481R1

Whole Body Periodic Acceleration in Normal and Reduced Mucociliary Clearance of Conscious Sheep.

Dear Dr. Adams:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jerome W Breslin

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. The ARRIVE guidelines checklist.

    This table contains the ARRIVE guidelines checklist for animal research reporting for in vivo experiments.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES