Heparin is the anticoagulant of choice when a rapid anticoagulant is indicated: Onset of action is immediate when administered IV as a bolus.1 The major anticoagulant effect of heparin is mediated by heparin/antithrombin (AT) interaction. Heparin/AT inactivates factor IIa (thrombin) and factors Xa, IXa, XIa, and XIIa. Heparin is approved for multiple indications, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and prophylaxis of medical and surgical patients; stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF); acute coronary syndrome (ACS); vascular and cardiac surgeries; and various interventional procedures (eg, diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]). It also is used as an anticoagulant in blood transfusions, extracorporeal circulation, and for maintaining patency of central vascular access devices (CVADs).
About 60% of the crude heparin used to manufacture heparin in the US originates in China, derived from porcine mucosa. African swine fever, a contagious virus with no cure, has eliminated about 25% to 35% of China’s pig population, or about 150 million pigs. In July 2019, members of the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce sent a letter to the US Food and Drug Administration asking for details on the potential impact of African swine fever on the supply of heparin.2
The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) heath care system is currently experiencing a shortage of heparin vials and syringes. It is unclear when resolution of this shortage will occur as it could resolve within several weeks or as late as January 2020.3 Although vials and syringes are the current products that are affected, it is possible the shortage may eventually include IV heparin bags as well.
Since the foremost objective of VA health care providers is to provide timely access to medications for veterans, strategies to conserve unfractionated heparin (UfH) must be used since it is a first-line therapy where few evidence-based alternatives exist. Conservation strategies may include drug rationing, therapeutic substitution, and compounding of needed products using the limited stock available in the pharmacy.4 It is important that all staff are educated on facility strategies in order to be familiar with alternatives and limit the potential for near misses, adverse events, and provider frustration.
In shortage situations, the VA-Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) defers decisions regarding drug preservation, processes to shift to viable alternatives, and the best practice for safe transitions to local facilities and their subject matter experts.5 At the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, a 1A, tertiary, dual campus health care system, a pharmacy task force has formed to track drug shortages impacting the facility’s efficiencies and budgets. This group communicates with the Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee about potential risks to patient care and develops shortage briefs (following an SBAR [situation, background, assessment, recommendation] design) generally authored and championed by at least 1 clinical pharmacy specialist and supervising physicians who are field experts. Prior to dissemination, the SBAR undergoes a rapid peer-review process.
To date, VA PBM has not issued specific guidance on how pharmacists should proceed in case of a shortage. However, we recommend strategies that may be considered for implementation during a potential UfH shortage. For example, pharmacists can use therapeutic alternatives for which best available evidence suggests no disadvantage.4 The Table lists alternative agents according to indication and patient-specific considerations that may preclude use. Existing UfH products may also be used for drug compounding (eg, use current stock to provide an indicated aliquot) to meet the need of prioritized patients.4 In addition, we suggest prioritizing current UfH/heparinized saline for use for the following groups of patients4:
TABLE.
Anticoagulation Therapeutic Substitution by Specific Diagnosis or Procedure
| Indications for Use | Substitutions | Recommended Dosing | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infusion therapy: Flushing and locking (peripheral catheters,16 midline catheters, PICC, nontunneled CVAD, ports) | Preservative free 0.9% sodium chloride (USP) | Flushing volume: twice internal volume of catheter system Locking volume: internal volume of catheter plus 20% |
Use pharmacy-prepared or commercially available prefilled syringes of appropriate IV solution to flush and lock vascular access devices; CAUTION: If bacteriostatic 0.9% sodium chloride is used, limit flush volume to 30 mL in 24 h to reduce the possible toxic effects from the preservative benzyl chloride16 |
| Bridging anticoagulation (no history of HIT/HITTS)18–20 | Enoxaparin | CrCL > 30 mL/min: 1 mg/kg q12h | CAUTION: Only for high-risk patients (eg, mechanical mitral valve) |
| ACS21–23 | Bivalirudin (preprocedural, first line in an invasive approach) | Bolus: 0.10 mg/kg then CI: 0.25 mg/kg/h Ward standardized concentration: 250 mg/500 mL or 0.5 mg/mL |
CAUTION: Consider dose adjustment for CrCl < 30 mL/min; discuss with cardiology24; NOTE: Depending on facility experience, may also consider argatroban |
| Enoxaparin (preprocedural, second line in an invasive approach of STEMI) | STEMI, CrCl > 30 mL/min, aged < 75 y: 1 mg/kg SC q12h (maximum: 100 mg SC for first 2 doses only) STEMI, CrCl > 30 mL/min, aged ≥ 75 y: 0.75 mg/kg SC q12 (maximum: 75 mg SC q12h, for the first 2 doses only) NSTE ACS (not preferred for invasive approach): CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min: 1 mg/kg SC q2h NOTE: Bivalirudin is preferred when CrCl is < 60 mL/min |
ALERT: Do not use enoxaparin or any low-molecular-weight heparin if patient may proceed to cardiac surgery since the last dose must be given 24 h prior to surgery25; CAUTION: Discuss with cardiology if 30 mg IV loading dose is desired in STEMI, for those aged < 75 y; Must know number of doses and timing of last enoxaparin dose before proceeding to LHC/PCI; IV bolus and SC dosing are separated by 15 min |
|
| Fondaparinux (medical management only) | CrCl > 30 mL/min: 2.5 mg daily NOTE: Initial dose is IV; all subsequent are SC |
CAUTION: Discuss use with cardiology since patient will require an additional anticoagulant with anti-IIa activity if PCI is performed to avert catheter thrombosis | |
| VTE26,27 | Enoxaparin | CrCl > 30 mL/min: 1 mg/kg SC q12h (preferred) or 1.5 mg/kg SC q24h CrCl 15–30 mL/min: 1 mg/kg q24h |
Consider transitioning to an oral agent that does not require initial heparin therapy (eg, apixaban) if patient is appropriate |
| Fondaparinux | If CrCl > 50 mL/min and wt is: < 50 kg: 5 mg SC q24h; 50–100 kg: 7.5 mg SC q24h; >100 kg: 10 mg SC q24h |
Consider transitioning to an oral agent that does not require initial heparin therapy (eg, apixaban, rivaroxaban; not dabigatran) if patient is appropriate; NOTE: Dosing is modified according to wt in kg |
|
| VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic surgical inpatients28,29 | Enoxaparin | Hipa: CrCl > 30 mL/min: 30 mg SC q12h or 40 mg SC q24h; CrCl 15–30 mL/min: 30 mg SC q24h; Knee: CrCl > 30 mL/min: 30 mg SC q12h; CrCl 15–30 mL/min: 30 mg SC q24h |
Start ≥ 12 h postoperatively |
| Fondaparinux | CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min, wt > 50 kg: 2.5 mg SC daily | Start 6–8 h postoperatively | |
| Oral agents | CrCl > 15 mL/min: apixaban 2.5 mg po bid CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min: rivaroxaban 10 mg po q24h CrCl > 30 mL/min: dabigatran 110 mg on day 1, then 220 mg po q24h thereafter |
Start apixaban, 12–24 h postoperatively Start rivaroxaban, 6–10 h postoperatively Start dabigatran 1–4 h postoperatively CAUTION: Start only after hemostasis is established |
|
| VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients without epidurals, chest tubes, or recent cardiac or neurosurgery10,11 | Enoxaparin | Calculate Caprini score (use medication if ≥ 3) and assess bleed risk CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min, wt < 100 kg: 40 mg SC q24h CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min, wt > 100 kg: 40 mg SC q12h CrCl 15–30 mL/min: 30 mg SQ q24h |
Apply sequential compression devices to all patients with a Caprini score ≥ 59; For thoracic and abdominal/pelvic surgeries with malignancy, consider extended prophylaxis (28–30 d)10,30; CAUTION: Start only after hemostasis is established |
| VTE prophylaxis in medical patients with a Padua score ≥ 4 (high VTE risk) and IMPROVE bleeding risk score < 711,12,31 | Enoxaparin | CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min: 40 mg QC q24h CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min and BMI ≥ 40: 30 mg SC q12h CrCl 15–30 mL/min: 30 mg SC q24h |
|
| IHD with PCI in the CCL21–23 | Bivalirudin | Bivalirudin initiated preprocedural: Bolus: 0.5 mg/kg; CI: 1.75 mg/kg/h Transition from heparin: Hold heparin x 30 min, then give: Bolus: 0.75 mg/kg; CI, 1.75 mg/kg/h No anticoagulation preprocedure: Bolus: 0.5–0.75 mg/kg; CI: 1.75 mg/kg/h NOTE: May be used in hemodialysis—adjust rate to 0.25 mg/kg/h |
NOTE: rate is per hour and concentration used on the wards commonly differs from that used in the CCL; CAUTION: For femoral access,32 sheath removal and manual compression can occur at 2 h following completion of the infusion in patients with normal renal function. In patients with a CrCl < 30 mL/min or those on dialysis, the ACT should be checked, and sheaths removed once the value is < 180 sec (conservatively < 150 sec)33 |
| Radial access for LHC (to prevent RAO)34,35 | Bivalirudin | Bolus in LHC (no PCI, diagnostic only): 0.75 mg/kg CI in LHC with PCI: see ACS dosing guide for bolus and CI |
CAUTION: For use in the CCL only; unlike for heparin, there are no bivalirudin dose-ranging studies for RAO prevention |
| STEMI, undergoing PCI and received enoxaparin as initial anticoagulant22 | Enoxaparin | 0.3 mg/kg IV supplement if PCI occurs 8–12 h after last enoxaparin SC dose if treated with multiple doses or has received only 1 therapeutic dose (1 mg/kg) | CAUTION: For use in the CCL only CAUTION: For femoral access, removal of sheaths can occur 8–12 h after the last dose of therapeutic enoxaparin32 |
| Cardiac surgery6 | Bivalirudin | Bolus: 1 mg/kg on-pump, 0.75 mg/kg off-pump; If transitions to on pump, administer additional 0.25 mg/kg bolus and change the CI rate; CI: 2.5 mg/kg/h on-pump, 1.75 mg/kg/h off-pump; prn boluses to keep ACT at target; Pump priming solution: add 50 mg |
CAUTION: For use in the operating room only; NOTE: Rate is per hour |
| Hemodialysis7–9 | RCA in ICU or dalteparin | Dalteparin 5000 units, adjustable in increments or decrements of 500 or 1000 units6 | CAUTION: Will need to monitor for metabolic abnormalities with RCA, best reserved for ICU |
| Hemodialysis (tunneled) CVAD16,36 | Trisodium citrate 4% lock | CAUTION: Use pharmacy-prepared or commercially available prefilled syringes of appropriate IV solution to flush and lock vascular access devices; NOTE: tPA is used once weekly for partially or completely occluded catheters; tPA 2 mg/2 mL in lumen for 30 min to 2 h and repeated once if indicated |
|
| Apheresis CVAD16 | Trisodium citrate 4% lock or acid-citrate-dextrose formula A (ACD-A, which contains 3% citrate) | CAUTION: Use pharmacy-prepared or commercially available prefilled syringes of appropriate IV solution to flush and lock vascular access devices |
Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; ACT, activated clotting time; BL, baseline; BMI, body mass index; CCL, cardiac catheterization laboratory; CI, continuous infusion; CrCl, creatinine clearance; CVAD, central vascular access device; HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; HITTS, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome; ICU, intensive care unit; IHD; ischemic heart disease (stable and unstable disease); IMPROVE, International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism; IV, intravenous; LHC, left heart cardiac catheterization; NSTE ACS, Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention (eg, stenting); PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; RAO, radial artery occulsion; RCA, regional citrate anticoagulation; SC, subcutaneous; SQH, subcutaneous heparin; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; VTE, venous thromboembolism; WT, weight.
Hip arthroplasty or fracture.
Hemodialysis patients1,7–9 for which the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin is deemed inappropriate or the patient is not monitored in the intensive care unit for regional citrate administration;
VTE prophylaxis for patients with epidurals or chest tubes for which urgent invasive management may occur, recent cardiac or neurosurgery, or for patients with a creatine clearance < 15 mL/min or receiving hemodialysis10–12;
Vascular surgery (eg, limb ischemia) and interventions (eg, carotid stenting, endarterectomy)13,14;
Mesenteric ischemia (venous thrombosis) with a potential to proceed to laparotomy15;
Critically ill patients with arterial lines for which normal saline is deemed inappropriate for line flushing16;
Electrophysiology procedures (eg, AF ablation)17; and
Contraindication to use of a long-acting alternative listed in the table or a medical necessity exists for using a rapidly reversible agent. Examples for this category include but are not limited to recent gastrointestinal bleeding, central nervous system lesion, and select neurologic diagnoses (eg, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with hemorrhage, thrombus in vertebral basilar system or anterior circulation, intraparenchymal hemorrhage plus mechanical valve, medium to large cardioembolic stroke with intracardiac thrombus).
CONCLUSION
The UfH drug shortage represents a significant threat to public health and is a major challenge for US health care systems, including the Veterans Health Administration. Over-reliance on a predominant source of crude heparin has affected multiple UfH manufacturers and products. Current alternatives to UfH include low-molecular-weight heparins, IV direct thrombin inhibitors, and SC fondaparinux, with selection supported by guidelines or evolving literature. However, the shortage has the potential to expand to other injectables, such as dalteparin and enoxaparin, and severely limit care for veterans. It is vital that clinicians rapidly address the current shortage by creating a plan to develop efficient and equitable access to UfH, continue to assess supply and update stakeholders, and select evidence-based alternatives while maintaining focus on efficacy and safety.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ashley Yost, PharmD, for her coordination of the multidisciplinary task force assigned to efficiently manage the heparin drug shortage. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System in Nashville, Tennessee.
Footnotes
Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.
References
- 1.Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, et al. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 2001;119(1):64S–94S. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.64s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bipartisan E&C leaders request FDA briefing on threat to U.S. heparin supply [press release] Washington, DC: House Committee on Energy and Commerce; Jul 30, 2019. [Accessed September 19, 2019]. https://energycommerce.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/bipartisan-ec-leaders-request-fda-briefing-on-threat-to-us-heparin-supply. [Google Scholar]
- 3.American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Drug Shortages. Heparin injection. [Accessed September 19, 2019]. https://www.ashp.org/Drug-Shortages/Current-Shortages/Drug-Shortages-List?page=CurrentShortages.
- 4.Reed BN, Fox ER, Konig M, et al. The impact of drug shortages on patients with cardiovascular disease: causes, consequences, and a call to action. Am Heart J. 2016;175:130–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.US Department of Veterans Affairs. Pharmacy Benefits Management Services, Medical Advisory Panel, VISN Pharmacist Executives, The Center For Medication Safety. Heparin supply status: frequently asked questions. PBM-2018-02. [Accessed September 11, 2019]. https://www.pbm.va.gov/PBM/vacenterformedicationsafety/HeparinandSalineSyringeRecallDuetoContamination_NationalPBMPati.pdf. Published May 3, 2018.
- 6.Shore-Lesserson I, Baker RA, Ferraris VA, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines-anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(2):650–662. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.09.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Soroka S, Agharazii M, Donnelly S, et al. An adjustable dalteparin sodium dose regimen for the prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit in hemodialysis: a clinical trial of safety and efficacy (the PARROT Study) Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018;5:1–12. doi: 10.1177/2054358118809104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shantha GPS, Kumar AA, Sethi M, Khanna RC, Pancholy SB. Efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin for chronic outpatient hemodialysis in end stage renal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Peer J. 2015;3:e835. doi: 10.7717/peerj.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kessler M, Moureau F, Nguyen P. Anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis: progress toward an optimal approach. Semin Dial. 2015;28(5):474–489. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 suppl):e227s–e277S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kaye AD, Brunk AJ, Kaye AJ, et al. Regional anesthesia in patients on anticoagulation therapies—evidence-based recommendations. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(9):67. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0805-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS, et al. Prevention of VTE in non-surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 suppl):e195S–e226S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, et al. Management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:3–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. JACC. 2017;69(11):e71–e126. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bjorck M, Koelemaya M, Acosta S, et al. Management of diseases of mesenteric arteries and veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(4):460–510. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gorski L, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, McGoldrick M, Orr M, Doellman D. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infusion Nurs. 2016;39:S1–S156. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–e444. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Spyropoulos AC, Al-Badri A, Sherwood MW, Douketis JD. Periprocedural management of patients receiving a vitamin K antagonist or a direct oral anticoagulant requiring an elective procedure or surgery. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(5):875–885. doi: 10.1111/jth.13305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wysokinski WE, McBane RD., II Periprocedural bridging management of anticoagulation. Circulation. 2012;126(4):486–490. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.092833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Spencer FA, et al. Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 suppl):e326S–e350S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sousa-Uva M, Neumann F-J, Ahlsson A, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with a special contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55(1):4–90. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. JACC. 2014;64(24):e139–e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JACC. 2013;61(4):e78–e140. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Angiomax [package insert] Parsippany, NJ: The Medicines Company; Mar, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sousa-Uva, Head SJ, Milojevic M, et al. 2017 EACTS guidelines on perioperative medication in adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(1):5–33. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Witt DM, Nieuwlaat R, Clark NP, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for the management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy. Blood Adv. 2018;2(22):3257–3291. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kearon C, Akl EA, Blaivas A, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Chest guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2016;149(2):315–352. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.US Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacy Benefits Manager Service. Direct oral anticoagulants criteria for use and algorithm for venous thromboembolism treatment. https://www.pbm.va.gov/PBM/clinicalguidance/criteriaforuse.asp. Updated December 2016. [Source not verified]
- 29.Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 suppl):e278S–e325S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raja S, Idrees JJ, Blackstone EH, et al. Routine venous thromboembolism screening after pneumonectomy: the more you look, the more you see. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(2):524–532.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schünemann HJ, Cushman M, Burnett AE, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients. Blood Adv. 2018;2(22):3198–3225. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018022954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Naidu SS, Aronow HD, Box LC, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement: 2016 best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory:(endorsed by the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencionista; affirmation of value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention) Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(3):407–423. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. JACC. 2011;58(24):e44–e122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, et al. American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine. AHA scientific statement: an update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):e000035. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rao SV, Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, et al. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention’s Transradial Working Group. Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions’ transradial working group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(2):228–236. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moran JE, Ash SR. Locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters; heparin and citrate: a position paper by ASDIN. Semin Dial. 2008;21(5):490–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00466.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
