Skip to main content
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report logoLink to Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
. 2019 Nov 8;68(44):999–1005. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6844e1

Vital Signs: Estimated Proportion of Adult Health Problems Attributable to Adverse Childhood Experiences and Implications for Prevention — 25 States, 2015–2017

Melissa T Merrick 1, Derek C Ford 1, Katie A Ports 1, Angie S Guinn 1, Jieru Chen 2, Joanne Klevens 1, Marilyn Metzler 1, Christopher M Jones 3, Thomas R Simon 1,, Valerie M Daniel 1, Phyllis Ottley 1, James A Mercy 1
PMCID: PMC6837472  PMID: 31697656

Abstract

Introduction

Adverse childhood experiences, such as violence victimization, substance misuse in the household, or witnessing intimate partner violence, have been linked to leading causes of adult morbidity and mortality. Therefore, reducing adverse childhood experiences is critical to avoiding multiple negative health and socioeconomic outcomes in adulthood.

Methods

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data were collected from 25 states that included state-added adverse childhood experience items during 2015–2017. Outcomes were self-reported status for coronary heart disease, stroke, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer (excluding skin cancer), kidney disease, diabetes, depression, overweight or obesity, current smoking, heavy drinking, less than high school completion, unemployment, and lack of health insurance. Logistic regression modeling adjusting for age group, race/ethnicity, and sex was used to calculate population attributable fractions representing the potential reduction in outcomes associated with preventing adverse childhood experiences.

Results

Nearly one in six adults in the study population (15.6%) reported four or more types of adverse childhood experiences. Adverse childhood experiences were significantly associated with poorer health outcomes, health risk behaviors, and socioeconomic challenges. Potential percentage reductions in the number of observed cases as indicated by population attributable fractions ranged from 1.7% for overweight or obesity to 23.9% for heavy drinking, 27.0% for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 44.1% for depression.

Conclusions and implications for public health practice

Efforts that prevent adverse childhood experiences could also potentially prevent adult chronic conditions, depression, health risk behaviors, and negative socioeconomic outcomes. States can use comprehensive public health approaches derived from the best available evidence to prevent childhood adversity before it begins. By creating the conditions for healthy communities and focusing on primary prevention, it is possible to reduce risk for adverse childhood experiences while also mitigating consequences for those already affected by these experiences.

Introduction

Healthy child development contributes to overall population health and prosperity. Decades of research have shown that exposure to violence in childhood (e.g., physical, sexual, or psychological) and witnessing potentially traumatic experiences in the home (e.g., intimate partner violence, mental illness, or substance misuse), collectively referred to as adverse childhood experiences, can have profound and lasting negative effects on health and social outcomes (18). Given the connection between adverse childhood experiences and health, preventing these experiences is strategic for reducing several of the leading causes of adult morbidity and mortality.

Adverse childhood experiences are common and have important implications for health and well-being (6,9). Whereas everyone is at risk for adverse childhood experiences, numerous studies have documented inequities in such experiences attributed to the historical, social, and economic environments in which some families live (911).

Exposure to adverse childhood experiences can be traumatic, evoking toxic stress responses that have immediate and long-term adverse physiologic and psychologic impacts. These adverse childhood experiences can derail optimal health and development by altering gene expression, brain connectivity and function, immune system function, and organ function (8). Adverse childhood experiences can also compromise development of healthy coping strategies, which can affect health behaviors, physical and mental health, life opportunities, and premature death (18,12). Adverse childhood experiences have been linked to increased risk for alcohol and substance use disorders, suicide, mental health conditions, heart disease, other chronic illnesses, and health risk behaviors throughout life. Adverse childhood experiences have also been linked to reduced educational attainment, employment, and income, which directly and indirectly affect health and well-being (18). At least five of the 10 leading causes of death have been associated with exposure to adverse childhood experiences, including several contributors to declines in life expectancy (6,13).

Adverse childhood experiences are preventable (1416). Randomized controlled and matched-group trials have demonstrated 48%–52% reductions in rates of child abuse and neglect associated with preschool enrichment and early childhood home visitation programs (14,15). Preventing adverse childhood experiences is critical to addressing multiple public health and social challenges and to improving the lives of children, families, and communities. To understand the potential impact of preventing adverse childhood experiences in reducing negative health and well-being outcomes, state survey data were used to estimate population attributable fractions representing potential percentage reductions in the number of observed cases of health conditions, health risk behaviors, and socioeconomic impacts.

Methods

The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)* is a state-based telephone survey of noninstitutionalized adults administered annually within each state, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. Participants report on a range of health conditions and risk behaviors. During the 2015–2017 data collection years, 27 states included state-added adverse childhood experience questions, in addition to the standardized set of BRFSS questions. These 11 state-added questions assess exposure to eight types of adverse childhood experiences: three types of abuse (physical, emotional, and sexual) and five types of household challenges (household member substance misuse, incarceration, mental illness, parental divorce, or witnessing intimate partner violence) before age 18 years. The adverse childhood experience items administered on the California and New Hampshire BRFSS surveys were inconsistent with those administered by the other states and were excluded, leaving 25 states in these analyses. Data were collected from 144,017 respondents who answered all adverse childhood experience questions and provided responses for age, race/ethnicity, and sex. Each respondent was classified into one of the following adverse childhood experience exposure categories based on the number of adverse childhood experience types reported: zero, one, two or three, and four or more types of adverse childhood experience exposure. The content and scoring of BRFSS adverse childhood experience items have been previously described (17).

Associations between outcomes and adverse childhood experience exposure were assessed. Coronary heart disease, stroke, asthma, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer (excluding skin cancer), kidney disease, diabetes, and depression were measured by asking respondents whether they had ever been told by a health care professional that they had the condition. Body mass index (BMI), calculated from self-reported height and weight, was used to determine each participant’s overweight or obesity status (overweight defined as BMI of ≥25 kg/m2; obesity defined as BMI of ≥30 kg/m2). Current smoking was defined as lifetime smoking of at least 100 cigarettes and currently smoking on at least some days. Heavy drinking was defined as adult men consuming at least 15 alcoholic beverages per week or adult women consuming at least eight alcoholic beverages per week in the past 30 days. Socioeconomic challenges included current lack of health insurance, current unemployment status, and attainment of less than a high school diploma or equivalent education.

As a preliminary step, the frequency distributions, including weighted percentages and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of adverse childhood experience exposure by sociodemographic characteristics, were estimated. The overall bivariate associations between adverse childhood experience score and each sociodemographic variable were subsequently tested using chi-squared tests of independence. Logistic regression models were used to quantify the associations between adverse childhood experience exposure and each of the health outcomes, health risk behaviors, and socioeconomic challenges. All models were adjusted for race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white [white], non-Hispanic black [black], non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native [AI/AN], non-Hispanic Asian [Asian], Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other [Other]§); sex (male or female); and age group (18–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and ≥65 years). Population attributable fractions, adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and sex, were estimated using the predicted probabilities from the models to ascertain the percentage reduction in the number of observed cases of each outcome that would be expected if adverse childhood experience exposure were incrementally reduced or eliminated in the study population (18). R (version 3.6.0; R Core Team) was used for all analyses and accounted for the complex survey design. Response rates for the states analyzed ranged from 30.6% to 59.0%.

Results

Overall, 60.9% of adults in the study population experienced at least one type of adverse childhood experience, and 15.6% experienced four or more types (Table 1). Sex, race/ethnicity, and age group were independently associated with adverse childhood experience exposure. Women, AI/AN, blacks, and the Other racial/ethnic group were more likely to experience four or more types of adverse childhood experiences than were men and whites. Younger adults reported exposure to more adverse childhood experience types than did older adults, particularly those aged ≥65 years.

TABLE 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of adults in the study population by adverse childhood experience score* — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 25 states, 2015–2017.

Characteristic Adverse childhood experience score
0
1
2–3
≥4
No. %§ (95% CI) No. %§ (95% CI) No. %§ (95% CI) No. %§ (95% CI)
Sex
Men
26,852
39.3 (38.5–40.0)
14,590
24.7 (24.0–25.3)
12,340
22.2 (21.5–22.8)
6,781
13.9 (13.4–14.5)
Women
36,513
38.8 (38.2–39.5)
18,570
22.3 (21.7–22.9)
16,802
21.7 (21.1–22.3)
11,569
17.1 (16.6–17.7)
Age group (yrs)
18–24
2,178
29.5 (27.7–31.3)
1,763
24.3 (22.6–25.9)
1,768
25.0 (23.4–26.7)
1,456
21.2 (19.6–22.7)
25–34
3,961
30.5 (29.2–31.9)
2,878
22.9 (21.6–24.2)
3,030
24.8 (23.5–26.1)
2,654
21.8 (20.5–23.1)
35–44
5,617
35.0 (33.7–36.4)
3,711
23.1 (21.9–24.3)
3,663
23.1 (22.0–24.3)
2,998
18.7 (17.7–19.8)
45–54
8,797
37.5 (36.3–38.7)
5,332
23.5 (22.5–24.5)
5,206
22.9 (21.9–24.0)
3,685
16.1 (15.2–17.0)
55–64
13,984
41.4 (40.4–42.5)
7,451
23.3 (22.3–24.2)
6,883
21.6 (20.7–22.4)
4,099
13.7 (13.0–14.5)
≥65
28,828
52.1 (51.3–53.0)
12,025
23.7 (23.0–24.5)
8,592
16.9 (16.2–17.5)
3,458
7.3 (6.8–7.7)
Race/Ethnicity¶,**
White
52,614
40.2 (39.7–40.7)
26,451
23.1 (22.7–23.6)
22,855
21.7 (21.2–22.2)
13,934
15.0 (14.6–15.4)
Black
4,591
32.0 (30.5–33.5)
3,209
26.4 (24.9–27.8)
2,782
24.0 (22.6–25.4)
1,498
17.7 (16.3–19.0)
American Indian/Alaska Native
838
28.8 (24.6–32.9)
588
21.2 (17.2–25.3)
677
21.6 (17.3–25.9)
726
28.3 (24.1–32.6)
Asian
1,038
56.3 (52.5–60.1)
350
19.8 (16.8–22.8)
283
15.3 (12.7–17.9)
116
8.6 (5.9–11.2)
Hispanic
3,434
38.2 (36.3–40.1)
1,953
23.2 (21.6–24.9)
1,891
22.7 (21.1–24.3)
1,349
15.8 (14.5–17.2)
Other
850
25.5 (22.1–28.9)
609
24.2 (20.7–27.7)
654
22.3 (19.4–25.1)
727
28.0 (24.7–31.4)
Total 63,365 39.0 (38.6–39.5) 33,160 23.4 (23.0–23.9) 29,142 21.9 (21.5–22.4) 18,350 15.6 (15.2–16.0)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Based on the number of adverse childhood experience types reported.

States with state-added adverse childhood experience questions: Alaska, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas (2015); Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Utah (2016); Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin (2017).

§ Percentages are weighted estimates; analyzed data are from 25 states with state-added adverse childhood experience questions on BRFSS.

p<0.001 from chi-squared test of independence.

** Participants self-reporting as white, black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, and Other (Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, multiracial, or other) were non-Hispanic; Hispanic participants could be of any race.

Logistic regression analysis of the association between adverse childhood experience exposure and the health outcomes examined found that adults with the highest level of adverse childhood experience exposure had higher odds of having chronic health conditions, with adjusted odds ratios (AORs) ranging from 1.2 (95% CI = 1.1–1.3) for overweight or obesity to 2.8 (95% CI = 2.5–3.1) for COPD, compared with those reporting no adverse childhood experience exposure (Table 2). After adjusting for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, odds of depression (AOR = 5.3, 95% CI = 4.9–5.7), being a current smoker (AOR = 3.1, 95% CI = 2.8–3.3) or heavy drinker (AOR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.6–2.0), and socioeconomic challenges including current unemployment (AOR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.5–2.0) were also higher among adults with the highest levels of adverse childhood experience exposure, compared with those reporting no adverse childhood experience exposure.

TABLE 2. Association between adverse childhood experience score*,† and health conditions, health risk behaviors, and socioeconomic challenges — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 25 states,§ 2015–2017.

Outcome Adverse childhood experience score
1
2–3
≥4
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Chronic condition
Coronary heart disease
1.1 (1.0–1.3)
1.2 (1.1–1.4)
1.8 (1.6–2.1)
Stroke
1.1 (1.0–1.3)
1.3 (1.2–1.5)
2.1 (1.7–2.5)
Asthma
1.3 (1.2–1.4)
1.6 (1.4–1.7)
2.2 (2.0–2.4)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
1.3 (1.1–1.4)
1.7 (1.5–1.9)
2.8 (2.5–3.1)
Cancer (excluding skin)
1.1 (1.0–1.1)
1.2 (1.1–1.3)
1.4 (1.2–1.6)
Kidney disease
1.2 (1.0–1.4)
1.3 (1.2–1.6)
1.7 (1.4–2.0)
Diabetes
1.0 (0.9–1.1)
1.1 (1.1–1.2)
1.4 (1.2–1.5)
Overweight or obesity
1.0 (0.9–1.1)
1.1 (1.0–1.2)
1.2 (1.1–1.3)
Mental health
Depression
1.6 (1.5–1.7)
2.6 (2.4–2.8)
5.3 (4.9–5.7)
Health risk behavior
Current smoker
1.4 (1.3–1.6)
1.9 (1.8–2.1)
3.1 (2.8–3.3)
Heavy drinker
1.3 (1.2–1.5)
1.6 (1.4–1.8)
1.8 (1.6–2.0)
Socioeconomic challenge
Less than high school education
1.0 (0.9–1.1)
1.1 (1.0–1.2)
1.4 (1.3–1.6)
Unemployment
1.1 (0.9–1.3)
1.3 (1.2–1.5)
1.7 (1.5–2.0)
No health insurance 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 1.3 (1.2–1.5)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Based on the number of adverse childhood experience types reported.

Referent group had zero adverse childhood experiences; all models were adjusted for sex, age group, and race/ethnicity.

§ States with state-added adverse childhood experience questions: Alaska, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas (2015), Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Utah (2016); Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin (2017).

Overweight: body mass index ≥25 kg/m2; obesity: body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.

The largest reductions in observed outcomes were estimated to be among the group with the most exposures (four or more types of adverse childhood experiences) across all outcomes (Table 3). The estimated overall percentage reductions in chronic health conditions associated with preventing all adverse childhood experiences ranged from 1.7% for overweight or obesity to 27.0% for COPD. Substantial reductions were also estimated for depression (44.1%), current smoking (32.9%), and heavy drinking (23.9%). The reductions in socioeconomic challenges ranged from 3.8% (lack of health insurance) to 14.9% (unemployment).

TABLE 3. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) for health conditions, health risk behaviors, and socioeconomic challenges, by adverse childhood experience score*,† — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 25 States,§ 2015–2017.

Outcome Adverse childhood experience score
Overall PAF %
1
2–3
≥4
PAF %
Chronic condition
Coronary heart disease
2.6
3.4
6.6
12.6
Stroke
—*
5.0
9.6
14.6
Asthma
4.2
8.1
11.7
24.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
4.1
9.1
13.8
27.0
Cancer (excluding skin)

2.4
3.5
5.9
Kidney disease
3.7
5.5
6.5
15.7
Diabetes

2.2
3.5
5.7
Overweight or obesity

0.7
1.0
1.7
Mental health
Depression
6.4
14.7
23.0
44.1
Health risk behavior
Current smoker
5.9
11.1
15.9
32.9
Heavy drinker
5.6
9.0
9.3
23.9
Socioeconomic challenge
Less than high school education


4.6
4.6
Unemployment

5.7
9.2
14.9
No health insurance 3.8 3.8

* Adverse childhood experience categories that were not statistically different from the unexposed (zero adverse childhood experiences) group were not included in the PAF calculation and are indicated by a dash. All models were adjusted for sex, age group, and race/ethnicity.

Based on the number of adverse childhood experience types reported.

§ States with state-added adverse childhood experience questions: Alaska, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas (2015), Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Utah (2016); Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin (2017).

Overweight: body mass index ≥25 kg/m2; obesity: body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.

Discussion

Approximately three fifths of the adults among the 25-state study population experienced at least one type of adverse childhood experience, and approximately one in six reported experiencing four or more types of adverse childhood experiences. This study found that adverse childhood experiences are associated with leading causes of morbidity and mortality and with poor socioeconomic outcomes in adulthood. Persons reporting more types of adverse childhood experiences were at highest risk. These findings are consistent with those from similar analyses conducted in England, Europe, and North America (1,2) and suggest that preventing adverse childhood experiences might reduce occurrences of the outcomes examined, with potential reductions ranging from 1.7% (overweight or obesity) to 44.1% (depression). Given these findings, preventing adverse childhood experiences could have broad positive health, social, and economic impacts. For example, preventing adverse childhood experiences could potentially reduce the number of persons with coronary heart disease, the leading cause of death in the United States (13), by up to 12.6%, representing a potential reduction of approximately 1.1 million cases of coronary heart disease for the 25 states analyzed. Applied to national estimates in 2017, this translates to up to 1.9 million cases of coronary heart disease, 2.5 million cases of overweight or obesity, 1.5 million incidences of high school noncompletion, and 21 million cases of depression that would have been potentially avoided by preventing adverse childhood experiences (19).

Those who experienced four or more types of adverse childhood experiences accounted for a disproportionate share of the preventable fraction of every health and socioeconomic outcome measured. Although the prevalence of any type of adverse childhood experience was similar among men and women, the prevalence of four or more types of adverse childhood experiences was higher among women. The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences was also higher among persons aged 18–24 and 25–34 years, particularly the prevalence of four or more types of adverse childhood experiences, compared with other age groups. The higher risk among the younger groups could be due to differences across cohorts in risk, willingness to disclose, or ability to recall adverse childhood experiences. Increased mortality among those with higher adverse childhood experiences could also contribute to this pattern. Strategies to prevent adverse childhood experiences in the first place and to intervene with those who have been exposed to adverse childhood experiences might help to reduce prevalence of engaging in health risk behaviors in young adulthood and subsequent negative health outcomes. These strategies might also help to break the multigenerational cycle of adverse childhood experiences as these age groups are most likely to start families or raise children. Significant racial/ethnic inequities were also observed: AI/AN, blacks, and the Other racial/ethnic groups had substantially higher prevalences of four or more types of adverse childhood experiences, compared with whites. Communities could focus on reducing stressors these groups might face from living in underresourced neighborhoods and from historical and ongoing trauma caused by systemic racism or multigenerational poverty resulting from limited educational and economic opportunities (14).

Depression, heavy drinking, smoking, lower educational attainment, lack of health insurance, and unemployment were significantly associated with adverse childhood experiences. Previous research has also documented the connection between adverse childhood experiences and substance use and suicide (6), underscoring the importance of preventing adverse childhood experiences as a strategy for addressing the opioid overdose crisis, reducing the prevalence of suicide, and preventing leading causes of death in the United States. Prevention of adverse childhood experiences is possible with state and community efforts to build resilient families and communities, provide parental support to develop positive parenting and coping skills, and increase access to, and use of, comprehensive health services (14,15).

The findings of this report are subject to at least six limitations. First, recall and social desirability biases might reduce accuracy of self-reported adverse childhood experiences, thereby underestimating the actual prevalence of adverse childhood experiences. Second, causality cannot be inferred from these cross-sectional data. Third, data were from 25 states and might not be generalizable to other states. Fourth, the data do not assess severity, frequency, or duration of adverse childhood experiences, nor do they contrast the effects of specific types of adverse childhood experiences. Fifth, it was not possible to control for factors that could affect both adverse childhood experiences and selected outcomes (e.g., family socioeconomic position during childhood). Finally, the BRFSS adverse childhood experience module is a brief public health surveillance instrument. As such, it identifies a limited set of adverse childhood experiences and not the full range of childhood adversities. Despite these limitations, the findings from this study can help multiple sectors, including clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and the public, appreciate the connections between cumulative exposure to adversity and mental, physical, and socioeconomic outcomes.

Fundamental to adverse childhood experience prevention is the creation of safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments for all children and families. CDC’s comprehensive approach to preventing adverse childhood experiences uses multiple strategies derived from the best available evidence (14). These strategies emphasize early prevention and include 1) strengthening economic supports for families (e.g., earned income tax credits, family-friendly work policies); 2) promoting social norms that protect against violence and adversity (e.g., public education campaigns to support parents and positive parenting, bystander approaches to support healthy relationship behaviors); 3) ensuring a strong start for children (e.g., early childhood home visitation, high quality child care, preschool enrichment programs); 4) enhancing skills to help parents and youths handle stress, manage emotions, and tackle everyday challenges (e.g., social emotional learning programs, safe dating and healthy relationship skill programs, parenting skill and family relationship approaches); 5) connecting youths to caring adults and activities (e.g., mentoring and after school programs). The sixth strategy is intervening to lessen immediate and long-term harms through enhanced primary care to identify and address adverse childhood experience exposures with screening, referral, and support; victim-centered services; and advancement of trauma-informed care for children, youths, and adults with a history of adverse childhood experience exposures. This is important for reducing the consequences of adverse childhood experiences and for helping to protect the next generation of children from exposure to violence and other adverse experiences, such as witnessing substance misuse in their household. Multiple studies have documented that substantial reductions in adverse childhood experiences are possible and can have broad and sustained benefits (1416). For example, adverse childhood experience prevention strategies are associated with higher academic achievement and reductions in depression, suicidal behavior, arrest and incarceration rates, and substance use in adolescence and adulthood (14).

Adverse childhood experiences can contribute to a large public health burden across multiple outcomes. Effective, comprehensive approaches to preventing adverse childhood experiences are available. States and communities can use data and resources such as CDC’s Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Leveraging the Best Available Evidence (14) to better understand adverse childhood experiences in their locales, prioritize adverse childhood experience prevention, and improve the mental, physical, and social well-being of their populations over the lifespan (14).

Summary.

What is already known about this topic?

Adverse childhood experiences are common and are associated with many poor health and life outcomes in adulthood.

What is added by this report?

Nearly 16% of adults in the study population reported four or more types of adverse childhood experiences, which were significantly associated with poorer health outcomes, health risk behaviors, and socioeconomic challenges. Population attributable fractions representing potential percentage reductions in outcomes ranged from 1.7% for overweight or obesity to 44.1% for depression.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Using the best available evidence to create safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments can prevent adverse childhood experiences and could potentially prevent adult chronic conditions, depression, health risk behaviors, and negative socioeconomic outcomes.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Footnotes

In 2015, data were analyzed from Alaska, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas; in 2016, from Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Utah; and in 2017, from Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

§

The Other race/ethnicity category consisted of participants self-reporting as non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic multiracial, or non-Hispanic other.

References

  • 1.Bellis MA, Hughes K, Leckenby N, Perkins C, Lowey H. National household survey of adverse childhood experiences and their relationship with resilience to health-harming behaviors in England. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: BMC Medicine; 2014. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-12-72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Bellis MA, Hughes K, Ford K, Ramos Rodriguez G, Sethi D, Passmore J. Life course health consequences and associated annual costs of adverse childhood experiences across Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2019;4:e517–28. 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30145-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:245–58. 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Font SA, Maguire-Jack K. Pathways from childhood abuse and other adversities to adult health risks: the role of adult socioeconomic conditions. Child Abuse Negl 2016;51:390–9. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gilbert LK, Breiding MJ, Merrick MT, et al. Childhood adversity and adult chronic disease: an update from ten states and the District of Columbia, 2010. Am J Prev Med 2015;48:345–9. 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2017;2:e356–66. 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Metzler M, Merrick MT, Klevens J, Ports KA, Ford DC. Adverse childhood experiences and life opportunities: shifting the narrative. Child Youth Serv Rev 2017;72:141–9. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shonkoff JP. Capitalizing on advances in science to reduce the health consequences of early childhood adversity. JAMA Pediatr 2016;170:1003–7. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Merrick MT, Ford DC, Ports KA, Guinn AS. Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences from the 2011–2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 23 states. JAMA Pediatr 2018;172:1038–44. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sacks V, Murphey D. The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences, nationally, by state, and by race or ethnicity. Bethesda, Maryland: Child Trends; 2018. https://www.childtrends.org/publications/prevalence-adverse-childhood-experiences-nationally-state-race-ethnicity/
  • 11.Sheats KJ, Irving SM, Mercy JA, et al. Violence-related disparities experienced by black youth and young adults: opportunities for prevention. Am J Prev Med 2018;55:462–9. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brown DW, Anda RF, Tiemeier H, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of premature mortality. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:389–96. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Arias E. National Center for Health Statistics data brief no. 328: mortality in the United States, 2017. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db328-h.pdf
  • 14.CDC. Preventing adverse childhood experiences (ACES): leveraging the best available evidence. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/preventingACES-508.pdf
  • 15.Fortson BL, Klevens J, Merrick MT, Gilbert LK, Alexander SP. Preventing child abuse and neglect: a technical package for policy, norm, and programmatic activities. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2016.. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/can-prevention-technical-package.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marie-Mitchell A, Kostolansky R. A systematic review of trials to improve child outcomes associated with adverse childhood experiences. Am J Prev Med 2019;56:756–64. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ford DC, Merrick MT, Parks SE, et al. Examination of the factorial structure of adverse childhood experiences and recommendations for three subscale scores. Psychol Violence 2014;4:432–44. 10.1037/a0037723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rückinger S, von Kries R, Toschke AM. An illustration of and programs estimating attributable fractions in large scale surveys considering multiple risk factors. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:7. 10.1186/1471-2288-9-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2017.html [Google Scholar]

Articles from Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES