Skip to main content
Redox Report : Communications in Free Radical Research logoLink to Redox Report : Communications in Free Radical Research
. 2014 Dec 12;20(2):89–96. doi: 10.1179/1351000214Y.0000000119

Reactivity of catecholamine-driven Fenton reaction and its relationships with iron(III) speciation

Victoria Melin 1,, Adolfo Henríquez 2, Juanita Freer 3, David Contreras 2
PMCID: PMC6837720  PMID: 25496478

Abstract

Introduction: Fenton reaction is the main source of free radicals in biological systems. The reactivity of this reaction can be modified by several factors, among these iron ligands are important. Catecholamine (dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine) are able to form Fe(III) complexes whose extension in the coordination number depends upon the pH. Fe(III)-catecholamine complexes have been related with the development of several pathologies.

Methods: In this work, the ability of catecholamines to enhance the oxidative degradation of an organic substrate (veratryl alcohol, VA) through Fenton and Fenton-like reactions was studied. The initial VA degradation rate at different pH values and its relationship to the different iron species present in solution were determined. Furthermore, the oxidative degradation of VA after 24 hours of reaction and its main oxidation products were also determined.

Results: The catecholamine-driven Fenton and Fenton-like systems showed higher VA degradation compared to unmodified Fenton or Fenton-like systems, which also showed an increase in the oxidation state of the VA degradation product. All of this oxidative degradation takes place at pH values lower than 5.50, where the primarily responsible species would be the Fe(III) mono-complex.

Conclusion: The presence of Fe(III) mono-complex is essential in the ability of catecholamines to increase the oxidative capacity of Fenton systems.

Keywords: Fenton reaction, Catecholamines, Dopamine, Epinephrine, Norepinephrine, Catechol, Fenton-like reaction

Introduction

Fenton reactions are catalytic oxidation reactions starting with iron(II) precursors. A mixture of Fe(II) and H2O2 is known as Fenton's reagent that was described for the first time by H.J.H. Fenton in 1894.1 The mechanism of this reaction was proposed by Haber and Weiss in 1934.2 This mechanism includes the production of the hydroxyl radical (HO) as the main oxidizing species (Equation (1))

Fe2++H2O2Fe3++HO+HOk70lmol1s1(Ref.3) (1)

As a product of the Fenton reaction, alternatives oxidizing species have also been suggested to the HO radical, among which stand out the ferryl species4 [Fe=O]2+, and singlet oxygen.5 However, the conditions in which one sort or another specie that prevails is still unclear.

Fenton-like reactions are catalytic oxidation reactions starting with iron(III) precursors. Fe(III) with H2O2 is known as a Fenton-like reagent. The rate of this reaction is four orders magnitude lower than Fenton reactions and proceeds through the formation of hydroperoxyl radicals (HO2)6 (Equation (2)).

It should be noted that both Fenton and Fenton-like reactions proceed catalytically by using several sequential reactions.7 Among these, Equations (1) and (2) are involved in both types of reactions

Fe3++H2O2Fe2++HO2+H+k=0.01lmol1s1(Ref.7) (2)

The production of reactive species by a Fenton reaction can be enhanced by several iron ligands. Among these ligands are 2,4-dimethylaniline,8 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), desferal,9 humic acids,10 malonic acid, oxalic acid, ascorbic acid,11 and dihydroxybenzenes (DHBs).12 The DHB-driven Fenton reaction has been studied in different systems such as metabolic pathways13,14 and advanced oxidation processes for water or wastewater treatment.15,16 The main explanation for the increase in the production of reactive species is based on the ability of DHB to form complexes with Fe(III) and thereby reducing it to Fe(II) through inner-sphere mechanisms.17 This ability has been established only for 1,2- and 1,4-DHB and not for 1,3-DHB because a quinoid system has to be formed.18 In previous reports, the speciation of iron complexes has been associated with the reactivity of a 1,2-DHB-driven Fenton reaction against a recalcitrant substrate. Here, the highest oxidation of the substrate was predicted at a pH=3.4.19 At this pH, the concentrations of HO in the 1,2-DHB-driven Fenton reactions were higher than in unmodified Fenton reactions.20 The chemiluminescence of the 1,2-DHB-driven Fenton reactions was also higher and longer in time than for the unmodified Fenton reactions.21

The biological catecholamines (dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine) are a type of 1,2-DHB. These compounds have been related with the etiology and development of Parkinson's disease,2224 stress-induced arrhythmias, cardiopathies,25 cardiac injuries by myocardial infarction,26 and inflammatory damage caused by chronic stress.27

The coordination number of iron complexes with catecholamines is pH-dependent28 (Fig. 1). Mono-complexes are mainly formed at acidic pH values lower than 6.0 and have a maximum absorbance at approximately 700 nm. This complex is very unstable because Fe(III) quickly reduces to Fe(II) by the catecholamine through an inner-sphere mechanism.29 At nearly neutral pH values, bis-complexes are formed (maximum absorbance at approximately 560 nm). These are more stable than the mono-complexes. At basic pH values, stable tris-complexes are formed (maximum absorbance at approximately 490 nm).28

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Catecholamine-Fe(III) complexes at different pH values. R=H (catechol); CH2-CH2-NH2 (dopamine); CHOH-CH2-NHCH3 (epinephrine); and CHOH-CH2-NH2 (norepinephrine).

In vitro studies have reported that the Fe(III)-dopamine complex induces neuronal toxicity via oxidizing species such as HO.23 However, the capacities of catecholamines to induce and amplify Fenton or a Fenton-like reactions have not been directly studied.

In this paper, the effect of catecholamines on the reactivities of Fenton and Fenton-like reactions was established through analysis of 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol (veratryl alcohol (VA)) degradation in a pH ranging between 2.00 and 7.00. This substrate is hard to oxidize (1.36 V),30 which makes it an appropriate compound to study the oxidizing ability of the modified and unmodified Fenton and Fenton-like systems.

Experimental methods

General procedures

All of the reagent solutions were prepared in the dark under argon atmosphere.

Reagents

All reagents were used without additional purification. The reagents were catechol (Sigma); dopamine hydrochloride (Sigma); (±)-epinephrine hydrochloride (Sigma); DL-norepinephrine hydrochloride; H2O2 30% (w/w) (Merck); ferric nitrate (Merck); ferrous sulfate (Merck); 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol (VA, Sigma); formic acid (Fluka); and HPLC quality acetonitrile (Merck).

VA degradation

Oxidative VA degradation by Fenton and Fenton-like systems was performed between pH values of 2.00 and 7.00. The pH of each solution was adjusted just before each reaction using a 3 Start Thermo Orion pH meter. A 0.050 mol l−1 bis-tris buffer was used for pH values from 6.00 to 7.00; a 0.050 mol l−1 acetate buffer was used for pH values from 4.00 to 5.50; and HNO3 was used to regulate pH values lower than 4.00.

The final concentrations in the systems were 5.00 µmol l−1 FeSO4 or Fe(NO3)3 (for Fenton or Fenton-like systems, respectively), 50.0 µmol l−1 catechol or catecholamines, 500 µmol l−1 H2O2 and 300 µmol l−1 VA. The ionic strength of all the solutions was adjusted with KNO3 to 0.100 mol l−1. All of the experiments were performed at 20±0.1°C. The description of each system studied is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Systems studied

Systems Name
FeSO4+H2O2+VA Unmodified Fenton system
Fe(NO3)3+H2O2+VA Unmodified Fenton-like system
FeSO4+H2O2+VA+catechol Catechol-driven Fenton system
Fe(NO3)3+H2O2+VA+catechol Catechol-driven Fenton-like system
FeSO4+H2O2+VA+catecholamine* Catecholamine-driven Fenton system
Fe(NO3)3+H2O2+VA+catecholamine* Catecholamine-driven Fenton-like system

*Catecholamine: dopamine, epinephrine, or norepinephrine.

The VA concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Hitachi, Elite LaChrom). The mobile phase composition was water, acetonitrile, and formic acid in the ratio of 900:100:1 with a flow rate of 1.1 ml minute−1. The stationary phase was a Merck C-18 column filled with 5 µm sized particles (Lichrospher 100 RP-18) with a stainless steel holder 12.5 cm long (Lichrocart 125-4). The photometric detector was set at 277 nm.

The VA concentration was monitored during 30 minutes after starting the reaction. Then 24 hours later the final VA concentration was determined. The initial VA degradation rate (IR) was determined from the linear range in the first 30 minutes of the reaction. The maximum oxidative degradation of VA was determined after 24 hours of reaction time. These results are expressed as the percentage of VA degradation.

The uncertainty of each measurement was calculated from the calibration curve by the Eurachem method.31

Determination of VA degradation products

Five hundred milliliters of each system studied were reacted for 24 hours. Then, the samples were pre-concentrated by using solid phase extraction cartridges (60 mg of C18, OASIS, Waters). Afterward, the compounds in the column were eluted with 4.00 ml of dichloromethane. Finally, this extract was dried with N2 gas to a 1.00 ml volume. The samples were methylated with 300 µmol l−1 diazomethane and then injected into a Hewlett-Packard HP 5890 Series II GC equipped with an HP5972 MSD detector. The analytical column used was a HP 5 MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) with He as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 ml minute−1. The oven temperature programed was as follows: 70°C × 1 minute; 60°C minute−1, 200°C × 5 minutes; and 50°C minute−1, 250°C × 8 minutes. The temperatures of the injector and interface were 250 and 280°C, respectively.

The identification of the VA oxidation products was performed by comparing each spectrum with a mass spectra library database (NIST/EPA/NIH7SK).

Speciation of Fe(III)

The speciation of Fe(III) at different pH values was calculated using ‘CHEAQS proV.2004.1’ software designed by Wilko Verweij (http://home.tiscali.nl/cheaqs/). The equilibrium constants used in this software were obtained from the NIST database 46, 2004.

Estimated initial VA degradation

The experimental results obtained for the IR by Fenton-like systems at different pH values were fit with several functions (exponential, sigmoidal, and polynomial). The Gaussian function showed the best fit. The statistical validation was performed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with 95% reliability. From this Gaussian function a curve was plotted. This curve will now on be referred to as an estimated IR.

Relationship between iron speciation and the initial VA degradation rate

To obtain a quantitative parameter to establish the participation of various Fe(III) species in the oxidative degradation of VA, a linear polynomial was determined. This polynomial was obtained by using multiple linear regression (MLR) (Equation (3)) with algorithm of Equation (4). The obtained equation was validated by an ANOVA test with 95% reliability

Y=B×X (3)
B=(XtX)1XtY (4)

In MLR, the concentrations of different Fe(III) species at different pH values were used as independent variables (X matrix) and the estimated IR was used as the dependent variable (Y matrix). The estimated IR was used instead of the experimental IR values. This is because the number of experimental values obtained for the IR were insufficient to establish a relationship between this parameter of reactivity and the Fe(III) species present at different pH values.

From the MLR analysis, a vector of coefficients was obtained (matrix B). Each coefficient (Bi) was related to a specific independent variable (iron species). For each pH value, the contribution of each Fe(III) species (%) was determined. This value was calculated using Equation (5), where [FeL]i is the concentration of each Fe(III) species at each pH value, and Bi[FeL]i is the summation of all of the products of each [FeL]i and its respective Bi

Contribution(%)=Bi[FeL]iBi[FeL]i100 (5)

Results and discussion

VA degradation in unmodified Fenton and Fenton-like systems

In order to analyze the VA degradation by Fenton and Fenton-like systems, the initial VA degradation rate (IR) and the percentage of VA degradation after 24 hours were determined.

Unmodified Fenton systems degrade less than 5% of the VA after 24 hours of reaction at a pH of 2.00 and pH values between 4.50 and 7.00 (Fig. 2A). The maximum oxidative degradations of VA at pH values of 3.00, 3.40, and 4.00 were 24.6 ± 0.2%, 16.3 ± 0.3%, and 7.5 ± 0.3%, respectively. Among these, the highest IR was at a pH of 3.40 (0.59 ± 0.05 µmol l−1 minute−1; Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Percentage of oxidative degradation of VA after 24 hours of reaction in Fenton systems. (B) Initial VA degradation rate at different pH values in Fenton systems. Light gray bar: unmodified Fenton systems; red bar: catechol-driven Fenton systems; green bar: dopamine-driven Fenton systems; blue bar: epinephrine-driven Fenton systems; pink bar: norepinephrine-driven Fenton systems.

In unmodified Fenton-like systems, the oxidative degradation of VA was not observed over a pH of 5.50 (Fig. 3A). At pH 3.00, highest degradation for these systems was found to occur (28.8 ± 0.2% of VA degradation).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) Percentage of degradation of VA after 24 hours of reaction in Fenton-like systems. (B) Initial VA degradation rate at different pH values in Fenton-like systems. Gray bar: unmodified Fenton-like systems; red bar: catechol-driven Fenton-like systems; green bar: dopamine-driven Fenton-like systems; blue bar: epinephrine-driven Fenton-like systems; pink bar: norepinephrine-driven Fenton-like systems.

The IR for unmodified Fenton-like systems was determined at pH values from 2.00 to 4.50 (Fig. 3B). Since at pH value higher than 4.50 significant decreases in the VA concentration were not observed for the first 30 minutes of the reaction. For unmodified Fenton-like systems the highest IR was observed at a pH of 3.00 (0.71 ± 0.04 µmol l−1 minute−1).

In general, the IR value for the unmodified Fenton system was lower than the IR for the unmodified Fenton-like system. This could be explained by the main oxidizing species produced in the initial stages of the reaction in each system. In Fenton reactions, the main oxidizing species is HO which is highly reactive, and therefore it has a low diffusion capacity. The main oxidizing species in Fenton-like reactions is HO2 which is less reactive and therefore has a greater diffusion capacity than HO. Due to this difference in the oxidizing species, the VA oxidations performed by unmodified Fenton-like systems are more efficient than the oxidations performed by unmodified Fenton systems.

VA degradation in catecholamine-driven Fenton and Fenton-like reactions

Increases in the oxidative degradation of VA by Fenton and Fenton-like systems were observed when catecholamines drive these reactions (Figs. 2 and 3).

In unmodified Fenton and Fenton-like systems, the maximum oxidative degradation of VA does not exceed 30%, whereas in the presence of catecholamines, this degradation can reach up to 70%. In both catecholamine-driven Fenton and Fenton-like systems, the highest oxidative degradation of VA is reached at a pH of 3.40. This is consistent with the studies on catechol that was previously reported by Contreras et al.19

The oxidative degradation of VA by catecholamine-driven Fenton and Fenton-like systems was observed up to a pH of 5.50.

At the same pH value, no significant differences were observed in the maximum oxidative degradation of VA in Fenton and Fenton-like systems driven by the same 1,2-DHB (Figs. 2B and 3B, respectively). However, for the same systems at different pH values, significant differences in the IR and maximum oxidative degradation of VA were observed.

In general, catechol-driven Fenton and Fenton-like systems have higher IR values than catecholamine-driven Fenton and Fenton-like systems. Catecholamines have an electron withdrawing substituent.32 This substituent may have the following two parallel effects: one is to increase the formation constant of the Fe(III)-complex and the other to destabilize semiquinone intermediates formed by the reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II). The combination of these two effects could be related to the decrease in reactivity of the catecholamine-driven systems.

It is noteworthy that catecholamine-driven Fenton-like systems have higher IR values than catecholamine-driven Fenton systems. Similar results have been observed in the degradation of several substrates by 1,2-DHB-driven Fenton systems.3335 This behavior could be related to the increase of the production of activated species by 1,2-driven Fenton-like systems.20,21

Fe(III) speciation and its effect on the initial VA degradation rate

To compare the relative contributions of different Fe(III) species to the reactivity (IR) values, a first-order polynomial was modeled. For this, the concentrations of Fe(III) species at different pH values were considered as independent variable, and the estimated IR values were considered as the dependent variable. Then, using MLR, a coefficient (Bi) associated with each Fe(III) species was obtained. These coefficients indicate the contribution of each Fe(III) species to IR.

Just for catechol the formation constants for all complexes formed with Fe(III) are reported. Because of this, the MLR is performed only for the catechol-driven system. However, changes in the speciation of catechol and catecholamine should be small, considering their structural similarity and the similarity observed in the experimental degradation that results at pH function.

Table 2 shows the coefficients obtained for unmodified Fenton-like systems. Here, the coefficient for the peroxo-complex [Fe(OOH)]2+ can be highlighted. This value is three orders of magnitude higher than the other coefficients. Thus, the polynomial shows that [Fe(OOH)]2+ is the main species that contributes to the IR. Therefore, the results obtained from the polynomial are consistent with previous reports by De Laat and Gallard, in which the [Fe(OOH)]2+ participation in the rate-limiting step of Fenton reactions was established from kinetic data.3

Table 2.

Coefficients obtained by MLR for each Fe(III) species present in the unmodified Fenton-like system

Fe(III) species Coefficient (Bi) × 10−5
[Fe]3+ 19 ± 4
[Fe(OH)]2+ 6.7 ± 0.7
[Fe(OH)2]+ 20 ± 4
[Fe(OOH)]2+ (63 ± 3) × 103

± standard error of the mean.

It should be noted that in unmodified Fenton-like systems, all coefficients are greater than zero (Table 2). This implies that all Fe(III) species present in the systems contribute to the estimated IR.

The contribution of each Fe(III) species in unmodified Fenton-like systems and the estimated IR as a function of pH were plotted (Fig. 4). The estimated IR maximum coincides with the maximum contribution of [Fe(OOH)]2+. This was an expected result because it was the largest coefficient (Table 2). At pH values lower than 2.70 and higher than 3.50, the species that contributes the most to the estimated IR are [Fe]3+ and [Fe(OH)2]+, respectively. However, the IR decreases in both pH ranges. This suggests that although [Fe]3+ and [Fe(OH)2]+ contributes to the IR, their efficiency in the oxidative degradation of VA is, however, low.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Contribution percentages of Fe(III) species in VA degradation by a Fenton-like reaction. Black line: Fe(III) species, gray line: estimated initial VA degradation rate.

In catechol-driven Fenton-like systems results similar to those of unmodified Fenton-like systems were obtained (Table 3). The coefficient for [Fe(OOH)]2+ is three orders of magnitude higher than the other coefficients. The coefficients of all the Fe(III) species are greater than zero with one exception, indicating that all the species contribute to the estimated IR (Table 3). The tris-complex, [Fe(catechol)3]3−, was the exception. This species showed a coefficient lower than zero and at least six orders of magnitude higher than the other coefficients. This is coherent with the antioxidant activity for catechol tris-complexes. In this complex, all the Fe(III) positions in the coordination sphere are occupied by a non-labile ligand, limiting the exchange of H2O2 by other ligands and thereby inhibiting the Fenton reaction, which is performed by an inner-sphere mechanism.36,37

Table 3.

Coefficients obtained by MLR for each Fe(III) species present in the catechol-driven Fenton-like system

Fe(III) species Coefficient (Bi) × 10−5
[Fe]3+ 6.2 ± 0.1
[Fe(OH)]2+ 1.3 ± 0.7
[Fe(OH)2]+ 5.5 ± 0.1
[Fe(OOH)]2+ (23 ± 3) × 103
[Fe(catechol)]+ 8.9 ± 0.1
[Fe(catechol)2] 41 ± 1
[Fe(catechol)3]3− −(53 ± 3) × 106

± standard error of the mean.

For catechol-driven Fenton-like systems, the contribution of each Fe(III) species and the estimated IR as a function of pH is plotted in Fig. 5. In catechol-driven Fenton-like systems, the peroxo-complex remains the main species that contributes to the IR when it reaches its maximum. The [Fe]3+ provides the same contribution to the IR as in the unmodified Fenton-like system. However, [Fe(OH)2]+ shows a decrease in contribution to the IR from pH >3.00 in comparison to the contribution observed in Fenton-like systems. At a pH of 4.50 in unmodified Fenton-like systems, [Fe(OH)2]+ provides a contribution to the estimated IR of 86.6%, and in catechol-driven Fenton-like systems, this contribution decreases to 55.5%. The decrease in the contribution of [Fe(OH)2]+ occurs due to the presence of Fe(III)-catechol species present in the catechol-driven Fenton-like systems.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Contribution percentages of Fe(III) species in VA degradation by a catechol-driven Fenton-like reaction. Black line: Fe(III) species, gray line: estimated initial VA degradation rate.

The catechol presence in the studied system shifts the maximum IR to a pH of 3.40. Together with this shift, at least a threefold increase in the IR was observed over the pH range studied. Because [Fe]3+ and [Fe(OH)2]+ shows low efficiencies to promote the oxidative degradation of VA, it could be proposed that the Fe(III)-catechol species must be responsible for the increase in the IR.

The Fe(III)-catechol species that contributes to the estimated IR are the bis-complex ([Fe(catechol)2]) and the mono-complex ([Fe(catechol)]+). These species have coefficients of similar magnitude. However, Fig. 5 shows that [Fe(catechol)]+ is the Fe(III)-catechol species that contributes the most to estimated IR at pH values lower than 5.50. In the pH range close to the maximum IR, there is a linear correlation between the contribution of [Fe(catechol)]+ and the increase in the estimated IR (r = 0.996). This indicates that [Fe(catechol)]+ would be the species primarily responsible for the changes observed in the IR. [Fe(catechol)]+ would contribute to the oxidative degradation of VA through the reduction of Fe(III) into Fe(II).38 This increases the rate of limiting step of the Fenton reaction, which is the reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) by the disproportion of [Fe(OOH)]2+ to HO2 and Fe(II).39

VA oxidation products

The VA oxidation products were determined from systems that showed high oxidative degradation of VA (24 hours of reaction at a pH of 3.40).

Oxidized compounds of VA were identified from methylated samples (Table 4). Differences were observed in the relative amount of VA oxidation products generated by the different systems studied (Table 5). In unmodified Fenton and Fenton-like systems, approximately 95% of the VA oxidation compounds were veratryl aldehyde (Compound 1) and less than 5% were veratryl acid (Compound 2).

Table 4.

VA oxidation products determined by GC-MS

N Chemical structure Compound (#CAS) MW (g/mol) Qual (%) Main fragment ions, m/z (rel. Int.)
1 graphic file with name YRER_A_11689490_ILG0006.gif Benzaldehyde, 3,4-dimethoxy (120-12-9) 166 95 50(18),51(35),52(17),53(10),62(10),63(18),65(19), 67(12),77(38),79(33),(0(12),95(52),151(14), 165(65),166(100),167(10)
2 graphic file with name YRER_A_11689490_ILG0007.gif Benzoic acid, 3-4-dimethoxy-methyl ester (2150-38-1) 196 99 50(11),51(23),59(11),63(10),77(18),79(30),94(10),107(10), 121(12),122(11),125(12),137(10),165(100),166(14), 196(81),197(10)
3 graphic file with name YRER_A_11689490_ILG0008.gif Benzaldehyde, 3,4,5-trimethoxy* (86-81-7) 196 97 51(13),53(11),65(16),66(10),77(14),79(10),93(18),95(23), 110(29),125(30),166(11),181(43),196(100)
4 graphic file with name YRER_A_11689490_ILG0009.gif Benzaldehyde, 2,4,5-trimethoxy* (4460-86-0) 196 98 50(14),51(15),53(22),59(11),65(11),66(10),69(25),77(14), 79(15),93(12),95(23),107(10),109(14),110(21), 123(11),125(29),136(10),137(10),139(10),150(27), 151(16),153(19),165(12),166(11),179(10),181(62), 195(20),196(100),197(12)

Table 5.

Relative amounts of VA oxidation products from the different systems

  Relative amount (%)
System 1 2 3 4
Unmodified Fenton system 96.7 3.3 0 0
Unmodified Fenton-like system 98.7 1.3 0 0
Catechol-driven Fenton system 86.4 11.0 1.2 1.4
Catechol-driven Fenton-like system 87.4 10.4 1.2 1
Dopamine-driven Fenton system 89.9 10.1 0 0
Dopamine-driven Fenton-like system 89.8 9.2 0 0
Epinephrine-driven Fenton system 90.9 9.1 0 0
Epinephrine-driven Fenton-like system 90.7 9.3 0 0
Norepinephrine-driven Fenton system 89.6 10.3 0.1 0
Norepinephrine-driven Fenton-like system 90.6 9.3 0.1 0

The oxidation state in the identified products was higher in catechol and catecholamine-driven systems than in unmodified Fenton and Fenton-like systems. It was determined that over 9% of the oxidation compounds were veratryl acid (Compound 2) in all of the catechol and catecholamine-driven systems. The differences in relative amounts of the compounds determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) between the systems studied are not statistically significant. This is consistent with the results obtained in the percentage of VA degradation after 24 hours in which no significant difference was observed in the VA degradation by catechol or catecholamines-driven Fenton and Fenton-like systems.

Hydroxylation products were detected at the C2 and C3 positions of the ring from the catechol and norepinephrine-driven systems (Compounds 3 and 4). It was found that the hydroxylated species also had alcohols oxidized into aldehyde. This is consistent with the higher reactivity of the alcohol group.

Ligands, such as 1,2-DHB, can increase the production of reactive species in Fenton and Fenton-like systems, and they can also promote the formation of other oxidizing species such as singlet oxygen, semiquinone,5 and ferryl species.40 This can be an explanation for the increase in the oxidation state of VA degradation products obtained from catecholamine-driven Fenton and Fenton-like systems.

Conclusions

The oxidative degradation of VA by catechol and catecholamine-driven Fenton and Fenton-like reactions is pH-dependent. Catecholamines have the ability to significantly amplify Fenton and Fenton-like reactions at pH values ranging between 2.00 and 5.50. This implies that catecholamines would promote oxidative stress by Fenton or Fenton-like reactions at pH values lower than 5.50 because the mono-complex [Fe(catecholamine)]+ must be formed.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors None.

Funding The financial support for this work was granted by FONDECYT (Grand Nos. 1131101 and 1110606), CONICYT (Grand Nos. 1100880 and 24121439), and the FONDAP Solar Energy Research Center, SERC-Chile (Grant No. 15110019), ANILLO (ACT 130).

Conflict of interest None.

Ethics approval None.

References

  • 1.Fenton H. LXXIII – oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J Chem Soc Trans 1894;65:899–910. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haber F, Weiss J. The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by iron salts. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 1934;147:332–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gallard H, de Laat J, Legube B. Influence du pH sur la vitesse d'oxydation de composés organiques par FeII/H2O2. Mécanismes réactionnels et modélisation. New J Chem 1998;22(3):263–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bray W, Gorin M. Ferryl ion, a compound of tetravalent iron. J Am Chem Soc 1932;54(5):2124–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lin Z, Chen H, Zhou Y, Ogawa N, Lin J. Self-catalytic degradation of ortho-chlorophenol with Fenton's reagent studied by chemiluminescence. J Environ Sci 2012;24(3):550–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Walling C, Weil T. The ferric ion catalyzed decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in perchloric acid solution. Int J Chem Kinet 1974;6(4):507–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.De Laat J, Gallard H. Catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by Fe(III) in homogeneous aqueous solution: Mechanism and kinetic modeling. Environ Sci Technol 1999;33(16):2726–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bossmann S, Oliveros E, Kantor M, Niebler S, Bonfill A, Shahin N,. et al. New insights into the mechanisms of the thermal Fenton reactions occurring using different iron(II)-complexes. Water Sci Technol 2004;49(4):75–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Šnyrychová I, Pospíšil P, Nauš J. The effect of metal chelators on the production of hydroxyl radicals in thylakoids. Photosynth Res 2006;88(3):323–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Georgi A, Schierz A, Trommler U, Horwitz C, Collins T, Kopinke F. Humic acid modified Fenton reagent for enhancement of the working pH range. Appl Catal B 2007;72(1):26–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kang M, Lee S, Koh H. Prooxidant properties of ascorbic acid in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system of C57BL/6 mice. Toxicology 2012;294(1):1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kerem Z, Jensen K, Hammel K. Biodegradative mechanism of the brown rot basidiomycete Gloeophyllum trabeum: evidence for an extracellular hydroquinone-driven Fenton reaction. FEBS Lett 1999;446(1):49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jensen K, Houtman C, Ryan Z, Hammel K. Pathways for extracellular Fenton chemistry in the brown rot basidiomycete Gloeophyllum trabeum. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67(6):2705–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goodell B, Jellison J, Liu J, Daniel G, Paszczynski A, Fekete F,. et al. Low molecular weight chelators and phenolic compounds isolated from wood decay fungi and their role in the fungal biodegradation of wood. J Biotechnol 1997;53(2–3):133–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pignatello J, Oliveros E, MacKay A. Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2006;36(1):1–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goodell B, Jellison J, Liu J, Krishnamurthy S. Degradation and protection of organic compounds mediated by low molecular weight chelators. US Patent 6,046,375; 2000.
  • 17.Aguiar A, Ferraz A, Contreras D, Rodriguez J. Mechanism and applications of the Fenton reaction assisted by iron-reducing phenolic compounds. Quim Nova 2007;30(3):623–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pracht J, Boenigk J, Isenbeck-Schröter M, Keppler F, Schöler H. Abiotic Fe(III) induced mineralization of phenolic substances. Chemosphere 2001;44(4):613–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Contreras D, Freer J, Rodriguez J. Veratryl alcohol degradation by a catechol-driven Fenton reaction as lignin oxidation by brown-rot fungi model. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2006;57(1):63–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Contreras D, Rodríguez J, Freer J, Schwederski B, Kaim W. Enhanced hydroxyl radical production by dihydroxybenzene-driven Fenton reactions: implications for wood biodegradation. J Biol Inorg Chem 2007;12(7):1055–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Contreras D, Rodríguez J, Salgado P, Soto-Salazar C, Qian Y, Goodell B. Chemiluminescence of the Fenton reaction and a dihydroxybenzene-driven Fenton reaction. Inorg Chim Acta 2011;374:643–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berg D, Gerlach M, Youdim M, Double K, Zecca L, Riederer P,. et al. Brain iron pathways and their relevance to Parkinson's disease. J Neurochem 2001;79(2):225–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paris I, Martinez-Alvarado P, Cardenas S, Perez-Pastene C, Graumann R, Fuentes P,. et al. Dopamine-dependent iron toxicity in cells derived from rat hypothalamus. Chem Res Toxicol 2005;18(3):415–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Drechsel D, Patel M. Role of reactive oxygen species in the neurotoxicity of environmental agents implicated in Parkinson's disease. Free Radic Biol Med 2008;44(11):1873–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hašková P, Kovaříková P, Koubková L, Vávrová A, Macková E, Šimůnek T. Iron chelation with salicylaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone protects against catecholamine autoxidation and cardiotoxicity. Free Radic Biol Med 2011;50(4):537–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dhalla N, Adameova A, Kaur M. Role of catecholamine oxidation in sudden cardiac death. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2009;24(5):539–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Black P, Garbutt L. Stress, inflammation and cardiovascular disease. J Psychosom Res 2002;52(1):1–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Charkoudian L, Franz K. Fe(III)-coordination properties of neuromelanin component: 5,6-dihydroxyindole and 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid. Inorg Chem 2006;45(9):3657–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Linert W, Jameson G. Redox reactions of neurotransmitters possibly involved in the progression of Parkinson's disease. J Inorg Biochem 2000;79(1):319–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khindaria A, Yamazaki I, Aust S. Stabilization of the veratryl alcohol cation radical by lignin peroxidase. Biochemistry 1996;35(20):6418–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Eurachem, Eurolab, Citac, Nordtest, Amc Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling: a guide to methods and approaches Eurachem. In: Ramsey MH, Ellison SLR, (eds); 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hansch C, Leo A, Taft R. A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters. Chem Rev 1991;91(2):165–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hamilton G, Hanifin J, Friedman J. The hydroxylation of aromatic compounds by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of catalytic amounts of ferric ion and catechol. Product studies, mechanism, and relation to some enzymic reaction 1,2. J Am Chem Soc 1966;88(22):5269–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rodriguez J, Contreras D, Oviedo C, Freer J, Baeza J. Degradation of recalcitrant compounds by catechol-driven Fenton reaction. Water Sci Technol 2004;49(4):81–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Arantes V, Milagres A, Filley T, Goodell B. Lignocellulosic polysaccharides and lignin degradation by wood decay fungi: the relevance of nonenzymatic Fenton-based reactions. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2001;38(4):541–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gallard H, De Laat J, Legube B. Spectrophotometric study of the formation of iron(III)-hydroperoxy complexes in homogeneous aqueous solutions. Water Res 1999;33(13):2929–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Graf E, Mahoney J, Bryant R, Eaton J. Iron-catalyzed hydroxyl radical formation. Stringent requirement for free iron coordination site. J Biol Chem 1984;259(6):3620–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rodríguez J, Parra C, Contreras, Freer J, Baeza J. Dihydroxybenzenes: driven Fenton reactions. Water Sci Technol 2001;44(5):251–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Salgado P, Melin V, Contreras D, Moreno Y, Mansilla H. Fenton reaction driven by iron ligands. J Chil Chem Soc 2013;58(3):1842–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bossmann S, Oliveros E, Gob S, Siegwart S, Dahlen E, Payawan L,. et al. New evidence against hydroxyl radicals as reactive intermediates in the thermal and photochemically enhanced Fenton reactions. J Phys Chem A 1998;102(28):5542–50. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Redox Report : Communications in Free Radical Research are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES