Abstract
We present 271 detrital single-grain zircon fission track (ZFT) ages obtained for eight sandstones, which were sampled from the southwestern Yangtze Craton, southern China. Accessory minerals were concentrated using standard crushing, sieving, electro-magnetic and heavy liquid mineral separation techniques. Zircon grains were mounted on FEP Teflon and polished to expose their internal surfaces to 4π geometry. Two to three mounts of each sample were etched in KON:NaOH eutectic melt at ∼228 °C for 12–60 hours to reveal spontaneous fission tracks. Etched mounts were covered with a uranium-free muscovite external detector for the irradiation with thermal neutrons. CN2 standard uranium glasses were embedded with the age standards (Fish Canyon Tuff zircons). After irradiation, external mica detectors were removed from sample mounts and then etched in 48% HF at room temperature for 30 min to reveal induced tracks. Fission track counting was performed using a Zeiss Axiotron microscope at a total magnification of 1250 × . Zircon fission-track ages were calculated using the ζ-calibration technique. The central ages (with 1σ error) vary from 144.7 ± 4.9 Ma to 256.7 ± 9.6 Ma, with variable P(χ2) values of 0%–75%. ZFT ages of the five Cambrian to Ordovician samples are younger than their depositional ages, and thus were fully reset by post-depositional heating. ZFT ages of three Jurassic samples are partially reset, as they overlap with or slightly younger than the corresponding depositional ages.
Keywords: Detrital zircon, Fission-track dating, Emeishan large igneous province, Thermal imprints, Yangtze craton
Specifications Table
| Subject | Geology |
| Specific subject area | Thermochronology, which is a branch of geochronology to determine the age of rocks through radioactive isotopes. |
| Type of data | 1 Table 1 Excel file |
| How data were acquired | Zircon fission-track ages were obtained using external detector method |
| Data format | Raw Analyzed Filtered |
| Parameters for data collection | Zircon mounts were etched for 12–60 h at 228 °C in KOH: NaOH eutectic melt. External mica detectors were etched in 48% HF at room temperature for 30 min to reveal induced tracks. Fission track counting was performed using a Zeiss Axiotron microscope at a total magnification of 1250 × . |
| Description of data collection | Fission track counting was manually performed under laboratory conditions |
| Data source location | City: Sichuan Country: China Latitude and longitude for collected samples: 28°08ʹ00ʺ(N) to 28°23ʹ39ʺ (N); 103°06ʹ51ʺ(E) to 103°51ʹ03ʺ (E) |
| Data accessibility | With the article |
Value of the Data
|
1. Data
ZFT dating of eight sandstone samples are compiled in Appendixes A. The dataset contains raw 271 detrital single-grain data through external detector method, as shown in Appendixes B.
2. Experimental design, materials, and methods
Eight lithic and quartz sandstone samples were collected. Mineral separation followed the standard density and magnetic procedures after crushing and sieving. All the randomly zircons were mounted in FEP Teflon and polished to expose their internal surfaces to 4π geometry. The detailed method of ZFT analysis followed that of Ref. [1]. Analyses were performed at China University of Geosciences, Beijing.
Two or three mounts of every sample were etched for 12–60 h at 228 °C in a KOH: NaOH eutectic mixture to reveal fossil fission-tracks [2]. Zircon mounts were then covered with a uranium-free muscovite external detector for irradiation in a well-thermalized neutron flux in the 492 Swim Reactor at Beijing. CN2 standard uranium glasses were embedded with the age standards (Fish Canyon Tuff zircons). The external detectors were then etched in 48% HF at room temperature for 30 min to reveal induced tracks. Ages were calculated using the ζ-calibration method [3].
Track counting was performed under a Zeiss Axiotron microscope at a magnification of 1250x. For each sample, we analyzed more than 30 grains. The RadialPlotter software was used to decompose dispersed age data to obtain statistically significant age populations [4].
Acknowledgments
Funding for this research was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (no. 41772211 and U1701641), National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2017ZX05008-004), and Guangdong Province Introduced Innovative R&D Team (2016ZT06N331). We are very grateful to the Sinopec Exploration Southern Company for their kind help with basic geological data, to Dr. Guangzheng Jiang for discussion and Dr. Zhuting Wang for field work.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104700.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Bernet M., Garver J.I. Fission-track analysis of detrital zircon. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2005;58:1–61. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Garver J.I. Etching zircon age standards for fission-track analysis. Radiat. Meas. 2003;37:47–53. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hurford A.J., Green P.F. The zeta age calibration of fission-track dating. Chem. Geol. 1983;41:285–317. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vermeesch P. RadialPlotter: a Java application for fission track, luminescence and other radial plot. Radiat. Meas. 2009;44:409–410. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
