Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2019 Oct 22;141(44):17498–17502. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09575

Reversible and Selective Interconversion of Hydrogen and Carbon Dioxide into Formate by a Semiartificial Formate Hydrogenlyase Mimic

Katarzyna P Sokol †, William E Robinson †, Ana R Oliveira ‡, Sonia Zacarias ‡, Chong-Yong Lee †, Christopher Madden †, Arnau Bassegoda §, Judy Hirst §, Inês A C Pereira ‡, Erwin Reisner †,*
PMCID: PMC6838786  PMID: 31638793

Abstract

graphic file with name ja9b09575_0004.jpg

The biological formate hydrogenlyase (FHL) complex links a formate dehydrogenase (FDH) to a hydrogenase (H2ase) and produces H2 and CO2 from formate via mixed-acid fermentation in Escherichia coli. Here, we describe an electrochemical and a colloidal semiartificial FHL system that consists of an FDH and a H2ase immobilized on conductive indium tin oxide (ITO) as an electron relay. These in vitro systems benefit from the efficient wiring of a highly active enzyme pair and allow for the reversible conversion of formate to H2 and CO2 under ambient temperature and pressure. The hybrid systems provide a template for the design of synthetic catalysts and surpass the FHL complex in vivo by storing and releasing H2 on demand by interconverting CO2/H2 and formate with minimal bias in either direction.

Semiartificial catalytic systems combine synthetic and biological units to drive challenging reactions and provide new concepts for catalyst design.1 Such solar-driven systems have already demonstrated coupling of water oxidation to the reduction of CO2,2−4 and protons4,5 for the production of chemical fuels. However, storage and transport of energy vectors are also important components in energy production–utilization cycles and their development will benefit from more advanced approaches and model systems.

H2 is a promising fuel in a carbon-neutral economy and its conversion to formate allows for easier storage and transport. H2 and formate are therefore an attractive energy vector pair. Furthermore, H2 gas cleanly separates from dissolved formate, and their interconversion comes at little thermodynamic cost (eqs 1–3).6,7 Achieving kinetic efficiency in HCO2–/H2 interconversion remains a synthetic challenge. Artificial systems commonly compete between decomposition of formic acid to CO and H2O (dehydration), and CO2 and H2 (dehydrogenation), and rely on precious metals, high temperature/pressure, organic solvents, and light.8−10

graphic file with name ja9b09575_m001.jpg 1
graphic file with name ja9b09575_m002.jpg 2
graphic file with name ja9b09575_m003.jpg 3

FHL complexes are biological machines for HCO2–/H2 interconversion.11 They are either membrane-associated complexes composed of a multisubunit [NiFe]-H2ase coupled to an FDH,11−13 or smaller soluble complexes of an [FeFe]-H2ase and an FDH.14,15 The E. coli FHL-1 complex, composed of the membrane-bound [NiFe]-H2ase 3 (HYD-3/HycE) and FDH-H (FdhF; Figure 1a), represents a well-studied FHL, evolving H2 under fermentative conditions.11,12 The constituent enzymatic units of FHL-1 have been demonstrated to be reversible electrocatalysts,16−20 but the complex is catalytically biased toward H2 production from formate.14,15,19 Interconversion of HCO2–/H2 has also been reported in whole-cell studies,14,20 notably in sulfate-reducing bacteria in the absence of sulfate.21,22Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough can grow by converting formate to H2,23 with formate oxidation catalyzed by a periplasmic FDH, and H2 produced either via direct (periplasmic H2ase) or transmembrane electron transfer (cytoplasmic H2ase).24

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Biological E. coli FHL-1 complex. FdhF, [Mo]-FDH; B/F/G, Fe–S cluster-containing proteins; HycE, [NiFe]-H2ase; HycD/C, membrane proteins.17 (b) IO-ITO|FDH||IO-ITO|H2ase cell: IO-ITO|FDH wired to IO-ITO|H2ase electrode. (c) FDH–ITO–H2ase nanoparticle (NP) system with enzymes immobilized onto ITO NP in solution. Species size not drawn to scale.

Redox biocatalysts, including H2ases and FDHs, have been coupled to other enzymatic processes via electron relays. H2ases have been connected to nitrate and fumarate reductases,25 diaphorase moieties,26 nicotinamide reductase, and alcohol dehydrogenase27 via graphitic particles. Notably, coupling a H2ase to carbon monoxide dehydrogenase efficiently catalyzed the water–gas shift reaction.28 Enzymatic cascades have linked FDH with formaldehyde and alcohol dehydrogenases for methanol production.29,30 However, the reversible interconversion of substrate and product has not been previously accomplished with such coupled enzymes in vitro.

Here, a semiartificial FHL complex mimic is presented by rewiring FDH31,32 and H2ase33 from D. vulgaris Hildenborough into electrochemical and colloidal systems (Figure 1b,c). These systems rely on efficient electrical contact of the [W/Se]-FDH active site via four [Fe4S4] clusters and the [NiFeSe]-H2ase active-site via three [Fe4S4] clusters with nanostructured ITO.

Macro-mesoporous inverse opal (IO) ITO electrodes (20 μm film thickness; 0.25 cm2 geometrical surface area) were assembled as previously reported.34 IO-ITO|FDH and IO-ITO|H2ase electrodes were prepared by drop-casting an FDH solution (2 μL, 19 μM with 50 mM DL-dithiothreitol, incubated for 15 min) and a H2ase solution (2 μL, 5 μM), onto IO-ITO.31,34 Protein film voltammetry (PFV) was recorded using a three-electrode configuration (Figures 2a and S1) in CO2/NaHCO3 solution. Current densities (J) of −185 μA cm–2 (CO2 reduction to formate by FDH) and −450 μA cm–2 (H+ reduction to H2 by H2ase) were observed at an applied potential (Eapp) of −0.6 V vs standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). Addition of sodium formate (20 mM) to the IO-ITO|FDH system resulted in formate oxidation to CO2, and 300 μA cm–2 was reached at −0.2 V vs SHE. After purging the IO-ITO|H2ase system with H2 (0.4 bar), H2 oxidation to H+ was observed and 440 μA cm–2 was reached at −0.2 V vs SHE. The voltammograms cut through zero current around the formal potentials of the CO2/HCO2− (eq 1) and H+/H2 redox couples (eq 2), demonstrating reversible electrocatalysis for both enzymes.6,35

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Three-electrode PFV (ν = 5 mV s–1, 1st and 5th scan, increasing transparency) using IO-ITO|FDH or IO-ITO|H2ase working, Ag/AgCl (KClsat) reference and Pt mesh counter electrodes. (b) Two-electrode PFV (ν = 5 mV s–1, 1st and 5th scan) of IO-ITO|FDH wired to IO-ITO|H2ase. (c) Two-electrode CPE of IO-ITO|FDH wired to IO-ITO|H2ase. Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 bar CO2 or 0.4/0.6 bar H2/CO2, pHinitial = 6.5–6.7, T = 25 °C, stirring. Substrates: formate (20 mM) and/or 0.4/0.6 bar H2/CO2.

Multiple PFV scans of IO-ITO|FDH and IO-ITO|H2ase (Figure S2) showed minimal desorption/activity losses. Controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) of IO-ITO|FDH and IO-ITO|H2ase was performed to measure H+/CO2 reduction (Eapp = −0.6 V) as well as H2/formate oxidation (Eapp = −0.2 V) (Figure S3). Following equilibration, both electrodes retained good activity after 24 h in both directions. Faradaic efficiencies (ηF) for formate and H2 production were determined to be 76% and 77%, respectively. Efficiency losses may be attributed to the capacitive background current of porous IO-ITO,34 undetected trapped product, and a contribution from ITO/FTO degradation.36,37

The comparable formal redox potentials of H+/H2 and CO2/HCO2– conversion (eq 1-3), reversible catalysis of the individual enzymes, high and matching current densities, and good stability make this enzyme pair a promising candidate for assembling a reversible HCO2–/H2 interconversion system.6 Thus, the IO-ITO|FDH (working electrode) was wired to the IO-ITO|H2ase (counter electrode) in a two-electrode configuration (Figure 2b). When no additional substrate was present (only buffering CO2 and H+), only a noncatalytic current attributed to IO-ITO capacitance was observed. Upon addition of formate, an oxidative current was observed (formate oxidation to CO2 and H+ reduction to H2) at a positive applied voltage (U > 0 V); 250 μA cm–2 was reached at U = 0.2 V. Addition of H2 resulted in a reductive current (H2 oxidation to H+ and CO2 reduction to formate) at a negative voltage with −250 μA cm–2 obtained at U = −0.2 V.

To achieve reversible formate/H2 interconversion (eq 3) both formate and H2 were added in addition to CO2 and H+. A reversible voltammogram was observed, with zero current at approximately U°′ at 0.02 V. A marginally more positive or negative voltage drove the reaction in either direction, demonstrating reversible unbiased electrocatalysis. 200 μA cm–2 and −200 μA cm–2 were reached at U = 0.2 V and −0.2 V, respectively. Multiple PFV scans of the IO-ITO|FDH||IO-ITO|H2ase cell (Figure S4) showed stability of the system with marginal losses. Control experiments with IO-ITO|FDH (or ITO|H2ase) wired to IO-ITO (Figure S5) gave only a small capacitive current in the presence and absence of substrates (H2/formate).

CPE over 2 h at Uapp = 0.2 V with the IO-ITO|FDH||IO-ITO|H2ase cell with formate present (Figure 2c) produced H2 (5.84 ± 0.88 μmol cm–2) with ηF of (79 ± 11)%. Similarly, CPE at Uapp = −0.2 V for 2 h with H2 present generated formate (5.00 ± 0.80 μmol cm–2) with ηF of (81 ± 15)%. This semiartificial electrochemical FHL system exhibited good stability, retaining >95% of its initial activity after 2 h in both directions. After equilibration, the cell exhibited high bidirectional stability for >1 day (Figure S6). For formate oxidation (Uapp = 0.2 V), H2 (36.28 μmol cm–2) was detected with ηF = 72%. For H2 oxidation (Uapp = −0.2 V), formate (42.80 μmol cm–2) was detected with ηF = 77%. Similarly to the three-electrode systems, capacitive currents and FTO/ITO dissolution36,37 might have decreased the product yield.

To further investigate the system’s reversibility without electrochemical wiring, FDH and H2ase were coassembled on ITO nanoparticles (NPs) (0.3 mg mL–1) (Figures 3 and S7) dispersed in electrolyte solution (see Supporting Information). Solutions of FDH (19 nM, incubated as above) and H2ase (3.4 nM) were added to the vessel, which was sealed and purged with CO2. Either formate or H2 was introduced to the vessel. FDH:H2ase molar ratios (Figure S8) and total concentrations (Figure S9a,b) were screened for the optimum H2 evolution rate. The optimal system contained an enzyme loading of approximately 40 FDH and 7 H2ase particles per ITO NP, based on the adsorption surface area of 27 m2 g–1, ∼31 400 nm2 per NP (assuming a 50 nm diameter sphere), and an enzyme footprint of ∼100 nm2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Product quantification of the colloidal FDH–ITO–H2ase NP system: using ITO NPs (0.3 mg mL–1), FDH (19.0 nM) and H2ase (3.4 nM). (a) H2 production in the presence of 10 mM formate and 1 bar CO2. Vheadspace = 1.72 mL. (b) Formate production in the presence of 0.4/0.6 bar H2/CO2. Vsolution = 2 mL. Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 bar CO2 or 0.4/0.6 bar H2/CO2, pHinitial = 6.5–6.7, T = 23 °C, stirring.

Upon formate addition to the FDH–ITO–H2ase system (Figure 3a), H2 was produced with a reaction rate (Figure S9c) of 0.24 ± 0.01 μmol H2 h–1 during the first 8 h [turnover number, TON = (23.0 ± 1.5) × 103 and turnover frequency, TOF = 6.4 ± 0.4 s–1 for the H2ase], after which the rate started to decrease (Table S1). Equilibrium was reached after ∼72 h (5.82 ± 0.24 μmol H2, pH 6.88, T = 23 °C), in agreement with calculations (5.95 μmol, 2.97 mM of H2; see Supporting Information).7

In the presence of H2, the FDH–ITO–H2ase system (Figure 3b) produced formate with an initial reaction rate of 1.33 ± 0.01 μmol formate h–1 [TON = (15.8 ± 5.4) × 103 and TOF = 4.4 ± 1.5 s–1 for the FDH] for the first 8 h (Figure S9d). Equilibrium was reached after ∼96 h (36.16 ± 1.47 μmol formate, pH 6.99, T = 23 °C), consistent with calculations (37.11 μmol, 18.56 mM of formate).7 Control experiments with no ITO NPs, omitting an enzyme or with denatured enzymes (Figure S10), showed only negligible H2 and formate production (<0.2 μmol) (Tables S2 and S3). Therefore, the ITO NPs act as a semiheterogeneous electron relay facilitating electron transfer between electroactive FDH and H2ase.

In D. vulgaris cells, the two periplasmic enzymes exchange electrons through the type-I cytochrome c3 (TpIc3) electron acceptor.24 We therefore studied the activity of these enzymes in solution with TpIc3. A high concentration of the cytochrome (1.9 μM, 100-fold excess vs FDH) was required to achieve comparable kinetics of H2 and formate production (Figure S11a,b), revealing the superiority of coimmobilizing the two enzymes on synthetic ITO NPs to achieve efficient electron transfer.

In summary, we have presented how semiartificial systems consisting of FDH and H2ase from D. vulgaris wired to ITO can mimic the biological FHL complex. The semiartificial FHL systems are based on a bottom-up design that employs a pair of reversible redox enzymes immobilized on conductive scaffolds to enable an overall catalytic reaction to proceed to thermodynamic equilibrium. The semiartificial FHL concept can be deployed in either an electrochemical cell or a self-assembled colloidal suspension, providing versatility for applications in different contexts. The design concept of linking two half-reactions via a conductive scaffold also provides a blueprint to develop improved synthetic H2/formate cycling catalysts in future development.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by ERC Consolidator Grant “MatEnSAP” (682833), BBSRC (BB/J000124/1, BB/I026367/1), EPSRC (EP/L015978/1, EP/G037221/1, nanoDTC and a DTA studentship to K.P.S.), a Marie Curie IntraEuropean Fellowship (PIEF-GA-2013-625034), a Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portugal) fellowship SFRH/BD/116515/2016, Grants PTDC/BIA-MIC/2723/2014, PTDC/BBB-BEP/2885/2014, R&D units UID/Multi/04551/2013 (Green-IT) and LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007660 (MostMicro), cofunded by FCT/MCTES and FEDER funds through COMPETE2020/POCI, and European Union’s Horizon 2020 (No. 810856).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09575.

  • Materials, experimental methods, figures and tables (PDF)

Author Contributions

∥ K.P.S. and W.E.R. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Notes

Additional data related to this publication are available at the University of Cambridge data repository (https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.45156).

Supplementary Material

ja9b09575_si_001.pdf (664.5KB, pdf)

References

  1. Kornienko N.; Zhang J. Z.; Sakimoto K. K.; Yang P.; Reisner E. Interfacing Nature’s Catalytic Machinery with Synthetic Materials for Semi-Artificial Photosynthesis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 890–899. 10.1038/s41565-018-0251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Woolerton T. W.; Sheard S.; Reisner E.; Pierce E.; Ragsdale S. W.; Armstrong F. A. Efficient and Clean Photoreduction of CO2 to CO by Enzyme-Modified TiO2 Nanoparticles Using Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2132–2133. 10.1021/ja910091z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu C.; Gallagher J. J.; Sakimoto K. K.; Nichols E. M.; Chang C. J.; Chang M. C. Y.; Yang P. Nanowire-Bacteria Hybrids for Unassisted Solar Carbon Dioxide Fixation to Value-Added Chemicals. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3634–3639. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sokol K. P.; Robinson W. E.; Warnan J.; Kornienko N.; Nowaczyk M. M.; Ruff A.; Zhang J. Z.; Reisner E. Bias-Free Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting with Photosystem II on a Dye-Sensitized Photoanode Wired to Hydrogenase. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 944–951. 10.1038/s41560-018-0232-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown K. A.; Wilker M. B.; Boehm M.; Dukovic G.; King P. W. Characterization of Photochemical Processes for H2 Production by CdS Nanorod-[FeFe] Hydrogenase Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 5627–5636. 10.1021/ja2116348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong F. A.; Hirst J. Reversibility and Efficiency in Electrocatalytic Energy Conversion and Lessons from Enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 14049–14054. 10.1073/pnas.1103697108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reda T.; Plugge C. M.; Abram N. J.; Hirst J. Reversible Interconversion of Carbon Dioxide and Formate by an Electroactive Enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 10654–10658. 10.1073/pnas.0801290105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loges B.; Boddien A.; Junge H.; Beller M. Controlled Generation of Hydrogen from Formic Acid Amine Adducts at Room Temperature and Application in H2/O2 Fuel Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3962–3965. 10.1002/anie.200705972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuehnel M. F.; Wakerley D. W.; Orchard K. L.; Reisner E. Photocatalytic Formic Acid Conversion on CdS Nanocrystals with Controllable Selectivity for H2 or CO. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9627–9631. 10.1002/anie.201502773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sordakis K.; Tang C.; Vogt L. K.; Junge H.; Dyson P. J.; Beller M. Homogeneous Catalysis for Sustainable Hydrogen Storage in Formic Acid and Alcohols. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 372–433. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Finney A. J.; Sargent F.. Advances in Microbial Physiology; Academic Press: London, 2019; Vol. 74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pinske C.Advances in Microbial Physiology; Academic Press: London, 2019; Vol. 74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lim J. K.; Mayer F.; Kang S. G.; Müller V. Energy Conservation by Oxidation of Formate to Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen via a Sodium Ion Current in a Hyperthermophilic Archaeon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 11497–11502. 10.1073/pnas.1407056111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schuchmann K.; Müller V. Direct and Reversible Hydrogenation of CO2 to Formate by a Bacterial Carbon Dioxide Reductase. Science 2013, 342, 1382–1386. 10.1126/science.1244758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwarz F. M.; Schuchmann K.; Müller V. Hydrogenation of CO2 at Ambient Pressure Catalyzed by a Highly Active Thermostable Biocatalyst. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 237. 10.1186/s13068-018-1236-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bassegoda A.; Madden C.; Wakerley D. W.; Reisner E.; Hirst J. Reversible Interconversion of CO2 and Formate by a Molybdenum-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15473–15476. 10.1021/ja508647u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McDowall J. S.; Murphy B. J.; Haumann M.; Palmer T.; Armstrong F. A.; Sargent F. Bacterial Formate Hydrogenlyase Complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, E3948–E3956. 10.1073/pnas.1407927111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mcdowall J. S.; Hjersing M. C.; Palmer T.; Sargent F. Dissection and Engineering of the Escherichia Coli Formate Hydrogenlyase Complex. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 3141–3147. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pinske C.; Sargent F. Exploring the Directionality of Escherichia Coli Formate Hydrogenlyase: A Membrane-Bound Enzyme Capable of Fixing Carbon Dioxide to Organic Acid. MicrobiologyOpen 2016, 5, 721–737. 10.1002/mbo3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roger M.; Brown F.; Gabrielli W.; Sargent F. Efficient Hydrogen-Dependent Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Escherichia Coli. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 140–145. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. da Silva S. M.; Voordouw J.; Leitão C.; Martins M.; Voordouw G.; Pereira I. A. C. Function of Formate Dehydrogenases in Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough Energy Metabolism. Microbiology 2013, 159, 1760–1769. 10.1099/mic.0.067868-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mourato C.; Martins M.; da Silva S. M.; Pereira I. A. C. A Continuous System for Biocatalytic Hydrogenation of CO2 to Formate. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 235, 149–156. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martins M.; Mourato C.; Pereira I. A. C. Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Growth Coupled to Formate-Driven H2 Production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 14655–14662. 10.1021/acs.est.5b02251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martins M.; Mourato C.; Morais-Silva F. O.; Rodrigues-Pousada C.; Voordouw G.; Wall J. D.; Pereira I. A. C. Electron Transfer Pathways of Formate-Driven H2 Production in Desulfovibrio. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 8135–8146. 10.1007/s00253-016-7649-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vincent K. A.; Li X.; Blanford C. F.; Belsey N. A.; Weiner J. H.; Armstrong F. A. Enzymatic Catalysis on Conducting Graphite Particles. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 761–762. 10.1038/nchembio.2007.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reeve H. A.; Lauterbach L.; Ash P. A.; Lenz O.; Vincent K. A. A Modular System for Regeneration of NAD Cofactors Using Graphite Particles Modified with Hydrogenase and Diaphorase Moieties. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1589–1591. 10.1039/C1CC14826E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Reeve H. A.; Lauterbach L.; Lenz O.; Vincent K. A. Enzyme-Modified Particles for Selective Biocatalytic Hydrogenation by Hydrogen-Driven NADH Recycling. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 3480–3487. 10.1002/cctc.201500766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lazarus O.; Woolerton T. W.; Parkin A.; Lukey M. J.; Reisner E.; Seravalli J.; Pierce E.; Ragsdale S. W.; Sargent F.; Armstrong F. A. Water-Gas Shift Reaction Catalyzed by Redox Enzymes on Conducting Graphite Platelets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14154–14155. 10.1021/ja905797w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nam D. H.; Kuk S. K.; Choe H.; Lee S.; Ko J. W.; Son E. J.; Choi E. G.; Kim Y. H.; Park C. B. Enzymatic Photosynthesis of Formate from Carbon Dioxide Coupled with Highly Efficient Photoelectrochemical Regeneration of Nicotinamide Cofactors. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 5989–5993. 10.1039/C6GC02110G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuk S. K.; Singh R. K.; Nam D. H.; Singh R.; Lee J. K.; Park C. B. Photoelectrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol through a Highly Efficient Enzyme Cascade. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3827–3832. 10.1002/anie.201611379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sokol K. P.; Robinson W. E.; Oliveira A. R.; Warnan J.; Nowaczyk M. M.; Ruff A.; Pereira A. C.; Reisner E. Photoreduction of CO2 with a Formate Dehydrogenase Driven by Photosystem II Using a Semi-Artificial Z-Scheme Architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 16418–16422. 10.1021/jacs.8b10247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miller M.; Robinson W. E.; Oliveira A. R.; Heidary N.; Kornienko N.; Warnan J.; Pereira I. A. C.; Reisner E. Interfacing Formate Dehydrogenase with Metal Oxides for the Reversible Electrocatalysis and Solar-Driven Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4601–4605. 10.1002/anie.201814419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marques M. C.; Tapia C.; Gutiérrez-Sanz O.; Ramos A. R.; Keller K. L.; Wall J. D.; De Lacey A. L.; Matias P. M.; Pereira I. A. C. The Direct Role of Selenocysteine in [NiFeSe] Hydrogenase Maturation and Catalysis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13, 544–550. 10.1038/nchembio.2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mersch D.; Lee C.-Y.; Zhang J. Z.; Brinkert K.; Fontecilla-Camps J. C.; Rutherford A. W.; Reisner E. Wiring of Photosystem II to Hydrogenase for Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8541–8549. 10.1021/jacs.5b03737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Léger C.; Bertrand P. Direct Electrochemistry of Redox Enzymes as a Tool for Mechanistic Studies Direct Electrochemistry of Redox Enzymes as a Tool for Mechanistic Studies. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2379–2438. 10.1021/cr0680742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Benck J. D.; Pinaud B. A.; Gorlin Y.; Jaramillo T. F. Substrate Selection for Fundamental Studies of Electrocatalysts and Photoelectrodes: Inert Potential Windows in Acidic, Neutral, and Basic Electrolyte. PLoS One 2014, 9, e107942. 10.1371/journal.pone.0107942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Geiger S.; Kasian O.; Mingers A. M.; Mayrhofer K. J. J.; Cherevko S. Stability Limits of Tin-Based Electrocatalyst Supports. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3–9. 10.1038/s41598-017-04079-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja9b09575_si_001.pdf (664.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES