Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2019 Nov 1;5(10):e02654. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02654

Understanding climate variability and change: analysis of temperature and rainfall across agroecological zones in Ghana

Peter Asare-Nuamah a,, Ebo Botchway b
PMCID: PMC6838908  PMID: 31720454

Abstract

In an agrarian economy like Ghana, the need to understand climate change is as paramount as finding solutions to address the challenges of climate change. While a large body of literature has focused on exploring the impact of climate change, very few studies in Ghana have attempted to expand our knowledge on the extent of climate change across ecological zones in Ghana. This study used Ghana Meteorological Agency's climate data from 1989 to 2015, to assess the characteristics and trends of rainfall and temperature across the six ecological zones in Ghana. With the aid of descriptive statistics, Mann-Kendall test, linear regression, analysis of variance and post-hoc comparison using Tukey HSD test, the study found increasing trend of temperature and decreasing rainfall across ecological zones and provided policy recommendations essential to offset the adverse impact of climate change particularly on agriculture.

Keywords: Environmental science, Climate change, Climate policy, Environmental analysis, Environmental assessment, Sustainable development, Temperature, Rainfall, Ecological zones, Ghana


Environmental science; Climate change; Climate policy; Environmental analysis; Environmental assessment; Sustainable development; Climate change; Temperature; Rainfall; Ecological zones; Ghana

1. Introduction

In contemporary global development discourse, climate change is considered a great threat to sustainable development. Indeed, climate change is a matter of life and death due to its grave impact on socioeconomic development, particularly in the Global South (FAO et al., 2017; IPCC, 2018). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) defines climate change as “a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activities that alter the composition of the global atmosphere and that is in addition to the natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods” (UNFCC, 2011). Substantial body of literature has demonstrated that climate change is mainly attributed to anthropogenic activities (Anderegg et al., 2010; Doran and Zimmerman, 2009; IPCC, 2013). Manifestation of climate change in the body of literature includes rise in temperature and sea levels, increase in the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and erratic, unpredictable and unreliable rainfall patterns and seasons. In addition, melting of ice and glaciers, floods, droughts and ENSO have dominated literature on climate change (IPCC, 2018, 2013).

In Ghana, about 1 °C increase in temperature occurred between 1960 and 2000 (MESTI, 2013). Future projections indicate that about 1.7 °C–2.04 °C increase in temperature will be observed in Ghana (MESTI, 2013). In addition, about 2.1mm per annum rise in sea level occurred between 1960 and 2000 and it estimated that by 2020, 2050 and 2080 about 5.8 cm, 16.5 cm and 34.5 cm rise in sea level will occur respectively (MESTI, 2013). Moreover, GHGs emission in Ghana increased from 12.2 MtCO2e to 24 MtCO2e between 2000 and 2006 (MESTI, 2013). Asante and Amuakwa-Mensah (2015) report that about 107% increase in GHGs emissions occurred in Ghana between 1990 and 2006. In effect, the changing climate has resulted in erratic, unpredictable and unreliable spatial and temporal distribution in rainfall in Ghana (Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Nyatuame et al., 2014). These changes threaten economic and social development and spell doom for an agrarian economy like Ghana.

Agriculture still plays a dominant role in the livelihoods of households in Ghana, serving as a stimulus for economic growth, providing food security and assisting in poverty reduction (MOFA, 2016). Even though there has been a decline in agricultural sector's performance and its contribution to most socioeconomic indicators, the sector still plays a central role in the Ghanaian economy. For instance, currently the sector contributes about a quarter to the country's GDP but still absorbs the highest proportion of the Ghanaian total employed population, with about 44.7% of the labour force employed in agricultural sector (MOFA, 2016). Notwithstanding, Ghana's agriculture is dominated by smallholder farmers who contribute about 80% of food produced (MOFA, 2016). These farmers have limited capacity to adapt effectively to climate change. In addition, agriculture is less mechanized and subsistence in practice, and dominated by the application of physical energy and rudiment tools such as cutlass and hoes. Moreover, only about 3% of arable land in Ghana is under irrigation (MOFA, 2016), which demonstrates the high dependency of Ghana's agriculture on climate particularly rainfall.

The amount of precipitation received determines the availability of water (IPCC, 2013; Nyatuame et al., 2014), for multiple purposes including transportation, hydropower generation, industry and agriculture. Indeed, water is one of the essential natural resources that support both human and animal life. It also serves domestic purposes such as cooking, washing and consumption. One of the most important source of water particularly in developing economies is rain. In Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africa in general, access to water is a great challenge (Sissoko et al., 2011), that hinders social and economic development. This stems from the fact that climate change affects water resources directly through reduction in amount of precipitation and indirectly through high temperature and the corresponding increase in evaporation (IPCC, 2013, 2007). According to Arnell (2004), about 75–250 million Africans are likely to experience water scarcity, due to rising temperature and erratic rainfall.

Nevertheless, few studies have explored rainfall and temperature trends in Ghana (Boansi et al., 2016; Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Nii Baah, 2018; Nkrumah et al., 2014; Nyatuame et al., 2014). Most of these studies focused on specific areas or regions such as Volta Region (Nyatuame et al., 2014), Central Region (Nii Baah, 2018), Upper East Region (Issahaku et al., 2016) and Kumasi (Campion and Venzke, 2013). Kabo-Bah et al. (2016) took a step further to examine rainfall and temperature across 22 meteorological stations in Ghana but focused on climate change and hydropower generation nexus. While the present study recognizes the growing body of literature, there is a dearth of literature on rainfall and temperature across agro-ecological zones in Ghana. Hence, this study fills the identified gap and contributes to the growing body of literature by assessing changes in rainfall and temperature from 1989 to 2015, across different ecological zones. The remaining sections of the paper present the methods, findings and discussion, conclusion and implications.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study setting

The study explored climate change in the six agro-ecological zones in Ghana, which is located in West Africa on Latitude 4° 44′N and 11° 11′N and Longitude 3° 11′ W and 1° 11′E and shares border with Ivory Coast to the West, Burkina Faso to the North, Togo to the East and the Atlantic Ocean to the South (MOFA, 2016). The total land surface area of Ghana is 243,438km2 (MOFA, 2016) and the 2010 population census revealed a total population of 24.5 million but was projected to increase to about 28.31 million by 2016 (Ghana Statisticial Service, 2017). Administratively, Ghana is currently divided into 16 regions with Accra as the national capital. It must be stated that Ghana had 10 regions at the time of data collection. Ghana, a lower middle income country has an agrarian economy (MOFA, 2016). As an agrarian economy, major food crops produced includes cassava, maize, plantain, rice, yam, and cocoyam while cash crops such as cocoa, shea butter and oil palm are also produced. The agriculture system in Ghana is subsistence, with about 90% of farms less than 2 ha (MOFA, 2016). In addition, agriculture is less mechanized, and although parts of Northern Ghana practice bullock farming, only about 3% of arable land is under irrigation in Ghana (MOFA, 2016). The dominance of subsistence and rain fed agriculture demonstrate Ghana's vulnerability to climate change.

Ghana has a sub-tropical warm and humid climate. The mean annual rainfall in Ghana is 1187 mm while mean temperature is 26.1 °C (MOFA, 2016). There are six major ecological zones, defined and characterized by soil, vegetation and climate. The ecological zones include: Rain Forest, Deciduous Forest, Coastal Savanna, Transitional Zone, and Northern Savanna which is further divided into Guinea and Sudan Savanna as shown in Fig. 1. The different ecological zones exhibit different climate characteristics. For instance, Coastal Ghana has 26.1 °C mean annual temperature while the far North has 28.9 °C (MOFA, 2016). Similarly, Guinea Savanna and Sudan Savanna receive a mean annual rainfall of 1100mm and 1000mm respectively while the rain forest receives a mean annual rainfall of about 2200mm (MOFA, 2016). a. For bimodal rainfall zones, the major rainfall season starts from March to July, while the minor season is from September to October. In the case of mono-modal rainfall zones, the season starts from July to September (MOFA, 2016). These therefore reinforce the major and minor farming seasons in Ghana. Table 1 provides detailed information on the characteristics of ecological zones in Ghana.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Ecological zones in Ghana. Source: Kemausuor et al., 2013.

Table 1.

Characteristics of ecological zones in Ghana.

Zone Rainfall (mm/year) Proportion of total area (%) Length of growing season (days) Major land use systems Major food crops
Rain forest 2200 3 MJ: 150-160
MN: 100
Forest, plantations Roots, plantain
Deciduous forest 1500 3 MJ: 150-160
MN: 90
Forest, plantations Roots, plantain
Transition zone 1300 28 MJ: 200-220
MN: 60
Annual food, cash crops Maize, roots, plantain
Coastal Savannah 800 2 MJ: 100-110
MN: 50
Annual food crops Roots, maize
Guinea Savannah 1100 63 180–200 Annual food, cash crops, livestock Sorghum, maize
Sudan Savannah 1000 1 150–160 Annual food crops, livestock Millet, sorghum, cowpea

MJ = Major season, MN = Minor season. Source: MOFA, 2016.

2.2. Data collection

The study sourced secondary climate data from Ghana Meteorological Agency in Accra, in 2016. The collected data comprised daily rainfall and temperature from 1989 to 2015 and covered six regions across the six ecological zones in Ghana. Western, Greater Accra, Ashanti, Brong Ahafo, Northern and Upper East Regions were selected respectively from Rainforest, Coastal Savannah, Semi-Deciduous Rain forest, Forest Savannah Transition, Guinea Savannah and Sudan Savannah ecological zones. Aside the differences in ecological zones, the selected regions also exhibit different rainfall and temperature characteristics.

2.3. Data analysis

The researchers screened the data for missing values and filled missing values through last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) approach, which has been used in previous studies (Chepkoech et al., 2018). In applying LOCF, missing numerical values are imputed with preceding values (Chepkoech et al., 2018). The imputed and observed values are then analyzed as if there was no missing values in the data (Lachin, 2016). Monthly and annual data were computed. The study used descriptive statistics to understand monthly, annual and seasonal characteristics of rainfall and temperature in ecological zones in Ghana. Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation (SD) and variance were computed. Other computations included range, kurtosis, skewness and coefficient of variation (CV). Coefficient of variation was computed as sdx and was used with standard deviation to examine variability and predictability of climate (Nyatuame et al., 2014).

To examine rainfall and temperature trends in ecological zones in Ghana, the study employed Mann Kendall test, linear regression and linear plots. These tests have been widely used in previous studies (Chepkoech et al., 2018; Jaiswal et al., 2015; Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Longobardi and Villani, 2010; Nkrumah et al., 2014; Nyatuame et al., 2014). Mann Kendall is one of the non-parametric tests that has gained dominance in climate trend studies (Jaiswal et al., 2015; Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018), as it is flexible to normality and homogeneity and insensitive to sharp breaks in time series data (Jaiswal et al., 2015; Karmeshu, 2015). Thus, it does not require data to be normally distributed and homogenous. In Mann Kendall test, non-detect data are assigned common values and the assigned values are smaller than the smallest value in the data set (Blackwell Publishing, cited in Karmeshu, 2015:15). According to Jaiswal et al. (2015) Mann Kendall test sequentially compares data in the data set to each other. In the process of comparison, Karmeshu (2015) stipulates that Mann Kendall (S) statistic is incremented by 1, if the value of a later time period is higher than the value of an earlier time period. Alternatively, a decrement of 1 occurs if the value of a later time period is lower than the value of an earlier time period (Karmeshu, 2015). The test also assumes that data set is randomly ordered and independent. Hence, it tests the null hypothesis that there is no trend (Chepkoech et al., 2018; Jaiswal et al., 2015). The alternative hypothesis assumes that there is a trend in the data. The use of Mann Kendall helped to explore relationships and patterns of temperature and rainfall in six regions within six ecological zones in Ghana. A positive S value indicates an upward trend and vice versa. The study used Addinsoft XLSTAT 2016 software for Mann Kendall test.

Linear regression analysis explored relationships and patterns in temperature and rainfall. Previous studies used linear regression to assess temperature and rainfall trends and relationships (Chepkoech et al., 2018; Jaiswal et al., 2015; Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Longobardi and Villani, 2010; Nkrumah et al., 2014; Nyatuame et al., 2014). In performing linear regression test, a straight line is fitted to the data. The slope of the fitted line may or may not necessarily differ significantly from zero (Jaiswal et al., 2015; Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Nkrumah et al., 2014). The dependent variables (Y) were temperature and rainfall and the independent variable (X) was year. In addition, trends lines for each ecological zone was plotted and the coefficient of determination (R2) (Pallant, 2016) determined the relationship between rainfall/temperature and year. Moreover, the study assessed mean differences in temperature and rainfall in ecological zones. To do this, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was performed. Where significant mean differences were found, post-hoc comparison with Tukey HDS test examined the differences between the means. The null hypothesis stated that there is no significant differences in mean temperature and rainfall between the ecological zones while the alternative hypothesis assumed that there is a significant differences in mean temperature and rainfall between the ecological zones.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive statistics of rainfall and temperature in ecological zones

The total rainfall in the deciduous forest from 1989 to 2015 was 85391.5mm (M = 3126.7mm; SD = 226.3mm) while the average annual rainfall was 7116mm (M = 263.6mm; SD = 18.9mm) as shown in Table 2a. The major raining season had a mean rainfall of 2003.6mm with a standard deviation of 171.1 mm at a range of 953.6mm. The major raining season in the deciduous forest was negatively skewed (-3.621mm) but significantly peaked (16.195mm). The minor raining season had the highest deviation of 199.8mm indicating a high degree of inconsistency and variability of rains in the minor season. Low coefficient of variation associated with total annual, average annual, major and minor rains indicates high reliability and dependability of rainfall particularly for agricultural purpose. The highest mean monthly rainfall in the deciduous forest is June (M = 551.4mm; SD = 72.3mm) which contributes about 17.6% of total annual rainfall. Surprisingly, September received the maximum rainfall of 846.3mm. With the exception of January, February, August, November and December, the monthly rains in the deciduous forest are highly dependable and reliable with coefficient of variation less than 0.5mm. Table 2b presents the temperature statistics in the deciduous forest. The average annual temperature is 27 °C with a low standard deviation of 0.62 °C which indicates less variation or dispersion in temperature. February and March are the hottest months with maximum temperature of 30.3 °C and 30.4 °C respectively while June and July being the coolest temperature months in the deciduous forest.

Table 2a.

Statistical summary of rainfall in deciduous forest.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Total Annual rainfall 756.3 2766.7 3523.0 85391.5 3126.7 226.3 51224.8 -0.039 -1.244 0.07
Average Annual 63.0 230.6 293.6 7116 263.6 18.9 355.7 -0.039 -1.244 0.07
Major season 953.6 1247.5 2183.1 52094 2003.6 171.1 29266.6 -3.621 16.195 0.09
Minor season 818.3 524.3 1342.6 21239.8 816.9 199.8 39910.2 0.568 0.177 0.2
Dry season 453.9 10.5 464.4 5032.1 193.5 115.7 13383.8 0.475 -0.078 0.6
Jan 141.8 2.0 143.8 1265.8 46.9 37.1 1376.6 0.852 0.576 0.8
Feb 184.0 3.0 187.0 2332.6 86.4 60.3 3632.9 0.101 -1.344 0.7
Mar 281.8 135.4 417.2 7389.8 273.7 59 3483.5 0.213 1.011 0.2
Apr 322.0 198.7 520.7 9545.7 353.5 75.9 5766.3 0.494 0.218 0.2
May 366.6 258.6 625.2 12720.4 471.1 100.4 10088.7 -0.553 -0.229 0.2
Jun 284.3 381.8 666.1 14886.5 551.4 72.3 5234.7 -0.446 -0.444 0.1
Jul 392.2 116.9 509.1 9564 354.2 84.6 7158.3 -0.519 1.140 0.2
Aug 353.3 8.1 361.4 4085 151.3 90.9 8254.7 0.533 -0.123 0.6
Sep 668.3 178.7 846.3 10111.8 374.5 133.4 17805.1 1.757 5.051 0.4
Oct 372.3 135.2 525.2 8969.7 332.2 102.9 10588.7 0.098 -0.877 0.4
Nov 303.5 15.4 318.9 2904.4 107.6 95.5 5700.8 0.995 0.727 0.9
Dec 278.9 1.4 280.3 1615.8 59.8 61.8 3851.2 2.293 6.322 1.0

Table 2b.

Statistical summary of temperature in deciduous forest.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Average Annual 2.2 25.7 28 729.2 27 0.62 0.38 -0.76 0.17 0.02
Jan 3.6 25.1 28.7 733.2 27.1 0.87 0.76 -0.47 -0.01 0.03
Feb 3.8 26.4 30.3 767.4 28.4 1.03 1.06 -0.14 -0.87 0.04
Mar 3.3 27.1 30.4 777.4 28.8 0.81 0.65 -0.25 -0.45 0.03
Apr 2.9 26 28.9 755.4 28 0.71 0.50 -1.02 0.94 0.03
May 2.8 25.8 28.6 742.7 27.5 0.78 0.60 -0.75 0.11 0.03
Jun 3.0 24.7 27.7 717.7 26.6 0.84 0.71 -1.14 0.74 0.03
Jul 2.8 23.8 26.5 691.1 25.6 0.73 0.53 -1.33 1.05 0.03
Aug 2.7 23.5 26.1 683.8 25.3 0.79 0.62 -1.43 1.16 0.03
Sep 2.4 24.2 26.6 697.8 25.8 0.65 0.42 -0.97 0.33 0.03
Oct 2.5 25.2 27.7 719.8 26.7 0.63 0.40 -0.76 0.002 0.02
Nov 2.5 28.4 28.3 735.1 27.2 0.70 0.48 -1.03 0.13 0.03
Dec 3.4 24.8 28.2 729.2 27 0.94 0.88 -0.57 -0.03 0.04

The transitional zone, as shown in Table 3a has total rainfall of 104110mm (M = 3855.9mm; SD = 445.2mm). The major and minor raining seasons are reliable and dependable with coefficient of variation less than 0.5mm. The major raining season is also variable or inconsistent than the minor raining season, with a high standard deviation of 313.9mm. The wettest month is June, with an average rainfall of 549.2mm. However, September is the month that received the maximum rainfall (1040.1mm). The results also show that rainfall in month of July in the transitional zone is highly variable, with a high standard deviation of 160mm. Unsurprisingly, the month with the lowest mean monthly rainfall was January (37.2mm), followed by December, which recorded an average rainfall of 62.1mm. Rainfall in January, February, November and December are highly unreliable, with high coefficient of variation. In the case of temperature, the average annual temperature in the transitional zone is 27 °C with the hottest temperature recorded in February (30.3 °C) and March (30.4 °C) as shown in Table 3b. July and August are the coolest temperature months with 23.8 °C and 23.5 °C respectively.

Table 3a.

Statistical summary of rainfall in transition zone.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Total Annual rainfall 1963.3 2923.6 4899.9 104110 3855.9 445.2 19200.7 0.153 0.239 0.12
Average Annual 164.7 243.6 408.3 8675.8 321.3 37.1 1376.5 0.153 0.239 0.12
Major season 1351.4 1404.6 2756.0 57479 2128.8 313.9 98523.1 -0.146 -0.005 0.09
Minor season 1065.7 775.6 1841.3 33398 1236.9 265.9 70715.9 0.512 0.359 0.2
Dry season 524.4 66.2 509.6 55046 211.7 138.2 19086.2 1.398 1.788 0.7
Jan 123.7 4.4 128.1 1004.8 37.2 33.1 1094.7 1.439 1.300 0.9
Feb 312.0 26.6 338.6 3097.3 114.7 69.3 4796.9 1.231 2.747 0.6
Mar 485.4 49.6 535.0 6768.2 250.7 104.2 10853.9 0.797 1.653 0.4
Apr 481.7 242.6 724.3 12816 474.7 135.5 18359.3 -0.078 -0.860 0.3
May 532.4 307.6 840.0 13410 496.7 128.6 16548.8 0.781 0.444 0.3
Jun 485.7 274.7 760.4 14829 549.2 139.4 19427.3 -0.235 -0.699 0.3
Jul 763.7 63.8 827.5 96558 357.6 160.0 25602.1 0.830 1.772 0.4
Aug 574.9 22.6 597.5 7452.0 276.0 141.3 19966.0 0.266 -0.266 0.5
Sep 740.3 299.8 1040.1 14732 545.6 156.8 24579.1 1.020 2.324 0.3
Oct 564.1 262.4 826.5 14381 532.6 150.8 22755.5 -0.007 -0.421 0.3
Nov 310.2 16.6 326.8 4284.4 158.7 88.5 7833.2 0.151 -0.930 0.6
Dec 405.2 8.4 413.6 1679.3 62.1 96.3 9282.4 3.020 8.850 1.6

Table 3b.

Statistical summary of temperature in transition zone.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Average Annual 2.2 25.7 28 729.2 27 0.62 0.38 -0.76 0.17 0.02
Jan 3.6 25.1 28.7 733.2 27.1 0.87 0.76 -0.47 -0.01 0.03
Feb 3.8 26.4 30.3 767.4 28.4 1.03 1.06 -0.14 -0.87 0.04
Mar 3.3 27.1 30.4 777.4 28.8 0.81 0.65 -0.25 -0.45 0.03
Apr 2.9 26 28.9 755.4 28 0.71 0.50 -1.02 0.94 0.03
May 2.8 25.8 28.6 742.7 27.5 0.78 0.60 -0.75 0.11 0.03
Jun 3.0 24.7 27.7 717.7 26.6 0.84 0.71 -1.14 0.74 0.03
Jul 2.8 23.8 26.5 691.1 25.6 0.73 0.53 -1.33 1.05 0.03
Aug 2.7 23.5 26.1 683.8 25.3 0.79 0.62 -1.43 1.16 0.03
Sep 2.4 24.2 26.6 697.8 25.8 0.65 0.42 -0.97 0.33 0.03
Oct 2.5 25.2 27.7 719.8 26.7 0.63 0.40 -0.76 0.002 0.02
Nov 2.5 28.4 28.3 735.1 27.2 0.70 0.48 -1.03 0.13 0.03
Dec 3.4 24.8 28.2 729.2 27 0.94 0.88 -0.57 -0.03 0.04

Table 4a shows the distribution of rainfall in the coastal savannah. The results show that the average annual rainfall in this ecological zone is 3228.7mm (M = 119.6mm; SD = 25.3), as shown in Table 4a. With the exception of the major season (CV = 0.2), minor and dry seasonal rains are unreliable with 0.6 coefficient of variation each. However, the major season rains are dispersed and inconsistent with high standard deviation of 241.6mm. The month of June is the wettest month with total rainfall of 8983.3mm (M = 332.7mm; SD = 161.2mm). Also, monthly rainfall in the coastal savannah are highly unreliable, with coefficient of variations greater than 0.5mm, with the exception of rainfall in the month of May. The month with the lowest amount of rainfall is January, which recorded a total rainfall of 594.6mm, followed by the month of August (860mm). Rainfall in December is significantly peaked (Kurtosis = 6.217) and skewed to the right (Skewness = 2.091). For temperature in the coastal savannah, the average temperature is 27.8 °C as shown in Table 4b. Temperature is fairly consistent with low coefficient of variations. The hottest months are February, March and April with mean temperature of 29.4 °C, 29.1 °C and 29.3 °C respectively.

Table 4a.

Statistical summary of rainfall in coastal savannah.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Total Annual rainfall 1108.4 850.9 1959.3 38744 1435 303.5 92112.3 -0.171 -0.600 0.2
Average Annual 92.4 70.9 163.3 3228.7 119.6 25.3 639.7 -0.171 -0.600 0.2
Major season 1071.5 435.5 1507 27314 1011.6 241.6 58350.6 -0.275 0.044 0.2
Minor season 544.2 59.2 603.4 7201.1 266.7 147 21612.4 0.281 -0.597 0.6
Dry season 255.7 5.3 262 3247.2 124.9 76.9 5912.1 0.288 -1.054 0.6
Jan 78.6 0.6 79.2 594.6 22.0 18.9 358.2 1.248 1.659 0.9
Feb 202 0 202 1659.2 61.5 56.6 3206.9 0.818 -0.213 0.9
Mar 343.9 2.3 346.2 2884.2 106.8 86.4 7468.7 1.473 1.961 0.8
Apr 305.5 52.7 358.2 4979 184.4 85.3 7278.9 0.345 -1.085 0.5
May 334.1 96.5 430.8 7426.4 275.1 78.6 6170.7 -0.077 0.240 0.3
Jun 653.1 102.7 755.8 8983.3 332.7 161.2 25996.6 0.784 0.373 0.5
Jul 365.4 5.9 371.3 3041.3 112.6 86.1 7407.9 1.390 2.138 0.8
Aug 137.3 0.1 137.4 860 31.9 33.6 1126.5 1.801 3.165 1.1
Sep 264.5 4.6 269.1 2102.4 77.9 75.8 5749.6 1.369 1.172 1.0
Oct 337.1 2.1 339.2 3626.3 134.3 98 9596.8 0.505 -0.692 0.7
Nov 152 14.3 166.3 1472.4 54.5 35 1219.6 1.333 2.538 0.6
Dec 188.6 0.1 188.7 1115.3 41.3 40 1593.9 2.091 6.217 1.0

Table 4b.

Statistical summary of temperature in coastal savannah.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Average Annual 1.3 27 28.3 751.1 27.8 0.44 0.197 -0.735 -1.148 0.01
Jan 4.3 26.3 28.4 742.9 27.5 0.98 0.956 -0.608 0.291 0.03
Feb 4.2 28.1 30.2 782.1 29.4 1.10 1.204 0.350 -0.647 0.04
Mar 3.5 28.2 30 790.2 29.1 0.98 0.958 -0.588 -0.839 0.03
Apr 4.1 28.1 30.1 790.9 29.3 1.09 1.193 -0.488 -0.245 0.04
May 4.1 27.2 28.4 770.1 28.2 1.08 1.165 -0.718 -0.352 0.03
Jun 2.8 26.5 27.9 736.1 27.3 0.66 0.435 -0.718 -0.241 0.02
Jul 4.4 24.6 26.8 697.1 25.8 1.46 2.137 -0.471 -1.291 0.06
Aug 4.0 24.1 26.1 678.3 25.1 1.13 1.285 0.019 -1.290 0.04
Sep 5.1 25 27.6 709.6 26.3 1.37 1.889 -0.187 -0.948 0.05
Oct 4.5 26.4 28.7 749.4 27.8 1.29 1.676 -0.535 -1.016 0.04
Nov 2.8 28.1 29.8 783.8 29.2 0.76 0.584 -0.593 -0.474 0.03
Dec 2.9 27.9 28.4 778.3 28.8 0.74 0.545 -0.819 0.268 0.03

The Guinea savannah receives a total annual rainfall of 29136mm (M = 1079.1mm; SD = 86.15mm) as shown in Table 5a. Both major and dry rains are fairly reliable with 0.09mm and 0.1mm coefficient of variations respectively, which peaks at 651.1mm for the major rains and 654.6mm for the dry season rains. It is interesting to note that why the Guinea savannah has just mono-modal rainfall pattern, the observance of a minimum and maximum rainfall of 369.7mm and 654.6mm respectively for the dry season rains indicates a typical change in the rainfall pattern, which may be associated with climate change. Although the raining season in Guinea savannah usually starts in June, the data shows that rainfall picks up from April with a maximum rainfall of 2666.3mm and peaks in September at a maximum rainfall of 5340mm. There is a remarkable increase in the amount of rainfall received in October, which is unusual of the Guinea savannah. Rainfall from April to October is reliable with coefficient of variations less than 0.5. The average annual temperature in the Guinea savannah zone is 28.3 °C as shown in Table 5b. The minimum temperature ranges between 25.7 °C to 30.5 °C while the maximum temperature is between 26.6 °C and 32.4 °C. The hottest months are February, March, April and May with maximum temperature of 32.1 °C, 32.4 °C, 32.4 °C and 30.2 °C respectively. The month of August is the coolest month. In general, temperature has been fairly consistent in this ecological zone with less variation.

Table 5a.

Statistical summary of rainfall in Guinea savannah.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Total Annual rainfall 345.5 883.3 1228.2 29136 1079.1 86.15 7421.5 -0.348 -0.309 0.08
Average Annual 28.8 73.6 102.4 2428 89.9 7.18 51.2 -0.348 -0.308 0.08
Major season 193.5 455.9 651.1 13977 537.6 50.31 2531.3 0.361 -0.172 0.09
Dry season 284.9 369.7 654.6 14048 540.3 72.40 5241.1 -0.653 -0.211 0.1
Jan 32.4 0 32.4 94.1 3.458 7.72 59.63 2.723 7.529 2.2
Feb 25.4 0 25.4 273.8 10.141 9.30 86.47 0.249 -1.529 0.9
Mar 83.3 0 83.3 917.7 33.987 21.94 481.4 0.629 -0.175 0.6
Apr 109.6 38.9 148.5 2666.3 98.753 30.20 9112 -0.036 -0.725 0.3
May 86.2 77.3 163.4 3247.2 120.27 20.28 411.3 -0.317 -0.028 0.2
Jun 122.1 97.4 219.5 4161.4 154.13 28.14 791.6 0.482 0.021 0.2
Jul 158.3 86.8 244.8 4305.4 159.46 31.07 965.5 0.306 1.498 0.2
Aug 179.1 96.2 275.3 4765.6 176.50 42.21 1781.6 0.426 0.303 0.2
Sep 118.4 139 257.4 5430 201.11 32.10 1030.7 -0.186 -0.859 0.2
Oct 194.3 36.9 186.2 2885.4 106.87 35.65 1270.8 0.133 0.206 0.3
Nov 41.2 0 41.2 283.1 10.484 10.28 105.6 1.341 1.835 1.0
Dec 34.8 0 34.8 105.7 3.915 7.40 54.7 3.318 12.282 1.9

Table 5b.

Statistical summary of temperature in Guinea savannah.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Average Annual 1.0 27.8 28.8 763.3 28.3 0.28 0.077 0.227 -0.832 0.009
Jan 2.1 26.7 28.8 748.2 27.7 0.55 0.303 0.138 -0.542 0.02
Feb 4.3 27.8 32.1 808.8 30.1 1.07 1.155 0.017 -0.166 0.04
Mar 1.9 30.5 32.4 849.6 31.5 0.51 0.261 0.031 -0.660 0.02
Apr 2.5 29.9 32.4 829.7 30.7 0.60 0.366 1.463 2.622 0.02
May 2.3 27.9 30.2 788.4 29.2 0.55 0.304 -0.396 0.175 0.02
Jun 1.8 26.7 28.5 743.7 27.5 0.43 0.189 0.038 -0.310 0.02
Jul 1.4 26.1 27.5 717.2 26.6 0.32 0.105 1.129 1.390 0.01
Aug 0.9 25.7 26.6 706.9 26.2 0.25 0.064 0.213 -0.832 0.01
Sep 1.2 26 27.2 718.4 26.6 0.33 0.115 0.040 -1.008 0.01
Oct 1.6 26.8 28.4 744.8 27.6 0.41 0.171 0.018 -0.250 0.01
Nov 2.8 26.9 29.7 704.4 28.2 0.61 0.384 -0.127 0.856 0.02
Dec 2.6 26.2 28.8 742.6 27.5 0.63 0.398 -0.023 -0.254 0.02

The results of rainfall distribution in the Sudan Savannah zone is shown in Table 6a. The results of rainfall and temperature distribution in Sudan savannah is 25827mm (M = 956.6mm; SD = 2.5.6mm), with the main raining season receiving a maximum of 1026.6mm of rainfall as opposed to 534.5mm for the dry season. The month of August is the wettest month with total rainfall of 7028.8mm while January is the driest month with total rainfall of 50.2mm, followed by December, with 76.6mm of rainfall. Rainfall in November and December is positively skewed and highly peaked. Also rainfall in Sudan savannah is highly unreliable in almost all the months, except for July, August and September. In the case of temperature, the Sudan savannah records an annual average temperature of 29.2 °C with February, March, April, May, June and November being the hottest months as shown in Table 6b. There is less variation in temperature in Sudan savannah.

Table 6a.

Statistical summary of rainfall in Sudan savannah.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Total Annual rainfall 998.9 366.4 1365.3 25827 956.55 215.58 46474.5 -0.924 1.698 0.2
Average Annual 83.3 30.5 113.8 2166.8 80.25 18.07 326.7 -0.995 1.715 0.2
Major season 872.2 154 1026.2 15885 588.35 174.54 30462.8 -0.254 1.837 0.3
Dry season 274.1 260.4 534.5 9705.1 373.27 83.14 6912.8 0.751 -0.635 0.2
Jan 12.2 0 12.2 50.2 1.859 2.79 7.80 2.187 6.192 1.5
Feb 26.8 0 26.8 179 6.630 8.48 71.85 1.249 0.096 1.3
Mar 34 0 34 269.9 9.996 10.85 117.71 0.947 -0.290 1.1
Apr 137.8 2.8 176.6 1524 56.44 45.46 2066.7 1.505 1.638 0.8
May 180.9 13.7 194.6 2780.4 102.98 50.10 2509.9 0.081 -0.962 0.5
Jun 190 38.7 228.7 3438.4 127.35 52.45 2751.2 0.295 -0.524 0.5
Jul 221.3 91.3 312.6 4884.6 180.91 63.40 4020 0.440 -0.741 0.4
Aug 432.3 23.2 455.5 7028.8 260.33 104.32 10882.3 -0.130 0.069 0.4
Sep 270.6 27.2 297.8 3972 147.11 65.04 4230.2 0.283 0.086 0.4
Oct 129.4 4.2 133.6 1472.6 54.54 33 1088.9 0.347 -0.458 0.6
Nov 43.4 0 43.4 150.4 6.02 11.29 127.39 2.124 4.337 1.9
Dec 33.6 0 33.6 76.6 2.387 8.74 76.32 3.300 9.940 3.7

Table 6b.

Statistical summary of temperature in Sudan savannah.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Average Annual 1.3 28.6 29.9 788.5 29.2 0.33 0.11 0.568 0.184 0.01
Jan 4.1 25.5 29.6 750.3 27.8 1.03 1.07 -0.260 -0.560 0.04
Feb 4.4 28.3 32.7 821.7 30.4 1.07 1.15 -0.149 -0555 0.04
Mar 3.3 31 34.4 886 32.8 0.77 0.59 -0.335 0.127 0.02
Apr 2.9 31.4 34.3 884.6 32.8 0.74 0.55 0.014 -0.447 0.02
May 3.9 28.7 32.7 834.6 30.9 1.01 1.02 -0.437 -0.259 0.03
Jun 2.5 27.5 30 775.9 28.7 0.67 0.45 -0.077 -0.561 0.02
Jul 2.1 26.4 28.5 738.2 27.3 0.45 0.20 0.566 0.801 0.02
Aug 1.6 26.2 27.8 722.5 26.8 0.38 0.15 0.860 1.129 0.02
Sep 1.4 26.6 28 734.5 27.2 0.36 0.13 0.606 0.008 0.01
Oct 2.0 27.8 29.7 773.9 28.7 0.60 0.36 0.221 -0.937 0.02
Nov 3.7 27 30.7 783.5 29 0.85 0.72 -0.216 0.399 0.03
Dec 2.4 27 29.4 757 28 0.67 0.44 0.232 -1.019 0.02

Rainfall and temperature distributions in the rain forest zone are shown in Tables 7a and b respectively. The results indicate that average annual rainfall in the rain forest is 8548.2mm with a mean of 316.6mm and a standard deviation of 24.3mm. Seasonal rainfall is reliable, both in the wet and season. The month of June is the wettest month and contributes about 22% of total annual rainfall. The driest month in this zone is January, with an average rainfall of 69.39mm, followed by February with 108mm average rainfall. Surprisingly, although the months of November and December are mostly in the dry season in the rain forest zone, rainfall in this zone are fairly good. The results also show that with the exception of rainfall in January, February, July, August and December, monthly rainfall in the rain forest is dependable and reliable particularly for agricultural purpose. In the case of temperature, the results show an average annual temperature of 27.3 °C with a standard deviation of 0.28 °C. Minimum temperature ranges from 24.7 °C to 27.6 °C while maximum ranges from 26.4 °C to 30.2 °C. March is the hottest month while August is the coolest month. There is less variation in temperature in this zone as it is the case in other zones.

Table 7a.

Statistical summary of rainfall in Rain forest.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Total Annual rainfall 1117.5 3258.9 4353.4 102579 3799 291 84824 -0.186 -0.183 0.08
Average Annual 93.1 269.7 362.8 8548.2 316.6 24.3 589 -0.186 -0.183 0.08
Major season 789.3 2074.5 2863.8 64548 2391 232 53875 0.834 -0453 0.1
Minor season 796.3 650.5 1446.8 25359 939.2 192 36880 0.824 0.631 0.2
Dry season 574.5 127.1 701.6 7627 293.4 120 14293 1.676 4.290 0.4
Jan 142.8 2.8 145.6 1873.4 69.39 46.7 2179.4 0.173 -1.366 0.7
Feb 183 16.1 199.1 2915.9 108 50 2499 0.002 -0.843 0.5
Mar 249.8 134.8 384.6 7287.9 269.9 68.3 4660 -0.282 -0.622 0.3
Apr 398.5 214.5 613 10083 379.4 103 10696 0.674 -0.139 0.3
May 544.7 237.8 782.5 14806 548.4 137 18662 -0.351 -0.343 0.3
Jun 551.5 559.1 1110.6 22174 821.3 149 22263 0.275 -0.585 0.2
Jul 725.9 28.8 754.7 10197 377.7 171 29280 0.400 -0.138 0.5
Aug 401.9 13.4 415.3 4634.1 171.6 103 10645 0.471 -0.235 0.6
Sep 355.1 79.8 434.9 7192.6 266.4 81.3 6607 -0363 0.720 0.3
Oct 675 183.3 858.3 11295 418.3 159 25348 0.837 0.782 0.4
Nov 283 89 372 6872 254.5 80.8 6531 -0264 -0.787 0.3
Dec 472.2 13.5 485.7 3247.9 120.3 87 7565 3.088 12.093 0.7

Table 7b.

Statistical summary of temperature in Rain forest.

Parameter (mm) Range Min Max Sum Mean SD Variance Skewness Kurtosis CV
Average Annual 1.0 26.9 27.9 738.3 27.3 0.28 0.077 -0.099 1.021 0.01
Jan 2.3 26.2 28.5 738,2 27.3 0.54 0.295 -0.044 -0.112 0.02
Feb 2.5 27.3 29.8 773.3 28.7 0.65 0.424 -0.325 -0.358 0.02
Mar 3.1 27.1 30.2 775.2 28.7 0.60 0.355 -0.150 1.951 0.02
Apr 1.9 27.6 29.5 768.8 28.5 0.50 0.259 0.157 -0.810 0.02
May 1.3 27.4 28.7 754.2 27.9 0.33 0.110 0.558 -0.090 0.01
Jun 1.6 26.2 27.8 727 26.9 0.38 0.143 0.164 -0.297 0.01
Jul 1.5 25.3 26.8 704.9 26.1 0.39 0.150 -0.272 -0.166 0.01
Aug 1.8 24.7 26.4 690.9 25.6 0.42 0.175 0.282 0.039 0.02
Sep 1.2 25.5 26.8 708.4 26.2 0.33 0.108 -0.624 -0.282 0.01
Oct 1.5 26 27.5 728.7 27 0.37 0.137 -0.751 0.265 0.01
Nov 1.7 26.6 28.3 745.4 27.6 0.43 0.188 -0.419 -0.131 0.02
Dec 1.7 26.6 28.3 742.4 27.5 0.46 0.211 -0.161 -0.796 0.02

3.2. Trend analysis of rainfall and temperature in ecological zones

The results for the trend analysis of rainfall and temperature in the deciduous forest ecological zone is shown in Fig. 2, which indicates an increasing trend in rainfall and temperature. However, the monthly rainfall which depicts the bi-modal rainfall pattern in the deciduous forest shows a decreasing trend. Unlike the trend plots, the results of the Mann-Kendall test in Table 8 indicate no significant trend in rainfall except for temperature where an increasing trend is detected. In addition, the linear regression results show an upward trend in rainfall and temperature in the deciduous forest. Except temperature which showed a significant trend (p < 0.05), there is no significant trends in seasonal and average rainfall. In addition, there is a weak relationship between rainfall and temperature and year as shown by the R-square statistic.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Trends of rainfall and temperature in deciduous forest. NB. SEA in legend of figures means season.

Table 8.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of rainfall and temperature in deciduous forest.

Variables MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Minor raining season 27.0 0.083 0.571 No trend Y = 2.787X-4761.15 0.011 0.604
Major raining season -55.0 -0.17 0.237 No trend Y = 3.013X-4026.75 0.018 0.512
Dry season rainfall 89.0 0.274 0.053 No trend Y = 3.680X-7171.23 0.020 0.231
Average annual rainfall 59.0 0.168 0.230 No trend Y = 0.556X-850.33 0.055 0.240
Average annual temp 99.0 0.28 0.040* Trend detected Y = 0.027X-26.526 0.118 0.079

∗ indicates p<0.05

In the transition zone (see Fig. 3), there is an increasing trend for major, minor, monthly and annual average rainfall and temperature. However, dry season rainfall show a decreasing trend. The Mann-Kendall test results in Table 9 shows a significant positive trend in minor season rainfall (p = 0.045) and temperature (p = 0.001), and an insignificant downward trend in dry season rainfall. The regression results equally show a downward trend in dry season rains. In addition, the regression results reveal a signigicant upward trends in minor season raifall and temperature and an insignificant upward trend in dry, major and annual rainfall.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Trend of rainfall and temperature in transition zone.

Table 9.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of rainfall and temperature in transition zone.

Variables MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Minor raining season 97.0 0.276 0.045* Trend detected Y = 13.41X-25607.8 0.160 0.039*
Major raining season 63.0 0.179 0.199 No trend Y = 11.75X-31286.1 0.088 0.132
Dry season rainfall -7.00 -0.022 0.896 No trend Y = -4.39X+9001.3 0.059 0.231
Average annual rainfall 77.0 0.219 0.114 No trend Y = 1.785X-3251.9 0.146 0.049*
Average annual temp 172.0 0.424 0.001* Trend detected Y = 0.032X-36.288 0.285 0.004*

∗ indicates p<0.05

The monthly rainfall in the coastal savannah reveals a bi-modal rainfall pattern and a decreasing trend in montly rainfall as shown in Fig. 4. There is, also, an increasing trend in temperature, minor, major and dry season rainfall. However, there is no significant trend in rainfall as shown by the Mann-Kendall test results in Table 10. The regression analysis shows an upward but insignificant weak trends in major and dry season rainfall while a significant trend and moderate relationship is detected in minor and annual rainfall and temperature.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Trends of rainfall and temperature in coastal savannah.

Table 10.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of rainfall and temperature in coastal savannah.

Variables MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Minor raining season 89.0 0.254 0.067 No trend Y = 6.966X-13678.9 0.41 0.053
Major raining season 57.0 0.162 0.246 No trend Y = 4.853X-8704.4 0.025 0.427
Dry season rainfall 5.00 0.015 0.931 No trend Y = 1.000X-1876.6 0.010 0.629
Average annual rainfall 81.0 0.231 0.096 No trend Y = 1.167X-2216.9 0.134 0.060
Average annual temp 193.0 0.550 0.000* Trend detected Y = 0.041X-54.377 0.539 0.000*

∗ indicates p<0.05

In Fig. 5, we present the monthly rainfall pattern of the Guinea Savannah agroecological zone, which shows a mono-modal rainfall pattern. The trend plots reveal an increasing trend in monthly, major, dry and annual rainfall and temperature. In the case of trend analysis in Table 11, Mann-Kendall test detected significant trends in dry season rainfall and temperature, which were also confirmed by the regression analysis. The regression analysis however, showed a weak relationship for major, dry, annual rainfall and temperature as indicated by the weak R-square statistic.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Trends of rainfall and temperature in Guinea savannah.

Table 11.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of rainfall and temperature in Guinea savannah.

Variables MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Major raining season 45.0 0.138 0.336 No trend Y = 0.643X-748.7 0.010 0.635
Dry season rainfall 109.0 0.335 0.016* Trend detected Y = 4.355–8175.2 0.212 0.018*
Average annual rainfall 81.0 0.231 0.096 No trend Y = 0.556X-850.33 0.055 0.240
Average annual temp 159.0 0.453 0.001* Trend detected Y = 0.327X-564.2 0.131 0.064

∗ indicates p<0.05

A mono-modal rainfall pattern was also revealed in the Sudan savannah as shown in Fig. 6. The result shows increasing trends for monthly, major, dry and annual rainfall and temperature. While Mann-Kendall test in Table 12 detected no trend in rainfall and temperature, a downward trend (S = -7.00) is observed in major raining season concurred with a similar trend in the regression analysis. The regression results showed no significant trend in rainfall and climate variables while a weak relationship is established between dependent variables (rainfall and temperature) and independent variable (year).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Trends of rainfall and temperature in Sudan savannah.

Table 12.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of rainfall and temperature in Sudan savannah.

Variables MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Major raining season -7.00 -0.020 0.902 No trend Y = -0.512X+1613.2 0.001 0.908
Dry season rainfall 35.0 0.108 0.458 No trend Y = 1.724X-3077.0 0.025 0.439
Average annual rainfall 37.0 0.105 0.457 No trend Y = 0.274X-467.3 0.014 0.551
Average annual temp 87.0 0.248 0.073 No trend Y = 0.011X+7.584 0.067 0.193

∗ indicates p<0.05

In the case of rain forest, there is a bi-modal rainfall pattern (see Fig. 7). The trend plot reveals a decreasing trend of monthly, major, minor, dry season and annual rainfall. Temperature however, showed an increasing trend. Mann-Kendall test and linear regression results in Table 13 showed an insignificant downward trend in major and average annual rainfall while a downward trend was shown in minor season rains from regression analysis. In addition, Mann-Kendall and linear regression showed significant trend in temperature (p < 0.05).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Trends of rainfall and temperature in rain forest.

Table 13.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of rainfall and temperature in rain forest.

Variables MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Minor raining season 17.0 0.048 0.741 No trend Y = -0.501X+1941.5 0.000 0.918
Major raining season -39.0 -0.111 0.433 No trend Y = -3.064X+8524.4 0.011 0.603
Dry season rainfall 83.0 0.255 0.071 No trend Y = 2.365X-4439.8 0.023 0.416
Average annual rainfall -7.00 -0.020 0.902 No trend Y = -0.360X+1037.5 0.014 0.559
Average annual temp 181.0 0.516 0.000* Trend detected Y = 0.023X-18.640 0.434 0.000*

∗ indicates p<0.05

The trends of total annual rainfall in ecological zones in Ghana are presented in Fig. 8. The results reveal an oscillatory trends of rainfall across ecological zones in Ghana. While an increasing trend is detected in deciduous forest, transition zone, rain forest and coastal savannah, a consistent regular trend is found in Sudan and Guinea savannah zones. There is also more variation or oscillation in rainfall in rain forest, deciduous forest, coastal savannah and transition zone than in Guinea and Sudan savannah. This may be explained by the presence of forest, mountains, coastal and river bodies which influence the amount of rainfall received in rain forest, deciduous forest, coastal savannah and transition zone. The Guinea and Sudan savannah have less of the orographic features to influence the amount of rainfall received.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Trend of rainfall in ecological zones.

The trend analysis of rainfall in ecological zones is displayed in Table 14. While Mann-Kendall test showed an insignificant upward trend across all ecological zones, there was a downward insignificant trend in rain forest (S = 7.0). The regression analysis also showed an insignificant downward trend in rainfall in the rain forest. The regression analysis showed an insignificantly weak relationship across ecological zones. The results on trend of temperature show an increasing trend in temperature across ecological zones in Ghana, with more variations observed in deciduous forest and transition zone (see Fig. 9). The highest temperature is recorded in Guinea and Sudan savannah, and this is partly due to their proximity to the Sahara desert, in addition to the absence of orographic features.

Table 14.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of rainfall in ecological zones.

Ecological zones MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Deciduous forest 59.0 0.17 0.23 No trend Y = 6.677X-10203.8 0.055 0.240
Transition zone 77.0 0.23 0.12 No trend Y = 21.417X-39020.8 0.146 0.490
Coastal savannah 81.0 0.23 0.10 No trend Y = 14.003X-26598.6 0.134 0.060
Guinea Savannah 18.0 0.23 0.10 No trend Y = 3.922X-6771.9 0.131 0.064
Sudan savannah 18.0 0.05 0.72 No trend Y = 2.062X-3170.9 0.006 0.707
Rain forest -7.0 -0.02 0.90 No trend Y = -4.323X+12454.4 0.014 0.558

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Trend of temperature in ecological zones.

Table 15 in addition, the Mann-Kendall test revealed an increasing trend in temperature in almost all ecological zones, except for the Sudan savannah agroecological zone. The regression analysis also revealed a significant trend in temperature in transition zone, coastal savannah, Guinea savannah and rain forest, and insignificant trends in deciduous forest and Sudan savannah. The strength of the relationship is displayed by the R-square statistic in the regression analysis. A moderate relationship is observed in transition zone, coastal savannah, Guinea savannah and rain forest while a weak relationship is found in deciduous forest and Sudan savannah.

Table 15.

Mann Kendall and Linear regression of temperature in ecological zones.

Ecological zones MK Statistic (S) Kendall's tau Mann-Kendall test
Regression analysis
p-value Test interpretation Regression equation R2 p-value
Deciduous forest 99.0 0.29 0.041* Trend detected Y = 0.027X-26.527 0.118 0.079
Transition zone 159.0 0.46 0.0001* Trend detected Y = 0.032X-36.288 0.285 0.004*
Coastal savannah 190.0 0.55 0.0001* Trend detected Y = 0.041X-54.377 0.539 0.000*
Guinea Savannah 160.0 0.46 0.001* Trend detected Y = 0.021X-14.423 0.372 0.001*
Sudan savannah 87.0 0.25 0.073 No trend Y = 0.011X+7.584 0.067 0.193
Rain forest 182.0 0.52 0.000* Trend detected Y = 0.023X-18.640 0.434 0.000*

∗ indicates p<0.05

The null hypothesis, which stated that there is no difference in the total annual rainfall in the six ecological zones in Ghana was tested against the alternative hypothesis which stated that there is a significance difference in the total annual rainfall in the six ecological zones in Ghana. The results of the analysis of variance is displayed in Table 16. The results indicate that there is a significant difference in annual rainfall between the ecological zones (F = 635.277, p = 0.000). The post-hoc comparison with Tukey HSD test in Table 17 indicated that there is a significant mean difference in total annual rainfall between deciduous forest and transition zone, coastal savannah, Guinea savannah, Sudan savannah and rain forest. In addition, the transition zone has a statistically significant mean difference between all ecological zones, except the case of rain forest where there is an insignificant difference (mean diff = 56.707, p = 0.977). The results of the post-hoc analysis also show a statistically significant mean difference in annual rainfall between coastal savannah and all other ecological zones. In addition, there is a statistically significant means difference in annual rainfall between Guinea savannah agroecological zone and all ecological zones, except the Sudan savannah agroecological zone, where an insignificant difference is found (mean diff = 122.552, p = 0.605).

Table 16.

Analysis of variance of total rainfall among agroecological zones.

Sum of square df Mean square F Sig.
Between groups 254247133.9 5 50849426.78 635.277 0.000*
Within groups 12486695.6 156 80042.921
Total 266733829.5 161

NB: df = degree of freedom, F = Fisher test.

∗ indicates p<0.05

Table 17.

Post-hoc comparisons of total annual rainfall in ecological zones in Ghana.

(I) Zones (J) Zones Mean difference (I-J) Sig. 95% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Deciduous forest Transition zone -693.259* 0.000 -915.44 -471.08
Coastal savannah 1727.670* 0.000 1505.49 1949.85
Guinea savannah 2083.544* 0.000 1861.36 2305.73
Sudan savannah 2206.096* 0.000 1983.91 2428.28
Rain forest -639.552* 0.000 -858.73 -414.37
Transition zone Deciduous forest 693.259* 0.000 471.08 915.44
Coastal savannah 2420.930* 0.000 2198.75 2643.11
Guinea savannah 2776.804* 0.000 2554.62 2998.99
Sudan savannah 2899.356* 0.000 2677.17 3121.54
Rain forest 56.707 0.977 -156.48 278.89
Coastal savannah Deciduous forest -1727.670* 0.000 -1949.49 -1505.49
Transition zone -2420.390* 0.000 -2643.11 -2198.75
Guinea savannah 355.874* 0.000 133.69 578.06
Sudan savannah 478.426* 0.000 256.24 700.61
Rain forest -2364.222* 0.000 -2586.41 -2142.04
Guinea savannah Deciduous forest -2083.554* 0.000 -2305.73 -1861.36
Transition zone -2776.806 0.000 -2998.99 -2554.62
Coastal savannah -355.874* 0.000 -578.06 -133.69
Sudan savannah 122.552 0.605 -99.63 344.73
Rain forest -2720.096* 0.000 -2942.28 -249791
Sudan savannah Deciduous forest -2206.096* 0.000 -2428.28 858.73
Transition zone -2899.356* 0.000 -3121.54 165.48
Coastal savannah -478.462* 0.000 -700.61 2586.41
Guinea savannah -122.552 0.605 -344.73 2942.28
Rain forest -2842.648* 0.000 -3064.83 3064.83
Rain forest Deciduous forest 636.552* 0.000 414.37 858.73
Transition zone -56.707 0.977 -278.89 165.48
Coastal savannah 2364.222* 0.000 2142.04 2586.41
Guinea savannah 2720.096* 0.000 2497.91 2942.28
Sudan savannah 2842.648* 0.000 2620.27 3064.83

∗ indicates p<0.05

This study also investigated whether there is a significant difference in temperature across agroecological zones and the results are presented in Table 18. The results indicate a statistically significant mean difference in average temperature among the six ecological zones in Ghana (F = 115.589, p = 0.000). In view of the statistically significant difference in average temperature among ecological zones, Table 19 presents the results of the post-hoc comparison with Tukey HSD test. The results indicate that there is a statistically significant mean difference in average temperature between the deciduous forest and all ecological zones, except the transition zone, where an insignificant mean difference exist (mean diff = 0.081, p = 0.980). Moreover, it is revealed that there is a statistically significant mean difference in average temperature between the coastal savannah and the Guinea savannah, Sudan savannah and rain forest agroecological zones.

Table 18.

Analysis of variance of average temperature among agroecological zones.

Sum of square df Mean square F Sig.
Between groups 102.316 5 20.463 115.589 0.000*
Within groups 27.617 156 0.177
Total 129.933 161

NB: df = degree of freedom, F = Fisher test.

∗ indicates p<0.05

Table 19.

Post-hoc comparisons of average temperature in ecological zones in Ghana.

(I) Zones (J) Zones Mean difference (I-J) Sig. 95% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Deciduous forest Transition zone 0.081 0.980 -0.25 0.41
Coastal savannah -0.810* 0.000 -1.14 -0.48
Guinea savannah -1.262* 0.000 -1.59 -0.93
Sudan savannah -2.198* 0.000 -2.53 -1.87
Rain forest -0.333* 0.047 -0.66 0.00
Transition zone Deciduous forest -0.081 0.980 -0.41 0.25
Coastal savannah -0.892* 0.000 -1.22 -0.56
Guinea savannah -1.344* 0.000 -1.67 -1.01
Sudan savannah -2.279 0.000 -2.61 -1.95
Rain forest -0.415* 0.005 -0.75 -0.08
Coastal savannah Deciduous forest 0.810* 0.000 0.48 1.14
Transition zone 0.892* 0.000 0.56 1.22
Guinea savannah -0.452* 0.002 -0.78 -0.12
Sudan savannah -1.387* 0.000 -1.72 -1.06
Rain forest 0.477* 0.001 0.15 0.81
Guinea savannah Deciduous forest 1.262* 0.000 0.93 1.59
Transition zone 1.344* 0.000 1.01 1.67
Coastal savannah 0.452* 0.002 0.12 0.78
Sudan savannah -0.936* 0.000 -1.27 -0.61
Rain forest 0.929* 0.000 0.60 1.26
Sudan savannah Deciduous forest 2.198* 0.000 1.87 2.53
Transition zone 2.279* 0.000 1.95 2.61
Coastal savannah 1.387* 0.000 1.06 1.72
Guinea savannah 0.937* 0.000 0.61 1.27
Rain forest 1.864* 0.000 1.53 2.19
Rain forest Deciduous forest 0.333* 0.047 0.00 0.66
Transition zone 0.415* 0.005 0.08 0.75
Coastal savannah -0.477* 0.001 -0.81 -0.15
Guinea savannah -0.292* 0.000 -1.26 -0.60
Sudan savannah -1.864* 0.000 -2.19 -1.53

∗ indicates p<0.05

4. Discussion and conclusion

Using secondary data on rainfall and temperature, the study has shield light on the extent of climate change across the six agroecological zones in Ghana. In consistent with previous studies which reported rising temperature in different geographic locations in Ghana (Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Nkrumah et al., 2014), this study also found a rising temperature across agroecological zones in Ghana. The trend in temperature has implication on agricultural activities as Ghana's agriculture is rain fed and subsistence in practice. Rising temperature may increase evapotranspiration, reduce surface and underground water and may lead to drought and water scarcity in the long run, which may cause grave reduction in crop yields due to lack of water for crops (IPCC, 2018). Rising temperature may also affect livestock particularly growth and production patterns, increase heat stress and reduce animal products particularly meat and dairy (Kabubo-Mariara, 2008a, 2008b). There is also the possibility of a reduction in forage and water for livestock (Thornton et al., 2009). Thus, increasing temperature has the potential to retard the contribution of agriculture to poverty reduction, food security, livelihood and pro-poor economic development.

Rainfall across ecological zones in Ghana was found to be decreasing, which is consistent with existing studies (Kabo-Bah et al., 2016; Nkrumah et al., 2014), although Nyatuame et al. (2014) reported oscillatory pattern of rainfall across the Volta region of Ghana. Decreasing rainfall across ecological zones may pose serious threats to agricultural productivity thereby reducing income for smallholder farmers and their households, who depend largely on agriculture, as the main source of livelihood and food security. To offset the impacts of changing rainfall and temperature, particularly on agriculture, there is the need to encourage the use of drought resistant and early maturing crops. Livelihood, crop and livestock diversification can serve as important strategies to reduce climate change impact particularly in rural communities and households (Antwi-Agyei et al., 2014b, 2014a; Roy et al., 2018) Irrigation facilities must be provided particularly in hinterlands and rural areas to improve agricultural productivity. Policy makers must ensure the availability and provision of accurate and reliable early warning signs and information to farmers. This is because available research reveal that smallholder farmers in cocoa growing areas in Ghana have challenges in accessing reliable climate information needed particularly for their agricultural activities (Hirons et al., 2018). Extension and advisory services must also be intensified, particularly, in rural communities to enhance adaptation and adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers. Moreover, social intervention programmes that increase access to economic, social and technological assets to farmers, particularly, in rural communities must be intensified to enhance farmers’ adaptive capacity and reduce their vulnerability to climate change.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Peter Asare-Nuamah: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Ebo Botchway: Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

References

  1. Anderegg W.R.L., Prall J.W., Harold J., Schneider S.H. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010;107:12107–12109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antwi-Agyei P., Dougill A.J., Stringer L.C. Barriers to climate change adaptation : evidence from northeast Ghana in the context of a systematic literature review. Clim. Dev. 2014:37–41. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antwi-Agyei P., Stringer L.C., Dougill A.J. Livelihood adaptations to climate variability: insights from farming households in Ghana. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014;14:1615–1626. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnell N.W. Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2004;14:31–52. [Google Scholar]
  5. Asante F.A., Amuakwa-Mensah F. Climate change and variability in Ghana: stocktaking. Climate. 2015;3:78–99. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boansi D., Tambo J.A., Müller M. Analysis of farmers’ adaptation to weather extremes in West African Sudan Savanna. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2016:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Campion B.B., Venzke J.-F. Rainfall variability , floods and adaptations of the urban poor to flooding in Kumasi, Ghana. Nat. Hazards. 2013;65:1895–1911. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chepkoech W., Mungai N.W., Stöber S., Bett H.K., Lotze-campen H. Farmers’ perspectives: impact of climate change on African indigenous vegetable production in Kenya. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2018;10:551–579. [Google Scholar]
  9. Doran P.T., Zimmerman M.K. Reply to comments on “examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos (Washington. DC) 2009;90:233. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO . Building resilience for peace and food security; Rome: 2017. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghana Statisticial Service . Accra; Ghana: 2017. Provisional 2016 Annual Gross Domestic Product. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hirons M., Boyd E., McDermott C., Asare R., Morel A., Mason J., Malhi Y., Norris K. Understanding climate resilience in Ghanaian cocoa communities – advancing a biocultural perspective. J. Rural Stud. 2018;63:120–129. [Google Scholar]
  13. IPCC . Incheon; Korea: 2018. IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C - Summary for Policy Makers. [Google Scholar]
  14. IPCC . 2013. Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional. Fifth Assessment Report, Working Group I, Chapter 10. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]
  15. IPCC . Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, MA: 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Google Scholar]
  16. Issahaku A.-R., Campion B.B., Edziyie R. Rainfall and temperature changes and variability in Upper East region of Ghana. Earth Sp. Sci. 2016;3:284–294. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaiswal R.K., Lohani A.K., Tiwari H.L. Statistical analysis for change detection and trend assessment in climatological parameters. Environ. Process. 2015;2:729–749. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kabo-Bah A., Diji C., Nokoe K., Mulugetta Y., Obeng-Ofori D., Akpoti K. Multiyear rainfall and temperature trends in the Volta river basin and their potential impact on hydropower generation in Ghana. Climate. 2016;4:49. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kabubo-Mariara J. African Econ. Conf. Glob. Institutions Econ. Dev. Africa. Tunis, 12-14th Novemb. 2008. 2008. The economic impact of global warming on livestock husbandry in Kenya; a ricardian analysis. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kabubo-Mariara J. Climate change adaptation and livestock activity choices in Kenya: an economic analysis. Nat. Resour. Forum. 2008;32:131–141. [Google Scholar]
  21. Karmeshu N. Trend detection in annual temperature & precipitation using the Mann Kendall test – a case study to assess climate change on select states in the northeastern United States. Mausam. 2015;66:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kemausuor F., Akowuah J.O., Ofori E. Assessment of feedstock options for biofuels production in Ghana. J. Sustain. Bioenergy Syst. 2013;3:119–128. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lachin J.M. Fallacies of last observation carried forward analyses. Clin. Trials. 2016;13:161–168. doi: 10.1177/1740774515602688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li C., Filho W.L., Wang J., Yin J., Fedoruk M., Bao G., Bao Y., Yin S., Yu S., Hu R. An assessment of the impacts of climate extremes on the vegetation in Mongolian Plateau: using a scenarios-based analysis to support regional adaptation and mitigation options. Ecol. Indicat. 2018;95:805–814. [Google Scholar]
  25. Longobardi A., Villani P. Trend analysis of annual and seasonal rainfall time series in the Mediterranean area. Int. J. Climatol. 2010;30:1538–1546. [Google Scholar]
  26. MESTI . Accra; Ghana: 2013. Ghana National Climate Change Policy. [Google Scholar]
  27. MOFA . Accra; Ghana: 2016. Agriculture in Ghana Facts and Figures (2015) [Google Scholar]
  28. Nii Baah D.B. Changing rainfall patterns in Ghana : implication for small scale farming. J. Geogr. 2018;5:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nkrumah F., Klutse N.A.B., Adukpo D.C., Owusu K., Quagraine K.A., Owusu A., Gutowski W. Rainfall variability over Ghana: model versus rain gauge observation. Int. J. Geosci. 2014;5:673–683. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nyatuame M., Owusu-Gyimah V., Ampiaw F. Statistical analysis of rainfall trend for Volta region in Ghana. Int. J. Atmos. Sci. 2014;2014:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pallant J. sixth ed. McGraw-Hill Education; London, UK: 2016. SPSS Survival Manual - A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS Program. [Google Scholar]
  32. Roy J., Tschakert P., Waisman H., Abdul Halim S., Antwi-agyei P., Dasgupta P., Hayward B., Kanninen D., Liverman D., Okereke C., Pinho P.F., Riahi K., Suarez Rodriguez A.G. Sustainable development, poverty eradication and reducing inequalities. In: Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pörtner H.O., Roberts D., Skea J., Shukla P.R., Pirani A., Moufouma-Okia W., Péan C., Pidcock R., Maycock T., Connors S., Matthews R.B.R., Chen Y., Zhou X., Gomis M.I., S E.L., Tignor M., Waterfield T., editors. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change. IPCC; 2018. pp. 445–538. Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sissoko K., van Keulen H., Verhagen J., Tekken V., Battaglini A. Agriculture, livelihoods and climate change in the West african sahel. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2011;11:119–125. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thornton P.K., van de Steeg J., Notenbaert A., Herrero M. The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: a review of what we know and what we need to know. Agric. Syst. 2009;101:113–127. [Google Scholar]
  35. UNFCC . United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2011. Fact Sheet: Climate Change Science - the Status of Climate Change Science Today. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES