Skip to main content
Innovation in Aging logoLink to Innovation in Aging
. 2019 Nov 8;3(Suppl 1):S432. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz038.1617

ACTUARIAL CRITERIA FOR MCI DIAGNOSIS IN ACTIVE: IMPLICATIONS OF ADJUSTMENT FOR RACE

Kelsey Thomas 1, Sarah Cook 2, Fred Unverzagt 3, Mark W Bondi 4, Michael Marsiske 5
PMCID: PMC6840451

Abstract

This study examined the baseline prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the ACTIVE study using actuarial criteria for MCI. Participants (n=2763; 26% Black) were classified as probable MCI cases if they had two observed test scores within the same cognitive domain (memory, reasoning, speed) that were >1SD below a demographically-adjusted expected score (based on the regression weights of a “robust” normal control group). Each score was adjusted using two approaches: Method 1 adjusted for age, sex, and education; Method 2 also adjusted for race. The estimated prevalence of MCI was 33.5% (n=925) in Method 1 and 32.1% (n=887) in Method 2. Adjusting for race reduced the proportion of Black participants classified as probable MCI from 42.3% to 34.9%. Future work will examine whether adjustment for social determinants of health (e.g., education quality, neighborhood/healthcare access) might further improve the utility of this classification method in diverse samples.


Articles from Innovation in Aging are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES