Abstract
Proteolytic enzymes are of great interest for biotechnological purposes, and their large-scale production, as well as the discovery of strains producing new molecules, is a relevant issue. Collagenases are employed for biomedical and pharmaceutical purposes. The high specificity of collagenase-based preparations toward the substrate strongly relies on the enzyme purity. However, the overall activity may depend on the cooperation with other proteases, the presence of which may be essential for the overall enzymatic activity, but potentially harmful for cells and tissues. Vibrios produce some of the most promising bacterial proteases (including collagenases), and their exo-proteome includes several enzymes with different substrate specificities, the production and relative abundances of which strongly depend on growth conditions. We evaluated the effects of different media compositions on the proteolytic exo-proteome of Vibrio alginolyticus and its closely relative Vibrio parahaemolyticus, in order to improve the overall proteases production, as well as the yield of the desired enzymes subset. Substantial biological responses were achieved with all media, which allowed defining culture conditions for targeted improvement of selected enzyme classes, besides giving insights in possible regulatory mechanisms. In particular, we focused our efforts on collagenases production, because of the growing biotechnological interest due to their pharmaceutical/biomedical applications.
Keywords: V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, proteolytic secretome, collagenase, proteases production
1. Introduction
Proteolytic enzymes, including those of microbial origin, are employed in several fields, ranging from food manufacturing/processing, to the enzymatic treatment of various wastes for the production of highly valuable by-products, as well as biomedical-pharmaceutical applications. In this scenario, enzymes showing high tolerance to various harsh or particular conditions (pH, temperature, salt content, etc.) are required for industrial and biomedical applications. Such features are expected for enzymes from bacteria thriving in extreme/unique environments, where studies focused on bacterial assemblage and metabolism [1,2] and references therein, would deserve further efforts aiming to the identification of possibly attracting enzymes. However, such abilities are found in many marine enzymes (even from not extremophiles bacteria), as well, which are often considered among the most valuable biocatalists for a wide range of uses, including industrial and biomedical applications [3,4,5,6].
Members of genus Vibrio are among the most promising, well recognized as proteases-producing bacteria, worthy to be further considered and explored as source of enzymes and other biomolecules [7].
Many proteolytic enzymes are secreted, and their production is directed to the transformation of high molecular weight polypeptides into shorter chains, for an easier uptake and utilization, but they may act as virulence factors in pathogenic bacteria. Such enzymes are of high interest for biotechnological applications [7,8,9]; in particular, proteases from marine organisms are particularly attractive and promising for biomedical and experimental sciences such as tissue dissociation and cell isolation for transplantation/cell-therapy purposes [9,10].
Among proteases from Vibrio spp. (one of the main proteases-producing bacteria), collagenases have attracted interest for a long time, and some of them are routinely used for biomedical and pharmaceutical uses.
Vibrio collagenases are zinc metalloproteinases classified into subfamily M9A in the MEROPS database [11]. Collagenases belong to a family of zinc-dependent metalloproteinases that degrade collagen substrates, and they are naturally produced by most animals and by many bacteria.
The main advantage of bacterial collagenases relies on their ability to carry out the selective removal of necrotic tissue [12,13] with only minor involvement of the neighboring healthy tissues [14,15]. Therefore, they have been successfully applied in the treatment of many pathological conditions [16] including third-degree burns [17,18], ulcers [19,20,21], ischemic arterial ulcers [22,23] and Dupuytren’s disease [24]. More recently, collagenases have been approved by both the FDA and the European Union to be used as nonsurgical treatment for Peyronie’s disease. Moreover, collagenases have been used in laboratory procedures involving tissues dissociation and cells isolation [9,25,26,27,28,29].
Overall, these features and range of application make collagenases precious supporters for a variety of situations.
The secreted collagenase from V. alginolyticus is being successfully applied for pharmaceutical uses [30] and references therein] that exhibits limited non-specific proteolytic activity, which reduces side effects due to digestion of healthy tissues [31]. Therefore, such enzyme, which is industrially produced by autologous expression, has proven to be useful and effective as debriding agent for medical uses (i.e., ointments and other devices).
Vibrio alginolyticus is a halophilic Gram-negative γ-proteobacterium mainly occurring in warm marine and estuarine environments. It is a pathogen, sometimes opportunistic, for both humans (causing mainly wound infections) and sea animals [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
The pathogenesis mechanism of V. alginolyticus has not been fully understood, but several virulence factors including, among others, secreted proteases, collagenases and siderophores, have been described [40,41,42,43,44,45,46], which supports the idea that, similarly to other pathogenic bacteria (like V. vulnificus), such a microorganism could take advantage of proteases, as well as iron availability, for effective host attack and bacterial dissemination through digestion of the tissues’ protein components [45,46,47,48,49].
V. parahaemolyticus is very closely related to V. alginolyticus and, similarly to the latter, in recent years is becoming the leading foodborne pathogen responsible for food poisoning and acute gastroenteritis [50,51,52,53,54,55,56]; it also causes wound-infection through exposure of a new wound to contaminated seawater or estuarine water [10]. In V. parahaemolyticus, the collagenase VppC has been also described [57]
The production of collagenase in V. alginolyticus is known to be regulated by multiple factors, including collagen and its high molecular weight fragments, as well as peptides, quorum sensing temperature and oxygen [58,59,60,61,62], whereas the factors regulating collagenases production in V. parahaemolyticus are not well established.
Besides collagenases, the secreted proteolytic proteome of both Vibrio strains includes various enzymes with possible biotechnological applications.
With the aim of identifying cultural conditions that could improve either the overall proteases production or that of specific enzymes, namely collagenases and/or other proteases, we tested ten different culture media, so as to seek for the best cultural conditions to be set for maximum yield of target enzymes.
The rationale was based, for many assayed conditions, on the knowledge of the factors known as supportive for collagenase induction, as well as on our preliminary observations in closely related bacteria for the production of various secreted proteases. We reasoned that both V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus are pathogenic bacteria, which benefit of secreted proteases for host invasion, and that the production of such enzymes might be expected to be enhanced by factors mimicking the host environment. Moreover, we wondered if the production of secreted proteases, including collagenases, could be enhanced by factors well known to be involved in the virulence of many pathogens. It is worth noting that published studies are focused on collagenase expression (the main enzyme of interest due to its biomedical/pharmaceutical uses), while little or no information is available about the overall proteolytic proteome modulation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Microbiological Methods
2.1.1. Culture Media and Conditions
Marine Broth (MB, Laboratorios CONDA, Spain) and Marine Agar (MB containing 1.5% Agar) were used for strains maintenance and routine cultivation, as well for intermediate inoculum.
MB was used as base medium for subsequent modifications, consisting of dilution 1:5 in sterile seawater (for MB 0.2×), or in the addition of 1% Gelatine, Type B, from bovine skin (SigmaAldrich, Milan, Italy) (MB+Gel), Casaminoacids 5 g/L (Sigma) (MB+AA), Yeast Extract (Conda, Madrid, Spain) 9 g/L (MB+YE), Peptone (Sigma) 9 g/L (MB+Pept), Glucose 4 g/L (MB+Glc), 0.5% Glycerol (MB+Gly), Meat Extract (Sigma) 10 g/L (MB+ME), FeCl2.EDTA 10 µM (MB+Fe).
Type strains were inoculated from single colonies, grown onto Marine Agar, in MB and let to grow overnight at 28 °C in an orbital shaker. The resulting liquid cultures were used to inoculate the aforementioned media by dilution of 1:1000.
Cultures were grown for 18 h at 28 °C in an orbital shaker for proper aeration (220 rpm), then OD600 was measured for each culture and the cells harvested by centrifugation (10 min at 8000× g at 4 °C) after chilling on ice for 10 min.
The resulting cell-free medium was used for biochemical assays. Data refer to at least three independent replicates. Error bars in the graphs represent 1 standard deviation.
2.1.2. Type Strains
Vibrio type strains were from DSMZ (Germany), and in particular V. parahaemolyticus (DSM10027) and V. alginolyticus (DSM2171).
2.2. SDS Electrophoresis and Zymography
Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was carried out as described by Laemmly. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained with 0.25% Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250. The molecular weight of the enzyme was estimated using a molecular weight markers. Zymography was performed on substrate supplemented-PAGE. After electrophoresis, gelatine zymographies were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in two developing buffers: Activator buffer containing 2 mmol/L CaCl2, Tris-HCl buffer (50 mmol/L; pH 7.4), containing 1.5% Triton X-100 and 0.02% Na Azide and Inhibitor buffer Tris-HCl buffer (50 mmol/L; pH 7.4), containing 1.5% Triton X-100 and 0.02% Na Azide plus 2 mmol/L EDTA to inhibit any gelatinase activity. After incubation, gels were stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250.
2.3. Substrate Specific Activity Determination
Total protease activity was measured by azocasein assay according to the protocol [63] with some modification. The principle of this assay is the hydrolysis of azocasein by proteases resulting in release of azo-molecule with absorption at 450 nm. The assay was carried out by incubating 50 µL of supernatant with 200 μL of 1% azocasein in 0.2 M Glycine-NaOH (pH 7.5) at 37 °C for 4 h. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 300 μL of 5% trichloroacetic acid. The assay mixture was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min, then an equal volume of 1.0 N NaOH was added to the supernatant and absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Calibration curve was made according to Reference [64].
The collagenolytic activity was measured following the procedure described in Reference [65] using a modification of the collagen digestion method, in which the enzymes were incubated for 5 h with native bovine Achilles tendon collagen (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C. The collagen digestion was determined using the colorimetric ninhydrin process [66]. The amino acids released are expressed as micromoles leucine per milligram dry weight of enzyme. One unit equals one micromole of leucine equivalents released from collagen in 5 h at 37 °C, pH 7.5, under the specified conditions [8]. Enzymatic activities were calculated considering the values obtained from each sample both in presence and in absence of substrate (the latter was subtracted, so as to avoid any contribution of culture medium components).
2.4. Sequence and Structural Analyses of Collagenases
Functional sites and domains in the predicted amino acid sequences were predicted using the InterProScan software [67] the Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) program, the Pfam database [68] and the PROSITE program [69] MSA were constructed using T-Coffee (Tree-based Consistency Objective Function For alignment Evaluation). The 3D structures were reconstructed by homology modelling via the Protein Homology/analogY Recognition Engine 2.0 (Phyre 2) software [70] using the intensive modelling model. Candidate structures for homology modelling were selected according to pairwise alignment. At least two different structures were used as a template for each generated structure as reported elsewhere [71,72,73,74,75] and homology models were built for all the sets of proteins.
Additionally, the evolutionary variability of amino acids onto the reconstructed structures were computed using ConSurf webserver [76] and rendered using the UCSF Chimera package.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Culture Media and Growth Performances
Marine Broth (MB) was chosen as standard/reference medium, because of its well-recognized effectiveness in supporting the growth of marine vibrios. Moreover, its composition makes it suitable for large scale production, where its synthetic salty component may be replaced by seawater. Finally, its recipes include peptone, which has been reported as collagenase inducer in V. alginolyticus [59]. Therefore, we decided to test various modification of such a culture medium, seeking for compositions able to enhance enzymes production. Moreover, a diluted MB was tested, as well.
Both V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus were challenged with all cultural media, and the growth performances, as well as the production of secreted proteases were compared.
Almost all formulations supported a good bacterial growth, with a nearly overlapping trend (except for some differences) for both Vibrio strains (see Figure 1).
In particular, the 0.2× dilution of MB resulted in severely reduced growth, as expected; the addition of gelatine (from mammalian skin), as well as of glycerol, iron and meat extract, resulted in some growth reduction for V. alginolyticus; minor growth reduction was recorded in glucose, peptone or yeast extract supplemented media. Only the supplementation with casamino acids (mostly consisting of free amino acids from casein hydrolysate) resulted in a growth enhancement.
V. parahaemolyticus responded in a similar way to various conditions, with an overall growth reduction compared to MB; glycerol had stronger effects, compared to V. alginolyticus, while a slight growth improvement was observed in presence of glucose.
As general rule, the growth and metabolic efficiency of non-oligotrophic bacteria is positively modulated by nutrients concentration and availability, although growth efficiency and enzyme production are not necessarily related (see Section 3.4). In particular, carbon/nitrogen sources as protein and or cell hydrolysates (i.e., peptones, casaminoacids, yeast extract, meat extract, etc.) are well known for their stimulating activity on bacterial growth.
Besides their ability to increase the overall nitrogen/carbon sources concentration, they greatly differ not only in compositions, but also for the ease of nutrients uptake which, in turn, results in a different “available nutrients concentration” the cells are exposed to over time.
Peptone and casamino-acids are pure source of amino acids, consisting of peptides from protein enzymatic digestion and casein acid hydrolysate (i.e., mainly free amino acids and very short peptides) respectively, the latter being fully available immediately. Whereas, yeast extract (from yeast autolysate) and meat extract contain, besides peptides and amino acids, a complex mixture of low molecular weight nutrients ranging from nucleotides to trace elements (including iron, especially for meat extract). In fact, meat extract is manufactured from meat (with low fat and sinew content) and can be considered as complementing the nutritive properties of peptone by contributing minerals, phosphates, energy sources and those essential factors missing in peptone.
Since the possibility cannot be excluded that some of these—even minor—components could mimic the infected tissues microenvironment (which might stimulate virulence, as well as productions of secreted factors including degradative enzymes, even if an opposite effect might be hypothesized as hydrolysis products, as well), possible positive effects not only on the growth, but first all on enzymes production may be reasonably expected.
Most of the aforementioned recipes are widely used, even in high concentrations, in several fermentation culture media, including those recommended for production of recombinant proteins, where extra nutrients and energy sources (i.e., glucose and glycerol) are recognized as beneficial in supporting the growth and the protein synthesis overload. However, most of such knowledge has arisen from production of recombinant proteins, which is usually not affected by other global regulatory mechanisms. In contrast, the response to cultural conditions at the level of gene expression and proteins production in autologous systems is not so obvious or predictable, and it was the focus of the following experiments.
3.2. Collagenase Production
Collagenases are probably the most valuable enzymes occurring in Vibrio secretome. In order to assess their actual production, the overall collagenolytic activity was measured in supernatants from each culture.
In particular, the degradative activity was assessed using insoluble collagen from bovine tendon as substrate, instead of a synthetic [77] one. In fact, while the latter is recognized to dramatically increase the specificity for collagenases, it does not provide information about the enzyme activity toward natural substrates, because it selects for enzymes able to recognize the specific amino-acidic sequence in denaturated collagen. In contrast, measuring the digestion of a native substrate is the test of choice to assess the actual effectiveness of proteases in digesting native collagen, being the latter a quite peculiar substrate, difficult to be hydrolysed because of its structure and accessibility of cleavage sites [78]. Results showed a variety of responses to different culture conditions, and significant differences between the two strains (see Figure 2A).
In particular, V. alginolyticus collagenase production was strongly reduced in low nutrients conditions (MB 0.2×), in presence of glycerol and, at lower extent, in the iron-supplemented medium; little variations were observed in other media, except for the gelatine-based one, which was confirmed [58] to improve the collagenolytic activity.
Instead, a very different behaviour was observed in V. parahaemolyticus, where an overall improvement of collagenase production was observed in all culture media, except for MB 0.2× and MB supplemented with glycerol (where, similarly to V. alginolyticus, a clear reduction of collagenase activity occurred). Such enhancements became dramatic, ranging from two to three folds, in presence of either gelatine or glucose, as well as in media supplemented with either iron or meat extract.
Further interesting insights into the physiological response to the tested conditions could be gained considering the production normalized per cell density (Figure 2B–D). The normalization of collagenase activity with cell concentration clearly shows that the enzyme production in V. alginolyticus is hampered by all medium modification, except for supplementation with meat extract (which resulted in about 40% induction) and, negligibly, yeast extract. Instead, gelatine proven to be the only strong inducer of collagenase production, and had the same positive effects on V. parahaemolyticus, as well.
The latter species showed a very different response pattern (compared to V. alginolyticus), nearly overlapping with that of the overall measured activity values in the medium, where most supplementations showed positive effects; however, the strongest collagenase induction was achieved in presence of either gelatine or iron (in contrast, the latter was ineffective in V. alginolyticus).
Results obtained in V. parahaemolyticus showed a high responsiveness of this bacterium to various supplementations in terms of collagenase production, which were more strongly enhanced by gelatine, meat extract, glucose and iron. The possibility that such compounds could affect the enzymatic activity, either directly (through enzyme modulation) or indirectly (by stimulating the production of modulator factors) is unlikely, as none of such mechanisms have been described for Vibrio enzymes, to date; this prompted us to consider any enzymatic activity variation as ascribable to differences in enzyme production.
The knowledge that culture media containing animal derivatives (like gelatine or meat extract) raises concerns for human health when products are intended for biomedical/human uses, prompted us to investigate conditions that could further improve collagenase production without the addition of gelatine as inducer.
In particular, we wondered if the combination of iron and glucose could exert additive effects in V. parahaemolyticus collagenase induction, compared with their use as single supplement.
Actually, combining the two inducers exerted a strong effect in terms of production per cell (induction), whose increase exceeded about 70% and 80% compared with gelatine and MB, respectively (Figure 3A). However, the overall yield could not exceed that obtained with gelatine alone, because of the much higher cell growth obtained in the latter condition. (Figure 3B).
Further efforts, consisting of various combination of media composition with cultural strategies (including fed-batch), could reasonably result in further improvements in the overall enzyme yield and a best “matching” between overall and “per cell” collagenase production.
It is noteworthy that the addition of glycerol to the growth media, even in presence of inducers, seems to “turn off” the enzyme production. Such response was rather unexpected and would deserve further investigations aiming to explain how this small, easily metabolizable molecule, could exert such a strong effect, presumably at transcriptional level and/or, less likely, affecting the secretion. Moreover, the possibility that glycerol could induce an overall reprogramming at the gene expression level (i.e., affecting processes ranging from transcription to RNA metabolism, to translation and downstream steps), possibly responsible for the observed impaired cell growth (see Figure 1), should be considered and investigated.
In this regard, it must be noted that the expression of V. alginolyticus collagenase undergoes some long-term regulation, as its production shows some rifampicin-insensitivity [59], which let us hypothesize an extremely long mRNA half-life (of at least 60 min, based on data reported in Reference [59]), rather than a rifampicin-resistant transcription. If confirmed, this implies that any modulation at transcriptional level exerts its effects over a long time (this might be exploited for enzyme production when using metabolizable inducers, the effects of which have to be expected to extend for a long time after their depletion).
Accordingly with the aforementioned possible mechanisms, the simulation of the V. alginolyticus colA 5’-UTR mRNA folding showed similarities with E. coli ompA 5’-UTR [79,80], one of the best characterized models for bacterial long-lived mRNAs, the stability of which has been reported to be affected, among other factors, by glucose [81].
Taken together, such elements encourage further investigations aiming to better understand such mechanisms.
3.3. Structural Analysis of Collagenases from V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus
Keeping in mind the recognized high closeness of the two Vibrio species, in order to get insights into the overall similarity and structural relationships between their collagenases, bioinformatic analyses were performed. In fact, depending on the degree of relativeness between enzymes already approved for practical uses and others, overlapping features might be hypothesized, thus supporting further efforts aiming to evaluate the possibility of actual use of new enzymes (namely, collagenase from V. parahaemolyticus) for similar applications.
V. alginolyticus produces a collagenase secreted as a 82 kDa protein (VAC) which show the typical domain organization of class III enzyme of M9A subfamily (Figure 4A,B). It is synthesised as inactive precursor with a putative tripartite N-terminal signal peptide (residues 1–21), required for translocation across the inner membrane. VAC possesses a cleavage site for proteolytic activation located between position 21 and 22 and a catalytic domain (residues 78–600) including a canonical zinc-binding motif (H477EYVH481). A PKD (Polycystic Kidney Disease) domain (residues 609–697), consisting of a beta-sandwich of seven or more strands in two sheets with a Greek-key topology, was also found together with a prepeptidase (PPC) domain (residues 735–796) at the C-terminal of VAC.
V. parahaemolyticus produces two 90 kDa proteins belonging to class III collagenases, VppC and VPM, which are synthetized as inactive precursors with the canonical tripartite signal peptide for translocation (residues 1–21) followed by a proteolytic activating cleavage site located between residues Ala21 and Met22. Similarly to the homolog from V. alginolyticus, both VppC and VPM show the two domains organization with the catalytic domains (residues 78–600 in each proteins), harbouring the motif H477EYVH481 responsible for Zn2+ coordination, followed by the PKD (residues 609–697) and the PPC domains at their corresponding carboxyl terminus.
Additionally, V. parahaemolyticus also produce class II protease named PrtVp possessing the catalytic domain with a zinc-binding motif (HEYTH) lacking any C-terminal domain.
Similarity in domains organization was also shown in terms of evolutionary relationship after sequence comparisons via multiple sequence alignment (MSA). Such alignment resulted in 656 conserved sites, 158 variable residues over 815 amino acidic residues and in absence of parsimony informative substitutions. Moreover, MSA analysis of collagenases secreted by V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus showed that VppC and VPM shared identity higher than 80% with VAC collagenase from V. alginolyticus.
An effort was also made to identify similarities of protein folds. Toward this end, the 3D structure of these collagenase was predicted by homology modelling (Figure 5A) and the results highlight the typical saddle shape configuration with a two-domain structure organized in the collagenase catalytic domain and the accessory domain containing PKD-like and PPC motifs of these enzyme. Moreover, conservation analysis among members of the collagenase class III family from V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus confirmed the high degree of conservation among these enzymes (Figure 5B).
In light of the results obtained from experiments with the two Vibrio strains, including the high responsivity of V. parahaemolyticus and its enzyme production performances, which greatly exceeded those of V. alginolyticus in many conditions, as well as the high similarity of the considered collagenases, as highlighted by the structure computational comparison, we wonder if the use of V. parahaemolyticus collagenase could be conceivable, instead of that from V. alginolyticus.
3.4. Other Secreted Proteases
Given the various potential applications of proteolytic enzymes, ranging from wastes processing to biomedical/pharmaceutical uses [82], the overall exo-protease production was assessed and measured as caseinolytic activity in supernatants from each culture.
The proteases production showed differentiated responses to the various conditions the two strains were challenged with.
In V. alginolyticus, all tested supplementations except glucose (which did not induce detectable responses) resulted in reduced proteases production (Figure 6A). The strongest variations were observed for glycerol as well as for all hydrolysates but meat extract. Overall, these results supported the hypothesis that nutrient concentration is highly supportive for the growth (see Figure 1), but their availability results in repressive effects on proteases production.
Such a concept was further confirmed and strengthened by induction data (production per cell) (Figure 6B), which highlighted that the maximum repressive effect is achieved by casaminoacids (the easiest to be uptaken) supplementation, followed by peptone and yeast extract, whereas the addition of meat extract resulted in some induction (as observed with iron, as well), probably because of the “host mimicking effect”.
Noteworthy, the maximum proteases induction was achieved in MB 0.2×, where nutrients were five folds diluted compared with the standard medium, and where they are expected to be consumed in the early stages of the growth (note that the lowest overall growth was achieved in this medium (Figure 1)). As this means that cells grew in nutrient-limiting conditions, and then starved for a long time while producing comparable enzymes amount than in MB, it might be argued that starvation strongly stimulates enzymes production. Accordingly, nutrients availability exerts opposite effects, instead.
Similarly to what was observed for collagenase, V. parahaemolyticus showed a different behaviour in response to various conditions.
As for the overall proteases production, a sharp reduction was observed only in presence of yeast extract and glycerol, whereas negligible variations or a slight increase were obtained in other media (Figure 6A). As for production per cell, meat extract resulted in repression, while little effects were recorded in all other media except for diluted MB, where the induction was much stronger than that observed in V. alginolyticus (Figure 6B).
In order to get more comprehensive information about the pattern of secreted proteases in both V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus, as well as about the overall presence of metalloproteases, zimographic analyses were carried out. Gelatine was used as substrate so as to detect proteases, including collagenases, as well.
V. alginolyticus showed nearly the same proteases patterns in all media tested, with a few additional minor bands, corresponding to low molecular weight enzymes in presence of MB 0.2×, gelatine, glucose, yeast extract and meat extract, respectively (Figure 7A).
It is noteworthy that the only exception was observed in presence of glycerol, which resulted in a severely altered pattern, where all bands observed in other conditions disappeared, being replaced by high molecular weight ones, the highest of which yielded signals at about 100 and 200 KDa, respectively.
Interestingly, some faint digestion signals corresponding to about 200 KDa enzymes were observed in all samples; however, the signal corresponding to the highest and more intense one observed in presence of glycerol was increased in presence of iron. Similarly, casaminoacids and glucose supplementation resulted, although at much lesser extent, in the appearance of the same bands.
Secreted proteases harbouring such apparent molecular weights have never been observed or reported in such vibrios and, to our knowledge, genomic sequences lack ORF encoding such long proteases, so that they might be worthy of further investigations, even if we cannot exclude that they could be aggregates (as the fractionation was carried out in non-reducing conditions).
A more variegated scenario was observed in V. parahaemolyticus, the gelatinolytic pattern of which showed more evident differences between various media (Figure 7C). In particular, the addition of gelatine, as well as of yeast extracts, peptone and meat extract, resulted in a more complex pattern, characterized by the presence of bands in the range above 60 KDa.
In V. parahaemolyticus, the growth in presence of glycerol resulted in much more severe effects, as any proteolytic activity nearly disappeared, and only a single, very faint band (of about 70 KDa) was still clearly visible in the pattern below 100 KDa.
A similar reduction was observed in the highest molecular weight band, of about 220 KDa. In fact, in V. parahaemolyticus digestion bands (only one per lane), different among various conditions, were clearly visible in the range of about 170–220 KDa. Their presence, similarly to what discussed for V. alginolyticus, was unexpected and not previously reported, so that further investigations would be needed in order to better characterize them.
Inhibition tests in presence of EDTA (Figure 7B,D) showed that most of the bands observed in both strains, including the highest ones, correspond to metalloproteases.
4. Conclusions
Overall, data reported herein highlight the possibility of improving the enzymes production in autologous systems, although in most cases recombinant production offers undisputed advantages, including the possibility of improved cloning and expression in standard microbial factories like E. coli [83], as well as the production from toxin-free organisms through improved expression systems [82].
A modified medium, for improved collagenases production in V. parahaemolyticus, was reported, where the combined supplementation of two non-animal inducers (namely, iron and glucose) has proven to be beneficial. Similarly, starvation (i.e., growth in low nutrient concentration medium) was shown to enhance proteases production in V. alginolyticus.
Moreover, the possibility of expanding the repertoire of available collagenases for biomedical applications is proposed, supported by bioinformatics data and technological considerations, as well.
Furthermore, the results elicited intriguing insights into regulatory mechanisms, worthy of further studies involving multiple levels, ranging from transcriptional to post-transcriptional regulation, including mRNAs metabolism, as well as protein synthesis and secretion.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.S.; M.T., A.N.; methodology, M.S.; M.T., A.N.; investigation M.S.; M.T., A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T., A.N.; software A.N.; funding acquisition and resources G.G.
Funding
This research was funded by H2020, Future Formulations: Developing Future Pharmaceuticals Through Advanced Analysis and Intersectoral Exchange (FutForm), Project n. 691128.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Gagliano A.L., D’Alessandro W., Tagliavia M., Parello F., Quatrini P. Methanotrophic activity and diversity of methanotrophs in volcanic geothermal soils at Pantelleria (Italy) Biogeosciences. 2014;11:5865–5875. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-5865-2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gagliano A.L., Tagliavia M., D’Alessandro W., Franzetti A., Parello F., Quatrini P. So close, so different: Geothermal flux shapes divergent soil microbial communities at neighbouring sites. Geobiology. 2016;14:150–162. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Burton S.G., Cowan D.A., Woodley J.M. The search for the ideal biocatalyst. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002;20:37–45. doi: 10.1038/nbt0102-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ferrer M., Martínez-Abarca F., Golyshin P.N. Mining genomes and “metagenomes” for novel catalysts. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005;16:588–593. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Trincone A. Marine Biocatalysts: Enzymatic Features and Applications. Mar. Drugs. 2011;9:478–499. doi: 10.3390/md9040478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dionisi H.M., Lozada M., Olivera N.L. Bioprospection of marine microorganisms: Biotechnological applications and methods. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2012;44:49–60. doi: 10.1590/S0325-75412012000100010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tagliavia M., Nicosia A. Advanced Strategies for Food-Grade Protein Production: A New E. coli/Lactic Acid Bacteria Shuttle Vector for Improved Cloning and Food-Grade Expression. Microorganisms. 2019;7:116. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7050116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Salamone M., Nicosia A., Bennici C., Quatrini P., Catania V., Mazzola S., Ghersi G., Cuttitta A. Comprehensive Analysis of a Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strain Extracellular Serine Protease VpSP37. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brandhorst D., Brandhorst H., Johnson P.R.V. Enzyme Development for Human Islet Isolation: Five Decades of Progress or Stagnation? Rev. Diabet. Stud. 2017;14:22–38. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2017.14.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miyoshi S.-I. Extracellular proteolytic enzymes produced by human pathogenic vibrio species. Front. Microbiol. 2013;4:339. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rawlings N.D., Barrett A.J., Finn R. Twenty years of the MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D343–D350. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Westerhof W., Vanscheidt W., editors. Proteolytic Enzymes and Wound Healing. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nano M., Ricci E., De Simone M., Lanfranco G. Collagenase Therapy in the Treatment of Decubitus Ulcers. In: Abatangelo G., Donati L., Vanscheidt W., editors. Proteolysis in Wound Repair. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1996. pp. 61–69. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Helaly P., Vogt E., Schneider G. Wound healing disorders and their enzymatic therapy—A multicenter double-blind study. Schweiz. Rundsch. Med. Prax. 1988;77:1428–1434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Riley K.N., Herman I.M. Collagenase Promotes the Cellular Responses to Injury and Wound Healing In Vivo. J. Burns Wounds. 2005;4:e8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y.-Z., Ran L.-Y., Li C.-Y., Chen X.-L. Diversity, Structures, and Collagen-Degrading Mechanisms of Bacterial Collagenolytic Proteases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:6098–6107. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00883-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vrabec R., Moserová J., Konícková Z., Bĕhounková E., Bláha J. Clinical experience with enzymatic debridement of burned skin with the use of collagenase. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol. 1974;18:496–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hansbrough J.F., Achauer B., Dawson J., Himel H., Luterman A., Slater H., Levenson S., Salzberg C.A., Hansbrough W.B., Doré C. Wound healing in partial-thickness burn wounds treated with collagenase ointment versus silver sulfadiazine cream. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16:241–247. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199505000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vetra H., Whittaker D. Hydrotherapy and topical collagenase for decubitus ulcers. Geriatrics. 1975;30:53–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rao D.B., Sane P.G., Georgiev E.L. Collagenase in the treatment of dermal and decubitus ulcers. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1975;23:22–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Altman M., Goldstein L., Horowitz S. Collagenase: An adjunct to healing trophic ulcerations in the diabetic patient. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 1978;68:11–15. doi: 10.7547/87507315-68-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boxer A.M., Gottesman N., Bernstein H., Mandl I. Debridement of dermal ulcers and decubiti with collagenase. Geriatrics. 1969;24:75–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Záruba F., Lettl A., Brozková L., Skrdlantová H., Krs V. Collagenase in the treatment of ulcers in dermatology. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol. 1974;18:499–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Badalamente M.A., Hurst L.C. Enzyme injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease. J. Hand Surg. Am. 2000;25:629–636. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.6918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Suggs W., Van Wart H., Sharefkin J.B. Enzymatic harvesting of adult human saphenous vein endothelial cells: Use of a chemically defined combination of two purified enzymes to attain viable cell yields equal to those attained by crude bacterial collagenase preparations. J. Vasc. Surg. 1992;15:205–213. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(92)70029-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wolters G.H.J., Vos-Scheperkeuter G.H., Lin H.-C., van Schilfgaarde R. Different Roles of Class I and Class II Clostridium Histolyticum Collagenase in Rat Pancreatic Islet Isolation. Diabetes. 1995;44:227–233. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.2.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brandhorst H., Raemsch-Guenther N., Raemsch C., Friedrich O., Huettler S., Kurfuerst M., Korsgren O., Brandhorst D. The ratio between collagenase class I and class II influences the efficient islet release from the rat pancreas. Transplantation. 2008;85:456–461. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816050c8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Salamone M., Seidita G., Cuttitta A., Rigogliuso S., Mazzola S., Bertuzzi F., Ghersi G. A New Method to Value Efficiency of Enzyme Blends for Pancreatic Tissue Digestion. Transplant. Proc. 2010;42:2043–2048. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Salamone M., Cuttitta A., Bertuzzi F., Ricordi C., Ghersi G., Seidita G. Biochemical comparison between Clostridium hystoliticum collagenases G and H obtained by DNA recombinant and extractive procedures. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2012;27:259–264. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bassetto F., Maschio N., Abatangelo G., Zavan B., Scarpa C., Vindigni V. Collagenase From Vibrio alginolyticus Cultures: Experimental Study and Clinical Perspectives. Surg. Innov. 2016;23:557–562. doi: 10.1177/1553350616660630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Di Pasquale R., Vaccaro S., Caputo M., Cuppari C., Caruso S., Catania A., Messina L. Collagenase-assisted wound bed preparation: An in vitro comparison between Vibrio alginolyticus and Clostridium histolyticum collagenases on substrate specificity. Int. Wound J. 2019;16:1013–1023. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee K.K., Yu S.R., Yang T.I., Liu P.C., Chen F.R. Isolation and characterization of Vibrio alginolyticus isolated from diseased kuruma prawn, Penaeus japonicus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1996;22:111–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1996.tb01121.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Balebona M.C., Andreu M.J., Bordas M.A., Zorrilla I., Moriñigo M.A., Borrego J.J. Pathogenicity of Vibrio alginolyticus for Cultured Gilt-Head Sea Bream (Sparus aurata L.) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998;64:4269–4275. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.11.4269-4275.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu P.C., Chen Y.C., Lee K.K. Pathogenicity of Vibrio alginolyticus isolated from diseased small abalone Haliotis diversicolor supertexta. Microbios. 2001;104:71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Austin B. Vibrios as causal agents of zoonoses. Vet. Microbiol. 2010;140:310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reilly G.D., Reilly C.A., Smith E.G., Baker-Austin C. Vibrio alginolyticus-associated wound infection acquired in British waters, Guernsey, July 2011. Eurosurveillance. 2011;16:19994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Newton A., Kendall M., Vugia D.J., Henao O.L., Mahon B.E. Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996-2010: Review of surveillance data from 2 systems. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012;54(Suppl. 5):S391–S395. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Frost M., Baxter J., Buckley P., Dye S., Stoker B. Reporting marine climate change impacts: Lessons from the science-policy interface. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2017;78:114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jacobs Slifka K.M., Newton A.E., Mahon B.E. Vibrio alginolyticus infections in the USA, 1988-2012. Epidemiol. Infect. 2017;145:1491–1499. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cai S.H., Wu Z.H., Jian J.C., Lu Y.S. Cloning and expression of gene encoding the thermostable direct hemolysin from Vibrio alginolyticus strain HY9901, the causative agent of vibriosis of crimson snapper (Lutjanus erythopterus) J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007;103:289–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03250.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang Q., Liu Q., Cao X., Yang M., Zhang Y. Characterization of two TonB systems in marine fish pathogen Vibrio alginolyticus: Their roles in iron utilization and virulence. Arch. Microbiol. 2008;190:595–603. doi: 10.1007/s00203-008-0407-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rui H., Liu Q., Wang Q., Ma Y., Liu H., Shi C., Zhang Y. Role of alkaline serine protease, asp, in Vibrio alginolyticus virulence and regulation of its expression by luxO-luxR regulatory system. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009;19:431–438. doi: 10.4014/jmb.0807.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jia A., Woo N.Y.S., Zhang X.-H. Expression, purification, and characterization of thermolabile hemolysin (TLH) from Vibrio alginolyticus. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2010;90:121–127. doi: 10.3354/dao02225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhao Z., Chen C., Hu C.-Q., Ren C.-H., Zhao J.-J., Zhang L.-P., Jiang X., Luo P., Wang Q.-B. The type III secretion system of Vibrio alginolyticus induces rapid apoptosis, cell rounding and osmotic lysis of fish cells. Microbiology. 2010;156:2864–2872. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.040626-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fukushima J., Takeuchi H., Tanaka E., Hamajima K., Sato Y., Kawamoto S., Morihara K., Keil B., Okuda K. Molecular cloning and partial DNA sequencing of the collagenase gene of Vibrio alginolyticus. Microbiol. Immunol. 1990;34:977–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1990.tb01519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Takeuchi H., Shibano Y., Morihara K., Fukushima J., Inami S., Keil B., Gilles A.M., Kawamoto S., Okuda K. Structural gene and complete amino acid sequence of Vibrio alginolyticus collagenase. Biochem. J. 1992;281:703–708. doi: 10.1042/bj2810703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Miyoshi N., Shimizu C., Miyoshi S., Shinoda S. Purification and characterization of Vibrio vulnificus protease. Microbiol. Immunol. 1987;31:13–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1987.tb03064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lu Y., Feng J., Wu Z., Jian J. Genotype analysis of collagenase gene by PCR-SSCP in Vibrio alginolyticus and its association with virulence to marine fish. Curr. Microbiol. 2011;62:1697–1703. doi: 10.1007/s00284-011-9916-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Smith G.C., Merkel J.R. Collagenolytic activity of Vibrio vulnificus: Potential contribution to its invasiveness. Infect. Immun. 1982;35:1155–1156. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.3.1155-1156.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McLaughlin J.B., DePaola A., Bopp C.A., Martinek K.A., Napolilli N.P., Allison C.G., Murray S.L., Thompson E.C., Bird M.M., Middaugh J.P. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1463–1470. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ansaruzzaman M., Lucas M., Deen J.L., Bhuiyan N.A., Wang X.-Y., Safa A., Sultana M., Chowdhury A., Nair G.B., Sack D.A., et al. Pandemic serovars (O3:K6 and O4:K68) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus associated with diarrhea in Mozambique: Spread of the pandemic into the African continent. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:2559–2562. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.6.2559-2562.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Drake S.L., DePaola A., Jaykus L.-A. An Overview of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2007;6:120–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2007.00022.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nair G.B., Ramamurthy T., Bhattacharya S.K., Dutta B., Takeda Y., Sack D.A. Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007;20:39–48. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00025-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Su Y.C., Liu C. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: A concern of seafood safety. Food Microbiol. 2007;24:549–558. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xu X., Wu Q., Zhang J., Cheng J., Zhang S., Wu K. Prevalence, pathogenicity, and serotypes of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shrimp from Chinese retail markets. Food Control. 2014;46:81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.04.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yu Q., Niu M., Yu M., Liu Y., Wang D., Shi X. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from retail shellfish in Shanghai. Food Control. 2016;60:263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim S.K., Yang J.Y., Cha J. Cloning and sequence analysis of a novel metalloprotease gene from Vibrio parahaemolyticus 04. Gene. 2002;283:277–286. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00882-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Keil-Dlouha V., Misrahi R., Keil B. The induction of collagenase and a neutral proteinase by their high molecular weight substrates in Achromobacter iophagus. J. Mol. Biol. 1976;107:293–305. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(76)80006-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Reid G.C., Woods D.R., Robb F.T. Peptone induction and rifampin-insensitive collagenase production by Vibrio alginolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 1980;142:447–454. doi: 10.1128/jb.142.2.447-454.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mima T., Gotoh K., Yamamoto Y., Maeda K., Shirakawa T., Matsui S., Murata Y., Koide T., Tokumitsu H., Matsushita O. Expression of Collagenase is Regulated by the VarS/VarA Two-Component Regulatory System in Vibrio alginolyticus. J. Membr. Biol. 2018;251:51–63. doi: 10.1007/s00232-017-9991-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Keil-Dlouha V., Emod I., Soubigou P., Bagilet L.K., Keil B. Cell-surface collagen-binding protein in the procaryote Achromobacter iophagus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1983;727:115–121. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(83)90375-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hare P., Long S., Robb F.T., Woods D.R. Regulation of exoprotease production by temperature and oxygen in Vibrio alginolyticus. Arch. Microbiol. 1981;130:276–280. doi: 10.1007/BF00425940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Brock F.M., Forsberg C.W., Buchanan-Smith J.G. Proteolytic activity of rumen microorganisms and effects of proteinase inhibitors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982;44:561–569. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.3.561-569.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Coêlho D.F., Saturnino T.P., Fernandes F.F., Mazzola P.G., Silveira E., Tambourgi E.B. Azocasein Substrate for Determination of Proteolytic Activity: Reexamining a Traditional Method Using Bromelain Samples. BioMed Res. Int. 2016;2016:8409183. doi: 10.1155/2016/8409183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mandl I. Collagenases and Elastases. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1961;23:163–264. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Moore S., Stein W.H. Photometric Ninhydrin Method for Use in the Chromatography of Amino Acids. J. Biol. Chem. 1948;176:367–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jones P., Binns D., Chang H.-Y., Fraser M., Li W., McAnulla C., McWilliam H., Maslen J., Mitchell A., Nuka G., et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Finn R.D., Coggill P., Eberhardt R.Y., Eddy S.R., Mistry J., Mitchell A.L., Potter S.C., Punta M., Qureshi M., Sangrador-Vegas A., et al. The Pfam protein families database: Towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D279–D285. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sigrist C.J.A., de Castro E., Cerutti L., Cuche B.A., Hulo N., Bridge A., Bougueleret L., Xenarios I. New and continuing developments at PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D344–D347. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kelley L.A., Mezulis S., Yates C.M., Wass M.N., Sternberg M.J.E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nicosia A., Maggio T., Costa S., Salamone M., Tagliavia M., Mazzola S., Gianguzza F., Cuttitta A. Maintenance of a Protein Structure in the Dynamic Evolution of TIMPs over 600 Million Years. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016;8:1056–1071. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Cuttitta A., Ragusa M.A., Costa S., Bennici C., Colombo P., Mazzola S., Gianguzza F., Nicosia A. Evolutionary conserved mechanisms pervade structure and transcriptional modulation of allograft inflammatory factor-1 from sea anemone Anemonia viridis. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 2017;67:86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ragusa M.A., Nicosia A., Costa S., Cuttitta A., Gianguzza F. Metallothionein Gene Family in the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus: Gene Structure, Differential Expression and Phylogenetic Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:812. doi: 10.3390/ijms18040812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nicosia A., Bennici C., Biondo G., Costa S., Di Natale M., Masullo T., Monastero C., Ragusa M.A., Tagliavia M., Cuttitta A. Characterization of Translationally Controlled Tumour Protein from the Sea Anemone Anemonia viridis and Transcriptome Wide Identification of Cnidarian Homologues. Genes. 2018;9:30. doi: 10.3390/genes9010030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ragusa M.A., Nicosia A., Costa S., Casano C., Gianguzza F. A Survey on Tubulin and Arginine Methyltransferase Families Sheds Light on P. lividus Embryo as Model System for Antiproliferative Drug Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2136. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Armon A., Graur D., Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: An algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J. Mol. Biol. 2001;307:447–463. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Matsushita O., Yoshihara K., Katayama S., Minami J., Okabe A. Purification and characterization of Clostridium perfringens 120-kilodalton collagenase and nucleotide sequence of the corresponding gene. J. Bacteriol. 1994;176:149–156. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.1.149-156.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Salamone M., Saladino S., Pampalone M., Campora S., Ghersi G. Tissue Dissociation and Primary Cells Isolation Using Recombinant Collagenases Class I and II. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014;38:247–252. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Emory S.A., Bouvet P., Belasco J.G. A 5’-terminal stem-loop structure can stabilize mRNA in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1992;6:135–148. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Arnold T.E., Yu J., Belasco J.G. mRNA stabilization by the ompA 5’ untranslated region: Two protective elements hinder distinct pathways for mRNA degradation. RNA. 1998;4:319–330. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lin H.-H., Hsu C.-C., Yang C.-D., Ju Y.-W., Chen Y.-P., Tseng C.-P. Negative effect of glucose on ompA mRNA stability: A potential role of cyclic AMP in the repression of hfq in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:5833–5840. doi: 10.1128/JB.05359-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tagliavia M., Salamone M., Bennici C., Quatrini P., Cuttitta A. A modified culture medium for improved isolation of marine vibrios. MicrobiologyOpen. 2019;8:e835. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tagliavia M., Cuttitta A. Exploiting translational coupling for the selection of cells producing toxic recombinant proteins from expression vectors. BioTechniques. 2016;60:113–118. doi: 10.2144/000114387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]