Re-routing photosynthetic energy for continuous hydrogen production in vivo

Abstract

Background

Hydrogen is considered a promising energy vector that can be produced from sustainable resources such as sunlight and water. In green algae, such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, photoproduction of hydrogen is catalyzed by the enzyme [FeFe]-hydrogenase (HydA). Although highly efficient, this process is transitory and thought to serve as a release valve for excess reducing power. Up to date, prolonged production of hydrogen was achieved by the deprivation of either nutrients or light, thus, hindering the full potential of photosynthetic hydrogen production. Previously we showed that the enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) can enhance HydA activity in vitro, specifically when tied together to a fusion protein.

Results

In this work, we explored the in vivo hydrogen production phenotype of HydA–SOD fusion. We found a sustained hydrogen production, which is dependent on linear electron flow, although other pathways feed it as well. In addition, other characteristics such as slower growth and oxygen production were also observed in Hyd–SOD-expressing algae.

Conclusions

The Hyd–SOD fusion manages to outcompete the Calvin–Benson cycle, allowing sustained hydrogen production for up to 14 days in non-limiting conditions.

Introduction

Hydrogen (H₂) is a potential clean energy carrier that can replace fossil fuels when produced from renewable resources [1–3]. Photobiological H₂ production, carried out by most green microalgae, is regarded as a promising clean and efficient source for this valuable commodity [4–6]. These photosynthetic organisms can dispose surplus electrons generated under specific conditions (e.g., anaerobiosis) [7] by expressing hydrogenases–metalloenzymes that can reversibly reduce protons to molecular H₂ [8]. One such microalga is the well-studied eukaryotic microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, for which the H₂ production process was thoroughly investigated [9–12]. C. reinhardtii expresses two [FeFe]-hydrogenase isoenzymes, HydA1 and HydA2, which are encoded in the nucleus, and subsequently transferred to the chloroplast stroma [13]. Activation of the hydrogenases requires the assembly of a di-iron subsite by a set of maturases (HydE/HydF and HydG), which are strongly induced upon anoxia [14]. HydA1/2 can serve as an electron sink for fermentation processes in dark, anoxic conditions [15, 16]. They are also thought to allow electron transport following dark anoxia, to build up a sufficient proton motive force for ATP production before electrons are re-directed towards CO₂ fixation [17]. However, H₂ production is a short-lived sink since molecular oxygen (O₂) generated by water splitting will eventually inactivate HydA1/2 irreversibly [18–20]. Sulfur deprivation has been widely used to cope with the O₂ sensitivity of HydA1/2, as it results in lowered levels of photosystem II (PSII) activity, leading to anoxia and sustained H₂ production [21, 22]. Alternatively, recent protocols suggest applying chemical scavengers or using photosystem ratio imbalance to maintain anoxia in H₂-producing cultures [23–25].

HydA1/2 are reduced by the mobile electron mediator, ferredoxin (Fd), which distributes electrons from the membrane complex photosystem I (PSI) [26]. Notably, H₂ production is a minor sink for the electrons leaving PSI. The most prominent sink is CO₂ fixation by the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, via the ferredoxin–NADPH oxidoreductase (FNR). FNR oxidizes Fd to create low-potential reductant (NADPH) that is essential for CO₂ fixation. Since it has a vital role in carbon fixation, FNR evolved to be a major acceptor of the linear electron flow (LEF). With high abundance and stronger affinity for Fd [27, 28], FNR can easily outcompete HydA1/2. In addition, direct binding to PSI was also suggested as a mechanism for FNR superiority—by increasing the access of FNR to reduced Fd [29, 30].

Hydrogenase’s high sensitivity to O₂ has been considered the most challenging limitation on algal H₂ production [31]. However, in recent years several studies highlighted the role of the CBB cycle in inhibiting H₂ production even before this inactivation takes place. Milrad et al. observed that under non-limiting conditions (TAP media), C. reinhardtii light-driven H₂ production decays within the first 2 min following dark anoxia despite having an active pool of HydA1/2. Hence, H₂ production is inhibited by competition with CBB cycle prior to O₂ inactivation [32].

Recent alternative production methods, aiming to bypass the electron loss for CBB cycle, further support this observation. Nagy et al. used media lacking CO₂ to deprive CBB cycle rendering it inactive [24]. Kosurov et al. employed a light scheme composed of fluctuations between dark and light, thus preventing the proper initiation of CBB cycle [33]. In both methods, sustained H₂ production was observed for several days, whereas O₂ was consumed by either chemical absorbent or respiration. A different approach to bypass the electron loss is to employ synthetic biology. Instead of directly inhibiting CBB cycle, HydA can be modified to improve its competitive ability. This could allow HydA to outcompete CBB cycle and dominate the electron pool without the need for special treatment. In this regard, we previously showed that a fusion of Fd with HydA shifts electron flow favorably towards H₂ production rather than the FNR pathway [29]. Based on this approach, we developed a fusion of HydA to Fe-SOD (Hyd–SOD). SODs are a family of metalloenzymes which functions in the elimination of oxygen radicals in all cellular compartments [34]. C. reinhardtii thylakoid stroma contains the Fe-SOD type [35] and, therefore, this form was chosen as a fusion partner. HydA high susceptibility to O₂ led us to initially hypothesize that SOD might protect HydA under aerobic stress. However, in vitro experiment conducted with purified proteins showed an unexpected enhancement of HydA activity by SOD, both in the presence and absence of oxygen. Furthermore, Hyd–SOD fusion showed remarkable capabilities in reconstituted photosynthetic experiments [36]. Although the exact mechanism was unknown, we believed the phenomenon was intriguing enough for further study. Thus, in this study we analyzed the Hyd–SOD fusion protein in vivo, focusing on its effect on C. reinhardtii H₂ production under non-limiting conditions.

Methods

Transformation, screening and immunoblot analysis

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii codon-optimized sequence (GeneArt), coding for the fusion protein Hyd–SOD, was inserted into pChlamy_1 expression vector (GeneArt). The fusion sequence was cloned under the Hsp70A-RbcS2 promoter with an Fd transit peptide sequence for chloroplast delivery [37]. The plasmid was transformed by electroporation to the nucleus of HydA1–HydA2 double mutant [38] (DM) according to GeneArt Chlamydomonas Engineering Kit protocol (Life Technologies). For positive clone screening, algae were overlaid with engineered H₂-sensing R. capsulatus and left overnight [39]. The plates were then scanned using the Fuji FLA-5100 fluorescence imager. A 473-nm laser was used for excitation, whereas 510- and 665-nm filters were used for quantifying GFP luminescence and chlorophyll density, respectively. Genomic DNA isolation was preformed using E.Z.N.A.^® SP Plant DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek). Immunoblot analysis was used for protein expression verification according to Eilenberg et al. [37]. Whole cell protein extraction was preformed according to Rühle et al. [40].

Cell cultivation

Inoculums were cultivated in 50 mL TAP (Tris/acetate/phosphate) medium [41] kept in Erlenmeyer flasks capped with a silicone sponge. Cells were grown under constant irradiation of 100 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ at 24.5 °C with stirring until they reached early log phase (2–5 μg[Chl] mL⁻¹). Chlorophyll (Chl) was extracted and measured according to Jeffrey and Humphrey [42]. The cells were then centrifuged at 3300g for 2 min and resuspended in a fresh medium.

Methyl viologen activity measurements

2 mL cell suspension (50 µg[Chl] mL⁻¹) was flushed with argon gas (Ar) and incubated for 2 h in the dark while shaking (80 RPM). Glucose oxidase (40 units mL⁻¹), catalase (40 units mL⁻¹), and glucose (20 mM) were added for complete anoxia. Chemical reaction buffer [43] 3× stock (for final concentration of 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.2, 1 M NaCl, 10 mM methyl viologen, 20 mM sodium dithionite, and 0.2% [V/V] Triton X-100) was prepared in an anaerobic glove box (H₂/N₂). The buffer was sealed in a vial and flushed with Ar for 10 min to remove residual H₂ traces. For HydA activity measurements, 1 mL reaction buffer was added to the cell suspension. The vials were then incubated at 50 °C in a water bath, while 500 µL of headspace gas was drawn in 6-min intervals. The concentration of H₂ in the vial’s headspace was measured by a Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II gas chromatograph. For each sample, the chemical activity rate of the active HydA was determined in µmol H₂ mg[Chl]⁻¹ h⁻¹.

Oxygen measurements and electron transfer rate (ETR)

Cells were resuspended to 15 µg[Chl] mL⁻¹ in fresh TAP. For O₂ consumption, samples were directly transferred to FireStingO₂ OXVIAL4 respiration vial (Pyro science) and kept in the dark. For net O₂ evolution, samples were flushed with N₂ for 5 min to remove oxygen, and then transferred to 5 mL vial fitted with FireStingO2 OXROB3 probe (Pyro science). Following a 10-min dark period, light was switched on and the irradiance was increased every 5 min. Red actinic light was supplied by a Dual-Pulse Amplitude Modulated Fluorometer (DUAL-PAM-100, Walz). The module used was DUAL-DB. ETR measurements utilized the same setup, except for using an open cuvette to maintain aerobiosis. A saturating pulse (3000 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) was used at each irradiance level for quantum yield determination. The ETR was calculated according to

$$\text{ETR}=Y\left(\text{II}\right)\ast \text{PAR}\ast 0.5\ast \text{qA,}$$ 1

where Y(II) is the effective quantum yield of PSII during a light period (F/Fm′), PAR is the photosynthetically active radiation (µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ in the 400–700 nm range), qA is the absorbed light coefficient and 0.5 is a constant corresponding to a 1:1 ratio between PSII and PSI [44–46].

Short-term H₂ production

QMS 200 M1 (Pfeiffer Vacuum) membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS) was used to record gas exchange in vivo. 5 mL of cells was resuspended to 15 µg[Chl] mL⁻¹ in a medium containing TAP and 50 mM HEPES at pH 7.8. The culture was then incubated for 2 h in the dark in a sealed 5-mL quartz cuvette. Glucose oxidase (40 units mL⁻¹), catalase (40 units mL⁻¹), and glucose (20 mM) were added for complete anoxia. For each experiment, the cuvette was fitted into a metabolic chamber (Optical unit ED-101US/MD, Walz) which kept the sample at 27 °C during the experiments. The cuvette was exposed to 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ red actinic light supplied by a Dual-Pulse Amplitude Modulated Fluorometer (DUAL-PAM-100, Walz). The modules used were DUAL-DR and NIR. Light intensity was determined by a Walz light detector (model US-SQS/L) attached to a Li-250A light meter (LI-COR Biosciences). If stated, DCMU (200 µM), DBMIB (20 µM) or GA (10 mM) was added 10 min prior to light exposure. The masses of H₂, N, O₂ and Ar were repeatedly measured with 3-s interval per mass. O₂ trace was normalized to the Ar trace to compensate for the continuous removal of the measured gas by the vacuum line [47]; H₂ signal was normalized and measured as described [48].

Long-term H₂ production assay

1 L of algal culture was grown in normal conditions (see “Cell cultivation”) to high density. The cells were harvested (4000×g, 5 min), resuspended to 10 µg[Chl] mL⁻¹ in fresh TAP with 5 mM Na₂SO₃ [23] and transferred to 1-L BlueSens bioreactors. The bioreactors were kept at 27 °C with constant stirring. Following the transfer to the BlueSens system, the cultures were flushed with N₂ for 2 min and subsequently kept in the dark for 2 h to achieve anaerobic conditions. At this point, light (LED, 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) was turned on and both O₂ and H₂ were measured using thermal conductivity (TCD) sensors. Gas output was monitored using milligascounter mgc-1 pmma (Ritter) attached to the bioreactor headspace. If stated, 200 µM DCMU was added through a septum sealed sampling valve, or 2 mL cell suspension was drawn for starch measurements. Starch content was determined using Megazyme’s Total Starch Assay Kit (AA/AMG).

Growth curve measurements

Aerobic growth curves were obtained using Multi-Cultivator MC 1000-OD (Photon Systems Instruments). Cells were inoculated to 0.1 A_680nm and cultivated under 27 °C, 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ light with constant air bubbling. Cell density was measured as A_680nm in 10-min intervals. Anoxic growth was measured in 1-min intervals using Hamilton Dencytee sensor (880 nm) attached to the BlueSens bioreactor.

Results

Engineering of Hyd–SOD-expressing clones

The Hyd–SOD gene was codon optimized, cloned into GeneArt pchlamy1 vector (Fig. 1a) and transformed by electroporation into the nucleus of DM [38]. This procedure integrates the DNA strand into the genome by non-homologous end joining, resulting in unpredicted locations of the new insert in the genome. This causes a ‘position effect’, in which expression levels vary between different clones transformed with the same DNA fragment [49]. Therefore, colonies were initially screened for H₂ production using the Rhodobacter encapsulates (Rhodo) assay (Fig. 1b) [39, 50]. Since the Rhodo assay only provides a rough estimation for the expression level of the enzyme, selected clones were further analyzed by the methyl viologen (MV) assay. The MV assay measures the kinetics of H₂ production and, therefore, can accurately quantity the active pool of the enzyme, (i.e., the mature enzyme pool) [37, 43]. To induce maturation, cultures were incubated in the dark under mild room temperature conditions. Following dark induction, the activity of the fusion was observed to be stable for several days (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Surprisingly, despite having significantly large halos in the Rhodo assay, most of the Hyd–SOD-expressing clones (HS clones) had low abundance of active protein (Fig. 1b, Table 1). Notably, even the highest expressing clone, HS-14, showed an order of magnitude less active protein than a complement strain expressing native HydA1 gene (HydA1+), in the parental DM. The low protein abundance in HS clones also made it difficult to detect the fusion protein using western blot. Even though the complete gene was successfully inserted into the genome (Fig. 1c), clear visible protein band in the correct size (~ 80 KDa) appeared only in the highest expressing HS-14 clone (Fig. 1d). Interestingly, this band could not be detected in the soluble fraction, despite the soluble nature of the fusion protein [36]. For further analysis, we selected three clones expressing the Hyd–SOD fusion protein at several levels: HS-14 (high), HS-40 (medium) and HS-62 (low) (Table 1). Thus, by exploiting the position effect, we were able to measure the correlation between fusion abundance, photosynthetic parameters and H₂ production.

Fig. 1.

Construction and screening of HS mutants. a Plasmid vector map of pchlamy1 Hyd–SOD. b R. capsulatus screen (Rhodo assay) for HydA–SOD-expressing clones. Algae chlorophyll fluorescence is green whereas dark halation represents GFP produced by R. capsulatus due to H₂ presence. The WT strain CC-124 (High), Fd–HydA-expressing clones (Pos.) and DM (Neg.) clones were used as positive, transformant reference and negative controls, respectively. Numbers represent HS clones. c PCR analysis of genomic DNA from DM, HS-14, HS-40 and HS-62 cells. Primers for pChlmy1 rbcS promotor (forward) and the 3′UTR (reverse) were used and the expected amplified chain length is 2400 bp. d Immunoblot analysis for the detection of Hyd–SOD expression. Soluble fraction [S] and whole cell protein extraction [T] from DM and HS-14 were loaded on 4–12% Bis–Tris PAGE (Life Technologies) and probed with rabbit polyclonal HydA1/2 antibodies and ponceau red

Table 1.

Estimation of Hyd–SOD abundance by the analysis of active HydA

Strain	Active enzyme mean ± SE, µmole[H2] (mg[Chl] × h)−1
W.T [cc124]	104.6 ± 14.4
W.T [D66]	37.68 ± 8
HydA1+	34.57 ±  8.93
HS-1	0.02 ±  0.01
HS-14a	2.42 ±  0.54
HS-18	0.03 ±  0.02
HS-24	0.1 ±  0.02
HS-40a	0.62 ±  0.05
HS-52	0.12 ± 0.02
HS-55	0.06 ±  0.02
HS-62a	0.17 ±  0.03
HS-73	0.19 ±  0.03
HS-100	0.08 ± 0.03

^aSelected clones

Photosynthetic parameters

In oxygenic photosynthesis, evolution of molecular oxygen is directly linked to the activity of the photosynthetic apparatus. Therefore, photosynthesis–irradiance curves of both chlorophyll fluorescence and O₂ kinetics were conducted to better understand the physiology of the different clones. Dissolved O₂ consumption was measured in the dark, while net O₂ evolution was measured under increasing irradiance. Calculation of O₂ production rates after the deduction of mitochondrial respiration show that all of the HS clones have lower O₂ production rates compared to HydA1+ (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, O₂ evolution followed the opposite distribution of Hyd–SOD expression level, with HS-14 having an exceptionally low O₂ production capability, followed by HS-40 and HS-62 with the highest oxygen production rate among the HS clones. These results suggest an impaired electron transport in HS clones. Chlorophyll fluorescence and autotrophic growth in minimal media (TP) further support these observations whereas, in accordance with O₂ measurements, HS-14 shows the lowest ETR (Fig. 2b) and growth rate (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, HS-14 clone features photoinhibition at the relatively low light intensity of 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹. Therefore, this irradiance was chosen for further analysis.

Fig. 2.

Photosynthetic parameters of HS mutants. a Gross O₂ evolution in response to increased irradiance of HydA1+, HS-14, HS-40 and HS-62 (black, green, blue and red, respectively). Dissolved O₂ evolution was measured in a 5-mL vial fitted with Pyroscience FireSting O₂ OXROB3 probe, and OXVIAL4 respiration vial. Error bars are in SE (n = 3). b Chlorophyll fluorescence measurement. ETR in response to increased irradiance of HydA1+, HS-14, HS-40 and HS-62 (black, green, blue and red, respectively) was measured using Walz Dual-PAM-100. Error bars are in SE (n = 3). c Autotrophic growth of HydA1+ and 3 HS clones: HS-14, HS-40 and HS-62 (black, green, blue and red, respectively) under aerobic conditions, measured in A_680nm

Photosynthetic H₂ production

The photosynthetic activity of the engineered clones was analyzed using a membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS, Fig. 3). Each clone was subjected to 2 h of dark incubation, during which the Hyd–SOD enzyme accumulated and matured in the presence of an active oxygen removal system (see “Methods”). Following this, the cells were exposed to an irradiance of 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ and the dissolved H₂, O₂ and CO₂ were measured for 15 min. Recently, we showed [32] that at light onset following dark anoxia, H₂ production features a short burst of production, lasting ~ 2 min, which ceases due to competition with the CBB cycle. W.T (D66) and HydA1+ strains behaved as expected, showing a strong production rate at light onset which gradually decayed until complete cessation. HS clones, however, exhibit prolong steady linear production of H₂, following the initial burst (Fig. 3a). Notably, O₂ had no role in this observation, as anoxia was kept throughout the measurement by actively removing any O₂ generated by photosynthesis (Fig. 3b), making any possible O₂ effect on HydA activity negligible. Therefore, H₂ production rates of the different clones are directly linked to the pool of active Hyd–SOD fusion protein within each of those clones. Indeed, H₂ production rates follow the same pattern as the clone’s expression level. The continuous H₂ production hints at an improved ability to compete with the CBB cycle. In addition, CO₂ exchange at light onset shows a profound effect, in which all HS clones lack uptake of this crucial CBB cycle substrate during the measurement (Fig. 3c). To further investigate this, we added a CBB cycle inhibitor glycol aldehyde (GA). When added to HydA1+, GA altered the H₂ production phenotype to a linear production, similar to that of the HS clones (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, while GA did not alter the H₂ production phenotype in HS-14 clone, it had a minor effect on the H₂ production rates. The increased rate in the presence of GA suggests that the CBB cycle is still active in the non-treated cells. Following this observation, we were interested in elucidating the electron source of the steady H₂ production observed. We used several inhibitors to tackle this question: (i) (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea) (DCMU), which blocks electron transfer from PSII and, thus effectively eliminates LEF. (ii) 2,5-Dibromo-6-isopropyl-3-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone (DBMIB), which inhibits electron transfer from cytochrome b₆f and, therefore, completely deprives PSI of any electrons. When DCMU was added to HS clones, H₂ production rate was decreased by almost 50%. The addition of DBMIB seems to have resulted in near-complete cessation of photosynthetic H₂ production, as the observed residual production is likely due to fermentation [7] (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 3.

Short-term H₂ photoproduction under anaerobiosis. H₂, O₂ and CO₂ exchange was measured using a membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS) in D66 wild-type (W.T, n = 3) HydA1+ (n = 7) and 3 HS clones: HS-14 (n = 7), HS-40 (n = 7) and HS-62 (n = 3) (dash, black, green, blue and red, respectively). 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ light was switched on at t = 0. SE is represented by error bars. a H₂ production rate. b Dissolved O₂ concentration. SE is represented by painted area in the corresponding sample color. c CO₂ exchange rate

Fig. 4.

Inhibitors’ effect on H₂ production. H₂ production was measured using a membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS). 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ light was switched on at t = 0, whereas inhibitors were added 10 min prior. SE is represented by error bars. a CBB cycle inhibitor effect on H₂ photoproduction rate. H₂ evolution was measured in non-treated cells (NT, solid line) and GA-treated cells (GA+, dash line). HydA1+ (black, n = 4) and HS-14 (red, n = 4) were tested. b The effect of photosynthetic apparatus inhibitors on HS clone’s H₂ photoproduction rate. H₂ evolution was measured in non-treated cells (NT, n = 5), DCMU-treated cells (DCMU+, n = 4) and DBMIB-treated cells (DBMIB+, n = 3) (green, blue and red, respectively)

Prolonged photosynthetic H₂ production

To estimate the longevity of H₂ production in the HS clones, long-term experiments in TAP media were performed. We used a 1-L photobioreactor (BlueSens) designed to simultaneously monitor culture parameters such as H₂ and O₂ concentration, pH, OD, gas output and temperature (Fig. 5a). Importantly, under our experimental conditions (cell density of 10 µg[chl] ml⁻¹ and light intensity of 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹), the oxygen uptake capacity of the engineered clones was sufficient for maintaining anaerobiosis throughout the experiment (Fig. 5b). This is extremely important since O₂ presence is devastating for HydA activity. The exception is HydA+, which starts accumulating O₂ after 60 h of continuous light. Notably, in HydA+, H₂ accumulation started at time 0 and ceased after 40 h, likely due to competition with the CBB cycle, almost an entire day before oxygen started accumulating. In accordance with the MIMS results, H₂ production rate was the highest in HS-14 followed by HS-40 and finally HS-62. All the HS clones continuously produced H₂ for a duration of almost 5 days (Fig. 5c), apart from HS-14 which strikingly continued to produce for an additional 7 days (Fig. 6a). Interestingly, during that time, the growth of HS clones seemed to be hindered: while mixotrophic aerobically grown cultures show typical logarithmic growth phenotypes (Fig. 5e), anaerobically H₂-producing cultures of HS-40 and HS-62 showed impaired growth for 5 days, and HS-14 growth was inhibited completely. Notably, HydA1+ still exhibits aerobic-like growth phenotype, suggesting the Hyd–SOD fusion had a role in the hindrance (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5.

Long-term H₂ photoproduction in 1-L BlueSens photobioreactors. a Picture of the BlueSens 1-L photobioreactor measuring system. The bioreactors were continuously illuminated at 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹. Cultures of HydA1+ (n = 8) and 3 HS clones: HS-14 (n = 5), HS-40 (n = 3) and HS-62 (n = 3) (black, green, blue and red, respectively) were measured. TCD sensors (BlueSens) were used to monitor. b O₂ accumulation and c H₂ accumulation in the bioreactor headspace. Error bars are in SE. The inset in (c) is a zoomed window of the blue, red and black traces. d Corresponding cell density of the different clones under the bioreactors anoxic mixotrophic conditions, measured in A_880nm by Hamilton Dencytee sensor. e Cell density of the different clones under aerobic mixotrophic conditions, measured in A_680nm. Cultivation was performed in Multi-Cultivator MC 1000-OD under constant illumination of 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ (n = 4)

Fig. 6.

Phenotype of clone HS-14. a HS-14 starch accumulation during H₂ production period. The bioreactors were continually illuminated at 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹. 2 mL samples were drawn for starch determination (black) while TCD sensors monitored H₂ and O₂ evolution (green and blue, respectively). b Gas output during starch analysis. Gas flow was measured using Ritter’s milligascounter attached to the culture headspace. Error bars are in SE (n = 4). c Addition of DCMU to HS-14 during H₂ production phases. The bioreactors were continuously illuminated at 180 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹. Dashed black lines represent DCMU-added cultures (DCMU+), whereas the arrows indicate the DCMU addition time point. Green line represents non-treated culture (NT). Error bars are in SE (n = 4)

The unique phenotype of clone HS-14

A continuous 7-day period of H₂ production was already reported previously using various methods [51–53]. Furthermore, the recently used PSI/PSII ratio imbalance in C. reinhardtii C3 mutant results in a record 42 days of H₂ production in standard TAP media (Table 2). However, the rate of H₂ production in the C3 mutant was relatively low and not constant during these 40 days, probably due to the reduction in PSII activity [25]. Therefore, the novel capability of clone HS-14 to produce H₂ for a period of 14 days in a high steady rate, without the need for special conditions to achieve this phenotype, is of particular interest. Analysis of starch content showed that starch was accumulated in the first 24 h and remained constant for an additional 3 days, after which a slow decrease was observed. Interestingly, starch consumption coincided with a slightly increased rate of H₂ production (Fig. 6a). The same positive trend for H₂ is also visible by measuring gas volume. Two phases of H₂ production rate were observed: an initial rate of 6 mL H₂ L⁻¹ culture per day lasting for 4 days, followed by an enhanced 20 mL H₂ L⁻¹ culture per day, lasting for additional 8 days (Fig. 6b). These findings could indicate that carbohydrate could be an additional source of electron following the initial 4 days. To determine the electrons source in each phase, DCMU was added. Surprisingly, DCMU addition in both phases completely inhibited H₂ production (Fig. 6c), suggesting that linear electron flow is a crucial source of electrons for this prolonged production.

Table 2.

Comparison of experimental H₂ production rates and duration by the Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Strain	Conditions\light intensity, µmol photons m−2 s−1	Max H2 Production rate, mL [H2] d−1 L−1 culture	Total duration (d)	Refs.
CC-124	Sulfur deprivation\60	11	7	Steinbeck et al. [21]
Dang 137+	Magnesium deprivation\80	10	7	Volgusheva et al. [53]
Dang 137+	Phosphorus deprivation\45	23	6	Batyrova et al. [52]
704	Low light\22	5.3	3	Jurado-Oller et al. [31]
CC-124	Light fluctuations\200	19.5	3	Kosourov et al. [33]
CC-124	CO2 limitation\320	50	4	Nagy et al. [24]
C3 mutant	Low light\30	3	42	Krishna et al. [25]
HS-14	Non-limiting\180	20	14	Present study

If not described by the text, H₂ Production rate was calculated according to the publications figures. If necessary, units were converted to mL [H₂] using PV = nRT equation

Discussion

H₂ production from photosynthetic organisms not only has a great potential, but also many challenges to overcome. One of the major challenges is the transitory nature of H₂ production in green algae, which renders it unsustainable. This transitory nature was thought to stem from simultaneous O₂ evolution and, indeed, anaerobiosis is a prerequisite for H₂ production. Therefore, various methods were developed to eliminate the O₂ production. Deprivation of nutrients, for example, resulting in various physiological stresses, establishes the conditions required for the induction and maintenance of long-term H₂ production [22, 51, 52, 54]. Recently, however, Milrad et al. demonstrated that under complete anoxia, the fierce competition with the CBB cycle prevents sustained H₂ production at light onset following dark anoxia [32]. Further evidence for this observation is provided by two new methods that support prolonged production [24, 33]. In both methods, the prolonged production is enabled by reducing the electron loss to the CBB cycle, by limiting either CO₂ or light duration. Thus, overcoming the competition with the CBB cycle is the first hurdle in the process of engineering viable H₂ production. In this work, we report sustained H₂ production under non-limiting conditions via the expression of the Hyd–SOD fusion protein, demonstrating the protein’s ability to outcompete the CBB cycle.

It is well documented that steady H₂ production can take place as long as the CBB cycle is inhibited [24, 55]. Such inhibition, if constant, is expected to manifest in a reduced growth rate due to the inhibition of carbon fixation [56]. Furthermore, a diminished CBB cycle will eventually result in overreduction of the plastoquinone pool and acidification of the lumen [57, 58]. Consequently, the overall photosynthetic activity will decelerate leading to impaired ETR and O₂ evolution [59, 60]. Indeed, HS clones exhibit diminished rates of O₂ evolution in accordance to the expression level of a given clone. This observation is particularly noticeable in the high expressing HS-14. Furthermore, autotrophic growth of the HS clones was also slightly impaired (Fig. 2). This is an unexpected phenotype for the fusion protein, as HydA should not remain active under aerobic conditions. Therefore, it is likely caused by the SOD moiety. Conversely, in air-grown mixotrophic cultures, the lower photosynthetic activity did not result in a slower growth rate (Fig. 5e). These findings suggest that while the inactive fusion protein might affect the CBB cycle, it is negligible under non-limiting mixotrophic conditions.

Upon HydA activation, the effect of the fusion protein becomes apparent. Normally, at light onset following dark anoxia, H₂ production is characterized by a short burst which decays within few minutes. However, real-time MIMS measurement on HS clones showed a stable linear H₂ production phonotype similar to the phenotype with inhibited CBB cycle in the HydA1+ complement strain (Figs. 3a, 4a). However, in contrast to HydA1+, the linear H₂ production phenotype of HS clones is observed even when the CBB cycle is active, as was demonstrated by the addition of GA to HS-14 (Fig. 4a). Strikingly, in scaled-up 1-L photobioreactor experiments following an anaerobic incubation of 2 h, sustained H₂ production lasted up to 14 days. The energy source for this prolonged production was mainly LEF, with some other contributions through the quinone pool, such as carbohydrate degradation, as was shown by the determination of starch content (Fig. 6a). The dominant contribution of LEF was demonstrated by the elimination of ~ 50% of H₂ production rate following the addition of DCMU in short-term measurement (Fig. 4b) and the complete cessation of the process in the long term (Fig. 6c). This phenomenon could also explain the contradiction between the large Rhodo halos and the relatively low abundance of active protein (Fig. 1b, Table 1). Since the Rhodo assay lasts several hours, H₂ continuously accumulated in the HS mutants, leading to larger halos in comparison to the W.T (for which high, but very short duration of H₂ production takes place). Since the addition of an oxygen removal system effectively eliminates the effect of O₂ on HydA activity, we hypothesize that the continuous H₂ production of the Hyd–SOD fusion protein is due to improved ability to compete with the CBB cycle. Furthermore, the positive correlation between the expression level of the fusion protein and photosynthetic H₂ production rate might indicate that the entire pool of active Hyd–SOD participates in the photosynthetic H₂ production. In other words, the rate-limiting step is protein expression. Further support can be found by inspecting the anoxic growth of the HS clones during the H₂ production phase. It seems that while the Hyd–SOD fusion protein is active under anoxia, it manages to divert electrons from the CBB cycle. This leads to a slower growth rate than the HydA1+ complement strain under anaerobiosis, especially in the high expressing HS-14 (Fig. 5d). Another intriguing feature of the HS-14 clone is its exceptionally prolonged H₂ production, lasting for 14 days. Since DCMU addition during carbohydrate degradation phase inhibits H₂ production (Fig. 6c), starch consumption following the initial 5 days can be interpreted as not being the source for H₂ production, but rather as an extra energy source for vitality, allowing the cells to survive this extended anaerobic period. Indeed, the extended time in the bioreactor conditions did not result in the culture death, as inoculum taken from the bioreactor to a fresh medium was successfully regrown (data not shown).

Although much effort was invested to understand the molecular mechanism behind this phenomenon, we could not reach a detailed explanation and, therefore, the mechanism behind the continuous H₂ production by Hyd–SOD is still largely elusive. Since immunoblot analysis showed that the protein was localized in the insoluble/membrane fraction and not in the soluble fraction as expected (Fig. 1d), we postulate that it might bound to PSI or it surrounding as suggested by Asada [61]. In addition, the impaired autotrophic growth and O₂ evolution in all the HS clones further support possible binding. We hypothesized that binding of Hyd–SOD to PSI could interfere with FNR activity and leads for these observations. Indeed, we were able to obtain some evidence indicating a direct binding of the fusion protein to PSI; however, decisive proof could not be obtained. For example, while studying the interaction using quartz crystal microbalance and dissipation [62] did support this notion, a classical isothermal titration calorimetry [56] and pull-down assays (Additional file 1: Figure S2) could not verify these findings. In this regard, it was already suggested that PSI binding could improve H₂ production in C. reinhardtii using the Fd–Hyd fusion protein [37]. However, attachment of a fusion protein to the single Fd-binding pocket [56] will likely reduce the accessibility of the binding site to free Fd; thus, the ability to reduce the HydA moiety might be affected. This possible hindrance can be overcome by fusing other partners to HydA. Indeed, Hyd–SOD clones surpass Fd–Hyd clones in both H₂ production rate and longevity, especially considering the low active protein abundance of the Hyd–SOD clones [43].

Another possible explanation for the improved ability of the Hyd–SOD fusion protein to compete with the CBB cycle is by outcompeting soluble FNR in the stroma, for example, via improved affinity to free Fd or by stabilizing product intermediates for faster catalysis. Thus, the addition of CBB cycle inhibitor, GA, should increase the availability of reduced Fd in the stroma and result in an increased rate of H₂ production. While such an increase was visible, it cannot be attributed to this specific hypothesis, as inhibition of the CBB cycle would result in higher H₂ production rate anyway, either because of direct binding to PSI or because of a stroma-scavenging mechanism.

Conclusions

Hyd–SOD fusion represents a promising pathway to overcome major challenges in H₂ production. Using this fusion technology, we managed to engineer an algae strain that could continuously produce H₂ for several days under non-limiting conditions. The Hyd–SOD fusion derives its electrons from water splitting. These results imply that HydA modification by fusion technology can be applied to overcome for CO₂ fixation competition without relying on destructive ways such as nutrient deprivation.

Abbreviations

HydA

algal [FeFe]-hydrogenase

SOD

algal [Fe] superoxide dismutase

Hyd–SOD

[FeFe]-hydrogenase–superoxide dismutase

H₂

hydrogen gas

O₂

molecular oxygen

PSII

photosystem II

Fd

ferredoxin

PSI

photosystem I

CBB

Calvin–Benson–Bassham

FNR

ferredoxin–NADP+-reductase

LEF

linear electron flow

Fd–HydA

ferredoxin–[FeFe]-hydrogenase fusion protein

PSI

photosystem-I

Hyd–SOD

[FeFe]-hydrogenase–superoxide dismutase fusion protein

DM

HydA1–HydA2 double mutant

TAP

tris/acetate/phosphate

Chl

chlorophyll

Ar

argon gas

ETR

electron transport rate

TCD

thermal conductivity detector

MV

methyl viologen

Rhodo

Rhodobacter encapsulates

HS clones

Hyd–SOD-expressing clones

MIMS

membrane inlet mass spectrometer

GA

glycol aldehyde

DCMU

(3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea)

DBMIB

dibromo-6-isopropyl-3-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone

Authors’ contributions

OB-Z and IY design and coordinated the study, carried out the molecular genetics and biochemical studies, immunoassays, photosynthetic parameters, performed the MIMS and BlueSens bioreactor measurements and drafted the manuscript. ED participated in the photosynthetic parameter’s analysis including ETR, growth and oxygen measurements. YF participated in the Rhodobacter assays. IY conceived the study, coordinated the research and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by NSF-BSF energy for sustainability 2016666 and by ISF 1646/16 and 2185/17.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

On behalf of all authors I confirm.

Consent for publication

On behalf of all authors I confirm.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13068-019-1608-3.