Introduction
Osteoradionecrosis is a serious complication that may occur following radiation therapy, particularly head and neck–directed radiation therapy. A very limited number of cases of cervical-spine osteoradionecrosis have been reported1–6 and only 2 involve altered fractionation radiation therapy.6 We present a patient with extensive osteoradionecrosis 9 years after receiving accelerated fractionation radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy.
Case report
A 51-year-old male presented with several months of odynophagia and dysphonia in 2005. Triple endoscopy revealed T4bN0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx involving the left base of the tongue. The patient was enrolled on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0129 and treated with a course of accelerated fractionation radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy.7 Per protocol, the patient received 18 fractions of 1.8 Gy daily followed by 12 days of twice-daily radiation therapy consisting of 1.8 Gy in the morning and a second daily fraction of 1.5 Gy for a total of 72 Gy delivered over the course of 6 weeks (Fig 1).
Figure 1.
Radiation treatment plan. A portion of the radiation treatment plan is shown. The 100% isodose line can be seen covering the anterior vertebral bodies.
The patient had no evidence of recurrent disease until he developed neck pain; a computed tomography scan in October 2014 showed possible local recurrence versus abscess formation for which he was treated with antibiotics. A follow-up computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed a persistent large pocket of air in the right lateral retropharyngeal space and anterior wedge-shaped compression fracture deformities consistent with osteoradionecrosis (Fig 2).
Figure 2.
Computed tomography scan of cervical spine reveals anterior wedge-shaped compression fracture deformities consistent with osteoradionecrosis in the C5 and C6 vertebral bodies.
Discussion
The majority of reports of cervical osteoradionecrosis involve standard fractionation of 1.8 Gy once a day (Table 1). Despite the development of osteoradionecrosis, all of these patients recovered following surgical and/or antibiotic treatment with the exception of 1 patient treated with 2.2 Gy/fx who remained wheelchair-bound and a second3 who died before treatment.
Table 1.
Published osteoradionecrosis case studies
| Author | Cancer histology/primary | Radiation dose (Gy/fx) | Chemotherapy | ORN treatment | Time to ORN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donovan et al1 | SCC/unknown | 80/- | - | Surgery, antibiotics, and O2 | 25 y |
| SCC/supraglottic larynx | 59.4/1.8 | - | Surgery, antibiotics, and O2 | 10 mo | |
| Undifferentiated/nasopharyngeal | 82.2 (43.2) | - | Antibiotics and O2 | 10 y | |
| Ng et al2 | SCC/posterior pharyngeal wall | 45/1.8 | - | Surgery and antibiotics | During RT (45 Gy in 25 treatments) |
| Lim et al3 | SCC/unknown | 55.8/1.8 | - | - | 9 y |
| Van Wyk et al4 | SCC/right vocal cord | 66/2.2 | - | Surgery | 20 y |
| Smith et al5 | SCC/tonsils | 70/- | Concurrent/ Cisplatin-bascd |
Surgery and antibiotics | 15 mo |
02, oxygen; ORN, osteoradionecrosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
There has been resurgent interest in the role of altered fractionation radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for improved local control and decreased tumor repopulation in head and neck cancers. Radiation treatment de-escalation is currently being explored for human papilloma positive head and neck cancer through RTOG 1016,8 in which altered fractionation radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab is the experimental arm. Major differences, however, between RTOG 1016 and RTOG 0129 include 6 once-weekly twice-daily treatments versus 12 sequential twice-daily treatments decreasing the likelihood of late effects as a result of incomplete repair on this more recent RTOG protocol. Although the incidence of mandibular osteonecrosis has been reported to increase with accelerated fractionation,9 incidences of cervical osteonecrosis after accelerated fractionation radiation therapy have only been reported once.6 Kosako et al6 describes 3 cases of cervical osteonecrosis (Table 2), 2 of whom were treated with accelerated fractionation and received antibiotic treatment for osteonecrosis but died from respiratory failure. Studies investigating accelerated versus standard fractionation radiation therapy for head and neck cancer have reported no difference in osteonecrosis rates10–13; however, follow-up was only 5 years except for the MRC CHART Trial, which did not use concurrent chemotherapy. Although the time to development of mandibular osteoradionecrosis appears to be around 27 months (range, 3–129 months),14 the time to development of cervical osteoradionecrosis is not well recognized in the literature. From the cases reviewed,1–6 the median time to cervical osteoradionecrosis was approximately 34 months after radiation; though the range appears to be a quite wide (0–300 months), suggesting that the risk for cervical osteoradionecrosis may potentially persist longer. Our patient, having developed osteoradionecrosis at 9 years, is in line with the previously published reports.
Table 2.
Case studies by Kosako et al6
| Author | Cancer histology/primary | Radiation dose (Gyfx) | Chemotherapy | ORN treatment | Time to ORN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kosako et al6 | SCC/hypopharynx | 76.8/1.2 BID | Ncoadjuvant and concurrent/cisplatin and 5FU | Surgery and antibiotics | 2.5 y |
| SCC/oropharynx | 76.8/1.6 BID | Ncoadjuvant and concurrent/cisplatin, carboplatin, and 5-FU | Antibiotics | 2.3 y | |
| SCC/esophagus and hypopharynx | 50/2 + additional 40 | Concurrent/cisplatin and 5-FU | - | 3.1 y |
5-FU, 5-flurouracil; ORN, osteoradionecrosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
It has been well documented15 that late complications from radiation therapy can be associated with slow recovery between fractions. This implies that, with 2 fractions per day and intervals of 6 hours, as used here, may be inadequate to allow complete recovery. The result of this is that the biologically effective dose for the whole schedule may be considerably larger than planned, thus increasing the possibility of late side effects. Further, this could be exacerbated by an extended schedule of 2 doses per day. The extended incomplete repair formulation described by Guttenberger et al16 was used to estimate the equivalent dose in 1.8 Gy fractions (EQD1.8) for the schedule as delivered with and without this incomplete repair assumption, using example parameters of α/β(5=0.85 Gy for osteonecrosis17 and likely repair halftime (T1/2) = 4 hours.15 Without incomplete repair, EQD1.8 = 70 Gy. Accounting for incomplete repair because of a 6-hour interfraction interval and repair T1/2 of 4 hours, EQD1.8 = an estimated 80 Gy. Had standard fractionation been used, approximately 24 hours between fractions, or 6 repair T1/2 periods would have occurred, thus there exists the possibility that using this hyperfractionated course, biologically effective doses to the affected areas could have been as high as 10%–15% greater than planned, which could explain the osteoradionecrosis seen in this case. This supports the view that 2 fractions per day in head and neck cancer should be given with caution, always maximizing the interfraction interval.
Conclusion
This patient had no signs of osteoradionecrosis until 9 years after radiation therapy. It is conceivable that radiobiologic differences attributable to accelerated fractionation radiation therapy concurrent with chemotherapy contributed to his development of osteoradionecrosis. There has been increased interest in the role of altered fractionation radiation therapy with RTOG 1016 currently exploring radiation treatment de-escalation. If this trial demonstrates a survival benefit and accelerated fractionation with chemotherapy becomes standard of care, then knowledge of the late side effects of such therapy, including osteoradionecrosis, becomes crucial.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: None.
References
- 1.Donovan DJ, Huynh TV, Purdom EB, Johnson RE, Sniezek JC. Osteoradionecrosis of the cervical spine resulting from radiotherapy for primary head and neck malignancies: Operative and nonoperative management. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3: 159–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ng RL, Beahm E, Clayman GL, Hassenbusch SJ, Miller MJ. Simultaneous reconstruction of the posterior pharyngeal wall and cervical spine with a free vascularized fibula osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109:1361–1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lim AA, Karakla DW, Watkins DV. Osteoradionecrosis of the cervical vertebrae and occipital bone: A case report and brief review of the literature. Am J Otolaryngol. 1999;20:408–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.van Wyk FC, Sharma MP, Tranter R. Osteoradionecrosis of the cervical spine presenting with quadriplegia in a patient previously treated with radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3:7262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith VA, Lentsch EJ. Life-threatening cervical spine collapse as a result of postradiation osteonecrosis—case report and review of the literature. Head Neck. 2013;35:E142–E146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kosaka Y, Okuno Y, Tagawa Y, et al. Osteoradionecrosis of the cervical vertebrae in patients irradiated for head and neck cancers. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28:388–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:24–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Trotti A, Gillison M. RTOG 1016 Protocol Information. Phase III Trial of Radiotherapy Plus Cetuximab Versus Chemoradiotherapy in HPV -Associated Oropharynx Cancer. Available at: https://www.rtog.org/ClinicalTrials/ProtocolTable/StudyDetails.aspx?study=1016. Accessed March 9, 2016.
- 9.Laszlo A, Rosset A, Hermann F, Ozsahin M, Zouhair A, Mirimanoff RO. [T.i.d. accelerated radiotherapy alone or alternating with chemotherapy in patients with a locally advanced ORL cancer: Analysis of late toxicity.] Cancer Radiother. 2001;5: 130–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xiao C, Hanlon A, Zhang Q, et al. Risk factors for clinician-reported symptom clusters in patients with advanced head and neck cancer in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial: RTOG 0129. Cancer. 2014;120:848–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mortensen HR, Overgaard J, Specht L, et al. Prevalence and peak incidence of acute and late normal tissue morbidity in the DAHANCA 6&7 randomised trial with accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saunders MI, Rojas AM, Parmar MK, Dische S, Collaborators CT. Mature results of a randomized trial of accelerated hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:3–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bourhis J, Sire C, Graff P, et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99–02): An open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:145–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gevorgyan A, Wong K, Poon I, Blanas N, Enepekides DJ, Higgins KM. Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible: A case series at a single institution. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;42:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bentzen SM, Saunders MI, Dische S. Repair halftimes estimated from observations of treatment-related morbidity after CHART or conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1999;53:219–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guttenberger R, Thames HD, Ang KK. Is the experience with CHART compatible with experimental data? A new model of repair kinetics and computer simulations. Radiother Oncol. 1992;25:280–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Withers HR, Peters LJ, Taylor JM, et al. Late normal tissue sequelae from radiation therapy for carcinoma of the tonsil: Patterns of fractionation study of radiobiology. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:563–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


