Skip to main content
Aging and Disease logoLink to Aging and Disease
. 2019 Dec 1;10(6):1199–1206. doi: 10.14336/AD.2019.0215

Genetic Spectrum and Variability in Chinese Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Zhi-Jun Liu 1,#, Hui-Xia Lin 1,2,#, Qiao Wei 1,#, Qi-Jie Zhang 2,#, Cong-Xin Chen 2, Qing-Qing Tao 1, Gong-Lu Liu 1, Wang Ni 1, Aaron D Gitler 3, Hong-Fu Li 1,*, Zhi-Ying Wu 1,*
PMCID: PMC6844596  PMID: 31788332

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive, fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by selective impairment of upper and lower motor neurons. We aimed to investigate the genetic spectrum and variability in Chinese patients with ALS. A total of 24 familial ALS (FALS) and 21 early-onset sporadic ALS (SALS) of Chinese ancestry were enrolled. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in the probands, followed by verification by Sanger sequencing and co-segregation analysis. Clinical features of patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were present. The mutation frequency of ALS-related genes was then analyzed in Chinese population. In this cohort, 17 known mutations (9 SOD1, 5 FUS, 2 TARDBP and one SETX) were identified in 14 FALS and 6 early-onset SALS. Moreover, 7 novel variants (SOD1 c.112G>C, OPTN c.811C>T, ERBB4 c.965T>A, DCTN1 c.1915C>T, NEFH c.2602G>A, NEK1 c.3622G>A, and TAF15 c.1535G>A) were identified. In southeastern Chinese FALS, the mutation frequency of SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP was 52.9%, 8.8%, 8.8% respectively. In early-onset SALS, FUS mutations were the most common (22.6%). In Chinese ALS cases, p.H47R is most frequent SOD1 mutations, while p.R521 is most common FUS mutation and p.M337V is most common TARDBP mutation. Our results revealed that mutations in SOD1, FUS and TARDBP are the most common cause of Chinese FALS, while FUS mutations are the most common cause of early-onset SALS. The genetic spectrum is different between Chinese ALS and Caucasian ALS.

Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, mutation, targeted next-generation sequencing, Chinese ancestry, genetic spectrum


Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive, fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by selective impairment of upper and lower motor neurons, with or without cognitive impairment [1]. It predominantly occurs in adulthood with irreversible course. Patients usually suffer from progressive muscle weakness and atrophy and die of respiratory failure 3-5 years after the onset. No medications can halt the progression of ALS, although Riluzole prolongs survival by several months [2]. Approximately, 5-10% of cases are familial ALS (FALS) with a Mendelian inheritance, while the remaining cases are sporadic ALS (SALS) [3]. The etiology of ALS has not been fully uncovered so far, but growing studies have revealed that genetic mutations played important roles in the pathogenesis of ALS, especially in juvenile-onset ALS [4]. In recent years, evolving technologies for gene mapping and sequencing have facilitated the identification of multiple ALS genes. To date, more than 25 genes have been implicated in ALS [5,6]. Among these genes, C9ORF72, SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP are the most common causative genes [4]. Although mutations in some ALS-linked genes have been observed worldwide, geographic variability has also been observed. For example, the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion accounts for about 40% of FALS in North America and Europe [4]. while it is rare in the Chinese ALS population [7,8]. Such discrepancies might be attributed to differences in ethnicity and haplotype background.

In this study, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) on a cohort of 24 FALS cases and 21 early-onset SALS cases from southeastern China. In addition, we integrated the previously reported ALS cases from our group and other Chinese groups to characterize the genetic spectrum of Chinese ALS patients. We summarize the mutation frequency and distribution of common ALS causative genes (SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP) in Chinese population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

A total of 24 FALS probands and 21 early-onset sporadic ALS were recruited from July 2008 to April 2017 in Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, and Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. Majority of patients were from southeastern China. Age at onset under 40 years old was defined as early-onset in this study. Of the 24 FALS cases, five cases were previously reported, but no responsible mutation was found that time [9,10]. The diagnosis of ALS was made by at least two senior neurologists. All patients fulfilled the El Escorial criteria for ALS [11]. In view of the fact that a few patients with a diagnosis of suspected ALS had predominant lower motor neuron (LMN) symptoms, we excluded the possibility of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and spinal-bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) by screening SMN1 and AR gene in all patients. This study was approved by the ethics committee at each participating center. Written consents were obtained from all participants.

Targeted sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA-treated peripheral blood using DNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genetic analysis of the hexanucleotide repeats in C9ORF72 was completed as previously described [12]. A custom panel (Roche, Madison, USA) was designed to capture and sequence the 27 well-established ALS-related genes (Supplementary table 1). All the exons and flanking regions of each gene were covered by this panel. The targeted exomes of the prepared samples were captured by NimbleGen SeqCap EZ products (Roche, Madison, USA). The targeted libraries were indexed, polled and sequenced using Illumina Hiseq2500 system (Genergy Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). Short reads were aligned to the human genome (UCSC hg19) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner v0.7.15. The calling of variants, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels, were accomplished by Genome Analysis Toolkit v3.6. Sequencing depth and coverage analyses were performed using Genome Analysis Toolkit v3.6. The called variants were filtered by Hard filtering and Variant Quality Score Recalibration, and further annotated using ANNOVAR v2016Feb01.

Variant analysis

All nonsynonymous variants covered more than 20x and within the coding and splicing regions were selected and screened with dbSNP, 1000 Genomes Project (1000G), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500), and Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Potential functional consequences of the nonsynonymous variants were evaluated by SIFT, Mutationtaster, and PolyPhen-2, and CADD. The variants known to be pathogenic to the disease in any database of NCBI ClinVar, HGMD (Human Gene Mutation Database), and ALSoD (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Online Genetics Database) were picked out for further analysis.

Sanger sequencing

Sanger sequencing was performed as previously described to verify the variants identified by targeted NGS [13]. Briefly, forward and reverse PCR primers were designed to amplify the fragments covering the variant sites. PCR products were purified with shrimp alkaline phosphatase and exonuclease and then directly sequenced on an ABI 3500xL Dx Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Co-segregation analysis was performed in the families with identified mutations.

RESULTS

Overview of demographics and clinical features

A total of 24 FALS probands (13 males; 11 females) and 21 early-onset SALS (13 males; 8 females) were included in this study. The demographic and clinical features were summarized in Table 1. All patients are of Chinese Han origin and the majority of patients were from southeastern China. Among these patients, the mean age at onset was 35.8±14.1 years (range from 7 to 65). Site of onset was upper limbs in 20 cases and lower limbs in 22 cases. Only two cases had bulbar onset and one case had abdomen onset.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical features of all ALS patients.

FALS SALS Total
Number of subjects, n 24 21 45
M/F, n 13/11 13/8 26/19
M/F ratio 1.2 1.6 1.4
Age of onset, mean ± SD (y)
M 34.5±13.1 30.4±13.5 32.4±13.2
F 47.1±14.1 31.3±8.1 40.4±14.2
Total 40.3±14.8 30.7±11.5 35.8±14.1
Site of onset, n
Upper limbs 9 11 20
Lower limbs 13 9 22
Chest/abdomen 1 0 1
Bulbar 1 1 2

Targeted sequencing of ALS patient samples

Among the 45 subjects recruited to our study, we subjected each DNA sample to next generation sequencing (NGS). An average of 93.25% target regions were sequenced with at least 30x coverage, and 86.18% target regions with 50x coverage. The mean coverage of the target regions per sample was 179.73. After filtering, a total of 29 different variants including 17 known pathogenic variants and 7 novel variants were identified (Table 2 and 3). All these variants were verified by Sanger sequencing.

Table 2.

The known pathogenic variants of ALS-related gene identified in this study.

Gene Nucleotide change Amino acid change Index cases (family history)
SOD1 c.13G>T p.A5S 1 (Yes)
SOD1 c.14C>T p.A5V 1 (Yes)
SOD1 c.32G>T p.G11V 1 (Yes)
SOD1 c.49G>T p.G17C 1 (Yes)
SOD1 c.140A>G p.H47R 2 (Yes)
SOD1 c.251A>G p.D84G 1 (Yes)
SOD1 c.319C>G p.L107V 1 (Yes)
SOD1 c.363T>G p.H121Q 2 (Yes)
SOD1 c.449T>C p.I150T 1 (Yes)
FUS c.1483C>T p.R495X 1 (Yes)
FUS c.1528A>G p.K510E 1 (No)
FUS c.1561C>T p.R521C 1 (No)
FUS c.1562G>A p.R521H 1 (Yes)
FUS c.1574C>T p.P525L 2 (No)
TARDBP c.1009A>G p.M337V 1 (Yes)
TARDBP c.1069G>A p.G357S 1 (No)
SETX c.1504C>T p.R502W 1 (No)

Table 3.

The novel variants of ALS-related genes identified in this study.

Gene Mutation 1000G ESP6500 ExAC SIFT Mutation Taster Polyphen-2 CADD ACMG
SOD1 c.112G>C (p.G38R) 0 0 0 Damaging Disease causing Probably damaging Damaging P(PS1+PM1+PM2+PP2+PP3)
OPTN c.811C>T (p.R271C) 0 0 1.65E-05 Tolerable Polymorphism Benign Damaging VUS (PM2)
ERBB4 c.965T>A (p.M322K) 0 0 0 Tolerable Disease causing Benign Tolerable VUS (PM1+PM2+PP2)
DCTN1 c.1915C>T (p.R639W) 0 0 4.99E-05 Damaging Disease causing Probably damaging Damaging VUS (PM1+PM2+PP3)
NEFH c.2602G>A (p.E868K) 0 0 0 Tolerable Disease causing Probably damaging Tolerable VUS (PM2+PP3+BP1)
NEK1 c.3622G>A (p.D1208N) 0 0 1.06E-04 Damaging Disease causing Probably damaging Damaging VUS (PM2)
TAF15 c.1535G>A (p.R512Q) 0 7.7E-05 9.15E-05 Damaging Disease causing Probably damaging Damaging VUS

Abbreviations: 1000G= 1000 Genomes Project; ESP6500= NHLBI exome sequencing project; ExAC= Exome Aggregation Consortium.

Seventeen known pathogenic variants were identified

We assessed the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion by repeat-primed PCR, resulting in negative findings in all samples, consistent with the paucity of C9ORF72 mutation carriers in the Chinese ALS population [8]. A total of 17 known pathogenic variants, including 9 SOD1 mutations (c.13G>T, c.14C>T, c.32G>T, c.49G>T, c.140A>G, c.251A>G, c.319C>G, c.363T>G and c.449T>C), 5 FUS mutations (c.1483C>T, c.1528A>G, c.1561C>T, c.1562G>A, and c.1574C>T), 2 TARDBP mutations (c.1009A>G and c.1069G>A), and one SETX mutation (c.1504C>T), were identified in 14 FALS cases and 6 early-onset sporadic cases (Table 2). In addition, we detected a previously reported SETX variant (c.4660T>G, p.C1554G) in a sporadic case. This variant was documented in a few studies with controversial pathogenicity [14-16]. The frequency of this variant is 0.0058 in 1000G, 0.0032 in ESP6500, and 0.0058 in ExAC. Co-segregation analysis revealed that this variant was also present in the patient’s unaffected mother and younger brother. Therefore, this variant seems unlikely to be pathogenic.

Seven novel variants were identified in ALS-related genes

In addition, we identified 7 novel variants in 7 unrelated ALS cases, including 5 FALS and two early-onset SALS (Table 3). All these variants were absent or with low frequency in 1000G, ESP6500, and ExAC. Of these variants, one SOD1 variants (c.112G>C) were identified in one FALS cases. The mutation was absent in 1000G, ESP6500, ExAC, and our 200 controls. In addition, it was predicted to be deleterious by SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Mutation Taster, and CADD. Then, another SOD1 mutation (c.112G>A) has been reported to be pathogenic (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/). According to ACMG standards, this variant was classified as pathogenic. Six variants (OPTN c.811C>T, ERBB4 c.965T>A, DCTN1 c.1915C>T, NEFH c.2602G>A, NEK1 c.3622G>A, and TAF15 c.1535G>A) of uncertain significance were identified in four FALS patients and two early-onset SALS patients. In addition, a novel variant (c.-34C>A) in a noncoding region of FUS was identified in a sporadic case.

Altogether, 17 known pathogenic variants and one novel pathogenic variant was detected in 15 FALS cases and 6 SALS cases. In addition, 6 variants of uncertain significance were detected in four FALS cases and two early-onset SALS cases. In total, 19 of 24 (79.2%) FALS and 8 of 21 (38.1%) early-onset SALS cases were identified to carry variants of ALS-related genes, while no variant was detected in the remaining cases.

Clinical features of the patients carrying pathogenic variants

The clinical features of the patients carrying pathogenic variants or likely pathogenic variants are summarized in Table 4. The average age at onset is 37.81 ± 15.20 years, ranging from 13 to 65 years. Among the 21 patients carrying mutations, 19 cases presented with limb-onset symptoms, one case exhibited bulbar onset, and the other one initially developed weakness of abdominal muscles. Only one patient carrying a FUS p.K510E mutation exhibited cognitive decline four months after disease onset.

Table 4.

The clinical features of the patients carrying pathogenic variants or likely pathogenic variants.

Patients Mutation Family
history
Gender Age at onset (y) Site of onset Disease duration (m) Age of
death (y)
Predominant features
1 SOD1: c.13G>T Yes M 29 LL >4 alive LMN dominance
2 SOD1: c.14C>T Yes F 60 UL 15 61 Classical ALS
3 SOD1: c.32G>T Yes F 25 LL >10 alive Classical ALS
4 SOD1: c.49G>T Yes M 49 Abdomen 38 52 LMN dominance
5 SOD1: c.112G>C Yes M 26 LL >120 alive LMN dominance; slow progression
6 SOD1: c.140A>G Yes F 60 UL >180 alive LMN; very slow progression
7 SOD1: c.140A>G Yes M 53 LL >21 alive LMN dominance
8 SOD1: c.251A>G Yes M 32 LL >29 alive LMN dominance; slow progression
9 SOD1: c.319C>G Yes M 41 LL >8 alive Classical ALS
10 SOD1: c.363T>G Yes F 42 LL 51 46 LMN dominance
11 SOD1: c.363T>G Yes F 60 LL 27 62 Classical ALS
12 SOD1: c.449T>C Yes F 36 LL 12 37 Classical ALS
13 FUS: c.1483C>T Yes M 25 LL 9 26 Fast progression
14 FUS: c.1528A>G No M 26 UL >14 alive LMN dominance; cognitive decline
15 FUS: c.1561C>T No M 30 LL 41 33 LMN dominance
16 FUS: c.1562G>A Yes F 36 UL >16 alive Classical ALS; dropped head syndrome
17 FUS: c.1574C>T No F 13 LL >40 alive Classical ALS
18 FUS: c.1574C>T No M 24 UL >27 alive Classical ALS
19 TARDBP: c.1009A>G Yes M 44 Bulbar >156 alive LMN dominance; slow progression
20 TARDBP: c.1069G>A No M 65 UL >24 alive Classical ALS
21 SETX: c.1504C>T No M 18 LL >84 alive LMN dominance; slow progression

Abbreviations: M=male; F=female; LL= lower limb; UL=upper limb; LMN=lower motor neuron; ALS=amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

In the current study, 50% (12/24) of FALS cases carried SOD1 mutations, including 9 known pathogenic variants (p.A5S, p.A5V, p.G11V, p.G17C, p.H47R, p.N84G, p.L107V, p.H121Q and p.I150T) and one novel pathogenic variant (c.112G>C, p.G38R). The average age of onset of SOD1 mutation carriers was 42.75?±?13.44 years. The site of onset in SOD1 mutation carriers was in the lower limbs (75%, n=9), upper limbs (16.7%, n=2), and abdominal muscle (8.3%, n=1). These patients typically presented with dominant lower motor neuron signs. Interestingly, slow progression was significantly observed in the patients carrying SOD1 p.G38R, p.H47R, or p.D84G mutations.

Additionally, we found 5 known FUS mutations (p.R495X, p.K510E, p.R521C, p.R521H, and p.P525L) in two FALS cases and four SALS cases. The average age at onset in patients with FUS mutations was 25.67?±?7.61 years; significantly lower than that in patients with SOD1 mutations. The patients carrying p.R521C or p.R521H mutation manifested predominant lower motor neuron signs. Interestingly, neck and proximal muscle weakness which usually occurs in p.R521C mutation carriers was also observed in our patient with p.R521H mutation. In line with previous reports [17-19], the patient with the p.R495X mutation showed an early-onset and rapid disease progression.

Moreover, we detected two known TARDBP mutations, p.M337V and p.G357S. The patient with p.M337V mutation exhibited onset of bulbar symptoms, while the patient with p.G357S had spine onset. Interestingly, we identified a known SETX variant (p.R502W) in a SALS patient, who predominantly presented muscle weakness and atrophy of proximal lower limbs and exhibited a slowly progressive disease course without any evidence of upper motor neuron signs.

Genetic spectrum in our ALS patients from southeastern China

We previously reported 10 unrelated FALS patients with mutations identified in SOD1 (4 mutations/6 patients), TARDBP (2/2), DCTN1 (1/1), and FUS (1/1) [9,10,20,21]. As shown in Figure 1A, when integrating these results into the current study, we found 85.3% (29/34) of FALS carried mutation. SOD1 mutations were the most common (18/34, 52.9%) in our FALS cases, followed by FUS (3/34, 8.8%) and TARDBP (3/34, 8.8%) mutations. Despite being an uncommon cause, DCTN1 mutations were identified in 2.9% (1/34) of FALS patients. However, 11.8% (4/34) of FALS cases carried a variant of unknown significance and 14.7% (5/34) of FALS patients were not identified potential pathogenic variants. In addition, we identified three FUS mutations in four SALS cases and one TARDBP mutation in one SALS case. Integrating our previously reported three FUS mutations in 3 of 10 juvenile-onset SALS cases [20], we found the frequency for FUS mutation and TARDBP mutation in early-onset SALS were 22.6% (7/31) and 3.2% (1/31), respectively. Also, one SETX mutation was detected in one SALS patient and two variants of uncertain significance were detected in two SALS cases. In total, 35.5% (11/31) of early-onset SALS patients were identified to carry potential pathogenic variants whereas the remaining 64.5% (20/31) of SALS patients were not.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mutation spectrum of ALS-linked genes in our ALS cohort and Chinese ALS patients. (A) In our ALS cohort, the mutation frequency of SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and DCTN1 in FALS was 52.9%, 8.8%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively. FUS mutations were the most common cause of early-onset SALS (25.8%), while 61.3% of the cases were not identified pathogenic mutations. (B) The mutation frequency of FUS in Chinese ALS cases. (C) The mutation frequency of TARDBP in Chinese ALS cases. (D) The mutation frequency of SOD1 in Chinese ALS cases.

Mutation frequency of common ALS genes in Chinese population

To analyze mutation frequency and distribution of common ALS causative genes (SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP) in Chinese population, we reviewed the published genetic reports on Chinese ALS patients. In total, 36 additional studies reporting mutations of SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP in Chinese ALS patients were analyzed. As shown in Supplementary table 2, a total of 73 different SOD1 mutations were reported in Chinese ALS patients (Fig. 1B). Among these mutations, p.H47R was detected in 14 unrelated patients, representing the most frequent SOD1 mutation in Chinese ALS patients. In addition, SOD1 mutations p.G42D, p.L107F, and p.C112Y are prevalent. The most common SOD1 mutations in North America (p.A5V) and worldwide (p.D91A) were rare in Chinese ALS patients. A total of 15 FUS mutations including 6 indels, 8 missense mutations and one nonsense mutation were reported in Chinese ALS patients (Fig. 1C). The p.R521 mutation (including p.R521G, p.R521H, p.R521L and p.R521C) was found in 9 unrelated ALS patients, representing the most frequent FUS mutation in Chinese ALS patients. In addition, 10 TARDBP missense mutations were reported in Chinese ALS patients (Fig. 1D), all of which were located in exon 6. Of these TARDBP mutations, p.M337V seems to be a high frequency mutation in Chinese ALS patients. In early-onset SALS, 5 cases with SOD1 mutations, 16 cases with FUS mutations, and one case with TARDBP mutation had been described.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we performed targeted NGS and Sanger sequencing in a Chinese cohort of 24 FALS cases and 21 early-onset SALS cases. In total, we identified 17 known pathogenic variants and a novel SOD1 pathogenic variants (c.112G>C) in 15 FALS cases and 6 early-onset SALS cases. In addition, 6 variants of uncertain significance were identified in four FALS cases and two SALS cases. The pathogenicity of these 6 novel variants remains to be determined. When integrating our previously reported ALS cases with mutation [9,10,20,21], we found that 85.3% (29/34) of FALS carried mutations of ALS-linked genes. However, we failed to detect pathogenic mutations in the majority (64.5%, 20/31) of early-onset SALS cases. Among these mutation carriers, SOD1 mutation was the most common cause of FALS, which is consistent with previous studies [22,23,24,25]. FUS mutation accounted for the most frequent in the early-onset SALS cases. Previous studies of Chinese SALS which included patients with a wide range of age of onset indicated that FUS mutations are also the most frequent cause of SALS, but the frequency of FUS mutation in SALS is lower than that in early-onset SALS (25.8%), ranging from 1.7% to 1.9% [23,24]. However, none FUS mutations was identified in the cohorts of SALS from central-southern and northern China [25, 26]. Of note, no C9ORF72 repeat expansion were identified in our cohort, further supporting the finding that C9ORF72 mutation is rare in the Chinese population [8].

As the first causative gene for ALS, SOD1 mutations are very common in both FALS (20%) and SALS (1~2%) [27]. To date, more than 185 SOD1 mutations have been described worldwide and p.D91A (previously described as p.D90A) is the most common one [28]. However, this mutation was reported in only one Chinese ALS case [23]. Another mutation p.A5V (previously described as p.A4V), which accounts for up to 50% of SOD1 mutations in North America, is rarely described in Chinese ALS cases [29]. Moreover, it is reported that the p.A5V mutation carrier did not share the common founder effect observed in North America [29]. In contrast, p.H47R was the most common SOD1 mutation in Chinese ALS cases, which is similar to that in Japan [30]. In addition, p.G42D, p.L107F, and p.C112Y, were more frequent than other mutations. These results imply that the mutation spectrum of SOD1 was different between Chinese ALS and Caucasian ALS. In regard to the clinical features, cognitive impairment and bulbar onset was not common in Chinese patients with SOD1 mutations, which is consistent with previous reports [30]. However, phenotypic heterogeneity was observed not only in cases with different SOD1 mutations, but also in familial members with the same SOD1 mutation.

Compared to the high frequency of SOD1 mutations in Chinese FALS cases, FUS mutations were not common. However, FUS remains the most frequent genetic determinant of early-onset SALS. Previous study in China demonstrated that mutations in the FUS are the most frequent genetic cause in juvenile SALS (age of onset < 25 years) of Chinese origin [31]. This is consistent with our results. The frequency of FUS mutations in early-onset SALS is similar between Chinese and Caucasian population [32]. Of note, over half of FUS mutations in Chinese cases were frameshift mutations. Age at onset is young in most of the cases, and most of FUS mutation carriers manifested predominant lower motor neuron symptoms and a rapid disease progression. In addition, 9 mutations located in exon 6 of TARDBP were reported in ALS patients of Chinese ancestry and p.M337V seems to be the most common one, implying TARDBP is one of the major causative genes in Chinese ALS cases.

In summary, we investigated the genetic mutations in a Chinese cohort with ALS and characterize the genetic spectrum of Chinese ALS. Our results revealed that SOD1 mutations are the most common cause of Chinese FALS, followed by TARDBP, FUS and DCTN1. FUS mutations remained the most frequent genetic determinant of Chinese early-onset SALS. In the future, it will be interesting to explore the basis for variability in mutation frequencies between Chinese ALS and Caucasian ALS.

Supplementary Materials

The Supplemenantry data can be found online at: www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2019.0215.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the participants for their help and willingness to participate in this study. This work was supported by the grants (81671245, 81125009) to Zhi-Ying Wu from the National Natural Science Foundation, and the research foundation for distinguished scholar of Zhejiang University to Zhi-Ying Wu (188020-193810101/089, Hangzhou).

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  • [1].van Es MA, Hardiman O, Chio A, et al. (2017). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet, 390: 2084-2098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Meininger V (1994). A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ALS/Riluzole Study Group. N Engl J Med, 330: 585-591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Forbes RB, Colville S, Swingler RJ, Scottish ALSMNDR (2004). The epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS/MND) in people aged 80 or over. Age Ageing, 33: 131-134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Renton AE, Chio A, Traynor BJ (2014). State of play in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genetics. Nat Neurosci, 17: 17-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Peters OM, Ghasemi M, Brown RH Jr (2015). Emerging mechanisms of molecular pathology in ALS. J Clin Invest, 125: 2548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Therrien M, Dion PA, Rouleau GA (2016). ALS: Recent Developments from Genetics Studies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 16: 59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Chen L, Zhang B, Chen R, et al. (2015). Natural history and clinical features of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in China. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 86: 1075-1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].He J, Tang L, Benyamin B, et al. (2015). C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions in Chinese sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging, 36: 2660 e2661-2668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Liu ZJ, Li HF, Tan GH, et al. (2014). Identify mutation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cases using HaloPlex target enrichment system. Neurobiol Aging, 35: 2881 e2811-2881 e2815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Xiong HL, Wang JY, Sun YM, et al. (2010). Association between novel TARDBP mutations and Chinese patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. BMC Med Genet, 11: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL, World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron D (2000). El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord, 1: 293-299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, et al. (2011). Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron, 72: 245-256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Dong Y, Ni W, Chen WJ, et al. (2016). Spectrum and Classification of ATP7B Variants in a Large Cohort of Chinese Patients with Wilson's Disease Guides Genetic Diagnosis. Theranostics, 6: 638-649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Arning L, Epplen JT, Rahikkala E, Hendrich C, Ludolph AC, Sperfeld AD (2013). The SETX missense variation spectrum as evaluated in patients with ALS4-like motor neuron diseases. Neurogenetics, 14: 53-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Hirano M, Quinzii CM, Mitsumoto H, et al. (2011). Senataxin mutations and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler, 12: 223-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Nishiyama A, Niihori T, Warita H, et al. (2017). Comprehensive targeted next-generation sequencing in Japanese familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging, 53: 194 e191-194 e198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Waibel S, Neumann M, Rabe M, Meyer T, Ludolph AC (2010). Novel missense and truncating mutations in FUS/TLS in familial ALS. Neurology, 75: 815-817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Waibel S, Neumann M, Rosenbohm A, et al. (2013). Truncating mutations in FUS/TLS give rise to a more aggressive ALS-phenotype than missense mutations: a clinico-genetic study in Germany. Eur J Neurol, 20: 540-546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Yan J, Deng HX, Siddique N, et al. (2010). Frameshift and novel mutations in FUS in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and ALS/dementia. Neurology, 75: 807-814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Liu ZJ, Lin HX, Liu GL, et al. (2017). The investigation of genetic and clinical features in Chinese patients with juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Genet, 92: 267-273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Niu YF, Xiong HL, Wu JJ, Chen Y, Qiao K, Wu ZY (2011). [Screening of mutations in SOD1 gene and analysis of genotype-phenotype correlation in Chinese patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis]. Yi Chuan, 33: 720-724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Tsai CP, Soong BW, Lin KP, Tu PH, Lin JL, Lee YC (2011). FUS, TARDBP, and SOD1 mutations in a Taiwanese cohort with familial ALS. Neurobiol Aging, 32:553 e13-e21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Zou ZY, Liu MS, Li XG, Cui LY (2016). The distinctive genetic architecture of ALS in mainland China. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 87: 906-907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Liu Q, Liu F, Cui B, et al. (2016). Mutation spectrum of Chinese patients with familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 87:1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Hou L, Jiao B, Xiao T, et al. (2016). Screening of SOD1, FUS and TARDBP genes in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in central-southern China. Sci Rep, 6:32478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Zhang H, Cai W, Chen S, et al. (2018). Screening for possible oligogenic pathogenesis in Chinese sporadic ALS patients. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener, 19:419-425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Baumer D, Talbot K, Turner MR (2014). Advances in motor neurone disease. J R Soc Med, 107: 14-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Li HF, Wu ZY (2016). Genotype-phenotype correlations of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Transl Neurodegener, 5: 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Tang L, Ma Y, Liu X, Chen L, Fan D (2018). Identification of an A4V SOD1 mutation in a Chinese patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis without the A4V founder effect common in North America. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener, 19: 466-468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Yamashita S, Ando Y (2015). Genotype-phenotype relationship in hereditary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Transl Neurodegener, 4: 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Zou ZY, Liu MS, Li XG, Cui LY (2016). Mutations in FUS are the most frequent genetic cause in juvenile sporadic ALS patients of Chinese origin. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener, 17: 249-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Hubers A, Just W, Rosenbohm A, et al. (2015). De novo FUS mutations are the most frequent genetic cause in early-onset German ALS patients. Neurobiol Aging, 36: 3117 e3111-3117 e3116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Aging and Disease are provided here courtesy of JKL International LLC

RESOURCES