Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transl Res. 2019 Aug 13;214:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.07.007

siRNA- and miRNA-Based Therapeutics for Liver Fibrosis

Zhen Zhao 1, Chien-Yu Lin 1, Kun Cheng 1,*
PMCID: PMC6848786  NIHMSID: NIHMS1537386  PMID: 31476281

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a wound-healing process induced by chronic liver injuries, such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatitis, alcohol abuse, and metal poisoning. The accumulation of excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) in the liver is a key characteristic of liver fibrosis. Activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are the major producers of ECM and therefore play irreplaceably important roles during the progression of liver fibrosis. Liver fibrogenesis is highly correlated with the activation of HSCs, which is regulated by numerous profibrotic cytokines. Using RNA interference (RNAi) to downregulate these cytokines in activated HSCs is a promising strategy to reverse liver fibrosis. Meanwhile, microRNAs (miRNAs) have also been exploited for the treatment of liver fibrosis. This review focuses on the current siRNA- and miRNA-based liver fibrosis treatment strategies by targeting activated HSCs in the liver.

Keywords: Liver fibrosis, siRNA, hepatic stellate cells, ECM, cytokines, microRNA

Introduction

Liver fibrosis is a wound-healing process induced by chronic liver injury caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatitis, alcohol abuse, and metal poisoning. The accumulation of excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) in the liver is a key characteristic of liver fibrosis [1, 2]. Although liver fibrosis is reversible, but if not treated, it develops to liver cirrhosis, which is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. According to an epidemiology study of cirrhosis in the United States, approximately 0.27% of American adults are affected by liver cirrhosis [3]. To date, the only effective treatment for liver cirrhosis is liver transplantation, which is highly restricted by the availability and suitability of liver grafts [4]. Therefore, development of effective treatments for liver fibrosis is critical in preventing the progression to liver cirrhosis. Several antifibrotic agents, such as candesartan (), cenicriviroc (), tropifexor (LJN452, ) and pegbelfermin (BMS-986036, , ) are currently in clinical trials [57].

In the process of liver fibrogenesis, HSCs play an important role as the major producers of ECM, although HSCs only constitute 5–8% of total liver cells [8, 9]. HSCs can be activated by numerous factors [10], and the activation process includes two stages: initiation and perpetuation, starting from changes in gene expression to the changes in proliferation and fibrogenesis [11]. Cytokines, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) secreted from Kupffer cells and endothelial cells regulate the proliferation of HSCs in a paracrine manner and promote their survival when the liver is injured [12, 13]. Once transdifferentiated to an activated myofibroblast-like phenotype, HSCs exhibit more migration and proliferation and less apoptosis with high expressions of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and ECM [10]. The expression of ECM increases more than 50-fold when quiescent HSCs are activated into myofibroblast-like cells [1, 1416]. Based on the important role of activated HSCs during the progression of liver fibrosis, inhibiting the activation of HSCs either by reversing the activation phenotype to quiescent cells or driving activated HSCs to apoptosis can be an effective strategy for the resolution of liver fibrosis [17].

RNA interference (RNAi) is a relatively new technology to specifically knockdown target genes using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of 21–23 nucleotides [11, 1822]. Once transfected into target cells, double-strand siRNAs are separated by an ATP-dependent helicase, and the functional antisense strands are further incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and subsequently guide the RISC to specifically bind and degrade target mRNAs[19]. In early 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a lipid nanoparticle-formulated siRNA (Patisiran) as the first siRNA drug to treat hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis. A number of siRNA-based therapies are now in clinical trials, and one of them is the lipid nanoparticle containing HSP47 siRNA for the treatment of liver fibrosis () [23].

During the progression of liver fibrosis, numerous membrane receptor signaling pathways, nuclear receptor signaling pathways, and transcription factors are dysregulated in HSCs [10]. Because of its high specificity and potency to downregulate genes that are associated with liver fibrogenesis, siRNA is a type of promising therapeutic agent to reverse liver fibrogenesis [17, 24]. Table 1 summarizes the siRNA-based antifibrotic therapeutics that have been investigated since the discovery of RNAi. However, the highly negative charge and large molecular weight (~14 kDa) of siRNA limit its therapeutic application in vivo [25]. In previous decades, different siRNA delivery systems have been developed, including cationic liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and micelles, to carry anti-fibrotic siRNA to activated HSCs [17]. Moreover, due to the reduced perisinusoidal space and flow exchange in the fibrotic liver, ligands that can specifically target activated HSCs have also been discovered to enhance the delivery of siRNA to fibrotic liver [18]. Please refer to a recently published review for more details about HSCspecific ligands [26]. For example, using a novel biopanning strategy, a high-affinity peptide (peptide-431) was discovered to specifically target the highly expressed insulin-like growth factor II receptor (IGFIIR) on activated HSCs [27]. Using the peptide-431, Zhao et al. developed a peptide-modified siRNA nanocomplex to specifically deliver an anti-fibrotic siRNA to fibrotic liver [18].

Table 1.

siRNA for the treatment of liver fibrosis in vivo

Target pathway Target protein siRNA Animal model Reference
collagens collagen α1(I) procollagen α1(I) siRNA CCl4/mice 30,31,32
collagens TANGO1 TANGO1 siRNA CCl4, bile duct ligation/murine 33
collagens HSP47 gp46 siRNA DMN/rat 34
collagens αCP2 PCBP2 siRNA CCl4/rat 38

TGF-β TGF-β1 TGF-β1 siRNA CCl4, high-fat diet/mice, rat 41, 54,55
TGF-β Gremlin 1 Gremlin 1 siRNA CCl4/rat 60
TGF-β BMP-9 BMP-9 shRNA CCl4/mice 63
TGF-β TRPM7 TRPM7 siRNA CCl4/rat 64
TGF-β Hic-5 Hic-5 siRNA CCl4, bile duct ligation/mice 69

PDGF PDGFR-β PDGFR-β siRNA DMN, bile ductligation/rat 84

MMPs and TIMPs TIMP-1 TIMP-1 shRNA CCl4, bile duct ligation/rat 90,92
MMPs and TIMPs TIMP-1, CTGF TIMP-1shRNA, CTGF shRNA DMN/rat 93
MMPs and TIMPs TIMP-2 TIMP-2 siRNA CCl4/rat 96

PI3K/Akt signaling Tβ4 Tβ4 siRNA bile duct ligation/rat 99
PI3K/Akt signaling ELF ELF siRNA CCl4/mice 100
PI3K/Akt signaling PlGF PlGF siRNA CCl4/mice 101
PI3K/Akt signaling GRB2 GRB2 siRNA CCl4/rat 102

NF-κB pathway RAGE RAGE siRNA CCl4/rat 109
NF-κB pathway NLRC5 NLRC5 siRNA CCl4/mice 110

Collagens

The excessively accumulated ECM caused by overexpression and reduced degradation is the key characteristic of liver fibrosis[1]. The ECM consists of different types of collagens, glycoproteins, proteoglycans and glycoaminoglycans [28]. In activated HSCs, type I collagen is the most abundant component of ECM and is produced by the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes[28]. Two COL1A1 gene-generated pro-α1(I) chains combine with one COL1A2 gene-generated proα2(I) chain to form a rope-like, triple-stranded pro-collagen, which is secreted by HSCs and then enzymatically processed and cross-linked to form stable type I collagen fibers [28]. In normal liver, collagens engage in a constant flux of remolding via a balance between synthesis and degradation by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In fibrotic liver, the expression of collagens is upregulated by the SMAD and p38 MAPK signaling pathways [28, 29]. Pro-fibrogenic cytokines such as IL-4/IL-13 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) upregulate the expression of the COL1A1 gene. Additionally, the activity of MMPs was inhibited by tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs), resulting in excessively accumulated ECM [17, 28, 29].

Using siRNA to directly regulate collagen expression in HSCs has been proven to resolve liver fibrosis in vivo and in vitro[3032]. Calvente and colleagues developed a lipid-like nanoparticle to deliver COL1A1 siRNA and found that type I collagen expression was significantly inhibited in human HSC cell line LX-2 and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced fibrotic liver in mice without inducing innate immunity responses [30]. Moreover, a vitamin Acoupled lipid-like nanoparticle was developed to carry COL1A1 siRNA, which significant inhibited collagen production without any severe adverse effects at a 3 mg siRNA/kg dose[31]. Kaps et al. also developed a cationic nanohydrogel particle to deliver COL1A1 siRNA for the treatment of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in a mice model [32]. These cationic nanohydrogel particles significantly knocked down 70% of the COL1A1 mRNA in fibroblasts after 48 h of transfection in vitro and suppressed 50% of COL1A1 mRNA in the liver of fibrotic mice [32].

In addition to direct regulation of the COL1A1 gene, other proteins related to the expression of collagens, such as α-complex protein 2 (αCP2), transport and Golgi organization 1 (TANGO1), and heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) have also been investigated to resolve liver fibrosis [11, 33, 34]. The abnormal accumulation of ECM during liver fibrosis is positively correlated with an increase in the half-life of the COL1A1 mRNA from 1.5 h in quiescent HSCs to more than 24 h in activated HSCs [35, 36]. The increase in the mRNA half-life is mediated by αCP2 protein (encoded by the PCBP2 gene), which belongs to the αCP family and specifically binds to the 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR) of COL1A1 mRNA, leading to stabilization of the mRNA [37]. Shukla and colleagues recently discovered a PCBP2 siRNA and found that the expression of type I collagen in alcohol-activated HSCs was significantly reduced via PCBP2 gene knockdown (Figure 1) [37]. Moreover, downregulation of αCP2 protein in HSCs reverses alcohol-, TGF-β-, PDGF- and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced fibrogenesis in vitro [11]. Jain et al. further developed an PCBP2 siRNA/peptide nucleic acid (PNA) hybrid nanocomplex and efficiently reversed CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in a rat model [38].

Figure 1: Mechanism for PCBP2 siRNA for liver fibrosis treatment.

Figure 1:

Quiescent HSCs in normal liver are activated by profibrotic cytokines, including TGF-β, PDGF, CTGF, TNFA, and transdifferentiated to myofibroblast-like cells. αCP2 protein is overexpressed during liver fibrogenesis and stabilizes the COL1A1 mRNA, leading to accumulation of type I collagen in the liver. PCBP2 siRNA specific silences the expression of αCP2, reduces the half-life of the COL1A1 mRNA, and reverses the accumulated type I collagen in fibrotic liver.

HSP47 is a collagen-specific chaperone protein, which assists the proper triple-helix formulation of procollagen in the endoplasmic reticulum to facilitates the secretion of collagen [34, 39]. Sato et al. developed a vitamin A-coupled liposome to deliver an siRNA targeting gp46, the rat homology of HSP47, to resolve liver cirrhosis in dimethylnitrosamine (DMN)-treated rats [34]. TANGO1 is another type I collagen secretion-related protein, which is upregulated by TGF-β in murine and human cirrhotic liver tissues [33]. Specific knockdown of the TANGO1 gene with siRNA led to retention of type I procollagen in the endoplasmic reticulum, promoting unfolded protein response (UPR)-mediated HSC apoptosis. Silencing of the TANGO1 gene using siRNA reduces the deposition of type I collagen in human HSC cell line LX-2 and primary human HSCs, suggesting that inhibition of TANGO1 is a promising antifibrotic therapy [33].

TGF-β

The TGF-β superfamily contains a large number of functional proteins, including activins, inhibins, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), growth differentiation factors, and glial-derived neurotrophic factors [40]. Among them, the TGF-β family members TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3 have been found to be related to fibrotic diseases, especially liver fibrosis [4042]. They were identified in all phases of the development of chronic liver injury including hepatocyte apoptosis and HSCs activation [43]. TGF-βs produced in Kupffer cells, endothelial cells and HSCs can bind to their receptors (TβR1, TβR2) and regulate specific gene transcriptions in liver cells through the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway (canonical pathway) [40, 43]) to induce HSC activation, proliferation, and migration; induce collagen expression; and inhibit HSC apoptosis and ECM degradation [40, 4447]. These TGF-βs and activins induce the expression of different collagens, including COL1A1, COL3A1, COL5A2, COL6A1, COL6A3 and COL7A1 via mediation of SMAD-2/3 transcription factors [48, 49]. Meanwhile, BMPs act as anti-fibrotic mediators via SMAD-1/5/8 transcription factors to suppress TGF-β-induced fibrotic gene expression [50]. TGF-β1 drives ECM-related gene expression via the SMAD-2/3 axis and is accumulated itself during liver fibrogenesis [48, 51]. Similar to TGF-β1, TGF-β2 displays fibrotic activity via the SMAD-2/3 axis [52]. Activins promote the proliferation and differentiation of fibroblasts and the accumulation of ECM[53]. Antagonists of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 could be potentially used as antifibrotic agents [49, 54]. Direct knockdown TGF-β1 using siRNA has been reported to significantly decrease α-SMA and type I collagen expression in HSC-T6 cells and exerted antifibrotic effects in CCl4-induced mice and rats [42, 55, 56]. In addition, silencing TβR2 with a short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) also inhibited the activation of HSCs and reduced the expression of collagens [57].

Unlike the pro-fibrotic function of the SMAD-2/3 pathway, the SMAD-1/5/8 axis exhibited an anti-fibrotic effect activated by BMPs (BMP canonical pathway)[49, 58]. BMPs were first identified to induce bone and cartilage formation and further discovered to have multiple functions in the liver regenerative response [58, 59]. Among all the activators, BMP-7 counteracts the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway by increasing the phosphorylation of the SMAD-1/5/8 axis through the type I receptor (activin-like kinase3, ALK3), which is another negative fibrosis regulator[60]. Due to the exhibited opposite effect between TGF-β1 and BMP-7 during the progression of liver fibrosis, induced BMP-7 expression through a recombinant adenovirus vector showed an anti-fibrotic effect in rat and human HSCs and in a thioacetamide-induced fibrotic rat model [61]. Gremlin 1 is a target protein that is upregulated along with TGF-β1 expression, phosphorylates SMAD2/3 in TGF-β signaling and is an antagonist of BMP-7[62]. Using siRNA to knockdown gremlin1 can suppress HSC activation and attenuate liver fibrosis in a CCl4-induced rat model [62]. In addition, the miR-23b/27b cluster can also downregulate the expression of gremlin 1 to suppress HSC activation[62]. BMP-9 is another member of the BMP family that has been found to be overexpressed in liver fibrosis patients [63]. Li et al. reported that BMP-9 activates HSCs through the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway and that the specific silencing of BMP-9 expression using shRNA can attenuate the process of liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced mice model[63].

Due to the complex role of TGF-β in the liver, blocking the TGF-β/TβR upstream interaction using small molecular inhibitors such as galunisertib (LY2157299), TGF-β antibodies, or TGF-β oligonucleotides may increase inflammation in the liver and other organs because of TGF-β1’s general anti-inflammatory property and the ubiquitous expression of TGF-β1 and its receptors in the body [40, 43, 49]. By contrast, specific targeting of downstream mediators of TGF-β signaling in HSCs using siRNA or miRNA can be a promising therapeutic strategy for liver fibrosis [40]. For example, transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) is a cation channel protein related to the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway and plays important functions in the proliferation of HSCs [64]. Blockade of TRPM7 with an inhibitor (2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, 2-APB) can decrease the expression of α-SMA and COL1A1. Similarly, silencing TRPM7 using siRNA promotes the degradation of collagens by increasing MMP-13 and impedes the phosphorylation of SMAD2/3 in activated HSCs in vitro and in vivo[64]. Histone deacetylase 2(HDAC2) is another protein found to be upregulated in TGF-β1-treated HSCs or CCl4-induced fibrotic liver tissues. Specific knockdown of the expression of HDAC2 using siRNA can decrease the α-SMA and COL1A1 expression levels in TGF-β1-treated HSC-T6 cells [65]. Nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptors CARD domain containing 5 (NLRC5) is a member of the NLR family and has been reported to be a negative regulator of the inflammatory pathway that is upregulated during the progression of liver fibrosis. NLRC5 is a potent profibrogenic molecule, which is upregulated in fibrotic liver and results in to accumulation of collagen and α-SMA in HSCs [66]. Knockdown of NLRC5 has been reported to abrogate the phosphorylation of SMAD2/3 and significantly suppressed the proliferation of TGF-β1-treated HSCs[66]. Other upstream and downstream mediators of TGF-β/SMAD signaling, including follistatin-like 1 (Fst1), megakaryoblastic leukemia 1 (MKL1), and hydrogen peroxide-inducible clone-5 (Hic-5, Tgfb1i1), have also been found to be overexpressed in activated HSCs, and the deficiency of these mediators by silencing with siRNAs or other gene knockout treatments can attenuate the activation of HSCs and liver fibrosis [6769].

PDGF

The PDGF family contains four different polypeptide subunits, PDGF-A, PDGF-B, PDGF-C, and PDGF-D, which function as five homo-/heterogeneous dimers (PDGF-AA, AB, BB, CC, and DD)[70, 71]. As secreted cytokines, PDGFs are primarily produced by platelets, Kupffer cells, and endothelial cells and act on neighboring mesenchymal cells in a paracrine manner[71, 72]. PDGFs regulate many physiological and pathophysiological processes and affect proliferation, migration and survival of mesenchymal and other cells [73, 74]. During the process of liver damage, the expression of the PDGF family, especially PDGF-A and -B, increases significantly in endothelial cells, macrophages and activated HSCs. In addition, PDGFB was determined to be one of the most potent factors for the activation of HSCs[75]. Matsumoto et al. demonstrated that miR-29a can promote liver fibrosis recovery in CCl4- or thioacetamide-induced mice through regulation of the mRNA expression of Col1a1 and PDGF-C [76]. The PDGF family exerts their functional actions by binding with two receptors: PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β, which belong to the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family and bind to PDGFs with three different dipolymers: PDGFR-αα, -αβ and -ββ, which are generally located in Kupffer cells, vascular endothelial cells and fibroblasts [71]. Homogeneous PDGFR-αα binds to PDGFAA, -AB, -BB, and -CC, while homogeneous PDGFR-ββ interacted with PDGF-BB and -DD. By contrast, heterogeneous dipolymer PDGFR-αβ can bind with all subunits except the -AA dimer, followed by receptor phosphorylation and signal transduction [72, 77]. PDGFRs remain at a very low level in normal liver cells but significantly upregulated in a fibrotic liver [70, 71]. Previous studies have demonstrated the biological effects of PDGF-B/-D binding with PDGFR-β for the activation of HSCs during chronic liver injury, and specifically blocking the PDGF-BB/PDGFR-ββ axis can be a potential therapeutic regimen for liver fibrosis treatment [78, 79].

Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including sorafenib, imatinib and sunitinib, which can target PDGFR-β, have been used to treat activated HSCs [71, 80, 81]. Compared to these nonselective PDGFR-β inhibitors, using gene therapy to selectively knock-down the PDGFR-β expression in activated HSCs can be another therapeutic option [79, 82, 83]. Using PDGFR-β siRNA, the activation and proliferation of HSCs in vitro and the progression of liver fibrosis in vivo were significantly suppressed [84]. Co-delivery of miR-29b1 targeting several profibrotic genes including PDGFR-β, with a small molecule hedgehog inhibitor can decrease the expression of collagen and α-SMA and has synergistic effect in the treatment of CBDL-induced mouse liver fibrosis [83]. In addition, PDGFR-α is another target for liver fibrosis treatment, not only in activated HSCs but also in injured liver hepatocytes [85]. Lim et al. reported that PDGFR-α knock-out mice exhibited decreased activation and proliferation in HSCs and attenuated the thioacetamide-induced cirrhotic liver, and the activation of LX-2 cells was suppressed by co-culture with PDGFR-α siRNA-transfected Hep3B cells [85].

Matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteases (TIMPs)

In a healthy liver, MMPs belong to a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases and play an important role in maintaining the composition of ECM [86]. There are 25 different MMPs that have been identified as being associated with the degradation of ECM in the liver, and their functions were reviewed in a recent article [87]. The balance of matrix degradation activity is regulated by MMPs and their inhibitors (TIMPs), which are both important for the progression and regression of liver fibrosis[87]. When the liver is injured, activated HSCs produce abundant amounts of type I and type III collagens and also increase the secretion of TIMPs to inhibit the degradation of ECM regulated by MMPs [86]. The hepatic expression of MMPs has been identified as being responsible for fibrogenesis and liver regression. Among them, MMP-2 and MMP-14 were highly expressed in activated HSCs and promote the migration, proliferation and activation of HSCs [86]. A MMP-2-specific siRNA was delivered by a vitamin A-coupled liposome and significantly reduced the expression of type I collagen and α-SMA in HSC-T6 cells [88].

In addition, knockdown of the expression of TIMPs in activated HSCs can be another effective strategy for fibrotic liver resolution [8993]. Among the identified 4 TIMP family members, TIMP-1 has been identified as the most relevant MMP inhibitor, which is upregulated by several cytokines during the progression of liver fibrosis [92]. Studies have also demonstrated that TIMP-1 not only prevented ECM degradation from MMPs but also inhibited the apoptosis of activated HSCs [94]. Fowell et al. demonstrated that siRNA targeting TIMP-1 reduced HSC proliferation [89]. Using a TIMP-1-shRNA, Zhu et al. found that the shRNA-treated group had the lowest TIMP-1 expression and less collagen and fibrotic area [90]. Antifibrotic effects were also demonstrated in activated HSCs and CCl4-induced and bile duct ligation fibrotic rats by using a TIMP-1 siRNA carried by a recombinant adeno-associated virus [91, 92]. Furthermore, combining siRNAs targeting TIMP-1 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) exhibited a superior efficacy in hepatic precancerous fibrotic rats [93]. TIMP-2 is another member of the TIMP family that is upregulated during liver fibrosis [95]. Hu and colleagues used a modified synthetic siRNA targeting TIMP-2 to inhibit TIMP-2 expression in CCl4-induced rats. Moreover, the siRNA increased the expression of MMP-13, which further promoted the degradation of ECM and enhanced the hepatocyte regeneration [96].

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) constitute a complicated signaling pathway involved in various cell function regulation processes. Once phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate (PIP2) is converted to phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) through PI3K catalyzation, it will further activate phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) and the serine-threonine kinase Akt, which play critical roles in cell proliferation, survival, and glucose metabolism [97]. The PI3K signaling pathway is triggered by the activation and stimulation of HSCs and growth factors. Studies have shown that activation of the PI3K pathway facilitates the proliferation, migration, and type I collagen expression of HSCs. Significantly, liver fibrosis progression is related to the PI3K/Akt pathway with multiple regulation aspects [98, 99]. The depletion of thymosin β4 (Tβ4) remarkably facilitates the proliferation and migration of LX-2 cells and has been reported to be associated with the activation of LX-2 cells via activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Chen et al. transfected LX-2 cells with Tβ4 siRNA and observed upregulated proliferation and migration of the cells [99]. Another mechanism for regulating PI3K/Akt signaling is through siRNA targeting embryonic liver fordin (ELF) and glucose glycolysisrelated proteins, which are overexpressed in activated HSCs and serve as indicators of liver fibrosis. Wang et al. used ELF siRNA to reduce ELF expression and further silence PI3K/Akt signaling, TGF-β/SMAD signaling and downregulated glucose glycolysis-related proteins in activated HSCs [100].

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with pathological angiogenesis, and the proliferation of chronic liver fibrosis has already been reported in previous studies. Placental growth factor (PlGF), a member of the VEGF family, was reported to play an important role in liver fibrosis and angiogenesis progression. PlGF was found to be highly expressed in activated HSCs, which contributed to liver cirrhosis. Tu et al. used PlGF siRNA to reduce PlGF overexpression on HSCs, and the silencing effect of siRNA not only alleviated inflammation and fibrosis but also inhibited the activation and proliferation of HSCs via activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. Additionally, PlGF siRNA was involved in the downregulation of hepatic microvessel formation density and angiogenic factors, which were induced by hypoxia-dependent factor-1a (HIF-1a), VEGF and VEGF receptor-1[101]. Growth factor receptor-bound 2 (GRB2) regulates HSC proliferation and differentiation. The activation of GRB2 was mediated via high mobility group protein box1 (HMGB1), which was released from hepatocytes and increased in concentration during liver fibrosis. To reduce the overexpression of GRB2 that stimulates the cell proliferation and HMGB1 through the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway in HSCs, Zhong et al. used GRB2 siRNA to ablate the proliferation of HSCs induced by HMGB1 and upregulation of α-SMA and collagen. The result further demonstrated that the relationship among HMGB1, GRB2, and PI3K/Akt phosphorylation could be an effective target for treating liver fibrosis [102]. These results also show that the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway plays a critical role in liver fibrogenesis, and siRNA targeting the PI3K/Akt pathway could be a novel therapeutic approach for chronic liver disease.

Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase O (PTPRO) is another molecule that is involved in physiological and pathological processes in liver fibrosis. Sun et al. revealed that synthetic shRNA targeting PTPRO could offset the proliferation of HSCs induced by PDGF-BB and downregulate PI3K/Akt, ERK, and other pathways. These results indicated that PTPRO is implicated in liver fibrogenesis and provided a novel approach for the treatment of liver fibrosis [103]. Many studies have provided evidence that miRNAs are involved in the induction or inhibition of fibrogenesis. It has been found that unusual expression of miR-200s is associated with hepatic fibrosis. Cai et al. found that miR-200b increased cell growth and migration of HSCs and enhanced the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and the expression of MMP-2. miR-200b is therefore a potential marker for liver fibrosis progression and HSC activation [104]. Moreover, specific inhibitors of miR-200b could be possibly used to reverse liver fibrosis.

Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)

The NF-κB signaling pathway is involved in multiple biological functions, such as the immune system, inflammation, cell apoptosis, embryonic development, pathogenesis, and oncogenesis. NF-κB signaling is regulated by binding to the IκB family of proteins, inhibitor κB (IκB) proteins and the IκB kinase complex [105, 106]. Previous studies have indicated that the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) activates the NF-κB pathway by interacting with the ligands which enhances receptor expression [107]. It has been reported that RAGE is significantly increased in activated HSCs [108]. Zhi et al. investigated the mechanism and silencing effect of RAGE-specific siRNA on liver fibrosis in a rat model. The results showed that RAGE-specific siRNA attenuates the progression of liver fibrogenesis and reduces the expression of multiple inflammatory activities via NF-κB signaling pathway regulation. Moreover, the expression levels of α-SMA and type I collagen were also decreased after silencing RAGE [109]. NLRC5 has been found to play an essential role in the negative regulation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in liver fibrosis progression. Li et al. investigated the mechanism of NLRC5 in hepatic fibrogenesis and the reversal process by transfecting HSCs with PEGFP-C2-NLRC5 or NLRC5-siRNA, respectively. The results showed that NLRC5 was overexpressed during liver fibrosis and increased the expression of α-SMA and Col1α in HSCs. However, as NLRC5 was downregulated or knocked down by NLRC5-siRNA, the fibrotic response was reduced via inhibition of TGF-β1/SMAD-induced proliferation. HSC apoptosis was increased, and the activation of NF-κB signaling pathways was facilitated [66, 110]. Qian et al. reported that the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) pathway regulates the activation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‑induced HSCs. FGFR1-targeted siRNA decreased the activation of the LPS ‑ induced NF‑ κB signaling pathway, inflammation, fibrosis, and proliferation in activated HSCs [111].

miRNAs

In addition to siRNA-based treatments, miRNAs can be another type of therapeutics for the treatment of liver fibrosis[112]. miRNAs are endogenous small non-coding RNAs that regulate RNA expression post-transcriptionally. miRNA genes are transcribed into primary miRNAs by RNA polymerase II and then cleaved by RNase type-III endonucleases to form double-stranded miRNAs [113]. Finally, the double-stranded miRNAs are separated, and one of the strands is incorporated into the RISC complex, triggering specific degradation of target mRNA [113, 114].

It has been demonstrated that some miRNAs correlate with various liver diseases, including liver fibrosis [112]. For example, a 144-participants enrolled clinical trial () is designed to study the 800 circulating miRNAs in patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis. miRNAs play different roles during the progression of liver fibrosis (Table 2) [115, 116]. The relationship between miRNAs and HSCs during liver fibrogenesis was recently reviewed [117]. miRNAs can be either upregulated or downregulated during liver fibrogenesis. Upregulated miRNAs can be reversed by miRNA sponges, anti-miRNA oligonucleotides, and miRNA masking. For example, antagomirs are a class of chemically modified oligonucleotides that specifically and efficiently block the functions of upregulated miRNA [118, 119]. Antagomirs are, therefore, used to treat diseases caused by upregulated miRNAs. For example, Miravirsen (SPC3649) is a locked nucleic acid-DNA mixmer that effectively inhibits the function of miR-122 in a Phase IIa study () for HCV infection [120, 121]. Downregulated miRNAs can be restored by miRNA mimics or plasmid expressing the miRNAs.[22]

Table 2.

miRNA for the treatment of liver fibrosis

miRNA Expression level Target pathway/protein Animal model Refere nce
miR-542–3p up-regulation BMP-7 CCl4/mice 115
miRNA-199, 200 families up-regulation TGF-β/SMAD CCl4/mice 116
miRNA-21 up-regulation SMAD-7, Spry1 human fibrotic liver, bile duct ligation, AngII/mice 122,123

miR-129–5p down-regulation type I collagen human fibrotic liver 125
miRNA-454 down-regulation Wnt10a CCl4/rat 126,127
miR-378a-3p, miR378b,miR-378d down-regulation Hh sigal pathway/Gli3 CCl4/mice 129
miR-122 down-regulation type I collagen/P4HA1 CCl4/mice 132,133

Numerous miRNAs have been found to be upregulated during liver fibrogenesis. For example, miR-542–3p was found to control the activation of HSCs and to be upregulated in CCl4-induced mice. It promotes liver fibrosis by downregulating BMP-7 expression [115]. The overexpression of miR-199 and miR-200 families was also found to be positively correlated with the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway during liver fibrogenesis in both a fibrotic mouse model and human clinical samples [116]. miR-21 is an important gene implicated in the development of liver fibrosis, with a 24-fold induction in activated HSCs via the SMAD-7 signaling pathway [122, 123]. miR-125b is another upregulated miRNA that promotes the activation of HSCs through the RhoA signaling pathway, and the inhibition of miR-125b attenuated liver fibrosis in vivo [124].

In contrast to these upregulated miRNAs in liver fibrosis, some miRNAs, which inhibit fibrogenesis, were found to be downregulated [125, 126]. Chen et al. reported that miR-129–5p, which binds to the 3’-UTR of the COL1A1 mRNA, is decreased in osteopontin-induced fibrotic liver tissues. Transfection of miR-129–5p mimic reduced the expression of type I collagen in activated HSCs [125]. miR-454 is another miRNA found to be downregulated in the TGF-β1-stimulated mouse liver [127]. Transfection with the miRNA-454 mimic significantly inhibited the activation and proliferation of TGF-β1-treated HSC-T6 cells, reduced the expression of type I collagen and α-SMA, and further inhibited cirrhosis progression in vivo [126].

The hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway was reported to be involved in the progression of liver fibrosis by promoting the activation and proliferation of HSCs [128]. When the liver is injured, the Hh ligands Sonic Hh, Indian Hh and Desert Hh are secreted from hepatocytes and initiate the proliferation of HSCs[129]. HSCs further produce Hh ligands and activate the Hh signaling pathway via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms [130]. The Hh ligand/receptor axis releases Smoothened (Smo), which translocates the Glioblastoma (Gli) family into the nucleus to function as transcriptional activators. The activated Hh signaling pathway activates HSCs from quiescent to activated status and promotes the progression of liver fibrosis [129]. Several miRNAs have been discovered to be correlated with the Hh signaling pathway [112]. Among them, miR-378a-3p, along with its family members (miR-378b, miR-378d), was found to be significantly downregulated in activated HSCs and CCl4-treated fibrotic mouse liver [129]. Hyun et al. reported that miR-378a-3p suppressed the activation of HSCs via suppressing Gli3 expression. Meanwhile, the expression of miR-378a-3p is inhibited by Smo through the p65 subunit of the NF-κB signaling pathway [129]. Delivery of the miR-378a-3p mimic by nanoparticles reduced the expression of Gli3 and liver fibrosis in CCl4-treated mice [129]. In another study, miR-125b from chorionic plate-derived mesenchymal stem cells (CP-MSCs) was reported to suppress the activation of the Hh signaling pathway and subsequently attenuate liver fibrosis [124, 131]. miR-122 was found to be highly expressed in HSCs, but its expression is downregulated during liver fibrogenesis [132, 133]. Zeng et al. intravenously injected lentivirus expressing miR-122 and inhibited liver fibrogenesis in a CCl4-induced mouse model [132]. In another approach, miR-122 modified adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSC-122) were developed to reverse liver fibrosis in vivo by mediating the miR-122 communication through exosomes between AMSCs and HSCs [134].

As mentioned in a previous review [121], the methods to restore miRNA expression in targeted cells or tissues are more difficult than to block miRNA expression because designed miRNA mimics should be double-stranded and not extensively modified to maintain their ability to incorporate into the RISC complex. Similarly to siRNAs, the key challenges for miRNAs-based therapeutics is to overcome serum degradation and achieve targeted delivery [135]. A variety of viral and non-viral delivery systems have been developed for miRNA mimics [121, 135]. Up to now, there are still no microRNA-based therapeutics enrolled in clinical trials for liver fibrosis.

In addition to therapeutic applications, abnormal expression of miRNAs can be used as biomarkers for liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [136]. Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis were found at high risk in patients who have chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or C (CHC) [137, 138]. In an early 250 patients enrolled study, serum miR-122 were determined at a lower level in patients with hepatic decompensation compared to compensated liver disease group, indicating that the serum miR-122 can be a novel biomarker to predict survival in patients with liver cirrhosis [139]. In another study of 280 patients with different stage liver fibrosis, the expression of 13 fibrosis-related miRNAs were analyzed using RT-qPCR, and the expression of hepatic miR-122 was reduced in both CHB and CHC patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis than mild/moderate [140]. In patients with CHB, the serum miR-122 was reduced in advanced fibrosis stage, but no difference was found in CHC patients. In addition, serum miR-122 in CHB patients is 28-fold higher compared to CHC patients [140]. Nakamura and colleagues found a similar result about the serum miR-122 in CHB and CHC patients and demonstrated that the level of serum miR-122 in HBV-infected patients was higher than patients without liver disease [141]. Other miRNAs including miR-34a, miR-181, miR-214, miR-571 and miR-652 were also reported as potential biomarkers for liver fibrosis [117, 142144].

Conclusion

siRNA- and miRNA-based therapeutics are now being translated from bench to bedside, and one siRNA was recently approved by the FDA. The major challenge for nucleic acid-based therapeutics including siRNA, shRNA and miRNA is the specific delivery to target cells or tissues. Numerous viral and non-viral delivery systems have been developed for nucleic acid-based therapeutics in vitro and in vivo for different diseases including liver fibrosis.

Liver fibrogenesis is highly correlated with the activation of HSCs, which is regulated by numerous profibrotic cytokines. Using RNAi to downregulate these cytokines in activated HSCs is a promising strategy to reverse liver fibrosis. Meanwhile, expressions of certain miRNAs correlate with the development of liver fibrosis. Regulation of fibrogenesis-related miRNA is, therefore, another promising strategy to reverse liver fibrosis. This review focuses on the current siRNA- and miRNA-based liver fibrosis treatment strategies by targeting activated HSCs in the liver. There is an anti-fibrotic siRNA in clinical trial, but miRNAs are still in preclinical stages. With the approval of the first-ever siRNA drug and gene therapy by the FDA, nucleic acid-based therapeutics have gained a lot of commercial interest, which will definitely facilitate the development of siRNA- and miRNA-based anti-fibrotic therapies.

Aknowlegement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (2R01AA021510). Declaration of Conflict of Interest: All authors have read the journal’s policy on disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Dr. Kun Cheng has a US patent (15/288,837) for the peptide-431. All authors have read the journal’s authorship agreement and that the manuscript has been reviewed by and approved by all named authors.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Reference

  • 1.Friedman SL, Liver fibrosis -- from bench to bedside. J Hepatol, 2003. 38 Suppl 1: p. S38–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee YA, Wallace MC, and Friedman SL, Pathobiology of liver fibrosis: a translational success story. Gut, 2015. 64(5): p. 830–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scaglione S, et al. , The Epidemiology of Cirrhosis in the United States: A Population-based Study. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2015. 49(8): p. 690–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sun M and Kisseleva T, Reversibility of liver fibrosis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2015. 39 Suppl 1: p. S60–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tacke F, Cenicriviroc for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2018. 27(3): p. 301–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sanyal A, et al. , Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), a PEGylated fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet, 2019. 392(10165): p. 2705–2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tully DC, et al. , Discovery of Tropifexor (LJN452), a Highly Potent Non-bile Acid FXR Agonist for the Treatment of Cholestatic Liver Diseases and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). J Med Chem, 2017. 60(24): p. 9960–9973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Geerts A, History, heterogeneity, developmental biology, and functions of quiescent hepatic stellate cells. Semin Liver Dis, 2001. 21(3): p. 311–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marra F and Pinzani M, Role of hepatic stellate cells in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension. Nefrologia, 2002. 22 Suppl 5: p. 34–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Higashi T, Friedman SL, and Hoshida Y, Hepatic stellate cells as key target in liver fibrosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2017. 121: p. 27–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu H, et al. , Silencing of alpha-complex protein-2 reverses alcohol- and cytokine-induced fibrogenesis in hepatic stellate cells. Liver Res, 2017. 1(1): p. 70–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Issa R, et al. , Apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells: involvement in resolution of biliary fibrosis and regulation by soluble growth factors. Gut, 2001. 48(4): p. 548–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saile B, et al. , Transforming growth factor beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibit both apoptosis and proliferation of activated rat hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology, 1999. 30(1): p. 196–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng K and Mahato RI, Gene modulation for treating liver fibrosis. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst, 2007. 24(2): p. 93–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Raghow R, The role of extracellular matrix in postinflammatory wound healing and fibrosis. FASEB J, 1994. 8(11): p. 823–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Senoo H, et al. , Molecular mechanisms in the reversible regulation of morphology, proliferation and collagen metabolism in hepatic stellate cells by the three-dimensional structure of the extracellular matrix. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1998. 13 Suppl: p. S19–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Omar R, et al. , Hepatic Stellate Cells in Liver Fibrosis and siRNA-Based Therapy. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol, 2016. 172: p. 1–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhao Z, et al. , Development of a peptide-modified siRNA nanocomplex for hepatic stellate cells. Nanomedicine, 2018. 14(1): p. 51–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shukla RS, Qin B, and Cheng K, Peptides used in the delivery of small noncoding RNA. Mol Pharm, 2014. 11(10): p. 3395–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aagaard L and Rossi JJ, RNAi therapeutics: principles, prospects and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2007. 59(2–3): p. 75–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao Z, et al. , Development of a Biocompatible Copolymer Nanocomplex to Deliver VEGF siRNA for Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Theranostics, 2019. 9(15): p. 4508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cheng K and Mahato RI, Biological and therapeutic applications of small RNAs. Pharm Res, 2011. 28(12): p. 2961–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kulkarni JA, Cullis PR, and van der Meel R, Lipid Nanoparticles Enabling Gene Therapies: From Concepts to Clinical Utility. Nucleic Acid Ther, 2018. 28(3): p. 146–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stoff JA, Selected Office Based Anticancer Treatment Strategies. J Oncol, 2019. 2019: p. 7462513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wittrup A and Lieberman J, Knocking down disease: a progress report on siRNA therapeutics. Nat Rev Genet, 2015. 16(9): p. 543–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen Z, et al. , Targeted Drug Delivery to Hepatic Stellate Cells for the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen Z, et al. , Discovery of Peptide ligands for hepatic stellate cells using phage display. Mol Pharm, 2015. 12(6): p. 2180–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bhogal RK, et al. , Molecular aspects of regulation of collagen gene expression in fibrosis. J Clin Immunol, 2005. 25(6): p. 592–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tsukada S, et al. , SMAD and p38 MAPK signaling pathways independently regulate alpha1(I) collagen gene expression in unstimulated and transforming growth factor-beta-stimulated hepatic stellate cells. J Biol Chem, 2005. 280(11): p. 10055–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jimenez Calvente C, et al. , Specific hepatic delivery of procollagen alpha1(I) small interfering RNA in lipid-like nanoparticles resolves liver fibrosis. Hepatology, 2015. 62(4): p. 1285–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Toriyabe N, et al. , The Delivery of Small Interfering RNA to Hepatic Stellate Cells Using a Lipid Nanoparticle Composed of a Vitamin A-Scaffold Lipid-Like Material. J Pharm Sci, 2017. 106(8): p. 2046–2052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaps L, et al. , In Vivo Gene-Silencing in Fibrotic Liver by siRNA-Loaded Cationic Nanohydrogel Particles. Adv Healthc Mater, 2015. 4(18): p. 2809–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maiers JL, et al. , The unfolded protein response mediates fibrogenesis and collagen I secretion through regulating TANGO1 in mice. Hepatology, 2017. 65(3): p. 983–998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sato Y, et al. , Resolution of liver cirrhosis using vitamin A-coupled liposomes to deliver siRNA against a collagen-specific chaperone. Nat Biotechnol, 2008. 26(4): p. 431–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lindquist JN, Stefanovic B, and Brenner DA, Regulation of collagen alpha1(I) expression in hepatic stellate cells. J Gastroenterol, 2000. 35 Suppl 12: p. 80–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sato M, Suzuki S, and Senoo H, Hepatic stellate cells: unique characteristics in cell biology and phenotype. Cell Struct Funct, 2003. 28(2): p. 105–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shukla RS, et al. , PCBP2 siRNA reverses the alcohol-induced pro-fibrogenic effects in hepatic stellate cells. Pharm Res, 2011. 28(12): p. 3058–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jain A, et al. , Targeted Delivery of an siRNA-PNA Hybrid Nanocomplex Reverses Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Liver Fibrosis. Advanced Therapeutics, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nagata K, Expression and function of heat shock protein 47: a collagen-specific molecular chaperone in the endoplasmic reticulum. Matrix Biol, 1998. 16(7): p. 379–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu F, et al. , TGF-beta/SMAD Pathway and Its Regulation in Hepatic Fibrosis. J Histochem Cytochem, 2016. 64(3): p. 157–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang JH, et al. , Isorhamnetin attenuates liver fibrosis by inhibiting TGF-beta/Smad signaling and relieving oxidative stress. Eur J Pharmacol, 2016. 783: p. 92–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lang Q, et al. , The antifibrotic effects of TGF-beta1 siRNA on hepatic fibrosis in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011. 409(3): p. 448–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fabregat I, et al. , TGF-beta signalling and liver disease. FEBS J, 2016. 283(12): p. 2219–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.De Bleser PJ, et al. , Transforming growth factor-beta gene expression in normal and fibrotic rat liver. J Hepatol, 1997. 26(4): p. 886–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Meyer C, Meindl-Beinker NM, and Dooley S, TGF-beta signaling in alcohol induced hepatic injury. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed), 2010. 15: p. 740–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li L, et al. , Effect of RhoA on transforming growth factor beta1-induced rat hepatic stellate cell migration. Liver Int, 2012. 32(7): p. 1093–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fu MY, et al. , Transforming growth factorbeta1 reduces apoptosis via autophagy activation in hepatic stellate cells. Mol Med Rep, 2014. 10(3): p. 1282–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Verrecchia F, Chu ML, and Mauviel A, Identification of novel TGF-beta /Smad gene targets in dermal fibroblasts using a combined cDNA microarray/promoter transactivation approach. J Biol Chem, 2001. 276(20): p. 17058–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Walton KL, Johnson KE, and Harrison CA, Targeting TGF-beta Mediated SMAD Signaling for the Prevention of Fibrosis. Front Pharmacol, 2017. 8: p. 461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang S and Hirschberg R, BMP7 antagonizes TGF-beta -dependent fibrogenesis in mesangial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2003. 284(5): p. F1006–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Taipale J, et al. , Latent transforming growth factor-beta 1 and its binding protein are components of extracellular matrix microfibrils. J Histochem Cytochem, 1996. 44(8): p. 875–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wordinger RJ, Sharma T, and Clark AF, The role of TGF-beta2 and bone morphogenetic proteins in the trabecular meshwork and glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2014. 30(2–3): p. 154–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yamashita S, et al. , Activin A is a potent activator of renal interstitial fibroblasts. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004. 15(1): p. 91–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Deng L, et al. , CREB1 and Smad3 mediate TGFbeta3induced Smad7 expression in rat hepatic stellate cells. Mol Med Rep, 2017. 16(6): p. 8455–8462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cheng K, Yang N, and Mahato RI, TGF-beta1 gene silencing for treating liver fibrosis. Mol Pharm, 2009. 6(3): p. 772–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kim KH, et al. , The antifibrotic effect of TGF-beta1 siRNAs in murine model of liver cirrhosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2006. 343(4): p. 1072–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fu R, et al. , Targeting transforming growth factor betaRII expression inhibits the activation of hepatic stellate cells and reduces collagen synthesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 2011. 236(3): p. 291–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Herrera B, Addante A, and Sanchez A, BMP Signalling at the Crossroad of Liver Fibrosis and Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 2017. 19(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wozney JM, et al. , Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science, 1988. 242(4885): p. 1528–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sugimoto H, et al. , Activin-like kinase 3 is important for kidney regeneration and reversal of fibrosis. Nat Med, 2012. 18(3): p. 396–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kinoshita K, et al. , Adenovirus-mediated expression of BMP-7 suppresses the development of liver fibrosis in rats. Gut, 2007. 56(5): p. 706–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zeng XY, et al. , Suppression of hepatic stellate cell activation through downregulation of gremlin1 expression by the miR-23b/27b cluster. Oncotarget, 2016. 7(52): p. 86198–86210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li P, et al. , Targeting secreted cytokine BMP9 gates the attenuation of hepatic fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2018. 1864(3): p. 709–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fang L, et al. , TGF-beta1-elevated TRPM7 channel regulates collagen expression in hepatic stellate cells via TGF-beta1/Smad pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2014. 280(2): p. 335–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Li X, et al. , Role of histone deacetylases(HDACs) in progression and reversal of liver fibrosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2016. 306: p. 58–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Xu T, et al. , NLRC5 regulates TGF-beta1-induced proliferation and activation of hepatic stellate cells during hepatic fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2016. 70: p. 92–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shang H, Liu X, and Guo H, Knockdown of Fstl1 attenuates hepatic stellate cell activation through the TGFbeta1/Smad3 signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep, 2017. 16(5): p. 7119–7123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fan Z, et al. , MKL1 is an epigenetic modulator of TGF-beta induced fibrogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015. 1849(9): p. 1219–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lei XF, et al. , Hic-5 deficiency attenuates the activation of hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis through upregulation of Smad7 in mice. J Hepatol, 2016. 64(1): p. 110–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Breitkopf K, et al. , Expression patterns of PDGF-A, -B, -C and -D and the PDGF-receptors alpha and beta in activated rat hepatic stellate cells (HSC). Cytokine, 2005. 31(5): p. 349–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ying HZ, et al. , PDGF signaling pathway in hepatic fibrosis pathogenesis and therapeutics (Review). Mol Med Rep, 2017. 16(6): p. 7879–7889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Heldin CH, Lennartsson J, and Westermark B, Involvement of platelet-derived growth factor ligands and receptors in tumorigenesis. J Intern Med, 2018. 283(1): p. 16–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Heldin CH and Westermark B, Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol Rev, 1999. 79(4): p. 1283–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cao Y, Multifarious functions of PDGFs and PDGFRs in tumor growth and metastasis. Trends Mol Med, 2013. 19(8): p. 460–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Park HJ, et al. , Comparison of TGF-beta, PDGF, and CTGF in hepatic fibrosis models using DMN, CCl4, and TAA. Drug Chem Toxicol, 2016. 39(1): p. 111–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Matsumoto Y, et al. , MiR-29a Assists in Preventing the Activation of Human Stellate Cells and Promotes Recovery From Liver Fibrosis in Mice. Mol Ther, 2016. 24(10): p. 1848–1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Andrae J, Gallini R, and Betsholtz C, Role of platelet-derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Genes Dev, 2008. 22(10): p. 1276–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Borkham-Kamphorst E, et al. , PDGF-D signaling in portal myofibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells proves identical to PDGF-B via both PDGF receptor type alpha and beta. Cell Signal, 2015. 27(7): p. 1305–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang X, et al. , Targeting the PDGF-B/PDGFR-beta Interface with Destruxin A5 to Selectively Block PDGF-BB/PDGFR-betabeta Signaling and Attenuate Liver Fibrosis. EBioMedicine, 2016. 7: p. 146–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Majumder S, et al. , Study of the cellular mechanism of Sunitinib mediated inactivation of activated hepatic stellate cells and its implications in angiogenesis. Eur J Pharmacol, 2013. 705(1–3): p. 86–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Westra IM, et al. , Precision-cut liver slices as a model for the early onset of liver fibrosis to test antifibrotic drugs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2014. 274(2): p. 328–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ehnman M and Ostman A, Therapeutic targeting of platelet-derived growth factor receptors in solid tumors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2014. 23(2): p. 211–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kumar V, et al. , Co-delivery of small molecule hedgehog inhibitor and miRNA for treating liver fibrosis. Biomaterials, 2016. 76: p. 144–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen SW, et al. , RNA interference targeting the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta subunit ameliorates experimental hepatic fibrosis in rats. Liver Int, 2008. 28(10): p. 1446–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lim BJ, et al. , Selective deletion of hepatocyte platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and development of liver fibrosis in mice. Cell Commun Signal, 2018. 16(1): p. 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Roderfeld M, Matrix metalloproteinase functions in hepatic injury and fibrosis. Matrix Biol, 2018. 68–69: p. 452–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Campana L and Iredale JP, Regression of Liver Fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis, 2017. 37(1): p. 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Li Y, et al. , Inhibition of liver fibrosis using vitamin A-coupled liposomes to deliver matrix metalloproteinase-2 siRNA in vitro. Mol Med Rep, 2015. 12(3): p. 3453–3461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Fowell AJ, et al. , Silencing tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) with short interfering RNA reveals a role for TIMP-1 in hepatic stellate cell proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011. 407(2): p. 277–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhu Y, et al. , Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells expressing TIMP-1-shRNA improves hepatic fibrosis in CCl(4)-treated rats. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015. 8(8): p. 8912–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Cong M, et al. , Suppression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 by recombinant adenoassociated viruses carrying siRNAs in hepatic stellate cells. Int J Mol Med, 2009. 24(5): p. 685–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Cong M, et al. , Antifibrotic effects of a recombinant adeno-associated virus carrying small interfering RNA targeting TIMP-1 in rat liver fibrosis. Am J Pathol, 2013. 182(5): p. 1607–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhang Q, et al. , Influence of Expression Plasmid of Connective Tissue Growth Factor and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 shRNA on Hepatic Precancerous Fibrosis in Rats. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015. 16(16): p. 7205–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Murphy FR, et al. , Inhibition of apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 is mediated via effects on matrix metalloproteinase inhibition: implications for reversibility of liver fibrosis. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(13): p. 11069–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Arthur MJ, Mann DA, and Iredale JP, Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1998. 13(S1): p. S33–S38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hu YB, Li DG, and Lu HM, Modified synthetic siRNA targeting tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 inhibits hepatic fibrogenesis in rats. J Gene Med, 2007. 9(3): p. 217–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Paez J and Sellers WR, PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway. A critical mediator of oncogenic signaling. Cancer Treat Res, 2003. 115: p. 145–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Peng Y, et al. , Fluorofenidone attenuates hepatic fibrosis by suppressing the proliferation and activation of hepatic stellate cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2014. 306(3): p. G25–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Xiao Y, et al. , Depletion of thymosin beta4 promotes the proliferation, migration, and activation of human hepatic stellate cells. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2014. 34(2): p. 356–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tu W, Ye J, and Wang ZJ, Embryonic liver fordin is involved in glucose glycolysis of hepatic stellate cell by regulating PI3K/Akt signaling. World J Gastroenterol, 2016. 22(38): p. 8519–8527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Li X, et al. , Placental growth factor silencing ameliorates liver fibrosis and angiogenesis and inhibits activation of hepatic stellate cells in a murine model of chronic liver disease. J Cell Mol Med, 2017. 21(10): p. 2370–2385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ge S, et al. , Role of growth factor receptor-bound 2 in CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis. Biomed Pharmacother, 2017. 92: p. 942–951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhang X, et al. , PTPRO-associated hepatic stellate cell activation plays a critical role in liver fibrosis. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2015. 35(3): p. 885–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Xiao Y, et al. , Up-regulation of miR-200b in biliary atresia patients accelerates proliferation and migration of hepatic stallate cells by activating PI3K/Akt signaling. Cell Signal, 2014. 26(5): p. 925–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Gilmore TD, Introduction to NF-kappaB: players, pathways, perspectives. Oncogene, 2006. 25(51): p. 6680–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hayden MS and Ghosh S, Signaling to NF-kappaB. Genes Dev, 2004. 18(18): p. 2195–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mohamed AK, et al. , The role of oxidative stress and NF-kappaB activation in late diabetic complications. Biofactors, 1999. 10(2–3): p. 157–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lohwasser C, et al. , Role of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in hepatic fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol, 2009. 15(46): p. 5789–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cai XG, et al. , Anti-fibrotic effects of specific-siRNA targeting of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in a rat model of experimental hepatic fibrosis. Mol Med Rep, 2014. 10(1): p. 306–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Liu X, et al. , Role of NLRC5 in progression and reversal of hepatic fibrosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2016. 294: p. 43–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lou D, et al. , Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 antagonism attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of hepatic stellate cells via suppressing inflammation. Exp Ther Med, 2018. 16(4): p. 2909–2916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hyun J and Jung Y, MicroRNAs in liver fibrosis: Focusing on the interaction with hedgehog signaling. World J Gastroenterol, 2016. 22(29): p. 6652–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ha M and Kim VN, Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2014. 15(8): p. 509–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bartel DP, MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell, 2009. 136(2): p. 215–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ji F, et al. , MiR-542–3p controls hepatic stellate cell activation and fibrosis via targeting BMP-7. J Cell Biochem, 2019. 120(3): p. 4573–4581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Murakami Y, et al. , The progression of liver fibrosis is related with overexpression of the miR-199 and 200 families. PLoS One, 2011. 6(1): p. e16081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kitano M and Bloomston PM, Hepatic Stellate Cells and microRNAs in Pathogenesis of Liver Fibrosis. J Clin Med, 2016. 5(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Czech MP, MicroRNAs as therapeutic targets. N Engl J Med, 2006. 354(11): p. 1194–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Krutzfeldt J, et al. , Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature, 2005. 438(7068): p. 685–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Janssen HL, et al. , Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med, 2013. 368(18): p. 1685–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Thakral S and Ghoshal K, miR-122 is a unique molecule with great potential in diagnosis, prognosis of liver disease, and therapy both as miRNA mimic and antimir. Curr Gene Ther, 2015. 15(2): p. 142–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ning ZW, et al. , MicroRNA-21 Mediates Angiotensin II-Induced Liver Fibrosis by Activating NLRP3 Inflammasome/IL-1beta Axis via Targeting Smad7 and Spry1. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2017. 27(1): p. 1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Caviglia JM, et al. , MicroRNA-21 and Dicer are dispensable for hepatic stellate cell activation and the development of liver fibrosis. Hepatology, 2018. 67(6): p. 2414–2429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.You K, et al. , MicroRNA-125b Promotes Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Liver Fibrosis by Activating RhoA Signaling. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2018. 12: p. 57–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Chen Y, et al. , Osteopontin promotes collagen I synthesis in hepatic stellate cells by miRNA-129–5p inhibition. Exp Cell Res, 2018. 362(2): p. 343–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wang YZ, et al. , Repression of liver cirrhosis achieved by inhibitory effect of miR-454 on hepatic stellate cells activation and proliferation via Wnt10a. J Biochem, 2019. 165(4): p. 361–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhu D, et al. , Expression of microRNA-454 in TGF-beta1-stimulated hepatic stellate cells and in mouse livers infected with Schistosoma japonicum. Parasit Vectors, 2014. 7: p. 148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sicklick JK, et al. , Role for hedgehog signaling in hepatic stellate cell activation and viability. Lab Invest, 2005. 85(11): p. 1368–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Hyun J, et al. , MicroRNA-378 limits activation of hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis by suppressing Gli3 expression. Nat Commun, 2016. 7: p. 10993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Yang L, et al. , Sonic hedgehog is an autocrine viability factor for myofibroblastic hepatic stellate cells. J Hepatol, 2008. 48(1): p. 98–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Hyun J, et al. , MicroRNA125b-mediated Hedgehog signaling influences liver regeneration by chorionic plate-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep, 2015. 5: p. 14135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zeng C, et al. , Identification of a novel TGF-beta-miR-122-fibronectin 1/serum response factor signaling cascade and its implication in hepatic fibrogenesis. Oncotarget, 2015. 6(14): p. 12224–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Li J, et al. , miR-122 regulates collagen production via targeting hepatic stellate cells and suppressing P4HA1 expression. J Hepatol, 2013. 58(3): p. 522–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lou G, et al. , MiR-122 modification enhances the therapeutic efficacy of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells against liver fibrosis. J Cell Mol Med, 2017. 21(11): p. 2963–2973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Catela Ivkovic T, et al. , microRNAs as cancer therapeutics: A step closer to clinical application. Cancer Lett, 2017. 407: p. 113–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Hayes CN and Chayama K, MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci, 2016. 17(3): p. 280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Mokdad AA, et al. , Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. BMC Med, 2014. 12: p. 145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.de Martel C, et al. , World-wide relative contribution of hepatitis B and C viruses in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 2015. 62(4): p. 1190–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Waidmann O, et al. , Serum microRNA-122 predicts survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. PLoS One, 2012. 7(9): p. e45652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Appourchaux K, et al. , MicroRNA-based diagnostic tools for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 34935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Nakamura M, et al. , Serum microRNA-122 and Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein are useful tools for liquid biopsy of the patients with hepatitis B virus and advanced liver fibrosis. PLoS One, 2017. 12(5): p. e0177302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Roderburg C, et al. , Micro-RNA profiling in human serum reveals compartment-specific roles of miR-571 and miR-652 in liver cirrhosis. PLoS One, 2012. 7(3): p. e32999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Jansen C, et al. , The role of miRNA-34a as a prognostic biomarker for cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension receiving TIPS. PLoS One, 2014. 9(7): p. e103779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Li BB, et al. , Potentials of the elevated circulating miR-185 level as a biomarker for early diagnosis of HBV-related liver fibrosis. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 34157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES