Abstract
Melioidosis caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei has become an important clinical threat, especially in Northern Australia and Southeast Asia. However, the genome information on this pathogen is limited. B. pseudomallei isolates identified from bloodstream infections from inpatients were subjected to whole-genome sequencing by IonTorrent PGM and MinION Oxford Nanopore sequencing technologies. Highly accurate complete genomes of two strains, VB3253 and VB2514, were obtained by a hybrid genome assembly method using both short and long DNA reads. Both isolates carried blaPenI and carbapenemase-encoding blaOXA-57 genes, although the isolates were susceptible to imipenem by E-test method with MIC 1 μg/mL. Multiple IS family transposases specific for all non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNBs)—especially IS3 and IS5, which facilitate mobilization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase genes—were carried in these genomes. This further adds to the complexity of gene transmission. These IS families were identified only upon hybrid genome assembly and would otherwise be missed.
Keywords: blaOXA-57, blapenl, Burkholderia pseudomallei, imipenem, phylogeny, SNPs
Introduction
Burkholderia pseudomallei is an important clinical pathogen which causes melioidosis. The disease has a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from a mild subclinical infection to severe septicaemic shock. The commonly recognized risk factors for melioidosis include diabetes mellitus (type 2), male gender, occupational exposure to soil and water, and renal impairment, among others [1]. Confirmed cases of B. pseudomallei infection in patients require a minimum of 6 months of antibiotic treatment and life-long follow-up [1,2].
Northern Australia and north-eastern Thailand are the hotspots; Southeast Asia has high mortality and relapse. The known endemic areas in Southeast Asia include the Indian subcontinent, southern China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Cambodia and Taiwan, while the highest documented infection rate (20%) was observed in north-eastern Thailand [3]. Mortality rates for melioidosis range widely from 10% to 50% of infected individuals and with a recurrence of one in 16 patients [4].
The genome composition of B. pseudomallei is complex, with two different chromosomes of high GC content (about 68%), which makes it challenging to sequence this highly dynamic genome. It has about 2590 core genes in common with other those of other members of the Burkholderia genus [5,6]. Genome information on Indian B. pseudomallei strains is limited. The aim of the present study is to investigate the complete genome information of clinical B. pseudomallei isolates from hospitalized patients using hybrid assembly with IonTorrent and MinION sequencing platforms.
Methods
Strain isolation and characterization
Bacterial strains VB3253 and VB2514 were isolated from two patients diagnosed with septicaemic melioidosis. Blood samples were collected before the administration of antibiotics. As per institution protocol, blood samples for both cases were collected and sent to the microbiology laboratory in BacT/Alert bottles (Biomerieux, France). The bottles were loaded into the BacT/Alert modules. The blood culture VB3253 flagged positive in 1.05 days while VB2514 flagged positive in 2.28 days after loading. As per standard laboratory protocol, smears were made from the bottles which flagged positive. In both cases the smears showed Gram-negative bacilli. The blood culture broth was then subcultured onto sheep-blood agar and MacConkey agar. Appropriate biochemicals were also set up [7]. The plates showed growth of non-haemolytic grey colonies at 24 h on sheep blood agar, which turned hazy β-haemolytic by 48 h. On MacConkey agar fine pale colonies formed at 24 h, and the colonies turned pink (lactose fermenting) by 48 h. The colonies were oxidase-positive and showed a 4 + reaction on agglutination with B. pseudomallei-specific antiserum raised in rabbits [8]. The preliminary screening media and other biochemicals confirmed the organism to be B. pseudomallei. A fresh subculture of both strains was then used for the molecular work-up.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using commercially available E-tests (ceftazidime, imipenem and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, Biomerieux, France) and the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used for interpretation of the MIC values obtained [9].
Genome sequencing
Genome sequencing and assembly
B. pseudomallei genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in an IonTorrent™ Personal Genome Machine™ (PGM) (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 400-bp read chemistry as per manufacturer's instructions. De novo assembly was performed using raw reads with an Assembler SPAdes v.5.0.0.0 embedded in a Torrent Suite Server v.5.0.3.
Long-read sequencing was performed in a MinION Oxford nanopore sequencer as per manufacturer's instructions (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) with a 1D sequencing method in a FLO-MIN106 R9 flow cell. The Fast5 files were base-called with Albacore 2.0.1 (https://nanoporetech.com/about-us/news/new-basecaller-now-performs-raw-basecalling-improved-sequencing-accuracy). Canu 1.7 [10] was employed for error correction and genome assembly. Nanopolish 0.10.1 was used for polishing the contigs after de novo assembly (https://github.com/jts/nanopolish).
Hybrid assembly using IonTorrent and MinION reads
Hybrid assembly using both IonTorrent and MinION reads was performed to decrease the number of indels due to long-read sequencing. Unicycler (v0.4.6) was employed to overlay the accurate short-read sequences over the long reads to achieve complete genomes [11]. Contigs obtained were polished with multiple rounds of Pilon [12] to reduce the base-level errors.
Genome annotation and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis
Genomes were annotated using PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource (http://www.patricbrc.org) and NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/Pipeline.html). Sequence types were analysed using MLST 1.8 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk//services/MLST/).
Phylogenomic analysis
Complete genomes of global B. pseudomallei isolates were downloaded from the NCBI public database. B. pseudomallei genome contigs were mapped to the reference genome K96243 (Acc. No. BX571965-BX571966) using Snippy v4.3.5 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called using default parameters. The core-genome SNPs obtained were aligned for all isolates to infer a phylogeny.
The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the maximum-likelihood method using FastTree v2.1.10 [13]. FastTree was run using the generalized time-reversible (GTR) model of nucleotide evolution and incorporated the CAT approximation for identifying the evolutionary rate. Bootstrapping was performed by feeding 1000 resampled alignments generated in SEQBOOT v3.69 (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip/doc/seqboot.html) into FastTree using the -n option.
Results
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Both isolates were found to be susceptible to ceftazidime, imipenem and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole by MIC; VB3253: 1 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL and 0.125 μg/mL, and VB2514: 1 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL and 0.19 μg/mL, respectively.
Treatment and outcome
The patient infected with VB3253 was treated with meropenem intravenously (1 g over 3 h in 100 mL saline) for 4 weeks along with a trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole tablet (160:800 mg). The patient with VB2514 was treated with meropenem 2 g intravenously and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (160:800 mg) for 28 days. Both patients responded positively to the antibiotic administration and were discharged after recovery.
Genome length, CDS and ST types
The VB3253 and VB2514 genomes were obtained with 30x and 40x coverage, respectively. Each genome had two chromosomes. VB3253 had a genome size of 4 017 865 bp and 3 162 636 bp, while VB2514 had chromosomes of 3 987 244 bp and 3 116 035 bp. MLST 1.8 revealed the ST of two pathogens to be ST412 and ST734 for VB3253 and VB2514, respectively. Both the genomes VB3253 and VB2514 were submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers CP040531-CP040532 and CP040551-CP040552, respectively.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes
Both the isolates had blaOXA-57 and blaPenI β-lactamases with multiple IS family transposases (Fig. 1). Though the isolates belong to different sequence types, the genetic arrangements of the genomes remain almost same.
Fig. 1.
The β-lactamase genes blaOXA-57 (responsible for carbapenemase) and blaPenI (responsible for penicillin resistance) from VB2514 (A) and VB3253 (B), along with multiple family transposases.
Phylogenomic relationship between clinical strains and global isolates
Core-genome-based phylogenetic analysis of the clinical strains and the global isolates revealed similarity between Indian and Sri Lankan strains (Fig. 2). The next closely related strains were from Taiwan, Malaysia, Australia and the U.S. population.
Fig. 2.
Phylogenomic relationships among clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei strains based on core-genome-based single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) revealing the evolution of Indian strains in comparison to the global microbial population. The outer ring represents the country of isolation and the inner ring represents the sequence types. Indian strains VB3253 and VB2514 group with the Sri Lankan clade. Phylogeny was calculated using FastTree 2.1.10 with the maximum-likelihood method, and metadata were mapped using iTOL v4.
Discussion
Melioidosis has emerged as an important cause of mortality in the last 3 decades, especially in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia [14,15]. Timely diagnosis of melioidosis is critical to avoid fatalities. Identification based on clinical presentation is often challenging, and the disease is popularly known as the ‘great imitator’ [4,8]. Rapid molecular techniques are crucial for accurate and quick identification of Burkholderia spp [16]. Accordingly, isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing to understand their genetic background. Both the isolates from this study were carrying blaOXA-57 gene, class D β-lactamase. Interestingly, a study reported that >90% of blaOXA-57-carrying B. pseudomallei isolates were phenotypically susceptible to imipenem [17]. This is in line with the observation of this study, as the isolates were susceptible to imipenem with MIC <1 μg/mL. The isolates were also susceptible to ceftazidime (1 μg/mL) and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (0.125 μg/mL and 0.19 μg/mL for VB3253 and VB2514 isolates, respectively).
The B. pseudomallei genome is usually made up of two chromosomes of 4 Mb and 3.17 Mb. Of these, the larger one carries core genes and the smaller one carries accessory genes, including AMR genes [18]. Genomes of B. pseudomallei are known for their high rate of evolution and diverse clonality due to large gene acquisition rates [19,20]. Previous studies from India have reported the globally prevalent STs from Singapore (ST51), China (ST51, ST1099), Thailand (ST51, ST99, ST375, ST228, ST300), Malaysia (ST51, ST99), Burma (ST51), Bangladesh (ST56), Cambodia (ST56), Vietnam (ST56), Philippines (ST99) and Sri Lanka (ST1364), along with multiple novel sequence types [20].
Although multiple STs have previously been reported from India, as evident from the PubMLST database, this is the first report of both ST412 and ST734 from India. ST734 was known as an endemic clone in Australia, reported consistently between 1999 and 2018 from both human and environmental sources. ST412 had previously been reported only once in Thailand in 1966 from the environment (PubMLST). The ST734 and ST412 strains appeared to be tri-loci variants, with allele numbers gltB 2, 4, gmhD 3, 10, and lepA 2, 1, respectively.
The clonality comparison based on core-genome SNPs showed that Indian isolates were similar to Sri Lankan isolates. The near-neighbour clones were from Taiwan, Malaysia and Australia, including U.S. travel isolates. However, the sequence types varied between the clones, indicating rapid evolution and genome plasticity. Genomic information from this study concurs with that from a previous study which showed variation among B. pseudomallei isolates in both systemic and localized infections as a possible evolution over a short period of time [20]. Results from this study necessitate thorough surveillance to understand the rapidly evolving genetic characters of B. pseudomallei.
Conclusion
This study reveals the presence of blaOXA-57-carrying B. pseudomallei genomes. Their comparison with the global isolates reveals that the clones are similar to Sri Lankan clones. There is a threat of acquisition of AMR and other genes for fitness as well as spreading of the resistance gene to other NFGNBs due the high plasticity of the genome. Multiple IS family transposases specific for all NFGNBs, especially IS3 and IS5 (which facilitates mobilization of ESBL and carbapenemase genes) were carried in these genomes. This further adds to the complexity of gene transmission. These IS families were identified only upon hybrid genome assembly, and would otherwise have been missed. Findings from this study necessitate continuous monitoring to track AMR gene acquisition and spread among hospital-acquired infections.
Transparency declaration
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Cheng A.C., Currie B.J. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(2):383–416. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.383-416.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dance D. Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43(4):310–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Currie B.J., Dance D.A., Cheng A.C. The global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and melioidosis: an update. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102(Suppl. 1):S1–S4. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(08)70002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wiersinga W.J., Currie B.J., Peacock S.J. Melioidosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):1035–1044. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1204699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tumapa S., Holden M.T.G., Vesaratchavest M., Wuthiekanun V., Limmathurotsakul D., Chierakul W. Burkholderia pseudomallei genome plasticity associated with genomic island variation. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sim S.H., Yu Y., Lin C.H., Karuturi R.K., Wuthiekanun V., Tuanyok A. The core and accessory genomes of Burkholderia pseudomallei: implications for human melioidosis. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Abbott S.L., Cheung W.K.W., Janda J.M. The genus Aeromonas: biochemical characteristics, atypical reactions, and phenotypic identification schemes. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2348–2357. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2348-2357.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jesudason M.V., Balaji V., Sirisinha S., Sridharan G. Rapid identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei in blood culture supernatants by a coagglutination assay. Clin Microbiol Inf. 2005;11(11):930–933. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.CLSI . 29th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne, PA: 2019. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M100. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koren S., Walenz B.P., Berlin K., Miller J.R., Bergman N.H., Phillippy A.M. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wick R.R., Judd L.M., Gorrie C.L., Holt K.E. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walker B.J., Abeel T., Shea T., Priest M., Abouelliel A., Sakthikumar S. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Price M.N., Dehal P.S., Arkin A.P. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Limmathurotsakul D., Peacock S.J. Melioidosis: a clinical overview. Br Med Bull. 2011;99:125–139. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gopalakrishnan R., Sureshkumar D., Thirunarayan M.A., Ramasubramanian V. Melioidosis: an emerging infection in India. J Assoc Phys India. 2013;61:612–614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Naveen Kumar D.R., Veeraraghavan B. Accurate identification and epidemiological characterization of Burkholderia cepacia complex: an update. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12941-019-0306-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Panya M., Thirat S., Wanram S., Panomket P., Nilsakul J. Prevalence of blaPenA and blaOXA in Burkholderia pseudomallei Isolated from patients at Sappasitthiprasong Hospital and their susceptibility to ceftazidime and carbapenems. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99:12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Holden M.T., Titball R.W., Peacock S.J., Cerdeno-Tarraga A.M., Atkins T., Crossman L.C. Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14240–14245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403302101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Price E.P., Sarovich D.S., Mayo M., Tuanyok A., Drees K.P., Kaestli M. Within-host evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei over a twelve-year chronic carriage infection. mBio. 2013;4 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00388-13. pii: e00388-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Balaji V., Perumalla S., Perumal R., Inbanathan F.Y., Sekar S.K., Paul M.M. Multi locus sequence typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from India unveils molecular diversity and confers regional association in Southeast Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


