Abstract
Atherosclerosis is a chronic immunomodulated disease that affects multiple vascular beds and results in a significant worldwide disease burden. Conventional imaging modalities focus on the morphological features of atherosclerotic disease such as the degree of stenosis caused by a lesion. Modern CT, MR and positron emission tomography scanners have seen significant improvements in the rapidity of image acquisition and spatial resolution. This has increased the scope for the clinical application of these modalities. Multimodality imaging can improve cardiovascular risk prediction by informing on the constituency and metabolic processes within the vessel wall. Specific disease processes can be targeted using novel biological tracers and “smart” contrast agents. These approaches have the potential to inform clinicians of the metabolic state of atherosclerotic plaque. This review will provide an overview of current imaging techniques for the imaging of atherosclerosis and how various modalities can provide information that enhances the depiction of basic morphology.
Introduction
Atherosclerosis is a chronic immune-modulated pathological process affecting multiple vascular beds and leads to diseases that are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.1 Typically, atherosclerosis has slow progression and a long asymptomatic phase. In the later stages, atherosclerosis may manifest as either exertional symptoms due to luminal narrowing or sudden events related to plaque rupture. The latter may cause local occlusion, as occurs in myocardial infarction. Alternatively, sudden rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque may cause distal embolism. This is typically seen in ischaemic stroke distal to a proximal internal carotid artery plaque rupture.
Structural vascular imaging throughout the body has advanced rapidly. Certain morphological features of atherosclerotic plaques are associated with a higher risk of disease progression.2 Combining established imaging strategies with “smart” contrast agents and biological tracers allows us to obtain complementary assessments of biological activity within plaques. This carries the potential to improve our pathophysiological understanding, leading to better patient risk stratification and management.
This review will focus on the techniques available to image atherosclerotic disease. We will describe how certain modalities are well suited to image specific cardiovascular components. Finally, we will illustrate how studying biological activity within plaque advances our ability to detect disease, assess risk and guide patient management.
Biology of atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a multifocal immunoinflammatory condition of medium and large-sized arteries.3 Exposure to established risk factors, such as hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and smoking, creates a systemic environment that encourages endothelial dysfunction,4 oxidation of lipoproteins,5 production of free oxygen radicals6 and leukocyte migration.7 Accumulation of oxidized lipoproteins within the vessel wall forms fatty streaks. Macrophages migrate across the endothelium to phagocytose these lipid-rich proteins. The high intracellular cholesterol content of macrophages induces pathways of cell death. The resultant debris, along with necrotic endothelial and smooth muscle cells, forms the principal constituent of the lipid-rich core (Figure 1).8
Atherosclerotic plaques consist of necrotic debris contained by outward remodelling and a fibrous cap within the intimal surface. Vulnerable plaques are prone to rupture and have pathoanatomical features, such as large lipid-rich necrotic cores contained by a thin (<65 µm) macrophage-rich fibrous cap and microcalcification.9 In metabolically active plaques, macrophages accumulate in the fibrous cap and degrade the extracellular matrix that is produced by vascular smooth muscle cells.7 The necrotic core creates a microenvironment of hypoxia and stimulates angiogenesis.10
Calcium deposition in vessel wall inflammation occurs as a macrophage-mediated reparative response to oxidized lipid deposition and endothelial dysfunction. However, rather than being a passive by-product of degradation, the process of vascular calcification is active and controlled. Calcification in atherosclerosis primarily affects the intima. This is in contrast to medial calcification typically observed in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, which adopts a concentric transmural morphology.11 The initiation of vascular calcification occurs on a microscopic level (beyond the resolution of conventional imaging) and involves the deposition of calcium and phosphate-rich hydroxyapatite crystals.12 This early stage of “microcalcification” signifies intense biological activity and is associated with increased plaque vulnerability. In contrast, the larger established deposits of macroscopic calcification that ultimately develop are associated with plaque stability and a more quiescent phase of disease.
Vulnerable plaques have a thin fibrous cap that is devoid of vascular smooth muscle cells and exhibits intense macrophage recruitment.13 Rupture of the thin fibrous cap exposes the lipid-rich necrotic core to luminal flowing blood, initiating rapid and aggressive thrombosis that can cause vascular occlusion. However, plaque rupture is frequently silent and subclinical. Over time, vascular remodelling incorporates the exposed thrombus and the degree of stenosis may worsen.
Angiogenesis and collateralization can partially compensate for reduced blood flow caused by increasingly stenotic vessels. However, if arterial disruption is rapid, this compensatory angiogenesis has had insufficient time to occur, and the resultant ischaemia is more severe. Thus, vulnerable plaque rupture may cause sudden arterial occlusion, loss of tissue perfusion and catastrophic end-organ infarction. Prompt therapeutic reperfusion is required to minimize irreversible tissue loss in a highly time-dependent process.14
Anatomical imaging
Anatomical imaging is diverse and flexible. The chief objectives are to detect luminal narrowing and characterize atherosclerotic plaque. Imaging also allows a global assessment of atherosclerotic disease burden within the entire vascular territory. This information helps clinicians stratify the risk of future adverse events.
Catheter-based contrast angiography is the most frequently used method to image the coronary vessels. This is largely because of the high spatial and temporal resolution that can be obtained. Indeed, catheter angiography is also a platform for intervention. However, catheter angiography alone merely provides a “lumenogram” of the coronary circulation. Plaque characterization is possible but requires specialist equipment. Intravascular optical and ultrasound imaging allow the constituents of plaque morphology to be assessed in remarkable detail. These techniques are an excellent choice to image high-risk patients who may require simultaneous intervention.
There is a need to identify adverse plaque features using non-invasive imaging techniques. This is especially true in low- and medium-risk patient cohorts. Modern cardiovascular medicine has seen increased adoption of non-invasive imaging techniques. Angiography by CT or MRI is safe and offers a reliable alternative to catheter angiography. These imaging modalities can simultaneously image the vessel wall and any surrounding atherosclerosis. Similarly, ultrasound can determine blood flow across a lesion to quantify stenosis. Spectral analysis and specialized contrast agents can characterize plaque at the same time. Non-invasive imaging may also improve clinical decision making. It separates diagnosis from intervention, thus allowing rational decision making by a multidisciplinary team.
Here we discuss the imaging techniques available to visualize morphological features of atherosclerotic vessels. We touch briefly on how these techniques can help characterize plaque.
Intravascular imaging
Intravascular imaging techniques have the benefit of capturing images from close proximity to the plaque, thus offering extremely high-resolution images.
Optical coherence tomography
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides exceptionally detailed images of the fibrous cap using near infrared light delivered via a fibre optic wire (Figure 2C). The OCT catheter is positioned over a guidewire and a blood-free pool is created by injecting saline or contrast media. Using fast frequency domain analysis, OCT captures detailed images of the adjacent thin fibrous cap. The findings correlate well with histological features.15 High signals in the fibrous cap signify macrophage adherence and thrombus formation.16 These high resolution benefits need to be balanced against reduced tissue penetration which limits assessment of deeper plaque constituents. OCT is used clinically to detect vulnerable plaques and guide therapy in the coronary arteries.17,18 OCT is now being used for these purposes in carotid artery stenosis19 and peripheral vascular disease.20
Near infrared spectroscopy/intravascular ultrasound
Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is another catheter-based invasive technique. NIRS does not require a blood free field and uses wave scatter to produce a gradient map corresponding to the probability of adjacent lipid (Figure 2D). The resultant lipid-core burden index (LCBI) describes the ratio of high lipid content in adjacent structures against the total study area. Modern probes are combined with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to provide structural context to the morphological data.21
IVUS is a more established and, consequently, cost-effective technique than OCT and NIRS. It packages a high-frequency ultrasound probe in a catheter that can directly visualize adjacent atherosclerotic plaque from within the lumen (Figure 2D). High-resolution greyscale images show the structure of atherosclerotic plaque and the adjacent vessel wall. Features of plaque components can be identified by analyzing the backscatter and can reliably reveal the lipid-rich necrotic core, calcification and fibrofatty plaque.22,23 Despite reasonable tissue penetration, IVUS lacks the spatial resolution to measure the thickness of the fibrous cap. Like conventional ultrasound, mineralized calcium deposits cast acoustic shadows, thereby obscuring underlying tissue detail.
NIRS/IVUS is well established in detecting and treating coronary disease.15,24 Its use has been validated to perform a similar function in the carotid25 and lower limb26 arteries.
Non-invasive imaging
Ultrasound
In superficial vessels, such as the carotid and limb arteries, duplex ultrasound combines structural and functional data to quantify the degree of stenosis caused by atherosclerotic plaque. The ratio of peak systolic velocity proximal and distal to suspected lesions is used to estimate the degree of stenosis. Ultrasound can be used to measure the total plaque area27 and the greyscale pixel intensity of atherosclerotic plaque images have been shown to correspond with histological features.28 Ultrasound is non-invasive, radiation-free and portable. Hence, it is often used as the first-line imaging modality to quantify stenoses throughout the peripheral vascular tree.
The high resolution of ultrasound can differentiate components of the arterial wall in superficial vessels. Pathological proliferation of the intimal-medial layer is a sign of early subclinical plaque formation.29 Detecting this thickening using ultrasound can be used as a "window" to an individual’s global cardiovascular health. Indeed, increased IMT is associated with significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and death.30
Contrast agents containing a homogenous suspension of inert gas microbubbles (e.g. SF6) administered in the venous space can highlight specific features of arterial atherosclerotic plaque. In the carotid arteries, microbubbles identify neovascularization in culprit lesions with a sensitivity and specificity greater than 80%.31 In patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, contrast-enhanced ultrasound provides real-time characterization of luminal flow. Visualization of complications following endovascular repair, such as endoleaks, is feasible.19,32 The lack of ionizing radiation makes contrast-enhanced ultrasound an ideal modality for situations that require repetitive imaging.
Standardizing the ultrasound assessment of vascular beds reduce the risk of interobserver variability. Vessel assessment is not always possible if the view is obscured by densely calcifying atherosclerotic disease. Similarly, bone or gas overlying the target vessel prevents adequate visualization using ultrasound, limiting its use to easily arteries that are easily accessible.
Computed tomography
The use of CT angiography (CTA) is well established to assess the cardiovascular system. It is non-invasive and accessible. CTA has the added benefit of visualizing the entire vessel from its origin to target structure, even in tortuous vessels. Among its many applications, CTA has the spatial resolution to detect focal luminal stenoses and provide a global assessment of vascular disease. Owing to the short acquisition times of new generation CT scanners, it is now possible to image the coronary vessels in great detail. Indeed, CTA is highly accurate in determining coronary stenosis severity and has been incorporated within many clinical guidelines as the first-line imaging modality for individuals with suspected cardiac chest pain. CTA is used throughout the vascular tree. In the carotid arteries, CTA has a reported sensitivity approaching 100% and specificity of 63% (95% confidence interval 25–88%) to detect a stenosis greater than 70%.22,33,34
Beyond the assessment of luminal stenosis, CT can characterize plaque morphology. Several high-risk plaque features such as positive remodelling, spotty calcification, high-attenuation fibrous plaques and low-attenuation lipid-rich necrotic plaques can be identified.35–37 The napkin-ring sign on centreline reconstruction of the coronary vessels represents differentiation between the fibrous plaque and necrotic core.38 It is characterized by a crescentic high attenuation pattern surrounding a low-attenuation atheromatous lesion distinct from the vessel lumen—a morphological pattern that mirrors plaque histology.
CT is particularly well suited to visualize vessel calcification. However, beam hardening in relation to densely calcified plaque causes blooming that exaggerates plaque size and obscure the lumen—particularly in small calibre vessels with a high burden of calcification. In acute disease, CT is unable to differentiate soft-tissue components of a plaque. For instance, it is not possible to distinguish directly a stable fibroatheromatous lesion from acute plaque haemorrhage or thrombosis. Identification of the culprit plaque relies on a combination of radiological features along with the clinical presentation and pattern of end-organ damage.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Angiography using MRI is best suited to imaging large stable vessels such as the carotid arteries. Multicontrast MRI (T1 weighted, T2 weighted, proton density) offers excellent soft tissue characterization. This allows the constituents of atherosclerotic plaque to be investigated without the need for ionizing radiation. These properties make MRI useful in the longitudinal studies of chronic cardiovascular diseases. Administration of gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast media improves image acquisition times and provides further structural information outlining differences between the blood pool and vessel wall.39
Motion artefact near the heart makes imaging small vessels challenging. Advances in MRI have addressed this limitation. Accelerated image acquisition allows for a reduction of motion artefacts and noise.40 Bright-blood techniques use blood itself as an intrinsic contrast agent, thus reducing the requirement of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Now, a 1.5 T MRI machine can detect significant left main stem or three-vessel coronary disease in up to 94% of patients.41 Whilst image quality remains inferior to CT coronary angiogram, MRA can be useful in the assessment of coronary aneurysms and aberrant coronary ostia.42 Additionally T1 weighted imaging can be applied to the coronary arteries for the detection of intraluminal thrombus or intra plaque haemorrhage. MRI has the extra benefit of assessing cardiac dynamics along with myocardial perfusion and viability. Ongoing advances in cardiac MRI make it a promising imaging modality of the future.
In the carotid arteries, the superior soft tissue discrimination of MRI allows the measurement of the fibrous cap thickness and visualization of the necrotic core.43 The sensitivity to detect lipid-rich cores can be further improved using Gd-based contrast media.44 Following an acute event, such as a transient ischaemic attack from an internal carotid artery plaque rupture, T1 weighed MRI can detect intraplaque haemorrhage and thrombus. This correlates with the risk of future ischaemic events.45,46 Higher field strengths reduce background noise and artefact. Calcium typically appears hypodense, whereas fibrous tissue has a low signal intensity on T1 and high signal intensity on T2 weighted images.
“Smart” Contrast Agent MRI
Ultrasmall paramagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIOs) are 30 nm iron oxide nanoparticles stabilized with low-molecular-weight dextran. USPIOs accumulate in macrophages following phagocytosis and remain in the circulation for extended periods.47 Areas rich in USPIO-positive macrophages have a low-signal intensity on T2 and T2* weighted MRI.48 In the carotid arteries, USPIO accumulation within atherosclerotic lesions coincides with active plaque disease. These plaque exhibit intense macrophage infiltration.49 USPIO also accumulate with high affinity in areas of macrophage infiltration within abdominal aortic aneurysms (Figure 3C).50 Using smart MRI contrast agents to detect cellular activity within the vascular bed carries immense promise. These techniques may ultimately lead to the detection of active plaques at risk of imminent events and allow preventative therapy.
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
MR spectroscopy (MRS) combines the spatial imaging obtained from MRI with spectral analysis to detect the chemical composition and metabolic state of cardiovascular tissue. MRS is able to detect a range of atoms, including 1-Hydrogen (1H), 31-Phosphorus (31P), and 13-Carbon (13C).51In vivo carotid studies using MRS have successfully quantified cholesteryl esters within atherosclerotic plaque.46,52 Cholesteryl esters are the major class of lipids found in the lipid-rich necrotic core of vulnerable plaques. The chemical composition of structures is obtained using a chemical shift imaging sequence to acquire spectra over and around the atherosclerotic plaque. MRS amplitudes for specific metabolites, such as lipids, are then interpreted as a ratio to the amplitude of intrinsic water.53,54 The final analysis allows detection and quantification of the lipid content of atherosclerotic plaque.
Molecular imaging
Biologically active atherosclerotic lesions are inherently unstable and prone to rupture.55 Targeted biological tracers enable positron emission tomography (PET) and single proton emission computed tomography (SPECT) to detect increased activity of specific disease processes, such as increased glycolytic activity or microcalcification.
Biological radiotracer molecules typically consist of two components. One section has a ligand that targets sites of specific disease activity. The other component consists of a radioisotope. PET and SPECT scanners can detect the intensity and distribution of radiotracer activity following molecular engagement with target disease processes. PET has superior image definition and has gained popularity over SPECT.
Molecular imaging in cardiovascular medicine has made substantial advances recently with an ever-expanding array of biological tracers targeting different processes. Approaches to standardize quantification of radiotracer uptake has improved the reporting and reproducibility of results.56
Glucose and glycolysis
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a glucose analogue. It is the most commonly used biological tracer in clinical practice. 18F-FDG is taken up by metabolically active cells and its immediate metabolite is trapped within the cell following phosphorylation. This allows the quantification of cellular glycolytic activity. In vascular inflammation, uptake of 18F-FDG is pronounced in smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells and macrophages.57 Increased 18F-FDG uptake in carotid and coronary atherosclerosis correlates with unstable plaques and those that exhibit histological features of vulnerability,58,59 including increased CD68 macrophage density.60
Since 18F-FDG reflects glycolytic activity, uptake is non-specific. This limits interpretation of 18F-FDG PET in structures adjacent to those with a high physiological affinity to glucose, such as the myocardium. In order to visualize 18F-FDG PET uptake in the coronary arteries, it is necessary to suppress myocardial uptake using a low-carbohydrate, high-fat preparatory diet. However, these attempts at myocardial suppression are ineffective in around a quarter of patients, rendering assessment of coronary plaque activity very challenging.61
Macrophages and inflammation
Tracers that target macrophages directly, such as the somatostatin subtype 2 (SST2) receptor analogues, overcome the limitations caused by the poor specificity of 18F-FDG. Here, the combination of a somatostatin ligand with a DOTA- (1,4,7,10-Tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) or NOTA- (1,4,7-Tricarboxymethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane) based “cage” has resulted in the development of various tracers. The cage houses a positron-emitting isotope, such as Gallium-68 (68Ga) or Copper-64 (64Cu). PET studies reveal that these agents exhibit preferential vascular uptake in patients with established cardiovascular risk factors and adverse Framingham risk scores.62
Histological comparison of carotid plaque with high63 Ga-DOTA-TATE (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid]-D-Phe,1 Tyr3-octreotate) uptake reveals selective binding of the radiotracer to CD68-positive macrophage-rich lesions. In a pilot study,63Ga-DOTA-TATE correctly identified metabolically active coronary and carotid lesions with good reproducibility and higher sensitivity than 18F-FDG.64
Other tracers targeting macrophage activity include vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), 11C-choline and 18F-fluthymidine. Chief amongst these are translocator protein (TSPO) ligands (11C-PK11195), which are 18 kDa proteins expressed in the mitochondria of most cells. Activated macrophages exhibit marked upregulation of these translocator proteins. Preliminary studies suggest that 11C-PK11195 PET/CT correctly identifies suspected carotid lesions and has favourable tissue-to-background ratios compared to 18F-FDG.65
Activated inflammatory cells within atherosclerotic plaque exhibit CXCR-4 receptors. Novel PET radiotracers, such as63Ga-Pentaxifor, can be used to target these receptors.66 In the coronary arteries,63Ga-Pentaxifor is high in culprit vessels following acute myocardial infarction (median maximum standardized uptake value 1.96, interquartile range 1.55–2.31). These lesions also have high concentrations of CD68 +macrophages.67
Microcalcification
18F-Sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) binds to exposed hydroxyapatite crystals. Due to surface area effects, it preferentially binds to areas of developing microcalcification, which is beyond the resolution of CT.63,68 Because 18F-NaF is not taken up by myocardium, the background signal is low, which allows even relatively low signal to be visualized within the coronary vessels (Figure 2)—a significant advantage over 18F-FDG.
In vivo studies have demonstrated binding of 18F-NaF to areas of active calcification which are associated with plaque instability. Prospective studies have established high 18F-NaF uptake in culprit coronary69 and carotid plaques.69 In carotid plaque, the findings correlated strongly with histological features of high-risk plaques, including macrophage infiltration, necrosis and apoptosis. In culprit coronary vessels, high 18F-NaF uptake shows good agreement with high-risk features on intravascular ultrasound.69
The application of 18F-NaF PET/CT extends to vascular calcification in the wider arterial tree. In a prospective study of 72 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, there was marked uptake of 18F-NaF within the wall of aneurysms compared to non-aneurysmal sections and the aorta of healthy controls. High 18F-NaF uptake suggested weakening of the aortic wall and greater aneurysm expansion or rupture.70 These findings draw a link between metabolically active abdominal aortic aneurysms and morphological disease progression.
Hypoxia and angiogenesis
18F-Flumisonidazole (18F-MISO) is a biological tracer that concentrates in hypoxic viable cells due to an accumulation of its metabolites in an oxygen-deprived environment. Animal models show 18F-MISO correlates well with aortic atherosclerosis and areas of FDG uptake.71 Exploratory human studies suggest that 18F-MISO PET/CT corresponds to areas of vessel hypoxia, increased macrophage density and 18F-FDG uptake in symptomatic carotid artery disease.68,72
Angiogenic endothelial cells and hypoxic macrophages in atherosclerotic plaque express αvβ3 integrin cell surface glycoproteins. In animal models, αvβ3 targeted imaging with MRI sensitive paramagnetic particles identify areas of angiogenic proliferation.73 A novel PET tracer, 18F-Galacto-RGD, can also target αvβ3 integrin74 and in mice models of atherosclerosis, binds to sites of new atherosclerotic plaque. However, histological analysis in these mice models showed that uptake co-localized in macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaque, as opposed to angiogenesis specifically.75 Culprit carotid plaques demonstrate increased 18F-Galacto-RGD uptake on pre-operative PET/CT and post-operative autoradiography analysis. In a small sample of patients, 18F-Galacto-RGD binding showed a tendency to bind to plaque rich in macrophages and those with increased vasa vasorum density.76
Clinical translation
Anatomical imaging is part of routine clinical care. Advances in cardiovascular imaging now allow plaque characterization over and above the degree of vessel stenosis. Multimodality techniques enable in vivo detection of high-risk features and culprit plaques (Table 1). Biological PET tracers can detect and quantify specific disease processes before they manifest as structural changes or cause clinically significant events. Improved diagnosis, accurate risk prediction and targeted treatment remain a crucial objective in the management of atherosclerotic conditions.
Table 1.
High risk plaque feature | Optical imaging | Ultrasound scan | CT | MRI | PET |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vessel stenosis or occlusion | OCT | Duplex ultrasound scan | CT angiogram | MR angiogram | - |
Thin fibrous cap | OCT | - | - | - | - |
Large necrotic core | OCT, NIRS | IVUS, virtual histology | Centre-line arterial reconstruction | T1 weighted high intensity plaque imaging | - |
Angiogenesis and intraplaque haemorrhage | OCT | Duplex ultrasound scan, IVUS, contrast enhanced ultrasound | - | T1 weighted high intensity plaque imaging, αvβ3 targeted paramagnetic particles | 18F-MISO, 18F-Galacto-RGD |
Subclinical plaque rupture | OCT, NIRS | Duplex ultrasound scan, IVUS | - | T1 weighted high intensity plaque imaging | Novel fibrin and platelet targeted biotracers |
Glycolytic activity | - | - | - | - | 18F-FDG |
Macrophage infiltration | OCT | - | - | USPIO | 18F-DOTATATE, VCAM-1, 11C-Choline, 18F-Choline,11C-PK11195 |
Microcalcification | - | - | - | - | 18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) |
IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; NIRS, near infrared spectroscopy; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PET, positron emission tomography; USPIO, ultrasmall paramagnetic particles of iron oxide.
Coronary artery disease
The clinical presentation of occlusive coronary disease is variable. Contemporary imaging of the coronary vessels addresses two important objectives—the assessment of total plaque burden and the detection of end-organ ischaemia. Complementary imaging techniques can inform on the functional and metabolic state of atherosclerotic plaque. This adds a new perspective to plaque assessment beyond established imaging techniques.
The assessment of patients with stable chest pain highlights the evolving role of imaging to aid diagnosis. Traditionally, the risk of coronary artery disease was estimated using clinical risk prediction tools. If a clinical diagnosis was suspected, exercise testing and myocardial perfusion studies were recommended. NICE amended its guidelines in 2016 to reflect the benefits offered by CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and now recommends CTCA as the first-line investigation in patients with stable chest pain of suspected cardiac origin. The SCOT-HEART trial showed that, in patients with stable chest pain, CTCA reclassifies the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in up to a quarter of patients and improves the accuracy of diagnosing angina.77 Indeed, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of CTCA is 99% when using a cut-off of 50% stenosis.78 Hence, CTCA offers a reliable and low-risk approach to exclude significant coronary artery disease in low- and medium-risk groups.
Coronary stenosis alone does not predict the risk of future cardiovascular events. Instead, events appear most closely related to adverse plaque features and total burden: the more plaque you have, the more likely one will rupture and cause a myocardial ischaemia.79 The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a non-contrast CT technique that estimates overall calcification in vascular beds. The CAC score provides an improvement in predicting future cardiovascular events in patients at medium risk of ischaemic heart disease (Framingham risk score >10%).80 In particular, CAC scores capture patients at high risk, who would otherwise be incorrectly classified using traditional scoring methods.81
Multimodality imaging adds a further dimension to the assessment of patients with chest pain. For instance, in patients with acute coronary syndrome, the lipid core burden index on NIRS independently predicts future cardiovascular events (Hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence ratio 1.07–1.32, p = 0.001).82 In the heart, PET has traditionally remained a challenging area due to the non-specific uptake of 18F-FDG by the surrounding myocardium.69 However, uptake of 18F-NaF is more selective to regions of microcalcification. This makes it an ideal agent for studying the coronary arteries. In a study of 80 patients, 18F-NaF preferentially bound to IVUS-confirmed culprit coronary plaques.69 Similarly, a study of 119 participants showed that 18F-NaF PET/CT findings correlated with underlying angina (p = 0.023), prior cardiovascular events (p = 0.016) and Framingham risk scores (p = 0.011).83 The predictive power of 18F-NaF to identify culprit coronary plaques is the focus of an ongoing prospective multicentre trial in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease: the PRE18FFIR study (NCT02278211). Whether this can be enhanced by other novel radiotracers, such as 68Ga-DOTATATE,84 remains to be established.
Non-invasive multimodality imaging enables the detection of high risk features in vivo and promises improved risk prediction. Such high-risk groups could be targeted for more intensive prophylactic therapy, such as the emerging proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. However, the added value of such imaging will need to be established in prospective trials, such as the DIAMOND study (NCT02110303) where the benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with high coronary 18F-NaF PET uptake is being assessed.
Carotid artery disease
Extracranial carotid plaque rupture results in acute thrombus formation that may occlude the internal carotid artery or be the lead point for dissection. The thrombus may embolize to the brain or the eye causing permanent tissue loss. The goal in treating carotid artery disease is to prevent future thromboembolic events. Imaging the carotid arteries fulfils an important role in cerebrovascular risk prediction. The NASCET85 and ECST86 studies showed the benefit of endarterectomy in symptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis.87 Ultrasound is the mainstay of risk stratification of symptomatic carotid artery disease.88
We now know that early surgical intervention following an index carotid artery event is important to reduce recurrent embolic episodes from carotid artery lesions. Patients may have tandem disease. This group was excluded from the original NASCET trials. Hence, many guidelines do not advocate duplex ultrasound as the sole imaging arbiter prior to surgery. CT and MR angiography have the benefit of overcoming vessel tortuosity and visualizing the entire artery.89 However, nearly a third of recurrent disabling or fatal strokes occur in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis less than 50%.86 Ultrasound, CT and MR are limited to studying the morphological features of atherosclerotic plaque. They cannot reliably predict future cerebrovascular events in “low” risk groups with lesser degrees of stenosis.89
Additional imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and multiparametric or USPIO-enhanced MRI, can identify unstable and culprit atherosclerotic plaque. Moreover, PET imaging with 18F-FDG or 18F-NaF PET can detect the biological activity of culprit plaques, with 18F-NaF in particular binding to culprit carotid lesions characterized by a lipid-rich necrotic core (Figure 4).69 The combination of PET/MRI offers a substantial improvement with the potential to assess simultaneously for flow, thrombus, lipid core, plaque rupture and necrotic unstable plaque with microcalcification.
The treatment of asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease remains controversial.90 Similarly, there is no consensus on how to best treat symptomatic patients with internal carotid artery disease below the current threshold for intervention. Multimodal imaging has the potential to deliver this better risk prediction in a non-invasive and powerful manner. The SAFFIRE studies (NCT03215563 and NCT03215550) will assess the clinical significance of 18F-NaF PET/MRI in relation to plaque vulnerability, the requirement for surgery and clinical outcomes. This may lead to better risk stratification of patients with stroke permitting better selection for surgery: avoiding unnecessary carotid endarterectectomy whilst encouraging intervention in high-risk plaque below the current threshold for surgical intervention.
Aortopathy
The pathobiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms shares key features with atherosclerotic disease. Ultrasound scan remains the cornerstone of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and surveillance. However, current prediction models rely on a single morphological measurement of anteroposterior diameter to prognosticate the risk of aneurysm rupture. In males, this diameter is 55 mm91 although many advocate a lower threshold for females. Endovascular or open surgical repair is considered once aneurysms reach this threshold.92
Some aneurysms may rupture at sizes smaller than 55 mm whilst others reach large dimensions without causing any harm. Like carotid artery disease, multimodality imaging may provide better risk stratification than ultrasound scan-derived diameter alone.
MRI signal intensity can characterize thrombus organization with high accuracy. A high T1-signal is seen in disorganized thrombus that is typically unstable.93 A series of 35 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms found that individuals with high thrombus T1 signal intensity were likely to exhibit twice as fast aneurysm growth compared to those with organized thrombus.94 It is uncertain whether thrombus formation accelerates aneurysm growth. One possible explanation is that organized thrombus is the product of chronic stable aneurysm morphology, whereas a rapidly growing aneurysm has a large turnover of thrombus that is inherently unstable.
Smart contrast agents such as USPIO can further characterize biological activity within the aneurysm wall. High aortic mural USPIO uptake localizes to areas of macrophage infiltration and reflects vessel wall inflammation. An increased burden of USPIO uptake is observed in aneurysms with faster rates of expansion.48 In aneurysmal disease, 18F-NaF PET/CT detects aortic microcalcification. This is a common end point of multiple pathological processes ultimately leading to aortic degeneration. Increased 18F-NaF uptake is associated with faster aneurysm growth and an increased risk of rupture or requiring repair, independent of aneurysm diameter.70
Timely intervention is invaluable prior to the catastrophic consequences of aneurysm rupture. Conversely, better risk prediction may aid the decision of conservative aneurysm management in patients with major comorbidities. Much like carotid disease, multimodal imaging may provide useful insights into future risk and be a better guide for surgical intervention in patients with aneurysms above and below the current standard of care to consider intervention at a binary cut point of aneurysm diameter above 55 mm.
Peripheral vascular disease
Peripheral vascular disease is a heterogenous group of occlusive arterial conditions involving the lower limbs. Atherosclerosis primarily causes intimal calcification. In contrast, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease cause arterial stiffness by enhancing transmural calcification of the medial layer of the artery. Both processes are initiated by microcalcification.
Arterial duplex, MR and CT angiogram can visualize the lumen in large vessels but may either over estimate or underestimate the degree of stenosis in narrower arteries, such as below the knee. For instance, calcification in these small vessels causes a blooming artefact in CT Angiograms that obscures the view of the lumen. When calcification is not present, a contrast-enhanced residual lumen can be over estimated in CT with voxels that are too large. Hence, diagnostic angiography remains the gold-standard to visualize luminal narrowing in the lower limbs owing to its high spatial resolution. This approach, however, does not image the arterial wall or inform on the biological activity within it.
18F-Fluoride binds with good affinity to femoral plaque and is better at detecting inflammation compared to 18F-FDG.95 A study of 409 oncology patients undergoing 18F-NaF PET/CT were incidentally found to have significant femoral artery 18F-fluoride uptake. The degree of uptake correlated strongly with hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, smoking habit, diabetes mellitus and prior cardiovascular events.96 The clinical progression of this uptake in longitudinal studies remains to be validated.
Drug evaluation
Multimodal imaging can provide objective surrogate end points to confirm target engagement and treatment efficacy in relatively modest-sized populations.
One example is the study of statins in cardiovascular disease. The effect of statins on atherosclerotic burden has been extensively investigated using invasive97–99 and non-invasive100–102 imaging techniques. Intravascular imaging using OCT and IVUS was used to study the effects of statins on atheroma in trials such as ASTEROID,97 ESTABLISH99 and REVERSAL.103 Similarly, MRI has been used to quantify the reduction in the lipid content of necrotic core after treatment with rosuvastatin at 1 and 2 years of follow-up.100,101 The ATHEROMA trial used USPIO-enhanced MRI to show a reduction in carotid plaque inflammation within 3 months of starting atorvastatin.102
Imaging may be used to validate the effect of therapeutic interventions. The REMNANT trial studied the effect of thrombus aspiration from culprit plaques in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The investigators used IVUS to quantify the percentage increase in lumen volume following thrombus aspiration and showed that aggressive intervention was likely to result in successful stent deployment.104 Conversely, MRI and PET/CT have been used to determine a lack of clinical efficacy. The dal-PLAQUE study did not show a reduction in vessel wall inflammation using the CTEP inhibitor, dalcetrapib: an agent that is now known to be clinically ineffective.105
Conclusion
Detailed structural and functional assessment of the vascular tree is possible with conventional imaging modalities. However, the promise of identifying vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque leading to cardiovascular events remains elusive. Multimodality cardiovascular imaging provides the clinician with valuable information on the morphology and metabolic state of atherosclerotic diseases. Combining imaging modalities offers powerful tools to study specific disease processes in the context of diagnosis, risk prediction and targeted intervention.
A paradigm shift to move away from the assessment of stenosis severity alone is required. Detecting high-risk plaque features promises to reclassify low- and medium-risk individuals who are, in fact, at high risk of developing adverse cardiovascular events. Correctly identifying this group is the greatest unmet clinical need in contemporary cardiovascular imaging. Incorporating novel imaging techniques addresses the limitations of modern stenosis-driven approaches. Translating these wide range of imaging techniques into clinical practice is the next major advance in atherosclerotic plaque assessment. Ongoing research on the role of metabolic imaging promises to detect and prognosticate cardiovascular disease progression. These studies will better inform the translation of novel imaging modalities to mainstream clinical practice.
Contributor Information
Maaz BJ Syed, Email: maaz.syed@ed.ac.uk.
Alexander J Fletcher, Email: Alexander.fletcher@ed.ac.uk.
Rachael O Forsythe, Email: rachael.forsythe@ed.ac.uk.
Jakub Kaczynski, Email: jakub.kaczynski@ed.ac.uk.
David E Newby, Email: d.e.newby@ed.ac.uk.
Marc R Dweck, Email: mdweck@exseed.ed.ac.uk.
Edwin JR van Beek, Email: edwin-vanbeek@ed.ac.uk.
REFERENCES
- 1.Herrington W, Lacey B, Sherliker P, Armitage J, Lewington S. Epidemiology of atherosclerosis and the potential to reduce the global burden of atherothrombotic disease. Circ Res 2016; 118: 535–46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Puchner SB, Liu T, Mayrhofer T, Truong QA, Lee H, Fleg JL, et al. . High-Risk Plaque Detected on Coronary CT Angiography Predicts Acute Coronary Syndromes Independent of Significant Stenosis in Acute Chest Pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 684–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Teague HL, Ahlman MA, Alavi A, Wagner DD, Lichtman AH, Nahrendorf M, et al. . Unraveling vascular inflammation: from immunology to imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 1403–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004; 109(23_suppl_1): III-27–-20. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131515.03336.f8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pirillo A, Bonacina F, Norata GD, Catapano AL. The interplay of lipids, lipoproteins, and immunity in atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2018; 20: 12. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0715-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mullick AE, Soldau K, Kiosses WB, Bell TA, Tobias PS, Curtiss LK. Increased endothelial expression of Toll-like receptor 2 at sites of disturbed blood flow exacerbates early atherogenic events. J Exp Med 2008; 205: 373–83. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Newby AC. Metalloproteinase production from macrophages - a perfect storm leading to atherosclerotic plaque rupture and myocardial infarction. Exp Physiol 2016; 101: 1327–37. doi: 10.1113/EP085567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W, et al. . A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on vascular lesions of the Council on arteriosclerosis, American heart association. Circulation 1995; 92: 1355–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Virmani R, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A. Pathology of the Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma. J Intervent Cardiol 2003; 16: 267–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sluimer JC, Gasc J-M, van Wanroij JL, Kisters N, Groeneweg M, Sollewijn Gelpke MD, van WJL, Gelpke MDS, et al. . Hypoxia, hypoxia-inducible transcription factor, and macrophages in human atherosclerotic plaques are correlated with intraplaque angiogenesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1258–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fuery MA, Liang L, Kaplan FS, Mohler ER. Vascular ossification: pathology, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Bone 2018; 109: 28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hirsch D, Azoury R, Sarig S, Kruth HS. Colocalization of cholesterol and hydroxyapatite in human atherosclerotic lesions. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 52: 94–8. doi: 10.1007/BF00308315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Virmani R, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A. Pathology of the Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma:. A type of vulnerable plaque. J Interv Cardiol 2003; 16: 267–72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.8042.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. . Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. The Lancet 2014; 384: 1929–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jang I-K, Tearney GJ, MacNeill B, Takano M, Moselewski F, Iftima N, et al. . In vivo characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by use of optical coherence tomography. Circulation 2005; 111: 1551–5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000159354.43778.69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tearney GJ, Yabushita H, Houser SL, Aretz HT, Jang I-K, Schlendorf KH, et al. . Quantification of macrophage content in atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 2003; 107: 113–9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000044384.41037.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bouma BE, et al. Evaluation of intracoronary stenting by intravascular optical coherence tomography. Heart 2003; 89: 317–20. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.3.317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jang I-K, Bouma BE, Kang D-H, Park S-J, Park S-W, Seung K-B, et al. . Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 604–9. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01799-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dohad S, Zhu A, Krishnan S, Wang F, Wang S, Cox J, et al. . Optical coherence tomography guided carotid artery stent procedure: technique and potential applications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 91: 521–30. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schwindt AG, Bennett JG, Crowder WH, Dohad S, Janzer SF, George JC, et al. . Lower Extremity Revascularization Using Optical Coherence Tomography–Guided Directional Atherectomy: Final Results of the E V aluat I on of the Pantheri S Opt I cal C O herence Tomography Imagi N g Atherectomy System for Use in the Peripheral Vasculature (VISION) Study. J Endovasc Ther 2017; 24: 355–66. doi: 10.1177/1526602817701720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Waxman S, Dixon SR, L'Allier P, Moses JW, Petersen JL, Cutlip D, et al. . In vivo validation of a Catheter-Based near-infrared spectroscopy system for detection of lipid core coronary plaques. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2009; 2: 858–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Voros S, Rinehart S, Qian Z, Vazquez G, Anderson H, Murrieta L, et al. . Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency Backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the Atlanta (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 198–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Broersen A, de Graaf MA, Eggermont J, Wolterbeek R, Kitslaar PH, Dijkstra J, et al. . Enhanced characterization of calcified areas in intravascular ultrasound virtual histology images by quantification of the acoustic shadow: validation against computed tomography coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 32: 543–52. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0820-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brugaletta S, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW, de Boer S, Ligthart J, Gomez-Lara J, et al. . Nirs and IVUS for characterization of atherosclerosis in patients undergoing coronary angiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2011; 4: 647–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Štěchovský C, Hájek P, Horváth M, Špaček M, Veselka J. Near-Infrared spectroscopy combined with intravascular ultrasound in carotid arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 32: 181–8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0687-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yin D, Matsumura M, Rundback J, Yoho JA, Witzenbichler B, Stone GW, et al. . Comparison of plaque morphology between peripheral and coronary artery disease (from the clarity and ADAPT-DES IVUS substudies. Coron Artery Dis 2017; 28: 369–75. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ultrasound carotid plaque features. cardiovascular disease risk factors and events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis - ScienceDirect n.d. accessed July 10, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lal BK, Hobson RW, Pappas PJ, Kubicka R, Hameed M, Chakhtura EY, et al. . Pixel distribution analysis of B-mode ultrasound scan images predicts histologic features of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 1210–7. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.122888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aloke F V, Kolodgie Frank D, Renu V. Correlation between carotid Intimal/Medial thickness and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30: 177–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, Lonn E, Kendall CB, Mohler ER, et al. . Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of echocardiography carotid intima-media thickness Task force endorsed by the Society for vascular medicine. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2008; 21: 93–111. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang R, Abdelmoneim SS, Ball CA, Nhola LF, Farrell AM, Feinstein S, et al. . Detection of carotid atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization using contrast enhanced ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2016; 29: 491–502. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mirza TA, Karthikesalingam A, Jackson D, Walsh SR, Holt PJ, Hayes PD, et al. . Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of endoleak after EVAR: systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2010; 39: 418–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, Taylor LM, Lee RW, Cummings CA, et al. . Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17: 152–9. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(93)90019-I [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, Johnston SC, Dillon WP, Smith WS. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 2004; 63: 457–60. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000135154.53953.2C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Voros S, Merkely B, Hoffmann U. Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014; 11: 390–402. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Divakaran S, Cheezum MK, Hulten EA, Bittencourt MS, Silverman MG, Nasir K, et al. . Use of cardiac CT and calcium scoring for detecting coronary plaque: implications on prognosis and patient management. Br J Radiol 2015; 88: 20140594.. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M, Kondo T, Kawai H, Nagahara Y, et al. . Plaque Characterization by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and the Likelihood of Acute Coronary Events in Mid-Term Follow-Up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 337–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Maurovich-Horvat P, Hoffmann U, Vorpahl M, Nakano M, Virmani R, Alkadhi H. The Napkin-Ring sign: CT signature of high-risk coronary plaques? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 440–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fathi A, Weir-McCall JR, Struthers AD, Lipworth BJ, Houston G. Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis. Br J Radiol 2018; 20170717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Akçakaya M, Basha TA, Chan RH, Manning WJ, Nezafat R. Accelerated isotropic sub-millimeter whole-heart coronary MRI: compressed sensing versus parallel imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014; 71: 815–22. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, Flamm SD, Plein S, Nagel E, et al. . Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1863–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dweck MR, Williams MC, Moss AJ, Newby DE, Fayad ZA. Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 2201–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000; 102: 959–64. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.9.959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kerwin WS, Zhao X, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Maravilla KR, Underhill HR, et al. . Contrast-Enhanced MRI of carotid atherosclerosis: dependence on contrast agent. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009; 30: 35–40. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chu B, Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Yarnykh VL, O’Brien KD, et al. . Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke 2004; 35: 1079–84. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125856.25309.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Saam T, Hetterich H, Hoffmann V, Yuan C, Dichgans M, Poppert H, et al. . Meta-Analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1081–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kooi ME, Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KBJM, Kessels AGH, Kitslaar PJEHM, Borgers M, et al. . Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2003; 107: 2453–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000068315.98705.CC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Richards JMJ, Semple SI, MacGillivray TJ, Gray C, Langrish JP, Williams M, et al. . Abdominal aortic aneurysm growth predicted by uptake of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide. Circulation 2011; 4: 274–81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.959866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Trivedi RA, U-King-Im J-M, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Horsley J, Goddard MJ, et al. . In vivo detection of macrophages in human carotid atheroma: temporal dependence of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced MRI. Stroke 2004; 35: 1631–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McBride OMB, Berry C, Burns P, Chalmers RTA, Doyle B, Forsythe R, et al. . MRI using ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in patients under surveillance for abdominal aortic aneurysms to predict rupture or surgical repair: MRI for abdominal aortic aneurysms to predict rupture or surgery—the MA 3 RS study. Open Heart 2015; 2: e000190. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Neubauer S. Cardiac magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Curr Cardiol Rep 2003; 5: 75–82. doi: 10.1007/s11886-003-0041-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zajicek J, Pearlman JD, Merickel MB, Ayers CR, Brookeman JR, Brown MF. High-Resolution proton NMR spectra of human arterial plaque. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1987; 149: 437–42. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(87)90386-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xin L, Lanz B, Lei gxia, Gruetter R. Assessment of Metabolic Fluxes in the Mouse Brain in Vivo Using 11 H-[ 13 C] NMR Spectroscopy at 14.1 Tesla. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2015; 35: 759–65. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Deelchand DK, Moortele P-FVde, Adriany G, Iltis I, Andersen P, Strupp JP, et al. . In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at 9.4T: initial results. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 2010; 206: 74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res 2014; 114: 1852–66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gholami S, Salavati A, Houshmand S, Werner TJ, Alavi A. Assessment of atherosclerosis in large vessel walls: a comprehensive review of FDG-PET/CT image acquisition protocols and methods for uptake quantification. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2015; 22: 468–79. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0069-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Folco EJ, Sheikine Y, Rocha VZ, Christen T, Shvartz E, Sukhova GK, et al. . Hypoxia but not inflammation augments glucose uptake in human macrophages: implications for imaging atherosclerosis with 18Fluorine-Labeled 2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 603–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Menezes LJ, Kotze CW, Agu O, Richards T, Brookes J, Goh VJ, et al. . Investigating vulnerable atheroma using combined 18F-FDG PET/CT angiography of carotid plaque with immunohistochemical validation. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2011; 52: 1698–703. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wykrzykowska J, Lehman S, Williams G, Parker JA, Palmer MR, Varkey S, et al. . Imaging of inflamed and vulnerable plaque in coronary arteries with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suppression of myocardial uptake using a low-carbohydrate, high-fat preparation. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009; 50: 563–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Græbe M, Pedersen SF, Borgwardt L, Højgaard L, Sillesen H, Kjær A. Molecular pathology in vulnerable carotid plaques: correlation with [18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2009; 37: 714–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tarkin JM, Dweck MR, Evans NR, Takx RAP, Brown AJ, Tawakol A, et al. . Imaging atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2016; 118: 750–69. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Malmberg C, Ripa RS, Johnbeck CB, Knigge U, Langer SW, Mortensen J, et al. . 64Cu-DOTATATE for noninvasive assessment of atherosclerosis in large arteries and its correlation with risk factors: head-to-head comparison with 68Ga-DOTATOC in 60 patients. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2015; 56: 1895–900. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Dweck MR, Aikawa E, Newby DE, Tarkin JM, Rudd JHF, Narula J, et al. . Noninvasive molecular imaging of disease activity in atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2016; 119: 330–40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Evans NR, Chowdhury MM, Figg NL, Shah AV, et al. . Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 1774–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gaemperli O, Shalhoub J, Owen DRJ, Lamare F, Johansson S, Fouladi N, et al. . Imaging intraplaque inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis with 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1902–10. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Weiberg D, Thackeray JT, Daum G, Sohns JM, Kropf S, Wester H-J, et al. . Clinical Molecular Imaging of Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Expression in Atherosclerotic Plaque Using 88 Ga-Pentixafor PET: Correlation with Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Calcified Plaque Burden. J Nucl Med 2018; 59: 266–72. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.196485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Derlin T, Sedding DG, Dutzmann J, Haghikia A, König T, Napp LC, et al. . Imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in culprit and nonculprit coronary atherosclerotic plaque using motion-corrected [68Ga]pentixafor PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45: 1934–44. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4076-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Vesey AT, Jenkins WSA, Irkle A, Moss A, Sng G, Forsythe RO, et al. . 18F-Fluoride and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke: Case–Control study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10: e004976: e004976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Joshi NV, Vesey AT, Williams MC, Shah ASV, Calvert PA, Craighead FHM, et al. . 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial. The Lancet 2014; 383: 705–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61754-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Forsythe RO, Dweck MR, McBride OMB, Vesey AT, Semple SI, Shah ASV, et al. . 18F–Sodium fluoride uptake in abdominal aortic aneurysms: the SoFIA3 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71: 513–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mateo J, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Badimon JJ, Fayad ZA, Fuster V. Noninvasive Assessment of Hypoxia in Rabbit Advanced Atherosclerosis Using 18 F-fluoromisonidazole Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging. Circulation 2014; 7: 312–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Joshi FR, Manavaki R, Fryer TD, Buscombe JR, Smith R, Figg N, et al. . Imaging of hypoxia and inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis with 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation 2013; 128: A14673 [Google Scholar]
- 73.Winter PM, Morawski AM, Caruthers SD, Fuhrhop RW, Zhang H, Williams TA, et al. . Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis in Early-Stage Atherosclerosis With α v β 3 -Integrin–Targeted Nanoparticles. Circulation 2003; 108: 2270–4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093185.16083.95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Haubner R, Kuhnast B, Mang C, Weber WA, Kessler H, Wester H-J, et al. . [18 F]Galacto-RGD: Synthesis, Radiolabeling, Metabolic Stability, and Radiation Dose Estimates. Bioconjug Chem 2004; 15: 61–9. doi: 10.1021/bc034170n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Laitinen I, Saraste A, Weidl E, Poethko T, Weber AW, Nekolla SG, et al. . Evaluation of αVβ3 integrin-targeted positron emission tomography tracer 18F-Galacto-RGD for imaging of vascular inflammation in atherosclerotic MiceCLINICAL perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 331–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Beer AJ, Pelisek J, Heider P, Saraste A, Reeps C, Metz S, et al. . Pet/Ct imaging of integrin αvβ3 expression in human carotid atherosclerosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2014; 7: 178–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Investigators S-H CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label,parallel-group, multicentre trial. 2015;. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 78.Pugliese F, Mollet NRA, Runza G, van Mieghem C, Meijboom WB, Malagutti P, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 575–82. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0041-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Williams MC, Moss AJ, Dweck M, Adamson PD, Alam S, Hunter A, et al. . Coronary Artery Plaque Characteristics Associated With Adverse Outcomes in the SCOT-HEART Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73: 291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004; 291: 210–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.2.210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Polonsky TS, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. JAMA 2010; 303: 1610–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Schuurman A-S, Vroegindewey M, Kardys I, Oemrawsingh RM, Cheng JM, de Boer S, et al. . Near-Infrared spectroscopy-derived lipid core burden index predicts adverse cardiovascular outcome in patients with coronary artery disease during long-term follow-up. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 295–302. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dweck MR, Chow MWL, Joshi NV, Williams MC, Jones C, Fletcher AM, et al. . Coronary arterial 18F-Sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1539–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dalm VASH, van Hagen PM, van Koetsveld PM, Achilefu S, Houtsmuller AB, Pols DHJ, et al. . Expression of somatostatin, cortistatin, and somatostatin receptors in human monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003; 285: E344–E353. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00048.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Gasecki AP, Eliasziw M, Ferguson GG, Hachinski V, Barnett HJM, _ _. Long-Term prognosis and effect of endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis and contralateral carotid stenosis or occlusion: results from NASCET. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 778–82. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.5.0778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European carotid surgery trial (ECST. The Lancet 1998; 351: 1379–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. The Lancet 2004; 363: 915–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15785-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, Charles SM, Fail T, Humphries K, et al. . Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2009; 37: 251–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, et al. . ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of cardiology Foundation/American heart association Task force on practice guidelines, and the American stroke association, American association of neuroscience nurses, American association of neurological Surgeons, American College of radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of neurological Surgeons, society of atherosclerosis imaging and prevention, Society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of interventional radiology, society of NeuroInterventional surgery, Society for vascular medicine, and Society for vascular surgery developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology and society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 2011: e16–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Spence JD, Naylor AR, Endarterectomy NAR. Endarterectomy, stenting, or neither for asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1087–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1600123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Forsythe RO, Newby DE, Robson JMJ. Monitoring the biological activity of abdominal aortic aneurysms Beyond Ultrasound. Heart 2016; 102: 817–24. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Duddalwar VA. Multislice CT angiography: a practical guide to CT angiography in vascular imaging and intervention. Br J Radiol 2004; 77(suppl_1): S27–S38. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25652856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Castrucci M, Mellone R, Vanzulli A, De Gaspari A, Castellano R, Astore D, et al. . Mural thrombi in abdominal aortic aneurysms: MR imaging characterization--useful before endovascular treatment? Radiology 1995; 197: 135–9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.1.7568811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Nguyen VL, Leiner T. Hellenthal F A. MVI, Backes wh, Wishaupt MCJ, van der Geest RJ, et al. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with High Thrombus Signal Intensity on Magnetic Resonance Imaging are Associated with High Growth Rate. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg 2014;. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Derlin T, Tóth Z, Papp L, Wisotzki C, Apostolova I, Habermann CR, et al. . Correlation of inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET, active mineral deposition assessed by 18F-fluoride PET, and vascular calcification in atherosclerotic plaque: a dual-tracer PET/CT study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2011; 52: 1020–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.087452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Janssen T, Bannas P, Herrmann J, Veldhoen S, Busch JD, Treszl A, et al. . Association of linear 18F-sodium fluoride accumulation in femoral arteries as a measure of diffuse calcification with cardiovascular risk factors: a PET/CT study. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2013; 20: 569–77. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9680-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chhatriwalla AK, Nicholls SJ, Nissen SE. The asteroid trial: coronary plaque regression with high-dose statin therapy. Future Cardiol 2006; 2: 651–4. doi: 10.2217/14796678.2.6.651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Brown BG, Ganz P, Vogel RA, et al. . Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA 2004; 291: 1071–80. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.9.1071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Okazaki S, Yokoyama T, Miyauchi K, Shimada K, Kurata T, Sato H, et al. . Early statin treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: demonstration of the beneficial effect on atherosclerotic lesions by serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis during half a year after coronary event: the establish study. Circulation 2004; 110: 1061–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Underhill HR, Yuan C, Zhao X-Q, Kraiss LW, Parker DL, Saam T, et al. . Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on carotid plaque morphology and composition in moderately hypercholesterolemic patients: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging trial. Am Heart J 2008; 155: 584.e1–584.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhao X-Q, Dong L, Hatsukami T, Phan BA, Chu B, Moore A, et al. . Mr imaging of carotid plaque composition during lipid-lowering therapy: a prospective assessment of effect and time course. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 977–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tang TY, Howarth SP, Miller SR, Graves MJ, Patterson AJ, Jean-Marie U, et al. . The atheroma (atorvastatin therapy: effects on reduction of macrophage activity) study: evaluation using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in carotid disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 2039–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Apperson-Hansen C, Wang C, Wolski K, Lin S, et al. . Determinants of arterial wall remodeling during lipid-lowering therapy: serial intravascular ultrasound observations from the reversal of atherosclerosis with aggressive lipid lowering therapy (reversal) trial. Circulation 2006; 113: 2826–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zimarino M, Angeramo F, Prasad A, Ruggieri B, Malatesta S, Prati F, et al. . Reduction of atherothrombotic burden before stent deployment in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: reduction of myocardial necrosis achieved with nose-dive manual thrombus aspiration (remnant) trial. A volumetric intravascular ultrasound study. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 2016; 88: 716–25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Fayad ZA, Mani V, Woodward M, Kallend D, Abt M, Burgess T, et al. . Safety and efficacy of dalcetrapib on atherosclerotic disease using novel non-invasive multimodality imaging (dal-PLAQUE): a randomised clinical trial. The Lancet 2011; 378: 1547–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61383-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]