1.
Dear Editors,
Perianal injuries are uncommon but often occur following trauma, fire, and accidents. These injuries usually lead to a rectal injury. We report an interesting case of a perianal injury by a rebar that did not cause a rectal injury. The present case had a unique set of challenges for physicians and led to experience with wound management.
A 33‐year‐old man presented to the emergency room with a perianal injury that occurred 1 hour earlier. The man fell from the third floor of a work site and was impaled on a rebar. Workmates found the man and cut the rebar at the base. The injured man was immediately transported to our hospital. The man was healthy without any medical diseases. On physical examination, the following parameters were recorded: temperature, 36.8°C; heart rate, 110/min; respiratory rate, 22/min; blood pressure, 115/75 mm Hg; and oxygen saturation, 97%. The rebar had pierced the perianal tissue on the right aspect of the anus towards the ramus ischiopubicusta (Figure 1). X‐rays of the pelvis showed the depth of the rebar (Figure 2), and computed tomography indicated a normal peritoneal cavity. Based on the collective physical examination and imaging findings, emergency surgery was performed. The patient was carefully placed in the lithotomy position without moving the rebar (Figure 3). The severity of the rebar injury and exact position were unknown. The anal tissue was incised around the edge of the musculus sphincter ani externus, and the rebar was removed with extreme care (Figure 4). We then explored the depth of the injury along the path of the rebar. The ramus ischiopubicusta was fractured. The patient received a tetanus vaccine and antibodies and recovered shortly thereafter.
Figure 1.
A rebar impaled the perianal tissue
Figure 2.
X‐rays of the pelvis demonstrating the rebar
Figure 3.
The patient in the lithotomy position with a rebar in situ
Figure 4.
The length of the rebar
Impalement injuries are common in the emergency room; however, rebar impalement injuries, as in the current case, are rare. In the current case, it was a wise decision to cut the rebar at the base. Akhil et al1 concluded that taking the patient directly to the operating room is better than first trimming the rebar. Other reports also suggest that minimal manipulation of the impaling object is crucial and recommend cutting the impaling object at the ends to facilitate transport of the patient. 2, 3
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 81701965, 81872255; Key medical talents fund of Jiangsu Province, Grant/Award Numbers: 2016KJQWZDRC‐03; Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, Grant/Award Number: 20180550116; 333 High‐level Talents Training Project of Jiangsu Province, Grant/Award Number: BRA2016508; the Six Talents Peak Foundation of Jiangsu Province Project，Grant/Award Number: WSW041; Dalian Medical Science Research Project Grant/Award Number: 1711038.
Zhe Fan and Yingyi Zhang contributed equally to this study.
Contributor Information
Juan Liu, Email: liujuannj@outlook.com.
Yewei Zhang, Email: zhangyewei@njmu.edu.cn.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sarwark JP, Mccarthy DM, Pearce C, et al. Leg and abdominal impalement with rebar. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):1110.e1‐1110.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Golder SK, Friess H, Shafighi M, Kleeff JH, Buchler MW. A chair leg as the rare cause of a transabdominal impalement with duodenal and pancreatic involvement. J Trauma. 2001;51(1):164‐167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sawhney C, D'Souza N, Mishra B, Gupta B, Das S. Management of a massive thoracoabdominal impalement: a case report. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]