Abstract
Reprogrammed metabolism is an important hallmark of cancer cells. Pyruvate kinase (PK) is one of the major rate-limiting enzymes in glucose metabolism. The M2 isoform of PK (PKM2), is considered to be an important marker of metabolic reprogramming and one of the key enzymes. Recently, through the continuous development of genome-wide analysis and functional studies, accumulating evidence has demonstrated that long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) play vital regulatory roles in cancer progression by acting as either potential oncogenes or tumor suppressors. Furthermore, several studies have shown that up-regulation of PKM2 in cancer tissues is associated with LncRNAs expression and patient survival. Thus, scientists have begun to unveil the mechanism of LncRNA-associated PKM2 in cancer metabolic progression. Based on these novel findings, in this mini-review, we summarize the detailed molecular mechanisms of LncRNA related to PKM2 in cancer metabolism. We expect that this work will promote a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of PKM2, and provide a profound potential for targeting PKM2 to treat tumors.
Keywords: cancer targeting, LncRNA, mechanisms, PKM2
Introduction
In the field of tumor research, much attention has recently been paid to the metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells. A key feature in metabolic reprogramming is glucose metabolism—an important life process that provides energy and nutritional resources for organisms and their individual cells. A characteristic that differentiates cancer cells from normal cells is metabolic regulation, with a hallmark of tumor cells being a shift from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis-dependent metabolism, even in aerobic conditions. Cancer cell metabolism is characterized by increased glycolysis and lactic acid production instead of increased aerobic respiration. This phenomenon is known as aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg effect [1]. Pyruvate kinase (PK) is one of the main rate-limiting enzymes and physiologically irreversible step in glycolysis, which converts phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) into ADP by the phosphate group transfer to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and pyruvate [2]. PK has four isoforms: L, R, M1 and M2. PKL is mainly expressed in the liver, while PKR in red blood cells; both are encoded by PKRl. PKM1 is expressed in many types of normal tissue, whereas M2 isoform of PK (PKM2) is particularly expressed in highly proliferating cells; both isoforms are encoded by PKM [3]. PKM2 is an important rate-limiting enzyme in glycolysis during glucose metabolism.
The function and regulation of PKM2
In the early 1980s, the functional study of PKM2 was initiated by the identification of a candidate gene in mouse [4]. Noguchi et al. [5] showed that PKM1 and PKM2 are encoded by the same PKM gene. The alternative splicing of PKM mRNA produces PKM1 or PKM2, which depends on the mutually exclusive selection of exon 9 or 10 [6]. A switch from the PKM1 to PKM2 of mRNA splicing is enhanced by c-Myc oncogene, it indicated that cancer cells actively engage in this transformation to meet their needs for proliferation and metabolism [7]. In addition, the change of the PKM1 to the PKM2 isoform in various cancers is based on the study of the relative abundance of PKM1 and PKM2 in normal and tumor tissues [8,9]. PKM2 isoform oscillates from high to low PK activity (that is, from tetramer to dimer form). The dimeric form of PKM2, also known as low PK activity, can produce several glycolytic intermediates that serve as building blocks for the biosynthesis of amino acids, lipids and nucleotides. During the expression of spliced PKM1, that the PKM2 deletion is inhibited by controlling exon 9 usually maintains low PK activity induced by normal growth signal [10]. Zhou et al. [11] found that PKM2 levels can serve as a predictor to determine whether a cancer is non-invasive or highly aggressive. Based on this, the dominance of dimeric form of PKM2 provides a metabolic advantage for cancer cell proliferation.
PKM2, when activated by PEP and PEP or fructose 2,6-bisphosphate, converts PEP into ADP by transferring phosphate group, thereby producing ATP and pyruvate to catalyze the physiological irreversible step in glycolysis [12]. During this process, PEP and ATP bind to the active site with a mechanism promoted by cationic K+ and Mg2+ or Mn2+ [13,14]. The PKM gene encodes the PKM1 and PKM2 isoforms. Although PKM1 and PKM2 catalyze the same reaction in glycolysis, they also differ in that PKM1 has constitutively high catalytic activity, while PKM2 is allosterically regulated [15]. By the virtue of constinuous study of the allosteric regulation of PKM2, accumulating evidence suggests that ATP, oxalate, alanine and phenylalanine can act as allosteric inhibitors of PKM2. These inhibitors block the allosteric regulation of PKM2 through various mechanisms [16–18]. In contrast, serine, a specific PKM2 activator, often binds to each monomer to promote the formation of the active tetramer [19]. Furthermore, it has been reported that SAICAR (succinylaminoimidazolecarboxamide ribose-5′-phosphate), intermediate product through the process of de novo purine nucleotide synthesis, which specifically stimulates PKM2 and then promotes cancer cell survival [19].
PKM2 post-translational modifications
Phosphorylation
Phosphorylation, one of the major post-translational modification of PKM2, either activates or inactivates PKM2. It was found that PKM2 is phosphorylated by Tyr105 via oncogenic tyrosine kinase or combined with tyrosine phosphorylation peptide after growth factor intervention, which reduces the pyruvate activity of PKM2 and change energy production to anabolic processes during glucose metabolism [20]. Cheng et al. [21] found that PKM2 directly phosphorylated PAK2 at Ser20, Ser141 and Ser192/197 via binding and kinase assays in vitro. Further research has shown that knocking out PAK2 in PDKM2 overexpressing PDAC cells diminished mobility in vitro in cell and metastatic ability in vivo. The phosphorylation of PKM2 on Thr454 increases A549 proliferation and decreases mitochondrial function [22]. In addition, Chen et al. [23] proved that tripartite motif-containing protein 35 (TRIM35) through the blockade of PKM2 Y105 phosphorylation suppresses the tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells.
O-GlcNAcylation
O-GlcNAcylation is a post-translational modification involving the attachment of O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) moieties to cytoplasmic, nuclear and mitochondrial proteins to regulate fundamental cellular processes in metazoans [24]. The science in 2012 years has reported that phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK1), as a major regulatory enzyme controls flux through glycolysis, which has been shown to regulate cell metabolism via O-GlcNAcylation [25]. Recently, Singh et al. [26] found that O-GlcNAcylation promotes aerobic glycolysis and tumor growth by inhibiting PKM2 catalytic activity. Wang et al. [27] identified that a post-translational modification on PKM2, O-GlcNAcylation, which destabilized the active tetrameric PKM2, reduced PK activity, and led to nuclear translocation of PKM2.
Other post-translational modifications
In addition to phosphorylation and O’GlcNAcylation, which regulates the activity of PKM2, PKM2 can also be modified by other post-translational modifications, including acetylation [28], succinylation [29] and methylation [30]. For instance, under normal glucose conditions, deacetylated hnRNP A1 reduced PKM2 in HCC cells and increased PKM1 alternative splicing, resulting in decreased metabolic activity of PK [31]. At the same time, succinylation of PKM2 at Lysine 498 (K498) increases its activity [32].
The regulation of PKM2 by signaling pathway
Several signaling pathway and transcription factor have been reported to regulate the expression of PKM2. PKM2 induces downstream metabolism and proliferation-related gene expression by activating transcriptional cofactors of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α (HIF-1α) and β-catenin [33]. It acts as a protein kinase in the nucleus and directly phosphorylates STAT3 and histone H3 to promote tumor transformation [34,35]. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is found to be activated in the tumor cells. mTOR, as a central activator of the Warburg effect, which induces PKM2 in many kinds of human tissues and cell lines. Furthermore, inhibition of mTOR also reduces the expression of PKM2 [36]. Our previous studies showed abnormally high expression of PKM2 in bladder cancer and elucidated the molecular mechanism of its regulation of the rapid proliferation and drug resistance of the cancer [37,38]. Based on these findings, PKM2 has been identified as a potential target for cancer diagnosis and treatment.
The role of PKM2 in cancer metabolism
A significant feature of cancer cell metabolism is the increase in glycolysis. PKM2, as an important rate-limiting enzyme in glycolysis, plays an important role in tumor metabolism. In the last decade, more and more researches have focused on the metabolism of PKM2 in tumor. On one hand, PKM2 increases the synthesis of lactate and macromolecules to promote tumor proliferation via exhibiting low PK activity and nuclear moon-lightening functions. On the other hand, PKM2, not only can act as a protein kinase but as a transcriptional co-activator of genes, involved in cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis. PKM2 leads to increases in glucose utilization [39] and changes in redox balance [40] of tumor cells when it is up-regulated. Thus, PKM2 serves multiple functions that are closely related to cancer development and metastasis. Based on these findings, PKM2 is positioned as a potential target for cancer therapy.
Long non-coding RNAs
Long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) are defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides that are not translated into protein [41]. They can monitor immune cell development [42] and other biological processes, possibly by interacting with proteins and RNAs [43]. In recent years, there have been accumulating reports of dysregulated LncRNA expression in various cancers, suggesting that LncRNAs may act as carcinogenic or anti-cancer factors [44]. Furthermore, it has been shown that LncRNAs are key regulators of cancer metabolism [45,46], and several LncRNAs have been implicated in the development of cancer, including LINC01554, LINC00689, MAFG-AS1, highly up-regulated in liver cancer gene (HULC), FEZF1 antisense RNA 1 (FEZF1-AS1), lincRNA-p21, MEG3, HOXB cluster antisense RNA 3 (HOXB-AS3), tumor protein 53 target gene 1 (TP53TG1) and lncRNA regulator of reprogramming (linc-RoR) [47]. Interestingly, the LncRNA CRNDE has been shown to promote metabolic changes by switching the metabolism of cancer cells to aerobic glycolysis [48], establishing a novel relationship between LncRNA and glycolysis.
However, the detailed molecular mechanisms involved in LncRNAs and glycolysis remain unclear. In this mini-review, we summarize several novel molecular mechanisms in which LncRNAs are associated with PKM2 in cancer metabolism. We expect that a better understanding of the various underlying molecular mechanisms will help clarify the role of PKM2 in tumors, establishing a solid mechanistic foundation for tumor therapy targeted at PKM2.
LncRNAs associated with PKM2 expression
HULC
The gene that is most up-regulated in HCC is HULC, a novel mRNA-like LncRNA. Emerging evidence suggests that HULC accelerates the development of hepatocarcinogenesis and deregulates lipid metabolism in HCC cells [49]. It is expected that HULC has the potential to become a cancer biomarker.
It is well established that metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells is driven by the activation of oncogenes or the loss of tumor suppression. Phosphate and tension homology deleted on chromsome ten (PTEN), a tumor suppressor gene, was identified by three groups in 1997 [50]. Chen et al. found that PTEN overexpression inhibited the phosphorylation of protein kinase B (AKT) and reduced the expression level of PKM2 [51]. PTEN was also shown to play a critical role in regulating the proliferation of cervical cancer cells [51]. In a recent study, Xin et al. [52] reported that HULC activates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in human liver cancer by inhibiting the expression of PTEN, depending on autophagy. They discovered that abnormally high expression of HULC in liver cancer cells reduced the expression of PTEN and increased the expression of PKM2 [53].
There is accumulating evidence that LncRNAs in competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks play a key role in tumor survival. MicroRNAs silence genes through binding to mRNAs and ceRNAs [37]. Wang et al. [54] reported evidence that HULC acts as an endogenous ‘sponge,’ inhibiting the activity of miR-372 through a ceRNA that induces the translational de-repression of PRKACB. Furthermore, miR-372 enhances the expression and activity of PKM2 via the β-catenin–LEF/TCF4 pathway, implying it has a critical role in bridging the relationship between PKM2 and HULC [55]. These results have revealed a new mechanism for interactions involving RNAs and the HULC/PKM2 axis. This cell signaling pathway could provide a novel focus for exploring therapeutic candidates for cancer treatment.
LincRNA-p21
Long intergenic non-coding RNA (LincRNA)-p21, one of the LncRNAs regulated by p53, is a repressor of p53-dependent transcriptional responses [56]. There is increasing evidence that lincRNA-p21 plays vital roles in various cancers. In microglia cells, the overexpression of lincRNA-p21 was found to be sufficient to increase PKC-δ, which in turn further enhanced the expression of p53 and lincRNA-p21, resulting in lipopolysaccharide-induced p53/lincRNA-p21 expression [57]. LincRNA-p21 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells by activating the transforming growth factor β 1 (TGF-β1) signaling pathway, and it plays a role in thoracic aortic aneurysms [58]. Interestingly, when PKM2 was knocked down, this substantially inhibited the tumorigenesis and proliferation of prostate cancer cells in which lincRNA-p21 had been silenced [59].
There is clear evidence of associations between PKM1 and PKM2 and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway [60]. For example, it has been reported that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR cascade is a stimulatory factor for PKM2 and an important oncogenic signaling pathway in prostate cancer [61]. Sun et al. [62] discovered that, under normal conditions, mTOR was a major positive regulator of the Warburg effect in both cancer and benign tumor cells. In vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed that mTOR can act as a positive regulator of PKM2 expression. For example, kidney tumor samples from a tuberous sclerosis complex mouse model (using Tsc2del3/+ mice), in which the expression of mTOR had increased, exhibited robustly elevated PKM2 expression [62]. Consistent with this, PKM2 expression was shown to be reduced when human malignant cell lines were treated with rapamycin, a potent inhibitor of mTOR [63]. Our group recently discovered that the phosphorylation of both AKT and mTOR was significantly reduced when PKM2 was knocked down or following treatment with shikonin, a PKM2 inhibitor [38]. When the expression of PKM2 was normal or silent, the levels of phosphorylated AKT and mTOR decreased under the action of the AKT inhibitor MK2206, revealing a novel relationship between PKM2 and the AKT pathway [38].
Yang et al. [64] demonstrated that the induction of lincRNA-p21 by hypoxia is an essential part of hypoxia-enhanced glycolysis. They found that low levels of lincRNA-p21 significantly reversed the cellular metabolic changes induced by hypoxia. To explore the relationship between glycolysis and lincRNA-p21, Wang et al. [65] established a xenograft tumor model in nude mice by injecting them with lincRNA-p21-silenced DU145 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells that expressed PKM2 (or control) shRNA. They found that the inhibition of PKM2 significantly reduced tumorigenesis and the progression of the LNCaP cells. Consistent with this, the tumorigenic capacity of the lincRNA-p21 DU145 cells was blunted after targeting PKM2 [65]. In addition, the overexpression of lincRNA-p21 in DU145 and LNCaP cells reduced the level of PKM2, confirming that lincRNA-p21 is a negative regulator of PKM2. These results demonstrate that the regulatory mechanism of PKM2 mediated by LincRNA-p21 depends on the PTEN/AKT/mTOR cascade [65].
Gain-of-function p53 mutations often occur in human tumors, promoting tumor development. In a comprehensive analysis of nucleotide levels, Stone et al. [66] showed that PKM2 knockdown reduced the relative levels of N-carbamoyl aspartate, UTP and dTTP, and impaired the incorporation of glucose-derived carbon into UTP, whereas silencing p53 increased the levels of these metabolites. According to the results of a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9-based loss-of-function proliferation rescue screen in PKM2-silenced cells, Kim et al. [67] found that the p53 gene, a tumor suppressor, scored the top one hits among more than 20000 genes detected. Furthermore, they further demonstrated that PKM2 inhibited the expression and function of p53 in proliferating endothelial cells (ECs), preventing it from inducing growth arrest at multiple points in the cell cycle [67]. Of interest, lincRNA-p21 has been shown to inhibit many genes in a p53-dependent transcriptional response [68]. Targeting glycolysis could be a therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer patients with low expression of lincRNA-p21. Wang et al. [67] also found that PKM2 expression, glucose consumption and lactate production remained unchanged when p53 was overexpressed in DU145 cells in which lincRNA-p21 was silenced by shRNA, which indicated that lincRNA-p21 negatively regulated aerobic glycolysis independent of p53 signaling.
LncRNA maternally expressed gene 3
LncRNA maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3) is a maternal imprinting gene which is located at human chromosome 14q32. Its length is 85, approximately 1.6 kb [69]. Surprisingly, in contrast with other LncRNAs, there is increasing evidence that LncRNA MEG3 is down-regulated in various types of tumors, and low levels of MEG3 are associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients [70]. MEG3 may therefore play an important role in the development of cancers.
The overexpression of MEG3 has been shown to promote the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with multiple myelomas through targeting BMP4 transcription [71]. Wu et al. [72] reported that double mutant p53 (N340Q/L344R) promoted hepatocarcinogenesis mediated by PKM2. MEG3 regulates genes in the TGF-β pathway by forming RNA–DNA triple structures [73]. TGF-β is a cytokine that mediates a variety of cellular responses, including the suppression of cell proliferation and reaction of differentiation, ageing and apoptosis [74]. Chen et al. [75] found, after PKM2 knockdown in HCC cells, not only increases in the expression of the TGF-β receptor 1 gene and Smad2/3 phosphorylation levels, but also a significant decrease in the phosphorylation of Smad2 in HCC. These results suggest close associations between PKM2 and the Smad and TGF-β pathways during HCC migration and invasion processes.
PKM2 has a critical function in tumor metabolism and growth [76]. In addition, it has been reported that PKM2 plays crucial roles in the growth, survival and migration of tumors [77]. Importantly, miR-122 regulates tumor metabolism, reversing drug-fastness and hepatotoxicity damage in HCC [78]. Zheng et al. [79] for the first time demonstrated that, in hepatocarcinogenesis, MEG3 negatively regulated the activity of PKM2 and the β-catenin signaling pathway as a tumor suppressor, reducing the expression and nuclear location of PKM2 in an miR-122-dependent fashion. Furthermore, they showed that the overexpression of MEG3 enhanced the expression of CTCF, CREB, H3K9me3, H3K36me3, and RNA polII in the miR-122 promoter region, as well as significantly increasing the loading of pre-miR-122 and mature miR-122. Importantly, miR-122 inhibited the activity of luciferase bearing the PKM2 3′-untranslated region (UTR), demonstrating that miR-122 can target the 3′-UTR of PKM2 and reduce its expression [79].
Linc-RoR
Linc-RoR was originally identified as a reprogrammable regulator of induced pluripotent stem cells [80], but in recent years there have been numerous reports of the molecular mechanisms of linc-RoR in tumors. Lnc-RoR regulates the expression of core transcription factors by acting as a microRNA sponge in the self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells [81]. Furthermore, linc-RoR can promote estrogen-independent growth of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer by activating ERK, which in turn phosphorylates ERs at Ser118, promoting the ligand-independent activation of ERs [82]. Lnc-RoR is dramatically unregulated in triple-negative breast cancer, promoting cell invasion via the miR-145/ARF6 pathway [83]. Interestingly, Li et al. [84] reported that inhibiting linc-RoR in pancreatic cancer could reduce the expression of PKM2, partly through switching PKM2 to PKM1. This switch was evidenced by targeting polypyrimidine tract bindings (PTBs), which are pivotal regulators of PKM splicing. Interestingly, a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay demonstrated that linc-RoR and miR-124 interacted directly. Furthermore, miR-124 overexpression significantly reduced levels of PTBP1, suggesting that PTBP1 might be critical in the potential relationship between miR-124 and PKM2 [84].
Lnc-RoR can also regulate the expression of target genes using the ceRNA mechanism. Takahashi et al. [85] reported that linc-RoR cannot directly interact with HIF-1α mRNA because it has no sequence complementary to HIF-1α. However, linc-RoR can be used as a ceRNA to adsorb miR-145; it then mediates the expression of HIF-1α mRNA through miR-145 [86]. Based on the results of chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, Luo et al. [87] confirmed that PKM2 bound directly to HIF-1α and not to HIF-2α, demonstrating the support favoring an interaction between PKM2 and HIF-1α. Li et al. [88] further reported that reactive oxygen species (ROS) promoted insulin-induced glycolysis and PKM2 expression in HCC, indicating that insulin up-regulates PKM2 expression in an ROS-dependent manner via miR-145 suppression. Interestingly, based on the results from 31 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissue samples paired with adjacent normal tissue, Chen et al. [84] reported a negative correlation between linc-RoR and miR-124 levels, and that the presence of two 8-mer binding sites among miR-124 and linc-RoR may be critical for this. Thus, the linc-RoR/miR-124/PKM2 axis may provide a novel molecular pathway for exploring the relationship between lincRNA and PKM2 in tumors.
LncRNA FEZF1-AS1
FEZF1-AS1 is an LncRNA recently identified via LncRNA microarrays in colorectal cancer (CRC). Analysis of the FEZF1 gene sequence has shown that it is located on chromosome 7 of the FEZF1 opposite strand [89]. FEZF1-AS1 has been shown to play a key role in the proliferation and growth of gastric cancer cells via transcriptional activation of the K-ras gene [90].
Wang et al. reported that down-regulation of FEZF1-AS1 repressed the migration and invasion of HCC cells through the inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 axis-mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition [91]. Interestingly, our group has demonstrated that silencing PKM2 inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation, suggesting a close association between PKM2 and STAT3 [37]. Recently, Ye et al. [92] reported that reducing the expression of FEZF1-AS1 or ZNF312b inhibited glycolysis, glucose uptake and lactic acid production in prostate cancer cells, indicating a relationship between the FEZF1-AS1/miR-107/ZNF312B pathway and the Warburg effect. FEZF1-AS1 can bind PKM2 protein, increasing its stability. Increased cytoplasmic and nuclear PKM2 levels have been shown to promote PK activity and lactate production, with FEZF1-AS1-induced nuclear PKM2 up-regulation in turn activating STAT3 signaling [93]. Thus, FEZF1-AS1/PKM2/STAT3 signaling could be a promising novel therapeutic target in cancer treatment.
Other LncRNAs
MAFG-AS1, a novel LncRNA, is located in the region of chromosome 17q25.3 in which some differentially expressed genes of are embedded [94]. It shares a head-to-head promoter with MAFG, which induces the methylator phenotype of CpG islands and CRC tumorigenesis [95]. Recently, Cui et al. [96] reported LncRNA MAFG-AS1 to be a novel oncogenic LncRNA that inhibited the growth and development of CRC. The underlying mechanism for this effect may be that it acts as a sponge for miR-147b, resulting in the down-regulation of PDK1, PFK1 and PKM2 [96].
TP53TG1, a p53-induced LncRNA, has been shown to play a key role in the development of human cancer [97]. The knockdown of TP53TG1 significantly inhibited the migration ability of U87 cells under treatment with various levels of glucose, whereas the overexpression of TP53TG1 enhanced the expression of IDH1 and reduced the expression of PKM2 in glioma cells [97]. These results suggest that TP53TG1 may promote cell proliferation and migration by affecting the expression of genes related to glucose metabolism in glioma cells when there is glucose deficiency [98].
Recently, Huang et al. [99] reported that HOXB-AS3 encodes a conserved 53-amino acid small peptide, previously considered to be a novel human LncRNA. They found a positive correlation between levels of the HOXB-AS3 peptide and levels of PKM2 mRNA in sample tissues, but a negative correlation with PKM1 [99]. The HOXB-AS3 peptide suppressed CRC growth through blocking hnRNPA1-mediated PKM splicing, thereby inhibiting the formation PKM2 and suppressing the reprogramming of the glucose metabolism; this suggests that PKM2-associated HOXB-AS3 has a role in tumor formation and progression [99].
LINC01554 was first defined as a tumor suppressor in HCC, whose downexpression could serve as potential prognostic biomarker for HCC patients [100]. Zheng et al. [100], by in vitro and in vivo functional assays, indicated that LINC01554 exerted tumor-suppressive function and blocked aerobic glycolysis. Furthermore, they further showed that LINC01554 down-regulation empowers cancer cells acquiring high aerobic glycolysis to sustain cells growth advantages via regulating PKM2 and Akt/mTOR signaling pathway [100]. In previous studies, it reported that LINC01554 was associated with fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and survival of esophageal carcinoma patients [101,102].
As another representative, LINC00689 was recognized as an obesity-related gene in Northern Han Chinese in previous study [103]. The recent study revealed that LINC00689 is a LncRNA identified to be markedly elevated in glioma to normal brain tissues. In U251 and U87 cells, both in vitro and in vivo assays demonstrated that LINC00689 promotes the proliferation, migration, invasion and glycolysis via directly interacting with miR-338-3p to promote PKM2 expression. In addition, Liu et al. [103] demonstrated that the knockdown of LINC00689 represses the proliferation, migration, invasion and glycolysis of both U251 and U87 cells, while PKM2 expression was restored in U251 cells knocked down by LINC00689.
Discussion
Metabolic reprogramming has been widely recognized as a functional marker of cancer cells and plays an extremely important role in growth and proliferation of cancer cells. Therefore, exploring metabolic reprogramming may be an efficient approach to explore potential targets in cancer treatment. PKM2 has been shown to have a critical role in cancer cell metabolism. Revealing functions and regulatory effects of PKM2 have markedly improved our understanding of central role of PKM2 in tumor growth in the past decade. Furthermore, compelling evidence regarding the expression, localization, post-translational modification and allosteric regulation of PKM2 has been collected. With the rapid development of high-throughput analysis and gene editing, evidence from whole genome and transcriptome sequencing suggest that the complexity of an organism may be precisely regulated by short or LncRNAs which belong to the noncoding portions of the genome [104]. In this mini-review, we summarized the recent understanding of the molecular mechanisms of PKM2-associated LncRNAs, including MAFG-AS1, HULC, FEZF1-AS1, LincRNA-p21, MEG3, HOXB-AS3, TP53TG1 and Linc-ROR in cancer metabolism. Simultaneously, we also deliberate how LncRNAs regulate the functions of PKM2 and which pathways are involved in these processes, shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of LncRNA-correlated PKM2 regulation network.
On the one hand, several LncRNAs (green) regulate PKM2 expression via affecting cell signaling pathways (blue). (1) HULC and LincRNA-p21 activate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in human liver cancer by inhibiting the expression of PTEN and PKM2. Furthermore, LINC01554 down-regulation empowers cancer cells acquiring high aerobic glycolysis via regulating PKM2 and Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. (2) LincRNA-p21 negatively regulated aerobic glycolysis independent of p53 signaling. (3) MEG3 regulates genes in the TGF-β pathway by forming RNA–DNA triple structures. In additional, PKM2 knockdown increases the expression of the TGF-β1 gene in HCC cells. MEG3 promotes the expression and maturation of miR122 which targets PKM2. On the other hand, several LncRNAs such as HULC, MEG3, lincROR, MAFG-ASI and LINC00689 regulate PKM2 expression by targeting miRNAs (gray).
As discussed above, major molecular mechanisms are involved in the regulation of PKM2 by LncRNA in cancer development and treatment, which are classified into conventional molecular signaling pathways including PTEN-PI3K-Akt-mTOR and P53, protein alternative splicing, and miRNA-associated ceRNA mechanisms. PTEN-PI3K-Akt-mTOR is one of the most typical cell metabolism-associated pathways.
As mentioned above, HULC, one of important LncRNAs, reduces the expression of PTEN and enhances the expression of PKM2 in liver cancer cells. The activated PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway by HIF-1-induced transcriptional enhancement and c-Myc-dependent hnRNPs increases the expression of PKM2 [62]. PKM2 is an important target molecule of mTOR downstream, and excessive activation of mTOR will promote the expression of PKM2. The studies have reported that down-regulation of PKM2 expression can attenuate cell tumorigenicity caused by mTOR activation [105]. As shown in this review, LincRNA-p21 is a negative regulator of PKM2 and this regulatory mechanism is dependent on PTEN/AKT/mTOR cascade. In contrast, HULC activates AKT-PI3K-mTOR signaling pathway through reducing the expression of PTEN, depending on autophagy in human liver cancer. The molecular mechanisms that LncRNAs regulate PKM2 expression via PTEN and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathways in mediating tumor growth are briefly summarized in Figure 2.
Figure 2. LncRNAs regulate PKM2 expression to inhibit cancer cell metabolism via PTEN and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathway.
(A) MEG3 promotes β-catenin degradation through a PTEN-dependent ubiquitin–proteasome system. Thus, MEG3 inhibits β-catenin activity through PKM2 reduction and PTEN increase. (B) LincRNA-p21 is a negative regulator of PKM2. The regulatory mechanism of PKM2 mediated by LincRNA-p21 depends on the PTEN/AKT/mTOR cascade. (C) When HULC is overexpressed, HULC increases autophagy by increasing the expression of LC3I and LC3II. At the same time, HULC enhances the interaction between LC3 and ATG3. Thus, HULC inhibits PTEN through enhancing the cellular autophagy by increasing ubiquitin–proteasome dependent LC3II. The result is activation of the AKT-PI3K-mTOR pathway to inhibit tumor cell growth and metabolism when PTEN is reduced, based on inhibition of PTEN in liver cancer cells. Strikingly, HULC reduced the expression of PTEN, β-catenin and increased the expression of PKM2 in hematoma cells.
Furthermore, the differential splicing of PKM, another unique feature different from regular pathways, plays a novel role in cancer cell metabolism. As stated above, hnRNPA1, hnRNPA2 and PTB regulate differential splicing of PKM. PTB regulates energy metabolism in cancer cells through selective splicing of PKM2. Both HIF-1α-mediated PKM gene transcription and selective cleavage of PKM precursor mediated by c-Myc and hnRNPs influence mTOR activation and tumorigenicity [62]. As the protooncogene and the transcription factor, c-Myc can up-regulate hnRNPs, promoting the expression of PKM2 in tumors. Moreover, HOXB-AS3 peptide attenuated the increase in PKM2 expression by overexpressing hnRNP A1. Thus, these precise molecular mechanisms used to define the roles of PKM splicing and subsequent PKM2 formation on tumor initiation and development provide a new direction for exploring the relationship between PKM2 and LncRNAs (Figure 3).
Figure 3. HnRNPA1, hnRNPA2 and PTB regulated differential splicing of PKM.
HnRNPs inhibit the cleavage of PKM mRNA by binding to exon 9, resulting in exon 9 exclusion and exon 10 inclusion and then generating PKM2. (A) The HOXB-AS3 peptide blocks hnRNPA1-mediated PKM splicing, thereby inhibits the formation of PKM2. (B) In contrast, lnc-RoR inhibits miR-145 and then reduces the switching of PKM1 to PKM2 via targeting PTBs. Switching from PKM1 to PKM2 promotes aerobic glycolysis and provides a selective advantage of normal cells to tumor formation.
Finally, miRNAs, a class of endogenous non-coding single-stranded RNA molecules, bound by the 3′-UTR of a target messenger RNA with a protein-coding gene and mediate post-transcriptional gene expression [106]. Moreover, recent studies have proved that several LncRNAs regulate activities of miRNA through ceRNA mechanisms, which act as an endogenous ‘sponge’ [107]. In this review, we discussed several profound findings that LncRNAs, including Linc-ROR, MEG3 and HULC regulate activities of miRNA through ceRNA mechanisms and regulate the expression of PKM2.
Perspectives
In summary, PKM2 has been confirmed that it is inextricably linked to the development and prognosis of human malignant tumors, particularly related to cancer cell metabolism. Investigating molecular mechanisms of LncRNAs targeting PKM2 is becoming a newly recognized hot research area. Exploring the role of PKM2-associated LncRNAs in cancer cell metabolism provides a great potential for developing novel strategy to block cancer development by targeting.
Interestingly, William et al. demonstrated that lack of PKM2 can promote breast cancer progression in a Brca1-loss-driven model [108]. However, accumulating evidence suggests that PKM2 is not required for the growth or progression of most tumors, based on the recent work that mice deficient of PKM2 exhibit enhanced tumorigenesis in several experimental models [109–112]. A recent study also found that PKM2 is not required for initiation or growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tumors arising in the KP−/−C pancreatic cancer model [108]. These findings are consistent with previous results in that medulloblastoma tumors [111], colon tumor [113] and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) growth [114] do not require PKM2. Therefore, the application of PKM2 in targeted therapy of tumor has been questioned. However, due to its unique expression and regulatory mode, it remains an attractive focus in cancer research.
Abbreviations
- AKT
protein kinase B
- ARF6
ADP-ribosylation factor 6
- ceRNA
competitive endogenous RNA
- CRC
colorectal cancer
- ER
estrogen receptor
- ERK
extracellular signal-regulated kinase
- FEZF1-AS1
FEZF1 antisense RNA 1
- HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
- HIF-1α
hypoxia inducible factor-1α
- HOXB
Homeobox b gene
- HOXB-AS3
HOXB cluster antisense RNA 3
- HULC
highly up-regulated in liver cancer gene
- IDH1
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1
- LincRNA
long intergenic non-coding RNA
- linc-RoR
lncRNA regulator of reprogramming
- LncRNA
long noncoding RNA
- MEG3
maternally expressed gene 3
- mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
- O-GlcNAc
O-linked N-acetylglucosamine
- PAK2
p21-activated kinase 2
- PDAC
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- PEP
phosphoenolpyruvate
- PFK1
phosphofructokinase 1
- PK
pyruvate kinase
- PKC
protein kinase C
- PKM2
M2 isoform of PK
- PI3K
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
- PTB
polypyrimidine tract binding
- PTEN
phosphate and tension homology deleted on chromsome ten
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- TGF-β
transforming growth factor β
- TP53TG1
tumor protein 53 target gene 1
- UTR
untranslated region
Contributor Information
Ting Tao, Email: taotingxxn@163.com.
Xiaoping Yang, Email: Xiaoping.Yang@hunnu.edu.cn.
Author Contribution
Ting Tao and Shiyuan Wu wrote the manuscript. Zheng Sun provided the financial support. Wei Ma, Sichun Zhou, Jun Deng, Mei Peng, Qiongli Su revised the manuscript. Xiaoping Yang and Gaosheng Xu reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81874212]; the Key Project of Hunan Province 2016 [grant number 2016JC2036]; the Key Laboratory of Study and Discovery of Small Targeted Molecules of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University [grant number 2017TP1020]; and the Huxiang Excellent Discovery Team of Hunan Province [grant number 2018RS3072].
References
- 1.Braun A.C. (1970) On the origin of the cancer cells. Am. Sci. 58, 307–320 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Simon M.P., Besmond C., Cottreau D. et al. (1983) Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat L-type pyruvate kinase and aldolase B. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 14576–14584 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim D.J., Park Y.S. and Kim N.D. (2015) A novel pyruvate kinase M2 activator compound that suppresses lung cancer cell viability under hypoxia. Mol. Cells 38, 373–379 10.14348/molcells.2015.2314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Simon M.P., Besmond C., Cottreau D., Weber A., Chaumet-Riffaud P., Dreyfus J.C. et al. (1983) Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat L-type pyruvate kinase and aldolase B. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 14576–14584 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Noguchi T., Inoue H. and Tanaka T. (1986) The M1- and M2-type isozymes of rat pyruvate kinase are produced from the same gene by alternative RNA splicing. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 13807–13812 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.David C.J., Chen M. and Assanah M. (2009) HnRNP proteins controlled by c-Myc deregulate pyruvate kinase mRNA splicing in cancer. Nature 463, 364–368 10.1038/nature08697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cheng T.Y., Yang Y.C. and Wang H.P. (2018) Pyruvate kinase M2 promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma invasion and metastasis through phosphorylation and stabilization of PAK2 protein. Oncogene 37, 1730–1742 10.1038/s41388-017-0086-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Calabretta S., Bielli P., Passacantilli I. et al. (2016) Modulation of PKM alternative splicing by PTBP1 promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene 35, 2031–2039 10.1038/onc.2015.270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dombrauckas J.D., Santarsiero B.D. and Mesecar A.D. (2005) Structural basis for tumor pyruvate kinase M2 allosteric regulation and catalysis. Biochemistry 44, 9417. 10.1021/bi0474923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Israelsen W.J., Dayton T.L., Davidson S.M. et al. (2013) PKM2 isoform-specific deletion reveals a differential requirement for pyruvate kinase in tumor cells. Cell 155, 397–409 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou H., Wang X., Mo L. et al. (2016) Role of isoenzyme M2 of pyruvate kinase in urothelial tumorigenesis. Oncotarget 7, 23947–23960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Christofk H.R., Vander Heiden M.G., Wu N. et al. (2008) Pyruvate kinase M2 is a phosphotyrosine-binding protein. Nature 452, 181. 10.1038/nature06667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Israelsen W.J. and Vander Heiden M.G. (2015) Pyruvate kinase: function, regulation and role in cancer. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 43, 43–51 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gupta R.K. and Oesterling R.M. (1976) Dual divalent cation requirement for activation of pyruvate kinase; essential roles of both enzyme- and nucleotide-bound metal ions. Biochemistry 15, 2881–2887 10.1021/bi00658a028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ikeda Y., Tanaka T. and Noguchi T. (1997) Conversion of non-allosteric pyruvate kinase isozyme into an allosteric enzyme by a single amino acid substitution. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20495–20501 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morgan H.P., O’Reilly F.J. and Wear M.A. (2013) M2 pyruvate kinase provides a mechanism for nutrient sensing and regulation of cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 5881–5886 10.1073/pnas.1217157110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meng Y., Mcnae I.W. and Yiyuan C. (2018) An allostatic mechanism for M2 pyruvate kinase as an amino-acid sensor. Biochem. J. 475, 1821–1837 10.1042/BCJ20180171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Q., Qi X. and Jia W. (2016) 3,3′,5-triiodothyroxine inhibits apoptosis and oxidative stress by the PKM2/PKM1 ratio during oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion AC16 and HCM-a cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 475, S0006291X16307148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chaneton B., Hillmann P., Zheng L., Martin A.C.L., Moddocks O.D.K. et al. (2012) Serine is a natural ligand and allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase M2. Nature 491, 458–462 10.1038/nature11540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mcdonnell S.R.P., Hwang S.R. and Rolland D. (2013) Integrated phosphoproteomic and metabolomic profiling reveals NPM-ALK-mediated phosphorylation of PKM2 and metabolic reprogramming in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Blood 122, 958–968 10.1182/blood-2013-01-482026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hasan D., Yang Y., Wang H. et al. (2018) Pyruvate kinase M2 promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma invasion and metastasis through phosphorylation and stabilization of PAK2 protein. Oncogene 37, 1730–1742 10.1038/s41388-017-0086-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yu Z., Huang L., Qiao P. et al. (2016) PKM2 Thr454 phosphorylation increases its nuclear translocation and promotes xenograft tumor growth in A549 human lung cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 47, 953–958 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen Z., Wang Z. and Guo W. (2015) TRIM35 Interacts with pyruvate kinase isoform M2 to suppress the Warburg effect and tumorigenicity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 34, 3946–3956 10.1038/onc.2014.325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang X. and Qian K. (2017) Protein O-GlcNAcylation: emerging mechanisms and functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 452–465 10.1038/nrm.2017.22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yi W., Clark P.M. and Mason D.E. (2012) Phosphofructokinase 1 glycosylation regulates cell growth and metabolism. Science. 337, 975–980 10.1126/science.1222278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Singh J.P., Qian K., Lee J.S. et al. (2019) O-GlcNAcase targets pyruvate kinase M2 to regulate tumor growth. Oncogene. 9, 10.1038/s41388-019-0975-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Y., Liu J. and Jin X. (2017) O-GlcNAcylation destabilizes the active tetrameric PKM2 to promote the Warburg effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 13732. 10.1073/pnas.1704145115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li J., Li S., Guo J. et al. (2018) Natural product micheliolide (MCL) irreversibly activates pyruvate kinase M2 and suppresses leukemia. J. Med. Chem. 61, 4155–4164 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Qi H., Ning X., Yu C. et al. (2019) Succinylation-dependent mitochondrial translocation of PKM2 promotes cell survival in response to nutritional stress. Cell Death Dis. 10, 170. 10.1038/s41419-018-1271-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu F., Ma F., Wang Y. et al. (2017) PKM2 methylation by CARM1 activates aerobic glycolysis to promote tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, ncb3630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang H., Zhu R. and Zhao X. (2019) Sirtuin-mediated deacetylation of hnRNP A1 suppresses glycolysis and growth in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 38, 4915–4931 10.1038/s41388-019-0764-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xiangyun Y., Xiaomin N., Linping G. et al. (2016) Desuccinylation of pyruvate kinase M2 by SIRT5 contributes to antioxidant response and tumor growth. Oncotarget. 8, 6984–6993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang W., Xia Y. and Ji H. (2011) Nuclear PKM2 regulates β-catenin transactivation upon EGFR activation. Nature 480, 118–122 10.1038/nature10598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ma R., Liu Q. and Zheng S. (2019) PKM2-regulated STAT3 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression via TGF-β1-induced EMT. J. Cell. Biochem. 10.1002/jcb.28434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gao X., Wang H. and Yang J.J. (2012) Pyruvate kinase M2 regulates gene transcription by acting as a protein kinase. Mol. Cell 45, 598–609 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dey P., Kundu A. and Sachan R. (2019) PKM2 knockdown induces autophagic cell death via AKT/mTOR pathway in human prostate cancer cells. Cell. physiol. Biochem. 52, 1535–1552 10.33594/000000107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Su Q., Tao T., Tang L. et al. (2018) Down-regulation of PKM2 enhances anticancer efficiency of THP on bladder cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 22, 2774–2790 10.1111/jcmm.13571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tao T., Su Q., Xu S. et al. (2019) Down‐regulation of PKM2 decreases FASN expression in bladder cancer cells through AKT/mTOR/SREBP‐1c axis. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 3088–3104 10.1002/jcp.27129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Luo W. and Semenza G.L. (2012) Emerging roles of PKM2 in cell metabolism and cancer progression. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 23, 560–566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gwangwa M.V., Joubert A.M. and Visagie M.H. (2018) Crosstalk between the Warburg effect, redox regulation and autophagy induction in tumourigenesis. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 23, 20. 10.1186/s11658-018-0088-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mercer T.R., Dinger M.E. and Mattick J.S. (2009) Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 155–159 10.1038/nrg2521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Elling R., Chan J. and Fitzgerald K.A. (2016) Emerging role of long noncoding RNAs as regulators of innate immune cell development and inflammatory gene expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 504–512 10.1002/eji.201444558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wojciech S.M. and Izabela M. (2016) lncRNA-RNA interactions across the human transcriptome:. PLoS ONE 11, e0150353. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huarte M. and Rinn J.L. (2010) Large non-coding RNAs: missing links in cancer? Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, R152–R161 10.1093/hmg/ddq353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chan B., Manley J. and Lee J. (2015) The emerging roles of microRNAs in cancer metabolism. Cancer Lett. 356, 301–308 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhao X.Y. and Lin J.D. (2015) Long noncoding RNAs: a new regulatory code in metabolic control. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 586–596 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cheng Y. (2019) FEZF1-AS1 is a key regulator of cell cycle, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and Wnt/β-catenin signaling in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Biosci. Rep. 39, 10.1042/BSR20180906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 48.Ellis B.C., Graham L.D. and Molloy P.L. (2014) CRNDE, a long non-coding RNA responsive to insulin/IGF signaling, regulates genes involved in central metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1843, 372–386 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cui M., Xiao Z. and Wang Y. (2015) Long noncoding RNA HULC modulates abnormal lipid metabolism in hepatoma cells through an miR-9-mediated RXRA signaling pathway. Cancer Res. 75, 846–857 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li J. (1997) PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science. 275, 1943–1947 10.1126/science.275.5308.1943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang K., Zhang H., Jiang H. (2018) Down-regulation of miR-214 inhibits proliferation and glycolysis in non-small-cell lung cancer cells via down-regulating the expression of hexokinase 2 and pyruvate kinase isozyme M2. Biomed Pharmacother. 105, 545–552 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xiaoru X., Mengying W. and Qiuyu M. (2018) Long noncoding RNA HULC accelerates liver cancer by inhibiting PTEN via autophagy cooperation to miR15a. Mol. Cancer. 17, 94. 10.1186/s12943-018-0843-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bossi L. and Figueroa-Bossi N. (2016) Competing endogenous RNAs: a target-centric view of small RNA regulation in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 775–784 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang J., Liu X. and Wu H. (2010) CREB up-regulates long non-coding RNA, HULC expression through interaction with microRNA-372 in liver cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 5366–5383 10.1093/nar/gkq285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhuojia L., Yanan L. and Qiuyu M. (2018) miR372 promotes progression of liver cancer cells by upregulating erbB-2 through enhancement of YB-1. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 11, 494–507 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huarte M., Guttman M. and Feldser D. (2010) A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell 142, 409–419 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yongyi Y., Xiaozheng H. and Fengfei L. (2018) A lincRNA-p21/miR-181 family feedback loop regulates microglial activation during systemic LPS- and MPTP- induced neuroinflammation. Cell Death Dis. 9, 803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hu W., Wang Z. and Li Q. (2019) Upregulation of lincRNA-p21 in thoracic aortic aneurysms is involved in the regulation of proliferation and apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells by activating TGF-β1 signaling pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 120, 4113–4120 10.1002/jcb.27696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang X., Xu Y. and Wang X. (2017) LincRNA‐p21 suppresses development of human prostate cancer through inhibition of PKM2. Cell Prolif. 50, 1–10 10.1111/cpr.12395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Massari F., Ciccarese C., Santoni M. et al. (2016) Metabolic Phenotype of Bladder Cancer[J]. Cancer Treatment Reviews 45, 46–57 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.03.00526975021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Talesa V.N., Ferri I. and Bellezza G. (2017) Glyoxalase 2 is involved in human prostate cancer progression as part of a mechanism driven by PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling with involvement of PKM2 and ERα. Prostate 77, 196–210 10.1002/pros.23261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sun Q., Chen X. and Ma J. (2011) Mammalian target of rapamycin up-regulation of pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 is critical for aerobic glycolysis and tumor growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 4129–4134 10.1073/pnas.1014769108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cheng K.Y. and Hao M. (2017) Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) regulates transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition via decreased pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) expression in cervical cancer cells. Med. Sci. Monit. 23, 2017–2028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yang F., Zhang H. and Mei Y. (2014) Reciprocal regulation of HIF-1α and LincRNA-p21 modulates the Warburg effect. Mol. Cell 53, 88–100 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang X., Xu Y. and Wang X. (2017) LincRNA-21 suppresses development of human prostate cancer through inhibition of PKM2. Cell Prolif. 50, 1–10 10.1111/cpr.12395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Stone O.A., El-Brolosy M. and Wilhelm K. (2018) Loss of pyruvate kinase M2 limits growth and triggers innate immune signaling in endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 4077. 10.1038/s41467-018-06406-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kim B., Jang C., Dharaneeswaran H. et al. (2018) Endothelial pyruvate kinase M2 maintains vascular integrity. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 4543–4556 10.1172/JCI120912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yan M.D., Lin H.Y. and Hwang P.A. (2019) The anti-tumor activity of brown seaweed oligo-fucoidan via lncRNA expression modulation in HepG2 cells. Cytotechnology. 71, 363–374 10.1007/s10616-019-00293-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Manji S.M., Sørensen B.S. and Klockars T. (2006) Molecular characterization and expression of maternally expressed gene 3 (Meg3/Gtl2) RNA in the mouse inner ear. J. Neurosci. Res. 83, 181–190 10.1002/jnr.20721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhang Y.Y. and Feng H.M. (2017) MEG3 suppresses human pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cells growth and metastasis by down-regulation of miR-183. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 44, 345–356 10.1159/000484906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhuang W., Ge X. and Yang S. (2015) Upregulation of lncRNA MEG3 promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from multiple myeloma patients by targeting BMP4 transcription. Stem Cells 33, 1985–1997 10.1002/stem.1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wu M., An J. and Zheng Q. (2016) Double mutant P53 (N340Q/L344R) promotes hepatocarcinogenesis through upregulation of Pim1 mediated by PKM2 and LncRNA CUDR. Oncotarget 7, 66525–66539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mondal T., Subhash S. and Vaid R. (2015) MEG3 long noncoding RNA regulates the TGF-β pathway genes through formation of RNA-DNA triplex structures. Nat. Commun. 6, 7743. 10.1038/ncomms8743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Siegel P.M. and Massagué J. (2003) Cytostatic and apoptotic actions of TGF-β in homeostasis and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 807–821 10.1038/nrc1208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen Y.L., Song J.J. and Chen X.C. (2015) Mechanisms of pyruvate kinase M2 isoform inhibits cell motility in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 21, 9093. 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Dong G., Mao Q. and Xia W. (2016) PKM2 and cancer: the function of PKM2 beyond glycolysis (Review). Oncol. Lett. 11, 1980–1986 10.3892/ol.2016.4168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Liang J., Cao R. and Zhang Y. (2016) PKM2 dephosphorylation by Cdc25A promotes the Warburg effect and tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 7, 12431. 10.1038/ncomms12431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Pan C., Wang X. and Shi K. (2016) MiR-122 reverses the doxorubicin-resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through regulating the tumor metabolism. PLoS ONE 11, e0152090. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zheng Q., Lin Z. and Xu J. (2018) Long noncoding RNA MEG3 suppresses liver cancer cells growth through inhibiting β-catenin by activating PKM2 and inactivating PTEN. Cell Death Dis. 9, 253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Loewer S., Cabili M.N. and Guttman M. (2010) Large intergenic non-coding RNA-RoR modulates reprogramming of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Genet. 42, 1113–1117 10.1038/ng.710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hwang W.Y., Fu Y. and Reyon D. (2013) Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 227–229 10.1038/nbt.2501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Peng W.X., Huang J.G. and Yang L. (2017) Linc-RoR promotes MAPK/ERK signaling and confers estrogen-independent growth of breast cancer. Mol. Cancer 16, 161. 10.1186/s12943-017-0727-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Eades G., Wolfson B., Zhang Y. et al. (2015) lincRNA-RoR and miR-145 regulate invasion in triple-negative breast cancer via targeting ARF6. Mol. Cancer Res. Mcr 13, 330–338 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Li C., Zhao Z. and Zhou Z. (2016) Linc-ROR confers gemcitabine resistance to pancreatic cancer cells via inducing autophagy and modulating the miR-124/PTBP1/PKM2 axis. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 78, 1199–1207 10.1007/s00280-016-3178-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Takahashi K., Yan I.K. and Haga H. (2014) Modulation of hypoxia-signaling pathways by extracellular linc-RoR. J. Cell Sci. 127, 1585–1594 10.1242/jcs.141069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chen Y., Shen Z. and Zhi Y. (2018) Long non-coding RNA ROR promotes radioresistance in hepatocelluar carcinoma cells by acting as a ceRNA for microRNA-145 to regulate RAD18 expression. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 05, 117–125 10.1111/cpr.12395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Luo W., Hu H. and Chang R. (2011) Pyruvate kinase M2 is a PHD3-stimulated coactivator for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Cell. 145, 732–744 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Qi L., Xue L. and Yu Y. (2014) Insulin regulates glucose consumption and lactate production through reactive oxygen species and pyruvate kinase M2. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 1–10 10.1155/2014/315896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Quan L.J. and Wang W.J. (2019) FEZF1-AS1 functions as an oncogenic lncRNA in retinoblastoma. Biosci. Rep. 39, 1–8 10.1042/BSR20190754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Song I.S., Ha G.H. and Kim J.M. (2011) Human ZNF312b oncogene is regulated by Sp1 binding to its promoter region through DNA demethylation and histone acetylation in gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer 129, 2124–2133 10.1002/ijc.25871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang Y.-D., Sun X.-J. and Yin J.-J. (2018) Long non-coding RNA FEZF1-AS1 promotes cell invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition through JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 106, 134–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ye H., Zhou Q. and Zheng S. (2018) FEZF1-AS1/miR-107/ZNF312B axis facilitates progression and Warburg effect in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 9, 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zehua B., Jiwei Z. and Min L. (2018) LncRNA-FEZF1-AS1 promotes tumor proliferation and metastasis in colorectal cancer by regulating PKM2 signaling. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 4808–4819 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wojnarowicz P.M., Breznan A. and Arcand S.L. (2008) Construction of a chromosome 17 transcriptome in serous ovarian cancer identifies differentially expressed genes. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 18, 963–975 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01134.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Fang M., Ou J. and Hutchinson L. (2014) The BRAF oncoprotein functions through the transcriptional repressor MAFG to mediate the CpG Island Methylator phenotype. Mol. Cell 55, 904–915 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Cui S., Yang X. and Zhang L. (2018) LncRNA MAFG-AS1 promotes the progression of colorectal cancer by sponging miR-147b and activation of NDUFA4. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 506, 251–258 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.10.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Diaz-Lagares A., Crujeiras A.B. and Lopez-Serra P. (2016) Epigenetic inactivation of the p53-induced long noncoding RNA TP53 target 1 in human cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E7535–E7544 10.1073/pnas.1608585113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Chen X., Gao Y. and Li D. (2017) LncRNA-TP53TG1 participated in the stress response under glucose deprivation in glioma. J. Cell. Biochem. 118, 4897–4904 10.1002/jcb.26175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Huang J.Z., Chen M. and Chen D. (2017) A peptide encoded by a putative lncRNA HOXB-AS3 suppresses colon cancer growth. Mol. Cell 68, 171–184 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zheng Y.L., Li L. and Jia Y.X. (2019) LINC01554-mediated glucose metabolism reprogramming suppresses tumorigenicity in hepatocellular carcinoma via downregulating PKM2 expression and inhibiting Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Theranostics 9, 796–810 10.7150/thno.28992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ryaboshapkina M. and Hammar M. (2017) Human hepatic gene expression signature of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progression, a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 12361. 10.1038/s41598-017-10930-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wu Y., Wang W. and Jiang W. (2017) An investigation of obesity susceptibility genes in Northern Han Chinese by targeted resequencing. Medicine 96, e6117. 10.1097/MD.0000000000006117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Liu X., Zhu Q., Guo Y. et al. (2019) LncRNA LINC00689 promotes the growth, metastasis and glycolysis of glioma cells by targeting miR-338-3p/PKM2 axis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 117, 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Mattick J.S. (2004) RNA regulation: a new genetics? Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 316–323 10.1038/nrg1321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Dombrauckas J.D., Santarsiero B.D. and Mesecar A.D. (2005) Structural basis for tumor pyruvate kinase M2 allosteric regulation and catalysis. Biochemistry 44, 9417. 10.1021/bi0474923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281–297 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Thomson D.W. and Dinger M.E. (2016) Endogenous microRNA sponges: evidence and controversy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 272–283 10.1038/nrg.2016.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Hillis A.L., Lau A.N., Devoe C.X. et al. (2018) PKM2 is not required for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Metab. 6, 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Cortes-Cros M., Hemmerlin C., Ferretti S. et al. (2012) M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase is dispensable for tumor maintenance and growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 489–494 10.1073/pnas.1212780110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Hosios A.M., Fiske B.P., Gui D.Y. and Vander Heiden M.G. (2015) Lack of evidence for PKM2 protein kinase activity. Mol. Cell 59, 850–857 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Tech K., Tikunov A.P., Farooq H. et al. (2017) Pyruvate kinase inhibits proliferation during postnatal cerebellar neurogenesis and suppresses medulloblastoma formation. Cancer Res. 77, 3217–3230 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang Y.-H., Israelsen W.J., Lee D., Yu V.W.C., Jeanson N.T., Clish C.B. et al. (2014) Cellstate-specific metabolic dependency in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Cell 158, 1309–1323 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Lau A.N., Israelsen W.J., Roper J. et al. (2017) PKM2 is not required for colon cancer initiated by APC loss. Cancer Metab. 5, e7. 10.1186/s40170-017-0172-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Morita M., Sato T., Nomura M. et al. (2018) PKM1 confers metabolic advantages and promotes cell-autonomous tumor cell growth. Cancer Cell. 33, 355–357 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



