Editor
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with a significant disease burden. Whilst numerous treatments exist, development of effective and affordable therapies offering good patient outcomes remains desirable.
A mixture of fumaric acid esters (FAE) is commonly prescribed for oral treatment of moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis in Germany. In other European countries (UK, Ireland, Italy and the Netherlands, among others), FAE have been imported or compounded by local pharmacies. Current international guidelines recommend FAE for the short‐ and long‐term management of psoriasis.1 Although the original formulation (Fumaderm®) contains a mixture of FAE, the main active ingredient is dimethylfumarate (DMF), an anti‐inflammatory and immune‐modulating agent with proven efficacy in psoriasis.2 The monoethylfumarate salts within the FAE formulation have shown much lower biological activity both in vitro and in vivo.3, 4, 5
Dimethylfumarate (Skilarence®) was approved for use as monotherapy for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in June 2017. Its pivotal study was a phase III, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, non‐inferiority trial (BRIDGE, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01726933), comparing the efficacy and safety of DMF versus the FAE mixture in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.6 At week 16, DMF was superior to placebo (P < 0.001) and non‐inferior to the FAE mixture (P < 0.001) in achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75, and superior to placebo in the percentage of patients who achieved ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’ in the Physician's Global Assessment (P < 0.001). DMF also showed comparable results to the FAE mixture in quality of life improvement. Importantly, at a comparable dose, the safety profile of DMF was like that of the FAE mixture.6
So far, FAE have demonstrated a favourable long‐term safety profile and good drug survival over time, alongside good levels of patient acceptability and satisfaction with treatment. Considering all preclinical and clinical evidence, it is reasonable to conceive that single‐compound therapy with DMF will achieve comparable efficacy results, and at least similar tolerability, in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who undergo a straightforward 1 : 1 switch in terms of dosing.
In this context, phasing out of previous FAE treatment is not required, and treatment response will not be affected by the timing of the switch. This assumption is largely because DMF, the active ingredient in both formulations, is administered at identical doses in each tablet (30 or 120 mg). Benefits of switching include treatment with a therapy that is now licensed across Europe and requires less frequent monitoring (quarterly, rather than monthly) in patients with lymphocyte counts >1000/mL.7, 8 Whilst monitoring after DMF administration is still recommended, as for all other anti‐psoriatic therapies, less frequent monitoring remains clinically meaningful as it reduces treatment burden for both patients and physicians, whilst still ensuring an appropriate safety margin.
Switching from the FAE mixture to DMF is common in clinical practice. For example, in the Netherlands, both the FAE mixture and DMF have been available alongside each other for some time and switching from the FAE mixture to DMF is feasible without loss of efficacy or side‐effects. In addition, recently published results from a German prospective study in 40 patients who switched from the FAE mixture to an equivalent dose of DMF confirmed that a direct treatment switch is possible. Moreover, this study demonstrated that a direct switch offered the same clinical relief and did not require a washout period between therapies.9 In summary, as clinical experience of switching grows, evidence indicates that switching to DMF is both feasible and effective.
Medical writing assistance was provided by Sandra Cuscó PhD of Bioscript Group, Macclesfield, UK and funded by Almirall S.A.
The copyright line for this article was changed on 11 October 2019 after original online publication
References
- 1. Nast A, Amelunxen L, Augustin M et al S3 Guideline for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, update – short version part 1 – systemic treatment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2018; 16: 645–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Mrowietz U, Morrison PJ, Suhrkamp I, Kumanova M, Clement B. The pharmacokinetics of fumaric acid esters reveal their in vivo effects. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2018; 39: 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Brennan MS, Matos MF, Li B et al Dimethyl fumarate and monoethyl fumarate exhibit differential effects on KEAP1, NRF2 activation, and glutathione depletion in vitro. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0120254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gillard GO, Collette B, Anderson J et al DMF, but not other fumarates, inhibits NF‐kappaB activity in vitro in an Nrf2‐independent manner. J Neuroimmunol 2015; 283: 74–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Landeck L, Asadullah K, Amasuno A, Pau‐Charles I, Mrowietz U. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs. monoethyl fumarate (MEF) salts for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a review of clinical data. Arch Dermatol Res 2018; 310: 475–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mrowietz U, Szepietowski JC, Loewe R et al Efficacy and safety of LAS41008 (dimethyl fumarate) in adults with moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a randomized, double‐blind, Fumaderm(R) – and placebo‐controlled trial (BRIDGE). Br J Dermatol 2017; 176: 615–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Almirall S.A . Skilarence. Summary of product characteristics. 2017.
- 8. Biogen Idec GmbH . Fumaderm. Summary of product characteristics. Last updated July 2015.
- 9. Falkvoll S, Gerdes S, Mrowietz U. Switch of psoriasis therapy from a fumaric acid ester mixture to dimethyl fumarate monotherapy: results of a prospective study. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2019. [in press] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]