Skip to main content
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
. 2019 Oct 23;2019:9158942. doi: 10.1155/2019/9158942

Chemical Fingerprint and Metabolic Profile Analysis of Tianshu Tablets by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

Lin Chen 1, Renhao Chen 1, Hui Ouyang 2, Qi Wang 1, Zhifeng Li 1,, Yulin Feng 2,, Shilin Yang 2
PMCID: PMC6854980  PMID: 31772816

Abstract

In recent years, the chemical fingerprinting of traditional Chinese medicines and the metabolites in these compounds has been a hot topic. In the present study, the chemical fingerprint of Tianshu tablets (TST) and the metabolic characteristics of compounds in rats after intragastric administration were studied by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF MS). In a preliminary study, 77 chemical components in TST were determined by comparison with retention times, accurate molecular mass, and characteristic fragment ions of the known compounds in the literature and some well-known compounds were analyzed in detail, and the fragmentation pathways for parishins B, gastrodin A, and cnidilide or neocnilide were specifically analyzed. After intragastric administration of TST (4 g/kg) to rats, a total of 61 compounds were detected in plasma samples, including 7 prototypes and 54 metabolites. After further analysis, it was found that these metabolites were subjected to glucuronidation, sulfation, methylation, hydroxylation, dehydrogenation, or mixed metabolic processes. Hydroxylation and glucuronidation were finally confirmed as the main metabolic pathways. This is the first research on the chemical fingerprint and metabolites of TST, which lays a foundation for further investigation of TST.

1. Introduction

In recent years, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has attracted increasing attention worldwide by virtue of its applications. Da Chuanxiong Formula (DCXF) is a well-known and extensively used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) decoction for the treatment of migraine caused by blood stasis and wind-heat syndrome. It is composed of two herbs, namely, Chuanxiong (Chuanxiong rhizoma) and Tianma (Gastrodiae rhizoma), with a crude weight ratio of 4 : 1. Tianshu tablets (TST) are a representative DCXF preparation that is widely used in clinics for treating the blood stasis type of headache and migraine [13].

Phytochemical and pharmacological investigations of DXCF have shown that phenols, organic acids, phthalides, and nitrogen-containing compounds are the major active ingredients [4]. At present, several qualitative studies on the main components of DCXF have been performed [58]. One study used LC-Q-TOF/MS to identify 17 different components in a 50% ethanol extract of DCXF [5]. In one study, three compounds of Chuanxiong and eight components of Tianma were identified by HPLC-DAD-MSn [6]. Two continuous studies showed that 10 different compounds were detected in rat plasma after intragastric administration of DCXF active components, including 6 compounds from Chuanxiong and 4 compounds from Tianma [7, 8]. These four studies were based on samples of a 50% ethanol extract from a 4 : 1 mixture of the two herbs or active ingredients from a single crude herb. In one study, 38 components were identified or preliminarily identified from a Tianshu capsule by means of HPLC, LC-DAD-MSN, and LC-DAD-ESI IT-TOF/MS analysis, although Tianshu tablets and Tianshu capsules are two different dosage forms [9]. This research is still very important because of its different applicability. This study enriches our understanding of the components of DCXF and studies the metabolites of TST for the first time.

In our study, 77 chemical components of TST were preliminarily determined by a comparison with retention time, accurate molecular mass, and characteristic fragment ions of known compounds in the literature. Furthermore, UPLC/Q-TOF MS was used to analyze the plasma of rats after oral administration of TST. A total of 61 compounds were identified or preliminarily identified, including 7 prototypes and 54 metabolites.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Some reference standards (pyroglutamic acid, 5-(hydroxymethyl)furoic acid, and parishin B) for Gastrodia rhizoma were isolated and purified in our laboratory, and other standards (uridine, gastrodin A, and neocnilide) were purchased from the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (Beijing, China). Purities of the standards were above 98% by HPLC analysis. HPLC-grade acetonitrile, methanol, and formic acid were purchased from Fisher Scientific (MA, USA). Deionized water was prepared by a Milli-Q Water purification system (Millipore, MA, USA). High-purity nitrogen (99.99%) and helium (99.999%) were purchased from Gas Supplies Center of Peking University Health Science Center (Beijing, China).

Gastrodia rhizoma and Chuanxiong rhizoma were purchased from Tian Heng pharmacy (Beijing, China). All herbal materials were authenticated by Professor Bei Wu (Nanchang Institute for Food and Drug Control). TianShu tablets were prepared according to Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2015 Edition [1].

2.2. Animals and Drug

Sprague–Dawley rats (male, 12–14 weeks; 200–240 g) were provided by Hunan SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. Protocols for all animal experiments were approved. Animals were kept in a controlled environment for 3 days and fasted for 12 h before experiments. TST were dissolved in a 9 g/L NaCl solution (NS) (250 mg/ml) and administered by oral gavage at a dose of 1000 mg/kg (equivalent to 4 g of crude drug per kg) body weight.

2.3. Sample Collection and Pretreatment

After oral administration of TST, blood samples were collected at 30, 60, and 120 min (n = 5) in an Eppendorf tube with heparin sodium and then centrifuged (16000 rpm) at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was then separated, and all samples were stored at −80°C immediately until analysis. The protocol for sample preparation is described below: 1 mL plasma was mixed with 5 mL methanol, vortexed for 5 min, and centrifuged at 16000 rpm at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatant was dried with nitrogen gas at 4°C, and 400 μl of 50% methanol was added to reconstitute the residue, which was then centrifuged at 16000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a vial, and 10 μl was injected for LC-MS analysis. All samples were filtered through a membrane (0.22 μm pore size). At the same time, in order to eliminate the influence of matrix, blank plasma was added to participate in the analysis.

2.4. UPLC/QTOF-MS Conditions

UPLC/QTOF-MS analysis was performed on a Shimadzu LC-30 AD system (Kyoto, Japan) coupled with an AB SCIEX Triple-TOF 5600 mass spectrometer (Foster City, CA, USA). All samples were separated on an Acquity UPLC C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, USA) with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of aqueous 0.1% formic acid (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B). The gradient elution program for TST was set at 0–3.0 min, 5–8% B; 3.0–10.0 min, 8–15% B; 10.0–18 min, 15–20% B; 18–22 min, 20–35% B; 22–37 min, 35–45% B; 37–43 min, 45–95% B; and 43–48 min, 95–95% B. The gradient elution program for the plasma samples was set at 0–2.0 min, 5% B; 2.0–25.0 min, 5–95% B; and 25.0–30.0 min, 95–95%. The equilibration time was 5 min. The conditions for the ion source were as follows: compounds in TST were measured using the total ion chromatograms in negative and positive ion ESI-MS mode in the mass range m/z 50–1250, but plasma samples were analyzed only in positive ion ESI-MS mode. The other operating parameters were optimized as follows: source temperature, 500°C; ion spray voltage, 4500 V; gas 1, 50 psi; gas 2, 50 psi; curtain gas, 45 psi; decluttering potential, 100 V; and collision energy was set to 40 (15) eV.

2.5. Data Process

TST compounds from the extracts and metabolites data were acquired by full scan, which rely on dynamic background subtraction (DBS) and multiple mass defect filtering (MMDF) and includes some compounds with very low concentrations (MDF window was set to ±50 mDa around the mass defects of the templates and over a mass range of ±50 Da around the filter template masses).

Analysis of data on TST compounds in extracts and metabolites was performed using a variety of data mining tools, including extract ion chromatograms (XIC) of PeakView®1.6 (AB SCIEX, CA, USA), MMDF, and NLF&DPLs of Metabolitepilot™ 1.5 (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA). All compounds were analyzed after removal of the matrix effects.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization of LC/MS Conditions

In order to obtain the best analytical data, our analysis builds upon another recent study [10]. The separation conditions, supplements, and chromatographic columns were optimized at the beginning of the experiment. Firstly, in order to obtain sharp peaks and reduce the pressure on the UPLC column, methanol was used as the mobile phase instead of acetonitrile. At the same time, 0.1% formic acid was added to improve peak shape and ionization of the analytes. The gradient was improved, and it was shown that the compounds in TST could be separated within 48 minutes, while plasma samples could be separated within 30 minutes (the specific methods can be found in Section 2.4). In addition, in order to obtain the most abundant mass spectrometry information, the collision energy was optimized. The results showed that when the collision energy rose to 40 eV, the main fragments were seen, but when the energy reached 55 eV, the second order fragments were too fragmented to be easily analyzed. Therefore, a collision energy of 40 eV was selected. As for UPLC/Q-TOF MS, mass spectra were recorded in both positive and negative detection modes.

3.2. UPLC/Q-TOF MS Analysis of TST Extracts

To characterize the chemical constituents of TST, a fast, efficient, and reliable UPLC/Q-TOF MS method was established. By virtue of the high resolution and speed of UPLC and the accurate mass measurement of the TOF MS, a total of 77 compounds were identified. The mass spectra of these components were examined in negative ion mode and positive ion mode. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of TST in positive and negative ion modes are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Details of the identified components are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

MS total ion chromatogram (TIC) of TST fraction by UPLC/Q-TOF MS in negative ion mode.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MS total ion chromatogram (TIC) of TST fraction by UPLC/Q-TOF MS in positive ion mode.

Table 1.

The chemical constituents detected from TST.

Peak RT (min) Formula Error (ppm) [M−H] (m/z) Intensity Product ions Identification Structure class Ref.
Calculated Measure
X1a 0.98 C7H12O6 −1.2 191.0561 191.0559 86129 154.9973, 127.0393, 111.0091, 93.0355, 85.0302, 73.0302 Quinic acid Organic acids [10]
X2 1.07 C6H8O7 0.9 191.0197 191.0199 421357 111.0096, 87.0103 Citric acid Organic acids [10]
X3b 1.07 C9H12N2O6 −1 243.0623 243.0620 5161 nd Uridine Nitrogen-containing compounds
X4b 1.08 C5H7NO3 3 128.0353 128.0357 24352 nd Pyroglutamic acid Organic acids
X5b 1.36 C6H6O4 1.1 141.0193 141.0195 3248 nd 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furoic acid Organic acids [11]
X6 1.36 C10H13N5O5 2.4 282.0844 282.0851 1153 150.0412, 133.0158, 108.0286 Guanosine Nitrogen-containing compounds
X7 1.63 C13H18O7 −1.1 285.0980 285.0977 1505 223.0248, 123.0432, 105.0348 Gastrodin Glycosides [12]
X8 2.03 C7H6O4 0.7 153.0193 153.0195 16114 109.0300, 91.0193, 65.0057 Protocatechuic acid Organic acids [13]
X9 4.02 C7H6O3 2.5 137.0244 137.0248 31464 119.0140, 108.0215, 93.0350, 81.0366, 65.0414 3,4-Dihydroxy benzaldehyde Phenols [14]
X10 4.70 C19H24O13 1.7 459.1144 459.1152 283440 423.0939, 397.1138, 173.0088, 61.0444, 129.0184, 111.0088 Parishin E or G Glycosides [12]
X11 5.09 C16H18O9 0.8 353.0878 353.0881 109164 191.0559, 173.0444, 161.0236, 134.0387, 111.0458, 93.0350, 85.0301 4-Caffeoylquinic acid Organic acids [15]
X12 5.13 C17H23N3O7S 0.5 412.1184 412.1186 11210 306.0753, 272.0898, 179.0459, 160.0077, 143.0461, 128.0348, 99.0559 S-(4-Hydroxybenzyl)-glutathione Nitrogen-containing compounds [12]
X13 5.24 C23H33N3O12S 2.3 574.1712 574.1726 7677 484.1388, 378.0974, 306.0756, 272.0874, 210.0864, 143.0464 S-(4-Hydroxybenzyl)-glutathione glucoside Nitrogen-containing compounds
X14 5.34 C9H10O4 −0.2 181.0506 181.0506 2573 136.9210, 121.0296, 109.0279 4-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)benzoic acid Organic acids
X15 5.58 C7H6O2 4.3 121.0295 121.0302 50808 92.0266, 77.0403 p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde Phenols [14]
X16 5.64 C9H8O4 0.9 179.0350 179.0352 80360 134.0371, 108.0214, 93.0345, 89.0401, 79.0555 Caffeic acid Organic acids [13]
X17 5.99 C8H8O4 3 167.0350 167.0355 275549 123.0454, 79.0570 Vanillic acid Organic acids [12]
X18b 7.31 C19H28O12 0.4 447.1508 447.1510 14270 269.1028, 233.0656, 161.0449, 101.0242, 71.0153 Gastrodin A Glycosides [12]
X19 7.68 C17H19N5O5 −1.6 372.1313 372.1307 2202 336.1054, 266.0867, 134.0467 p-Hydroxybenzyl adenosine Nitrogen-containing compounds
X20 7.73 C8H8O3 0.5 151.0401 151.0402 7660 136.0155, 108.0219, 92.0273 Vanilline Phenols
X21 8.62 C17H20O9 −0.7 367.1035 367.1032 21071 193.0496, 191.0553, 173.0455, 134.0369, 111.0463, 93.0349, 85.0299 3-Feruloylquinic acid Organic acids [16]
X22 8.94 C9H10O3 −0.8 165.0557 165.0556 2085 119.0515, 103.0604 L-(-)-Phenyllactic acid Organic acids
X23b 9.11 C32H40O19 4.9 727.2091 727.2151 122722 459.1156, 441.1045, 423.0937, 397.1142, 369.1188, 217.0496 Parishin B Glycosides [13]
X24 9.78 C33H42O20 4 757.2197 757.2227 659 503.1631, 453.0961, 161.0480 Parishin H or M Glycosides [12]
X25 10.00 C10H10O4 0.7 193.0506 193.0508 97733 178.0265, 149.0591, 134.0372 Ferulic acid Organic acids [13]
X26 10.02 C21H28O13 0 487.1457 487.1457 4684 441.0958, 423.0934, 397.1169, 161.0430, 111.0091 Parishin O or N Glycosides [12]
X27 10.05 C32H40O19 4.9 727.2091 727.2127 122722 459.1156, 441.1045, 423.0937, 397.1142, 369.1188, 161.0453 Parishin C Glycosides [12]
X28 10.71 C14H14O3S −2.2 261.0591 261.0585 777 205.8269, 167.8694, 137.0057 4,4′-Dihydroxybenzyl sulfoxide Phenols [14]
X29 11.74 C11H12O5 −2.2 223.0612 223.0607 2431 108.0226, 179.0713 Sinapic acid Organic acids [13]
X30 12.20 C7H6O3 2.5 137.0244 137.0248 31464 108.0215, 93.0352, 65.0410 p-Hydroxybenzoic acid Phenols [14]
X31 13.21 C45H56O25 4.7 995.3038 995.3107 39727 727.2129, 441.1065, 423.0915, 397.1119, 161.0457 Parishin Glycosides [12]
X32 13.56 C20H24O8 0.2 391.1398 391.1399 6858 229.0860, 123.0452, 121.0288, 107.0511, 93.0357, 71.0265 Bis-(4-hydroxybenzyl)-ether-mono-β-D-glucopyranoside Glycosides [14]
X33 13.69 C26H30O14 2.9 565.1563 565.1579 811 177.0188, 111.0153 Parishin W Glycosides [12]
X34 14.13 C25H24O12 2.6 515.1195 515.1208 91406 353.0879, 335.0781, 191.0558, 179.0345, 173.0450, 161.0240 3,4-Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer Organic acids [15]
X35 16.48 C25H24O12 2.6 515.1195 515.1208 91406 353.0879, 335.0781, 191.0558, 179.0345, 173.0450, 161.0240 3,4-Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer Organic acids [15]
X36 17.42 C9H12O2 −0.8 151.0765 151.0763 1891 133.0677, 107.0520, 94.0274, 77.0394 4-(Ethoxymethyl)phenol Phenols [14]
X37 23.89 C14H14O2S −4 245.0642 245.0632 2498 139.0217 Bis(4-hydroxybenzyl)sulfide Phenols [14]
X38 32.90 C9H8O3 −1 163.0401 163.0399 4130 145.0279, 135.0455, 119.0493, 91.0184, 77.0443, 65.0039 p-Hydroxycinnamic acid Organic acids
X39 39.73 C16H22O4 −0.2 277.1445 277.1445 5380 233.1544, 206.8262 Dibutyl phthalate Phenols
Peak RT (min) Formula Error (ppm) [M+H]+ (m/z) Intensity Product ions Identification Structure class Ref.
Calculated Measure
Y1a,b 1.05 C5H5N5 −1.8 136.0618 136.0615 46698 nd Adenine Nitrogen-containing compounds
Y2 1.08 C10H13N5O4 1.5 268.1040 268.1044 174357 136.0623, 119.0360, Adenosine Nitrogen-containing compounds
Y3b 1.09 C9H11NO3 −1.9 182.0812 182.0808 34675 nd Tyrosin Nitrogen-containing compounds
Y4 8.60 C24H29N3O8S −0.5 520.1748 520.1746 7896 308.0836, 285.0913, 233.0591, 179.0486, 162.0208, 107.0485 (2)-g-L-[N-(4-Hydroxy benzyl)]glutamyl-L-[s-(4-hydroxybenzyl)] cysteinylglycine Nitrogen-containing compounds
Y5 9.77 C10H8O4 −0.8 193.0495 193.0494 14081 178.0257, 150.0323, 133.0281, 122.0361 3-Carboxyethyl-phthalide Organic acids [16]
Y6 10.55 C12H18O5 −0.1 243.1227 243.1227 13011 165.0909, 151.0381, 137.0949 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6,7-dihydroxy phthalide Organic acids
Y7 10.55 C12H16O4 −0.5 225.1121 225.1119 21174 207.1023, 165.0557, 151.0376, 137.0954 Senkyunolide H or I or ligustilidiol or cis-6,7-dihydroxy-ligustilide Phthalides [9]
Y8 11.94 C12H16O5 −0.8 241.1071 241.1069 1918 150.0677, 107.0497, 71.0498 Senkyunolide R or S Phthalides
Y9 13.27 C12H16O3 0.1 209.1172 209.1172 288915 153.0544, 149.0593, 135.0473, 121.1006, 117.0709 Senkyunolide G or K or Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Phthalides [9]
Y10 13.27 C12H18O4 0.4 227.1278 227.1279 102387 163.1104, 153.0543, 149.0961, 119.0860, 107.0484, 79.054 Senkyunolide J or N or R2 Phthalides [9]
Y11 16.56 C12H14O3 −0.6 207.1016 207.1015 1327567 189.0917, 165.0550, 146.0732, 133.0653, 119.0841, 105.0693 3-Butylidene-6-hydroxy-5,6-dihy-drophthalide or senkyunolide F or chuanxiongol Phthalides [9]
Y12 16.57 C12H16O4 −0.9 225.1121 225.1119 39845 165.0533, 133.0658, 128.0619, 91.0532, 77.0402 Senkyunolide H or I or ligustilidiol or cis-6,7-dihydroxy-ligustilide Phthalides [9]
Y13 17.87 C12H14O4 −0.2 223.0965 223.0966 23855 177.0921, 149.0591, 121.0308, 103.0523, 77.0401 Senkyunolide D or 4,7-dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide Phthalides [9]
Y14 18.08 C12H14O3 −0.1 207.1016 207.1015 425060 189.0901, 165.0558, 161.0948, 128.0620, 105.0701, 91.0549, 77.0393 3-Butylidene-6-hydroxy-5,6-dihy-drophthalide or senkyunolide F or chuanxiongol Phthalides [9]
Y15 19.53 C18H28O8 0.3 373.1857 373.1858 45450 211.1335, 193.1228, 147.1172, 105.0702, 79.0577 Ligusticoside A Glycosides [17]
Y16 21.97 C12H12O2 −0.5 189.0910 189.0910 151946 128.0623, 115.0544, 105.0702, 91.0551, 77.0388 Butylidenephthalide isomer Phthalides [9]
Y17 23.67 C12H14O4 0.3 223.0965 223.0966 43428 177.0899, 167.0387, 149.0227, 121.0278, 91.0541, 77.0382 Senkyunolide D or 4,7-dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide Phthalides [9]
Y18 24.29 C12H12O2 0 189.0910 189.0910 305525 152.0611, 128.0618, 115.0529, 105.0341, 91.0537, 77.0394 Butylidenephthalide isomer Phthalides [9]
Y19 24.50 C12H14O2 −0.9 191.1067 191.1067 340079 117.0688, 91.0560, 77.0396 3-Butylphthalide or Z-ligustilide or E-ligustilide Phthalides [9]
Y20 26.27 C12H15ClO3 −0.5 243.0783 243.0781 21244 207.1020, 189.0907, 161.0364, 133.0640, 119.0840, 91.0533, Senkyunolide L Phthalides [18]
Y21 26.63 C12H12O3 0.6 205.0859 205.0860 90627 187.0745, 168.0574, 144.0573, 131.0493, 115.0541, 103.0552, 91.0533, 77.0401 Senkyunolide B or C Phthalides [9]
Y22 27.74 C13H16O3 −0.6 221.1172 221.1171 4804 175.1090, 105.0691 2-(1-Oxopentyl)-benzoic Organic acids
Y23 27.90 C12H12O3 0.6 205.0859 205.0860 90627 187.0745, 168.0574, 144.0573, 131.0493, 115.0541, 103.0552, 91.0533, 77.0401 Senkyunolide B or C Phthalides [9]
Y24 28.65 C12H16O2 0.7 193.1223 193.1225 2273337 147.1167, 137.0590, 119.0498, 105.0699, 91.0544, 77.0389, 65.0383 Senkyunolide A Phthalides [9]
Y25 29.49 C12H14O2 0.3 191.1067 191.1067 3489472 153.0704, 145.1007, 135.0440, 117.0695, 91.0546, 77.0391 3-Butylphthalide or Z-ligustilide or E-ligustilide Phthalides [9]
Y26 32.06 C12H12O2 −0.5 189.0910 189.0910 39396 152.0611, 128.0615, 115.0545, 91.0554 Butylidenephthalide isomer Phthalides [9]
Y27b 32.89 C12H18O2 −0.8 195.1380 195.1378 686098 177.1344, 149.1309, 79.0550 Cnidilide or neocnilide Phthalides [9]
Y28 33.04 C12H14O2 0.3 191.1067 191.1067 637725 173.0961, 145.1008, 130.0773, 117.0694, 91.0548, 77.0392 3-Butylphthalide or Z-ligustilide or E-ligustilide Phthalides [9]
Y29 33.64 C12H12O2 −0.2 189.0910 189.0910 401466 152.0627, 128.0622, 115.0540, 91.0550 Butylidenephthalide isomer Phthalides [9]
Y30 35.24 C12H20O2 −0.7 197.1536 197.1535 21102 119.0862, 95.0856, 91.0555, 81.0697, 67.0552, 3,7-Dimethyl-3-acetate-1,6-octadiene-3-ol acetate Others
Y31 36.15 C21H32O2 0.9 317.2475 317.2478 12477 281.2253, 211.1524, 187.1501, 159.1179, 149.1329, 145.0997, 117.0717, 81.0720 Pregnenolone Others
Y32 36.37 C24H28O5 0.1 397.2010 397.2010 71592 191.1064, 173.0954, 155.0852, 145.1003, 128.0625, 117.0715, 105.0724, 91.0544 Chuanxiongnolide A or B Others [19]
Y33 38.22 C24H28O5 0.4 397.2010 397.2010 66600 361.1802, 333.1842, 307.1708, 291.1401, 279.1403, 261.1264,2 17.0999, 191.1070, 173.0972, 91.0553 Chuanxiongnolide A or B Others [19]
Y34 39.08 C24H32O5 −0.4 401.2323 401.2321 20533 383.2246, 191.1061, 163.1084, 149.0594, 145.1037, 135.0439 Chuanxiongdiolide R2 or chuanxiongdiolide B Others [20]
Y35 39.48 C17H24O4 0.8 293.1747 293.1750 22471 175.1115, 151.0754, 137.0605, 111.0415, 91.0547, 83.0488 Senkyunolide M or Q Phthalides [9]
Y36 41.42 C24H30O4 −0.1 383.2217 383.2217 1160225 191.1068, 173.0958, 163.1120, 149.0601, 135.0440, 91.0546, 79.0566 Senkyunolide P or 3,8-dihydro-diligustilide or angelicide or Z,Z′−3,3′ −8,8′-diligustilide Phthalides [9]
Y37 41.52 C24H32O4 0.1 385.2373 385.2374 627373 367.2247, 349.2092, 321.2178, 293.1915, 193.1229, 175.1113147.1159, 137.0587, 119.0871, 93.0687 Chuanxiongdiolide A Others [20]
Y38 41.88 C24H28O4 0.1 381.2060 381.2061 4796897 191.1070, 173.0955, 163.1126, 149.0596, 135.0437, 91.0551, 79.0549 Levistolide A or senkyunolide O or tokinolide B or riligustilide Phthalides [9]

a“X” in negative ion mode and “Y” in negative-positive mode. bCompared with reference standards.

Through analysis, it was found that the 77 compounds contained 19 organic acids, 9 nitrogen-containing compounds, 11 glucosides, 8 phenols, 24 phthalides, and 6 other compounds. The numbering information of these compounds is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Information about classification of compounds in TST.

3.2.1. Chemical Fingerprint of TST in Negative Ion Modes

According to the literature, the main components of Tianma are phenols and organic acids [9]. However, there are also glycosides in the components of Tianma [12]. Many characteristic components of Tianma were analyzed and identified in the negative ion mode. Because the structures of organic acids and phenols are relatively simple, the characteristic glycoside compounds X18 and X23 were identified here and the chromatographic and spectral data for compounds X18 and X23 were preliminarily characterized by referring to the literature and reference materials.

Peak X18 gave an [M−H] ion at m/z 447.1508. Peak X18 produced MS2 base peaks at m/z 269.1028 and 161.0449 corresponding to [M-H-179 Da]. This suggests that Peak X18 may contain a glucose group and a fructose group. Therefore, we deduced that the molecular structure likely contains sucrose. According to literature reports [12] and reference standards, we identified Peak X18 as gastrodin A. Peak X23 gave a [M-H] ion at m/z 727.2091 and had characteristic fragment ions at m/z 459.1156, 441.1045, 423.0937, 397.1142, 369.1188, and 217.0496. Based on previous studies [12] and a reference standard, Peak X23 was identified as parishin B. The characteristic fragmentation patterns of gastrodin A and parishin B are described in Figures 4(a) and 4(b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

MS/MS spectra and the proposed fragmentation pathways. (a) Parishin B in negative ion mode. (b) Gastrodin A in negative ion mode. (c) Cnidilide or neocnilide in positive ion mode.

3.2.2. Chemical Fingerprint of TST in Positive Ion Modes

The analysis of the positive ion mode results showed that the characteristic components of Chuanxiong, including phthalides, were present. Here, compound Y27 was selected for analysis, and the chromatographic and spectral data of this compound were analyzed by comparison with the literature and reference materials. The cleavage pathway of phenyl peptides in Chuanxiong was also analyzed.

Peak Y27 gave a [M+H]+ ion at m/z 195.1378 and fragment ions at m/z 177.1344, 149.1309, and 107.0550. According to previous literature reports [9] and a reference standard, we identified peak Y27 as cnidilide or neocnilide. The characteristic fragmentation pattern of Y27 is shown in Figure 4(c)

According to our analysis, the main components of Tianma in negative ion mode were organic acids, phenols, and glycosides, with mainly phthalides detected in positive ion mode. The specific pyrolysis fragments were similar to the standards.

3.3. Detection and Identification of the Metabolites of TST in Rat Plasma

In order to identify as many potential pharmacologically active compounds as possible in TST, metabolic profiling of TST in rat plasma was performed. Compounds absorbed in vivo can be further metabolized by a variety of enzymes through oxidation, hydrolyzation, methylation, glucuronidation, and sulfation. Only peaks that were detected in the dosed plasma samples but not in blank samples were considered as probable metabolites. The mass spectra of the metabolites were examined in positive ion mode. These were further analyzed by using Peakview 1.2 to identify expected and unexpected metabolites from different metabolic pathways, and their structures were identified by tandem MS. We selected senkyunolide D or 4,7-dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide and senkyunolide A as examples of the structural identification process. The metabolites of these compounds and others are summarized in Table 2, and their TIC and extract ion chromatogram (EICs) are shown in Figures 58.

Table 2.

Metabolites identified in plasma of rats after oral administration by UPLC/Q-TOF MS.

No. Parent compounds Metabolic pathways Formula tR (min) [M+H]+ (m/z) Error (ppm) Product ions
Calculated Measure
1 4,7-Dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide, senkyunolide D Prototype C12H14O4 9.75 223.0965 223.0963 −1 177.0899, 167.0387, 149.0226, 121.0278, 91.0541
2 4,7-Dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide, senkyunolide D Hydroxyl and methyl conjugation C13H16O5 10.78 253.1071 253.1071 0.2 235.0963, 221.0829, 202.0596, 193.0489, 179.0332, 175.0379, 150.0301, 121.0268
3 4,7-Dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide, senkyunolide D Sulfate conjugation C12H14SO7 9.2 303.0533 303.0535 0.5 285.0430, 205.0858, 187.0753, 177.0904, 149.0244, 121.0283, 91.0534
4 4,7-Dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide, senkyunolide D Glucuronide conjugation C18H22O10 10.6 399.1286 399.1285 −0.3 223.0969, 205.0847, 177.0883, 167.0331, 149.0233, 121.0315
5 4,7-Dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide, senkyunolide D Hydrogenation and glucuronide conjugation C18H24O10 8.67 401.1442 401.1444 0.3 225.4427, 207.1017, 189.0924, 172.0884, 165.0548, 141.0170, 119.0851, 113.0288
6 4,7-Dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide, senkyunolide D Hydroxyl and glucuronide conjugation C18H22O11 8.92 415.1235 415.1238 0.7 227.0584, 221.0824, 167.0331
7 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahy-dro-6,7-dihydroxyphthalide Prototype C12H18O5 7.76 243.1227 243.1225 −0.7 165.0909, 151.0414, 137.0951, 123.0431, 107.0499, 91.0546, 85.0648
8 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahy-dro-6,7-dihydroxyphthalide Methyl conjugation C13H20O5 10.01 257.1384 257.1381 −1 221.1211, 207.0993, 165.0913, 137.0951, 123.0434
9 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahy-dro-6,7-dihydroxyphthalide Cystein conjugation C15H23O6NS 7.67 346.1319 346.1319 0 328.1222, 310.1111, 264.1056, 238.0916, 223.0771, 207.1018, 165.0923, 137.0955
10 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahy-dro-6,7-dihydroxyphthalide Oxidation and cystein conjugation C15H23O7NS 9.47 362.1268 362.1267 −0.3 327.0911, 247.1337, 229.1216, 151.0746
11 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahy-dro-6,7-dihydroxyphthalide N-Acetyl-L-cysteine conjugation C17H25O8NS 5.97 404.1374 404.1372 −0.5 205.0833, 171.1364
12 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahy-dro-6,7-dihydroxyphthalide Desat and S-GSH conjugation C22H33O11N3S 4.39 548.1909 548.1921 2.3 473.1636, 419.1465, 205.0860
13 3-Butyl-3-hydroxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahy-dro-6,7-dihydroxyphthalide H2O conjugation C12H20O6 4.65 261.1333 261.1320 −4.6 261.1310
14 3-Carboxyethyl-phthalide Prototype C10H8O4 7.28 193.0495 193.0490 −2.7 178.0257, 150.0323, 133.0277, 122.0361, 105.0338, 77.0388
15 3-Carboxyethyl-phthalide Methyl conjugation C11H10O4 11.52 207.0652 207.0646 −3 147.0441, 131.0502, 103.0546, 91.0533
16 3-Carboxyethyl-phthalide Glucuronide conjugation C16H16O10 5.51 369.0816 369.0822 1.5 193.0493
17 3-Carboxyethyl-phthalide Hydroxyl and glucuronide conjugation C16H16O11 5.72 385.0765 385.0758 −2.1 209.0455
18 3-Carboxyethyl-phthalide Hydrogenation C10H10O4 7.64 195.0652 195.0651 −0.6 177.0547, 149.0609, 145.0276, 134.0354, 117.0309, 89.0395
19 Cnidilide, neocnilide Prototype C12H18O2 16.14 195.1380 195.1377 −1.5 177.1350, 149.1348, 125.0599, 107.0873, 97.0640, 91.0550, 79.0543
20 Cnidilide, neocnilide Methyl conjugation C13H20O2 15.63 209.1536 209.1537 0.4 193.0211, 167.1088, 153.0917, 121.0648, 68.9961
21 Cnidilide, neocnilide Acetyl conjugation C14H20O3 12.45 237.1485 237.1483 −1.1 177.0257
22 Cnidilide, neocnilide Hydroxyl and acetyl conjugation C14H20O4 12.46 253.1434 253.1435 0.4 235.1340, 193.0856, 157.1012, 135.0816
23 Cnidilide, neocnilide Oxidation and cystein conjugation C15H23O4NS 10.07 314.1421 314.1424 1.1 268.1343, 193.1185
24 Cnidilide, neocnilide Hydroxyl and glucuronide conjugation C18H26O9 9.62 387.1650 387.1650 0.1 211.1330, 193.1223, 175.1129, 147.1168, 121.0368
25 Cnidilide, neocnilide 2Hydroxyl and glucuronide conjugation C18H26O10 8.02 403.1599 403.1598 −0.2 227.1287, 209.1174, 191.1065, 171.1373, 163.1123, 153.0549, 145.1025, 141.0186, 135.1164, 121.0995
26 Cnidilide, neocnilide 2Hydroxyl conjugation C12H18O4 8.68 227.1278 227.1279 0.7 191.1057, 163.1115, 153.0554, 145.1001, 135.0444, 105.0705, 91.0541
27 Senkyunolide A Prototype C12H16O2 14.81 193.1223 193.1222 −0.5 175.1118, 147.1170, 137.0580, 119.0848, 105.0710, 91.0556, 77.0393
28 Senkyunolide A Hydroxyl and methyl conjugation C13H18O3 15.85 223.1329 223.1326 −1.2 205.1224, 191.1060, 149.0235, 135.0429, 121.0279, 105.0697, 91.0542, 77.0397
29 Senkyunolide A Hydroxyl and acetylcysteine conjugation C17H25O6NS 10.35 372.1475 372.1475 −0.1 330.1375, 284.1322, 267.1048.239.0756, 209.1169, 191.1074, 162.0210, 153.0540, 130.0492
30 Senkyunolide A Carboxyl and glucuronide conjugation C18H22O10 10.6 399.1286 399.1285 −0.3 223.0969, 205.0847, 177.0883, 159.0293, 149.0233, 131.0840, 85.0275
31 Senkyunolide A 2Hydroxyl and glucuronide conjugation C18H24O10 8.67 401.1442 401.1444 0.3 225.1127, 207.1017, 189.0924, 172.0884, 165.0548, 141.0170, 119.0851, 113.0288, 85.0265, 73.0295
32 Senkyunolide A H2O conjugation C12H18O3 10.54 211.1329 211.1327 −0.9 193.1225, 175.1096, 147.1156, 129.0700, 105.0693, 93.0692, 79.0548
33 Senkyunolide A 2Hydroxyl conjugation C12H16O4 9.56 225.1121 225.1119 −1 207.1013, 189.0914, 165.0537, 133.0637, 105.0706, 91.0536, 81.0713
34 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Prototype C12H16O3 12.79 209.1172 209.1173 0.3 153.0686, 149.0594, 145.0984, 135.0472, 105.0693, 91.0562, 77.0409
35 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Methyl conjugation C13H18O3 15.85 223.1329 223.1326 −1.2 191.1060, 173.0946, 149.0235, 145.1014, 135.0429, 105.0697, 91.0542, 79.0551
36 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Acetyl conjugation C14H18O4 15.99 251.1278 251.1276 −0.6 177.1261, 149.0593, 69.0014, 57.0752
37 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Hydroxyl and acetyl conjugation C14H18O5 12.27 267.1227 267.1226 −0.4 249.1137, 193.0479, 189.0582, 135.0435, 119.0846
38 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Taurine conjugation C15H21O5NS 9.02 328.1213 328.1214 0.1 207.1015, 189.0911, 165.0541, 161.0955, 147.0814, 133.0644, 119.0859, 91.0538
39 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide N-Acetyl-L-cysteine conjugation C17H23O6NS 11.15 370.1319 370.1320 0.3 282.1162, 264.1083, 207.1015, 189.0911, 165.0544, 147.0785, 133.0652, 119.0858, 91.0546
40 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Hydrogenation and glucuronide conjugation C18H26O9 9.62 387.1650 387.1650 0.1 211.1330, 193.1223, 175.1129, 147.1168, 121.0638, 91.0546, 79.0562
41 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Hydroxyl and acetylcysteine conjugation C17H25O7NS 8.29 388.1425 388.1422 −0.6 207.1010, 164.0390, 122.0273, 105.0347, 79.0529
42 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Hydroxyl and glucuronide conjugation C18H24O10 8.67 401.1442 401.1444 0.3 267.1015, 225.1127, 207.1017, 189.0924, 172.0844, 141.0170, 113.0228, 85.0265, 73.0295
43 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Carboxyl and glucuronide conjugation C18H22O11 8.92 415.1235 415.1238 0.7 227.0584, 221.0824
44 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Desat and S-GSH conjugation C22H31O9N3S 9.17 514.1854 514.1854 0 439.1552, 385.1429, 282.1160, 207.1017, 189.0921, 179.0484, 162.0221, 144.0103, 116.0174, 76.0218
45 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide S-GSH conjugation C22H33O9N3S 8.61 516.2010 516.2010 −0.1 441.1694, 387.1593, 284.1315, 209.1173, 191.1055, 162.0212, 144.0109, 116.0175, 84.0447
46 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Hydrogenation C12H18O3 10.54 211.1329 211.1327 −0.9 193.1225, 175.1096, 151.0737, 147.1156, 129.0700, 121.0641, 105.0693, 93.0693, 91.0546, 77.0398
47 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Hydroxyl and demethyl conjugation C12H14O4 9.75 223.0965 223.0963 −1 177.0906, 149.0590, 145.0980, 105.0329, 91.0556, 77.0394
48 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide H2O conjugation C12H18O4 8.68 227.1278 227.1279 0.7 209.1169, 191.1057, 163.1115, 153.0554, 145.1001, 135.0444, 105.0705, 91.0541, 77.0388, 65.0402, 55.0198
49 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Demethyl and carboxyl conjugation C12H14O5 9.79 239.0914 239.0915 0.4 221.0816, 193.0885, 179.0336, 165.0173, 161.0227, 128.0633, 109.0292, 77.0376
50 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide 2hydrogenation and 2hydroxyl conjugation C12H18O5 7.76 243.1227 243.1225 −0.7 225.1135, 207.1017, 179.1084, 165.0909, 151.0414, 137.0951, 123.0431, 95.0486
51 Senkyunolide G, senkyunolide K,Z-6,7-epoxyligustilide Aromatic hydrocarbon oxidation C13H18O5 11.38 255.1227 255.1222 −2.1 195.1024, 135.0798, 131.0870
52 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Prototype C12H18O4 8.68 227.1278 227.1279 0.7 163.1115, 153.0554, 145.1001, 107.0705, 91.0541, 79.0544, 65.0402, 55.0198
53 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Methyl conjugation C13H20O4 11.42 241.1434 241.1433 −0.6 209.1147, 191.1067, 163.1089, 153.0559, 121.0652, 93.0717, 85.0663, 79.0663, 57.0698
54 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Hydroxyl and methyl conjugation C13H20O5 10.01 257.1384 257.1381 −1 221.1211, 207.0993, 165.0913, 161.0984, 137.0951, 123.0434, 93.0699, 79.0549, 67.0538
55 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Glycine conjugation C14H21O5N 7.49 284.1493 284.1495 0.8 238.1464, 209.1195, 191.1065, 163.1151, 153.0546, 135.1157, 117.0704, 91.0562, 76.0410, 57.0711
56 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Cystein conjugation C15H23O5NS 8.48 330.1370 330.1375 1.7 284.1324, 209.1176, 191.1066, 163.1120, 153.0544, 145.1015, 121.1008, 93.0695, 85.0650
57 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Taurine conjugation C14H23O6NS 7.56 334.1319 334.1319 0 209.1147, 181.1211, 153.0555, 126.0211, 108.0102, 91.0549
58 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Oxidation and cystein conjugation C15H23O6NS 7.67 346.1319 346.1319 0 328.1222, 310.1111, 264.1056, 238.0916, 207.1018, 195.0853, 165.0923, 137.0955
59 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 N-Acetyl-L-cysteine conjugation C17H25O7NS 8.29 388.1425 388.1422 −0.6 207.1010, 164.0390, 107.0491, 122.0273, 105.0347
60 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 Glucuronide conjugation C18H26O10 8.02 403.1599 403.1598 −0.2 227.1287, 209.1174, 191.1065, 163.1123, 153.0549, 145.1025, 135.1164, 121.0995, 93.0712
61 Senkyunolide J,N,R2 S-GSH conjugation C22H35O10N3S 4.96 534.2116 534.2113 −0.6 459.1795, 405.1696, 387.1582, 369.1490, 341.1469, 302.1438, 284.1303, 284.1303, 241.0913, 209.1157, 191.1075

Figure 5.

Figure 5

MS total ion chromatogram (TIC) of metabolites by UPLC/Q-TOF MS.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Metabolites of M1 and extract ion chromatogram (EIC).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Metabolites of M27 and extract ion chromatogram (EIC).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The extract ion chromatograms (EICs) of other metabolites detected.

Metabolite M1, which eluted at 9.75 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 223.0963 corresponding to C12H14O4. M1 was found to have major fragment ions in common with senkyunolide D, so M1 is most likely senkyunolide D or 4,7-dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide. Metabolite M2, which eluted at 10.78 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 253.1071 corresponding to C13H16O5. The characteristic production of m/z 235.0963 and 221.0839 was generated by loss of 18 Da and 18 + 14 Da, which implied loss of a H2O group and methyl group. Other product ions were identical to that of M1. Therefore, M2 may be a metabolite of senkyunolide D after hydroxyl and methyl conjugation. Metabolite M3, which eluted at 9.2 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 303.0535 corresponding to C12H14SO7. Its major fragment ions at m/z 285.0430 and 205.0858 were generated by the loss of 18 Da and 18 + 80 Da, which implied a H2O group and sulfate group. Other product ions were identical to that of M1. Therefore, M3 may be a metabolite of senkyunolide D following sulfation. Metabolite M4, which eluted at 10.6 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 399.1285 corresponding to C18H22O10. Its major fragment ion (m/z 223.0969) was generated by a loss of 176 Da, which implied a glucuronide group. Other product ions were identical to that of M1. Therefore, M4 might be a metabolite of senkyunolide D after glucuronidation. Metabolites M5 and M6 appear to correspond to M4 plus 2 Da or 16 Da, respectively. The product ions m/z 225.4427 and m/z 227.0584 have both lost 176 Da. Therefore, M5 might be a metabolite of senkyunolide D after hydrogenation and glucuronidation, while M6 might be a metabolite of senkyunolide D after hydroxylation and glucuronidation (metabolites of M1 and extract ion chromatograms (EICs) are shown in Figure 6).

Metabolite M27, which eluted at 14.81 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 193.1222 corresponding to C12H16O2. A major fragment ion was shared with senkyunolide A, suggesting that M27 is prototype of senkyunolide A. Metabolite M28, which eluted at 14.81 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 223.1328 corresponding to C13H18O3. Its major fragment ions m/z 205.1224 and 191.1060 were generated by loss of 18 Da and 18 + 14 Da, which implied loss of a H2O group and methyl group. Other product ions were identical to that of M27. Based on the possible metabolic reactions, M28 might be a metabolite of senkyunolide A after hydroxylation and methylation. Metabolite M29, which eluted at 10.35 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 372.1475 corresponding to C17H25O6NS. Its major fragment ions m/z 209.1269 and 191.1074 were generated by loss of 163 Da and 163 + 18 Da, which implied loss of an acetylcysteine group and H2O group. Other product ions were identical to that of M27. Therefore, M29 may be a metabolite of senkyunolide A after hydroxyl and acetylcysteine conjugation. Metabolite M30, which eluted at 10.60 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 399.1285 corresponding to C18H22O10. Its major fragment ions m/z 223.0969, 205.0847, and 177.0883 were generated by the loss of 176 Da, 176 + 18 Da, and 176 + 18 + 28 Da, which implied loss of a glucuronide group, H2O group, and CO group. Other product ions were identical to that of M27. Therefore, M30 may be a metabolite of senkyunolide A following carboxylation and glucuronidation. Metabolite M31, which eluted at 8.67 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 401.1444 corresponding to C18H24O10. Its major fragment ions m/z 225.1127, 207.1017, and 189.0924 were generated by loss of 176 Da, 176 + 18 Da, and 176 + 18 + 18 Da, which implied loss of a glucuronide group and two H2O groups. Other product ions were identical to that of M27. Therefore, M31 might be a metabolite of senkyunolide A after 2 hydroxylation events and glucuronidation. Metabolite M32, which eluted at 10.54 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 211.1327 corresponding to C12H18O3. Its major fragment ions were m/z 193.1225 and 175.1096. An m/z of 193.1225 (loss of 18 Da) corresponds to senkyunolide A, suggesting that M32 might be a metabolite of senkyunolide A after H2O conjugation. Metabolite M33, which eluted at 9.56 min, formed a molecular ion of [M+H]+ at m/z 225.1119 corresponding to C12H16O4. Its major fragment ions m/z 207.1013 and 189.0914 were generated by loss of 18 Da and 18 + 18 Da, which implied loss of one or two H2O groups. Other product ions were identical to that of M27. Therefore, M33 might be a metabolite of senkyunolide A after 2 hydroxylation events (metabolites of M27 and extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) are shown in Figure 7).

Sixty-one metabolites were identified in rat plasma. Through the analysis of these 61 metabolites, it was found that hydroxylation and glucuronidation were the main metabolic ways following oral administration of TST. From the identified metabolites, it can be speculated that after absorption of TST by human blood, most of the compounds undergo hydroxylation and glucuronidation, which allow TST to play a positive role in the treatment of migraine and blood stasis headaches. This provides a basis for follow-up research on the medical uses of TST. At the same time, from the information obtained on the metabolites, it can be seen that the main metabolites in positive ion mode of TST are concentrated as chuanxiong lactones, but there are no effective metabolites from Tianma. It is possible that Tianma metabolites are mainly present in the negative ion mode of plasma or in feces, urine, and bile, which requires further study.

4. Conclusion

In this study, UPLC/Q-TOF MS was used to comprehensively determine the chemical fingerprint and metabolic profile of TST after intragastric administration. In the analysis of the chemical constituents of TST, 77 compounds were identified, including 39 compounds identified in negative ion mode and 38 compounds identified in positive ion mode. In order to elucidate the mass spectrometric pyrolysis law of the main compounds in TST, gastrodin A, parishin B, and cnidilide or neocnilide were specifically analyzed, and the results were completely consistent with the results in reference standards and the reported literature. And 61 metabolites of TST in rat plasma were detected, which were mainly metabolites of 7 compounds. Two prototypes (senkyunolide D or 4,7-dihydroxy-3-butylphthalide and senkyunolide A) and their metabolites were analyzed in detail, which showed hydroxylation and glucuronidation were the main metabolic pathways following oral administration. This study expanded our understanding of the chemical constituents of TST, studied its metabolic spectrum for the first time, and clarified its main metabolic pathway in plasma, which will lay the foundation for follow-up studies of the pharmacological mechanism of TST.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81560638), Young Scientists Training Project of Jiangxi Province (no. 20162BCB23003), Jiangxi Province 5511 R&D Projects (no. 20165BCB19009), Jiangxi Province Talent Project (no. [2016]332), Nanchang Innovative Talent Team (no. [2018]274), and Research Projects of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Jiangxi Provincial Health Department (no. 2016A018).

Contributor Information

Zhifeng Li, Email: lizhifeng1976@hotmail.com.

Yulin Feng, Email: fengyulin2003@126.com.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in publication of this study.

References

  • 1.Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Vol. 1. Beijing, China: China Medical Science Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xia W., Zhu M., Zhang Z., et al. Effect of Tianshu capsule in treatment of migrane: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2013;33(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(13)60093-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhao L., Ouyang H., Wang Q. Chemical fingerprint analysis and metabolic profiling of 50% ethanol fraction of lomatogonium rotatum by ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole–time of flight mass spectrometry. Biomedical Chromatography. 2019;33 doi: 10.1002/bmc.4651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang L., Zhang J., Hong Y., et al. Phytochemical and pharmacological review of da chuanxiong formula: a famous herb pair composed of chuanxiong rhizoma and gastrodiae rhizoma for headache. Evidence-Based Complementray and Alternative Medicine. 2013;2013:16. doi: 10.1155/2013/425369.425369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ni S. M., Qian D. W., Shang E. X., Duan J. A., Guo J. M., Tang Y. P. Analysis of chemical composition of dachuanxiong fang by ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-quadrupole time of flight/mass spectrometry. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae. 2010;16(1):40–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shen L., Lin X., Hong Y., et al. Study on HPLC characteristic fingerprint of active components of dachuanxiong fang in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 2012;37(13):2017–2021. doi: 10.4268/cjcmm20121332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wei Y., Lin X., Zhang N., et al. UPLC-MS analysis of constituents of dachuanxiong fang active parts absorbed into blood. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 2011;36(9):p. 1245. doi: 10.4268/cjcmm20110929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yuan-Feng W., Ning Z., Xiao L., et al. Release characteristics in vitro and pharmacokinetics of Da Chuanxiong Fang multiunit drug delivery system in rats. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. 2011;46(9):1150–1155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Juanjuan L., Huimin G., Liangmian C., et al. Chemical profiling of an antimigraine herbal preparation, Tianshu capsule, based on the combination of HPLC, LC-DAD-MSn, and LC-DAD-ESI-IT-TOF/MS analyses. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014;2014:11. doi: 10.1155/2014/580745.580745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gao D., Wang B., Huo Z., et al. Analysis of chemical constituents in an herbal formula Jitong Ning Tablet. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2017;140:301–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wen-Lan L. I., Bai J., Sun Z., et al. Material base of in vivo invigorating Qi and enriching blood of Bazhen decoction by HPLC-ESI-MS. Chinese Herbal Medicines. 2012;4(4):282–286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6348.2012.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li Z., Wang Y., Ouyang H., et al. A novel dereplication strategy for the identification of two new trace compounds in the extract of Gastrodia elata using UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS/MS. Journal of Chromatography B. 2015;988:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kammerer D., Claus A., Carle R., Schieber A. Polyphenol screening of pomace from red and white grape varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2004;52(14):4360–4367. doi: 10.1021/jf049613b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schieber C., Wang L., Liu X., Cheng M., Xiao H. Chemical fingerprint and metabolic profile analysis of ethyl acetate fraction of Gastrodia elata by ultra performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 2016;1011:233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Keabetswe M., Bradley K., Paul S., et al. A metabolomics-guided exploration of the phytochemical constituents of vernonia fastigiata with the aid of pressurized hot water extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Molecules. 2017;22(8):p. 1200. doi: 10.3390/molecules22081200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miao C., Wu S., Luo B., Wang J., Chen Y. A new sesquiterpenoid from Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. Fitoterapia. 2010;81(8):1088–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chang X.-L., Jiang Z.-Y., Ma Y.-B., Zhang X.-M., Tsim K. W. K., Chen J.-J. Two new compounds from the roots of Ligusticum chuanxiong. Journal of Asian Natural Products Research. 2009;11(9):805–810. doi: 10.1080/10286020903071068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruan M., Li Y., Li X., Luo J., Kong L. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the major constituents in Chinese medicinal preparation Guan-Xin-Ning injection by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2012;59:184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Y., Peng S., Zhou Y., Yu K. B., Ding L. S. Two new phthalides from Ligusticum chuanxiong. Planta Medica. 2006;72(7):652–656. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-931560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang J., Lu X.-Q., Zhang C., et al. Anti-inflammatory ligustilides from Ligusticum chuanxiong hort. Fitoterapia. 2013;91:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2013.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES