Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Nov 14;8(46):e01289-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01289-19

Complete Genome Sequence of Klebsiella pneumoniae Siphophage Seifer

Adam J Salazar a, Lauren Lessor a, Chandler O’Leary a, Jason Gill a, Mei Liu a,
Editor: Simon Rouxb
PMCID: PMC6856288  PMID: 31727722

Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae poses a significant public health threat due to its resistance to antibiotics. Siphophage Seifer was isolated and characterized as part of an effort to develop phage therapeutics to control this pathogen. This report describes the complete genome sequence of phage Seifer, which is a distant member of the χ-like siphovirus phage cluster.

ABSTRACT

Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae poses a significant public health threat due to its resistance to antibiotics. Siphophage Seifer was isolated and characterized as part of an effort to develop phage therapeutics to control this pathogen. This report describes the complete genome sequence of phage Seifer, which is a distant member of the χ-like siphovirus phage cluster.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic human pathogen often linked to hospital-acquired infections (1). K. pneumoniae strains that carry the plasmid-borne and highly mobile K. pneumoniae carbapenemases (blaKPC) are of special concern due to their ability to degrade carbapenem antibiotics (13). Phages targeting KPC-positive K. pneumoniae could be used as alternatives to antibiotic treatments.

Phage Seifer was isolated from a wastewater sample collected from Brazos County, TX, in 2015 using a KPC-positive K. pneumoniae clinical isolate of sequence type 258 as the host. Host bacteria were cultured on tryptic soy broth or agar (Difco) at 37°C with aeration. Phages were cultured and propagated using the soft-agar overlay method (4). The phage was identified as a siphophage using negative-stain transmission electron microscopy performed at the Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center as described previously (5). Phage genomic DNA was prepared using a modified Promega Wizard DNA cleanup kit protocol as described previously (5). Pooled indexed DNA libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq Nano LT kit, and the sequence was obtained from the Illumina MiSeq platform using the MiSeq V2 500-cycle reagent kit following the manufacturer’s instructions, producing 697,877 paired-end 250-bp reads for the index containing the phage Seifer genome. FastQC 0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) was used to quality control the reads. The reads were trimmed with FastX Toolkit 0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/download.html) before being assembled using SPAdes 3.5.0 (6). Contig completion was confirmed with PCR using primers (5′-TGTATCCTACGCTCGTTCCC-3′, 5′-CCGATTATGACGCCGCTATG-3′) facing off the ends of the assembled contig and Sanger sequencing of the resulting product, with the contig sequence manually corrected to match the resulting Sanger sequencing read. GLIMMER 3.0 (7) and MetaGeneAnnotator 1.0 (8) were used to predict protein coding genes with manual verification, and tRNA genes were predicted with ARAGORN 2.36 (9). Rho-independent terminators were identified via TransTerm (http://transterm.cbcb.umd.edu/). Sequence similarity searches were performed using BLASTp 2.2.28 (10) with a maximum expectation cutoff of 0.001 against the NCBI nonredundant (nr), UniProt Swiss-Prot (11), and TrEMBL databases. InterProScan 5.15-54.0 (12), LipoP (13), and TMHMM 2.0 (14) were used to predict protein function. All analyses were conducted at default settings via the CPT Galaxy (15) and WebApollo (16) interfaces (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-pub).

Phage Seifer has a complete genome of 58,197 bp assembled at 212-fold coverage. It has a GC content of 56% and a coding density of 95%. Seifer is a distant member of the χ-like phage cluster (17), with similarity to phage χ in the left arm of the genome. Out of 82 total predicted proteins in phage Seifer, 43 and 45 proteins show similarity to proteins encoded by Salmonella phage χ (GenBank accession no. NC_025442) (18, 19) and Escherichia phage Utah (GenBank accession no. KY014601) (20), respectively, based on BLASTp with an E value of <0.001. The 12-bp 5′ extended overhang sequences (5′-GGTGCGCAGAGC-3′) in phages χ and Utah were identified in phage Seifer at the beginning of the genome. As determined by BLASTn against the NCBI nucleotide (nt) database, Seifer is closely related to Klebsiella phage Soft (GenBank accession no. MN106244) at the nucleotide level by sharing 85% overall identity (E value, 0).

Data availability.

The genome sequence of phage Seifer was submitted to GenBank under the accession no. MH817999. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample numbers are PRJNA222858, SRR8556780, and SAMN10904482, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (awards EF-0949351 and DBI-1565146) and by the National Institutes of Health (NIAID award AI121689). Additional support came from the Center for Phage Technology (CPT), an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife, and from the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics at Texas A&M University.

We thank Karen Frank at the NIH Clinical Center for providing bacterial isolates. We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff and the Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center. This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Phage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Satlin MJ, Chen L, Patel G, Gomez-Simmonds A, Weston G, Kim AC, Seo SK, Rosenthal ME, Sperber SJ, Jenkins SG, Hamula CL, Uhlemann AC, Levi MH, Fries BC, Tang YW, Juretschko S, Rojtman AD, Hong T, Mathema B, Jacobs MR, Walsh TJ, Bonomo RA, Kreiswirth BN. 2017. Multicenter clinical and molecular epidemiological analysis of bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in the CRE epicenter of the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02349-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02349-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sanchez GV, Master RN, Clark RB, Fyyaz M, Duvvuri P, Ekta G, Bordon J. 2013. Klebsiella pneumoniae antimicrobial drug resistance, United States, 1998–2010. Emerg Infect Dis 19:133–136. doi: 10.3201/eid1901.120310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tumbarello M, Viale P, Viscoli C, Trecarichi EM, Tumietto F, Marchese A, Spanu T, Ambretti S, Ginocchio F, Cristini F, Losito AR, Tedeschi S, Cauda R, Bassetti M. 2012. Predictors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae: importance of combination therapy. Clin Infect Dis 55:943–950. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Adams MK. 1959. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, Inc, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gill JJ, Berry JD, Russell WK, Lessor L, Escobar-Garcia DA, Hernandez D, Kane A, Keene J, Maddox M, Martin R, Mohan S, Thorn AM, Russell DH, Young R. 2012. The Caulobacter crescentus phage phiCbK: genomics of a canonical phage. BMC Genomics 13:542. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.The UniProt Consortium. 2018. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:2699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Juncker AS, Willenbrock H, Von Heijne G, Brunak S, Nielsen H, Krogh A. 2003. Prediction of lipoprotein signal peptides in Gram-negative bacteria. Protein Sci 12:1652–1662. doi: 10.1110/ps.0303703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cock PJ, Gruning BA, Paszkiewicz K, Pritchard L. 2013. Galaxy tools and workflows for sequence analysis with applications in molecular plant pathology. PeerJ 1:e167. doi: 10.7717/peerj.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee E, Helt GA, Reese JT, Munoz-Torres MC, Childers CP, Buels RM, Stein L, Holmes IH, Elsik CG, Lewis SE. 2013. Web Apollo: a Web-based genomic annotation editing platform. Genome Biol 14:R93. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grose JH, Casjens SR. 2014. Understanding the enormous diversity of bacteriophages: the tailed phages that infect the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae. Virology 468–470:421–443. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee JH, Shin H, Choi Y, Ryu S. 2013. Complete genome sequence analysis of bacterial-flagellum-targeting bacteriophage chi. Arch Virol 158:2179–2183. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1700-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hendrix RW, Ko CC, Jacobs-Sera D, Hatfull GF, Erhardt M, Hughes KT, Casjens SR. 2015. Genome sequence of Salmonella phage chi. Genome Announc 3:e01229-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01229-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leavitt JC, Heitkamp AJ, Bhattacharjee AS, Gilcrease EB, Casjens SR. 2017. Genome sequence of Escherichia coli tailed phage Utah. Genome Announc 5:e01494-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01494-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence of phage Seifer was submitted to GenBank under the accession no. MH817999. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample numbers are PRJNA222858, SRR8556780, and SAMN10904482, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES