Abstract
A cluster of 4 bovine abortions caused by Coxiella burnetii occurred in a dairy herd in Uruguay during a 2-mo period. Case 1 consisted of a placenta from an aborted cow; cases 2–4 were fetuses and their placentas. Grossly, the placenta from one aborted cow had moderate, diffuse reddening of the cotyledons and loss of translucency of the intercotyledonary areas. No gross lesions were observed in the other 3 placentas. Microscopically, 2 of 4 placentas had fibrinonecrotizing placentitis with abundant intratrophoblastic gram-negative coccobacilli. C. burnetii was identified intralesionally by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in all 4 placentas, and by PCR and DNA sequencing in 3 placentas analyzed by these techniques. One fetus had mild neutrophilic alveolitis with multinucleate syncytial cells; no gross or microscopic lesions were observed in the other 2 fetuses examined. The lungs of the 3 fetuses were negative for C. burnetii by IHC. Tests performed to investigate other possible causes of abortions in the 4 cases were negative. C. burnetii causes Q fever in humans and coxiellosis in animals. Clusters of abortions in cattle by C. burnetii have not been reported previously, to our knowledge; this bacterium has been considered an opportunistic pathogen associated only with sporadic abortion in cattle. We present herein a cluster of 4 bovine abortions caused by C. burnetii in a dairy farm during a period of 2 mo and a review of the literature on C. burnetii infection in cattle.
Keywords: bovine abortion, Coxiella burnetii, coxiellosis, Q fever, zoonosis
Coxiella burnetii is a gram-negative, intracellular proteobacterium of worldwide distribution that causes query (Q) fever in humans and coxiellosis in animals.1,2,25 Infection by C. burnetii has been reported in a variety of mammals, including but not limited to, cattle, sheep, goats, buffaloes, pigs, horses, pacific harbor seals, and rodents.28,41 Several avian and invertebrate species can also be infected.6 Q fever is a zoonotic disease; people who work with animals or who drink raw milk are most at risk.32 In humans, C. burnetii infection can produce hepatitis, pneumonia, endocarditis, and abortions, mainly in immunocompromised individuals,45 but a large proportion of human infections are either subclinical or undiagnosed because clinical signs are usually nonspecific.44 In cattle, coxiellosis is mainly subclinical, but anorexia, stillbirth, and late-term abortion have been described.2 Herein we present a cluster of 4 bovine abortions caused by C. burnetii in a dairy cattle farm during a period of 2 mo, and review the literature on C. burnetii infection in cattle.
The 4 cases studied (cases 1–4) originated in a pasture-based, Brucella abortus–free, dairy cattle farm in the department of Colonia, Uruguay, between April and June 2017. Case 1 consisted of a placenta from an aborted American Holstein biotype cow; cases 2–4 included fetuses and the placentas of 2 American Holstein biotype cows (cases 2 and 4) and 1 New Zealand biotype cow (case 3). The affected dairy herd was composed of 356 Holstein cows, including 279 of the American biotype and 77 of the New Zealand biotype. The latter had been introduced to the herd between March and May 2017 from 3 different commercial dairy farms in Uruguay. The gestational age of the 3 fetuses examined was estimated to be 240–270 d based on crown-rump length; presence or absence of hair on lips, eyebrows, and muzzle; eruption of incisor teeth; and presence or absence of horn pits. In case 1, the abortion occurred in the third trimester of gestation, although the fetus was not available to estimate the gestational age more precisely. Gross examination of the placentas and autopsies of the fetuses were performed.
All fetuses and placentas were in a mild state of postmortem decomposition. Grossly, the placenta from case 1 had moderate, diffuse reddening of the cotyledons and loss of translucency of the intercotyledonary areas (Fig. 1). No gross lesions were observed in the other placentas or any of the fetuses. Samples of placentas and fetal tissues, including lung, liver, kidney, brain, spleen, thymus, lymph nodes, heart, tongue, skeletal muscle, and gastrointestinal tract, were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (pH 7) for 48 h, dehydrated through graded alcohols to xylene, embedded in paraffin, cut at 4–6 µm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Selected sections were also stained with Gram stain.
Figures 1–4.
Placentas from aborted cows infected with Coxiella burnetii. Figure 1. The cotyledon in case 1 has moderate and diffuse reddening, and the peripheral intercotyledonary area exhibits loss of translucency. Figure 2. The stroma of the chorionic villus in this cotyledon in case 4 is expanded by abundant neutrophilic infiltrate and necrotic debris. H&E. Figure 3. Clusters of basophilic bacteria in case 4 expand the cytoplasm of numerous trophoblasts (arrows), some of which have a pyknotic nucleus displaced to the periphery of the cell and are detached from the basement membrane. There is also cell debris in the lumen. H&E. Figure 4. Diffuse intralesional immunoreactivity for C. burnetii in the chorionic villi epithelium in case 4. Inset: higher magnification showing strong granular intracytoplasmic immunoreactivity in numerous trophoblasts. Immunohistochemistry for C. burnetii, hematoxylin counterstain.
Microscopically, the 4 placentas had fibrinonecrotizing placentitis characterized by transmural infiltration of the chorioallantois with abundant viable and degenerate neutrophils, fewer lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages, necrotic debris, and fibrin. Many trophoblasts were necrotic. In 2 of the placentas, myriad ~1-µm long basophilic coccobacilli were present multifocally in the cytoplasm of trophoblasts (Figs. 2, 3). Diffuse, transmural edema was also observed in the intercotyledonary area. The fetus in case 3 had mild neutrophilic alveolitis with multinucleate syncytial cells within the alveolar spaces. No other significant microscopic lesions were observed in other tissues of any of the other fetuses examined or in the placentas.
Selected sections of the 4 placentas and lungs from the 3 fetuses were processed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for C. burnetii and Chlamydia spp. as described previously.18,21 Briefly, antigen retrieval was performed in a decloaking chamber, following quenching the endogenous peroxidase with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Mouse monoclonal antibodies (AB-COX-MAB; U.S. Department of Defense, Critical Reagents Program; anti-Chlamydia lipopolysaccharide antibody; Virostat, Westbrook, ME), were used for Coxiella spp. and Chlamydia spp. IHC.18,21 Then, the anti-species horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled polymer (Biocare, Pacheco, CA) and a detection system, with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (Thermo Scientific, Fremont, CA) as the chromogen substrate solution, were applied. Samples of caprine placentas that were PCR-positive or -negative for these microorganisms were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.
Sections of the 4 placentas and brains from the 3 fetuses were processed by Neospora caninum IHC as described previously.15 Briefly, a goat polyclonal antibody against N. caninum (VMRD, Pullman, WA) was used as a primary antibody, followed by anti-goat IgG HRP-labeled polymer (Enzyme polymer detection kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (Dako, Santa Clara, CA). Brain from a calf that had been experimentally inoculated with N. caninum was used as a positive control; brain from a healthy calf with no brain lesions was used as a negative control.
IHC for C. burnetii revealed abundant intralesional antigen in the 4 placentas (Fig. 4.) The immunoreaction was mainly within the trophoblasts of the chorionic villi, seen as granular intracytoplasmic staining. The sections of lung of the 3 fetuses were negative for this test. Chlamydia spp. and N. caninum IHC were negative in all of the tested samples.
DNA from 3 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded placentas (cases 1, 3, 4) was extracted using a commercial kit (QIAamp DNA FFPE tissue kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), concentrated (DNA clean & concentrator kit; Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, and used as template for PCR. The PCR for C. burnetii was performed as described previously29 in 25-µL final volume reactions, using a master mix (Green master mix; Promega, Madison, WI), 800 nM of each primer (forward: TATGTATCCACCGTAGCCAGTC; reverse: CCCAACAACACCTCCTTATTC), and 5 µL of template. An initial denaturation period of 5 min at 95°C was done, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 62°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. This ended with a final extension step at 72°C for 3 min. The PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel (UltraPure; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The reactions were purified (Invitrogen quick gel extraction and PCR purification combo kit; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). The gel extraction products were sent for Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ), and sequences were also aligned by a kit (SeqMan Pro 13, Lasergene 13; DNASTAR, Madison, WI). C. burnetii DNA was amplified by PCR, and the amplicon sequenced in cases 1, 3, and 4.
Placenta, liver, lung, and abomasal fluid were inoculated onto blood and MacConkey agar and incubated at 37°C under aerobic conditions. The same specimens were also inoculated into Skirrow medium and incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5–10% carbon dioxide, for 4 d.12 Direct immunofluorescence for Campylobacter spp. was done on impression smears from placenta, abomasal fluid, lung, and liver, fixed in acetone at room temperature, and incubated with an anti-Campylobacter conjugate.20 Placenta, liver, kidney, and abomasal fluid were also inoculated into Leptospira medium base EMJH agar and incubated in aerobiosis at 29°C for up to 6 mo.48 The abomasal fluid was examined under dark-field microscopy for Campylobacter spp. and Tritrichomonas foetus. No aerobic bacterial pathogens or Leptospira spp. were isolated, and no Campylobacter spp. or T. foetus were observed in any of the samples.
PCR tests for bovine parainfluenza virus 3 (BPIV-3; species Bovine respirovirus 3) and bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 (BVDV-1; species Pestivirus A) were performed on pools of liver, lung, spleen, kidney, and heart of the 3 fetuses, and the 4 placentas, as described previously.30,33 PCR tests for BPIV-3 and BVDV-1 were negative.
A commercial indirect ELISA (IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, ME) for IgG antibodies against C. burnetii was performed on serum from the dams of the 4 aborted fetuses. This test was positive on serum from the dam of case 4 but negative for the other 3 dams. Sera from the 4 aborted dams and pericardial fluid from the 3 fetuses were analyzed for Leptospira serovars Grippotyphosa, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Pomona, Canicola, Hardjo-bovis, Hardjo-prajitno, and Wolfii using the microagglutination test (MAT).48 The MAT was negative at 1:10 for fetal samples and negative at ≥200 for the dams.48
C. burnetii can be transmitted to the fetus either hematogenously, affecting mainly the liver, or transplacentally, causing pneumonia and enteritis following the ingestion of contaminated amniotic fluid.2,11 Among post-natal animals, C. burnetii is transmitted by inhalation of aerosols from contaminated fluids and tissues shed by parturient or post-parturient cows.17,24 Infected dams shed large amounts of bacteria in the feces, milk, and fetal membranes, regardless of the infection status of the birthed calf.2 The placenta is the most frequent source of infection because the bacterial load can be as high as 109 cells/g of tissue, and the infective dose can be as low as 1 cell.25 It has been postulated that C. burnetii can also be transmitted by ticks.19
Two microscopic forms of C. burnetii are recognized based on their pathogenicity (i.e., large-cell variant and small-cell variant). The large-cell variant is the vegetative form in infected cells. The small-cell variant is the extracellular form, which is shed in milk, urine, feces, placenta, and amniotic fluid.45 The small-cell variant is resistant to high temperature and desiccation, characteristics that confer to this form of C. burnetii the capacity for airborne transmission and to survive in the environment for years.32
Although there seems to be little doubt about the role of C. burnetii in bovine abortion, the role that this microorganism may have in other reproductive disorders of cattle, such as infertility, premature delivery, endometritis, metritis, and mastitis is controversial.1,16 C. burnetii DNA has frequently been detected in cases of endocarditis in cattle at slaughter3; however, the clinical significance of this finding remains undetermined. C. burnetii DNA and its antigen have also been detected in endometrial biopsies of cows with repeat breeding failure.16 Although these findings suggest an association between C. burnetii and a reproductive disorder in cattle, the findings have not been compared to those of healthy cows, and final conclusions can therefore not be drawn.16
Differences in the clinical presentations of coxiellosis in cattle could be the result of differences in bacterial genotype. Analysis of the genetic diversity of C. burnetii from different sources (bulk-tank milk and surface dust) by multi-locus variable number tandem repeats analysis showed high genotypic diversity.38 However, the presence in cattle of genotypes closely related to those identified in humans does not seem to be common.38
C. burnetii has been considered an opportunistic pathogen associated with sporadic abortion in cattle.1,4,8,41 An outbreak of coxiellosis in cattle in southeast Poland affected 220 dairy cows and at least 1,300 people.7 Although there were no bovine abortions reported in this particular outbreak, seroconversion was reported in cows that had stillborn calves in later outbreaks in this region.27,43 This was the largest outbreak of coxiellosis in humans linked to cattle. In The Netherlands, there was also another significant epidemic of Q fever in people, but it was linked to dairy goats and dairy sheep.40
In cattle, shedding of C. burnetii is higher during the peripartum period and can then decrease to barely detectable levels.22 C. burnetii can infect and remain latent in the mammary gland and lymph nodes, but shedding of the bacteria can occur during subsequent calving seasons and lactation.32
The diagnosis of C. burnetii abortion in cattle is confirmed by detection of the agent in association with placental lesions, coupled with ruling out other causes of bovine abortion.1,2 However, other factors should be considered, such as type and severity of the lesions in the placenta and abundance of C. burnetii. The latter is an important consideration to establish the role of C. burnetii in cases of bovine abortion because this microorganism can be found in tissues of clinically healthy cattle.1 In a prospective study of ovine and caprine abortion using real-time PCR,23 the authors concluded that the use of a single positive PCR result used for diagnosis of C. burnetii abortion can be misleading because the mere presence of nucleic acids of this agent does not confirm the disease. That study23 suggested that determination of the amount of C. burnetii DNA in tissues provides additional value to real-time PCR results, given that increased copies of DNA correlated with the presence of lesions and the results of other tests for C. burnetii. Unfortunately, quantitative PCR was not available during the diagnostic workup of our 4 cases.
Gross examination of the placenta of aborted cattle coupled with histopathology46 and IHC are key for the diagnosis, given that placentitis is the primary lesion caused by C. burnetii, with a strong statistical association between intralesional detection of the agent by IHC and placentitis.8 In laboratory submissions that include the fetus but not the placenta, diagnosis of C. burnetii abortion is challenging because fetal lesions are usually absent or scarce.8 When present, lesions are mainly restricted to the lungs.8 Nevertheless, fetal pneumonia is a nonspecific lesion that frequently accompanies infectious placentitis of a variety of causes. Even though molecular testing is adequate for rapid identification of C. burnetii in tissues and body fluids, the sole detection of this agent is of no diagnostic significance, given that C. burnetii can be carried and excreted by healthy cattle.1,2
Two of the aborted fetuses examined in our study had no gross or microscopic lesions; the third fetus (case 3) had only mild neutrophilic alveolitis with multinucleate syncytial cells. However, C. burnetii antigen was not detected by IHC in association with these lesions, and their etiologic role remains, therefore, undetermined. In our 4 cases, the presumptive diagnosis of C. burnetii infection was based on the histologic lesions observed in the placenta and confirmed by IHC and PCR. These results are similar to another report of lesions in placentas but not in fetuses.2
Caprine placental specimens were used as positive and negative controls for C. burnetii IHC. Although bovine control tissues would have been preferred, the IHC for C. burnetii in our laboratory has been validated with caprine specimens. Histologic lesions compatible with coxiellosis should be complemented by pathogen detection analysis to improve the possibility of arriving at an etiologic diagnosis of bovine abortion. In a study from California of 709 aborted bovine fetuses, C. burnetii was identified as the causal agent in only 1 (0.14%).14 Similarly, an 11-y study from Canada revealed that only 10 (1.4%) of 722 dairy cattle abortions were attributable to C. burnetii, and concluded that the agent was infrequently associated with bovine abortion.8 Furthermore, in several case series from Argentina,10 Brazil,5 Uruguay (Easton C. Pathologic study of the main infectious causes of bovine abortion in Uruguay [Master’s thesis]. Montevideo, Uruguay: Universidad de la República, 2006) and the United States,4,26 C. burnetii was not reported as a cause of bovine abortion. This could be because of a low frequency of infection coupled with the difficulty of reaching an etiologic diagnosis of C. burnetii abortion.14
Several studies have confirmed the presence of antibodies against C. burnetii in human and animal populations in South America, indicating that the organism is present on the continent.13,35 One study from Brazil established the presence of the agent in a human clinical case associated with PCR-positive animals.31 In Uruguay, the presence of antibodies against C. burnetii in slaughterhouse workers has been associated with a history of clinical signs, and a clinical case of endocarditis,35 showing that this agent is an occupational hazard for slaughterhouse personnel.
Healthy cows can carry and excrete C. burnetii,2 suggesting that in the cluster of cases presented here, carrier healthy cows might have been the source of infection. In this farm, before the onset of the disease, a herd of 77 Holstein cows of the New Zealand biotype had been introduced into the group. Although it was not possible to conclude that this cattle movement was responsible for the introduction of C. burnetii, reports have mentioned that dairy cow herds that contain purchased cows from abroad have a 2.68 greater chance of C. burnetii infection than closed herds.9 Nevertheless, the potential role of wildlife, other domestic animals such as dogs and cats, or people, in the transmission of the infection in our cases cannot be ruled out.
C. burnetii has been transmitted experimentally by several species of ticks, including Rhipicephalus spp., Ornithodoros spp., and Ixodes spp.19,37 Even though these 3 genera of ticks are present in Uruguay,36 they were not present in the dairy herd in our study, which is in an official tick-free zone.34
Q fever should be considered a potential hazard for dairy farm workers. In our cluster and following Uruguayan Public Health Department guidelines, 27 farm and laboratory workers were examined for C. burnetii by an indirect fluorescent antibody test,47 and 10 (37%) of them had IgG phase II and IgM phase II antibody titers against C. burnetii (data not shown). It is speculated that these individuals had contact with the aborted animals and fetal tissues. However, conclusions about the sources of the human antibody response are difficult to make because the test used does not allow determination of the duration of infection, and the previous serologic status of these patients was unknown.39,42
C. burnetii can cause clusters of abortions in cattle. Tests for the identification of this agent should be included in the routine bovine abortion test panel. The placenta is essential for the diagnosis of C. burnetii abortion.
Acknowledgments
We thank Bruno Lopez, Yisell Perdomo, Cecilia Monesiglio, Anderson Saravia, and all of the graduate students from the animal health platform at INIA, Jennifer McKenna from UW, and Karen Sverlow and Juliann Beingesser from CAHFS for valuable technical assistance. In memory of Dr. Néstor D’Anatro from the Division de Laboratorios Veterinarios (DILAVE) of the Uruguayan Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP).
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: This work was funded by grant FSSA_X_2014_1_105696 of the Uruguayan Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII).
ORCID iDs: Francisco A. Uzal
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-1878
Federico Giannitti
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-6848
References
- 1. Agerholm JS. Coxiella burnetii associated reproductive disorders in domestic animals—a critical review. Acta Vet Scand 2013;55:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Agerholm JS. Coxiella burnetii and reproductive disorders in cattle. Infect Genet Evol 2014;28:150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Agerholm JS, et al. Presence of Coxiella burnetii DNA in inflamed bovine cardiac valves. BMC Vet Res 2016;13:69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Anderson ML, et al. A survey of causes of bovine abortion occurring in the San Joaquin Valley, California. J Vet Diagn Invest 1990;4:283–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Antoniassi NAB, et al. Causas de aborto bovino diagnosticadas no Setor de Patologia Veterinária da UFRGS de 2003 a 2011 [Causes of bovine abortion diagnosed in the Pathology Section of UFRGS from 2003 to 2011]. Pesq Vet Bras 2013;69:69–72. Portuguese. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Berthová L, et al. The natural infection of birds and ticks feeding on birds with Rickettsia spp. and Coxiella burnetii in Slovakia. Exp Appl Acarol 2016;68:299–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bielawska-Drózd A, et al. Q fever—selected issues. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013;20:222–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bildfell RJ, et al. Coxiella burnetii infection is associated with placentitis in cases of bovine abortion. J Vet Diagn Invest 2000;12:419–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Boroduske A, et al. Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) infection in dairy cattle and associated risk factors in Latvia. Epidemiol Infect 2017;10:2011–2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Campero CM, et al. Aetiology of bovine abortion in Argentina. Vet Res Commun 2003;27:359–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Campero CM, et al. Chapter 3. In: Abortions and Other Reproductive Losses in Cattle. Diagnosis and Control. 1st ed Buenos Aires, Argentina: Hemisferio Sur S.A, 2017:104–109. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chaban B, et al. Isolation rates of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis from bovine preputial samples via passive filtration on nonselective medium versus selective medium, with and without transport medium. Am J Vet Res 2013;74:1066–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cicuttin GL, et al. Serological evidence of Rickettsia and Coxiella burnetii in humans of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2015;43:57–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Clothier K, Anderson M. Evaluation of bovine abortion cases and tissue suitability for identification of infectious agents in California diagnostic laboratory cases from 2007 to 2012. Theriogenology 2016;15:933–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Conrad PA, et al. In vitro isolation and characterization of a Neospora sp. from aborted bovine foetuses. Parasitology 1993;106:239–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. De Biase D, et al. Coxiella burnetii in infertile dairy cattle with chronic endometritis. Vet Pathol 2018;55:539–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. de Rooij MMT, et al. Detection of Coxiella burnetii in ambient air after a large Q fever outbreak. PLoS One 2016;11:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dilbeck PM, McElwain TF. Immunohistochemical detection of Coxiella burnetii in formalin-fixed placenta. J Vet Diagn Invest 1994;6:125–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Duron O, et al. The importance of ticks in Q fever transmission: what has (and has not) been demonstrated? Trends Parasitol 2015;31:536–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Figueiredo JF, et al. Evaluation of direct fluorescent antibody test for the diagnosis of bovine genital campylobacteriosis. Rev Latinoam Microbiol 2002;44:118–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Giannitti F, et al. Chlamydia pecorum: fetal and placental lesions in sporadic caprine abortion. J Vet Diagn Invest 2016;28:184–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hansen MS, et al. Coxiella burnetii associated placental lesions and infection level in parturient cows. Vet J 2011;190:135–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hazlett MJ, et al. A prospective study of sheep and goat abortion using real-time polymerase chain reaction and cut point estimation shows Coxiella burnetii and Chlamydophila abortus infection concurrently with other major pathogens. J Vet Diagn Invest 2013;3:359–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jones RM, et al. The infectious dose of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever). Applied Biosafety 2006;1:32–41. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kazar J. Coxiella burnetii infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1063:105–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kirkbride CA. Etiologic agents detected in a 10-year study of bovine abortions and stillbirths. J Vet Diagn Invest 1992;4:175–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Krzysztof Niemczuk, et al. Q fever in a cattle herd and humans in the south-eastern Poland. Laboratory Diagnosis of the disease using serological and molecular methods. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2011;55:593–598. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lapointe JM, et al. Placentitis due to Coxiella burnetii in a Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi). J Vet Diagn Invest 1999;6:541–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lorenz H, et al. PCR detection of Coxiella burnetii from different clinical specimens, especially bovine milk, on the basis of DNA preparation with a silica matrix. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:4234–4237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Macías-Rioseco M, et al. Fetal pathology in an aborted Holstein fetus infected with bovine parainfluenza virus-3 genotype A. Vet Pathol 2019;56:277–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Mares-Guia MA, et al. Molecular identification of the agent of Q fever, Coxiella burnetii in domestic animals in State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2014;2:231–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Maurin M, Rauoult D. Q. fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:518–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Maya L, et al. Molecular diversity of bovine viral diarrhea virus in Uruguay. Arch Virol 2016;161:529–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Miraballes C, Riet-Correa F. A review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay. Exp Appl Acarol 2018;75:383–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Moreira RE, et al. Fiebre “Q” en Uruguay [“Q” fever in Uruguay]. Rev Inst Med trop S. Paulo 1987;29:168–173. Spanish. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Nava S, et al. Tick classification, external tick anatomy with a glossary, and biological cycles. In: Ticks of the Southern Cone of America: Diagnosis, Distribution, and Hosts with Taxonomy, Ecology and Sanitary Importance. 1st ed. London, UK: Academic Press, 2017:1–23. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Pacheco RC, et al. Coxiella burnetii in ticks, Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19:344–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Piñero A, et al. A genetic diversity and variation over time of Coxiella burnetii genotypes in dairy cattle and the farm environment. Infect Genet Evol 2015;31:231–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Raven CF, et al. Solitary IgM phase II response has a limited predictive value in the diagnosis of acute Q fever. Epidemiol Infect 2012;140:1950–1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Roest HI, et al. The Q fever epidemic in The Netherlands: history, onset, response and reflection. Epidemiol Infect 2011;139:1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sawyer LA, et al. Q fever: current concepts. Rev Infect Dis 1987;9:935–946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Schneeberger PM, et al. Real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010;17:286–290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tylewska-Wierzbanowska S, et al. Epidemic of Q fever in Leszno district in Poland. Eur J Epidemiol 1991;7:307–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. van der Hoek W, et al. Relation between Q fever notifications and Coxiella burnetii infections during the 2009 outbreak in The Netherlands. Euro Surveill 2012;17:20058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. van Schaik EJ, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of the obligate intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Nat Rev Microbiol 2013;11:561–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Vidal S, et al. Neglected zoonotic agents in cattle abortion: tackling the difficult to grow bacteria. BMC Vet Res 2017;13:373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wegdam-Blans MCA, et al. Evaluation of commonly used serological tests for detection of Coxiella burnetii antibodies in well-defined acute and follow-up sera. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2012;19:1110–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zarantonelli L, et al. Isolation of pathogenic Leptospira strains from naturally infected cattle in Uruguay reveals high serovar diversity, and uncovers a relevant risk for human leptospirosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]