Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Nov 15;9:16909. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53422-9

Evidence of CPV2c introgression into Croatia and novel insights into phylogeny and cell tropism

Dinko Novosel 1,8,, Tamas Tuboly 2, Gyula Balka 3, Levente Szeredi 4, Ivana Lojkic 5, Andreja Jungic 5, Zaklin Acinger-Rogic 6, Tahar Ait-Ali 7, Attila Csagola 2
PMCID: PMC6858334  PMID: 31729462

Abstract

Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV2) emerged for the first time in 1978 and evolved into two antigenic variants CPV2a and CPV2b and the third new antigenic variant CPV2c reported in 2000 in Italy. During 2014 unexplained outbreaks of gastroenteritis were observed in kennels where an extensive vaccination program was ongoing and where vaccinated animals showed pathologic lesions consistent with typical parvovirosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether CPV2 could have played a role in the emergence of these cases and to evaluate genetic or pathological specificities of the virus and the disease. Using PCR and phylogenetic analysis we showed that the CPV2c variant is circulating in Croatia and is in close relationships with isolates from North and South America. Histopathological lesions and cell tropism that are known for CPV2 we are reporting the identification of the virus in glial cells and ovaries. It seems that evolution of CPV and CPV2a-c and adaptation to dogs are two independent events. Croatian isolates had specific and some unique amino acid mutations under positive selection. The effect of the alterations on the immunoglobulin binding cannot be excluded.

Subject terms: Genome evolution, Viral pathogenesis

Introduction

Parvoviridae are a family of small DNA viruses divided into two subfamilies Parvovirinae and Densovirinae, which infect vertebrates and insects, respectively. Five genuses are members of the Parvovirinae subfamily: Protoparvovirus, Erythroparvovirus, Dependoparvovirus, Amdoparvovirus and Bocaparvovirus. Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV2) is a member of the Protoparvovirus genus and is host species specific such as Carnivore protoparvovirus 1, Feline panleukopenia virus, mink enteritis virus (MEV) and the raccoon parvovirus. CPV2 is genetically and antigenically unrelated to Carnivore bocaparvovirus 1, previously known as Canine minute virus (CnMV) or Canine parvovirus type 1 (CPV1), which causes neonatal mortality1. Parvoviruses are small (25 nm in diameter), non-enveloped and genome consist of an approximately 5200 nucleotides. VP1 is formed of the entire VP2 protein plus the addition of an extra domain at the N-terminal end. VP2 which forms 90% of viral capsid structural protein represents the main determinant for host interaction2. For this reason, over the years most studies were focused on the evolution of the VP2 gene, with limited studies on the nonstructural genes3. Also, NS gene sequences available in GenBank are relatively few if compared to partial or total length VP2 sequences. CPV2 first emerged in 1978 and quickly evolved into two antigenic variants CPV2a and CPV2b48. In 2000 a novel antigenic variant (CPV2c) was identified in Italy and subsequently spread to the neighboring countries9,10 whereas novel CPV2a variants have emerged in Hungary11. According to previous reports CPV is a variant of FPV that acquired the ability to infect canines through the acquisition of a small number of mutations in the capsid protein (VP2) gene responsible of change in surface-exposed residues1214. These viruses use the transferrin receptor type 1 (TfR) as their primary receptor for attaching to and infecting cells. Canine cells resist infection by FPV because that virus cannot bind to the canine TfR, in particular because of a unique glycosylation site present in the canine TfR13,1518. Four amino acid changes at VP2 residues 87, 101, 300, and 305 characterize differences of CPV2 and the CPV-2a variant. These four mutations map to or near the capsid surface and influence infection by altering binding to the carnivore transferrin receptor (TfR), the host cell attachment protein for these viruses19. Only two VP2 amino acid residues at position 426 (asparagine to aspartic acid) and 555 (isoleucine to valine have been identified (CPV-2a to CPV-2b)20. The new CPV2c variant harbours a mutation at residue 426 (asparagine/isoleucine to glutamate)21. However, as the CPV-2b and -2c antigenic strains differ from CPV-2a at only one position (VP2 residue 426), they are now considered to be variants of CPV-2a rather than distinct subtypes22. Although the site at position 426 confers only insignificant main chain movement, recent report suggests that Asp introduces a negative charge that is possibly blocking the interaction of some of antibodies23.

In most CPV2c outbreaks reported in adult dogs, the animals have undergone a full vaccination protocol24,25. Even considering all case reports of vaccination failures, there was no robust evidence for the absence of cross-protection from clinical disease between old and novel variants of CPV2 and the main issue is still related to the interference of vaccination by the maternal immunity26. The original viral strain designated as CPV2, and distinct from CPV1, can cause severe and fatal outbreaks of hemorrhagic gastroenteritis as well as subacute myocarditis in kennels and dog shelters27. Active viral circulation has often been exploited as a vaccination strategy to provide immune protection of dog population to reduce mortality and spread of the virus26.

CPV2 enters the host by the oronasal route. The virus replicates primarily in lymphoid cells prior to spreading to other mitotically active tissues including bone marrow and the germinal epithelium of the crypts of the small intestine, causing diarrhea9,2830. Diarrhea is usually severe and often hemorrhagic, with sloughing of intestinal mucosa and replacement by cuboidal epithelium associated with lymphopenia and neutropenia resulting from necrosis of precursor cells31,32. Atrophy of the villi, necrosis of the epithelial cells, distension of the Lieberkühn’s crypts containing erythrocytes, depletion of Peyer’s patches and severe hemorrhagic enteritis are common lesions observed in CPV2 cases. Usually, CPV2 causes disease in unvaccinated 1–6-month-old pups. Vaccinated pups are usually protected from the disease and from infection, unless immunization fails due to the presence of high titers of maternally derived antibodies30,33,34. Similarly, adult dogs (≥1 year) are usually not susceptible to CPV2 infection due to vaccination or previous infections with field strain8,27.

Prophylaxis of CPV2 infection relies mainly on extensive vaccination. In most cases these vaccines induce long-term immunity35,36 and consist of attenuated strains either the original CPV2 or its variant CPV2b37. During 2014, several unexplained outbreaks of hemorrhagic gastroenteritis were observed in kennels and dog shelters despite the ongoing extensive vaccination programs: necropsy revealed typical clinical signs of a parvovirosis infection. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether CPV2 could have played a role in the emergence of these cases and to evaluate genetic or pathological specificities of the virus and the disease using a range of methodological approaches including immunohistochemistry, in situ PCR, sequencing, phylogenetic and sequence analysis.

Results

Presence of CPV2 in samples and phylogenetic analysis

Out of 11 animals that had a typical gross pathology lesions consistent for canine parvovirosis, 9 were confirmed positive for CPV2 by PCR (Fig. 1). Out of the 9 positive samples, we identified 5 novel nucleotide sequences encoding the VP2 region which were submitted to phylogenetic analysis. Single Breakpoint Recombination test confirmed that there was no recombination and recombinant strains in the dataset that was analyzed (Supplementary information Recombination test using Single break point analysis). A total of 23 different phylogeny models were tested (Table 1). According to results of the tests of different phylogeny models the age of The Most Common Recent Ancestor (TMCRA) is around 38–83 y with a Molecular clock of around 1E-4 mutations per base/per year/per site. The highest Akaike’s Information Criterion for Markov’s Chain Monte Carlo samples (AICM)38 was achieved when the codon Shapiro-Rambaut-Drummond 2006 model (SRD06) model and the highly parametric Coalescent Bayesian Skyline prior were used. We included Relaxed Molecular Clocks, uncorrelated lognormal and exponential, since we expected that the rate of evolution varied among the branches of the tree. When Strict clock was used, AICM was found a little bit lower. In both cases Molecular clock and Treehigh values were inside 1 standard deviation of the mean. In particular Relaxed lognormal molecular clock distribution had lower AICM than Relaxed exponential molecular clock. According to the phylogeny model when SRD06 codon model, Relaxed lognormal molecular clock and Coalescent Bayesian Skyline prior were used, TMCRA was estimated to be 57 y ago with a Molecular clock of 1,33E-4 (1,05E-4-1,63E-4) which was slower than previously estimated which is ranging between 1E-4 - 4E-4 mutations per year/per site20.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Typical lesions found in necropsied dogs in which CPV2 infection was suspected. (A) Severe hemorrhagic enterocolitis; (B) Intestinal ecchymosis; (C) Hemorrhagic enterocolitis; (D) Severe hemorrhagic inflammation of the intestinal mucosa.

Table 1.

Results of analysis of testing of different phylogeny models.

Substitution model Molecular clock Demographic model AICM AICM S.E. Likelihood Time Clock Treeheight
Mean Stderr Stdev Variance Median
SRD06 lognormal Skyline 14750,389 0,87 −6920,868 0,6955 21,3149 454,3267 −6920,4303 1,33E-04 56,53
YANG96 lognormal Skyline 14814,664 1,319 −6881,9564 1,0399 22,9211 525,3759 −6881,4999 1,34E-04 57,52
GTR strict Skyline 15039,488 0,332 −7270,0426 0,5651 15,8019 249,7016 −7269,396 9,94E-05 63,54
TN strict Skyline 15045,206 0,288 −7269,9677 0,6691 15,8945 252,6351 −7269,3376 9,94E-05 63,34
GTR strict Exponential 15054,932 0,712 −7271,8802 0,567 15,987 255,5857 −7271,359 1,04E-04 60,39
HKY strict Skyline 15061,671 0,235 −7271,2307 0,6204 16,1123 259,6046 −7270,5718 9,95E-05 63,30
HKY strict Exponential 15103,558 0,373 −7274,2334 0,6181 16,6597 277,5455 −7273,6851 1,05E-04 60,23
GTR strict Constant 15176,989 0,259 −7294,2041 0,6241 17,1549 294,2903 −7293,6689 1,10E-04 75,21
GTR lognormal Skyline 15185,484 0,641 −7225,1862 0,5852 19,1717 367,5557 −7224,637 1,03E-04 59,93
HKY strict Constant 15185,713 0,302 −7296,122 0,6673 17,226 296,7344 −7295,705 1,11E-04 74,40
HKY lognormal Constant 15220,783 1,064 −7236,6342 0,7068 19,3328 373,7575 −7236,3062 1,36E-04 82,95
GTR lognormal Constant 15228,07 0,813 −7234,22 0,7667 19,4888 379,8152 −7233,8009 1,35E-04 83,79
GTR lognormal Exponent 15241,128 0,687 −7231,7305 0,6177 19,7189 388,8334 −7231,0663 1,10E-04 57,65
TN lognormal Constant 15243,848 0,787 −7233,4719 0,8295 19,7092 388,4522 −7233,0142 1,36E-04 83,58
HKY lognormal Exponential 15259,512 0,698 −7234,0025 0,7269 19,8935 395,7533 −7233,4183 1,16E-04 57,51
HKY lognormal Skyline 15274,597 0,836 −7227,9411 0,7945 20,2326 409,3574 −7227,2017 1,08E-04 60,17
JC strict Skyline 15568,929 0,213 −7564,2075 0,4269 14,841 220,2563 −7563,808 1,00E-04 63,12
JC lognormal Constant 15776,125 0,513 −7529,0754 0,6939 18,9469 358,9868 −7528,7064 1,33E-04 83,02
HKY exponential Exponential 20933,113 0,456 −10156,8428 0,3262 17,5986 309,7125 −10156,4941 1,32E-02 38,04
HKY exponential Skyline 20992,627 0,725 −10155,6312 0,6637 18,4576 340,6823 −10155,5158 1,34E-02 38,01
GTR exponential Skyline 21011,845 0,809 −10195,5903 0,3443 17,6163 310,3323 −10195,2899 1,41E-02 38,01
HKY exponential Constant 21078,474 0,966 −10216,2308 0,5423 17,9724 323,006 −10216,1617 1,55E-02 38,01
GTR exponential Constant 21583,068 1,086 −10292,0014 1,3058 22,3502 499,5326 −10293,6091 1,48E-02 38,01

The MCA tree showed that the five novel Croatian sequences belonged to subtype CPV2c (Fig. 2). HR442, HR774 and HR793 had the highest phylogenetic relationship with one Uruguayan sequence (KM457125) isolated from a dog and a North American sequence (KJ813846) isolated from a bobcat (Lynx rufus) and which is also in the same clade with French, Italian and other Uruguayan sequences. HR859 appeared to be a direct ancestor of Italian sequence (FJ005205) and in the same clade with French, North American and other Argentinian sequences. HR856 had, according to the tree topology, the same ancestor as the North American sequences (KJ813843) isolated from Bobcat and is in the same clade with Argentinian, Italian, French and Uruguayan sequences. According to this tree TMCRA of all the analyzed sequences was estimated to 57 y ago, while for CPV2a, b and c it was 39 y ago. Interestingly, some clades were specific but not exclusive to some species. In the MEV clade, a monkey isolate was also identified. In the clade with mostly from raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) sequences we have also identified some early dog infection sequences and sequences mostly of vaccine origin. In the CPV2abc clade, virus isolates were mostly isolated from dog but also from puma (Puma concolor), coyote (Canis latrans), bobcat, grey wolf (Canis lupus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), fisher (Pekania pennant), cat (Felis silvestra), red panda (Ailurus fulgens) and mink (Neovision vison). In the FPV clade, sequences were also from many different species including grey wolf, fisher, raccoon, bobcat and red fox (Vulpes Vulpes). The Tree topology suggested a phylogenetic relationship but, in most of the cases, the posterior probability value was too low (PP < 0.95) to support diversifications. Only three clear branches were well supported by posterior probability: “old” CPV clade, MEV clade and FPV clade. Negative purifying selection pressure was identified in 23 codon positions. Synonymous mutations were observed mostly in vaccine strains and strains isolated from wild animals.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MCA tree revealed phylogenetic relationship of Croatian VP2 sequences. Sequences data are provided in taxa name. Each subtype/clade was colored differently; CPV2a dark blue, CPV2b blue, CPV2c light blue, FPV brown, MEV grey-green, yellow vaccine and red Croatian sequences. Red taxa name represent sequences originated from Felides: cat (Felis catus), bobcat (Lynx rufus), puma (Puma concolor) and leopard (Pantera pardus); blue taxa from Mustelides: Fisher (Pekania pennant) and Mink (Neovision vision) and green from other Canides, coyote (Canis latrans), grey wolf (Canis lupus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), raccoon (Procytor lotor), raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and violet taxa from monkey. Scale length represents years.

Bayesian skyplot analysis showed that historical population size experienced significant growth bursts between 1973 and 1982 and again between 1998 and 2001 (Fig. 3). Since 2005 population size started to decline to reach an apparent steady-state from 2009. All five Croatian isolates had specific amino acid mutations M87L, L101I which is under episodic diversifying positive selection, A300G which is under episodic pervasive positive selection. D305Y39 which are present in CPV2a while A297S, which is typical for new variants 2a and 2b, was not observed27,40. It is notable that Q297S that is typical for South East Asia and F267Y, Y324I, T440A which is under episodic pervasive and diversifying positive selection) that are responsible for vaccine failures were not identified in any of the Croatian isolates29,32. In contrast HR856 harboured the specific mutation Q7H that is unique at this position together with G496A. While G496 of HR856 sequence is replaced with an A (mutation in second position of the codon) in raccoon it is replaced with a S (mutation in the first position of the codon). Croatian sequences had N426E which is under episodic diversifying positive selection that is typical for CPV2c4144. Besides Croatian sequences, N426E was also observed in Italian, French, German, Argentinian and Australian isolated from dog and from North American sequences (Idaho, Montana and Colorado) isolated from dog, puma, bobcat and coyote. N426D was an amino acid mutation of interest since it resulted in the discrimination between CPV and CPV2a, CPV2b and was also associated with the binding affinity to the feline transferrin receptor as well as being involved in the replication of the virus in cats6,20,45. The third variant N426E was critical to help distinguish between CPV2a, CPV2b and CPV2c strains, but is obvious that CPV2c strains are able to replicate in felines too. Mutations at amino acid residue 324 may have had an impact on parvovirus host range46. Selection pressure analysis further revealed that 97 codons are under negative selection pressure or 99,203% sites while only 0,797% sites where under diversifying selection (Supplementary information Mixed Effects Model of Evolution, Fixed Effects Liklihood, Single-Likelihood Ancestor Counting, A Fast, Unconstrained Bayesian AppRoximation for Inferring Selection, Brench-Site Unrestricted Statistical Test for Episodic Diversification, The adaptive Branch-Site Random Effects Likelihood method, Detect relaxed selection in codon-based phylogenetic framework).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Skyplot to reconstruct historical population size. Axis values presents effective population size; scale length represents years; blue area is confidential interval.

Histopathology and in situ detection of CPV2 in organs

The histopathologic lesions observed in the sections after H&E staining were necrotic and hemorrhagic enteritis of the small intestine, with dilated crypts often associated with the regeneration of epithelium (Fig. 4A). Shortened and fused intestinal villi, lymphoid depletion in the lymph nodes, spleen and tonsils were noticed. In the spleen, macrophages with golden-brown pigment were often observed except in one sample where foci of necrosis were seen. In liver samples, lymphocytic hepatitis with strong blood congestion, perivascular lymphocytic cuffing and weak infiltration inside sinusoidal vessels were also observed. In bone marrow, aplastic pancytopenia was present. Mild intramuscular bleedings and myofibrillar degeneration were present in myocardium. Interstitial pneumonia with proliferation of pneumocytes type 2 and strong congestions were observed in lungs whereas in pancreas congestion was hardly noticeable. Epithelial cells in tubules of the kidney cortex were affected by vacuolar degeneration. Apoptosis of astrocytes in brain and cerebellum were noticed besides micro gliosis (Fig. 4D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Ileum with strong staining of CPV2 in submucosa and crypts; (B) Lymph nodes, bold arrow marks positive monocyte, white arrow marks lymphocyte; (C) Bone marrow, bold arrow marks positive megakaryocyte, white arrow marks lymphoblast; (D) Spleen, positive monocytes and lymphocytes. IS PCR for the detection of CPV2, NBT chromogen and counterstained with Fast Green.

CPV2 was readily detected using in situ PCR (IS PCR) in a wide range of organs (Figs 46). Eighteen amplification cycles were sufficient to detect the virus in ileum (Fig. 4A), colon, pancreas, liver (Fig. 5A), ovaries (Fig. 6A,B), lymph node (Fig. 4B), tonsils, pancreas, spleen (Fig. 4D), bone marrow (Fig. 4C) and lung (Fig. 5D) whereas thymus, heart, brain, cerebellum and kidney were negative. Strong positive signals were noticed when the amplification cycle number was raised to 30 for samples from brain, cerebellum (Fig. 5D) and kidney (Fig. 5C) whereas myocardium remained negative. In the ileum, intense staining was observed in submucosal inflammatory cells, goblet cells and enterocytes (Fig. 4A), in both cytoplasm and nuclei. In some strong infections, CPV2 genome was also identified in tunica muscularis and more specifically in aggregates around blood vessels. In some cases, staining was so intense that it was not possible to discriminate which cells in the mucosa or the submucosa were indeed infected. CPV2 was detected in the epithelium lining the gastric pits but not in glands. In contrast, staining was randomly observed in a few cells in the submucosa of the colon. Besides the ileum, a strong CPV2 signal was noticed in mesenteric lymph nodes (Fig. 4B) as well as in monocytes and lymphocytes of the spleen (Fig. 4D). Megakaryocytes and lymphoblasts harbored positive signal in bone marrow (Fig. 4C). Kupffer cells in the liver showed intense CPV2 signal (Fig. 5A) and nearby hepatocytes, and infected cells were aggregated around blood vessels. In lungs, lymphocytes and alveolar macrophages appeared to be the only infected cells (Fig. 5D). Kidneys were negative for CPV2 presence except for one clinical sample where the positive staining was found in glomerular cells (Fig. 5C). Further positive signals were observed in neurons and glia cells of the brain (Fig. 5D) as well as in macrophages in corpus luteum of ovaries (Fig. 5A) and in cells of membrana granulosa in Graafian follicle (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) Corpus luteum, bold arrow mark macrophages; (B) Graafian follicle, bold arrow marks granulosa cells. IS PCR for the detection of CPV2, NBT chromogen and counterstaining with Fast Green; (C) Ileum with low amount of CPV2 antigen, ABC chromogen and counterstaining with Heamtoxylin, 200x; (D) Lymph node with low amount of CPV2 antigen is noticeable in a follicle, IHC to detect CPV2, ABC chromogen and counterstained with Heamtoxylin, 400x.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Liver, bold arrow marks positive Kupffer cell; (B) lungs, bold arrow marks alveolar macrophage; (C) kidney, positive glomerular cell; (D) Cerebellum, bold arrows marks neurons and white arrow marks glia cells. IS PCR for the detection of CPV2, NBT chromogen, counterstained with Fast Green.

Samples that showed strong positive signals by IS PCR for the presence of CPV2 nucleic acid were submitted for the detection of CPV2 antigen using immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Fig. 6C,D). In four animals IS PCR detected a strong signal in a wide range of organs while IHC barely detected a weak signal for CPV2 antigen just in lymph nodes and intestines in two animals out of four. All other organs and animals remained negative by IHC. Based on the intensity and the distribution of the signal, abundant DNA or phagocytosed virions were highlighted in Kupffer cells in liver, megakaryocytes in bone marrow, monocytes, alveolar macrophages, macrophages in corpus luteum and neurons.

Discussion

This report describes the exploitation of complementary approaches including phylogenetic analysis, amino acid analysis, Bayesian skyplot, recombination and selection pressure test. IS PCR and IHC was used to confirm the presence of CPV2 in all the submitted clinical samples that we have investigated. In this study, we have analysed one gene locus, VP2, to acquire a snapshot of “Carnivore” Parvovirus evolution. Our analysis indicated that TMCRA sequence was dated 57 y ago (95% HPD 42–74 y) which would suggest that around 1960 (1943–1975) FPV, MEV and CPV started to diversify. CPV2 started to branch from FPV 43 y ago, around 1978 which coincides with the first outbreak of CPV2 in the same year. Our observation with Skyplot may suggest that an occurrence of each new genogroup resulted in population size expansion while the use of new vaccine resulted in population size decrease. The expansion shift in Skyplot was visible around 1978 when the disease was reported as significant, and which was subsequently followed by a large one with the occurrence of CPV2c. In contrast, the implementation of an effective vaccine in 198147,48 may have led to a stabilization of the viral population. The first strain of CPV was replaced by CPV-2a globally during 1979 and 1980, which represents the common ancestor of all the CPVs currently circulating in dogs world3,49. Clade FPV-CPV2a-c (Fig. 2) is supported by statistically significant PP 0,941 (Supplementary information Posterior probability tree) and this evolutionary analysis confirms that CPV2a-c has evolved from FPV. But, advanced Bayesian MCMC as a very strong phylogeny tool reveals that CPV and CPV2a-c do not have the same close TMCRA (Fig. 2), CPV2 evolved together with MEV (PP is 0,4666, too low to be statistically significant therefore branching between MEV and CPV is unconfident) and not FPV. These results are interesting since they strongly suggest that the evolution of VP2 of CPV and CPV2a-c are two independent events. This important observation may explain one of the major biological differences between CPV2 and CPV2a which is the ability of the latter to infect cats in vitro50,51. Our analysis seems to indicate that, based on the VP2 region we have analysed, CPV2, FPV, MEV may potentially be one transspecies virus which can infect the Order Carnivore. Although our phylogenetic results of the Croatian strains showed close relationship with isolates that originated from the North and South America in neither case was the tree topology supported by robust statistically significant posterior probability. All Croatian strains had codons under positive selection which means that those strains have some desirable traits. Those strains have some positive traits which offer them advantage, better chance for survival. Mutations of codons (amino acids) in Croatian strains are at the antibody footprint on the surface of CPV223. Immune response means selection pressure is as evolution engine. An amino acid change is able to alter the structure of antibody binding site on the surface even if this mutation is not affecting directly the antibody binding site. The effect of the alterations on the immunoglobulin binding cannot be excluded.

Selection analysis is in consistence with skyplot, that CVP2 population was in last period stabile, not significant intensification or relaxation of selection trend in population.

In this study, we have exploited IS PCR for the detection of CPV2. Our data suggest IS PCR method is more sensitive than IHC without compromising on the specificity of the detection of CPV2 and could represent a versatile method that could greatly enhance pathology analysis. We were able to consistently identify the presence of CPV2 in glial cells and ovaries. Glial cell proliferation was associated with neuronophagia (degenerative or dead neuron was engulfed by microgliocytes) as previously reported52. This finding contrasts greatly with the current knowledge indicating that CPV2 has only a tropism for highly mitotically active tissues, whereas neurons do not replicate and originate from stem cells28. In contrast, glial cells are capable of mitosis. Astrocytes are star-shaped glial cells that have also been observed to turn into neurons by virtue of the pluripotency of the stem cell. IS PCR revealed that CPV2 was present in both, glia cells and neurons; with perhaps glial cells apparently being more predominantly infected than neurons. CPV2 was also identified in macrophages in corpus lutea and in Graafian follicles. This observation is consistent with the known tropism of CPV2 for the monocyte/macrophage cell lineage. Corpus luteum is a special type of cicatrix, and during the process of healing, the granulomatous tissue is gradually replacing ovulating Graafian follicles and - as a consequence - it is expected to be populated with macrophages. Membrana granulosa is consisting of granulosa cells which are somatic cells and are mitotically active.

Conclusion

An important finding of this work is that CPV2c isolates circulate in Croatia. Our analysis indicated that TMCRA sequence was dated 57 y ago which would coincide with the first MEV outbreak in Canada. CPV2a-c started to branch from FPV just around the first outbreak of CPV2 which seems to have an evolutionary history related to MEV. In each clade a wide range of different species of the Order Carnivorae were observed which indicate that Protoparvoviruses may potentially be one transspecies virus which can occasionally infect the Order Carnivore. Phylogenetic results of the Croatian strains showed close relationships with isolates that originated from the North and South of America, Italy and France. Historical population size experienced significant growth bursts between 1973 and 1982 and again between 1998 and 2001, Since 2005 population size started to decline to reach an apparent steady-state from 2009. Croatian isolates had specific and some unique amino acid mutations under positive selection. The effect of the alterations on the immunoglobulin binding cannot be excluded.

Finally, in this study, we implemented a highly sensitive in situ method to discover the presence of CPV2 in cell types and organs such as glial cells and ovaries. Further work is required to confirm if this novel observation is indeed associated to the CPV2c variant only.

Material and Methods

Ethical statement

In this study, the tissue samples that were analysed originated exclusively from dead animal cases caused by natural infection that were routinely submitted for necropsy to the Department of Pathology at the Croatian Veterinary Institute. Therefore, no institutional or licensing committee approval was needed since necropsy and tissue sampling is a common practice in pathology laboratories.

Samples

In 2014, 7 dogs and 4 puppies (3, 4, 6 and 6 weeks old) were submitted to the Croatian Veterinary Institute for necropsy. These animals harbored pathological lesions typically associated with canine parvovirosis. Two animals were bitches originating from kennels where an outbreak of hemorrhagic enteritis occurred causing high mortality rates. While all bitches were routinely vaccinated most of their puppies died by the age of 1 month. Five dogs that originated from shelters received one shot of vaccine whereas the dog that was privately owned was regularly vaccinated against CPV2. From 2 litters, unrelated to the examined bitches, which died from hemorrhagic diarrhea, altogether 4 puppies were submitted for necropsy. Puppies were vaccinated twice, with a polyvalent vaccine, while all other animals were vaccinated several times according to standard prophylaxic measures and manufactures recommendations. The polyvalent vaccine included Canine parvovirus, Canine distemper, Canine adenovirus type 2, Canine parainfluenza virus, two serovariants of Leptospira canicola and icteroheamorrhagiae. All samples are geographically un-related and originated from city of Zagreb, middle and northern Croatia and from Dalmatia region. During the post-mortem examinations of the first six animals a tissue set was obtained for histopathological examinations, including ileum, mesenterial lymph node, spleen, liver, whereas in five other animals brain, heart, lung, kidney, pancreas, tonsils, thymus, bone marrow, submandibular, praescapular and inguinal lymph nodes, uterus and ovaries were also sampled. All tissue specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde solution at room temperature for 2 days, dehydrated through different grades of ethanol and in xylene and embedded in paraffin. 3–4 µm tissues and mounted on Super Frost glass slides (Thermo Scientific). Subsequently they were routinely stained with the standard technique of Hematoxylin and Eosin and examined under light microscope. Sampled parts of organs of ileum, spleen and lymph nodes were stored at −18 °C.

Classical PCR and phylogenetic analysis

To assess the background level of CPV2 infected sections, pooled parts of ileum, lymph node and spleen were submitted to PCR, and the VP2 encoding sequence was determined according to a protocol described previously11. The five Croatian sequences were aligned with the following reference sequences (GenBank accession numbers): CPV2a (M74849)53, CPV2b (M24003)6, CPV2c (FJ222821)25,54, newCPV2a (EU213073); and newCPV2b (AB054218)55 and CPV, Feline parvovirsu (FPV) and MEV altogether 356 sequences, selected using BlastTool to find most simmilar and dissimilar sequences to Croatian sequences randomly, and also known sequences from neigbor countries. Taxa name is consist of folowing informations: “Country of origin_Gene accsess number/subtype/host/strain data/strain data_year of isolation”. If host species is not menthion in taxa name then the host is dog or in case of MEV then the host is mink. Subtype was added if the appropriate metadata was present in the Genbank entry for a specific sequence. Sequences were aligned using the ClustalW program in MEGA 6 software56 to generate.nexus file and to perform amino acid sequence analysis. Prior to the phylogenetic analyses the dataset as checked for evidence of possible recombination events using a Single Breakpoint Recombination test implemented in HyPhy software57. Bayesian pylogeny was calculate using BEAST software package BEAST v2.4.8 and BEAST v1.4.3. Program was run with Markov Chain Monte Carlo length until Efective sample size values were over 200 for Likelihood, Posterior, Prior and Timeclock. Calculation were performed using different substitution models: Generalise times reversible (GTR)58, Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano (HKY)59, Jukes-Cantor 69 (JC69)60,61 and Tamura-Nei (TN93)62 including 2 codon models SRD0663 and YANG9664 where using strict molecular clock and relaxed lognormal and exponential molecular clock65; and different population size prior: Coalescent Constant, Coalescent Exponential and Coalescent Bayesian Skyline model. To compare different phylogenetic models BEAST log files were analyzed in Tracer v1.6 to calculate AICM parametar and which model better fits38,66. Selected tree file was compiled in TreeAnnotator v2.4.7 from BEAST package and te Most common ancestor (MCA) tree was constructed in FigTree v1.4.367. Amino acid sequence analyisis was perfromed using MEGA 6 software. To investigate population history bayesian skyplot was calculated in Tracer v1.6.0 software68. To evaluate selection presure we used Fixed Effects Liklihood (FEL)69, A Fast, Unconstrained Bayesian AppRoximation for Inferring Selection (FUBAR)70, Detect Individual Sites Subject to Episodic Diversifying Selection - Mixed Effects Model of Evolution (MEME)71, Single-Likelihood Ancestor Counting (SLAC)69, Brench-Site Unrestricted Statistical Test for Episodic Diversification (BUSTED)72, Detect relaxed selection in codon-based phylogenetic framework (RELAX)73 and An adaptive branch-site REL test for episodic diversification The adaptive Branch-Site Random Effects Likelihood method (aBSREL)74,75 implemented in HyPhy software57 where p < 0.1 as a default value to detect selection pressuer and p < 0.05 were considered as statisticaly significant.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical labeling of CPV2 antigen was performed with anti-CPV2 mouse monoclonal antibody (Mab) (A3B10, VMRD, Pullman, USA). After dewaxing of sections, antigen retrieval was performed with 0.1% protease XIV solution (Sigma Aldrich Co.) at 37 °C for 10 min. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% H202 solution for 10 min and non-specific immune reactions were blocked with incubation of 2% solution of skimmed milk powder for 20 minutes. The sections were incubated with the primary antibody at a dilution of 1:300 overnight at 4 °C. Reaction was visualized using anti-mouse secondary antibody (DAKO EnVisionTM + HRP Mouse Kit, K4001) and AEC chromogen (DAKO AEC + substrate-chromogen system K3469) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The slides were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and mounted with glycerol-gelatine. As a negative control, an additional section was incubated in a similar manner with PBS. As a positive control organ from a dog that died from parvovirus enteritis were used.

In situ PCR

Direct in situ (IS) PCR was performed as previously described7681 with some modifications. For IS PCR specific primers was applied to amplify a long sequence 681 bp product as was described previously6,21,82 and were further adjust for IS PCR7781, activation step 5 min at 95 °C, annealing 2 min at 56 °C, elongation 2 min at 72 °C, denaturation 45 s at 95 °C and final elongation 7 min at 72 °C. In the first trail, all organs were performed with just 18 cycles for amplification. In a subsequent trial, all negative slides were repeated using 30 cycles for amplification. To exclude unspecific primer amplification, positive samples were repeatedly tested with only forward or reverse primer. As a negative control ileum and lymph nodes obtained from a dog that was negative for the presence of CPV2 by classic PCR were used.

Supplementary information

41598_2019_53422_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (98.4KB, pdf)

Recombination test using Single break point analysis

Fixed Effects Liklihood (95.8KB, pdf)
41598_2019_53422_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (55.4KB, pdf)

A Fast, Unconstrained Bayesian AppRoximation for Inferring Selection

41598_2019_53422_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (573.8KB, pdf)

Brench-Site Unrestricted Statistical Test for Episodic Diversification

41598_2019_53422_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (129.5KB, pdf)

The adaptive Branch-Site Random Effects Likelihood method

41598_2019_53422_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (66.6KB, pdf)

Detect relaxed selection in codon-based phylogenetic framework

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for support from the KTIA_AIK_12-1-2012-0012, “MendTheGap” H2020-TWINN-2015 No 692249 and “MitoTAUROmics” HRZZ IP-11-2013-9070. T.A.A. was supported by UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBRSC) Institute Strategic Programme Grants (BBS/E/D/20002173). Gy. Balka was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. We are very grateful to professor Alan Archibald for proofreading and suggestions. Publication was supported by the OpenAccess Publication Fund of the University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture.

Author contributions

D.N. drafted and wrote the manuscript, performed necropsy, histopathology, IS PCR and sequence analysis; A.J. review manuscript and analyze results; I.L. review manuscript and contribute in sequence analysis; Z.A.R. assist during case selection and drafted manuscript; A.C. perform PCR and sequencing, drafted and review manuscript and analyzed the data; L.S. and G.B. performed IHC and review manuscript; T.T. and T.A.-A. contributed to conception and design and wrote manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Tamas Tuboly is deceased.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-53422-9.

References

  • 1.Harrison LR, Styer EL, Pursell AR, Carmichael LE, Nietfeld JC. Fatal disease in nursing puppies associated with minute virus of canines. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 1992;4:19–22. doi: 10.1177/104063879200400105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kerr, J. R., Cotomore, S. F., Bloom, M. E., Linden, R. M. & Parrish, C. R. Parvoviruses. (Hodder Education Publishers, 2006).
  • 3.Hoelzer K, Shackelton LA, Parrish CR, Holmes EC. Phylogenetic analysis reveals the emergence, evolution and dispersal of carnivore parvoviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2008;89:2280–2289. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/002055-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kelly WR. An enteric disease of dogs resembling feline panleukopenia. Aust. Vet. J. 1978;534:593. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1978.tb02426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parrish CR, O’Connell PH, Evermann JF, Carmichael LE. Natural variation of canine parvovirus. Science. 1985;230:1046–1048. doi: 10.1126/science.4059921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parrish CR. Mapping specific functions in the capsid structure of canine parvovirus and feline panleukopenia virus using infectious plasmid clones. Virology. 1991;183:195–205. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90132-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Truyen U, Parrish CR, Harder TC, Kaaden O-R. There is nothing permanent except change. The emergence of new virus diseases. Vet. Microbiol. 1995;43:103–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)92531-F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Truyen U. Emergence and recent evolution of canine parvovirus. Vet. Microbiol. 1999;69:47–50. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00086-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buonavoglia D, et al. Antigenic analysis of canine parvovirus strains isolated in Italy. New Microbiol. 2000;23:93–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Decaro N, et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Canine Parvovirus, Europe. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2007;13:1222–1224. doi: 10.3201/eid1308.070505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cságola A, Varga S, L\Horincz M, Tuboly T. Analysis of the full-length VP2 protein of canine parvoviruses circulating in Hungary. Arch. Virol. 2014;159:2441–2444. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Agbandje M, McKenna R, Rossmann MG, Strassheim ML, Parrish CR. Structure determination of feline panleukopenia virus empty particles. Proteins. 1993;16:155–171. doi: 10.1002/prot.340160204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chang SF, Sgro JY, Parrish CR. Multiple amino acids in the capsid structure of canine parvovirus coordinately determine the canine host range and specific antigenic and hemagglutination properties. J. Virol. 1992;66:6858–6867. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.12.6858-6867.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parker JS, Parrish CR. Canine parvovirus host range is determined by the specific conformation of an additional region of the capsid. J. Virol. 1997;71:9214–9222. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.12.9214-9222.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hueffer K, et al. The natural host range shift and subsequent evolution of canine parvovirus resulted from virus-specific binding to the canine transferrin receptor. J. Virol. 2003;77:1718–1726. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.3.1718-1726.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palermo LM, Hafenstein SL, Parrish CR. Purified feline and canine transferrin receptors reveal complex interactions with the capsids of canine and feline parvoviruses that correspond to their host ranges. J. Virol. 2006;80:8482–8492. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00683-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parker JS, Murphy WJ, Wang D, O’Brien SJ, Parrish CR. Canine and feline parvoviruses can use human or feline transferrin receptors to bind, enter, and infect cells. J. Virol. 2001;75:3896–3902. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.8.3896-3902.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Allison AB, et al. Role of multiple hosts in the cross-species transmission and emergence of a pandemic parvovirus. J. Virol. 2012;86:865–872. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06187-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stucker KM, et al. The Role of Evolutionary Intermediates in the Host Adaptation of Canine Parvovirus. J. Virol. 2012;86:1514–1521. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06222-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Parrish CR, et al. Rapid antigenic-type replacement and DNA sequence evolution of canine parvovirus. J. Virol. 1991;65:6544–6552. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.12.6544-6552.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buonavoglia C, et al. Evidence for evolution of canine parvovirus type 2 in Italy. J. Gen. Virol. 2001;82:3021–3025. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-82-12-3021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Organtini LJ, Allison AB, Lukk T, Parrish CR, Hafenstein S. Global Displacement of Canine Parvovirus by a Host-Adapted Variant: Structural Comparison between Pandemic Viruses with Distinct Host Ranges. J. Virol. 2015;89:1909–1912. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02611-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hafenstein S, et al. Structural Comparison of Different Antibodies Interacting with Parvovirus Capsids. J. Virol. 2009;83:5556–5566. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02532-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Decaro N, et al. Evidence for immunisation failure in vaccinated adult dogs infected with canine parvovirus type 2c. New Microbiol. 2008;31:125–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Decaro N, et al. Severe parvovirus in a 12-year-old dog that had been repeatedly vaccinated. Vet. Rec. 2009;164:593–595. doi: 10.1136/vr.164.19.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Decaro N, et al. Canine parvovirus type 2c infection in a kitten associated with intracranial abscess and convulsions. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2011;13:231–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Truyen U. Evolution of canine parvovirus—A need for new vaccines? Vet. Microbiol. 2006;117:9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pollock RV. Experimental canine parvovirus infection in dogs. Cornell Vet. 1982;72:103–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Decaro N, et al. Clinical and virological findings in pups naturally infected by canine parvovirus type 2 Glu-426 mutant. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2005;17:133–138. doi: 10.1177/104063870501700206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Elia G, et al. Antibody levels and protection to canine parvovirus type 2. J. Vet. Med. B. Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health. 2005;52:320–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carman PS, Povey RC. Pathogenesis of canine parvovirus-2 in dogs: histopathology and antigen identification in tissues. Res. Vet. Sci. 1985;38:141–150. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31817-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jones, T. C., Abbot, J. R. & Han, S. Veterinary Pathology (1997).
  • 33.Decaro N, et al. Evaluation of lactogenic immunity to canine parvovirus in pups. New Microbiol. 2004;27:375–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Decaro N, et al. Maternally-derived antibodies in pups and protection from canine parvovirus infection. Biologicals. 2005;33:261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schultz RD. Duration of immunity for canine and feline vaccines: A review. Vet. Microbiol. 2006;117:75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schultz RD, Thiel B, Mukhtar E, Sharp P, Larson LJ. Age and Long-term Protective Immunity in Dogs and Cats. J. Comp. Pathol. 2010;142:S102–S108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Decaro N, et al. Occurrence of severe gastroenteritis in pups after canine parvovirus vaccine administration: a clinical and laboratory diagnostic dilemma. Vaccine. 2007;25:1161–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Raftery AE, Niu X, Hoff PD, Yeung KY. Fast Inference for the Latent Space Network Model Using a Case-Control Approximate Likelihood. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 2012;21:901–919. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2012.679240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pérez R, et al. Recent spreading of a divergent canine parvovirus type 2a (CPV-2a) strain in a CPV-2c homogenous population. Vet. Microbiol. 2012;155:214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ohshima T, et al. Chronological analysis of canine parvovirus type 2 isolates in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2008;70:769–775. doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jeoung S-Y, Ahn S-J, Kim D. Genetic analysis of VP2 gene of canine parvovirus isolates in Korea. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2008;70:719–722. doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin C-N, et al. Genetic characterization of type 2a canine parvoviruses from Taiwan reveals the emergence of an Ile324 mutation in VP2. Virol. J. 2014;11:39. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-11-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Geng Y, et al. Co-Circulation of the Rare CPV-2c with Unique Gln370Arg Substitution, New CPV-2b with Unique Thr440Ala Substitution, and New CPV-2a with High Prevalence and Variation in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Han S-C, et al. Full-length genomic characterizations of two canine parvoviruses prevalent in Northwest China. Arch. Microbiol. 2015;197:621–626. doi: 10.1007/s00203-015-1093-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Truyen U, et al. Evolution of the feline-subgroup parvoviruses and the control of canine host range in vivo. J. Virol. 1995;69:4702–4710. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.8.4702-4710.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nookala M, et al. Full-length VP2 gene analysis of canine parvovirus reveals emergence of newer variants in India. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2016;63:411–426. doi: 10.1556/030.63.2016.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Carmichael, L. E. Canine Viral Vaccines at a Turning Point - A personal Perspective. In Veterinary Vaccines and Diagnostics (eds Dodds, W. & Schultz, R. D.) 1–815 (Academic Press, 1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Carmichael LE, Joubert JC, Pollock RV. A modified live canine parvovirus vaccine. II. Immune response. Cornell Vet. 1983;73:13–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Parrish CR, et al. The Global Spread and Replacement of Canine Parvovirus Strains. J. Gen. Virol. 1988;69:1111–1116. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-69-5-1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Truyen U, Agbandje M, Parrish CR. Characterization of the Feline Host Range and a Specific Epitope of Feline Panleukopenia Virus. Virology. 1994;200:494–503. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Truyen U, Parrish CR. Canine and feline host ranges of canine parvovirus and feline panleukopenia virus: distinct host cell tropisms of each virus in vitro and in vivo. J. Virol. 1992;66:5399–5408. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.9.5399-5408.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhao Y, Lin Y, Zeng X, Lu C, Hou J. Genotyping and pathobiologic characterization of canine parvovirus circulating in Nanjing, China. Virol. J. 2013;10:272. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-10-272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Parrish CR, Aquadro CF, Carmichael LE. Canine host range and a specific epitope map along with variant sequences in the capsid protein gene of canine parvovirus and related feline, mink, and raccoon parvoviruses. Virology. 1988;166:293–307. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90500-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Decaro N, et al. Genetic analysis of canine parvovirus type 2c. Virology. 2009;385:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ikeda Y, et al. Predominance of Canine Parvovirus (CPV) in Unvaccinated Cat Populations and Emergence of New Antigenic Types of CPVs in Cats. Virology. 2000;278:13–19. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tamura K, et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pond SLK, Frost SDW, Muse SV. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:676–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 1984;20:86–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02101990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1985;22:160–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02101694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jukes TH, Cantor CR. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of bases substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1969;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993;10:512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shapiro B, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding sequences. Molecular biology and evolution. 2006;23:7–9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rannala B, Yang Z. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 1996;43:304–311. doi: 10.1007/BF02338839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e88. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Baele G, et al. Improving the Accuracy of Demographic and Molecular Clock Model Comparison While Accommodating Phylogenetic Uncertainty. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:2157–2167. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:1969–1973. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, Pybus OG. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005;22:1185–1192. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kosakovsky Pond SL, Frost SDW. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005;22:1208–1222. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Murrell B, et al. FUBAR: A Fast, Unconstrained Bayesian AppRoximation for Inferring Selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:1196–1205. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Murrell B, et al. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Murrell B, et al. Gene-wide identification of episodic selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:1365–1371. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wertheim JO, Murrell B, Smith MD, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Scheffler K. RELAX: Detecting Relaxed Selection in a Phylogenetic Framework. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:820–832. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Smith MD, et al. Less Is More: An Adaptive Branch-Site Random Effects Model for Efficient Detection of Episodic Diversifying Selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:1342–1353. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kosakovsky Pond SL, et al. A Random Effects Branch-Site Model for Detecting Episodic Diversifying Selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:3033–3043. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nuovo GJ. In situ PCR: protocols and applications. PCR Methods Appl. 1995;4:S151–67. doi: 10.1101/gr.4.4.S151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nuovo GJ. Co-labeling using in situ PCR: a review. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2001;49:1329–1339. doi: 10.1177/002215540104901101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ocadiz-Delgado R, Castaneda-Saucedo E, Indra AK, Hernandez-Pando R, Gariglio P. Impaired cervical homeostasis upon selective ablation of RXRalpha in epithelial cells. Genesis. 2008;46:19–28. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ocadiz-Delgado R, et al. Induction of focal epithelial hyperplasia in tongue of young bk6-E6/E7 HPV16 transgenic mice. Transgenic Res. 2009;18:513–527. doi: 10.1007/s11248-009-9243-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ocadiz-Delgado R, et al. RXRα deletion and E6E7 oncogene expression are sufficient to induce cervical malignant lesions in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2012;317:226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Novosel D, et al. Investigating porcine parvoviruses genogroup 2 infection using in situ polymerase chain reaction. BMC Vet. Res. 2018;14:163. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1487-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Reed AP, Jones EV, Miller TJ. Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of canine parvovirus. J. Virol. 1988;62:266–276. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.1.266-276.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41598_2019_53422_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (98.4KB, pdf)

Recombination test using Single break point analysis

Fixed Effects Liklihood (95.8KB, pdf)
41598_2019_53422_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (55.4KB, pdf)

A Fast, Unconstrained Bayesian AppRoximation for Inferring Selection

41598_2019_53422_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (573.8KB, pdf)

Brench-Site Unrestricted Statistical Test for Episodic Diversification

41598_2019_53422_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (129.5KB, pdf)

The adaptive Branch-Site Random Effects Likelihood method

41598_2019_53422_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (66.6KB, pdf)

Detect relaxed selection in codon-based phylogenetic framework


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES