Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Oct 29;27:104726. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104726

Data of soil, vegetation and bird species found on double-crested cormorant colonies in the southeastern United States

Leah Moran Veum a,, Brian S Dorr b, Katie Hanson-Dorr b, RJ Moore c, Scott A Rush a
PMCID: PMC6859226  PMID: 31763391

Abstract

This data article provides the methods and procedures followed to collect and analyse soil, vegetation and bird data on three different treatment islands in Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama. Samples were collected from randomly selected plot points from islands that were placed into three different treatment types: Colony (currently occupied by Double-crested Cormorants) (Phalacrocorax auritus; n = 5), Historic (historically occupied by cormorants and currently abandoned; n = 3) and Reference (never occupied by cormorants; n = 4). We compared vegetation and tree metrics such as structure and diversity, as well as soil chemistry and bird diversity and communities among islands within Guntersville Reservoir. These data document for the first time that we are aware of the long-term effects of soil chemistry changes, vegetation changes, and impacts to avian diversity, in temperate forest ecosystems, by cormorant colonies. All data is associated with the recent article by Veum et al. [1] and provided here as raw data.

Keywords: Waterbird, Southeastern forest, Diversity, Avian, Vegetation, Soil


Specifications Table

Subject Environmental Science (General)
Specific subject area Effects of nesting Double-crested Cormorants on soils, and plant and avian communities on insular habitats
Type of data Table
Figure
How data were acquired Random soil Sampling
Random Vegetation plot sampling
Random point count survey
Data format Raw
Parameters for data collection Soil properties
Plant structure and diversity
Tree diversity and health
Bird diversity and community structure
Description of data collection Data was collected by physically removing a soil sample from random locations on islands to be analysed in a laboratory while plant and tree species were recorded by observing specimens on site within randomly selected plots or point count locations respectively. Bird species were recorded by observing species or hearing the song associated with that species.
Data source location Guntersville Reservoir, Guntersville, Alabama, USA
Data accessibility Data are presented with this article
Related research article Veum, L. M., Dorr, B. S., Hanson-Dorr, K. C., Moore, R. J., & Rush, S. A. (2019). Double-crested cormorant colony effects on soil chemistry, vegetation structure and avian diversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 453, 117588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117588
  • Value of the Data

  • Our findings highlight that breeding Double-crested cormorants have long-term impacts to soil, vegetation structure, tree density and health and bird diversity on insular, temperate forest ecosystems in the southeastern U.S [1].

  • No previous data exist on impacts of cormorants to bird communities and limited data of effects on soil, water quality, and trees in the southeastern U.S.

  • This data is useful to scientists conducting future research on the effects of cormorants as well as land managers and regulatory agencies who want to manage and control damage from cormorants and their numbers on breeding grounds

  • More research is needed to fully understand the indirect effects of cormorant occupancy on bird communities, such as a decrease in avian diversity, which this data can be a basis for

  • This data provides a baseline reference for future research or further avenues for bird counts and for studies on other species such as small mammals or amphibian communities

1. Data

The figure provided illustrates the locations of sampled islands on Guntersville Reservoir (Fig. 1). The reservoir is divided into four major zones, with zones 1 and 2 our main focus due to the consistent presence of Double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) colonies. These two zones are subdivided into the individual islands sampled and were categorized into three treatment groups: colony, reference and historic. The datasets are tables that contain a comprehensive list of all species of tree, plant and birds recorded, as well as all soils nutrient values extracted from soil samples within islands on Guntersville Reservoir. Soil data (Table 1) is presented as each individual plot point on every island sampled, with column headings for island type and each soil nutrient content extracted. For plants (Table 2) and trees (Table 3) the common and scientific name are given with columns divided into colony, reference and historic with these columns further subdivided into individual islands sampled. The number under each is the total count of each species found on those individual islands. For birds (Table 4), the species name and scientific name are given, with the total count recorded under the columns of colony, historic and reference. Further, a Continental Concern Score was given for each recorded species [12]. All data included are raw values.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Study area and islands sampled on Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama, June–August 2016 and 2017. Zones 1 and 2, color coded have islands divided into three treatment groups (1a, 1b, 1c): colony (active cormorant colonies), reference (islands with no history of nesting) and historic (abandoned colony islands), for our sampling plots.

Table 1.

Summary of all soil nutrient concentration extracted from soil samples on plots located in active cormorant colonies (colony), islands with no history of nesting (reference) and abandoned colony islands (historic) on Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama, June–August 2016. Numbers in columns are the value for soil components for every plot point surveyed on all islands.

Island Island Type % OM P K Ca Mg Zn S Na pH NH4 NO3
CON HISTORIC 4.76 1704 352 2759 56 6.1 685 55 3.9 90.91 175.93
CON HISTORIC 5.25 788 232 1349 67 5.2 756 17 3.8 38.71 99.82
CON HISTORIC 2.92 576 100 865 85 3.6 420 15 4.3 15.73 27.31
CON HISTORIC 3.95 784 160 1004 45 3.1 569 10 4.3 19.06 18.18
CON HISTORIC 4.55 1036 209 997 40 3.9 655 16 3.6 9.36 84.37
CON HISTORIC 4.77 932 178 1721 72 5.5 687 17 4.2 20.24 37.78
CON HISTORIC 4.17 872 157 888 46 3.4 600 11 4.1 14.92 16.73
CON HISTORIC 3.59 220 169 1604 182 4.6 517 12 4.8 20.84 35.07
CON HISTORIC 3.68 856 206 1122 59 3.4 530 11 4.1 15 23.83
CON HISTORIC 3.01 74 64 760 53 1 433 130 4.6 22.33 24.79
CON HISTORIC 3.05 2002 475 4659 84 10.2 439 78 4.3 75.32 316.45
CON HISTORIC 4.48 1116 191 2416 51 10.2 645 20 4.4 32.61 70.43
CON HISTORIC 4.95 1800 168 3165 51 7.5 713 43 4 40.32 141.66
CON HISTORIC 3.46 2016 149 3473 42 7.9 498 37 4.2 20.14 99.23
CON HISTORIC 4.39 996 146 1184 54 4 632 20 3.7 10.02 6.25
CON HISTORIC 4.1 1068 181 1032 41 3 590 10 4.1 10.73 5.5
CON HISTORIC 2.52 1124 319 850 42 3.3 363 15 3.8 9.33 48.03
CON HISTORIC 3.07 180 204 1079 102 3.7 442 17 4.1 17.78 53.02
ENS REFERENCE 4.11 41 127 1487 62 2.7 592 86 5.2 46.59 0.86
ENS REFERENCE 3.45 9 69 3660 200 2.3 497 40 5.8 8.1 3.74
ENS REFERENCE 2.71 7 79 3597 152 1.6 390 43 6.4 6.73 0.15
ENS REFERENCE 1.39 7 29 2169 82 0.6 200 23 6.4 5.31 0.63
ENS REFERENCE 2.57 23 53 4003 67 1.1 370 44 6.7 7.39 3.3
ENS REFERENCE 4.88 149 159 4474 186 2.1 703 33 5.8 15.09 6.17
NCON1 COLONY 3.39 584 98 1713 59 3.2 488 56 4.3 17.99 36.34
NCON1 COLONY 4.77 349 153 1922 109 6.1 687 22 4.5 18.16 31.78
NCON1 COLONY 2.71 176 174 666 53 1.4 390 16 4.2 17.65 77.44
NCON1 COLONY 4.07 92 241 1744 194 2.9 586 22 4.7 32.72 25.39
NCON1 COLONY 3.49 53 298 1230 129 4.6 503 18 5.1 6.3 11.51
NCON1 COLONY 4.8 120 244 1669 121 3.9 691 21 4.3 16.11 31.97
NCON1 COLONY 3.39 654 248 1320 57 3.8 488 17 4.1 11.94 73.51
NCON2 COLONY 2.15 88 87 1181 76 3.9 310 20 4.7 9.64 45.8
NCON2 COLONY 3.44 388 99 1560 72 2.4 495 21 4.2 10.81 48.79
NCON2 COLONY 2.85 107 104 1250 158 3.4 410 15 4.6 11.72 49.92
NCON2 COLONY 3.05 488 249 1512 89 4.5 439 28 4.2 18.12 164.25
NCON2 COLONY 2.71 127 151 1089 125 2.1 390 19 4.4 18.94 69.11
NCON2 COLONY 4.47 47 173 1880 281 2.4 644 23 5.1 23.81 34.74
NCON2 COLONY 3.16 48 127 1449 205 2.1 455 14 4.9 15.18 50.74
NCON2 COLONY 2.25 55 213 783 123 2.3 324 11 4.6 6.49 23.9
NCON3 COLONY 2.31 12 89 1814 168 1.7 333 39 6 22.79 13.47
NCON3 COLONY 2.99 180 307 1786 144 4 431 59 4.7 102.81 194.25
NCON3 COLONY 3.76 47 155 2305 270 1.3 541 63 5.4 17.78 17.96
NCON3 COLONY 5.19 386 652 2380 176 3.6 747 56 4.7 29.36 99.7
NCON3 COLONY 3.46 108 147 2496 234 2.3 498 20 5.3 12.24 48.3
NCON3 COLONY 3.3 22 155 2323 244 2.9 475 23 5.4 8.73 27.38
NSAUT REFERENCE 3.05 97 62 1061 57 0.7 439 31 5.1 8.96 0.94
NSAUT REFERENCE 5.69 93 132 3181 144 1.9 819 43 5.7 26.5 1.19
NSAUT REFERENCE 3.41 448 58 2347 104 3.1 491 22 5.3 14.83 14.51
NSAUT REFERENCE 4.89 750 175 2089 76 6.7 704 33 4.3 47.19 85.79
NSAUT REFERENCE 4.13 177 80 3479 118 1.9 595 114 5.9 26.15 28.31
NSS REFERENCE 1.95 71 70 877 79 1.7 281 15 5.3 19.51 1.9
NSS REFERENCE 2.61 48 87 381 60 1.3 376 16 4.4 22.73 0.88
NSS REFERENCE 3.49 36 126 1139 171 1.8 503 20 5.1 39.07 0.22
NSS REFERENCE 2.99 51 125 685 102 1.3 431 24 5 24.03 2.2
NSS REFERENCE 3.83 39 111 1031 102 1.3 552 16 4.8 28.52 18.19
NSS REFERENCE 1.79 20 73 277 39 0.7 258 15 4.7 16.87 4.47
NSS REFERENCE 3.29 34 114 293 48 1.2 474 24 4.3 19.41 0.83
NSS REFERENCE 2.66 30 74 965 112 1 383 84 4.8 21.59 0.24
OLDC HISTORIC 3.92 1770 288 5628 97 14.5 564 23 4.9 11.42 23.39
OLDC HISTORIC 4.88 2944 364 7953 93 16.4 703 26 5.3 17.23 20.7
OLDC HISTORIC 4.82 1195 335 3950 83 15.6 694 18 5 25.98 47.89
OLDC HISTORIC 2.88 1372 214 3302 61 11.1 415 15 4.9 7.11 30.57
OLDC HISTORIC 1.45 1352 206 746 31 3.5 209 12 4.2 10.33 20.26
OLDC HISTORIC 2.81 782 159 448 47 1.4 405 12 3.9 8 24.1
OSS HISTORIC 2.48 562 227 1349 78 3.1 357 13 4.7 11.58 28.51
OSS HISTORIC 3.09 41 96 1916 154 6.8 445 176 5.3 31.1 14.91
OSS HISTORIC 2.85 502 150 1388 82 4.4 410 13 4.5 9.1 32.46
OSS HISTORIC 3.91 844 243 1997 134 7.3 563 32 4.4 13.41 33.98
OSS HISTORIC 4.37 71 76 1895 178 7.1 629 48 5.6 51.78 0.57
OSS HISTORIC 2.73 266 88 764 47 2.6 393 16 4.5 6.09 20.6
OSS HISTORIC 2.06 21 64 1467 99 1.6 297 33 5.3 5.54 3
OSS HISTORIC 2.25 20 75 1970 205 2.8 324 31 5.5 5.68 0.16
OSS HISTORIC 2.44 126 108 1707 92 2.2 351 16 4.8 9.19 20.22
OSS HISTORIC 2.38 35 103 2607 205 4.1 343 118 6.1 15.51 7.28
SECON REFERENCE 3.76 79 74 2078 78 3 541 99 5.6 20.59 10.85
SECON REFERENCE 2.56 282 172 1701 83 9.6 369 14 5 29.79 37.5
SECON REFERENCE 4.63 298 171 1736 92 7.4 667 12 4.6 19.27 42.59
SECON REFERENCE 2.69 160 100 2106 106 15.5 387 16 5.3 6.13 21.25
SECON REFERENCE 3.04 185 111 1739 109 13 438 14 5.2 18.69 28.89
SSS COLONY 5.17 1295 240 2952 59 9.5 744 12 4.6 15.68 21.85
SSS COLONY 4.11 976 366 1223 44 5 592 13 4.3 9.98 31.14
SSS COLONY 3.53 646 140 1330 84 3.9 508 13 4.5 12.54 23.22
SSS COLONY 4.42 564 243 1443 100 4.4 636 20 4.1 22.81 58.68
SSS COLONY 3.34 1195 444 2608 67 9.7 481 24 4.7 16.17 25.98
SSS COLONY 2.69 1545 448 2618 46 5.5 387 13 4.6 10.2 20.43
SSS COLONY 4.14 1240 232 1452 38 6.4 596 13 3.7 14.33 45.3
SSS COLONY 4.79 772 291 3402 130 8 690 44 4.5 53.6 160.29
SSS COLONY 2.19 716 209 3900 181 5.2 315 101 5.5 11.2 71.31
WNS REFERENCE 3.69 49 47 615 29 2.2 531 36 4.6 14.74 1.51
WNS REFERENCE 4.72 29 81 2193 68 1.9 680 45 5.5 41.4 4.57
WNS REFERENCE 2.43 29 31 423 21 1.3 350 30 4.9 9.11 0.38
WNS REFERENCE 2.57 34 62 1187 45 2.5 370 27 5.4 42.91 0.73
WNS REFERENCE 3.15 89 92 1288 83 0.8 454 49 5.3 17.84 0.13
WNS REFERENCE 1.47 8 38 1020 30 1.1 212 21 5.4 21.01 0.27
WNS REFERENCE 2.33 16 37 1626 57 1.9 336 22 5.9 28.19 0.69
WNS REFERENCE 2.12 47 45 779 22 1.7 305 36 5 23.57 0.41

Table 2.

Summary of all plant species documented on plots located in active cormorant colonies (colony), islands with no history of nesting (reference) and abandoned colony islands (historic) on Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama, June–August 2016. Numbers in table represent total count of each plant species on each individual island, with island abbreviation and treatment group shown in column head.

Common Name Native Status Scientific Name Colony Islands
Reference Islands
Historic Islands
NCON1–3 SSS NSAUT SECON NSS ENS/WNS OLD C CON OSS
Alabama sucklejack Native Berchemia Scandens 5 18 12
Alligator weed Non Alternanthera philoxeroides 149 20 1451
Beefsteak plant Non Perilla frutescens 53
Bermuda grass Non Cynodon dactylon 1
Black snakeroot Native Sanicula canadensis 1
Blackberry bush Native Rubus argutus 8 23 19 9 11 19 1
Bloodroot Native Sanguinara canadensis 1
Canada violet Native Viola canadensis 179 37
Carolina moonseed Native Cocculus carolina 4
Cat greenbriar Native Smilax glauca 7 4 3 51 9
Chinese lespedeza Non Lespedeza cuneata 23 6
Christmas fern Native Polystichum acrostichoides 5
Climbing hempvine Native Mikania scandens 8
Common wingstem Native Verbesina alternifolia 224 48
Creeping burhead Native Echinodorus cordifolius 24
Devil's darning needle Native Clematis virginiana 5
Ebony spleenwort Native Asplenium platyneuron 2
Elderberry Native Sambucus nigra 10 49 2 57 3 6
Goldenrod Native Solidago canadensis 76
Grass Native Poaceae Family 35
Gray's sedge Native Carex grayi 10 21
Gr. Marsh St. John's wart Native Hypericum walteri 53
Hazel alder Native Alnus serrulata 3
Horseweed Native Conyza canadensis 54
Indian strawberry Non Duchesnea indica 1 2 15
Japanese honeysuckle Non Lonicera japonica 17 12 27 3 171 23 15
Jewelweed Native Impatiens capensis 6 5 5 1 76
Lamb's quarter Non Chenopodium album 1
Lanceleaf greenbriar Native Smilax smallii 31 10 20 23 6 1 3 12
Late flowering boneset Native Eupatorium serotinum 11 6
Lizard's tail Native Saururus cernuus 4 35 155
Morning glory Non Ipomoea purpurea 39 1 38 6
Muscadine grape Native Vitis rotundifolia 52 9 10 6 27 1 1 18
Oatgrass Native Danthonia sp. 1 4
Partridge berry Native Mitchella repens 6
Passion flower Native Passiflora incarnata 7 2 1
Plantain Non Plantago sp. 1 15
Poison ivy Native Toxicodendron radicans 17 1 216 123 60 6 17
Pokeweed Native Phytolaca americana 285 468 30 1 906 1221 118
Potato bean Native Apios americana 3
Privet Non Ligustrum sp. 207 7 16 1 46
Roundleaf greenbrier Native Smilax rotundifolia 24 1 1 8 3 6
Saw greenbriar Native Smilax bona-nox 21
Sawgrass Non Cladium sp. 1
Smartweed Native Polygonum sp. 1180 1 1 8
Smooth ticktrefoil Native Desmodium laevigatum 9
St. Andrew's cross Native Hypericum hypercoides 2
Star cucumber Native Sicyos angulatus 2
Stinging nettle Non Urtica dioca 44 44 73
Strawberry bush Native Euonymus americanus 1
Swamp dogwood Native Cornus racemosa 3
Leather flower Native Clematis crispa 2 1 5 1
Switch cane Native Arundinaria gigantea 11
Threeawn grass Native Aristida sp. 10
Trumpet creeper Native Campsis radicans 10 3 10 5 3 22 4
Virginia creeper Native Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 3 31 6
Virginia dayflower Native Commelina virginica 89 11 41 287 43 682
Water pennywort Native Hydrocotyle sp. 53 85
Wild cotton Native Hibiscus moscheotos 4
Wild grape Native Vitis aestivalis 1 1
Wild Taro Non Colocasia esculenta 19
Woodland lettuce Native Lactuca floridana 9 52 56 18 21 26
Yam-leaved clematis Non Clematis terniflora 1
Yellow woodsorrel Native Oxalis Stricta 9

Table 3.

Summary of all tree species documented on plots located on islands with active cormorant colonies (colony), islands with no history of nesting (reference) and abandoned colony islands (historic) on Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama, June–August 2016. Values for each tree species are total count by species found on each individual island, where island abbreviation and treatment group is above each column.

Common Name Scientific Name Colony Islands
Reference Islands
Historic Islands
NCON1–3 SSS NSAUT SECON NSS ENS/WNS OLDC CON OSS
American elm Ulmus americana 1 6
American hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana 9 124
American sycamore Platanus occidentalis 1
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum 2 6
Black cherry Prunus serotina 12 11 2 72 3 6
Black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 29 15 34 15 110 19 7
Black oak Quercus velutina 23 5 94 63 2
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica 3
Boxelder Acer negundo 5 3 1 1 11
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 2
Carolina buckthorn Rhamnus caroliniana 35 9 4 1
China berry Melia azedarach 2
Common persimmon Diospyros virginiana 12 31 47 74 3 3
Devil's walking stick Aralia spinosa 2 2 4 140
Eastern redbud Cercis canadensis 4 2 10 2
Eastern red cedar Junipera virginiana 6 20 4
Flowering dogwood Cornus florida 19 10 1
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1
Hackberry Celtis occidentalis 7 3 8 2 9 3 1
Honey locust Gleditsia triacanthos 5
Loblolly pine Pinus taeda 11 2 4 2 23 2
Mimosa Albizia julibrissin 2
Mockernut hickory Carya tomentosa 1
Pawpaw Asimina triloba 16
Post oak Quercus stellata 1
Red buckeye Aesculus pavia 20 3
Red maple Acer rubrum 16 1 22 1 14 41 11 2
Red mulberry Morus rubra 19 1 6
Sassafras Sassafras albidum 1 2 1 11 102
Silver maple Acer saccharinum 7 2 2 2 2 2 1
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 12 7 5
Sweet gum Liquidambar styraciflua 2 17 23 114
Tulip poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 4 5 1 5 20 19 14 4
Water oak Quercus nigra 20 54 96
White ash Fraxinus americana 3 1
Willow oak Quercus phellos 11
Winged elm Ulmus alata 1
Winged sumac Rhus copallinum 3
Oak sp. Quercus sp. 1
Unknown genus 1 3 3

Table 4.

Summary of all avian species documented on active cormorant colonies (colony), islands with no history of nesting (reference) and abandoned colony islands (historic) on Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama, June–August 2017.

Species Scientific Name Colony Historic Reference CCS
American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos 4 5 3 7
Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica 1 8
Belted Kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon 2 2 10
Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata 1 2 8
Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Polioptila caerulea 1 5 7
Blue-winged warbler Vermivora cyanoptera 4 13
Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater 4 1 7
Brown-headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla 1 3 13
Canada Goose Branta canadensis 2 1 6
Carolina Chickadee Poecile carolinensis 10 8 17 9
Carolina Wren Thryothorus ludovicianus 25 36 26 7
Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscula 36 28 15 9
Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas 2 1 9
Downy Woodpecker Picoides pubescens 1 1 7
Eastern Kingbird Tyrannus turannus 9 9 15 11
Eastern Phoebe Sayornis phoebe 2 3 8
Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus 10 10 25 11
Eastern Wood-peewee Contopus virens 1 1 17 10
European Starling Sturnus vulgaris 1 4 3 7
Fish Crow Corvus ossifragus 2 8 1 10
Great-blue Heron Ardea herodias 2 4 4 8
Hairy Woodpecker Leuconotopicus villosus 1 6
House Finch Haemorhous mexicanus 1 6
House Sparrow Passer domesticus 1 8
House Wren Troglodytes aedon 1 5
Indigo Bunting Passerina cyanea 1 9
Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura 5 6
Northern Cardinal Cardinalis 66 63 54 5
Northern Flicker Colaptes auratus 1 3 9
Northern Mockingbird Mimus polyglottus 2 1 8
Orchard Oriole Icterus spurius 3 4 10
Osprey Pandion haliaetus 8 11 15 7
Pileated Woodpecker Hylatomus pileatus 2 2 7
Pine Warbler Setophaga pinus 6 1 3 7
Prairie Warbler Setophaga discolor 1 14
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea 1 2 14
Purple Martin Progne subis 7 10
Red-bellied Woodpecker Melanerpe carolinus 1 4 5 7
Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus 2 1 6
Red-headed Woodpecker Setophaga pinus 3 13 2 13
Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus 3 4 8 8
Ruby-throated Hummingbird Archilochus colubris 2 2 8
Tufted Titmouse Baeolophus bicolor 4 8 16 7
White-breasted Nuthatch Sitta carolinensis 2 6
White-eyed Vireo Vireo griseus 2 8
Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Sphyrapicus varius 1 7
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus 7 4 12
Yellow-breasted Chat Icteria virens 1 10
Yellow-throated Warbler Setophaga dominica 4 3 10

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

Twelve islands were sampled in Guntersville Reservoir, with these islands divided into three treatment groups: colony (islands colonized by breeding cormorants), reference (islands with no cormorant occupancy) and historic (islands that were colonized by cormorants but subsequently abandoned). Five islands were categorized as colony, four as reference and three as historic islands. Colony islands included New Connors 1, New Connors 2, New Connors 3, South Sauty and North Sauty. Reference islands were selected based on proximity and a similar area to colony islands. Reference islands included SE Connors, North South Sauty, West North Sauty and East North Sauty. Historic islands included Old Connors, Connors and Old South Sauty.

A stratified random sampling approach was used to obtain locations on islands to collect all data. This sampling design was based on island size where the density of samples per unit of effort was constant across islands of differing size. We sampled each island multiple times (multiple plot points on islands) and therefore made whole island, not plot level, inferences. Almost all sample locations were determined from plots referenced in Lafferty et al. [2]. Due to erosion or inaccessibility, some plots needed to be replaced which was accomplished by overlaying a 10 meter × 10 meter (m) grid over the islands and selecting plots by proportionally sampling 20% of the 10m2 grid on each island [2]. This grid was created using orthoquad imagery of Guntersville Reservoir and ArcMap v.10.1 (ESRI, 2012). Plot center was determined by recording the latitude and longitude at the center of the plot.

2.1. Soil

Soil sampling was done by placing a 1m2 quadrat made of PVC pipe at plot center. The surface detritus and litter layers were brushed away and the soil sample was taken from the center of the 1m2 plot to a depth of 22 centimeters (cm) using a soil auger (9 cm diameter) and hand trowel. Once collected, soil was homogenized and kept cool and dry until all soil collections were completed. For lab processing, nutrient concentrations (kg/ha) and base saturation were extracted from each sample which were used to determine percent concentrations for the following soil characteristics: percent organic material (%OM), pH, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), zinc (Zn), sulfur (S), sodium (Na), hydrogen (H), nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4). These nutrients were selected because of their importance in plant physiology and circulation and to their correlation with excess cormorant fecal deposits [1,3,4].

2.2. Community diversity

Habitat characteristics were measured at the same plot points for soil sampling. The same 1m2 quadrat was placed at plot center to measure percent plant cover, plant density, and plant diversity following procedures developed by Ayers et al. [5]. A digital image was taken of the plot before any further disturbance so that percent cover could be calculated. This was completed by uploading each image onto a computer and overlaying a grid comprised of 100 equal squares over the image [5]. Each box was recorded as covered (≥50% of the box covered by live vegetation) or not covered (≤50% covered by live vegetation). Once all 100 boxes were recorded for an image, the number of covered boxes indicated live plant cover for that plot. Plant diversity was recorded by identifying all species in a plot and plant density was recorded by counting each individual of that species in each plot. Any plants that could not be identified were given a unique number and pressed for future identification with the density of these unknown species still counted and recorded.

Canopy cover was measured using a spherical densiometer [6] in each cardinal direction at 5 m from plot center. Percent canopy recorded in each direction was used to calculate average canopy cover for each plot. A Nudd's board [7] was used to measure vegetation density of midstory heights in two random, cardinal directions at 15 m from plot center. The proportion of each 0.5 m (0–2 m) interval covered by vegetation was recorded as a categorical value between 1 and 5 where: (1) 0–20%, (2) 21–40%, (3) 41–60%, (4) 61–80% and (5) 81–100% of vegetation cover [7]. Coverage values were averaged to obtain a single midstory value for each plot.

At all plot points, all tree species in a 10 m radius from plot center were identified, with individual trees that had a diameter at breast height (DBH) of over 8 cm given a unique number, and DBH and vigor class recorded. The vigor class scale was a metric for how healthy a tree was on a scale of 1–5 where: (1) No decay, 100% healthy; (2) Mostly healthy, < 25% decay; (3) Not healthy and/or dying, > 50% decay; (4) Newly dead, 100% decay; and (5) Old snag [2]. Trees less than 8 cm were identified to species and a count of each species recorded. Each plant and tree species was designated as native or non-native using data from the USDA Plant Database [8].

Point count surveys of bird species were conducted on all islands. A point count records all birds heard or seen at a fixed spot for a fixed amount of time [9,10]. A bulls’ eye sheet was used during the survey to document the species of bird, the distance from the observer, relative direction, and time detected [9,10]. Points were not randomly selected due to the small size of the islands and the recommendation that points be at least 200 m away from each other [10]. Because all islands, except Connors Island, were less than 200 m in size, one point was selected as close to the center of each island as possible for an even, whole island recording. For Connors Island, two points were selected that were over 200 m apart from each other and centered at opposite ends of the island. Once plots were determined, point counts were started and repeated six times at each location, with one week between survey times.

Islands were split by cormorant, colony complex groups (Connors, South Sauty and North Sauty; Fig. 1) and split between two recording teams. Connors Island complex had six islands total, therefore colony complex groups where split into two, Connors Islands and North and South Sauty Islands (Fig. 1). The Connors Island complex was further subdivided by reference and historic (e.g., SE Connors, Connors and Old Connors Islands) and current colony islands (e.g., New Connors 1, 2 & 3), with recording teams alternating between the two every trip. South and North Sauty complexes had three islands each, therefore one group collected data at South Sauty complex and the other team at the North Sauty complex, alternating every visit (Fig. 1). Before point counts began, we selected colony island complexes at random (‘Connors’ or ‘Sautys’) and then islands within complexes at random so no island was recorded at the same time of day for a visit. For the first survey, a complex was selected by flipping a coin. Successively, teams alternated the starting complex for each visit. Two days were designated for data collection, ‘Connors’ complex one day and ‘Sautys’ for another, unless weather delayed field work.

Point count surveys began at dawn, which was established by using a weather application. Once at the point, the observer waited 5 minutes before starting to minimize effects of disturbance from arrival. After the waiting period, a 10 minute point count survey began, documenting all birds heard and seen during the 10 minutes. All flyover birds were recorded on the data sheet as well as weather characteristics (wind, cloud cover, rain). A conservation concern score was given to all species found on the plot points. This score was obtained from Partners in Flight Avian Conservation Assessment Database (PIF; Panjabi et al. [11]).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, and National Wildlife Research Center for help in funding, sampling design and planning. This publication is a contribution of the Tennessee Valley Authority, Mississippi State University and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center.

Contributor Information

Leah Moran Veum, Email: leah.veum@usda.gov.

Brian S. Dorr, Email: brian.s.dorr@usda.gov.

Katie Hanson-Dorr, Email: katie.c.hanson-dorr@usda.gov.

R.J. Moore, Email: rjmoore@tva.gov.

Scott A. Rush, Email: scott.rush@msstate.edu.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Veum L.M., Dorr B.S., Hanson-Dorr K.C., Moore R.J., Rush S.A. Double-crested cormorant colony effects on soil chemistry, vegetation structure and avian diversity. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019;453:117588. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lafferty D.J., Hanson-Dorr K.C., Prisock A.M., Dorr B.S. Biotic and abiotic impacts of Double-crested Cormorant breeding colonies on forested islands in the southeastern United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016;369:10–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boutin C., Dobbie T., Carpenter D., Hebert C.E. Effects of Double-crested Cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus Less.) on island vegetation, seedbank, and soil chemistry: evaluating island restoration potential. Restor. Ecol. 2011;19(6):720–727. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rush S.A., Verkoeyen S., Dobbie T., Dobbyn S., Hebert C.E., Gagnon J., Fisk A.T. Influence of increasing populations of Double-crested Cormorants on soil nutrient characteristics of nesting islands in western Lake Erie. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 2011;37(2):305–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ayers C.R., Hanson-Dorr K.C., O'Dell S., Lovell C.D., Jones M.L., Suckow J.R., Dorr B.S. Impacts of colonial waterbirds on vegetation and potential restoration of island habitats. Restor. Ecol. 2015;23(3):252–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lemmon P.E. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. For. Sci. 1956;2:314–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nudds T.D. Quantifying the vegetative structure of wildlife cover. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1977;5(3):113–117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3781453 Stable URL: [Google Scholar]
  • 8.USDA N.R.C.S. National Plant Data Team; Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA: 2018. The PLANTS Database.https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov/java/ [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ralph C. John, Sauer John R., Droege Sam. vol. 187. DIANE Publishing; 1995. Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US. Department of Agriculture. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hamel P.B., Smith W.P., Twedt D.J., Woehr J.R., Morris E., Hamilton R.B., Cooper R.J. vol. 39. US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station; New Orleans, LA: 1996. A Land Manager's Guide to Point Counts of Birds in the Southeast. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-120; p. 120. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Panjabi A.O., Blancher P.J., Easton W.E., Stanton J.C., Demarest D.W., Dettmers R., Rosenberg K.V. 2017. The Partners in Flight Handbook on Species Assessment. Partners in Flight Technical Series No. 3. Bird Conservancy of the Rockies.http://www.birdconservancy.org/resourcecenter/publications/ [Google Scholar]

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES