Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2019 Nov 18;14(11):e0220542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220542

Chronic exercise modulates the cellular immunity and its cannabinoid receptors expression

Salvador Valencia-Sánchez 1, Karen Elizabeth Nava-Castro 2,#, Margarita Isabel Palacios-Arreola 2,#, Oscar Prospéro-García 3,, Jorge Morales-Montor 4,*, René Drucker-Colín 1,
Editor: Junpeng Wang5
PMCID: PMC6860935  PMID: 31738771

Abstract

The impact of performing exercise on the immune system presents contrasting effects on health when performed at different intensities. In addition, the consequences of performing chronic exercise have not been sufficiently studied in contrast to the effects of acute bouts of exercise. The porpoise of this work was to determine the effect that a popular exercise regimen (chronic/moderate/aerobic exercise) has on the proportion of different immune cell subsets, their function and if it affects the cannabinoid system with potentially functional implications on the immune system. A marked increase in several immune cell subsets and their expression of cannabinoid receptors was expected, as well as an enhanced proliferative and cytotoxic activity by total splenocytes in exercised animals. For this study male Wistar rats performed treadmill running 5 times a week for a period of 10 weeks, at moderate intensity. Our results showed a significant decrease in lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4+, Tγδ, and CD45 RA+ cells) and an increase in the cannabinoid receptors expression in those same cell. Although functional assays did not reveal any variation in total immunoglobulin production or NK cells cytotoxic activity, proliferative capability of total splenocytes increased in trained rats. Our results further support the notion that exercise affects the immunological system and extends the description of underlying mechanisms mediating such effects. Altogether, our results contribute to the understanding of the benefits of exercise on the practitioner´s general health.

Introduction

The beneficial impact of exercise on the practitioner’s general health is a well-known fact [13]. Studies suggesting a connection between physical activity and the improvement of health have generated information that ranges from describing adipose tissue loss to changes in genetic expression [4,5]. It is well known that the proper composition of the immune system (IS) and its correct function will allow it to actively overcome challenges that otherwise would compromise the organism’s health, such as infections, autoimmune diseases, cancer, etc. It is worth mentioning that the acknowledgment of those benefits conferred by the regular practice of exercise has led to its implementation as an alternative/complementary therapy against metabolic diseases [6,7], and in recent works even for the treatment of cancer [8].

Nonetheless, data regarding the changes induced by exercise in cell subpopulations of the IS and their function seems to be controversial [911]. This may be partly explained by the use of different exercise paradigms. Along with this, a classic idea has been established about such changes promoted by exercise, being those models of moderate/chronic exercise the promoters of an enhanced IS, while acute/high intensity models the responsible of hindering it. Finally, evidence suggesting a beneficial effect of the performance of exercise, on modalities previously described as detrimental, has been gathered and old data reinterpreted as in Campbell and Turner’s review [12], so nowadays evidence debunking the previous conception of high intensity/long duration or chronic exercise evoked immune suppression increases, at least for several aspects of the immune function. On the same line, many studies document the immediate changes on the IS induced by a single bout of exercise, as opposed to the effects of its chronic performance, which suggest different outcomes and in some cases opposite effects over the IS [11,13,14]. Less attention has been paid to such studies and to the long-term alterations that it may produce on the IS. For instance, macrophages extracted from mice trained for 12 weeks exhibited increased phagocytic activity, superoxide anion production and glucose consumption when compared to macrophages obtained from sedentary mice [11]. Consistently other studies have shown that chronic exercise alters the function of T cells, affecting their production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, including the up-regulation of IL-2, an important cytokine related to proliferation and activation [14]. Likewise, trained rats presented increased glucose consumption, IL-2 production and IL-2R expression by their lymphocytic subpopulations. Furthermore, those changes obtained in trained animals seem to last days after the last exercise bout [14].

Many molecular pathways that are affected by exercise possess an immunoregulatory potential, ranging from variations in the energy substrates [15,16] to the activation of signaling pathways with direct immune-regulatory relevance, such as: the release of IL 6 by skeletal muscle [4,13], release of stress hormones, catecholamines [4,17] and neurotransmitters by the sympathetic and para-sympathetic system, among others. Hence, in order to contribute to the further understanding of these effects we decided to evaluate the cannabinergic system (CBS). Regarding this system, some studies have reported a subtle increase of anandamide, a widely studied molecule that acts as a CB1 and CB2 receptor agonist, after short bouts of aerobic exercise. Such increase was sustained up to several minutes after the conclusion of the physical activity [1820]. Furthermore, both receptors are widely distributed in the immune cells and IS structures [2123] and when activated, together or independently, produce changes in the function of several immune cells, suggesting that their activation is able to modulate the IS function. These modulatory actions have been explored in vitro [24,25] and in vivo [23]. Likewise, the expression of cannabinergic receptors (CBR) on the surface of immune cells, varies according to their activation and inflammatory status. Given that new data suggests its relevance as an immune-modulatory system, the expression of these receptors provides us with interesting and relevant information about the IS status.

Altogether, the objective of our study is to explore the long-term changes that chronic exercise (CE) produces in the proportion of splenocytes from the adaptive and innate immunity, and to assess the effects that it has on their function (by performing proliferation tests and cytotoxicity test with total splenocytes in vitro), and finally to determine if the expression of CBR in these cells is affected by this model of exercise. Furthermore, coherently with previous works on this topic, we expect that the changes evoked by CE will alter the composition of several of the immune cell subsets studied, mainly those from lymphoid origin. CE will also boost their cytotoxic activity and proliferative capacity. In terms of the cannabinoid receptor expression, we anticipate that CE will increase their expression in the entire cell subsets studied.

Finally, this study provide relevant information about those changes elicited on the IS by a way of exercising chosen by a big proportion of the society nowadays. Besides, our results further support the notion that exercise affects the IS and extends the description of underlying mechanisms mediating such effects.

Materials and methods

Ethic statement

Animal care and experimental practices were conducted at the Animal Facilities of the Instituto de Fisiología Celular (IFC), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). All procedures in the experimental animals were approved by the Institutional Care and Animal Use Committee (CICUAL), adhering to Mexican regulation (NOM-062-ZOO-1999), in accordance with the recommendations from the National Institute of Health (NIH) of the United States of America (Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals). Euthanasia of experimental animals was performed in a humanitarian way.

Animals

For this study, male Wistar rats ranging between 250 to 300 g were used, proceeding from our own breeding at the animal facilities of IFC, UNAM. The animals were housed at IFC with controlled temperature (22°C) and 12h light-dark cycles, with water and Purina LabDiet 5015 chow ad libitum (Purina, St. Louis MO). Sacrifice of those animals used exclusively for flow cytometry or samples extraction for cellular culture, was carried out by cervical dislocation after pentobarbital sodium (Pisabental®, México) anaesthesia. Animals that also were used for the extraction of the brain were sacrificed by an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (Purina, St. Louis MO). All procedures were carried out in a humanitarian way ensuring the maximisation of efforts in order to alleviate suffering.

Exercise protocol

Animals were set in one of three experimental groups: Exercised (EXE), Treadmill control (TC) and sedentary group (SED). Animals in the exercised group performed treadmill running 5 times a week for a period of 10 weeks, for which a previous habituation of one week was completed. During the habituation week, animals were placed inside the treadmill and then it was turned on at minimum capacity (4m/min) for 5 minutes per day. Once the habituation period was completed, animals started training. On the first day of training, rats ran at 7.5 m/min for 10 minutes, then speed and duration of exercise was escalated gradually each consecutive day, in order to achieve a daily exercise bout of 40 minutes at 15 m/min by the third week. Remaining weeks of training were kept constant in speed and duration until the sacrifice of the animals. It is noteworthy, that this training protocol equals to moderate chronic exercise, as it has been demonstrated in the works by Pilis and Carvalho [26,27] through the calculation of the velocity at the lactate threshold. No electrical stimulus was used to incentive animals to run inside the treadmill.

Animals sited in the TC group were placed inside the treadmill at minimum capacity (4m/min) for 10 minutes, 5 times per week, for the same period of time than the exercised group (10 weeks). While being inside the treadmill, animals from TC group were exposed to the same context than animals from the EXE group without being exercised, reflecting any effect in the results prompted by sources other than exercise itself. Animals conforming the SED group were kept alive in standard conditions for the same amount of time than the other two groups.

At the end of the training period animals from every group were allowed to rest for one day in order to eliminate any possible effect of acute exercising. Afterwards, animals were sacrificed either by an overdose of pentobarbital sodium or by anesthesia with the same product followed by cervical dislocation (Pisabental®, México), afterwards the samples were taken.

Flow cytometry

Spleens were manually disaggregated using a 50μm nylon mesh, and cells resuspended in PBS. Erythrocytes in the solution were lysed using ACK buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 10mM KHCO3, 0.1mM Na2EDTA, pH 7.3) for 10 minutes and washed three times with PBS, then cells were resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS, FBS, 0.02% NaN3).

Approximately 1x106 cells were incubated with the following antibodies in order to characterize spleen immune subpopulations: Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated- anti rat CD3 (IF4, Biolegend), PE Cy5-conjugated- anti rat CD4 (biolegend), PE-conjugated anti rat CD8a (Biolegend), PE-conjugated -anti rat CD45RA (Biolegend), Alexa Fluor® 647-conjugated- anti rat CD161 (biolegend), biotin-conjugated- anti rat CD11b (OX-42, Bioloegend), PE-conjugated anti rat TCR (V65, Biolengend). For the determination of macrophages, additionally to the use of anti CD11b antibody, a different gating was used, corresponding to bigger and more complex cells, in order to exclude other cells from the myeloid linage. Staining of the cell subpopulations was made by duplicate in order to additionally mark on each set one of the cannabinoid receptors.

For the staining of cannabinoid receptors, the polyclonal primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti Cannabinoid receptor I (abcam®) and rabbit anti Cannabinoid receptor II (abcam®), followed by the Secondary antibodies: AlexaFluor® 488- conjugated goat anti rabbit IgG (ThermoFisher Scientific) and DyLight® 649- conjugated- anti rabbit IgG (Vector laboratories).

In order to assess proliferation, a Cell Trace CFSE cell proliferation kit was used (Invitrogen). Propidium iodide was used to determine viability of cells during cytotoxic assays. Attune Cytometer (life technologies) was used to obtain data which was further analyzed with FlowJo software (Treestar Inc.).

Proliferation assays

Total splenocytes were obtained as previously described and quantified on a Neubauer chamber. Subsequently, splenocytes were marked with CFSE cell tracer, which was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Finally, cells were resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium (ATCC® 30 2001). Splenocytes were cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium plus Ionomicyn (SIGMA-ALDRICH® 10634) and PMA (SIGMA-ALDRICH® P8139-1MG) at concentrations100 nm and and 25ng/ml for 72 hours. Proliferation was assessed using an Attune cytometer (Life Technologies) with blue and red lasers, obtained data was further analyzed with FlowJo software (Treestar Inc.).

Cell culture

Yac 1 cell line (ATCC® - TIB 160) was cultivated in RPMI 1640 medium (ATCC® 30–2001) supplemented with 10% Fetal bovine serum (FBS, ATCC® 30–2020) and kept with air, 95%; carbon dioxide (CO2), 5% at 37ºC. Yac 1 cells were expanded for a week then counted on a Neubauer chamber and finally stained with CFSE kit for further use in cytotoxic assays.

In vitro cytotoxic assay

Yac 1 cells were stained with cell trace CFSE kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol and used as target cells for the assay. A single cell splenocyte suspension was obtained from rats in the different experimental conditions as previously described, they were counted and used as the effector cells in the assay. Finally both, effector and target cells were co-cultivated in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS for 4 hours, into 96 round well plates. Thereafter co-cultures were removed from the incubator and stained with Propidium Iodide and washed with Facs buffer. Acquisition was performed in an Attune Cytometer (life technologies) and data further analyzed with FlowJo software (Treestar Inc.).

Corticosterone and IgG levels assesssment

Animals were anesthetized and sacrificed one day after concluding their experimental condition, at the same time that they had been set for exercising (14:00–16:00 hr.). Cardiac puncture was performed in order to extract blood, which was immediately centrifuged at 4000rpm to collect the blood serum. Subsequently, blood serum was divided into two aliquots and stored at -70ºC for later use. Corticosterone levels were assessed with a Corticosterone ELISA kit (Abcam® ab-108821) and procedures underwent according to manufacturer’s protocol. Assessment of the levels of IgG in serum were carried out on a 96 flat bottom well plate. The plate was previously sensitized with a dilution of blood serum (1:1000), washed and blocked with a 1% albumin solution. Subsequently, the plate was incubated for 2 hours antibodies α IgG rat HRP were incubated, and once incubation finished, several washes were performed, chromogen was added to the wells, the reaction was stopped and the reading of the plate was carried out on a Stat Fax 4200 microplate reader (Awarness Technology).

Statistical analysis

For data regarding the changes of every cell subpopulation, a one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) was performed followed by a Tukey post-hoc test. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05, with the actual p value and n being stated in each figure legend. Before the selection of the ANOVA test the normal distribution of the data was assessed via Shapiro-Wilk test. A similar process was carried out for the statistical analysis of the data regarding the proliferation and cytotoxicity tests, as well as for the data concerning the levels of corticosterone and IgG in serum. For the assessment of the expression of CBR, a two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) was performed, because of the consideration of two independent variables (group and CBR), followed by a Bonferroni post-hoc test with the same significant difference criterion. Data from all the experiments were charted as mean ± standard error, and analysed with Prism 5 software for Mac (GraphPad Software Inc.)

Results

Chronic-moderate exercise affects body composition parameters but not total ingestion of food or water

After ten weeks of rats being exposed to each experimental condition, animals were weighted, and results showed a significant gain of weight on those animals corresponding to both control groups (SED, 490.8g; TC, 495.8g) against those from the EXE group (452g). ANOVA, p = 0.0007, n = 6, P<0.05. Accordingly, when samples were extracted, an observable difference in fat accumulation was perceived among the experimental groups, being those animals that performed the physical activity the ones with the lower amount of visceral fat. Interestingly water and food ingestion per week did not change among animals from the different experimental groups (p = 0.3309, n = 6, P<0.05, and p = 0.3312, n = 6, P<0.05 respectively).

Chronic-moderate exercise alters the composition of splenocyte subpopulations

Distribution of immune cells is a parameter that provides information about deficiencies or alterations from the IS, therefore we decided to evaluate several cell subpopulations from the innate and adaptive immune system in the spleen of rats that underwent different experimental conditions (S1 Fig). The immune cell subpopulations from the innate immune response that were analyzed corresponded to: NK cells (CD161+) and macrophages (CD11b+) for which flow cytometry analysis did not reflect a significant difference among groups (Fig 1). Analyzed cells from the adaptive immune response were: total T lymphocytes (CD3+), T helper lymphocytes (CD4+), cytotoxic T lymphocytes, Tγδ lymphocytes (Tγδ+) and B lymphocytes (CD45 RA+). For those cells studied, flow cytometry analysis reflected a decrease in the proportion of T helper lymphocytes (Fig 2) and in B lymphocytes (Fig 3) from the EXE group when compared to both control groups, SED and TC (Fig 2 and Fig 3), therefore considering such changes an effect of CE. On the other hand Tγδ lymphocytes showed an increase in the EXE group when compared to SED and TC groups (Fig 2), once more reflecting a change attributable to training. On the other hand, T cytotoxic cells decreased in TC and EXE groups in contrast to SED control group, reflecting an effect non attributable to exercise, but to the exposure to the treadmill (Fig 2). Total T lymphocytes (CD3+), did not show changes among the experimental groups (Fig 2).

Fig 1. Changes in the composition of splenocyte populations related to the innate immune response.

Fig 1

(A) Representative dot plot of the cytometric analysis of the subpopulation percentages. (B) Determination of splenocyte subpopulations from the innate immune response one day after being exposed to each condition in the different groups: SED, TC and EXE; data from 4 independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SE. No subpopulation showed statistically significant changes: Natural killer cells (ANOVA, p = 0.0683, n = 10), and Macrophages (ANOVA, p = 0.0273, n = 10).

Fig 2. Changes in the composition of splenocyte populations related to the adaptive immune response.

Fig 2

(A) Representative dot plot of the cytometric analysis of the subpopulation percentages. (B) Determination of splenocyte populations from the adaptive immune response in the different groups: SED, TC and EXE; data from 4 independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SE. Subpopulation that showed statistically significant changes were: T helper lymphocytes (ANOVA, p = 0.0008, n = 5) and Tγδ lymphocytes (ANOVA, p = 0.0002, n = 10). T lymphocytes (ANOVA, p = 0.3739, n = 12), cytotoxic T lymphocytes (ANOVA, p = 0.0016, n = 12). * Means statistically different from the two other groups, P<0.05.

Fig 3. Changes in the composition of B-lymphocytes from spleen.

Fig 3

(A) Representative dot plot of the cytometric analysis of the subpopulation percentages. (B) Determination of B-lymphocytes of spleen of rats in the different groups: SED, TC and EXE; data from 4 independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SE. B lymphocytes showed a statistically significant change (ANOVA, p = 0.3601, n = 10). * Means statistically different from the two other groups, P<0.05.

Modulation of CBR Expression in splenocytes after chronic exercise

CBR are widely distributed among immune cell subpopulations and structures from the IS. The expression of CBR on immune cells has been demonstrated to vary depending on activation or inflammatory profile, among other parameters. Thus, we decided to evaluate if CE would promote changes in the expression of CBR on splenocytes.

From the innate immune system, NK cells (CD161+) and macrophages were analyzed. NK cells from EXE and TC groups showed a decrease in CB2 expression, compared to SED, while no change was observed in CB1 expression. Macrophages (CD11b+) did not present changes in the expression of any CBR among groups (Fig 4). From the adaptive immune response, T helper lymphocytes (CD4+ cells) presented an increase in the expression of CB1 in animals from EXE group when compared to both control groups SED and TC, while no statistically significant difference was observed regarding CB2 expression. A similar phenomenon was observed in Tγδ subpopulation from EXE animals, which showed a higher expression of CB1 when compared to SED and TC groups (Fig 5), with no change in the expression of CB2. The expression of CBR did not vary in the subpopulations of T lymphocytes (CD3+) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes when experimental groups were compared (Fig 5).

Fig 4. Expression of CBR in splenocyte populations related to the innate immune response.

Fig 4

Analysis of the expression of CB1 and CB2 CBR in splenocyte populations from the innate immune response (NK’s and macrophages) among experimental groups: SED (shaded bar), TC (white bar) and EXE (Solid bar); data from 4 independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SE. Lines connecting bars represent comparison among groups, * p<0.05. Two way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test, n = 9.

Fig 5. Expression of CBR in splenocyte populations related to the adaptive immune response.

Fig 5

Analysis of the expression of CB1 and CB2 CBR in splenocyte populations from the adaptive immune response (T lymphocytes; n = 10, T helper lymphocytes; n = 8, cytotoxic T Lymphocytes; n = 10 and Tγδ n = 8) among experimental groups: SED (shaded bar), TC (white bar) and EXE (Solid bar); data from 4 independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SE. Lines connecting bars represent comparison among groups, * p<0.05. Two way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test.

On the other hand, B lymphocytes from the spleen of EXE animals showed a significant increase in CB2 expression, compared to those from SED and TC groups, whilst no change was reflected between groups in the expression of CB1 (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Expression of CBR in B lymphocytes from spleen.

Fig 6

Analysis of the expression of CB1 and CB2 CBR in B lymphocytes from spleen among experimental groups: SED (shaded bar), TC (white bar) and EXE (Solid bar); data from 4 independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SE. Lines connecting bars represent comparison among groups, * p<0.05. Two way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test, n = 10.

Immunoglobulin G levels are not altered by chronic exercising

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is the most abundant type of immunoglobulins and a reliable parameter to assess the function of plasmatic cells. A change in the amount of IgG could represent an ongoing infectious process or an alteration on the normal function of plasmatic cells when observed in intact animals. We decided to assess if the total production of IgG would vary among our experimental groups. To do so, we performed a direct semi-quantitative ELISA. When data was analyzed statistically (ANOVA, n = 6, p = 0.0676) results did not show any significant difference among the experimental groups: SED (optic density 2.731),TC and EXE (OD 2.973 and 2.871 respectively, S2 Fig).

Chronic exercise enhances proliferative capacity but not cytotoxic activity of total splenocytes

Proliferative capacity and cytotoxic activity have been tested before in order to assess the degree of competence of a subject’s immune system. In order to observe if chronic exercise has any effect on both features we performed in vitro tests. For the proliferation assay we obtained total splenocytes and cultivated them on complete RPMI medium plus PMA and ionomycin for 72 hours. Data analyzed reflected no difference among groups in their proliferation index (Fig 7B). Nevertheless, total splenocytes from EXE group showed a higher proportion of dividing cells when compared to SED and TC groups (Fig 7C). Furthermore, we decided to test the proliferative capacity of the immune cell subpopulations and we found that B lymphocytes and NK cells from the EXE group exhibited a higher proportion of dividing cells than both SED and TC groups (Fig 7D).

Fig 7. Effect of chronic exercise on splenocyte proliferation.

Fig 7

(A) Representative histograms of cytometric analysis of dividing cells. Two parameters were considered to assess the proliferative capacity of splenocytes: (B) the proliferation index, which did not change due to chronic exercise and (C) the proportion of dividing cells, where we observed an increase in the exercised group when compared to both control groups (ANOVA, p = 0.0092, n = 5). (D) Analysis of proliferative capacity of specific splenocyte subpopulations: T helper lymphocytes (ANOVA, p = 0.4543, n = 5) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (ANOVA, p = 0.5248, n = 6) did not show any change between groups; B lymphocytes (ANOVA, p = 0.0006, n = 6) and Natural killers (ANOVA, p = 0.0191, n = 6) from EXE did show an in increase in the proportion of dividing cells when compared to both control groups. In graphic bars SED is represented by shaded bar, TC by white bar and EXE by the solid bar.

In order to measure the cytotoxic capacity of splenocytes from the different groups, we performed a cytotoxicity test utilizing Yac1 cells as target cells and cultivating them with total splenocytes from animals of the different groups. Yac1 cells were previously marked with CFSE, and at the end of the test dead cells were dyed with propidium iodide, so double positive cells represented the target cells killed. The assay was carried out at three different effector/target ratios: 10:1, 50:1 and 100:1 and none showed any significant difference among treatments after the statistical analysis (Fig 8).

Fig 8. Cytotoxic activity of total splenocytes in vitro.

Fig 8

(A) Representative dot plot of cytometric analysis of killed target cells percentage. (B) Cytotoxic activity of total splenocytes was assessed in vitro at three different ratios (effector cells: target cells, 10:1, 50:1 and 100:1); data from 2 independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SE, with an n = 6 for each condition. No differences were found among the groups at any of the different ratios. In bar graphics SED is represented by the shaded bar, TC by the white bar and EXE by the solid bar.

Corticosterone level is not altered by chronic exercise

Corticosterone level is considered a reliable stress marker in animals. In order to further comprehend the data obtained, we decided to analyze if corticosterone levels of blood serum differ among groups, reflecting a possible long-term effect of stress in exercised animals. When data was statistically analyzed (ANOVA, n = 6, p = 0.0473, Tukey’s) results show a significant difference among the experimental groups. Nonetheless, The post hoc analysis did not show any significant interaction among the experimental groups. Means of the groups: TC and EXE (102.6 and 96.5 ng/ml respectively) were notoriously higher than that of the SED group (46.8 ng/ml, S3 Fig).

Discussion

Although widely studied, the consequences of physical activity over the IS remain as a promising field not only to expand our comprehension on basic physiology, but also on physiopathology and the different processes that take part on the orchestration of the immune response. At first instance, our investigation tries to emulate in rats a popular paradigm of exercising in modern times across the global population, which involves the chronic performance of medium intensity aerobic exercise. Such particularities in our model have led us to asses its raw impact over the IS composition and its function. Notwithstanding, the vast majority of studies have focused in the effects of short bouts of exercise over the immediate changes in composition and function of the IS [1,11,28,29], and neglecting those focused on the effect of CE and its long lasting effects over the IS [13,30]. In this study we observed that components from the innate immune response were not affected by chronic-moderate exercise, while elements from the adaptive immune response did change in those animals that underwent physical training. T helper lymphocytes and B lymphocytes were decreased in trained animals, contrary to what would be expected according to the popular statement of moderate exercise enhancing a pro-inflammatory state [31,32]. On the other hand, Tγδ lymphocytes increased in animals from the EXE group, increase that could reflect an intensification in surveillance and protection of the upper respiratory tracts (URT) and mucosa tissue, idea that would be in accordance with the strengthened resistance against URT infections due to moderate exercising and opposite to the supposed effect of higher susceptibility to these infections in high performance athletes [29,3337]. Nonetheless, the reduction of T helper and B lymphocyte populations was unexpected, since these cells play a major role at recognizing antigens and therefore at orchestrating immune responses against new and already known threats and once activated they can polarize towards a pro-inflammatory or anti inflammatory state which modulates the activity of several other components from the innate and adaptive immune response. Consequently, the decrease of T helper lymphocytes as well as that of B lymphocytes made us wonder if it could be translated into a deficient immune response of animals of the EXE group.

Once we determined that our exercising paradigm did affect the composition of immune cells subpopulations, our next goal became to assess if those changes would be translated into functional alterations. To accomplish our purpose, we determined total IgG in serum among experimental groups and we also performed proliferation and cytotoxicity test in vitro. On the proliferation test, two parameters were evaluated: the proliferation index and the percentage of dividing cells. The first represents the mean of divisions that dividing cells underwent during the assay, which showed no difference among groups. In turn, the percentage of dividing cells among groups during the experiment showed statistical differences, being higher in splenocytes from the EXE group. Altogether, this data suggests that cells from EXE group are not more efficient at dividing once they have been activated but that more cells in proportion from EXE group are prone to proliferate once they have been exposed to PMA and ionomycine. These results made us wonder if this trend would be persistent in basal conditions, so we compared the percentage of proliferation in splenocytes among the experimental groups without activation by PMA and ionomycine and the statistical analysis showed no difference among them, reflecting a response produced by activation and not an anomaly that could reflect an inflammatory state that in turn could favor an autoimmune response. Thereafter, we evaluated the percentage of dividing cells from specific subpopulations, T helper cells, cytotoxic T cells, B lymphocytes and NK cells, showing an increase in the percentage of dividing cells in the last two subpopulations by effect of exercise. On the other hand, statistical analysis from the cytotoxicity test did not show variation among the experimental groups in any of the target/effector cell ratios tested, so data provided from this experiment does not suggest a higher cytotoxic activity from NK cells as a consequence from exercise. Nonetheless, exercise enhances the amount of NK cells that proliferate, which may indicate a higher immune-surveillance against transformed and virally infected cells in chronically exercised subjects.

Even though we found a decrease in major lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4+ and CD45 RA+ cells), which has been reported before for other immune cells in long term exercised individuals [32,3840], we also determined that a bigger proportion of splenocytes is prone to activate when stimulated, plus other functions of splenocytes from the EXE animals were not impaired. Given the fact that long-term exercised subjects do not report any kind of immune suppression, we have come to hypothesize that the decrease in the composition of some cell subpopulations may represent a more efficient IS, which requires less elements but presents a stronger reaction when needed. This idea is also supported by the results shown by the ELISA test, which showed that levels of IgG did not change among the groups, even though the subpopulation of B lymphocytes is decreased in EXE animals.

Finally, recent works have denominated the endocannabinoid system (ECS) as an immunomodulatory system; inhibiting the function of highly reactive and pro-inflammatory cells [25,41,42]. The ECS exerts its functions through the activation of its receptors, which expression vary greatly depending on cell subpopulation, activation or inflammatory status [24,41,43,44], being increased in the surface of more reactive cells. In this work we demonstrated that CE promotes changes in the expression of both CBR’s in splenocytes, through the staining of each receptor on different cell suspension aliquots and due to the shared epitope for the secondary antibody. Our findings concur with previous works showing that during moderate exercise bouts there is an increase of circulating ECS agonists [18,19]. We must emphasize that changes in CBR’s expression remained after one skipped day of training, which suggests that subjects exercising on a daily basis or in intervals of every two days might be maintaining this alterations. Our methodology allowed us to determine differences in the expression of CBR among cell subpopulations even between control groups. These differences might be explained by the intrinsic variability among cell subpopulations [21,45]. We also assessed an increased expression of CB1 receptor in the subpopulations of T helper and Tγδ lymphocytes and an increase in the expression of CB2 receptor in B lymphocytes of exercised animals. Therefore enhanced expression of CB1 in T helper, Tγδ, and CB2 in B lymphocytes could represent a mechanism to down regulate the activity of these probable high metabolic cells from EXE animals, as reflected by the proliferation tests. Some of these data differ from anterior reports concerning expression of CBR, nonetheless most of those reports used different techniques and did not measure the protein conforming CBR’s but mostly mRNA [21,46,47], which highlights the novelty of the data presented in this work, by showing a direct measure of the expressed protein in question under this particularly conditions of exercise. On the same line, the increased expression of CBR in splenocytes, particularly in lymphocytes from the EXE group, concurs with previous data reporting changes in the expression of the protein through the assessment by different techniques, like western blot and immunofluorescense [21,48,49], adding validity to our results.

We would like to address those changes presented on this work that can not be attributable to CE, like the composition of cytotoxic T cells for which TC and EXE groups differ when compared against SED group, reflecting an effect relying probably on the stress produced by the placement of the animals inside the treadmill, being that, the one thing that those groups had in common. The same explanation seems plausible for the expression of CBR in NK and cytotoxic T cells. Nevertheless analysis of corticosterone did not showed significant difference among the experimental groups, different sensitivity to several molecules has been reported for the wide variety of cells from the IS, leaving the possibility of other molecular interactions that escaped our control and awareness.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Gating strategy for the flow cytometric analysis of rat spleen subpopulations and their expression of CB1 and CB2 receptors.

Single cell suspension was prepared and stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies to separate splenocyte subpopulations and to mark cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2). Data was analyzed with FlowJo software 8.7 for Mac. Lymphocytes were identified by their scatter properties (FSC-A x SSC-A plot). Splenocyte subpopulations were characterized by surface staining and gated for their quantity assessment. Subsequently each cellular subpopulation was analyzed for their expression of both cannabinoid receptors in their surface.

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Levels of IgG are not affected by chronic exercise.

The analysis of total IgG was assessed for every experimental group with the use of a direct semi-quantitative ELISA. Statistical analysis did not show any significant difference among the experimental groups: SED (shaded bar), TC (white bar) and EXE (Solid bar). P>0.05. ANOVA, p = 0.0676, n = 6.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Serum corticosterone concentration one day after the last exercising bout.

Data is shown as mean (ng/ml) +- SE for each group. There was no significant difference among group values in concentration of serum corticosterone. Groups analyzed: SED (shaded bar), TC (white bar) and EXE (Solid bar). When data was statistically analyzed (ANOVA, n = 6, p = 0.0473, Tukey’s) results show a significant difference among the experimental groups. Nonetheless, The post hoc analysis did not show any significant interaction among the experimental groups. Means of the groups: TC and EXE (102.6 and 96.5 ng/ml respectively) were notoriously higher than that of the SED group (46.8 ng/ml).

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank M.V.Z Claudia Rivera-Cerecedo and her animal facility staff for assisting in the breeding of experimental animals. We also thank Diana Millán-Aldaco and Marcela Palomero-Rivero for their technical support.

Salvador Valencia-Sánchez is a doctoral student from Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and received fellowship 223625 from CONACYT.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by IN-209719 Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) to JMM; Grant FC-2016-2125 from Fronteras en la Ciencia, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) to JMM; Grant IA202919 Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) to KENC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Santos RVT, Caperuto É C, Costa Rosa LFBP. Effects of acute exhaustive physical exercise upon glutamine metabolism of lymphocytes from trained rats. Life Sci. 2007;80(6):573–8. 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Freidenreich DJ, Volek JS. Immune responses to resistance exercise. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2012;18:8–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Freidenreich DJ, Volek JS. The Immune Response to Exercise [Internet]. Nutrition and Enhanced Sports Performance. Elsevier Inc.; 2013. 95–101 p. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780123964540000096 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol [Internet]. 2011. September 5;11(9):607–15. Available from: 10.1038/nri3041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ropelle ER, Flores MB, Cintra DE, Rocha GZ, Pauli JR, Morari J, et al. IL-6 and IL-10 anti-inflammatory activity links exercise to hypothalamic insulin and leptin sensitivity through IKKβ and ER stress inhibition. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(8):31–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 6.Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. The role of exercise and PGC1α in inflammation and chronic disease. 2008;454(7203):463–9. 10.1038/nature07206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.GROUP DPPR. Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2002. February 7;346(6):393–403. Available from: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gustafson MP, DiCostanzo AC, Wheatley CM, Kim CH, Bornschlegl S, Gastineau DA, et al. A systems biology approach to investigating the influence of exercise and fitness on the composition of leukocytes in peripheral blood. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.LaVoy EC, Hussain M, Reed J, Kunz H, Pistillo M, Bigley AB, et al. T‐cell redeployment and intracellular cytokine expression following exercise: effects of exercise intensity and cytomegalovirus infection. Physiol Rep [Internet]. 2017;5(1):e13070 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087817%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC5256156%5Cnhttp://physreports.physiology.org/lookup/doi/10.14814/phy2.13070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pedersen BK, Hoffman-goetz L. Exercise and the Immune System: Regulation, Integration, and Adaptation. Society. 2000;80(3):1055–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sugiura H, Sugiura H, Nishida H, Inaba R, Mirbod SM, Iwata H. Effects of different durations of exercise on macrophage functions in mice Effects of different durations of exercise on macrophage functions in mice. J Appl Physiol. 2001;789–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Campbell JP, Turner JE, Campbell JP, Turner JE. Debunking the Myth of Exercise- Induced Immune Suppression: Redefining the Impact of Exercise on Immunological Health Across the Lifespan. 2018;9(April):1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lancaster G, Halson S, Khan Q, Drysadale P, Wallace F, Jeukendrup AE, et al. Effects of acute exhaustive exercise and chronic exercise training on type 1 and type 2 T lymphocytes. Exerc Immunol Rev [Internet]. 2004;10:91–104. Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/8096824_Effects_of_acute_exhaustive_exercise_and_chronic_exercise_training_on_type_1_and_type_2_T_lymphocytes/file/79e4150c59a6b1619f.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang J, Song H, Tang X, Yang Y, Vieira VJ, Niu Y, et al. Effect of exercise training intensity on murine T-regulatory cells and vaccination response. Scand J Med Sci Sports [Internet]. 2012. October [cited 2012 Oct 10];22(5):643–52. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21410542 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01288.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palmer CS, Cherry CL, Sada-Ovalle I, Singh A, Crowe SM. Glucose Metabolism in T Cells and Monocytes: New Perspectives in HIV Pathogenesis. EBioMedicine [Internet]. 2016. April;6:31–41. Available from: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palmer CS, Ostrowski M, Balderson B, Christian N, Crowe SM. Glucose metabolism regulates T cell activation, differentiation, and functions. Front Immunol. 2015;6(JAN):1–6. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Padgett D a. Glaser R. How stress influences the immune response. Trends Immunol. 2003;24(8):444–8. 10.1016/s1471-4906(03)00173-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sparling PB, Giuffrida a, Piomelli D, Rosskopf L, Dietrich a. Exercise activates the endocannabinoid system. Neuroreport [Internet]. 2003. December 2 [cited 2012 Aug 22];14(17):2209–11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14625449 10.1097/00001756-200312020-00015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heyman E, Gamelin F, Goekint M, Piscitelli F, Roelands B, Leclair E, et al. Intense exercise increases circulating endocannabinoid and BDNF levels in humans–—Possible implications for reward and depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37:844–51. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Galdino G, Romero TRL, Silva JFP, Aguiar DC, De Paula AM, Cruz JS, et al. The endocannabinoid system mediates aerobic exercise-induced antinociception in rats. Neuropharmacology [Internet]. 2014;77:313–24. Available from: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Galiègue S, Mary S, Marchand J, Dussossoy D, Carrikre D, Camyon P, et al. Expression of central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in human immune tissues and leukocyte subpopulations. Eur J Biochem. 1995;61(232):54–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Klein TW, Newton C, Friedman H. Cannabinoid receptors and immunity. Immunol Today [Internet]. 1998. August;19(8):373–81. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21873455 10.1016/s0167-5699(98)01300-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tanasescu R, Constantinescu CS. Cannabinoids and the immune system: an overview. Immunobiology [Internet]. 2010. August [cited 2012 Jul 23];215(8):588–97. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20153077 10.1016/j.imbio.2009.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cencioni MT, Chiurchiù V, Catanzaro G, Borsellino G, Bernardi G, Battistini L, et al. Anandamide suppresses proliferation and cytokine release from primary human T-lymphocytes mainly via CB2 receptors. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):2–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malek N, Popiolek-Barczyk K, Mika J, Przewlocka B, Starowicz K. Anandamide, acting via CB2 receptors, alleviates LPS-induced neuroinflammation in rat primary microglial cultures. Neural Plast. 2015;2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pilis W., Zarzezny R., Langfort J., Kactuba-Uscitko H., Nazar K., Wojtyna J. Anaerobic treshold in rats. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1993;(106):285–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carvalho JF, Masuda MO, Pompeu FAMS. Method for diagnosis and control of aerobic training in rats based on lactate threshold. 2005;140:409–13. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Radom-Aizik S, Zaldivar F, Haddad F, Cooper DM. Impact of brief exercise on peripheral blood NK cell gene and microRNA expression in young adults. J Appl Physiol [Internet]. 2013;114(5):628–36. Available from: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01341.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Murphy E a, Davis JM, Brown a S, Carmichael MD, Van Rooijen N, Ghaffar a, et al. Role of lung macrophages on susceptibility to respiratory infection following short-term moderate exercise training. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol [Internet]. 2004;287(6):R1354–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15308485 10.1152/ajpregu.00274.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Syu G-D, Chen H-I, Jen CJ. Differential effects of acute and chronic exercise on human neutrophil functions. Med Sci Sports Exerc [Internet]. 2012;44(6):1021–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22130467 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182408639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sugiura H, Sugiura H, Nishida H, Inaba R, Mirbod SM, Iwata H. Effects of different durations of exercise on macrophage functions in mice Effects of different durations of exercise on macrophage functions in mice. J Appl Physiol. 2012;789–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Saito Y, Kusaka Y, Shimada M. Effects of exercise intensity on circulating leukocyte subpopulations. Environ Health Prev Med [Internet]. 2003;8(1):18–22. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2723261&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract 10.1007/BF02897939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Davis JM, Murphy E a, Brown a S, Carmichael MD, Ghaffar a, Mayer EP. Effects of moderate exercise and oat beta-glucan on innate immune function and susceptibility to respiratory infection. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004;286(2):R366–72. 10.1152/ajpregu.00304.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Slusher AL, Zúñiga TM, Acevedo EO. Maximal Exercise Alters the Inflammatory Phenotype and Response of Mononuclear Cells [Internet]. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2017. 1 p. Available from: http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00005768-900000000-97070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Matthews CE, Ockene IR a S, Freedson PS, Rosal MC, Merriam P a, Hebert JR. Moderate to vigorous physical activity and risk of upper-repiratory tract infection. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2002;34(8):1242–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Parsons LM, Denton D, Egan G, Mckinley M, Shade R, Lancaster J, et al. Neuroimaging evidence implicating cerebellum in support of sensorycognitive processes associated with thirst. 2000;97(5). 10.1073/pnas.040555497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.MacKinnon LT. Special feature for the Olympics: effects of exercise on the immune system: overtraining effects on immunity and performance in athletes. Immunol Cell Biol [Internet]. 2000. October;78(5):502–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11050533 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2000.t01-7-.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Córdova A, Sureda A, Tur JA, Pons A. Immune response to exercise in elite sportsmen during the competitive season. J Physiol Biochem [Internet]. 2010. March 29;66(1):1–6. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13105-010-0001-2 10.1007/s13105-010-0001-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lin YS, Jan MS, Chen HI. The effect of chronic and acute exercise on immunity in rats. / Effet de l ‘ exercice chronique et aigu sur l ‘ immunite chez des rats. Int J Sports Med [Internet]. 1993;14(2):86–92. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sph&AN=SPH360924&site=ehost-live 10.1055/s-2007-1021151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Blannin a K, Chatwin LJ, Cave R, Gleeson M. Effects of submaximal cycling and long-term endurance training on neutrophil phagocytic activity in middle aged men. Br J Sports Med [Internet]. 1996. June 1;30(2):125–9. Available from: http://bjsm.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bjsm.30.2.125%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1332375&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract 10.1136/bjsm.30.2.125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chiurchiu V, Battistini L, Maccarrone M. Endocannabinoid signalling in innate and adaptive immunity. Immunology. 2015;144(3):352–64. 10.1111/imm.12441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Greineisen WE, Turner H. Immunoactive effects of cannabinoids: considerations for the therapeutic use of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists. Int Immunopharmacol [Internet]. 2010. May [cited 2013 Mar 7];10(5):547–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20219697 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Galgglje S, Mary S, Marchand J, Dussossoy D, Carrikre D, Camyon P, et al. Expression of central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in human immune tissues and leukocyte subpopulations. Signals. 1995;61:54–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bouaboula M, Rinaldi M, Carayon P, Carillon C, Delpech B, Shire D, et al. Cannabinoid-receptor expression in human leukocytes. Eur J Biochem [Internet]. 1993;214(1):173–80. Available from: http://content.febsjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/214/1/173%5Cnhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17910.x/full%5Cnhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8508790%5Cnhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubM 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17910.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Graham ES, Angel CE, Schwarcz LE, Dunbar PR, Glass M. Detailed characterisation of CB2 receptor protein expression in peripheral blood immune cells from healthy human volunteers using flow cytometry. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010;23(1):25–34. 10.1177/039463201002300103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee SF, Newton C, Widen R, Friedman H, Klein TW. Differential expression of cannabinoid CB 2 receptor mRNA in mouse immune cell subpopulations and following B cell stimulation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;235–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Noe SN, Newton C, Widen R, Friedman H, Klein TW. Anti-CD40, anti-CD3, and IL-2 stimulation induce contrasting changes in CB1 mRNA expression in mouse splenocytes. 2000;110:161–7. 10.1016/s0165-5728(00)00349-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Amancio-Belmont O, Becerril Meléndez AL, Ruiz-Contreras AE, Méndez-Díaz M, Prospéro-García O. Opposed cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) expression in the prefrontal cortex vs. nucleus accumbens is associated with alcohol consumption in male rats. Brain Res [Internet]. 2019;1725(September):146485 Available from: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Piszcz J a, Lemancewicz D, Kloczko J, Dzieciol J, Rusak M, Dabrowska M. Cannabinoid receptors expression in bone marrow trephine biopsy of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients treated with purine analogues. Exp Oncol [Internet]. 2007. September;29(3):221–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18004250 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Junpeng Wang

29 Aug 2019

PONE-D-19-20066

Cellular innate and adaptive immunity are affected by chronic exercise: implication of the cannabinergic system

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Morales-Montor,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Oct 13 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Junpeng Wang, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information on the animal research and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

This work was supported by Grant IN-209719 and Grant IA 202919 , both from Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM); to JMM and KENC, respectively. Grant FC-2016-2125 from Fronteras en la Ciencia, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), also to JMM. Margarita I Palacios-Arreola is a Posdoctoral fellowship from DGAPA, UNAM. We also receive funding from Fideicomiso: bases de colaboración “Transplantes al cerebro” to René Drucker Colín. In addition, Salvador Valencia- Sánchez received a complementary scholarship from Fondo de Estudios e Investigaciones Ricardo J. Zevada, to complete the final stages of this study. Salvador Valencia-Sánchez is a doctoral student from Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and received fellowship 223625 from CONACYT.

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

JMM IN-209719 Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

JMM Grant FC-2016-2125 from Fronteras en la Ciencia, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

KENC IA202919

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Partly

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Comments to the Author:

The authors examined the effect of chronic treadmill exercise on cells of the immune system and cannabinoid receptors in male rats. These results suggested that chronic exercise can be recommended because it has beneficial effects on cellular innate and adaptive immunity. This paper is interesting to a wider audience across disciplines as immune systems and cannabinergic system. The authors suggest that the results contribute to the understanding of the benefits of exercise on the generally healthy person. Although these research approaches are interesting, to suggest the contribution to health there are several points that need to be clarified.

1. As basically data, it has need to show weight change in effect of Citrate Synthase activity (CS activity) of gastrocnemius muscle and/or weight changes about chronic treadmill exercise in rats. Because, in this experiment, it was conducted a chronic exercise at the vivo level, it needs information about training effect is necessary.

2. I would like to recommend that the authors need to observe the chronic exercise changes in cytokine production associated with the immunomodulation and inflammation about the functions of the other organs or tissues, immune cells.

3. For example, what about the effects of CRH by chronic training? In addition, it is necessary to add the data as to whether CRH changes by chronic training. Because the relationship between the changes in the immune system on exercise training is the effects of the relationship between the metabolic system, autonomic nervous system and endocrine system too. In particular, the exercise-induced cannabinoid is also involved in the central nerve, so it is thought that it is difficult to suggest health effects solely from the response of immunocyte and only receptor expression. Although I have no doubt about the quality of the presented work, I recommend revising the manuscript so that the purpose appears more clearly.

4. I would like to recommend that the authors demonstrate to investigate the immunocyte functional effect of chronic exercise by cannabinoid receptor antagonist, virodhamine administration.

Minor comments:

1. P4,L4: “physycal activity” = “physical activity”

Reviewer #2: I have reviewed the Ms entitled "Cellular innate and adaptive immunity are affected by chronic exercise: implication of the cannabinergic system " by Valencia-Sánchez et al.

Authors assessed the effect of chronic exercise on imune cells from innate and adaptative immunity. The study is interesting, however it needs some adjustments.

1- The title of the manuscript is very long. The authors should summarize it.

2- In abstract the authors indicate that the exercise produced 'an alteration in the cannabinoid receptors expression'. This feels could be better specified in increase or decrease.

1- At the end of the introduction the authors describe many about the results. This can be replaced only by the hypothesis and purpose of the study.

2- The introduction makes it unclear whether exercise activates or inhibits the immune system and whether this has any clinical implications. Has this effect of exercise been investigated in any pathology? It would be interesting to describe in the introduction.

3- In methods, it would be interesting to describe the weight of the animals at the end of the tenth week.

4- Was there an electrical stimulus on the treadmill to encourage the animals to run? Usually in these protocols there is an electrical stimulus. In this case, the animals Treadmill control group received the same average stimuli Exercised animals? Can this stimulus influence the immune response?

5- Does the exercise intensity at the end of the tenth week equate to light, moderate or heavy exercise? The type of intensity can directly influence the results and it is important to describe this sentence in the text.

6- Authors should describe exercise protocol in a table.

7- on page 149 delete a comma.

8- On page 173, were the animals sacrificed 1 or 2 days after the end of the exercise?

9- On page 343 the authors describe "medium intensity resistance exercise". Would it be a resistance or aerobic exercise? How do the authors know that indensity is medium?

10- On page 350 delete the word "that" before "underwent".

11- Authors should discuss and investigate clinical studies of the effect on reducing the anti-inflammatory immune response.

12- On page 396 change "endo-cannabinoid" to endocannabinoid.

13- As the authors could explain the increased expression of CB1 receptors in same cells investigated, whereas CB2 receptors are expressed in most immune system?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Manuscript ID PONE-D-19-20066-peer review.docx

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 18;14(11):e0220542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220542.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


23 Sep 2019

Reviewer #1: Comments to the Author:

Q. The authors examined the effect of chronic treadmill exercise on cells of the immune system and cannabinoid receptors in male rats. These results suggested that chronic exercise can be recommended because it has beneficial effects on cellular innate and adaptive immunity. This paper is interesting to a wider audience across disciplines as immune systems and cannabinergic system. The authors suggest that the results contribute to the understanding of the benefits of exercise on the generally healthy person. Although these research approaches are interesting, to suggest the contribution to health there are several points that need to be clarified.

A. Thank you for your comment. We have incorporated all suggestions/comments, were appropiate on the new draft of the manuscript.

Q. As basically data, it has need to show weight change in effect of Citrate Synthase activity (CS activity) of gastrocnemius muscle and/or weight changes about chronic treadmill exercise in rats. Because, in this experiment, it was conducted a chronic exercise at the vivo level, it needs information about training effect is necessary.

A. Thank you for your remark. However, with all due respect, we do not agree with this comment. The weight data it is included, and animals showed a less gain of weight than controls, with no change in food and water intake. Moreover, as the experiments were conducted on an strict protocol, and, under aproval of the Ethics Comitte of our Institution, a new protocol would have to be submitted to asses your concern, that, surely would be denied if the idea it is only to measure this enzyme activity. Unafortunately we do not include to measure this in our original protocol. The training effect that we search for, it is on immune system components, and, in the search of exercise literatura, most of the mapapers reviewed, did not include this enzyme activity like the proof of chronic exercise activity. That it is the main reason not to included it. .Furthermore, the senior author of this manuscript, Dr Drucker, passed away, and, the PhD student in charge of the research (Salvador Valencia), has not grant to perform new experiments. It is not my research line, so, it is practically imposible to perform new experiments. This would be the paper to be published by SV to obtain his PhD. Finally, since the training effect that we search for, it is on immune system components, and, the animals were quite fit (they did not gain weight as the controls), we did not search for proof of exercise at the metabolic level, which by the way, it is a different question.

Q. I would like to recommend that the authors need to observe the chronic exercise changes in cytokine production associated with the immunomodulation and inflammation about the functions of the other organs or tissues, immune cells

A. I would like to remark, that, cytokines are molecules that indeed give a clue of specific immune cell activatiòn. However, in my experience, cytokines are molecules that are sinthetized and secreted by immune cwells in response to specific immune activation. This is it, in response to an antigenic challenge. Moreover, even if that happens, the cytokine produced most of the times are only in the compartment of the immune system activation (for instance, if a tumor, in the tumor microenvironment, ora n intestinal parasite, in the intestine). As for your suggestion, were would us will have to search for cytokines? In the serum? In the spleen? In the brain? In the muscle? Again, we have many data, in hundreds of animals, in which, cytokines do not change at systemic level, but in the site of the immune confrontation. As a matter of fact, we did both preliminary experiments searching for pro-inflamatory cytokines in serum, and in the spleen, and, since results did not showed any change, we did not pursued it any more. But, since it were only 3 animals, ww cannot include that information, it is incomplete. And, for new experiments, same argument that in the upper comment apllies, it is imposible to perform new experiments. However, we believe that the present communication stands by it self with no need of new experiments.

Q. For example, what about the effects of CRH by chronic training? In addition, it is necessary to add the data as to whether CRH changes by chronic training. Because the relationship between the changes in the immune system on exercise training is the effects of the relationship between the metabolic system, autonomic nervous system and endocrine system too. In particular, the exercise-induced cannabinoid is also involved in the central nerve, so it is thought that it is difficult to suggest health effects solely from the response of immunocyte and only receptor expression. Although I have no doubt about the quality of the presented work, I recommend revising the manuscript so that the purpose appears more clearly.

A. We are very aware of the stress effect. That it is the reason to measure corticosterone. Since cortiosterone secretion it is regulated by the hyphotalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and, the mechanism of production of hormones is by up or down regulation, and, because we did not found changes in corticosterone level, we did not search for CRH or ACTH.And, I do not follow what do you mean with the purpose appears more cleraly, right after the CRH suggestion. I beleieve, again, that our aim, and way to demostrate our hypothesis it is right, and, there is no need to include or pursue CRH changes. Again, and, most importantly, that it would be only if chnges in corticosterone would have been found, but, as it is no change, there is no need to search for CRH or ACTH changes, because the mechanism of corticosterone production it is by up or down regulation: a decrease in corticosterone, would induce and increase in CRH and ACTH, and an increase, would produce a decrease in CRH and ACTH. If the concern it is the centrl nervous system, the molecules to search are either endrphins or adrenaluine and noradrenaline, that are more related to excercise effects. Those data we are analyzing now, but, may be to expose in another communication.

Q. I would like to recommend that the authors demonstrate to investigate the immunocyte functional effect of chronic exercise by cannabinoid receptor antagonist, virodhamine administration.

A. That suggestion it is well taken, but, we believe again, that, it it not necessary in the present set of expermients. As much of the scientific communications, not all the mechanisms are explored in the same piece of work. And, unafortunately, I have to remark the comment made in the first of your concerns: we cannot perfomr new experiments.

Minor comments:

Q. P4,L4: “physycal activity” = “physical activity”

A. It has been corrected as suggested

Reviewer #2: Comments to the Author:

I have reviewed the Ms entitled "Cellular innate and adaptive immunity are affected by chronic exercise: implication of the cannabinergic system " by Valencia-Sánchez et al. Authors assessed the effect of chronic exercise on imune cells from innate and adaptative immunity. The study is interesting, however it needs some adjustments.

Q- The title of the manuscript is very long. The authors should summarize it.

A. It has been corrected as suggested.

Q- In abstract the authors indicate that the exercise produced 'an alteration in the cannabinoid receptors expression'. This feels could be better specified in increase or decrease.

A. It has been corrected as suggested

Q. At the end of the introduction the authors describe many about the results. This can be replaced only by the hypothesis and purpose of the study.

A- It has been corrected as suggested

Q- The introduction makes it unclear whether exercise activates or inhibits the immune system and whether this has any clinical implications. Has this effect of exercise been investigated in any pathology? It would be interesting to describe in the introduction.

A. Thank you for your comment. Indeed, that it is the whole point of our manuscript. Nothing has been done in regards to chronic exercise, and immune activation, much less in any disease. That it is the reason we do not specifically use manuscripts related to that.

Q- In methods, it would be interesting to describe the weight of the animals at the end of the tenth week.

A. That information has been included in the result section

Q- Was there an electrical stimulus on the treadmill to encourage the animals to run? Usually in these protocols there is an electrical stimulus. In this case, the animals Treadmill control group received the same average stimuli Exercised animals? Can this stimulus influence the immune response?

A. There is not electrical stimulus. You are absolutely right in your comment. But, in our experiments, rats that were included in the chronic exercise group were those that willingly entered to the treadmill. We also though about describe those as the “bold rats”, compared to the ones that, didi not wanted to get in. As a matter of fact, we keept the brains, the muscle, the serums, and, right now are searching for neurotranmitters, cathecolamines, andocanabioniods and, cytokines, to, explain the “bold effect” as well as molecularmechanisms associated to exercise.

Q- Does the exercise intensity at the end of the tenth week equate to light, moderate or heavy exercise? The type of intensity can directly influence the results and it is important to describe this sentence in the text.

A. It has been clarified in the text as suggested

Q- Authors should describe exercise protocol in a table.

A. It has been corrected as suggested

Q- on page 149 delete a comma.

A. It has been corrected as suggested

Q- On page 173, were the animals sacrificed 1 or 2 days after the end of the exercise?

A. It has been corrected as suggested, making it clear in the text. The animals were sacrificed right afeter the last test

Q- On page 343 the authors describe "medium intensity resistance exercise". Would it be a resistance or aerobic exercise? How do the authors know that indensity is medium?

A. Thank you. It has been clarifiedin the text

Q- On page 350 delete the word "that" before "underwent"

A. It has been corrected as suggested

Q.- Authors should discuss and investigate clinical studies of the effect on reducing the anti-inflammatory immune response

A. Thank you. That it is indeed the second phase of our studies. To include an antigenic challenge to search if, immune system activity is boosted or compromized in response to chronic exercise. In regards to clinic studies, it i suite hard, since only epidemiologic and correlative studies can be made, but, we will try out to partner to Hospitals and clinics to search that.

Q.- On page 396 change "endo-cannabinoid" to endocannabinoid.

A. It has been corrected as suggested

Q- As the authors could explain the increased expression of CB1 receptors in same cells investigated, whereas CB2 receptors are expressed in most immune system?

A. That it is a hard question to answer. However, it has been widely suggested that CB1 type receptors, are expresed more in endocrine related tisuues, while, CB2, in other cell types, including immune cells. However, most of the studies on cannabinod receptiors are done either by western blott or immunocitochemistry, while we use flow cytometry (which it is more much reliable and accurate, since the expression it is at cell level)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Junpeng Wang

16 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-20066R1

Cellular innate and adaptive immunity are affected by chronic exercise

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Morales-Montor,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Nov 30 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Junpeng Wang, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: 1- The authors have summarized the title, but the main tissue (endocannabinoid system) was excluded.

2- Ok!

3- At the end of the introduction the authors describe hypothesis, as suggested, but now the study objectives are omitted.

4- When asked the authors whether exercise activates or inhibits the immune system for the purpose of describing in the introduction, they replied that there is no study, but I suggest checking the review and describing any study addressed by it (10.3389/fimmu.2018.00648).

5- About weight of the animals, its ok!

6- About electrical stimulus, its ok!

7- The table 1 figure legend need to describe each abbreviation. Ok about requested table 1.

8- The last question about cb2 receivers should be included in the discussion. It is important to note that the results of the literature on western blot receptor-enhanced cb2 receptors and immunofluorescence are relevant and cannot be lowered compared to cytometry, even though cytometry has good accuracy.

Reviewer #3: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of chronic treadmill exercise on lymphocytes, NK cells and macrophages of male rats investigating possible alterations of cannabinoid receptors in this process. The study is very interesting and important to better understanding of chronic exercise in immune cells. However, there are some minor points that need to be addressed.

1. The title need to be changed to indicate the important effects on cannabinoids receptors.

2. The purpose of the study and the main hypothesis is not clear in the abstract.

3. The identification of CD11b is sufficiently to identify macrophages?

4. The figures quality need to be improved.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 18;14(11):e0220542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220542.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


31 Oct 2019

Reviewer #2:

1- The authors have summarized the title, but the main tissue (endocannabinoid system) was excluded.

Reply: Thank you for the observation, the title has now been changed to “Chronic exercise modulates the cellular immunity and its cannabinoid receptors expression”, including the cannabinoid system in the title once again.

2- Ok!

3- At the end of the introduction the authors describe hypothesis, as suggested, but now the study objectives are omitted.

Reply: We had already included the objectives of our work before the hypotesis. nontheless, in order to make it clearer we have changed it to:

“Altogether, The objective of our study is to explore the long-term changes that chronic exercise (CE) produces in the proportion of splenocytes from the adaptive and innate immunity, and to assess the effects that it has on their function (by performing proliferation tests and cytotoxicity test with total splenocytes in vitro), and finally to determine if the expression of CBR in these cells is affected by this model of exercise.”

4- When asked the authors whether exercise activates or inhibits the immune system for the purpose of describing in the introduction, they replied that there is no study, but I suggest checking the review and describing any study addressed by it (10.3389/fimmu.2018.00648).

Reply: we added recent information envolving the interaction between exercise, metabolic deseases and cancer, this published data even suggest its use as an alternative therapy. This addition can be found at the end of the first paraghaph of the introduction as previously requested.

About the interesting review suggested, some lines have been added on the introduction making reference to this work and its take homme message about a new interpretation of older data, and the implications it has on the understanding of the beneficial physiological changes that the organisms undoergoes during the physical activity.

5- About weight of the animals, its ok!

6- About electrical stimulus, its ok!

7- The table 1 figure legend need to describe each abbreviation. Ok about requested table 1.

Reply: the abbreviations have been added.

8- The last question about cb2 receivers should be included in the discussion. It is important to note that the results of the literature on western blot receptor-enhanced cb2 receptors and immunofluorescence are relevant and cannot be lowered compared to cytometry, even though cytometry has good accuracy.

Reply: According to the question previously made, we have added a couple of lines in the cannabinoid receptors section (in the dicussion), where we explain the need for a double and independent staining for every cell suspention aliquot in order to assess the exprssion of each CBR due to the shared epitope for the secondary antibody.

We have also added some references to previous data regarding the assesment of CBr through different techniques, like western blot and ummunohistochemestry, highlighting our position with respect to the validity of such techniques and the information they provide.

Reviewer #3: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of chronic treadmill exercise on lymphocytes, NK cells and macrophages of male rats investigating possible alterations of cannabinoid receptors in this process. The study is very interesting and important to better understanding of chronic exercise in immune cells. However, there are some minor points that need to be addressed.

1. The title need to be changed to indicate the important effects on cannabinoids receptors.

Reply: Thanks for the observation, we have includded the cannabinoid receptors on the title.

2. The purpose of the study and the main hypothesis is not clear in the abstract.

Reply: the objectves and hypohesis have been added as requested.

3. The identification of CD11b is sufficiently to identify macrophages?

Reply: This is an important observation.

The expression of CD11b is not exclusive of macrophages, it is shared among different cells with myeloid origin, but once we restrict their identification to big and coplex cells, we obtain a reasonably adecuate identification of this cell subset.

This aclaration has been added in the section of “Materials and methods” and the subsection “Flow Cytometry”.

4. The figures quality need to be improved.

Reply: the images lost quality when converted to .tiff the first time, making some lines disapear or blurry. That has been fixed. Now they have been converted to eps. format which alowed us to improve the resolution to 500 dpis, whitout exceeding the 10mb limit for the upload.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebbutal Letter .docx

Decision Letter 2

Junpeng Wang

4 Nov 2019

Chronic exercise modulates the cellular immunity and its cannabinoid receptors expression

PONE-D-19-20066R2

Dear Dr. Morales-Montor,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Junpeng Wang, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Junpeng Wang

11 Nov 2019

PONE-D-19-20066R2

Chronic exercise modulates the cellular immunity and its cannabinoid receptors expression

Dear Dr. Morales-Montor:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Junpeng Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Gating strategy for the flow cytometric analysis of rat spleen subpopulations and their expression of CB1 and CB2 receptors.

    Single cell suspension was prepared and stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies to separate splenocyte subpopulations and to mark cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2). Data was analyzed with FlowJo software 8.7 for Mac. Lymphocytes were identified by their scatter properties (FSC-A x SSC-A plot). Splenocyte subpopulations were characterized by surface staining and gated for their quantity assessment. Subsequently each cellular subpopulation was analyzed for their expression of both cannabinoid receptors in their surface.

    (TIFF)

    S2 Fig. Levels of IgG are not affected by chronic exercise.

    The analysis of total IgG was assessed for every experimental group with the use of a direct semi-quantitative ELISA. Statistical analysis did not show any significant difference among the experimental groups: SED (shaded bar), TC (white bar) and EXE (Solid bar). P>0.05. ANOVA, p = 0.0676, n = 6.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Serum corticosterone concentration one day after the last exercising bout.

    Data is shown as mean (ng/ml) +- SE for each group. There was no significant difference among group values in concentration of serum corticosterone. Groups analyzed: SED (shaded bar), TC (white bar) and EXE (Solid bar). When data was statistically analyzed (ANOVA, n = 6, p = 0.0473, Tukey’s) results show a significant difference among the experimental groups. Nonetheless, The post hoc analysis did not show any significant interaction among the experimental groups. Means of the groups: TC and EXE (102.6 and 96.5 ng/ml respectively) were notoriously higher than that of the SED group (46.8 ng/ml).

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Manuscript ID PONE-D-19-20066-peer review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebbutal Letter .docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES