Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2019 Nov 18;10:5216. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13021-8

Quorum sensing modulates the formation of virulent Legionella persisters within infected cells

Nicolas Personnic 1,, Bianca Striednig 1, Emmanuelle Lezan 2, Christian Manske 3, Amanda Welin 1, Alexander Schmidt 2, Hubert Hilbi 1
PMCID: PMC6861284  PMID: 31740681

Abstract

The facultative intracellular bacterium Legionella pneumophila replicates in environmental amoebae and in lung macrophages, and causes Legionnaires’ disease. Here we show that L. pneumophila reversibly forms replicating and nonreplicating subpopulations of similar size within amoebae. The nonreplicating bacteria are viable and metabolically active, display increased antibiotic tolerance and a distinct proteome, and show high virulence as well as the capacity to form a degradation-resistant compartment. Upon infection of naïve or interferon-γ-activated macrophages, the nonreplicating subpopulation comprises ca. 10% or 50%, respectively, of the total intracellular bacteria; hence, the nonreplicating subpopulation is of similar size in amoebae and activated macrophages. The numbers of nonreplicating bacteria within amoebae are reduced in the absence of the autoinducer synthase LqsA or other components of the Lqs quorum-sensing system. Our results indicate that virulent, antibiotic-tolerant subpopulations of L. pneumophila are formed during infection of evolutionarily distant phagocytes, in a process controlled by the Lqs system.

Subject terms: Antimicrobial resistance, Bacteria, Cellular microbiology, Pathogens


The pathogenic bacterium Legionella pneumophila infects lung macrophages and environmental amoebae. Here, Personnic et al. show that the pathogen reversibly forms virulent, antibiotic-tolerant subpopulations during infection of macrophages and amoebae, in a process regulated by the Lqs quorum-sensing system.

Introduction

Phenotypic heterogeneity within clonal bacterial populations is a wide-spread strategy to colonize and persist in fluctuating environments1. An aspect of phenotypic heterogeneity of major clinical importance is the stochastic or stress-induced production of nonreplicating “persisters”, which survive antibiotic exposure27, but have not been thoroughly studied physiologically. The emergence of antibiotic-tolerant persisters has been documented for several important bacterial pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica and Pseudomonas spp.8. The evolutionary origin of bacterial persistence and the extent to which this phenomenon is implicated in the ecology and environmental niches of pathogens remains unknown.

Legionella pneumophila is a ubiquitous environmental bacterium, which as an opportunistic pathogen can cause a severe pneumonia termed Legionnaires’ disease. L. pneumophila replicates in a diverse array of protozoan hosts that comprise multiple phyla as well as in mammalian lung macrophages912. L. pneumophila survives ingestion by phagocytic cells by establishing a replicative membrane-bound compartment termed the L. pneumophila-containing vacuole (LCV)13,14. L. pneumophila employs the Icm/Dot type IV secretion system (T4SS) to inject a plethora of effector proteins, which promote LCV formation and prevent the fusion of the pathogen compartment with bactericidal lysosomes1520. LCVs extensively communicate with the endosomal, secretory and retrograde vesicle trafficking pathways of the host cell and actively engage in the phosphoinositide (PI) lipid conversion from phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns(3)P) to PtdIns(4)P13,2125.

At a population level, L. pneumophila employs a bi-phasic lifestyle, comprising a replicative phase and a postexponential, “transmissive” phase during which the bacteria are virulent and motile26,27. The switch between the replicative and transmissive phase, as well as a number of other traits of L. pneumophila, is regulated by the Legionella quorum-sensing (Lqs) system28,29. Components of the Lqs system comprise the autoinducer synthase LqsA, which produces the α-hydroxyketone signaling molecule LAI-1 (Legionella autoinducer-1, 3-hydroxypentadecane-4-one)30, the membrane-bound sensor histidine kinases LqsS31 and LqsT32 and the prototypic response regulator LqsR33, which dimerizes upon phosphorylation34. The bi-phasic lifestyle of L. pneumophila and a potential role of the Lqs system for infection have not been studied at single cell level.

In this study, we investigate the phenotypic heterogeneity of L. pneumophila in evolutionarily distant professional phagocytes. Using single cell techniques, we identify intracellular L. pneumophila nonreplicating persisters and further characterize their physiology. We reveal that the nonreplicating persisters are highly infectious and modulate their host cells to form a protective LCV. The nonreplicating subpopulation is of similar size in amoebae and interferon-γ-activated macrophages, and is controlled by the Lqs system.

Results

Intracellular L. pneumophila shows growth rate heterogeneity

To explore whether a clonal population of L. pneumophila shows phenotypic heterogeneity within host cells, we investigated growth rate heterogeneity of single bacteria in their natural host, the free-living ameba Acanthamoeba castellanii. As a readout for the growth rate, we adapted for L. pneumophila the Timerbac system, a stable fluorescent reporter that slowly maturates from a green to a red fluorescent protein2. Timer production did not impair the bacterial growth in broth or A. castellanii (Supplementary Fig. 1a). In exponentially growing L. pneumophila constitutively producing Timer (L. pneumophila/Timer), green fluorescent Timer dominates over red fluorescent Timer, which is diluted by cell division before maturation, and the individual bacteria show a high green/red fluorescence (color) ratio [500 nm (green)/600 nm (red)] (Fig. 1a, 4 h, 8 h, and 12 h). By contrast, during the lag and stationary growth phases, L. pneumophila/Timer bacteria accumulate both green and red fluorescent Timer, and the individual bacteria show a low green/red color ratio (Fig. 1a, 2 h, and 24 h). Fluorescence ratios were robust in relation to cell-to-cell variations in protein content and cell size as indicated by the peaks’ narrowness (Fig. 1a). To experimentally link the Timer color ratios to the division rates, we immobilized L. pneumophila/Timer in AYE/0.5% agarose35, tracked growth over time by confocal microscopy, and measured the Timer color ratio at a single cell level (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). Thus, we could equate fluorescence ratios (R) and the division rates (μ) as follows [μ=0.1+Log10R2.6], independently of the growth temperatures used (25 or 37 °C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

L. pneumophila shows growth rate heterogeneity in infected amoebae. a Timer color ratio reflects the division rate at a single cell level. Stationary phase grown L. pneumophila/Timer was diluted in AYE broth and let grow for 24 h. At given time points, bacteria were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry. The Timer color ratio - Log10[500 nm (green)/600 nm (red)] - was calculated for individual bacteria. bd L. pneumophila intracellular growth rate heterogeneity. b Confocal microscopy of A. castellanii infected (MOI 1; 5, 24 h) with L. pneumophila/Timer wild-type (WT) or the isogenic avirulent ΔicmT/Timer strain. Micrographs show overlays of bright field and the Timer fluorescence (500 nm and 600 nm); growing and nongrowing bacteria appear green or red/orange, respectively. Magnifications: growth rate heterogeneity of L. pneumophila subpopulations (24 h p.i.) with different color ratios (R: Log10[green/red] color ratio) and the corresponding division rate (μ). Scale bars 10 μm. c Flow cytometry or d imaging flow cytometry of lysed infected A. castellanii shows growth rate heterogeneity of released intracellular bacteria. Black, whole population; red, nongrowers (NG); orange, slow-growers (GS); green, fast-growers (GF). gray, ΔicmT. BF, Bright field. e L. pneumophila forms a high percentage of nongrowers in infected Acanthamoebae. Quantification by flow cytometry of nongrowing L. pneumophila/Timer wild-type (WT) or ΔicmT/Timer in infected cell lysates (MOI 1; 5, 24 h). f Intracellular nongrowers produce Timer protein de novo. A. castellanii was infected (MOI 1, 24 h), L. pneumophila/Timer and immobilized in PYG/0.1% agarose. Photobleaching (PB) was set up using the FRAP-wizard algorithm of the Leica SP8 microscope. Regions of interest (ROI; dashed squares) were photobleached (100% 488 nm laser intensity, iteration 30×), and fluorescence recovery at 500 nm was recorded (every 10 min). Micrographs illustrate FRAP kinetics in inverted color for clarity. Scale bar 20 μm. Fluorescence recovery measurements shown for three nongrowers (yellow) and three growing bacterial clusters (green). Data represent the mean ± SEM of three biological replicates (n = 3; light gray filled circles). Student’s t test two-tailed, ***P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file

To assess intracellular growth rate heterogeneity, we infected A. castellanii with L. pneumophila/Timer and monitored the intracellular growth (Timer color ratio 500 nm/600 nm) at a single cell level by confocal microscopy. At 5 h post infection (p.i.), all L. pneumophila cells appeared red/orange (low green/red color ratio) indicating the absence of replication (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 2a and Supplementary Movie 1). At 24 h p.i., individual intracellular L. pneumophila showed various color ratios (R) (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 2a, Supplementary Movie 1) reflecting different intracellular bacterial division rates (Supplementary Fig. 1b) that ranged from growth arrest (NG, R ≈ −0.3, μ = 0.0 h−1) to slow growth (GS, R ≈ 0, μ ≈ 0.04 h−1) and fast growth (GF, R ≈ 0.3, μ ≈ 0.17 h−1). Bacteria with diverse growth rates were found in different amoebae as well as within the same host cell.

Flow cytometry analysis of lysates of A. castellanii infected for 24 h revealed the presence of fluorescent L. pneumophila/Timer subpopulations with even broader color ratios (Fig. 1c), the signal of which was specific and well separated from autofluorescent host cell debris (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Imaging flow cytometry analysis performed with lysates of infected amoebae confirmed the presence of L. pneumophila subpopulations with distinct Timer color ratio differences (Fig. 1d). Using the correlation between Timer fluorescence ratios and bacterial division rates defined by confocal microscopy analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1b), we estimated that intracellular L. pneumophila division rates ranged from 0 h−1 to a maximum of about 0.4 h−1 (Supplementary Fig. 2c). The average growth rate for the growing subpopulation was 0.17 ± 0.02 h−1, which represents a mean intracellular generation time of about 4 h.

Using the flow cytometry approach to quantify in a nonbiased manner the intracellular L. pneumophila populations, the nondividing subpopulation was surprisingly prominent, as it accounted for ~50% of all intracellular bacteria (Fig. 1e). Similar percentages of nondividing L. pneumophila/Timer subpopulations were obtained 24 h p.i., regardless of whether the inoculum comprised AYE-grown stationary phase L. pneumophila or bacteria “naturally” released from infected A. castellanii at the end of an infection cycle (Supplementary Fig. 2d). This result indicates that virulent L. pneumophila robustly forms a prominent (ca. 50%) subpopulation of nondividing bacteria upon infection of amoebae independently of the conditions previously encountered (broth or amoebae).

The L. pneumophila ΔicmT mutant strain lacks a functional Icm/Dot T4SS required to survive and replicate intracellularly in host cells36. Accordingly, the few ΔicmT bacteria surviving in amebae all showed a low green/red color ratio, indicating growth arrest (Fig. 1b–e, Supplementary Fig. 2c). By contrast the complemented strain ΔicmT(icmTS) efficiently grew intracellularly and developed growing and nongrowing subpopulations (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c). Together, these findings demonstrate an extensive growth rate range of individual intracellular L. pneumophila in infected amebae, which requires a functional Icm/Dot T4SS. Moreover, our results also indicate that intracellular nongrowing bacteria comprise a substantial subpopulation.

Intracellular nongrowers are viable and can resume growth

Next, we addressed the question of whether the intracellular L. pneumophila/Timer nongrowers are viable. Propidium iodide-based live/dead staining performed on lysates of A. castellanii infected with GFP-producing L. pneumophila indicated that, regardless of the growth rate, 95% of the intracellular bacteria were viable at 24 h p.i. (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Moreover, confocal microscopy, flow cytometry, and imaging flow cytometry suggested, at the single cell level, that the intracellular nongrowers kept producing the green fluorescent Timer protein (Fig. 1b–d, Supplementary Figs. 1b, 2a–c, 3a, b, and Supplementary Movie 1). To further investigate the Timer protein production, we conducted fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments, which indeed confirmed that intracellular nongrowers synthesize Timer protein de novo (Fig. 1f). To assess another hallmark of bacterial viability, the membrane potential, we labeled intracellular L. pneumophila with the fluorescent mitochondrial membrane potential probe MitoTracker. 24 h p.i., MitoTracker equally stained growing and nongrowing intracellular L. pneumophila/Timer subpopulations, revealing the presence of a membrane potential (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Collectively, the ongoing translational activity, active metabolism, and an intact membrane potential indicate that intracellular nongrowing L. pneumophila are viable.

We further determined the growth capacity of intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and compared flow cytometry counts with colony forming units (CFU) on agar plates. To this end, we FACS-sorted L. pneumophila/Timer in lysates of A. castellanii infected for 24 h according to the Timer color ratios (Figs. 2a, b, 1c, Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). Intracellular growers and nongrowers were subsequently plated and CFU were determined. The plating efficiency (CFU per sorted fluorescent bacteria) was rather low, yet similar for the nongrowers and the growers (Fig. 2c), revealing that the growth capacity of the subpopulations was identical. Moreover, similar growth of the subpopulations in presence of chloramphenicol was observed, indicating that the plasmid expressing timer was not lost. To rule out the possibility that the observed growth resumption on plates was caused by cross contamination during the FACS-sorting, we assessed the growth resumption of sorted nongrowers by re-infection experiments and time lapse confocal microscopy. The re-infection approach revealed that sorted nongrowers efficiently (~85%) resumed growth in A. castellanii (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Movie 2). We did not detect growth resumption of the sorted nongrowers upon immobilization in AYE/agarose, likely due to the low plating efficiency (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

L. pneumophila intracellular nongrowers are viable and persisters. a, b FACS-sorting of intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations. A. castellanii were infected with L. pneumophila/Timer (MOI 1, 24 h) and lysed. Released intracellular bacteria were FACS-sorted according to their Timer green/red color ratio, sorted subpopulations were reanalyzed by flow cytometry and compared with the initial infected cell lysate (pre-sort) to evaluate the separation efficiency. a Graph, (representative for four biological replicates) and b the quantification is shown. Pre-sort, black; growers, yellow; nongrowers, red. c Intracellular growers and nongrowers resume growth on CYE plates. To determine re-growth, FACS-sorted intracellular growing and nongrowing L. pneumophila/Timer subpopulations were plated on CYE or CYE/Cam plates and CFU were determined (plating efficiency: CFU*100/sorted fluorescent particles). d Growth rate heterogeneity is a reversible phenotypic trait. FACS-sorted intracellular growing and nongrowing L. pneumophila/Timer subpopulations were plated on CYE. Three colonies were harvested, grown to stationary phase in AYE broth and used to re-infect A. castellanii (MOI 1, 24 h). The size of the nongrowing population was determined by flow cytometry on infected cell lysates. e Ex vivo, nongrowers are more tolerant to antibiotic treatment. FACS-sorted growing and nongrowing L. pneumophila were treated (1 h) or not with the antibiotics ofloxacin (3 μg mL−1), erythromycin (3 μg mL−1) or gentamycin (20 μg mL−1), and the percentage of survivors was calculated as CFUtreated/CFUnontreated × 100. f Formation of L. pneumophila persisters in infected amoebae. After host cell lysis, bacteria were resuspended in AYE supplemented with erythromycin (60 μg mL−1; gray), ofloxacin (30 μg mL−1; black), or without antibiotic (red dots). Bacteria were incubated at 25 °C and plated at defined time points. The antibiotics caused bi-phasic kill curves, indicating the existence of persisters. Survivors of 50 h of antibiotic treatment were harvested from plates and showed similar kill curves in follow-up experiments (dashed-lines). Data represent the mean ± SEM of at least three biological replicates (n ≥ 3; light gray filled circles). Student’s t test two-tailed. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01. Source data are provided as a Source Data file

Finally, FACS-sorted growing and nongrowing isolates were first plated on agar plates and subsequently used to infect A. castellanii for 24 h. Under these conditions, the isolates passaged on agar plates developed similar percentages of growers and nongrowers in amoebae as determined by flow cytometry (Fig. 2d). These results reveal that the formation of growing and nongrowing subpopulations upon infection of amoebae is indeed a reversible phenomenon, and thus, a manifestation of phenotypic heterogeneity of clonal L. pneumophila. In summary, our findings show that the intracellular growth rate variation is a robust and reversible phenotype of viable L. pneumophila. Of note, the intracellular nongrowing subpopulation comprises viable and infectious individual bacteria.

Intracellular nongrowers are nonreplicating persisters

A hallmark of nongrowing bacterial subpopulations is their tolerance toward antibiotics7,37,38. We thus tested the sensitivity of the intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations toward different classes of antibiotics. To this end, A. castellanii was infected with L. pneumophila for 24 h, the infected amoebae were lysed and FACS-sorted intracellular growers and nongrowers were exposed to the fluoroquinolone ofloxacin, the macrolide erythromycin or the aminoglycoside gentamicin (≥10× MIC3941). The percentage of survivors was determined by comparing CFU to untreated subpopulations (Fig. 2e). Under these conditions, the nongrowing subpopulation showed a higher tolerance toward all tested antibiotics (ofloxacin > erythromycin > gentamycin). Alternatively, we exposed A. castellanii infected with L. pneumophila for 24 h p.i. to high concentrations of ofloxacin (300 μg mL−1, 1 h) prior to FACS-sorting and CFU counting of the subpopulations. This approach confirmed that nongrowers survived antibiotics treatment better than growing bacteria also in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b).

The phenomenon of persistence is defined by a bi-phasic killing kinetic upon antibiotic exposure, where the majority of a clonal population is rapidly killed, while a subpopulation persists for a longer period of time42. To assess whether L. pneumophila forms persisters in host cells, A. castellanii was infected with wild-type bacteria for 24 h, the infected amoebae were lysed and the released bacteria were exposed to ofloxacin or erythromycin at a concentration of 100× MIC. Under these conditions, bi-phasic killing kinetics were observed for L. pneumophila, and the survivors exhibited similar kill curves in follow-up experiments (Fig. 2f), indicating the phenotypic rather than the genetic nature of the antibiotic tolerance. At the end of the antibiotic treatment, flow cytometry analysis performed in parallel to the plating confirmed that the survivors originated from a homogeneous population of nondividing bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 7a).

A possible mechanism for increased persistence upon treatment with antibiotics might be increased antibiotic efflux. We addressed the bacterial drug efflux capacity by measuring by flow cytometry the accumulation of ethidium bromide43,44. In agreement with a potential contribution to antibiotic tolerance, we measured significantly lower drug acquisition in FACS-sorted nongrowing compared with growing L. pneumophila in lysates of infected A. castellanii (Supplementary Fig. 7b). In summary, due to the bi-phasic killing kinetic of intracellular L. pneumophila upon exposure to antibiotic and the increased tolerance of the nongrowing subpopulation toward different antibiotics, intracellular L. pneumophila nongrowers are defined as nonreplicating persisters with increased drug efflux capacity (or reduced drug accumulation).

The intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations produce distinct proteomes

To characterize the intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations on a biochemical level, we analyzed nongrowers and growers by comparative proteomics. To this end, A. castellanii was infected with L. pneumophila/Timer for 24 h, lysed, and the FACS-sorted subpopulations were subjected to proteomics analysis. We identified more than 1000 proteins differentially produced in the growers and nongrowers (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Data 1). Among the growing subpopulation, slow- and fast-growers shared a very similar proteomic signature (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c, and Supplementary Data 2), and therefore, they were treated as one subpopulation of growing bacteria.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations produce distinct proteomes. a A. castellanii amoebae were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila/Timer, lysed and the intracellular bacterial subpopulations FACS-sorted according to the Timer green/red color ratio. Comparative proteomics of sorted growers (G) and nongrowers (NG) revealed differentially produced proteins. Protein abundance in each subpopulation is depicted as volcano plot (see Supplementary Data 1 for the full dataset). b Functional classification of proteins identified in intracellular growing and nongrowing L. pneumophila subpopulations. The abundance of c Icm/Dot T4SS subunits and d Icm/Dot-translocated effector proteins are depicted. NG nongrowers, G growers. Data represent the mean ± SEM of four biological replicates (n = 4) pooled into two to increase the number of peptides detected

In the growing subpopulation of intracellular L. pneumophila, ribosomal subunits, aminoacyl-tRNA synthases, cell division proteins (e.g. FtsZ, SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) ATPases45), DNA replication proteins (e.g. DnaA, PolI) and DNA mismatch repair enzymes (e.g. MutS46) were enriched. These findings are consistent with an increased replicative activity of this subpopulation. Intracellular L. pneumophila growers also produced more IolD, an enzyme involved in inositol catabolism, in agreement with previous findings on the intracellular catabolism of this carbohydrate by L. pneumophila47. Moreover, the intracellular growers preferentially produced the detoxifying enzyme Lpg2965, a peroxynitrite reductase, suggesting that they might undergo nitrosative stress.

The nongrowers preferentially produced the 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase BdhA and thus might feed on the storage compound poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. They also produced the lipase MhpC as well as the putative long chain fatty acid transporter Lpg1810, suggesting the catabolism of lipids. Interestingly, in broth, L. pneumophila utilizes exogenous fatty acid such as palmitic acid to synthesize poly-3-hydroxybutyrate48. Nongrowing L. pneumophila also produced the superoxide dismutase SodC, thereby responding to and being protected from reactive oxygen species. Along the same line, the nongrowers further produced the DNA-glycosidase MutM that repairs ROS-mediated DNA damages49. Finally, as many as ~75% of the proteins of unknown function were preferentially produced by the intracellular nongrowing subpopulation (Fig. 3b). In summary, these findings suggest an alternative physiology and nutrient utilization for the growing and nongrowing intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations.

Intracellular L. pneumophila nongrowers are highly virulent

In intracellular nongrowing L. pneumophila the sigma factor RpoN (σ54) is primarily upregulated, but this subpopulation also produced the stationary phase sigma factor RpoS (σ38,), which is implicated in virulence50,51. Moreover, the intracellular nongrowers preferentially produce the enzyme RelA involved in (p)ppGpp metabolism, indicating the activation of the stringent response in response to amino acid starvation, which is a hallmark of L. pneumophila’s switch from the replicative to the virulent/transmissive phase52,53.

Strikingly, the comparative proteomics of intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations revealed that the nongrowers upregulate components of the Icm/Dot T4SS (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Data 1) as well as 35 known Icm/Dot-translocated effector proteins (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Data 1). Most of those proteins are also produced when L. pneumophila is grown to the transmissive phase in broth54. To confirm the virulence of the intracellular nonreplicating persisters, we FACS-sorted the growing and nongrowing subpopulations that had formed in amebae 24 h p.i., subsequently reinfected A. castellanii and determined intracellular growth at 96 h p.i. by CFU (Fig. 4a). This approach revealed that the intracellular nongrowers were indeed highly virulent and also significantly more virulent than the growing subpopulation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Intracellular L. pneumophila nongrowers are highly virulent. a Intracellular nongrowers are virulent. A. castellanii were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila/Timer, lysed and FACS-sorted according to the Timer green/red color ratio. Sorted growers and nongrowers were used to re-infect A. castellanii, and intracellular replication was determined by CFU (fold change: CFU30 min p.i./CFU 96 h p.i.). b T4SS-dependent survival of intracellular nongrowers. A. castellanii were infected (MOI 1) with L. pneumophila wild-type (black), the isogenic avirulent ΔicmT strain (yellow) and the complemented strain ΔicmT(icmTS) (green) expressing timer. At given time points, the nongrowers from infected amoebae lysates were quantified by flow cytometry and analyzed by comparison with WT. c, d Intracellular nongrowers reside in individual LCVs. c D. discoideum amoebae producing the ER/LCV marker calnexin-GFP or the PtdIns(4)P probe P4C-GFP were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila/Timer WT or the ΔicmT/Timer strain, fixed and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Micrographs show overlays of the fluorescence at 500 nm (GFP, Timer) and 600 nm (Timer). White arrows show GFP-positive membrane only around intracellular WT growers and nongrowers. Scale bars 10 μm. d D. discoideum/P4C-GFP was infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila/Timer WT or ΔicmT/Timer and P4C-GFP enrichment measured by imaging flow cytometry. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three biological replicates (n = 3; light gray filled circles). Student’s t test two-tailed; ***P < 0.001, *P < 0.05. Source data are provided as a Source Data file

To further characterize the L. pneumophila intracellular nongrowers, we compared them to the Icm/Dot T4SS deficient ΔicmT mutant strain, which is defective for intracellular replication. To this end, lysates of amoebae infected for 24 h with L. pneumophila WT, ΔicmT or the complemented strain ΔicmT(icmTS) producing Timer were analyzed by flow cytometry. This analysis revealed that a functional Icm/Dot T4SS significantly increased the survival of nongrowers over time (Fig. 4b). This result echoed with the incapability of L. pneumophila lacking a functional Icm/Dot T4SS to form a degradation-resistant compartment.

To assess, whether intracellular nongrowing L. pneumophila wild-type indeed localize in the unique calnexin- and PtdIns(4)P-positive LCV, we employed the genetically tractable ameba Dictyostelium discoideum, a versatile and powerful model of L. pneumophila infection11. In infected D. discoideum, L. pneumophila/Timer formed growing and nongrowing subpopulations of ca. 50% each 24 h p.i. (Supplementary Fig. 9), very similar to what was observed in infected A. castellanii (Fig. 1e). Fluorescence microscopy indicated that upon infection of D. discoideum producing the ER/LCV marker calnexin-GFP55,56 or the Golgi/LCV PtdIns(4)P probe P4C-GFP5759, with L. pneumophila/Timer for 24 h, growing as well as nongrowing bacteria resided in membrane-bound compartments decorated with the GFP fusion proteins (Fig. 4c). Quantitative imaging flow cytometry analysis further indicated that growing as well as nongrowing L. pneumophila wild-type accumulated the PtdIns(4)P probe P4C-GFP59, in contrast to vacuoles harboring ΔicmT mutant bacteria, which are devoid of PtdIns(4)P (Fig. 4c, d). Altogether, these results indicate that intracellular nongrowers are highly infectious bacteria that require a functional Icm/Dot T4SS to survive in the host by forming distinct calnexin- and PtdIns(4)P-positive protective LCVs.

Intravacuolar nongrowers upregulate genes of motility and virulence

Upon entry into stationary growth phase in broth, L. pneumophila not only acquires virulence traits, but also becomes flagellated and motile60. As a proxy to assess the motility and virulence of intracellular nongrowing L. pneumophila, we monitored the expression of the gene encoding the major flagellum subunit, flagellin. To this end, we devised a fluorescent reporter combining the constitutive expression of timer and the transcriptional fusion of the gene encoding the blue fluorescent protein mCerulean with the promoter of flagellin (Ptac-timer−PflaA-mCerulean, Supplementary Fig. 10a). As expected, the L. pneumophila(Ptac-timer−PflaA-mCerulean) strain grown to stationary phase in AYE broth showed low Timer color ratios and produced mCerulean, in contrast to exponentially growing cultures (Supplementary Fig. 10b). We then infected A. castellanii with the L. pneumophila(Ptac-timer−PflaA-mCerulean) strain and monitored the production of mCerulean at a single cell level by confocal microscopy (Fig. 5a). At 24 h p.i., intracellular subpopulations of nongrowing mCerulean-positive, and growing mCerulean-negative L. pneumophila had developed (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Intravacuolar nongrowers express hallmark genes of motility and virulence. A. castellanii was infected (MOI 1, 5 h or 24 h) with L. pneumophila harboring the fluorescent reporters a Ptac-timer−PflaA-mCerulean or b Ptac-timer−PsidC-mCerulean, fixed and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Micrographs show the fluorescence for Timer at 500 and 600 nm, for mCerulean at 479 nm and the bright field. The white arrows indicate intracellular red/orange nonreplicating and mCerulean-producing, transmissive bacteria. Scale bar 20 μm. c A. castellanii was infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila harboring the fluorescent reporters PflaA-gfp or PsidC-gfp, fixed and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Micrographs show the overlay of bright field and fluorescence for PflaA-gfp (500 nm, GFP; 600 nm, mCherry, all bacteria) and for PsidC-gfp (500 nm, GFP; 405 nm, DAPI (false red color), all bacteria). The white arrows indicate intracellular nonreplicating and GFP-producing bacteria. Scale bar 10 μm. d The subpopulation fraction and e the absolute number of intracellular GFP producers in the infected cell lysates were determined by flow cytometry. f D. discoideum amoebae producing the LCV marker and PtdIns(4)P probe P4C-GFP were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila (Ptac-timer−PflaA/sidC-mCerulean), fixed and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Micrographs show overlays of the fluorescence at both 500 and 600 nm (to detect Timer and P4C-GFP) and 479 nm (mCerulean). White arrows show GFP-positive membrane surrounding both intracellular growers and nongrowers. Only the nongrowers express hallmark genes for motility and virulence. Scale bars 20 μm. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three biological replicates (n = 3; light gray filled circles). Source data are provided as a Source Data file

Next, we sought to validate the production of the Icm/Dot-translocated effector SidC by intracellular nonreplicating persisters (Fig. 3d). We thus exchanged the promoter of the flagellin gene with the promoter regulating the production of SidC (Ptac-timer−PsidC-mCerulean, Supplementary Fig. 10a), and we confirmed the PsidC induction in stationary phase grown bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 10b). Upon infection of A. castellanii for 24 h with L. pneumophila(Ptac-timer−PsidC-mCerulean), only intracellular nongrowers expressed sidC, as indicated by the production of mCerulean (Fig. 5b).

In order to quantify by flow cytometry the size of the intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulation that induces the flaA promoter, we constructed a dual fluorescent reporter comprising a constitutively expressed mCherry and a gene encoding an unstable GFP under the control of the promoter of flagellin (PflaA-gfp, Supplemental Fig. 11a). In agreement with our previous findings, L. pneumophila/PflaA-gfp grown in broth to stationary phase uniformly produced GFP (Supplemental Fig. 11b). Upon infection of A. castellanii for 24 h L. pneumophila/PflaA-gfp developed a subpopulation of GFP-positive nongrowers (Fig. 5c). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that this GFP-positive subpopulation comprised ca. 45% of the total intracellular bacteria (Fig. 5d), which corresponds to the subpopulation size of intracellular nongrowers previously found (Fig. 1e). Similarly, upon infection of A. castellanii for 24 h with L. pneumophila harboring a transcriptional fusion of a gene producing an unstable GFP and the sidC promoter (PsidC-gfp), GFP-positive nongrowers were observed 24 h p.i. (Fig. 5c). Flow cytometry further indicated that in infected amoebae lysates, the absolute numbers of GFP-positive bacteria harboring PsidC-gfp or PflaA-gfp were very similar (Fig. 5e).

Finally, infection of D. discoideum producing the Golgi/LCV PtdIns(4)P probe P4C-GFP5759 with the L. pneumophila(Ptac-timer−PflaA/sidC-mCerulean) strains confirmed that the intracellular nongrowers producing mCerulean localize in degradation-resistant LCVs (Fig. 5f). In summary, these findings indicate that the intracellular nongrowers residing in replication-permissive LCVs upregulate hallmark genes of motility and virulence.

L. pneumophila produces virulent persisters in macrophages

Formation of intracellular nongrowers in infected amoebae incited us to evaluate the formation of nongrowers in macrophages, an evolutionarily distant phagocytic host for L. pneumophila and the primary target of the pathogen in the human lung61. Intracellular proliferation of L. pneumophila/Timer in macrophages required a functional Icm/Dot T4SS (Supplementary Fig. 12). Infection of mouse macrophages by L. pneumophila/Timer for 24 h revealed a nongrowing population that represented about 10% of the total intracellular bacteria (Fig. 6a, b), which is considerably smaller than the corresponding subpopulation in amoebae (Fig. 1e). Stimulation of macrophages with the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon γ (IFN-γ) prior to infection by L. pneumophila/Timer for 24 h led to a fivefold increase in the number of intracellular nongrowers compared with infected naive macrophages, and reached ca. 50% of the total intracellular bacteria (Fig. 6a, b). Notably, this value was close to the nongrowing subpopulation size observed in infected A. castellanii (Fig. 1e). FACS-sorted nongrowers from lysates of infected IFN-γ-activated macrophages resumed growth upon infection of A. castellanii (Supplementary Fig. 13). Thus, nongrowing L. pneumophila/Timer released from activated macrophage are viable and infectious.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

L. pneumophila produces intracellular nongrowers in macrophages. Naive and IFN-γ treated murine macrophages were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with a, b L. pneumophila/Timer c, d L. pneumophila/PflaA-gfp or e L. pneumophila/PsidC-gfp, and a, c analyzed by confocal microscopy or b, d, e lysed and analyzed by flow cytometry. Micrographs show the overlay of Timer fluorescence (500 and 600 nm) and DAPI staining (nuclei). White arrows indicate intracellular nongrowers with low green/red Timer color ratio or producing GFP. Scale bars 10 μm. The histograms show the proportion of b intracellular growers (G) and nongrowers (NG) or d, e intracellular GFP producers (GFP+) and nonproducers (GFP-). Data represent the mean ± SEM of three biological replicates (n = 3; light gray filled circles). Student’s t test two-tailed. ***P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file

Next, we tested whether L. pneumophila/Timer forms persisters in naive or IFN-γ-treated macrophages. Upon exposure of lysates from infected naive macrophages to ofloxacin (100× MIC) bi-phasic killing kinetics were observed, indicating the presence of persisters (Supplementary Fig. 14). Interestingly, macrophage activation by IFN-γ triggered a significant increase in antibiotic-tolerant persisters (Supplementary Fig. 14), likely due to the higher portion of intracellular nongrowers as compared with naive phagocytes (Fig. 6a, b).

Using the L. pneumophila/Ptac-timer−PflaA/sidC-mCerulean strains to infect macrophages, we further showed by confocal microscopy that the intracellular nongrowers were the only subset expressing hallmark genes of motility and virulence (Supplementary Fig. 15). For quantification by flow cytometry, we used the L. pneumophila PflaA-gfp reporter strain, and determined that in naive macrophages about 10% of the total bacteria produce GFP under control of the PflaA promoter (Fig. 6c, d). INF-γ treated macrophages infected with L. pneumophila PflaA-gfp (Fig. 6c, d) or PsidC-gfp (Fig. 6e) reporter strains hosted five times more GFP producers as compared with the naive macrophages at 24 h p.i. In summary, these findings show that in naive macrophages and even more efficiently in INF-γ-activated macrophages, L. pneumophila forms infectious nonreplicating persisters expressing hallmark genes for virulence and motility.

The Lqs system controls the formation of intracellular nongrowers

Having characterized some features of the subpopulation of intravacuolar virulent persisters, we sought to identify genetic determinants controlling the intracellular phenotypic variation of L. pneumophila. We previously demonstrated that the Lqs system controls the switch from the replicative to the transmissive phase of L. pneumophila28,29,33. Moreover, a regulatory node bridging the Lqs system to the stringent response has been recently documented62. We thus hypothesized that the Lqs system may control the formation of intracellular virulent nonreplicating persisters.

Deletion of the LAI-1 autoinducer synthase lqsA led to a significant decrease (approximately twofold) in the formation of nongrowers in A. castellanii 24 h p.i., as compared with the parental strain (Fig. 7a, b). The ΔlqsA/Timer mutant was not impaired for virulence (Supplementary Fig. 16a) as previously reported for other ΔlqsA strains31. Thus, the reduction in nongrowers was not caused by an overall decrease of bacterial virulence, in contrast to what was observed for the avirulent ΔicmT mutant strain (Fig. 4b). This phenotype of the ΔlqsA mutant strain was genetically complemented (Fig. 7a, b) and also partially reverted upon co-infection with LAI-1-producing wild-type L. pneumophila (Fig. 7c). Finally, the ΔlqsA mutant strain formed reduced numbers of small colonies on CYE agar plates, correlating with the reduced number of nongrowing cells in lysates from infected amebae (Supplemental Fig. 16b).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The Lqs quorum-sensing system controls the formation of intracellular nongrowers. a–c lqsA promotes the formation of intracellular nongrowers. A. castellanii were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila WT, ΔlqsA or the complemented strain ΔlqsA(lqsA) expressing timer, and (a) fixed and analyzed by confocal microscopy or (b) lysed and analyzed by flow cytometry. Micrographs show the overlay of bright field and Timer fluorescence (500 and 600 nm). White arrows indicate intracellular nongrowers. Scale bar 10 μm. Histograms in black show the subpopulation fraction of intracellular nongrowers (black, left Y-axis) and absolute numbers of nongrowers (NG) in cell lysates are shown (yellow, right Y-axis). c A. castellanii were co-infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila WT and ΔlqsA (ratio 10:1), expressing timer or not, lysed and the proportion of intracellular nongrowers in lysates was determined by flow cytometry. d Deletion of lqsA increases the antibiotic sensitivity of intracellular L. pneumophila. A. castellanii were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila WT or ΔlqsA expressing timer, lysed and released bacteria were treated (1 h) or not with of ofloxacin (3 μg mL−1). The percentage of surviving bacteria was determined by CFU. e Deletion of lqsA reduces the proportion in intracellular L. pneumophila expressing PflaA. A. castellanii were infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila WT or ΔlqsA expressing PflaA-gfp, lysed and GFP producers were quantified by flow cytometry in lysates of infected amoebae. f The Lqs quorum-sensing system controls the formation of intracellular nongrowers. A. castellanii was infected (MOI 1, 24 h) with L. pneumophila WT, the isogenic ΔlqsS, ΔlqsT, ΔlqsSlqsT, or ΔlvbR mutant strains and the complemented strains ΔlqsS(lqsS), ΔlqsT(lqsT), or ΔlvbR(lvbR), ΔlqsSlqsT(lqsS), ΔlqsSlqsT(lqsT), expressing timer. After host cell lysis, the fraction of nongrowers was determined by flow cytometry. Data represent the mean ± SEM of at least three biological replicates (n ≥ 3; light gray filled circles). Student’s t test two-tailed. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01. Source data are provided as a Source Data file

The sensitivity of the intracellular ΔlqsA mutant to antibiotics was tested with a >10× MIC of ofloxacin. This experiment revealed a lower antibiotic tolerance of ΔlqsA as compared with the parental strain (Fig. 7d). Furthermore, intracellular ΔlqsA harboring the fluorescent reporter PflaA-gfp developed a reduced subpopulation of GFP producers (approximately twofold) in A. castellanii 24 h p.i. (Fig. 7e). Finally, the ΔlqsA(PsidC-gfp) intracellular nongrowing subpopulation expressed the virulence gene sidC, as indicated by the production of GFP (Supplementary Fig. 16c). Together, these findings support the notion that LqsA controls intracellular growth heterogeneity and formation of L. pneumophila virulent nonreplicating persisters.

We also investigated whether the LAI-1 sensing and signal transduction pathway was contributing to the formation of nongrowers (Fig. 7f and Supplementary Fig. 17). Similar to the deletion of lqsA, the deletion of the individual LAI-1 sensor histidine kinases lqsS or lqsT31,32 led to a reduction in nongrowers in A. castellanii at 24 h p.i. In contrast, deletion of both sensor kinases32 even slightly increased the formation of intracellular nongrowers, and deletion of the response regulator lqsR33 had no effect. The lack of phenotype for ΔlqsR prompted us to look for an alternative response regulator possibly controlling phenotypic heterogeneity. The transcription factor LvbR is negatively regulated by the sensor kinase LqsS63. Deletion of lvbR led to a loss in nongrowers in A. castellanii at 24 h p.i. (Fig. 7f and Supplementary Fig. 17) The phenotypes of the mutants were reverted by genetic complementation (Fig. 7f). Of note, none of the tested mutants differed in its growth rate as compared with growing WT during intracellular growth (Supplementary Fig. 18a) as well as during growth in AYE broth (Supplementary Fig. 18b). In summary, these results indicate that the Lqs system controls the formation of intracellular L. pneumophila virulent nonreplicating persisters.

Discussion

Using single cell approaches (fluorescence microscopy, (imaging) flow cytometry), we show here that the opportunistic pathogen L. pneumophila forms intracellular nongrowers in evolutionarily distant phagocytes (amoebae, macrophages). The intracellular nongrowing bacteria were viable and culturable, adopted increased tolerance toward antibiotics, and showed high virulence, as well as the capacity to form a degradation-resistant compartment in an Icm/Dot T4SS-dependent manner. Moreover, we found that the Lqs system controls the formation of the intracellular nonreplicating virulent L. pneumophila persisters.

Microorganisms enter nonreplicating persistence, either stochastically4 or upon exposure to stress2,5,6,64. Research on intracellular nonreplicating persisters has recently gained heightened attention in efforts to tackle antibiotic tolerance and relapsing infections7. Using the natural interaction of L. pneumophila with protozoan predators, we reveal that the formation of intracellular nongrowing persisters is a pathogen strategy, which is applied to evolutionarily distant host cells, and which predates the emergence of metazoans. Intra-amebae nonreplicating persistence is a prominent phenomenon during amebae infection and may at least partly explain the difficulties to eradicate L. pneumophila in contaminated water systems65.

Using comparative proteomics of FACS-sorted intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulations, we further show that the intracellular nonreplicating persisters remain metabolically active and might engage specific fatty acid-based metabolic routes. Proteins that have been shown to be important in persisters originating from other bacteria were elevated in the proteome of L. pneumophila intracellular nongrowers. Resistance-nodulation-cell division multidrug efflux pumps (e.g., MexF) and toluene resistance proteins were upregulated in the nongrowing subpopulation (12- and 5-fold, respectively). Intracellular nongrowers also produced fivefold more adenylate cyclase CyaA4 as compared with the growing subpopulation. An elevated level of the second messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP) correlates to increased antibiotic tolerance66, which indeed was found for the intracellular nongrowing L. pneumophila population (Fig. 2e, Supplementary Fig. 6). In contrast, nongrowers produced lower amounts of the FoF1 ATP synthase (AtpH, AtpF, AtpD, AtpA2, and AtpG) in agreement with lower ATP concentrations present in nonreplicating bacteria and a link between bacterial nonreplicating persistence and decline in ATP production5.

To survive in the bactericidal host, nonreplicating persisters subvert host functions using the Icm/Dot T4SS and build a protective, replication-permissive LCV. Recently, the subversion of cell autonomous immunity of infected macrophages by Salmonella nonreplicating persisters was reported67. Thus, manipulation of the host by intracellular persisters is likely to be a general and ancient trait. The proteomics results and their experimental validation indicated that nonreplicating persisters are fully equipped to initiate growth either in their current host cell or upon release. In agreement with this notion, we demonstrated that this intracellular subpopulation remains highly virulent for protozoan host cells (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Figs. 5,  13, and Supplementary Movie 2).

Virulence of L. pneumophila has been extensively studied at a population level17,20,68 and may comprise different traits in exponentially growing and stationary phase bacteria in broth54. In this study, the comparative proteomics approach revealed the coexistence of distinct L. pneumophila intracellular subpopulations producing alternative sets of virulence factors, which thus might represent distinct aspects of intracellular L. pneumophila virulence. We notably identified a few virulence factors specifically enriched in the growing population (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Data 1), the functions of which in supporting intracellular growth remain unknown.

Infection of macrophages by L. pneumophila revealed a nongrowing population that represented about 10% of the total intracellular bacteria, which is considerably smaller than the corresponding subpopulation of about 50% in amoebae. A low number of intracellular nongrowers is in agreement with previous studies analyzing the facultative intracellular pathogen S. enterica serovar Typhimurium2,6,69. Intriguingly however, upon activation of the macrophages with IFN-γ, the nongrowing population increased to about 50% of the total intracellular bacteria. A possible interpretation of these observations is that the amoebae behave as “activated” phagocytes for L. pneumophila. Macrophages activated by pro-inflammatory cytokine(s) show increased bactericidal activities. In addition, they promote the intracellular persistence and virulence of a bacterial pathogen.

In the current study, we identify the Lqs system as a genetic determinant controlling virulent L. pneumophila persister formation. The deletion of lqsA does not have a major impact on bacterial virulence31, and only a few genes were regulated in L. pneumophila upon stimulation with the cognate signaling molecule, LAI-134. Thus, major transcriptional alterations do not seem to underlie the observed phenotype. LAI-1-dependent signaling is complex and proceeds through the two homologous sensor kinases LqsS and LqsT, which are encoded by the lqsS gene located in the lqs cluster and the orphan lqsT gene, respectively32. The virulence and other phenotypes of the ΔlqsSlqsT double mutant strain are partially complemented by providing either lqsS or lqsT on a plasmid32. This feature is also seen for reversion of the phenotype of the ΔlqsSlqsT mutant regarding the increased ratio of growers vs. nongrowers (Fig. 7f). Moreover, the lqsS and lqsT genes are differentially regulated in stationary growth phase, and transcriptome studies indicated that 90% of the genes, which are downregulated in absence of lqsT, are upregulated in absence of lqsS32. The reciprocal and complex gene regulation pattern implicating signaling through LqsS and/or LqsT might also account for the fact that upon infection of A. castellanii with either the ΔlqsS or the ΔlqsT mutant strain the percentage of nongrowers was lower compared with wild-type L. pneumophila, while upon infection with the ΔlqsSlqsT double mutant strain the percentage was higher (Fig. 7f). Interestingly, the size of the nongrowing intracellular L. pneumophila subpopulation seems also to be controlled by the recently characterized DNA-binding transcription factor LvbR63, rather than the response regulator LqsR33. LvbR links the Lqs and c-di-GMP regulatory networks63, and the comparative proteomics approach documented in this study revealed that the intracellular nongrowing subpopulation shows a 10-30-fold enrichment in various diguanylate cyclases presumably producing c-di-GMP. Further studies will address the role of the second messenger c-di-GMP in regulating intracellular virulent L. pneumophila persisters. The work outlined here provides a basis to further analyze the triggers and consequences of intracellular phenotypic heterogeneity of a major human pathogen. In addition to its clinical relevance as the causative agent of a life-threatening pneumonia, L. pneumophila will serve as a paradigm to unravel on a molecular and cellular level the mechanisms of phenotypic heterogeneity of bacterial pathogens residing in phagocytic host cells.

Methods

Bacterial strains, eukaryotic cell lines, and reagents

Bacterial strains and eukaryotic cell lines used in this study are listed in the Supplementary Data 3. L. pneumophila strains are derived from L. pneumophila JR32. They were grown for 3 days on charcoal yeast extract (CYE) agar plates, buffered with N‐(2‐acetamido)‐2‐aminoethane sulfonic acid (ACES) at 37 °C. Liquid cultures in ACES yeast extract (AYE) medium were inoculated at an OD600 of 0.1 and grown fully aerated at 37 °C to stationary phase. Chloramphenicol (Cam; 5 μg mL−1) was added as required. A. castellanii (ATCC 30234) was grown in proteose, yeast extract, glucose (PYG) medium at 25 °C or, when stated, in the fresh water mimicking Combo medium (UTEX media). Dictyostelium discoideum wild-type strain Ax3 producing calnexin-GFP56,70 or P4C-GFP59 was grown in HL‐5 medium supplemented with geneticin (G418, 20 μg mL−1) at 23 °C. Nontumorigenic monocyte-derived Maf-DKO murine macrophages2,71 were cultured in DMEM/10% FCS supplemented with 30% L-929 cell-conditioned medium in 5% CO2. Cells were infected with L. pneumophila at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. After centrifugation at 170 × g for 10 min to enhance and synchronize the infection, cells were incubated for 45 min, subsequently washed and the culture medium replaced. For macrophages, 16 μg mL−1 gentamicin for was added for 60 min to kill extracellular bacteria. Cells were subsequently washed and warm culture medium containing 16 μg mL−1 added. When required, macrophages were pre-stimulated 24 h with 10 ng mL−1 murine IFN-γ (PeproTech). Infected amoebae and murine macrophages were incubated at 25 °C and 37 °C respectively. MitoTracker Deep Red (Invitrogen) was prepared and used according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The use of MitoTracker as a bacterial membrane potential probe is described in ref. 72.

Fluorescence reporters and complementation plasmids

Plasmids and primers used are listed in the Supplementary Data 4 and 5. To construct the Timer growth rate reporter2, the timer sequence was amplified from pBR322-timer (Addgene #103056) using the primers oNP46 forward/reverse, and subsequently was cloned into the pMMB207-C derivative pSN7, generating the plasmid pNP107. timer expression was under the control of the Ptac promoter and the T7 ribosome binding site (RBS). Growth rate at a single cell level was defined by the Timer color ratio [(green, excitation 488 nm, emission 515–545 nm)/(red, excitation 561 nm, emission 600–620 nm)]. Nongrowing bacteria have a low Timer color ratio and appear red/orange. Growing bacteria have a high color ratio and appear green. To generate PflaA-gfp (dual fluorescence reporter) the locus harboring both mCherry and the short-live gfpsfm2-laa from pTSARUd2.4s73 was cloned into the pMMB207-C derivative pCM434 using the primers oNP26 forward/reverse to generate the plasmid pNP83. Constitutive mCherry expression was achieved by inserting the Ptac promoter from pNT2833 using the primers oNP41 forward/reverse, yielding the plasmid pSN1. mCherry expression was improved using the T7 RBS amplified from pNT28 using the primers oNP45 forward/reverse, generating the plasmid pSN2. To increase GFPsfm2-LAA degradation rate74, the sequence encoding the peptide tag AANDENYAAAV at the carboxyl terminus was generated by site-directed mutagenesis of pSN2 using the primers oNP28 forward/reverse (QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis; Agilent) yielding the plasmid pSN5. A hairpin transcriptional terminator followed by a multiple cloning site was synthesized and inserted upstream the gene encoding gfpsfm2-aav, yielding the plasmid pSN6. It allows a quick promoter exchange and prevents polar transcriptional activity originating from the Ptac promoter. Promoters of interest were mapped by combining published promoter maps, RNA sequencing75 and the software Softberry (http://www.softberry.com/) available online. For PflaA-gfp, the flaA promoter was amplified from the L. pneumophila chromosome using the primers oSN2 forward/reverse and inserted upstream the gfpsfm2-aav to generate the plasmid pSN7. Plasmid-based expression systems are a source of fluctuations caused by differences in plasmid copy numbers or by alternative protein production capacities within the bacterial population. mCherry was used to normalized GFP production in order to accurately quantify changes in the promoter activity as well as to detect bacteria by microscopy or flow cytometry. To generate PsidC-gfp the sidC promoter was amplified from the L. pneumophila chromosome using the primers oCM78 forward/reverse and inserted into pCM434 upstream of the unstable gfp to generate the plasmid pCM11. To generate Ptac-timer−PflaA/sidC-mCerulean, mCerulean was amplified from pNP99 using the primers oNP72 forward/reverse and used to replace the gfp in pCM934 and pCM11. The corresponding new plasmids are pNP125 and pNP126, respectively. The locus PflaA/sidC-mCerulean was then amplified from pNP125 and pNP126 using the primers oNP73 forward/reverse and inserted into pNP107 at the BspQI site. The plasmids thus generated were named pNP127 and pNP128, respectively. To construct a complementation plasmid for the ΔicmT mutant strain, the locus Ptac-timer was amplified from pNP107 using the primers oNP77 forward/reverse and inserted into pGS‐Lc‐37‐1436 leading to plasmid pNP124. To construct a complementation plasmid for the ΔlqsA mutant strain, the lqsA gene was amplified from the L. pneumophila JR32 chromosome using the primers oNP60 forward/reverse and inserted into pNP107, downstream of the timer encoding gene, yielding the plasmid pNP120. timer and lqsA are organized as an operon. To construct a complementation plasmid for the ΔlqsS, ΔlqsT, and ΔlvbR mutant strain, The locus Ptac-timer was excised from pNP107 using the restriction enzyme ApaI and XmnI and inserted into pNT3131, pAK232, and pAK1863 leading to the plasmid pNP121, pNP122, and pNP123, respectively.

Comparative proteomics

For sample preparation ~60 × 106 A. castellanii were infected for 24 h, yielding 15 × 106 sorted bacteria per subset and replicate (four replicates). Lysates and sorted bacteria were kept in ice-cold PBS supplemented with 180 μM Cam to prevent protein degradation and synthesis. Sorted bacteria were lysed in 50 μl of lysis buffer (1% sodium deoxycholate (SDC), 10 mM TCEP, 100 mM Tris, pH 8.5) using 20 cycles of sonication (one cycle is 30 s on, 30 s off; Bioruptor, Dianode). Then, proteins were reduced at 95 °C for 10 min and, after cooling to room temperature, the proteins were alkylated in 15 mM chloroacetamide for 30 min at 37 °C. Proteins were digested using sequencing-grade modified trypsin (1/50, w/w, trypsin/protein; Promega, USA) overnight at 37 °C. After digestion, the samples were supplemented with TFA to a final concentration of 1%. Peptides were cleaned up using PreOmics Cartridges (PreOmics, Martinsried, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After drying the samples under vacuum, the peptides were resuspended in 0.1% aqueous formic acid solution at a concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1. 0.5 μg of peptides of each sample were subjected to LC–MS analysis using a dual pressure LTQ-Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer connected to an electrospray ion source (both Thermo Fisher Scientific) as recently specified76 and a custom-made column heater set to 60 °C. Peptide separation was carried out using an EASY nLC-1000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a RP-HPLC column (75 μm × 30 cm) packed in-house with C18 resin (ReproSil-Pur C18–AQ, 1.9 μm resin; Dr Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch-Entringen, Germany) using a linear gradient from 95% solvent A (0.1% formic acid, 99.9% water) and 5% solvent B (80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid, 19.9% water) to 35% solvent B over 50 min to 50% solvent B over 10 min to 95% solvent B over 2 min and 95% solvent B over 18 min at a flow rate of 0.2 μl/min. The data acquisition mode was set to obtain one high resolution MS scan in the FT part of the mass spectrometer at a resolution of 240,000 full width at half maximum (at 400 m/z, MS1) followed by MS/MS (MS2) scans in the linear ion trap of the 20 most intense MS signals. The charged state screening modus was enabled to exclude unassigned and singly charged ions and the dynamic exclusion duration was set to 30 s. The ion accumulation time was set to 300 ms (MS1) and 25 ms (MS2). MS1 and MS2 scans were acquired at a target setting of 106 ions and 10,000 ions, respectively. The collision energy was set to 35%, and one microscan was acquired for each spectrum. For label-free quantification, in our LFQ workflow the MS raw files were imported into the Progenesis QI (Nonlinear Dynamics, v2.0) and analyzed using the default parameter settings. MS2 data were exported directly from Progenesis in mgf format and analyzed using Mascot (Matrix Science, version 2.4.1), against a concatenated target-decoy database containing normal and reverse sequences of the predicted SwissProt entries of L. pneumophila (ATCC_33152/DSM_7513, www.uniprot.org, release date 9/05/2017), and commonly observed contaminants (in total 10,006 protein sequences) generated using the SequenceReverser tool from the MaxQuant software (Version 1.0.13.13). The Mascot search criteria were set as follows: 10 ppm precursor ion mass tolerance, 0.6 Da fragment ion mass tolerance, full tryptic specificity required (cleavage after lysine or arginine residues unless followed by proline), maximum of three missed cleavages, fixed modifications, carbamidomethylation (C); variable modification, oxidation (M) and acetyl (protein N-term). Results from the database search were imported into Progenesis and a list with all quantified peptides exported. The quantitative data were further processed and statically analyzed using the SafeQuant software tool77. In brief, the false-discovery rate (FDR) of identifications on the peptide and protein level was set to 1% based on the number of decoy hits obtained from reversed protein sequence entries. For quantification, the analysis included global data normalization by equalizing the total peak areas across all LC–MS runs, summation of peak areas per protein and LC–MS2 run, followed by calculation of protein abundance ratios. Only isoform specific peptide ion signals were considered for quantification. The summarized protein expression values were used for statistical testing of between condition differentially abundant proteins. Here, empirical Bayes moderated t-tests were applied, as implemented in the R/Bioconductor limma package

The resulting per protein and condition comparison p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method (http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html). The mass-spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE78 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD015106 (project 10.6019/PXD015106).

Confocal microscopy and image processing

Sixty minutes after inoculation, infected amoebae were seeded into chambered coverslips (ibidi μ-Slide8 Well). At given time points, infected cells were washed 3× with PBS and fixed with 2% PFA/0.1% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 60 min. Following fixation the cells were washed and the fixative was quenched with 0.1 M glycine for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were immobilized by adding a layer of PBS/0.1% agarose. Alternatively, cells were analyzed by time lapse microscopy. Image acquisition was performed using the confocal microscope Leica SP8 at 63× magnification. Image processing was realized with the ImageJ software. Timer color ratio at a single cell level was obtain as follow: [(green, excitation 488 nm, emission 515–545 nm)/(red, excitation 561 nm, emission 600–620 nm)].

Correlation of Timer fluorescence ratio and growth rates

L. pneumophila microcolony formation is described in reference35. Briefly, stationary phase grown bacteria were embedded in AYE/0.5% agarose at a final OD600 nm of 0.1 and poured into chambered coverslips (ibidi μ-Slide 8 Well). After solidification, single bacteria were let grown into microcolonies for 16 h (at 25 °C) or 12 h (at 37 °C). Microcolony formation was monitored by confocal microscopy. The Timer color ratio was measured at a single cell level and correlated to the number of division that occurred.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

For FRAP experiments, L. pneumophila-infected amoebae were seeded 60 min p.i. into chambered coverslips (ibidi μ-Slides 8 Well). Twenty-four hours p.i., the infected cells were immobilized by adding a layer of PYG/0.1% agarose. Fluorescence acquisition was performed using the confocal microscope Leica SP8 at 63× magnification. Photobleaching was set up according to the FRAP-wizard of the Leica user interface on narrowed regions of interest. Photobleaching was performed using the FRAP-booster, 100% 488 nm laser intensity for 79 ms and 30× iterations.

Flow cytometry analysis

Phagocytes were infected with L. pneumophila wild-type or the isogenic deletion mutant strains and lysed using 0.1% Triton TX-100 (Sigma) in 150 mM NaCl (amoebae) or PBS (macrophages). After centrifugation the pellets were washed in PBS and fixed with 2% PFA/0.1% glutaraldehyde for 60 min. Following fixation cells were washed and the fixative was quenched with 0.1 M glycine for 20 min at room temperature. Relevant spectral parameters were subsequently recorded in a FACS-Fortessa II. The gating strategy was performed as described in references273 for the Timer and the dual fluorescence reporters, respectively. Data processing was realized with the software FlowJo. Spectral properties collected using the Timer and dual fluorescence reporter were analyzed by calculating the Log10[(Ex 488 nm, Em 515–545 nm)/(Ex 561 nm, Em 600–620 nm)] for each detected bacterium. To accurately determine the fluorescent particle counts and to be able to compare conditions, we used defined resuspension volume and acquisition time.

Intracellular bacterial viability

A. castellanii infected for 24 h with gfp expressing L. pneumophila was lysed using 0.1% Triton TX-100 (Sigma) in 150 mM NaCl. Released bacteria were washed in PBS and incubated with propidium iodide (PI; 10 μg mL−1, 30 min). Bacterial viability was subsequently determined by flow cytometry. A gating strategy using the GFP signal was used to identify the bacteria in the lysate. Bacterial death was triggered by fixing the lysate with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Electron Microscopy Sciences) and served as PI positive controls. The use of PFA was guided by the need of preserving GFP fluorescence and bacterial shape.

Imaging flow cytometry

For imaging flow cytometry analysis of PtdIns(4)P localization to the LCV, D. discoideum Ax3 producing the PtdIns(4)P probe P4CSidC-GFP were infected (MOI of 1) with L. pneumophila expressing timer. The cells were detached and fixed with 2% PFA (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 60 min, and the fixative was quenched with 0.1 M glycine for 20 min at room temperature. At least 20,000 events were acquired using an ImageStream X MkII imaging flow cytometer (Amnis). Data analysis was performed with IDEAS 6.2 software, and after color compensation, at least 600 cells with internalized red fluorescent bacteria were identified by gating and classified as containing one or multiple bacteria as previously described59. In the gated cell populations, the mean intensity of P4CSidC-GFP on one LCV or several LCVs was analyzed in a two pixel-wide mask surrounding the bacteria using the feature [Mean Pixel_Dilate(Spot(M04, Lpn, Bright, 8.5, 1), 4) And Not Dilate(Spot(M04, Lpn, Bright, 8.5, 1), 2)_P4C].”

Cell sorting

A. castellanii infected for 24 h with timer expressing L. pneumophila were lysed using 0.1% Triton TX-100 (Sigma) in HS buffer (20 mM N -2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid; 250 mM sucrose; 0.5 mM ethyleneglycoltetraacetic acid; pH adjusted to 7.2 with 1 M KOH). Lysates were centrifuged (250 × g, 15 min), and resuspended in PBS, followed by nine passages through a ball homogenizer (Isobiotech, http://www.isobiotec.com) using an exclusion size of 6 μm. Samples were sorted according to the Timer color ratio using an Aria II (BD Biosciences) with scatter and fluorescence channels (green, excitation 488 nm, emission 515–545 nm; red, excitation 561 nm, emission 600–620 nm), a nozzle size of 70 μm, using the four-way purity mode and a sorting efficiency >90%. Sorted subsets were systematically reanalyzed.

Persister assays

Bi-phasic kill curves: ~107 phagocytes were infected as described above. After 24 h, infected cells were lysed using 0.1% Triton TX-100 (Sigma) in HS buffer and the bacteria were resuspended in AYE supplemented or not with erythromycin 60 μg mL−1 (>100× MIC) or ofloxacin 30 μg mL−1 (>100× MIC). Bacterial suspension were incubated at 25 °C or 37 °C depending on the host cell used. At given time points, bacteria were collected and washed three times. For each wash 1 mL PBS was used and 950 mL of the supernatant discarded. The bacterial suspensions were subsequently serially diluted 1:10 and plated to quantify CFUs. Survivors were harvested from the plates from the last time point and used for follow-up experiments.

Antibiotic tolerance of subpopulations ex vivo and in vivo

Approximately 107 A. castellanii were infected as described above. After 24 h, amoebae were lysed and the released intracellular growing and nongrowing bacteria were sorted according to the Timer color ratio for each individual. Sorted subpopulations were subsequently incubated in fresh AYE supplemented or not with antibiotics (≥10× MIC; 1 h, 3–20 µg mL−1 depending on the antibiotic) or ethidium bromide (1 h, 1 µg mL−1). After washing, antibiotic tolerance for each subpopulation was evaluated by plating the bacteria and quantifying CFU. Ethidium bromide uptake was monitored by flow cytometry analysis. Alternatively, infected cells were treated or not with highly concentrated ofloxacin (300 μg mL−1) for 1 h. Infected cells were subsequently lysed and 105 released intracellular growing and nongrowing bacteria were sorted according to the Timer color ratio for each condition. Antibiotic tolerance for each subset was evaluated by plating the bacteria and quantifying CFU.

Growth resumption of intracellular nongrowers

Approximately 107 A. castellanii or IFN-γ-treated murine macrophages were infected as described above. After 24 h, the phagocytes were lysed, the released intracellular nongrowing bacteria were sorted according to the Timer color ratio and used to infect fresh A. castellanii. Intracellular growth resumption of the sorted nongrowers was monitored by confocal microscopy.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Statistical differences were determined using a two-tailed Student t test on the means of at least three independent experiments. Probability values of less than 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 were used to show statistically significant differences and are represented with *, **, or ***, respectively. For the comparative proteomics, the summarized protein expression values were used for statistical testing of between condition differentially abundant proteins. Empirical Bayes moderated t-tests were applied, as implemented in the R/Bioconductor limma package

The resulting per protein and condition comparison p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method (http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (234.1KB, pdf)
41467_2019_13021_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (27.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (125KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (41.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (11.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4 (12.1KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 5 (11.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Movie 2 (403.6KB, avi)
Reporting Summary (92.7KB, pdf)
Source Data (46KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Hilbi group for comments and discussions. We are grateful to Prof. Francois-Xavier Campbell-Valois for generously providing pTSARUd2.4 s and Selina Niggli for initial cloning. N.P. and B.S. research in the laboratory of H.H. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Ambizione program (PZ00P3_161492 & PZ00P3_161492 185529) awarded to N.P. Research in the laboratory of H.H. was supported by the SNF (31003A_153200, 31003A_175557), the Novartis Foundation for Medical-Biological Research, the OPO Foundation, and the German Research Foundation (DFG; SPP 1617). A.W. was supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council (2014-396). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the paper.

Author contributions

N.P. conceived the study with input from H.H. and designed the experiments. N.P., B.S., E.L., C.M., A.W. and A.S. performed the experiments. N.P. and H.H. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Data availability

The mass-spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD015106. All other relevant data are included in this article and its Supplementary Information files, or from the corresponding author upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Giulia Manina and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-13021-8.

References

  • 1.Ackermann M. A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;13:497–508. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Claudi B, et al. Phenotypic variation of Salmonella in host tissues delays eradication by antimicrobial chemotherapy. Cell. 2014;158:722–733. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Balaban NQ, Gerdes K, Lewis K, McKinney JD. A problem of persistence: still more questions than answers? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:587–591. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science. 2004;305:1622–1625. doi: 10.1126/science.1099390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Conlon, B. P. et al. Persister formation in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with ATP depletion. Nature Microbiology 1, 16051(2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Helaine S, et al. Internalization of Salmonella by macrophages induces formation of nonreplicating persisters. Science. 2014;343:204–208. doi: 10.1126/science.1244705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harms Alexander, Maisonneuve Etienne, Gerdes Kenn. Mechanisms of bacterial persistence during stress and antibiotic exposure. Science. 2016;354(6318):aaf4268. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fisher RA, Gollan B, Helaine S. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;15:453–464. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Best, A. & Abu Kwaik, Y. Evolution of the arsenal of Legionella pneumophila effectors to modulate protist hosts. Mbio 9, e01313-18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Boamah DK, Zhou G, Ensminger AW, O’Connor TJ. From many hosts, one accidental pathogen: the diverse protozoan hosts of. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:477. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Swart AL, Harrison CF, Eichinger L, Steinert M, Hilbi H. Acanthamoeba and Dictyostelium as cellular models for Legionella infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018;8:61. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Newton HJ, Ang DK, van Driel IR, Hartland EL. Molecular pathogenesis of infections caused by Legionella pneumophila. Clin. Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:274–298. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00052-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Isberg RR, O’Connor TJ, Heidtman M. The Legionella pneumophila replication vacuole: making a cosy niche inside host cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:13–24. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Steiner B, Weber S, Kaech A, Ziegler U, Hilbi H. The large GTPase atlastin controls ER remodeling around a pathogen vacuole. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2018;11:1–5. doi: 10.1080/19420889.2018.1440880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Burstein D, et al. Genomic analysis of 38 Legionella species identifies large and diverse effector repertoires. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:167–175. doi: 10.1038/ng.3481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Burstein D, et al. Genome-scale identification of Legionella pneumophila effectors using a machine learning approach. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000508. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Finsel I, Hilbi H. Formation of a pathogen vacuole according to Legionella pneumophila: how to kill one bird with many stones. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17:935–950. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gomez-Valero L, et al. More than 18,000 effectors in the Legionella genus genome provide multiple, independent combinations for replication in human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:2265–2273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808016116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lifshitz Z, et al. Computational modeling and experimental validation of the Legionella and Coxiella virulence-related type-IVB secretion signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E707–E715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215278110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qiu J, Luo ZQ. Legionella and Coxiella effectors: strength in diversity and activity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;15:591–605. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hilbi H, Haas A. Secretive bacterial pathogens and the secretory pathway. Traffic. 2012;13:1187–1197. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hubber A, Roy CR. Modulation of host cell function by Legionella pneumophila type IV effectors. Annu. Rev. Cell DevBiol. 2010;26:261–283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sherwood RK, Roy CR. Autophagy evasion and endoplasmic reticulum subversion: the Yin and Yang of Legionella intracellular infection. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;70:413–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Personnic N, Bärlocher K, Finsel I, Hilbi H. Subversion of retrograde trafficking by translocated pathogen effectors. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:450–462. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Steiner B, et al. ER remodeling by the large GTPase atlastin promotes vacuolar growth of Legionella pneumophila. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:1817–1836. doi: 10.15252/embr.201743903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Molofsky AB, Swanson MS. Differentiate to thrive: lessons from the Legionella pneumophila life cycle. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;53:29–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Manske C, Hilbi H. Metabolism of the vacuolar pathogen Legionella and implications for virulence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014;4:125. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Personnic N, Striednig B, Hilbi H. Legionella quorum sensing and its role in pathogen-host interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018;41:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tiaden A, Spirig T, Hilbi H. Bacterial gene regulation by α-hydroxyketone signaling. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spirig T, et al. The Legionella autoinducer synthase LqsA produces an α-hydroxyketone signaling molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:18113–18123. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801929200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tiaden A, et al. The autoinducer synthase LqsA and putative sensor kinase LqsS regulate phagocyte interactions, extracellular filaments and a genomic island of Legionella pneumophila. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;12:1243–1259. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kessler A, et al. The Legionella pneumophila orphan sensor kinase LqsT regulates competence and pathogen-host interactions as a component of the LAI-1 circuit. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;15:646–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tiaden A, et al. The Legionella pneumophila response regulator LqsR promotes host cell interactions as an element of the virulence regulatory network controlled by RpoS and LetA. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:2903–2920. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schell U, et al. The alpha-hydroxyketone LAI-1 regulates motility, Lqs-dependent phosphorylation signalling and gene expression of Legionella pneumophila. Mol. Microbiol. 2016;99:778–793. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Personnic N, Striednig B, Hilbi H. Single cell analysis of Legionella and Legionella-infected Acanthamoeba by agarose embedment. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019;1921:191–204. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9048-1_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Segal G, Shuman HA. Intracellular multiplication and human macrophage killing by Legionella pneumophila are inhibited by conjugal components of IncQ plasmid RSF1010. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;30:197–208. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Helaine S, Kugelberg E. Bacterial persisters: formation, eradication, and experimental systems. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:417–424. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Balaban NQ, et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:441–448. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Havlichek D, Saravolatz L, Pohlod D. Effect of quinolones and other antimicrobial agents on cell-associated Legionella pneumophila. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1987;31:1529–1534. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.10.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stout JE, Arnold B, Yu VL. Comparative activity of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and erythromycin against Legionella species by broth microdilution and intracellular susceptibility testing in HL-60 cells. Diagnostic Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1998;30:37–43. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(97)00174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gomez-Lus R, et al. Comparative in vitro bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of trovafloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella spp. Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18:49–54. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00339-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brauner A, Fridman O, Gefen O, Balaban NQ. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:320–330. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Martins M, et al. An instrument-free method for the demonstration of efflux pump activity of bacteria. In vivo. 2006;20:657–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sanchez-Romero MA, Casadesus J. Contribution of phenotypic heterogeneity to adaptive antibiotic resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:355–360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316084111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gruber S. Shaping chromosomes by DNA capture and release: gating the SMC rings. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2017;46:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lamers MH, et al. The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G x T mismatch. Nature. 2000;407:711–717. doi: 10.1038/35037523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Manske C, Schell U, Hilbi H. Metabolism of myo-inositol by Legionella pneumophila promotes infection of amoebae and macrophages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:5000–5014. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01018-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Häuslein Ina, Sahr Tobias, Escoll Pedro, Klausner Nadine, Eisenreich Wolfgang, Buchrieser Carmen. Legionella pneumophila CsrA regulates a metabolic switch from amino acid to glycerolipid metabolism. Open Biology. 2017;7(11):170149. doi: 10.1098/rsob.170149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gomez-Marroquin M, et al. Role of Bacillus subtilis DNA glycosylase MutM in counteracting oxidatively induced DNA damage and in stationary-phase-associated mutagenesis. J. Bacteriol. 2015;197:1963–1971. doi: 10.1128/JB.00147-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hales LM, Shuman HA. The Legionella pneumophila rpoS gene is required for growth within Acanthamoeba castellanii. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181:4879–4889. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.16.4879-4889.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bachman MA, Swanson MS. RpoS co-operates with other factors to induce Legionella pneumophila virulence in the stationary phase. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;40:1201–1214. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hammer BK, Swanson MS. Co-ordination of Legionella pneumophila virulence with entry into stationary phase by ppGpp. Mol. Microbiol. 1999;33:721–731. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zusman T, Gal-Mor O, Segal G. Characterization of a Legionella pneumophila relA insertion mutant and toles of RelA and RpoS in virulence gene expression. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:67–75. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.1.67-75.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aurass P, et al. Life stage-specific proteomes of Legionella pneumophila reveal a highly differential abundance of virulence-associated Dot/Icm effectors. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2016;15:177–200. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M115.053579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lu H, Clarke M. Dynamic properties of Legionella-containing phagosomes in Dictyostelium amoebae. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:995–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00528.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Weber SS, Ragaz C, Reus K, Nyfeler Y, Hilbi H. Legionella pneumophila exploits PI(4)P to anchor secreted effector proteins to the replicative vacuole. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e46. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ragaz C, et al. The Legionella pneumophila phosphatidylinositol-4 phosphate-binding type IV substrate SidC recruits endoplasmic reticulum vesicles to a replication-permissive vacuole. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:2416–2433. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Weber, S., Steiner, B., Welin, A. & Hilbi, H. Legionella-containing vacuoles capture PtdIns(4)P-rich vesicles derived from the Golgi apparatus. MBio 9, 10.1128/mBio.02420-18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59.Welin A, Weber S, Hilbi H. Quantitative imaging flow cytometry of Legionella-infected Dictyostelium amoebae reveals the impact of retrograde trafficking on pathogen vacuole composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;84:e00158–00118. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00158-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Byrne B, Swanson MS. Expression of Legionella pneumophila virulence traits in response to growth conditions. Infect. Immun. 1998;66:3029–3034. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.7.3029-3034.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nash TW, Libby DM, Horwitz MA. Interaction between the Legionnaires’ disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) and human alveolar macrophages. Influence of antibody, lymphokines, and hydrocortisone. J. Clin. Investig. 1984;74:771–782. doi: 10.1172/JCI111493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sahr T, et al. The Legionella pneumophila genome evolved to accommodate multiple regulatory mechanisms controlled by the CsrA-system. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hochstrasser Ramon, Kessler Aline, Sahr Tobias, Simon Sylvia, Schell Ursula, Gomez‐Valero Laura, Buchrieser Carmen, Hilbi Hubert. The pleiotropic Legionella transcription factor LvbR links the Lqs and c‐di‐GMP regulatory networks to control biofilm architecture and virulence. Environmental Microbiology. 2019;21(3):1035–1053. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shan, Y. et al. ATP-dependent persister formation in Escherichia coli. MBio 8, 10.1128/mBio.02267-16 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.Whiley H, Bentham R, Brown MH. Legionella persistence in manufactured water systems: pasteurization potentially selecting for thermal tolerance. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1330. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Molina-Quiroz, R. C. et al. Cyclic AMP regulates bacterial persistence through repression of the oxidative stress response and SOS-dependent DNA repair in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. MBio 9, 10.1128/mBio.02144-17 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Stapels DAC, et al. Salmonella persisters undermine host immune defenses during antibiotic treatment. Science. 2018;362:1156–1160. doi: 10.1126/science.aat7148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Steiner B, Weber S, Hilbi H. Formation of the Legionella-containing vacuole: phosphoinositide conversion, GTPase modulation and ER dynamics. Int J. Med Microbiol. 2018;308:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Helaine S, et al. Dynamics of intracellular bacterial replication at the single cell level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:3746–3751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000041107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Muller-Taubenberger A, et al. Calreticulin and calnexin in the endoplasmic reticulum are important for phagocytosis. Embo J. 2001;20:6772–6782. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Aziz A, Soucie E, Sarrazin S, Sieweke MH. MafB/c-Maf deficiency enables self-renewal of differentiated functional macrophages. Science. 2009;326:867–871. doi: 10.1126/science.1176056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Maslov I, et al. Efficient non-cytotoxic fluorescent staining of halophiles. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20839-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Campbell-Valois FX, et al. A fluorescent reporter reveals on/off regulation of the Shigella type III secretion apparatus during entry and cell-to-cell spread. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Barysheva OV, Fujii J, Takaesu G, Yoshida S. Application of unstable Gfp variants to the kinetic study of Legionella pneumophila icm gene expression during infection. Microbiology. 2008;154:1015–1025. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/013144-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sahr T, et al. Deep sequencing defines the transcriptional map of L. pneumophila and identifies growth phase-dependent regulated ncRNAs implicated in virulence. RNA Biol. 2012;9:503–519. doi: 10.4161/rna.20270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ahrne E, et al. Evaluation and Improvement of Quantification Accuracy in Isobaric Mass Tag-Based Protein Quantification Experiments. J. Proteome Res. 2016;15:2537–2547. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Glatter T, et al. Large-scale quantitative assessment of different in-solution protein digestion protocols reveals superior cleavage efficiency of tandem Lys-C/trypsin proteolysis over trypsin digestion. J. Proteome Res. 2012;11:5145–5156. doi: 10.1021/pr300273g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (234.1KB, pdf)
41467_2019_13021_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (27.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (125KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (41.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (11.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4 (12.1KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 5 (11.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Movie 2 (403.6KB, avi)
Reporting Summary (92.7KB, pdf)
Source Data (46KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The mass-spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD015106. All other relevant data are included in this article and its Supplementary Information files, or from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES