In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. In No. 13, the NPHS1 mutation “c.1135C>T, p. Ala379Thr” was incorrect and should be “c.1135C>T, p. Arg379Trp.” Furthermore, in case No. 6, the NPHS1 mutation “c.1339G>A, p. Glu477Lys” should be “c.1339G>A, p. Glu447Lys.” The corrected Table 3 appears below.
Table 3.
Variant locus analysis in patients with NPHS1 mutation.
| No. | Variation | Amino acid change | Mutation status | Mutation type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | c.2663G>A c.3286+5G>A |
p. Arg888Lys - |
Het Het |
Missense |
| 6 | c.2396G>T c.1339G>A |
p. Gly799Val p. Glu447Lys |
Het Het |
Missense Missense |
| 8 | c.3027C>G c.3478C>T |
p. Tyr1009* p. Ary1160* |
Het Het |
Nonsense Nonsense |
| 10 | c.1740G>T c.2042G>A |
p. Trp580Cys p. Trp681* |
Het Het |
Missense Nonsense |
| 12 | c.713-1G>C c.1760T>G |
- p. Leu587Arg |
Het Het |
Missense |
| 13 | c.2506+5G>T c.1135C>T |
- p. Arg379Trp |
Het Het |
Missense |
| 14 | c.313G>A c.2386G>C |
p. Asp105Asn p. Gly796Arg |
Het Het |
Missense Missense |
*
Mutations detected in NPHS1 gene.
Case 14 is an abandoned baby, and no parental verification was performed.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.