Skip to main content
Maternal & Child Nutrition logoLink to Maternal & Child Nutrition
. 2016 Apr 4;13(2):e12290. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12290

Tracking of toddler fruit and vegetable preferences to intake and adiposity later in childhood

Suzanne Fletcher 1, Charlotte Wright 1,, Angela Jones 2, Kathryn Parkinson 2, Ashley Adamson 2
PMCID: PMC6865898  PMID: 27046078

Abstract

This study examined whether toddlers' liking for fruit and vegetables (FV) predicts intake of FV later in childhood, how both relate to childhood adiposity and how these were moderated by factors in infancy. Children in the Gateshead Millennium Study were recruited at birth in 1999–2000. Feeding data collected in the first year were linked to data from a parental questionnaire completed for 456 children at age 2.5 years (30 m) and to anthropometry, skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance and 4‐day food diary data collected for 293 of these children at age 7 years. Aged 30 months, 50% of children were reported to like eight different vegetables and three fruits, but at 7 years, children ate a median of only 1.3 (range 0–7) portions of vegetables and 1.0 portion of fruit (0–4). Early appetite, feeding problems and food neophobia showed significant univariate associations with liking for FV aged 30 m, but the number of vegetables toddlers liked was the only independent predictor of vegetable consumption at age 7 years (odds ratio (OR) 1.28 p < 0.001). Liking for fruit aged 30 m also independently predicted fruit intake (OR = 1.31, p = 0.016), but these were also related to deprivation (OR = 2.69, p = 0.001) maternal education (OR = 1.28, p = 0.039) and female gender (OR = 1.8, p = 0.024). Children eating more FV at age 7 years had slightly lower body mass index and skinfolds. An early liking for FV predicted increased later intake, so increasing early exposure to FV could have long term beneficial consequences.

Keywords: obesity, vegetables, body composition, eating behaviour, child

Introduction

There are many clear benefits to fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption, from childhood onwards, in enriching the fibre and micronutrient content of the diet while reducing its energy density. Despite this, actual intake levels remain low, particularly in children (Tepper et al. 2009; Bates et al. 2014). People tend to eat foods they like and enjoy (Resnicow et al. 1997), and many children dislike vegetables, possibly because of their bitter/sour flavour (Beauchamp & Mennella 2009). Children have an innate preference for sweet and salty tastes over bitter and sour tastes (Berridge 2000; Schwartz et al. 2009), and studies in older children found that they prefer fatty, sugary foods most and vegetables least (Cooke & Wardle 2005). This is likely to impact on the learned element of food preference (Birch & Fisher 1998), and early preferences appear to track over time (Nicklaus et al. 2004; Blossfeld et al. 2007). Thus, gaining an understanding of food preference development in the early years could inform strategies to influence lifelong healthy eating patterns. Toddlers and young children tend to be neophobic to new foods, but very young infants usually accept new foods and tastes well, as long as they receive repeated exposures (Maier et al. 2007). Recent experimental research has demonstrated that if vegetables are tasted early they can be well accepted (Hausner et al. 2012; Caton et al. 2013; Hetherington et al. 2015)

Previous longitudinal studies have found that intake of home‐cooked and raw FV in early childhood predicts increased intake later in childhood (Coulthard et al. 2010) with other influences being the child's faddiness/pickiness), mother's intake and parental rules (Skinner et al. 2002; Jones et al. 2010). Studies in four European countries, including the UK (de Lauzon‐Guillain et al. 2013; Jones et al. 2015) and from Canada (Burnier et al. 2011) also found that longer breast feeding duration predicted higher FV intake in children aged 2–4 years and that maternal FV intake did not explain the association. It has been suggested that increasing FV intake is important for childhood obesity prevention (Epstein et al. 2008) and one study found an inverse association between body mass index (BMI) and FV intake in children (Heo et al. 2011). Thus, the early complementary feeding period, where solid food is gradually added to supplement breast milk, may be a critical time for the development of taste preferences. However, there are still only a few small studies that have tracked actual taste preference from infancy into childhood, so it is still not clear if that period is actually critical to later eating behaviour and adiposity. The Gateshead Millennium Study (GMS) birth cohort presented an opportunity to examine this question. While not originally set up for this purpose, mothers were surveyed when their child was 2½ years (30 m) about whether a range of foods had been tasted and liked as part of a study of feeding behaviour problems. Then at the age of 7 years, the study assessed children's actual intake of food both at home and at school, as well as collecting a wide range of anthropometric measurements. It was thus possible to examine the extent to which reported food preferences as a toddler tracked on to later eating behaviour and adiposity.

However, simply describing an association is not enough, as dietary patterns are strongly related to socio‐economic characteristics, so their potentially confounding role needed to be explored and adjusted for if necessary. Earlier analyses in the GMS cohort have already found enduring associations between infant weight gain and maternal rating of the child's appetite (Wright et al. 2006b), so we also had to consider the possibility that liking for FV simply reflects overall enthusiasm for food. We thus designed a series of analyses to first examine two main hypotheses:

  • That children with the highest exposure to and liking for FV at age 30 m would go on to eat more portions of FV at age 7 years

  • That children with the greatest early liking for FV and the highest intake in childhood would have the lowest level of adiposity.

We then aimed to formally test the further hypotheses:

  • That children with higher appetite would like and eat more FV, while those with feeding problems and neophobia would eat less,

  • That children from more affluent or educated families and those with the longest breast feeding duration and the earliest onset of solid feeding would like and eat more FV, and

  • That these associations may confound the association between early preference and later intake.

Key messages.

  • Aged 30 m, half the children were reported to like at least eight different vegetables and three fruits, but by age 7 years reported median intake was just 2.5 portions of FV per day, half the recommended intake.

  • An early liking for fruit and vegetables predicted later intake and this was not explained by socio‐economic differences

  • Intake of fruit and vegetables was weakly related to lower adiposity

Method

Participants

This analysis uses data from the GMS, a population‐based cohort study of feeding and growth, which recruited mothers of 1029 infants shortly after birth in 1999–2000 (Parkinson et al. 2011). The cohort was predominantly white Caucasian, reflecting the makeup of the region. Children from a religious community, who made up 3% of the original cohort, were excluded due to their very different lifestyles and dietary patterns (Wright et al. 2010), and preterm infants were also excluded. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Gateshead and South Tyneside Local Research Ethics Committee.

Procedure

Families were sent five postal questionnaires during the first year and another at 30 m. Participants and their families were then studied in school and at home at the age of 7 years. For this analysis, data from the 30‐m questionnaires (Wright et al. 2007a) and dietary intake records and anthropometry collected at age 7 years were analysed, as well as baseline and behavioural data collected in the first year (Wright et al. 2006b).

Measures

Demographic variables

The family postcode at birth was used to allocate their residential area to a deprivation quintile compared with the deprivation levels for the UK Northern region (Townsend et al. 1988). In addition, the roughly 50% families lacking one or more of three amenities (wage earner in household, own home and own car) at birth were defined as relatively deprived (Wright et al. 2006c).

Eating behaviour variables

The age at which children were introduced to complementary foods and length of breastfeeding had been captured during the first year (Wright et al. 2004; Wright et al. 2006a) and mothers were asked to rate their child's ‘appetite’ at age 6 weeks and 12 months on a 5‐point scale from ‘very good’ to ‘very poor’. An eating avidity score (a more global measure of enthusiasm for food) was also determined at 13 months, using a scoring system based on questionnaire responses regarding children's feeding behaviour described previously (Wright et al. 2011). In the 30 m questionnaire, parents rated their child's preference for unfamiliar foods on a 5‐point scale recoded to ‘dislikes’, ‘no preference’ and ‘likes’. In addition, parents were asked if they felt their child generally had a ‘feeding problem’ or specifically showed problematic poor eating, faddiness or mealtimes behaviour (described in detail (Wright et al. 2007a)).

Toddler fruit and vegetable preference and exposure

The 30‐m questionnaire included a modified food preference questionnaire based on the Survey of the Diets of British School children (COMA 1989) already used in older children (Drewett et al. 2006). This included 11 vegetables (carrots, tomatoes, baked beans, peas, cabbage, lettuce, cucumber, onions, okra, yam and gourd) and 7 fruits (oranges, apples, banana, tinned peaches, mangoes, lychees and guava), and carers were asked to indicate their child's like or dislike of each food item using a rating scale (1 = dislikes a lot, 2 = dislikes a little, 3 = neither likes nor dislikes, 4 = likes a little, 5 = likes a lot, 6 = never tried). Four test items (yam, okra, gourd and guava) were included to detect individuals who had ticked all options because of questionnaire fatigue, given the low availability of these items in the UK at the time of data collection. However, there was no evidence of this effect, so no questionnaires were excluded from the dataset, and these items were left in to allow assessment of exposure to more obscure fruits and vegetables. For each child, the number of vegetables, fruits and FV combined tried and liked was calculated.

Seven‐year fruit and vegetable intake

Fruit and vegetables (FV) intake was assessed at 7 years using the Food Assessment in Schools Tool (FAST). This is a prospective dietary assessment method that incorporates elements of the food diary and food frequency methods, which was designed specifically for use by non‐specialists to record food intake of primary‐school children over 4 days (Adamson et al. 2003; Basterfield et al. 2014). This tool has previously been compared with 4‐day weighed intake and shown to be as reliable at characterising the average number and weight of portions eaten (Adamson et al. 2003). Researchers and lay observers recorded foods eaten by each child during the school day, and parents and other carers recorded foods eaten at all other times. In line with the FAST protocol, observers were all advised to record consumption of one portion of any food item as long as one or more mouthful was eaten. All foods consumed were allocated to one of 43 food groups, which included ‘fruit’, ‘fruit juice’ and ‘vegetable’. Total 4‐day portions were used to calculate average number of daily portions of fruits, vegetables and total FV. Potatoes were not included, and fruit juice was counted separately, in line with UK recommendations (Public‐Health‐England 2013).

Anthropometric variables

Children's length and weight were obtained by the GMS study nurse at a 13 month health check clinic. At 7 years, the research staff measured height (Leicester portable measure) and weight and leg‐to‐leg bioelectrical impedance (BIA) using the Tanita TBF‐300MA (Tanita Coporation, Arlington Heights, IL, United States). Triceps and subscapular skinfolds were measured using Holtain skinfold callipers (Holtain Ltd, Pembrokeshire, UK) (Wright et al. 2012).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Height and weight were converted into Z scores compared with the UK 1990 (Freeman et al. 1995) and skinfolds to Tanner's reference (Tanner & Whitehouse 1975); BIA measures were converted into Z scores for fat and lean adjusted for height and age, standardised to reference data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood cohort, using a method described earlier (Sherriff et al. 2009).

Separate counts for fruit and vegetable consumption were low on average and upwardly skewed, so the associations with 30‐month liking and exposure was assessed using Spearman's correlations, and the independence of predictors of intake was assessed using two separate multiple logistic regression models, with a binary outcome of ≤1 portion per day versus >1 portion per day. The combined total FV intake was normally distributed, so a linear regression analysis approach could be used to assess the independence of predictors of total FV intake. For the assessment of predictors of intake all multivariable models were constructed by first entering all predictor variables with a P‐value of 0.1 or less on univariate analysis. The least predictive non‐significant variables were then removed sequentially and regression repeated until only significant independent predictors remained in the model. Linear regression was also used to assess the extent to which the association of total FV intake with adiposity was confounded by socio‐demographic factors; for these models, maternal education, Townsend deprivation score and height standard deviation score were forced into the model with total FV.

Results

Table 1 provides a description of the socio‐demographic characteristics of participants, and Fig. 1 details the number included at each stage. Postal questionnaires at 30 m were completed by 456 (49%) parents. The 7–8‐year wave was completed by 550 children; 293 (32%) with 30 m food preference data and a FAST food diary. This subsample was relatively less deprived and more educated than the cohort as a whole, but a substantial proportion of all social strata were still represented (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio‐demographic characteristics of samples in this analysis and of differences between total and subsample

Total sample FV preference and intake subsample p(χ 2)
Number 923 293
Gender % %
Male 50 48
Female 50 52 0.3
Deprived
Yes 49 30
No 51 70 <0.001
T‐score quintile
1 – most affluent 17 27
2 21 24
3 23 23
4 20 15
5 – most deprived 19 11 <0.001
Maternal education
>16/higher 30 40
None/GCSE 70 60 <0.001
Age started solids
<3 m 20 19
3–4 m 73 75
>4 m 7 6 0.9
Breastfeeding duration
Never 49 44
<6 weeks 25 27
>6 weeks 10 12
>4 m 16 17 <0.2

Deprived, lacking either employment, car or own home; T‐score, Townsend score quintile; FV, Fruit and Vegetable; GCSE, General Certificate of Secondary Education.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Number of participants included at each stage.

At age 30 m, the children were reported as liking a median of four vegetables and three fruits of those listed (Table 2). Of the common vegetables, the most popular were carrots and baked beans, and the least popular were onions and lettuce. At 7 years, children ate a median (Inter quartile range) of only 1.3 (0.5 to 2.0) portions of vegetables and 1.0 (0.63 to 1.75) of fruit averaged over 4 days, giving a median total FV intake of 2.5 portions per day (1.5 to 3.5). If fruit juice was included this increased to 3.0 (1.8 to 4.3).

Table 2.

Fruit and vegetable reported by parents in the food preference questionnaire as liked or tried by children aged 30 m

Tried Liked
Vegetables Percentage Percentage
Carrots 98.7 80.8
Baked beans 98.9 77.1
Peas 98.9 77.4
Tomatoes 93.1 48.2
Cabbage 89.4 48.2
Cucumber 85.9 42.4
Lettuce 85.1 30.8
Onions 85.7 29.1
Yam 12.4 7.1
Okra 6.2 2.0
Gourd 5.3 1.3
Fruit
Apples 98.7 89.0
Banana 98.2 84.1
Oranges 96.2 75.7
Tinned peaches 70.2 49.7
Mangoes 39.7 23.0
Lychees 9.3 4.2
Guava 9.6 5.1
Total per child Median (range) Median (range)
Vegetables 8 (0–11) 4 (0–10)
Fruits 4 (0–7) 3 (0–7)

Liking for FV at 30 m was significantly positively associated with intake at 7 years, and the number of FV tried at 30 m was also significantly predictive of FV intake, but not the number of fruits tried (Table 3). When placed together in a linear regression model with total intake as outcome (Table 4), toddler liking for both vegetable and fruit remained independently predictive, while the number tried did not. The combined model predicted around 10% of the variance in later intake (vegetable liked beta = 0.22; fruit liked beta = 0.16; all P < 0.001; adjusted R 2 = 0.10).

Table 3.

Associations between FV reported by parents in food preference questionnaire as liked or tried for children aged 30 m and FV intake aged 7 years. Values are Spearman's Ranked Correlations (r)

7 years, number of portions eaten
Fruit Vegetables Total FV
Age 30 m, number of r P r P r P
Vegetables liked 0.19 0.001 0.31 <0.001 0.28 <0.001
Fruits liked 0.23 <0.001 0.19 0.001 0.25 <0.001
FV liked 0.25 <0.001 0.30 <0.001 0.27 <0.001
Vegetables tried 0.13 0.022 0.15 0.011 0.15 0.012
Fruits tried 0.05 0.42 0.05 0.35 0.07 0.27
FV tried 0.15 0.009 0.10 0.07 0.15 0.007

FV, fruit and vegetable.

Table 4.

Associations of FV liked at age 30 m and FV intake aged 7 with of body composition Z scores at age 7–8. Values are standardised regression coefficients (Beta)

Number BMI Fat (BIA) Skinfolds
Beta P Beta P Beta P
Model one: adjusted for height only
FV liked age 30 m 346a* −0.01 0.86 ‐0.08 0.13 −0.09 0.09
FV eaten age 7 years 292 0.10 0.02 ‐0.11 0.02 −0.15 0.001
Model two: adjusted for height, maternal education and Townsend deprivation score
FV liked age 30 m 341* −0.01 0.84 −0.08 0.13 −0.09 0.09
FV eaten age 7 years 267 −0.07 0.10 −0.08 0.09 −0.10 0.03
*

Skinfolds missing for 27, fat missing for 1;

Skinfolds missing for 21, fat missing for 1;

BMI, body mass index; BIA, bioelectrical impedance; FV, fruit and vegetable.

At age 7 years, intake of FV was weakly inversely related to BMI, BIA fat and skinfolds Z scores. Adjustment for maternal education and deprivation score tended to slightly attenuate the associations, so that only the association with skinfolds remained significant (Table 4). No other significant associations were found.

Appetite at 12 months and 30 m were significantly positively associated with vegetable liking at 30 m, but not later intake (Table 5). The eating score at age 12 m was unrelated to both toddler preferences and later intake (data not shown). Dislike of unfamiliar foods (neophobia) and feeding problems showed significant negative associations with toddler's liking and trying of FV, but only neophobia significantly predicted vegetable and FV intake at 7 years.

Table 5.

Associations of early eating behaviour with FV liked and tried aged 30 m and intake aged 7 years

Median (range) FV liked and tried aged 30 m 7 years FV intake (portions)
6 weeks – appetite Vegetables liked Fruit liked Vegetables tried Fruit tried Vegetables Fruit All FV
All other categories 4 (0–10) 3 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–6.8) 1 (0–4) 2.5 (0–10.3)
Very good 4 (0–10) 4 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (0–7)* 1.3 (0–5) 1 (0–4.3) 2.5 (0–7.5)
12 m – appetite
All other categories 3 (0–8) 3 (0–6) 8 (4–11) 4 (0–7) 1.0 (0–2.3) 1.0 (0–4) 2.3 (0.5–8.3)
Good 4 (0–10) 3 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–4.8) 1.3 (0–4) 2.5 (0–7)
Very good 5 (0–10) 4 (0–7) 8 (4–11) 4 (3–7) 1.25 (0–6.8) 1.1 (0–4) 2.6 (0–10.3)
30 m – appetite
All other categories 4 (0–9) 3 (0–6) 8 (0–11) 4 (0–7) 1.3 (0–5.3) 1 (0–4) 2.5 (0–8.3)
Good 4 (0–10) 3 (0–7) 8 (3–11) 4 (2–7) 1.3 (0–4.8) 1.3 (0–4.3) 2.8 (0–7.5)
Very good 5 (0–10) 4 (0–7) 8 (4–11) 4 (2–7) 1.3 (0–6.8) 1 (0–4) 2.3 (0–10.3)
30 m – unfamiliar foods
Dislikes 3 (0–9) 3 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (0–7) 1 (0–4) 1 (0–4) 2.3 (0–5.8)
Neither likes nor dislikes 4 (0–10) 3 (0–7) 8 (4–11) 4 (2–7) 1.4 (0–4.8) 1.3 (0–3.3) 2.5 (0–7.3)
Likes 5 (0–9) 4 (0–7) 8 (3–11) 4 (2–7) 1.5 (0–6.8)* 1.3 (0–4.3) 2.8 (0–10.3)*
30 m – feeding problems
No 5 (0–10) 4 (0–7) 8 (3–11) 4 (0–7) 1.3 (0–6.8) 1 (0–4.3) 2.5 (0–10.3)
Yes 3 (0–9) 3 (0–6) 8 (0–11) 4 (1–7) 1.1 (0–5) 1 (0–3.8) 2.4 (0–7)
*

P < 0.05;

P < 0.01;

P < 0.001;

Tests used: Mann‐Whitney U‐test for binary variables; Jonckheere trend test for categorical variables.

FV, fruit and vegetable.

Toddler's FV preference and exposure were largely unrelated to socio‐demographic characteristics, and where there were associations, they were inconsistent, with deprived mothers reporting their toddler to like vegetables slightly more, while more educated mother reported greater liking for fruit. At age 7 years, FV intake was higher in more affluent and more educated families. Breast feeding duration and age of complementary feeding showed no association with toddler liking and trying of FV (Table 6).

Table 6.

Associations of socio‐demographic variables and infant feeding with number of FV liked and tried aged 30 m and intake aged years

Median (range) FV liked and tried aged 30 m 7 years FV intake (portions)
Gender Vegetables liked Fruit liked Vegetables tried Fruit tried Vegetables Fruit FV
Male 4 (0–9) 3 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–6.8) 1.0 (0–4) 2.3 (0–10.3)
Female 4 (0–10) 4 (0–7) 8 (4–11)* 4 (0–7) 1.3 (0–4.8) 1.0 (0–4.3) 2.5 (0–7.5)
Deprived
Yes 5 (0–10) 3 (0–7) 8 (4–11) 4 (2–7) 1.0 (0–6.5) 0.8 (0–4) 2.0 (0–9.5)
No 4 (0–10)* 3 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (0–7) 1.3 (0–6.8)* 1.3 (0–4.3) 2.8 (0–10.3)
T‐score quintile
Most affluent 4 (0–9) 3 (0–7) 8 (2–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–6.8) 1.3 (0–4) 2.8 (0.3–10.3)
2 5 (0–9) 4 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–4.8) 1.5 (0–4) 2.8 (0–7.3)
3 4 (0–10) 3.5 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–6.5) 1 (0–4) 2.5 (0–9.5)
4 5 (0–8) 3 (0–6) 8 (4–11) 4 (2–7) 1.0 (0–3.8) 0.8 (0–4.3) 2.0 (0–7.5)
Most deprived 4 (0–9)* 3 (0–6) 8 (4–11) 4 (0–7) 1.0 (0–4)* 0.8 (0–2) 2.0 (0–5.8)
Maternal education
Beyond age 16 5 (0–9) 4 (0–7) 8 (2–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–6.8) 1.3 (0–4) 2.8 (0–10.3)
Up to age 16 only 4 (0–10) 3 (0–7)* 8 (0–11) 4 (0–7) 1.3 (0–6.5) 1 (0–4.3) 2.3 (0–9.5)
Breastfeeding duration
Never 5 (0–10) 3 (0–7) 8 (0–11) 4 (1–7) 1 (0–6.8) 1 (0–4) 2.3 (0–9.5)
<6 weeks 4 (0–10) 4 (0–7) 8 (4–11) 4 (0–7) 1.3 (0–6.8) 1 (0–4) 2.5 (0–10.3)
>6 weeks 4 (0–8) 3 (0–5) 8 (3–11) 4 (3–7) 1.5 (0–4.5) 1 (0.3–4.3) 3 (0.5–7.5)
>4 m 4 (0–9) 3 (0–7) 8 (4–11) 4 (2–7) 1.3 (0–5)* 1.3 (0–3) 2.8 (0.5–6.5)
Age at weaning
<3 m 4 (0–10) 4 (0–5) 8 (4–11) 4 (3–7) 1.3 (0–6.5) 1 (0–4.3) 2.3 (0–9.5)
3–4 m 4 (0–10) 3 (0–7) 8 (2–11) 4 (1–7) 1.3 (0–5.3) 1 (0–4) 2.5 (0–8.3)
>4 m 4 (0–8) 3 (0–7) 8 (0–9) 4 (1–7) 0.8 (0–3.5) 0.9 (0.5–3) 1.9 (0.5–4.5)
*

P < 0.05;

P < 0.01;

P < 0.001;

Tests used: Mann‐Whitney U‐test for binary variables; Jonckheere trend test for categorical variables.

FV, fruit and vegetables; T‐score quintile, Townsend Index score quintile.

In multivariate logistic regression, the number of vegetables liked aged 30 m were the only independent predictors of vegetable consumption at age 7 years (Table 7) while whether breast fed was the only other variable approaching significance (OR = 1.19, P = 0.08).

Table 7.

Results of multivariate models of predictors of intake at age 7 years

Outcome Independent significant predictors in final model Univariate Multivariate
Logistic regression models Odds ratio P Odds ratio P
Intake of >1 portion vegetable per day Number of vegetable liked aged 30 m 1.28 <0.001 1.28 <0.001
Intake of >1 portion fruit per day Number of fruit liked aged 30 m 1.46 <0.001 1.44 <0.001
Relatively deprived 0.49 <0.001 0.34 <0.001
Linear regression model Beta* P Beta P
Total intake of FV Number of vegetables liked 0.28 <0.001 0.24 <0.001
Number of fruit liked 0.25 <0.001 0.13 0.031
Relatively deprived −0.21 <0.001 −0.22 <0.001
*

Standardised regression coefficient;

Mutually adjusted for other significant variables;

FV, fruit and vegetable.

Similarly, liking for fruit aged 30 m was a significant independent predictor of higher fruit intake aged 7 years, but fruit intake was also associated with relative deprivation; liking for vegetables (OR 1.13 P = 0.06) and lower maternal education (OR = 0.64, P = 0.09) were also borderline significant predictors (Table 7). Using multivariate linear regression with total FV intake aged 7–8 years as a continuous outcome, liking for fruit and for vegetables aged 30 m were independent predictors, as well as relative deprivation (Table 7).

Discussion

This study adds to the evidence regarding predictors of FV intake by analysing toddlers' liking and trying of FV in the UK, using longitudinal data from a cohort study. As toddlers, the participants were reported to like eight different vegetables and three fruits. However by age seven, reported intake was about half the recommended level, with a median intake of just 2.5 portions of FV per day.

We hypothesised that children with the highest exposure to and liking for FV at age 2½ years would go on to eat more portions of FV at age 7 years. Toddler liking was strongly associated with later intake, which suggests that an early liking for FV tracks into childhood and influences later intake. This is in keeping with a previous review (Rasmussen et al. 2006) and a smaller US cohort study (Skinner et al. 2002).

Socio‐economic factors are well recognised correlates of FV intake, so it was not surprising that they were the strongest predictor of total FV intake. This has been shown in earlier studies in children (Jones et al. 2010), and FV intake has been shown to decline as food insecurity increases (Kendall et al. 1996). Remarkably, though, there was no clear association between toddler FV liking and socio‐economic factors.

Previous research on this cohort found parental‐rated appetite to be positively related to both weight gain (Wright et al. 2006b) and to total number of foods liked (Wright et al. 2007b), so we hypothesised that children with higher appetite would like and eat more FV, which could have resulted in a spurious positive association between early FV liking and adiposity. However, while evidence was found for an association between appetite at 12 m and 30 m and liking for vegetables, there was no association with later intake; indeed, early liking showed a non‐significant but negative association with adiposity. Parent‐perceived feeding problems and dislike for unfamiliar foods were not surprisingly associated with fewer FV liked and tried as a toddler and dislike for unfamiliar foods also predicted later intake. This is in keeping with a previous study that found food neophobia to be one of the strongest predictors of later food preference (Skinner et al. 2002).

Previous studies have reported positive relationships between breast feeding duration and children's later vegetable intake (Burnier et al. 2011; de Lauzon‐Guillain et al. 2013) and it has been suggested that the mechanism for this could be early flavour learning (Mennella et al. 2001; Mennella et al. 2009; Cooke & Fildes 2011). However, the current study found only a weak association with breastfeeding duration, which became non‐significant after adjustment for deprivation.

We also hypothesised that children with the greatest early liking for FV and the largest intake in childhood would have the lowest level of adiposity. Intake at 7 years was inversely associated with adiposity, and there was a similar non‐significant trend for toddler liking. These were weak effects, but consistent and only slightly attenuated by adjustment for maternal education and deprivation. It has been proposed that increasing FV intake could be as effective as reducing fat and sugar for childhood obesity prevention (Epstein et al. 2001), but there has been little formal research to test this, and the limited research done in children found only weak associations with BMI (Heo et al. 2011)(Heo et al. 2011)(Rolls et al. 2004). This is the first study to examine the association specifically with adiposity, and our findings add some support for increasing FV intake as part of the process of obesity prevention, but also suggest that its effects might not be as substantial as hoped.

The population sample of the GMS provided a large broadly representative sample, but only a third of the sample could be included when linking both the 30‐month questionnaire and the FAST food diary data, which meant that the power to detect influences tracking into childhood was lower than the power to detect infancy influences on toddler preferences. Those in the subsample were more affluent and educated, but all social groups remained reasonably represented, so the comparisons of different subgroups within the cohort should be generalisable to other populations. We tested a large number of potentially predictive variables, so individual significant results must be treated with caution.

The data on foods tried and liked aged 30 m relied on maternal recall, which may have been subject to response bias. The food frequency instrument used had been developed some 15 year earlier (COMA 1989) and as a result may not have included the full range of FV later available to toddlers. It was particularly limited in the range of common fruits, making it probably more informative about vegetable than fruit preferences. However, the common vegetables included were valid, as illustrated by the fact that 85% or more of children had tasted them, suggesting that they did represent a minimum set of vegetables that a toddler could encounter.

While food diaries are often not a good measure of habitual intake and typically overestimate FV consumption (Bingham et al. 1994), the tool used in this study was designed specifically for use by non‐specialists. Completion of FAST diaries required motivation and compliance by parents, but this was minimised by direct observation of children by the research team in school, and we succeeded in obtaining 4‐day food intake data for 80% of those children participating in the 7‐year wave. We did not assess FV contained in composite dishes, which would lead to some underestimation, but it has previously been shown to provide a robust measure of actual FV intake (Adamson et al. 2003). Given the known relationship between FAST estimates and actual intake for this age and gender (Adamson et al. 2003), this implies a median daily intake of just 137 g of solid fruit and vegetables. This low intake in mid‐childhood is consistent with findings from a UK dietary survey (Bates et al. 2012) and in keeping with suggestions that as children get older and more independent, they are more influenced by environmental factors both inside and outside the home (Hetherington et al. 2011).

It might be argued that it is not valid to relate preferences at one age to intake at another. However, infants and toddlers have little scope to choose what foods they eat, making parental rating of liking most useful. In a smaller study liking could be tested by direct observation and experiment, but this is not feasible in large‐scale studies. In contrast, older children do choose what they eat, so what they actually eat is likely to be the most valid measure of food preference, as well as the most meaningful in health terms.

Family environment also influences children's FV intake (Cooke et al. 2004), and the lack of data regarding family intake patterns places limitations on this analysis. Cohort studies have found that maternal preference predicts child food preferences and vegetable variety (Skinner et al. 2002) and maternal consumption and parental eating rules increase intake (Jones et al. 2010). Future analyses, which include family environment influences, would add a further perspective on this investigation.

Children with an early liking for FV did eat more FV later in childhood and this association could not simply be explained by socio‐demographic factors or by feeding and appetite patterns in early life. A deprived child with above average liking for vegetables as a toddler was eating about the same mean number of portions by age 7 years (2.61) as a non‐deprived child with below‐average liking (2.5), but it is also of note that an affluent child with high liking was still eating well short of the recommended five FV portions (3.4). This suggests that the child's liking strongly influences actual intake, independent of the larger food culture they live within. If early liking could be promoted, there would certainly be scope for increasing intake, because those in the top quartile for intake ate more than twice the number of portions than those in the bottom quartile. A more pessimistic view might be that the enduring effect of liking may simply reflect a genetic predisposition to like or avoid bitter or sour foods (Tepper et al. 2009), because in this study, exposure alone was not associated with increased later FV intake. The key question, therefore, is whether the right sort of early exposure can successfully enhance liking in the long term. Repeated exposure to bitter tastes is said to increase liking (Cooke 2007; Maier et al. 2007; Beauchamp & Mennella 2009) and can be effective in increasing vegetable acceptance during complementary feeding (Remy et al. 2013). A recent randomised controlled trial investigating techniques to increase FV intake concluded that behaviour‐specific interventions had the potential to impact later intake (Chapman & Armitage 2012). These are promising approaches, but a recent Cochrane review reported a lack of evidence that interventions to promote FV intake in preschool children actually increased vegetable consumption and only limited evidence on fruit (Wolfenden et al. 2012), so there is a need now to test the long term impact of these intervention approaches.

Conclusions

While intake of FV in mid‐childhood was low, an early liking for vegetables and fruit predicted increased later intake. This suggests that further work to increase early exposure to and liking for vegetables could have long‐term beneficial consequences.

Source of funding

The Gateshead Millennium Study cohort was first established with funding from the Henry Smith Charity and Sport Aiding Research in Kids (SPARKS) and followed up with grants from Gateshead NHS Trust R&D, Northern and Yorkshire NHS R&D, and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Trust. The later work was supported by a grant from the National Prevention Research Initiative (incorporating funding from British Heart Foundation; Cancer Research UK; Department of Health; Diabetes UK; Economic and Social Research Council; Food Standards Agency; Medical Research Council; Research and Development Office for the Northern Ireland Health and Social Services; Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health Directorates; Welsh Assembly Government and World Cancer Research Fund). Ashley Adamson is funded by an NIHR Research Professorship. None of the funding bodies have played any part in the analysis or publication of the findings.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Contributions

SF performed the literature review and analyses and wrote the first draft of the paper. CW planned and supervised the infancy and toddler data collection, supervised the analysis and edited the paper. AJ contributed to the collection of dietary data, processed the FAST diaries and dietary data in preparation for analyses. KP recruited subjects and managed both phases of data collection. AA planned and supervised the 7‐year data collection. All authors have read and commented on drafts of the paper

Acknowledgements

Thanks are especially due to the Gateshead Millennium Study families and children for their participation in the study. We warmly thank the research team for their effort and other members of the Gateshead Millennium Study core team: Anne Dale, Robert Drewett, Ann Le Couteur, Paul McArdle, Mark Pearce and John Reilly. We acknowledge the support of an External Reference Group in conducting the study. We appreciate the support of Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead Education Authority and local schools. Finally, we are grateful to the anonymous reviewers of this paper, whose constructive comments greatly helped the final draft.

Fletcher, S. , Wright, C. , Jones, A. , Parkinson, K. , and Adamson, A. (2017) Tracking of toddler fruit and vegetable preferences to intake and adiposity later in childhood. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13: e12290. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12290.

References

  1. Adamson A.J., Griffiths J.M., Carlin L.E., Barton K.L., Wrieden W.L., Matthews J.N.S. et al. (2003) FAST: Food Assessment in Schools Tool. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62, 84A. [Google Scholar]
  2. Basterfield L., Jones A.R., Parkinson K.N., Reilly J., Pearce M.S., Reilly J.J. et al. (2014) Physical activity, diet and BMI in children aged 6–8 years: a cross‐sectional analysis. BMJ Open 4: e005001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates B., Lennox A., Prentice A.M., Bates C., Page P., Nicholson S. et al. (2014) National Diet and Nutrition Survey Results from Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009 – 2011/2012). Public Health England: London. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates B.L.A., Prentice A., Bates C. & Swann G. (2012) National diet and nutrition survey. Headline results from years 1, 2 and 3. Department of Health and Food Standards Agency: London. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beauchamp G.K. & Mennella J.A. (2009) Early flavor learning and its impact on later feeding behavior. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 48 (Suppl 1), S25–S30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berridge K.C. (2000) Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 24, 173–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bingham S.A., Gill C., Welch A., Day K., Cassidy A., Khaw K.T. et al. (1994) Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food‐frequency questionnaires and estimated‐diet records. The British Journal of Nutrition 72, 619–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Birch L.L. & Fisher J.O. (1998) Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 101, 539–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blossfeld I., Collins A., Boland S., Baixauli R., Kiely M. & Delahunty C. (2007) Relationships between acceptance of sour taste and fruit intakes in 18‐month‐old infants. The British Journal of Nutrition 98, 1084–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burnier D., Dubois L. & Girard M. (2011) Exclusive breastfeeding duration and later intake of vegetables in preschool children. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65, 196–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Caton S.J., Ahern S.M., Remy E., Nicklaus S., Blundell P. & Hetherington M.M. (2013) Repetition counts: repeated exposure increases intake of a novel vegetable in UK pre‐school children compared to flavour‐flavour and flavour‐nutrient learning. The British Journal of Nutrition 109, 2089–2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chapman J. & Armitage C.J. (2012) Do techniques that increase fruit intake also increase vegetable intake? Evidence from a comparison of two implementation intention interventions. Appetite 58, 28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. COMA: Committee on Medical Aspects of Food (1989) The Diets of British School Children: Sub‐committee on Nutritional Surveillance. Department of Health: London. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cooke L. (2007) The importance of exposure for healthy eating in childhood: a review. Journal of Human Nutrition And Dietetics: The Official Journal of the British Dietetic Association 20, 294–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cooke L. & Fildes A. (2011) The impact of flavour exposure in utero and during milk feeding on food acceptance at weaning and beyond. Appetite 57, 808–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cooke L.J. & Wardle J. (2005) Age and gender differences in children's food preferences. The British Journal of Nutrition 93, 741–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cooke L.J., Wardle J., Gibson E.L., Sapochnik M., Sheiham A. & Lawson M. (2004) Demographic, familial and trait predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption by pre‐school children. Public Health Nutrition 7, 295–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Coulthard H., Harris G. & Emmett P. (2010) Long‐term consequences of early fruit and vegetable feeding practices in the United Kingdom. Public Health Nutrition 13, 2044–2051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Lauzon‐Guillain B., Jones L., Oliveira A., Moschonis G., Betoko A., Lopes C. et al. (2013) The influence of early feeding practices on fruit and vegetable intake among preschool children in 4 European birth cohorts. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 98, 804–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Drewett R.F., Corbett S.S. & Wright C.M. (2006) Physical and emotional development, appetite and body image in adolescents who failed to thrive as infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47, 524–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Epstein L.H., Gordy C.C., Raynor H.A., Beddome M., Kilanowski C.K. & Paluch R. (2001) Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obesity Research 9, 171–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Epstein L.H., Paluch R.A., Beecher M.D. & Roemmich J.N. (2008) Increasing healthy eating vs. reducing high energy‐dense foods to treat pediatric obesity. Obesity 16, 318–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Freeman J.V., Cole T.J., Chinn S., Jones P.R.M., White E.M. & Preece M.A. (1995) Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Archives of Disease in Childhood 73, 17–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hausner H., Olsen A. & Moller P. (2012) Mere exposure and flavour‐flavour learning increase 2‐3 year‐old children's acceptance of a novel vegetable. Appetite 58, 1152–1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heo M., Kim R.S., Wylie‐Rosett J., Allison D.B., Heymsfield S.B. & Faith M.S. (2011) Inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and BMI even after controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. Obesity Facts 4, 449–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hetherington M.M., Cecil J.E., Jackson D.M. & Schwartz C. (2011) Feeding infants and young children. From guidelines to practice. Appetite 57, 791–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hetherington M.M., Schwartz C., Madrelle J., Croden F., Nekitsing C., Vereijken C.M. et al. (2015) A step‐by‐step introduction to vegetables at the beginning of complementary feeding. The effects of early and repeated exposure. Appetite 84, 280–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones L., Moschonis G., Oliveira A., de Lauzon‐Guillain B., Manios Y., Xepapadaki P. et al. (2015) The influence of early feeding practices on healthy diet variety score among pre‐school children in four European birth cohorts. Public Health Nutrition 18, 1774–1784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones L.R., Steer C.D., Rogers I.S. & Emmett P.M. (2010) Influences on child fruit and vegetable intake: sociodemographic, parental and child factors in a longitudinal cohort study. Public Health Nutrition 13, 1122–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kendall A., Olson C.M. & Frongillo E.A. Jr. (1996) Relationship of hunger and food insecurity to food availability and consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 96, 1019–1024; quiz 1025‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maier A., Chabanet C., Schaal B., Leathwood P. & Issanchou S. (2007) Food‐related sensory experience from birth through weaning: contrasted patterns in two nearby European regions. Appetite 49, 429–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mennella J.A., Forestell C.A., Morgan L.K. & Beauchamp G.K. (2009) Early milk feeding influences taste acceptance and liking during infancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 90, 780s–788s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mennella J.A., Jagnow C.P. & Beauchamp G.K. (2001) Prenatal and postnatal flavor learning by human infants. Pediatrics 107, art. no.‐e88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nicklaus S., Boggio V., Chabanet C. & Issanchou S. (2004) A prospective study of food preferences in childhood. Food Quality and Preference 15, 805–818. [Google Scholar]
  35. Parkinson K.N., Pearce M.S., Dale A., Reilly J.J., Drewett R.F., Wright C.M. et al. (2011) Cohort profile: the Gateshead Millennium Study. International Journal of Epidemiology 40, 308–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Public‐Health‐England (2013) 5 A DAY: what counts? [Online]. Public Health England. Available: http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/5ADAY/Pages/Whatcounts.aspx (accessed November 2015).
  37. Rasmussen M., Krolner R., Klepp K.I., Lytle L., Brug J., Bere E. et al. (2006) Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part I: Quantitative studies. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 3, 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Remy E., Issanchou S., Chabanet C. & Nicklaus S. (2013) Repeated exposure of infants at complementary feeding to a vegetable puree increases acceptance as effectively as flavor‐flavor learning and more effectively than flavor‐nutrient learning. The Journal of Nutrition 143, 1194–1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Resnicow K., Davis‐Hearn M., Smith M., Baranowski T., Lin L.S., Baranowski J. et al. (1997) Social‐cognitive predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in children. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 16, 272–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rolls B.J., Ello‐Martin J.A. & Tohill B.C. (2004) What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management? Nutrition Reviews 62, 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwartz C., Issanchou S. & Nicklaus S. (2009) Developmental changes in the acceptance of the five basic tastes in the first year of life. The British Journal of Nutrition 102, 1375–1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sherriff A., Wright C.M., Reilly J.J., Mccoll J., Ness A. & Emmett P. (2009) Age‐ and sex‐standardised lean and fat indices derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis for ages 7‐11 years: functional associations with cardio‐respiratory fitness and grip strength. The British Journal of Nutrition 101, 1753–1760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Skinner J.D., Carruth B.R., Wendy B. & Ziegler P.J. (2002) Children's food preferences: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 102, 1638–1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tanner J.M. & Whitehouse R.H. (1975) Revised standards for triceps and subscapular skinfolds in British children. Archives of Disease in Childhood 50, 142–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tepper B.J., White E.A., Koelliker Y., Lanzara C., D'Adamo P. & Gasparini P. (2009) Genetic variation in taste sensitivity to 6‐n‐propylthiouracil and its relationship to taste perception and food selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1170, 126–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Townsend P., Phillimore P. & Beattie A. (1988) Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North. Croom Helm: London. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wolfenden L., Wyse R.J., Britton B.I., Campbell K.J., Hodder R.K., Stacey F.G. et al. (2012) Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged 5 years and under. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11, CD008552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wright C.M., Cox K.M. & Le C.A. (2011) How does infant behaviour relate to weight gain and adiposity? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 70, 485–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wright C.M., Cox K.M., Sherriff A., Franco‐Villoria M., Pearce M.S. & Adamson A.J. (2012) To what extent do weight gain and eating avidity during infancy predict later adiposity? Public Health Nutrition 15, 656–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wright C.M., Parkinson K. & Scott J. (2006a) Breast‐feeding in a UK urban context: who breast‐feeds, for how long and does it matter? Public Health Nutrition 9, 686–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wright C.M., Parkinson K.N. & Drewett R.F. (2004) Why are babies weaned early? Data from a prospective population based cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood 89, 813–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wright C.M., Parkinson K.N. & Drewett R.F. (2006b) How does maternal and child feeding behavior relate to weight gain and failure to thrive? Data from a prospective birth cohort. Pediatrics 117, 1262–1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wright C.M., Parkinson K.N. & Drewett R.F. (2006c) The influence of maternal socioeconomic and emotional factors on infant weight gain and weight faltering (failure to thrive): data from a prospective birth cohort. Archives of Disease in Childhood 91, 312–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wright C.M., Parkinson K.N., Shipton D. & Drewett R.F. (2007a) How do toddler eating problems relate to their eating behavior, food preferences, and growth? Pediatrics 120, e1069–e1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wright C.M., Parkinson K.N., Shipton D. & Drewett R.F. (2007b) How do toddler eating problems relate to their eating behavior, food preferences, and growth? Pediatrics 120, e1069–e1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wright C.M., Stone D.H. & Parkinson K.N. (2010) Undernutrition in British Haredi infants within the Gateshead Millennium Cohort Study. Archives of Disease in Childhood 95, 630–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Maternal & Child Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES