Abstract
In this work the permeability of a model asymmetric plasma membrane, for ions, water and the anti-cancer drugs cisplatin and gemcitabine is studied by means of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. It is shown for the first time that permeability of the highly curved membrane increases from one to three orders of magnitude upon membrane bending depending on the compound and the sign of curvature. Our results suggest that the membrane curvature could be an important factor of drug translocation through the membrane.
Subject terms: Computational biophysics, Membrane structure and assembly, Supramolecular assembly, Drug delivery
Introduction
Passive permeability of cell membranes is of great importance for pharmacology since many drugs are known to permeate spontaneously through the plasma membrane of the target cells. The membranes of real cells are highly heterogeneous and possess regions with very different curvature – from essentially flat to highly curved, such as filopodia, cilia, membrane blebs, caveolae, etc1. Origins of the membrane curvature are diverse and range from spontaneous curvature of the lipids2–4 to the influence of membrane proteins and cytoskeleton5. Membrane curvature is intrinsically connected to the asymmetry of lipid6,7 and cholesterol8–10 content of membrane monolayers.
The shape of the curved membrane surface is described by the mean and Gaussian curvatures11. Mean curvature measures an extent of the average membrane bending, while the Gaussian curvature determines the topological type of the surface (sphere-like, cylinder-like, or saddle-like). In the sake of simplicity in this paper we concentrate on the mean curvature in the membrane with cylindrical geometry, which is bent in a single plane.
Up to now it is not known which regions of the membrane are preferred for drug permeation and whether such preference exists. Moreover, membrane morphologies of normal and malignant cells differ substantially12,13. Malignant cells could have more ragged surface with many membrane blebs and protrusions or, in contrast, be round and featureless in comparison to their normal counterparts. It is not known whether these differences in membrane morphology affect uptake of the drugs by cancer cells.
Being a transient dynamic property of the membrane, which changes in time and in different sites of the cell surface, the curvature is difficult to study experimentally. Particularly studying the influence of curvature on the passive transport of small molecules and drugs through the membrane remains challenging.
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations allow overcoming these difficulties by providing atomistic view of the membrane in completely controllable environment. Recent MD study revealed significant and non-trivial effects of curvature on different membrane properties such as distribution of cholesterol, area per lipid, thickness of the leaflets and the order parameter of the lipid tails14,15. It is plausible that such pronounced curvature-dependent changes in the lipid packing and cholesterol distribution should affect the permeability of the membrane for hydrophilic compounds. However, it is hard to deduce whether permeability increases of decreases upon membrane bending and to what extent.
MD simulations provide unique opportunity of studying diffusion of drugs and small molecules through realistic model membranes in atomic details but, to the best of our knowledge, all existing studies were performed on the planar bilayers only. In order to study the influence of curvature on permeability one has to sample the transmembrane diffusion of the ligand in the parts of the membrane with desired curvature only. There are two ways of achieving this: either by sampling large membrane patch for a long time and selecting the regions with needed curvature, utilizing one of known methods of determining local16 or global17 membrane curvatures, or by maintaining the curvature of the membrane around desired value by artificial restrains. The first approach, while being closer to reality, is currently well beyond the time scales available for all-atom MD simulations. In contrast, the second approach is currently computationally tractable. In our previous work14 we developed an efficient technique of restricting global membrane curvature to any desired value, which does not affect fine-grained dynamics of membrane components and key macroscopic membrane properties.
In this work we used all-atom MD simulations for determining permeability of highly curved membranes for water, ions and small hydrophilic anti-cancer drugs cisplatin and gemcitabine. The usage of high curvature allows detecting curvature-related changes of permeability reliably and in reasonable computational time, however the magnitude of these effects may differ from ones observed in real cells (see Discussion for details). We used a model of mammalian plasma membrane with asymmetric lipid composition and 33% mole fraction of cholesterol. We performed simulations for three values of curvature: 0 nm−1 (flat membrane), 0.2 nm−1 (outer monolayer is convex) and −0.2 nm−1 (inner monolayer is convex) as shown in Fig. 1. The potentials of mean force (PMFs), diffusion coefficients (D) and permeation resistances (R) across the membrane were computed. The dependence of permeability (P) on the curvature for all studied ligands is estimated.
Results
Analysis of the PMFs shows that the energy barriers for all permeating ligands are lower in the curved membrane in comparison to the flat one (Fig. 2) while the magnitude of this effect varies between the ligands (Table 1).
Table 1.
Curvature | Na+ | Cl- | Water | CPT | Gem |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 101.1 | 101.6 | 31.4 | 70.1 | 77.5 |
0.2 | 98.3 (0.97) | 96.4 (0.95) | 30.2 (0.96) | 63.1 (0.90) | 64.8 (0.83) |
−0.2 | 92.7 (0.92) | 93.4 (0.92) | 29.9 (0.95) | 66.7 (0.95) | 67.6 (0.87) |
Values in parentheses show relative height of the barrier with respect to the flat membrane for particular ligand.
The peaks of the PMFs shift systematically towards concave monolayer (Fig. S1, see Supplementary Information for definition of the peak position). Such shift is expected since the convex monolayer has larger area per lipid and looser packing of the lipids than the flat membrane while the concave monolayer is more densely packed14 and imposes higher barrier on the permeant.
The diffusion coefficients of the ligands change consistently upon the membrane bending (Fig. 3). For all ligands except Gem the D is lower for the concave monolayer in comparison to the flat membrane which reflects more congested environment in this monolayer. In the case of Gem the changes of D are small and do not allow to deduce obvious trend from them.
The absolute values of D do not change much upon bending within 1 nm from the center of the membrane. The maximal change in this area is about 1.5 times for all ligands. Much larger variations are observed in the regions of lipid head groups and bulk solvent. In order to estimate the influence of these regions on total permeability we analyzed the membrane resistance R (Fig. S2). For all studied ligands resistance drops by several orders of magnitude at the distance of ~1 nm from the membrane center (note the log scale in Fig. S2) thus the changes of D outside this region has almost no effect on permeability. This suggests that the permeability will depend only slightly on D and the shape and height of the PMF plays the major role.
Permeability coefficients P of the ligands are summarized in Table 2. There is a systematic trend, which is consistent with the changes of PMFs upon bending. The P of all ligands increases upon membrane bending. For Na+ and Cl− ions this increase is much larger for negative curvature (when inner monolayer in convex). For water the effect is comparable for positive and negative curvatures. For CPT and Gem the decrease of P is much larger for positive curvature (when inner monolayer in concave). Comparison with Table 1 shows that the permeability follows exactly the same trend as the decrease of the energy barrier observed on PMFs in curved membranes.
Table 2.
Curvature, nm−1 | 0 | 0.2 | −0.2 |
---|---|---|---|
Water | 2.5∙10−6 ± 3.6∙10−8 |
5.5∙10−6 ± 7.2∙10−8 (2.1) |
3.7∙10−6 ± 5.3∙10−8 (1.5) |
Na+ | 1.5∙10−17 ± 1.2∙10−18 |
8.4∙10−17 ± 6.9∙10−18 (5.3) |
1.7∙10−15 ± 1.3∙10−16 (107.5) |
Cl- | 4.6∙10−17 ± 2.4∙10−18 |
1.5∙10−16 ± 8.7∙10−18 (3.2) |
6.4∙10−16 ± 3.3∙10−17 (13.8) |
CPT | 2.3∙10−12 ± 6.2∙10−14 |
5.0∙10−11 ± 1.6∙10−12 (22.1) |
7.0∙10−12 ± 3.1∙10−13 (3.0) |
Gem | 8.3∙10−14 ± 3.6∙10−15 |
1.4∙10−11 ± 4.2∙10−13 (164.5) |
4.5∙10−12 ± 1.5∙10−13 (53.7) |
Numbers in parentheses show the ratio of permeability in comparison to zero curvature for particular ligand.
There is no obvious dependence of the absolute change of permeability on the size or chemical nature of the ligand. For example, the absolute change for Na+ ions is one order of magnitude larger than for Cl− ions for positive curvature, but they are of the same order of magnitude for the negative curvature.
Discussion
The main message which could be inferred from our data is that the membrane curvature increases permeability of the membranes with asymmetric lipid content for water, ions and anti-cancer drugs cisplatin and gemcitabine. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of the curvature dependence of membrane permeability and the first dedicated simulation setup, which allows studying this phenomenon. Since this work is pioneering in the field, our first goal was to demonstrate an existence of the effect of curvature on passive transport of various hydrophilic compounds. The value of curvature used in this work is probably larger than typically observed in real membranes (see discussion below) but it makes simulations computationally tractable, clearly demonstrates an existence of the effect and its sign. It also provides a solid reference for the future studies, where the effects could be more subtle and harder to interpret due to smaller curvatures.
We observed increase of permeability up to three orders of magnitude depending on the direction of bending and the permeating ligand. Particularly, the difference in permeability in respect to the flat membrane reaches ~160 times for gemcitabine and ~22 times for cisplatin. Even if this effect would be weaker in real cells with smaller membrane curvature it allow us speculating that the most of passive transport of these drugs is likely to occur in highly curved regions of their membrane. It also suggests that the changes of membrane curvature in malignant cells may contribute to the drug uptake and resistance, which opens new perspectives for further research and possible practical applications.
The note on the magnitude of membrane curvature
The absolute values of the plasma membrane curvature in real cells are rarely reported in the literature thus most of the data in this domain come from model experiments and numerical simulations. The curvatures of 0.01–0.035 nm−1 are reported for invaginations induced by the protein toxins18,19, viral capsid proteins20 and annexins21. F-BAR domain proteins may induce curvature up to 0.05–0.1 nm−1 22. Synaptic vesicles and cell organelles are known to have the curvature up to 0.066 nm−1 23,24. Even larger curvatures seem to appear in the membranes transiently. The undulation spectrum of the model lipid bilayers extend to the short wavelengths corresponding to transient curvatures as large as 0.1–0.2 nm−1 both in all-atom25 and coarse-grained simulations26. Significantly curved membrane structures may also form spontaneously in highly asymmetric bilayers17 and during membrane remodeling, such as fusion and vesicle budding1,27.
The most typical radii of curvature in the range of hundreds of nm are hard to access in atomistic MD simulations due to very large size of the simulation box and small magnitudes of all curvature-related effects, which require prohibitively large simulation times. The extreme curvatures of 0.1–0.2 nm−1 seems to be less common in real cells but still of significant interest. In addition to their possible direct role in cellular phenomena high curvatures provide an excellent reference point at which all curvature-related effects are clearly visible. In this work we used large curvature of 0.2 nm−1 which is unlikely to be commonly observed in real membranes but makes all-atom simulations tractable and allows to detect curvature-related changes of permeability with good confidence. This is especially important providing current limitations of the MD methodology of computing permeabilities, described below and in the Supporting Information. Large uncertainties in computed PMFs and diffusion coefficients could make detection of the subtle effects of smaller realistic curvatures problematic without prohibitive computational efforts.
Methodology of computing permeability and its limitations
In our study we rely on pragmatic usage of the inhomogeneous solubility-diffusion (ISD) model28,29. We are aware about serious limitations of this approach and never compare different ligands with each other in terms of absolute values of permeability or translocation energy barriers. However, we compare the values for the same ligand in the same membrane but with different curvatures. Any systematic errors should be very similar in such simulations, which makes them directly comparable to each other (see detailed discussion in Supplementary Information).
The curved membranes used in this study were validated extensively in our previous works14,30. It was demonstrated that the dummy particles, which maintain the membrane shape, have minimal influence on the membrane structure and dynamics of individual lipids14. It was also shown that the PMFs of multiple permeating ligands located in different regions of complex multicomponent membrane provide sufficient sampling for making reliable semi-quantitative conclusions30. That is why we are convinced that obtained trends are robust and reflect real influence of the membrane curvature on its permeability for small hydrophilic compounds and drugs. We are aware that the magnitude of these effects at high curvature of 0.2 nm−1 is likely to be larger than at moderate curvatures of 0.01–0.05 nm−1 commonly observed in real membranes. Thus obtained results should not be treated as quantitative for real cells.
Future directions
To our knowledge this work is the first report of the curvature-dependent permeability of the hydrophilic compounds in the lipid membranes with realistic lipid composition. Our simulations reveal this effect clearly but currently shed no light on its molecular mechanism. Future studies should concentrate on the exact role of different lipid species and cholesterol content on the permeability in curved membranes. More realistic curvatures of 0.01–0.05 nm−1 should be used to make the results closer to typical membranes of real cells, which require further methodological development to make such simulations computationally tractable.
Materials and Methods
All simulations were performed using GROMACS software31, versions 5.1.2 and 2018.2. The slipids force field32 is used for lipids in combination with AMBER99sb force field for water and the ions. All simulations were performed in NPT conditions with Parrinello-Rahman barostat at 1 atm and velocity rescale thermostat33 at 320 K. Such temperature ensures liquid state of our cholesterol-rich membrane, speeds up equilibration of the system and enhances sampling. The group cutoff scheme was used34. An integration step of 1 fs was used for cisplatin (as required by its flexible topology35) and 2 fs for all other ligands. For simulations with 2 fs time step all bonds were converted to rigid constraints. Long range electrostatics was computed with the PME method36. Preparation of the systems and data analysis was performed with Pteros 2.0 molecular modeling library37,38. VMD 1.9.3 was used for visualization39.
Topologies of water and ions were taken from AMBER99sb force field. Topologies of cisplatin and gemcitabine were developed and tested in our previous works35,40 respectively. The QDSol topology of cisplatin was used35.
The simulation setup for curved asymmetric membranes developed in our previous works14,41 was used. The membrane is prepared as a bicelle which is limited by semi-cylindrical caps in XZ plane and forms an infinite bilayer in Y direction (Fig. 1). When the curvature is imposed on the membrane the areas of concave and convex monolayers become different and the lipids redistribute through the caps of the bicelle in order to compensate for resulting mechanical strain. The caps serve as “compensating reservoirs” which store excessive lipids from concave monolayer and donate the lipids to convex monolayer. This setup has shown robust performance in both coarse-grained and atomistic simulations14,41.
Table 3 shows the lipid content of the monolayers designed according to well-established lipid content of mammalian erythrocyte membranes42. Phosphatidylinositol was not included into simulations due to its small concentration, which results in about one molecule per system.
Table 3.
Component | Outer monolayer | Inner monolayer |
---|---|---|
SM (sphingomyelin) | 42 | 12 |
PC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) | 46 | 14 |
PE (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine) | 14 | 46 |
PS (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine) | 0 | 30 |
Cholesterol | 51 | 51 |
Initial cholesterol distribution is shown.
The mixing of the lipids from different monolayers in the regions of bicelle caps is prevented by imposing selective artificial repulsive potentials developed in our previous works14,16,41,43.
We use the method of keeping global membrane curvature at given value by shaping the membrane by means of dummy particles14. In brief the idea is to put the membrane between two repulsive surfaces of artificial particles (the walls) which scaffold the global shape of membrane but do not affect lateral dynamics of individual lipids.
The system is pre-equilibrated as a bilayer with periodic boundary conditions for 10 ns and then converted to a bicelle by adding extra layers of water from both sides in X direction. After that the restricting walls are added and the system is equilibrated as a planar bicelle for ~250 ns. After that the bending procedure was applied by moving the wall particles gradually as described in details in Supplementary Information. The systems with the curvatures of 0.2 nm−1 and −0.2 nm−1 (Fig. 1) were used for production simulations.
The inhomogeneous diffusion (ISD) model was used to compute permeabilities of the ligands. The umbrella sampling simulations were used to compute the potentials of means force and the diffusion coefficients of the ligands across the membrane.
The details for all the steps of system preparation, simulation, analysis and error estimation are provided in Supplementary Information.
Conclusions
It is shown that permeability of the asymmetric lipid membrane, which mimics the composition of mammalian plasma membrane, for ions, water, cisplatin and gemcitabine strongly depends on the curvature. Highly curved membrane with the curvature of 0.2 nm−1 is one to three orders of magnitude more permeable for ions water, cisplatin and gemcitabine in comparison to flat one depending on the permeating compound and the sign of curvature. Our results show that high membrane curvature should not be neglected during evaluation of the membrane permeability for hydrophilic drugs. Further research is necessary to elucidate the role of membrane curvature modulation in cancer cells in the mechanisms of drug uptake and resistance due to curvature-dependent permeability of the common anti-cancer drugs.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreements No. 690853 and No. 796245. The computational studies work was performed using HPC resources from GENCI-[TGCC/CINES/IDRIS] (Grant 2018-[A0050710578]), the Centre de calcul Champagne-Ardenne Romeo and the Mésocentre de calcul de Franche-Comté.
Author contributions
S.Y. and C.R. designed the study. S.Y. developed simulation methodology. S.Y. and T.R. developed software for data analysis, performed simulations, analyzed and visualized data. C.R. guided discussion and interpretation of the results. The manuscript was written by S.Y. and C.R.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-53952-2.
References
- 1.McMahon HT, Gallop JL. Membrane curvature and mechanisms of dynamic cell membrane remodelling. Nature. 2005;438:590–596. doi: 10.1038/nature04396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chernomordik L, Kozlov MM, Zimmerberg J. Lipids in biological membrane fusion. J. Membarin Biol. 1995;146:1–14. doi: 10.1007/bf00232676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kamal MM, Mills D, Grzybek M, Howard J. Measurement of the membrane curvature preference of phospholipids reveals only weak coupling between lipid shape and leaflet curvature. PNAS. 2009;106:22245–22250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907354106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martens S, McMahon HT. Mechanisms of membrane fusion: disparate players and common principles. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2008;9:543–556. doi: 10.1038/nrm2417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mim C, Unger VM. Membrane curvature and its generation by BAR proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2012;37:526–533. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kiessling, V., Wan, C. & Tamm, L. K. Domain coupling in asymmetric lipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta1788, 64–71, S0005-2736(08)00294-0 [pii], 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.09.003 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Demchenko AP, Yesylevskyy SO. Nanoscopic description of biomembrane electrostatics: results of molecular dynamics simulations and fluorescence probing. Chem Phys Lipids. 2009;160:63–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ali, M. R., Cheng, K. H. & Huang, J. Assess the nature of cholesterol-lipid interactions through the chemical potential of cholesterol in phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA104, 5372–5377, 0611450104 [pii], 10.1073/pnas.0611450104 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Radhakrishnan, A. & McConnell, H. Condensed complexes in vesicles containing cholesterol and phospholipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA102, 12662–12666, 0506043102 [pii], 10.1073/pnas.0506043102 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Ohvo-Rekila, H., Ramstedt, B., Leppimaki, P. & Slotte, J. P. Cholesterol interactions with phospholipids in membranes. Prog Lipid Res41, 66–97, S0163782701000200 [pii] (2002). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.de Carmo, M. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. (Englewood Cliffs, 1976).
- 12.Babahosseini H, Carmichael B, Strobl JS, Mahmoodi SN, Agah M. Sub-cellular force microscopy in single normal and cancer cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2015;463:587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li QS, Lee GYH, Ong CN, Lim CT. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2008;374:609–613. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yesylevskyy SO, Rivel T, Ramseyer C. The influence of curvature on the properties of the plasma membrane. Insights from atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:16078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16450-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yesylevskyy SO, Demchenko AP. How cholesterol is distributed between monolayers in asymmetric lipid membranes. Eur Biophys J. 2012;41:1043–1054. doi: 10.1007/s00249-012-0863-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yesylevskyy S, Ramseyer C. Determination of mean and Gaussian curvatures of highly curved asymmetric lipid bilayers: the case study of the influence of cholesterol on the membrane shape. PCCP. 2014;16:17052–17061. doi: 10.1039/C4CP01544D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yesylevskyy SO, Kraszewski S, Ramseyer C. Determination of the shape and curvature of nonplanar lipid bilayers that are bent in a single plane in molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 2014;20:2176. doi: 10.1007/s00894-014-2176-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pezeshkian W, Nåbo LJ, Ipsen JH. Cholera toxin B subunit induces local curvature on lipid bilayers. FEBS Open Bio. 2017;7:1638–1645. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pezeshkian W, et al. Membrane invagination induced by Shiga toxin B-subunit: from molecular structure to tube formation. Soft Matter. 2016;12:5164–5171. doi: 10.1039/c6sm00464d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Boye TL, et al. Annexins induce curvature on free-edge membranes displaying distinct morphologies. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:10309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28481-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kociurzynski R, Beck SD, Bouhon J-B, Römer W, Knecht V. Binding of SV40’s Viral Capsid Protein VP1 to Its Glycosphingolipid Receptor GM1 Induces Negative Membrane Curvature: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Langmuir. 2019;35:3534–3544. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu Z, Su M, Tong C, Wu M, Liu J. Membrane shape-mediated wave propagation of cortical protein dynamics. Nature Communications. 2018;9:136. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02469-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McMahon HT, Kozlov MM, Martens S. Membrane Curvature in Synaptic Vesicle Fusion and Beyond. Cell. 2010;140:601–605. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jarsch IK, Daste F, Gallop JL. Membrane curvature in cell biology: An integration of molecular mechanisms. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2016;214:375–387. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201604003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bradley RP, Radhakrishnan R. Curvature–undulation coupling as a basis for curvature sensing and generation in bilayer membranes. PNAS. 2016;113:E5117–E5124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605259113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Terzi MM, Deserno M. Novel tilt-curvature coupling in lipid membranes. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2017;147:084702. doi: 10.1063/1.4990404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bonifacino JS, Glick BS. The Mechanisms of Vesicle Budding and Fusion. Cell. 2004;116:153–166. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01079-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berendsen HJC, Marrink SJ. Molecular dynamics of water transport through membranes: Water from solvent to solute. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1993;65:2513–2520. doi: 10.1351/pac199365122513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marrink S-J, Berendsen HJC. Simulation of water transport through a lipid membrane. J. Phys. Chem. 1994;98:4155–4168. doi: 10.1021/j100066a040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rivel T, Ramseyer C, Yesylevskyy S. The asymmetry of plasma membranes and their cholesterol content influence the uptake of cisplatin. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:5627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41903-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008;4:435–447. doi: 10.1021/ct700301q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jämbeck JPM, Lyubartsev AP. Derivation and Systematic Validation of a Refined All-Atom Force Field for Phosphatidylcholine Lipids. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2012;116:3164–3179. doi: 10.1021/jp212503e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2007;126:014101. doi: 10.1063/1.2408420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Páll S, Hess B. A flexible algorithm for calculating pair interactions on SIMD architectures. Computer Physics Communications. 2013;184:2641–2650. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yesylevskyy S, et al. Empirical force field for cisplatin based on quantumdynamics data: case study of new parameterization scheme for coordinationcompounds. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 2015;21:268. doi: 10.1007/s00894-015-2812-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Van der Spoel D, et al. GROMACS: Fast, Flexible and Free. J. Comp. Chem. 2005;26:1701–1718. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yesylevskyy SO. Pteros: Fast and easy to use open-source C++ library for molecular analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2012;33:1632–1636. doi: 10.1002/jcc.22989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yesylevskyy SO. Pteros 2.0: Evolution of the fast parallel molecular analysis library for C++ and python. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2015;36:1480–1488. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Molec. Graphics. 1996;14:33–38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yesylevskyy SO, Ramseyer C, Savenko M, Mura S, Couvreur P. Low-Density Lipoproteins and Human Serum Albumin as Carriers of Squalenoylated Drugs: Insights from Molecular Simulations. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2018;15:585–591. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cherniavskyi YK, Ramseyer C, Yesylevskyy SO. Interaction of C60 fullerenes with asymmetric and curved lipid membranes: a molecular dynamics study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2016;18:278–284. doi: 10.1039/c5cp05838d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Daleke DL. Regulation of phospholipid asymmetry in the erythrocyte membrane. Current Opinion in Hematology. 2008;15:191–195. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282f97af7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yesylevskyy S, Demchenko A. How cholesterol is distributed between monolayers in asymmetric lipid membranes. Eur Biophys J. 2012;41:1043–1054. doi: 10.1007/s00249-012-0863-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.