Abstract
Osteopontin (OPN) is a matricellular protein that is produced by multiple tissues in our body and is most abundant in bone. It is also produced by cancer cells and plays a determinative role in the growth, progression and metastasis of cancer. Clinically, OPN has been reported to be upregulated in tumor cells per se; this is also reflected by increased levels of OPN in the circulation. Thus, increased OPN levels in the plasma are an effect of tumor growth and progression. Functionally, high OPN levels are determinative of higher incidence of bone metastases in mouse models and are clinically correlated with metastatic bone disease and bone resorption in advanced breast cancer patients. Several research efforts have been made to therapeutically target and inhibit the activities of OPN. In this article we have reviewed OPN in its role as an effector of critical steps in tumor progression and metastasis, with a particular emphasis on its role in facilitating bone metastasis of breast cancer. We have also addressed the role of the host-derived OPN in influencing the malignant behavior of the tumor cells.
Keywords: Osteopontin, cancer, bone, metastasis, secreted phosphoprotein 1
Metastasis is a complicated process that involves several steps, including detachment from the primary tumor, penetration of the extracellular matrix (ECM), survival in the circulatory system, extravasation, attachment at the site of metastasis, and establishment of a microenvironment conducive to growth [1–6]. There is evidence suggesting that the protein product of the proto-oncogene, osteopontin (OPN) may play a role in each critical step of the process of metastasis. OPN, an acidic phosphoglycoprotein, with an arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) integrin-binding motif, is a member of the SIBLING (Small integrin-binding ligand N-linked glycoproteins) family which includes five members of secreted proteins that can modulate cell behavior by autocrine as well as paracrine mechanisms by their interaction with cell surface receptors such as integrins [7]. OPN protein is a monomer, ranging in length from 264 to 301 amino acids that undergoes extensive posttranslational modification; including phosphorylation, glycosylation, and cleavage, resulting in molecular mass variants ranging from 25 to 75 kDa. OPN contains a hydrophobic leader sequence characteristic of a secreted protein, a potential calcium phosphate apatite binding region of consecutive asparagine residues, a cell attachment GRGDS sequence, a thrombin cleavage site, and two glutamines that are recognized substrates for transglutaminase-supported multimer formation [8–11]. Through the receptor binding motifs on itself and its receptors, OPN mediates cell-matrix and cell-cell communication [12–14]. Integrin binding with OPN brings about clustering and activation of focal adhesion complexes. These comprise a number of regulatory and structural proteins like FAK, src and other cytoskeletal proteins [15–19]. As a consequence several signal transduction pathways are turned on which culminate in change of cellular properties like adhesion, proliferation, migration and survival (Fig. 1).
Fig. (1).
Schematic representation of the signaling pathways influenced by osteopontin. The phenotypes manifest as increased ability of cells to proliferate, migrate, survive and influence the development of tumor vasculature.
OPN can exist as an immobilized extracellular matrix molecule in mineralized tissue and/or in an intracellular, perimembranous location. Intracellular OPN is part of a hyaluronan-CD44-ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) attachment complex involved in fibroblast, macrophage, and tumor cell migration, suggesting that OPN stimulates or participates in motogenic activity of cells [20–22]. OPN also exists as a cytokine in body fluids. OPN has also been found on epithelial cells and in secretions of the gastrointestinal tract [23], kidneys [24, 25], thyroid [26], breast [27–30], uterus [25], placenta [31–35], and testes [34, 35]. OPN is also expressed by leukocytes [36–38], smooth muscle cells [36–38], and highly metastatic cancer cells [39–53].
OSTEOPONTIN IN THE CLINIC - AN EFFECT OF TUMOR METASTASIS
While OPN is expressed by several cell types and functions in a variety of physiological roles, OPN expression is upregulated in tumor cells. Clinical studies have also revealed a correlation between plasma OPN, tumor burden and prognosis in patients with breast cancer metastasis [54–67]. Abundant secretion of OPN acts as a marker for advanced breast cancer and multiple cancer histotypes [56–67]. The level of plasma OPN in patients with breast cancer is higher compared with levels in plasma from controls (Fig. 2). Since OPN is expressed by both tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as well as the tumor cells themselves, OPN expression specifically within the tumor cells correlated with patient survival (86–96). Studies have shown a correlation between OPN and the progression and severity of multiple cancers, including breast [63, 68–71], colon [72, 73], lung [73, 74], and prostate [40, 75]. OPN has repeatedly been shown to be present at high levels in the circulation of patients with metastatic cancers [55, 70, 75–78] and in tumors with increased metastatic potential [75, 79–82], thus making it relevant in the context of studying its expression in the perspective of metastasis. The levels of OPN in the plasma of patients with breast cancer are significantly higher in those with bone metastasis compared to those who do not have bone metastasis [75, 83]. Moreover, this level of OPN increases with time, as the disease progresses. Among these women, those with highest levels of OPN (more than 2.5 μg/ml) show poor survival compared to those with OPN levels between 1.1–2.5 μg/ml (Fig. 3). Whether the circulating OPN impacts ‘homing’ of breast cancer cells to bone is still not known.
Fig. (2).
As compared to healthy women, women with metastatic breast cancer have higher median levels of circulating osteopontin.
(Data adapted with permission from Clin Cancer Res 3: 605–611, 1997).
Fig. (3).
(A) Temporal increase in the level of plasma OPN in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. (B) In patients with bone metastasis of breast cancer, higher OPN plasma levels are associated with poor survival.
(Data adapted with permission from Endocrine-Related Cancer 11:771–779, 2004).
Alternate splicing of the OPN message yields three messages, OPN-a, OPN-b and OPN-c. The Weber laboratory [84] have identified that the isoform OPN-c, is selectively expressed in invasive, but not in non-invasive, breast tumor cell lines, and it effectively supports anchorage independence. They have further showed in a cohort of 178 breast specimens, that OPN-c is expressed in 78% of cancers, 36% of surrounding tissues and 0% of normal tissues. When correlated with tumor grade, the staining for OPN-c increased from grade 1 to grade 3. Their study reported that in conjunction with HER-2, OPN-c could reliably predict grade 2–3 breast cancer. Thus, it likely that OPN-c may have diagnostic value when coupled with a conventional panel of breast cancer biomarkers.
OPN AS AN EFFECTOR OF TUMOR METASTASIS
Overall OPN signaling acts to enhance malignancy by giving the cells a survival/growth advantage. OPN also augments attributes that confer increased aggressiveness by activating expression of genes and functions that contribute to metastasis [14, 85–90]. As summarized below, tumor cell-derived OPN orchestrates several key steps in tumor development and progression; it does so by changing the microenvironment of cancer cells and temporally and spatially facilitating the critical events that regulate the malignant behavior of the tumor cells. We have used the bone as a site of culmination of the cascade of events that a metastatic breast cancer cell goes through (Fig. 4). Discussed below are 6 critical events in tumor progression and metastasis that are influenced by tumor cell-derived OPN.
Fig. (4).
Osteopontin plays a role in the critical steps of tumor progression and metastasis. Depicted in this cartoon are the steps in metastasis culminating in colonization at the bone as a secondary site.
Prevention of Apoptosis
Tumor cells are distinct from normal cells in that they lack the fine balance between proliferation and apoptosis. Changes reported in most of the molecular players in the apoptotic signal cascade attest to the strong selective pressure during tumor progression for the ability of cancer cells to resist apoptotic cell death [91]. In fact, this acquired ability of cancer cells is an essential trait in tumor progression. Research from our laboratory showed that depletion of OPN from cancer cells abrogates their ability to form tumors, under experimental conditions, in athymic nude mice [92]. Under experimental conditions, overexpression of OPN caused activation of Akt via phosphorylation of Akt at Ser 473 and endowed cancer cells with the ability to resist the stress of growth under serum starvation conditions [19]. Cook et al. [85] have reported that OPN also likely activates the Akt pathway by mediating the upregulation of GAS6, ultimately resulting in evasion of apoptosis.As documented by Lee et al., the interaction of OPN with its receptor CD44 activates inside-out signaling mediated by Src. This confers enhanced ability to resist and survive u.v. induced apoptosis [93].
Recruitment of Tumor Vasculature
The continued growth of the tumor is dependent on the recruitment and establishment of a vascular supply. The association of OPN with this process is a consequence of its ability to bind the αvβ3 integrin which is expressed in neovascular endothelial cells [94]. OPN plays a key role in vascular repair and regeneration and also upregulates the expression of VEGFs. Experimentally, constitutive overexpression of OPN in murine neuroblastoma cells induced neovascularization in vivo [95–99]. OPN has also been reported to upregulate the expression of two members of the CCN (CTGF/Cyr61/NOV) family, cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). CYR61 has functionally been demonstrated to enhance neovascularization and tumor growth in vivo (in model systems) [85]. It is likely that both, OPN and CYR61 act via the αvβ3 receptors on the surface of endothelial and tumor cells to enhance vascularization. Khan et al. reported that OPN prevents apoptosis in endothelial cells via NF-κB [100]. OPN seems to play a role in the formation of the lumen during the neovascularization process as well [101]. In bone, soluble (tumor-derived) OPN plays a vital role in the establishment of vasculature by mediating adhesion to endothelial cells, co-operating with VEGF, and preventing apoptosis of the endothelial cells [96, 99, 102–105].
Adhesion and Migration of Tumor Cells
Usually cells adhere to OPN via integrins. Aberrant integrin expression on cancer cells allows them to chemotactically migrate towards OPN. Breast cancer cell lines migrate toward OPN [106–108], and increasing OPN expression in these cells often correlates with increased Matrigel invasiveness. Conversely, studies including our own have shown that cells that are deficient for OPN expression often display decreased motility when compared to their OPN-expressing counterparts [20, 92, 109]. OPN-mediated migration can involve numerous integrins, including αvβ1, αvβ5 [110, 111], α4β1 [112], α9β1 [113], α8β1 [114]. However, the integrin heterodimer most commonly associated with the malignant properties of OPN is αvβ3 [94, 115–117]. This integrin is invariably expressed in bone metastases while its expression is variable in primary breast tumors [118]. The human metastatic cancer cell line, MDA-MB-435 [119–122] produces copious amounts of OPN and migrates towards OPN via the αvβ3 integrin, while the two non-metastatic human breast cancer cell lines, 21PT and 21NT that do not express αvβ3, use αvβ1, and αvβ5 integrins [123]. Certain splice variants of the cell surface proteoglycan CD44 (CD44v3-v6) can also bind OPN in an RGD-dependent manner [124, 125]. The role of CD44 in influencing cancer cell behavior was demonstrated by Gunthert and colleagues who reported that overexpressing CD44v6 is sufficient to induce full metastatic behavior in pancreatic tumor cells that are normally nonmetastatic [126]. And conversely, fibroblasts from OPN−/− mice have defective CD44-dependent adhesion and migration [20]. In fact, the β1 integrin can influence the behavior of cancer cells to spread and migrate when OPN is bound by CD44 variants [127]. The integrin-induced migration of cells in response to OPN is mediated by the growth factor pathways involving HGF, its receptor Met and EGF [123, 128]. Specifically, OPN-integrin induced cell migration was accompanied by an initial increase in Met kinase activity, followed by an increase in the protein levels of c-Met [123]. There is also evidence to suggest that OPN may impact cell motility via its interactions with focal adhesion complexes (FAC) [16, 129]. Thus, OPN plays a direct role in influencing the behavior of cancer cells by participating in several cell migration pathways.
Invasion of Extracellular Matrix
In order to penetrate its underlying basement membrane a tumor needs to be able to produce the necessary proteases, often members of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family. OPN seems to be capable of increasing the cells’ production of several proteases. Philip et al. [130] demonstrated that treatment of murine melanoma cells with human OPN increased levels of membrane type 1 MMP, pro-MMP2, and active MMP2. MMP2 is capable of degrading some components of the ECM and correlates with invasiveness and metastasis [131]. Breast cell lines that were either transfected or treated with OPN developed increased expression and activity of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) [107]. uPA is capable of directly or indirectly converting plasminogen to plasmin and activating MMP-1, −2, −3, −9, and −14 [57, 132, 133], each of which digests specific ECM components while nearly all play role in cancer invasion and metastasis. Over-expression of uPA in rat prostate cancer cells was enough to increase bone metastasis [134]. The upregulation of uPA and MMP-2 by OPN is mediated by integrin linked kinase (ILK) and AP-1 signaling during tumor cell invasion. The ability of OPN to cause proteolysis is further enhanced by thrombin cleavage of OPN. The thrombin cleaved COOH terminal fragment of OPN binds cyclophilin C to the CD 147 cell surface receptor and enhances ECM proteolysis via activation of Akt1/2 and MMP-2 [135]. Thus, OPN signaling activates a multitude of events that enable cancer cells to degrade the ECM and escape from the primary site.
Evasion of Host Defense
The journey from primary tumor to site of distant metastasis is a perilous one and only a very small percentage of cells survive. A cell must be capable of persisting in an anchorage-independent state and evading the immune system. There is experimental evidence supporting a role for tumor cell-derived OPN in both areas. Breast tumor cells expressing OPN are capable of anchorage-independent growth as determined in soft agar assays [136]. Conversely, abrogating the expression of OPN retards the ability of breast cancer cells to grow under-anchorage-independent conditions [92]. Breast cancer cell lines, such as MCF7, become more resistant to apoptosis when OPN is bound to its cell surface αvβ3 integrin [137]. This anti-apoptotic effect has also been seen in epithelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, hemopoietic cells, and immune cells [138–142]. The OPN-dependent resistance to apoptosis can span several different stress conditions. OPN inhibits the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in infiltrating immune cells blocking certain tumoricidal functions of these cells [143–145]. Recently, Wai et al. [145], blocked OPN in a murine colon adenocarcinoma cell line, and detected an increase in macrophage iNOS expression along with increased NO-mediated tumor cell apoptosis. OPN is also capable of binding factor H, thus protecting tumor cells from complement-mediated lysis [146]. Taken together this shows tumor-derived OPN would provide a strong immune avoidance advantage to tumors capable of its expression, which may more than compensate for the increased levels of immune cells that will be attracted to the OPN present in the tumor.
Growth at the Secondary Site (Bone)
We have exemplified this critical step using the bone as the secondary site since metastasis to the bone is the most catastrophic complication of breast cancer, occurring in 60–83% of advanced breast cancer patients [147–149]. A tumor cell that possesses the ability to hijack the normal cycle of bone production and resorption would have a survival advantage. Once the invading tumor cell has reached its final destination in the bone, it must create the proper microenvironment in which to survive and develop into a viable tumor. The metastases, just as in the primary tumor, require sufficient blood flow to provide oxygen and nutrients and remove waste products to enable the extensive growth of tumors. OPN and parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) are the two proteins secreted by cancer cells that are primarily implicated in the disruption of the normal cycle of bone formation and resorption. OPN may play a vital role in the process of establishing growth at a secondary site. As an initial step of colonizing the bone, when breast cancer cells arrive in bone, they first interact with the bone marrow endothelial cells before invading into the bone marrow compartment [150]. Thus, in order to understand the repercussions of OPN ablation on early steps bone colonization, we assessed the surrogate indicator of heterotypic attachment to human bone marrow endothelial cells (hBME). It was very interesting to see that the MDA-MB-435 tumor cells stably silenced for OPN (OPNi clones) display a strikingly reduced ability to attach to hBME cells (Fig. 5). Recent reports indicate that OPN-expressing cells produce high levels of hyaluronan synthase 2, an enzyme that synthesizes hyaluronan. It is conceivable that in the absence of OPN and consequently hyaluronan, breast cancer cells are unable to attach to the hBME cells. Thus, OPN appears to function in the early steps of colonizing bone.
Fig. (5).
MDA-MB-435 cells that have been stably silenced for osteopontin by RNA interference show decreased heterotypic adhesion to hBME cells.
OPN may also help generate a favorable growth environment by activating growth factors. As previously mentioned, bone is rich in sequestered growth factors that can be used to promote rapid proliferation of the tumor. The uPA produced in response to OPN is capable of activating some growth factors, including HGF, TGF-β, and bFGF [151–154]. In concert with growth factor receptor pathways, such as EGFR and c-met OPN can accentuate effects of EGF and HGF/scatter factor respectively. Seminal studies by Kang et al., showed that OPN forms a component of a “bone-metastasis signature” of breast cancer cells i.e., breast cancer cells that metastasized to bone had increased OPN expression. Furthermore, OPN functionally enhanced incidence of bone metastases by breast cancer cells in concert with interleukin-11 [155]. Expression of OPN in OPN-negative breast cancer cells increases their predilection to form bone metastasis and OPN knock-out mice display significantly lower incidence of bone metastases [42, 156]. Accordingly, high OPN levels are determinative of higher incidence of bone metastases in mouse models and are correlated with metastatic bone disease and bone resorption in advanced breast cancer patients. Thus, OPN plays a vital role in aiding in the colonization of bone as well as in the establishment of growth at the secondary site.
OPN PRODUCED BY CANCER CELLS IS DIFFERENT FROM HOST-DERIVED OPN
While the detection of OPN in the tumor cells or in circulation has been regardless of the source i.e., whether it is produced by the tumor cells or the host cells, there are distinct differences in the OPN produced by the cancer cells and the OPN produced by the host-cells [41,145, 157–161].
While the host-derived OPN is associated with the extracellular matrix, OPN produced by tumor cells is soluble and does not associate with fibronectin or vitronectin [161].
The tumor-derived soluble form supports invasiveness and the host-derived aggregated form promotes adhesion.
While host-derived OPN acts as a macrophage chemoattractant, tumor-derived OPN is able to inhibit macrophage function and enhances the growth or survival of tumor cells in circulation and thus promotes metastasis [159].
OPN expressed by host cells bears a different post-translational modification than that of the cancer cells. The tumor cell-derived OPN is less phosphorylated compared to the OPN expressed by non-transformed cells. In fact, transformation of normal rat kidney cells changes the phosphorylation profile of OPN from a phosphorylated form to a non-phosphorylated form [162]. Similarly, OPN produced by ras-transformed fibroblasts is significantly less phosphorylated than OPN produced by osteoblasts [163]. Kazanecki and colleagues have proposed that the tumor-derived, less phosphorylated form of OPN may be more effective at promoting cancer progression, either by increasing anchorage-independence and metastasis, or by protecting the cells from immune response and apoptosis, whereas a more highly modified macrophage-produced OPN would serve as an effective chemoattractant and activate T-lymphocytes to attack the tumor cells [164]. It is likely that phosphorylation may influence OPN’s ability to interact and signal via its receptors.
Transformed rat fibroblasts secrete a form of OPN (62-kDa) that has reduced sialylation than the one secreted by non-transformed cells (69-kDa). The 62-kDa form is compromised for its ability to interact with cell surface receptors. Thus, it is likely that the OPN secreted by oncogenically transformed cells may exploit the lack of OPN-receptor interactions to mediate the malignant behavior of the cells [165].
Finally, aggressive breast cancer cells secrete a splice variant of OPN, OPN-c, that protects breast cancer cells from anoikis during anchorage-independent growth [166].
ROLE OF HOST-DERIVED OPN IN FACILITATING TUMOR PROGRESSION AND METASTASIS
The contribution of OPN from the host in the development of tumors was elegantly demonstrated by Crawford and colleagues who chemically-induced squamous carcinoma in wild-type and OPN-deficient mice. They found that tumor growth progressed at a much faster rate in the OPN-deficient mice compared to the wild-type mice; this was likely due to the fact that the tumor-associated stromal cells produced OPN in the wild-type animals that attracted tumoricidal macrophages to the growing tumor, thereby slowing tumor growth at the sites where tumors were induced [159]. On the contrary, Nemoto et al. reported that wild-type mice supported the metastatic colonization and growth of melanoma cells better than the OPN-deficient mice upon injection of melanoma cells via the intracardiac route, suggesting that host-derived OPN may promote cell attachment of tumor cells, leading to higher capacity of cells to attach to bone [42]. In agreement with this, Chakraborty and others [167] have shown that OPN-null mice showed slower progression of tumor growth in breast cancer model as compared to wild type mice. OPN has been determined to be upregulated in response to hypoxia in head and neck cancer patients. The level of OPN in the plasma reflects the degree of hypoxia of the tumor [168–173] and can serve as a surrogate marker for tumor hypoxia and treatment outcome in head and neck cancer patients. Hypoxia induces sequence-specific DNA-binding complexes mediated by a ras-activated enhancer (RAE) in the OPN promoter to induce upregulated expression of OPN.
THERAPEUTIC TARGETING OF OPN
Given the plethora of processes that OPN can influence in tumor progression and metastasis, OPN presents as a very relevant therapeutic target. Efforts towards these have been made at multiple levels. OPN has been targeted at the levels of transcription by the use of shRNA [92], siRNA [174], miRNA [175] and anti-sense RNA [176, 177]. Given the fact that RNA stability of OPN may also regulate OPN [178] expression, these strategies present tangible approaches to regulate the availability of OPN protein within the cell.
The naturally occurring oroidin alkaloid, (−)- agelastatin A, inhibits OPN protein expression, reduces beta-catenin protein expression and enhances expression of the cellular OPN inhibitor, Tcf-4.
(−)-Agelastatin A treatment also and reduced anchorage-independent growth, adhesion, and invasion in human breast cancer cell lines [179]. The administration of green tea polyphenols caused a decrease in the levels of OPN in TRAMP mice [180]. This was attributed to reduce levels and activity of NF-κB, a transcription factor that upregulates OPN expression [92].
Another approach is to modulate the activity of OPN. Proteolytic cleavage of OPN by thrombin increases its biologic activity [106, 181] by opening up the parent OPN molecule into its apparent active conformation [106, 182–185]. Treatment of breast cancer cells with the thrombin-inhibitor, Argatroban, resulted in decreased cell growth, colony-forming ability, adhesion, and migration. The tumor latency of implanted breast cancer cells was increased when the animals were treated with Argatroban. This was accompanied by reduced primary tumor growth and significantly decreased lymphatic metastasis of the breast cancer cells in treated animals, implying the possible use of thrombin inhibitors such as Argatroban as potential therapeutic agents [186].
The use of RNA aptamers targeting OPN appears to be a viable approach in blocking the ability of OPN to bind to its cell surface CD44 and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin receptors resulting in decreased signaling via PI3K, JNK1/2, Src and Akt, signal transduction pathways. This is manifested as decreased adhesion, migration, and invasion characteristics in vitro and decreased local progression and distant metastases in vivo [187]. The ability of OPN to enhance the development of osseous metastases was markedly reduced upon treatment of the experimental animals with Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein (Eap). Eap specifically interacted with recombinant full-length OPN and the 40 kD N-terminal MMP cleavage fragment and prevented the OPN/αvβ-integrin interaction [188].
As a contralateral approach to blocking OPN activity or reducing its levels is to block the receptor for OPN. The αvβ3 integrin appears to play a key role in the development of bone metastasis from breast cancer [189]. Osteoclast activation plays an essential role in the development of bone metastasis. The αvβ3 integrin mediates the attachment of osteoclasts to bone matrix, and it is overexpressed in bone-residing breast cancer cells. Targeting of the αvβ3 integrin has been addressed by some laboratories. In the MDA-MB-435 model, of intracardiac injections, the αvβ3 integrin appears to play an important role in early events (e.g., arrest of tumor cells) in bone metastasis. Mice treated with the αvβ3 integrin-selective inhibitor, S247, one week prior to injection of the tumor cells showed a significant, dose-dependent reduction in osseous metastasis [190] suggesting that αvβ3inhibitors may be useful in the treatment and/or prevention of breast cancer metastases in bone. Ramos et al. [191] have reported the ability of a novel αbβ3-binding disintegrin, DisBa-01, to inhibit the binding ability of cells to vitronectin and inhibit proliferation, angiogenesis and metastatic ability of cancer cells. These findings are supported by the fact that overexpression of functionally active αvβ3 integrin in CHO cells drastically increased the incidence, number, and area of bone metastases in nude mice compared with those observed in mock-transfected CHO cells or in CHO cells expressing a functionally inactive αvβ3 integrin [192]. The MDA-MB-231-BO2 cells established from bone metastasis of MDA-MB-231 cells constitutively overexpress the αvβ3 integrin. The MDA-MB-231-BO2 cells also show enhanced ability to bind to and invade mineralized bone suggesting that αvβ3 integrin expression in tumor cells accelerates the development of osteolytic lesions [192].
SUMMARY & FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
The soluble, secreted phosphoprotein, OPN, no doubt influences multiple processes that aid in tumor development and progression and metastasis. Its role in the development of osseous metastasis of breast cancer continues to be elucidated. In its role as a secreted protein, OPN has recently also been reported to influence the growth of indolent tumors [193], leading to the possibility that OPN expression by tumor cells can perturb the systemic environment of the host and support the outgrowth of dormant micrometastases. In doing so, OPN likely influences the hallmark biological programs that dictate tumor progression. Tumor progression in turn, has an escalating effect on the overall levels of circulating OPN. As a secreted protein, OPN has been tapped into as a potential biomarker to indicate tumor metastasis and also as an indicator of response to anti-cancer treatment. New research on the endocrine influences of OPN on dormant or indolent cancer cells prompts the use of OPN as a biologically relevant indicator of precancerous lesions or occult metastases and a reliable predictive indicator of relapse of the disease. This, in turn, will influence the treatment modality and regimens to be adopted. The versatile functions of OPN have made a case for OPN as a therapeutic target and have prompted inquiries into mechanisms to intervene in its expression and activity. Efforts are being made on several fronts to intervene in the action of OPN. This being said, several considerations must be met including making the agents amenable to systemic administration, tolerance to the inhibitory agents and specifically targeting the tumor-derived OPN. This review helps provide an answer to our cover question to conclude that the elevated OPN is both, a cause and an effect of tumor metastasis.
ABBREVIATIONS
- bFGF
Basic fibroblast growth factor
- CCN
CTGF/Cyr61/NOV family
- CTGF
Connective tissue growth factor
- CYR61
Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- EGF
Epidermal growth factor
- EGFR
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- ERM
Ezrin-radixin-moeisin
- FAC
Focal adhesion complex
- FAK
Focal adhesion kinase
- hBME
human bone marrow-derived endothelial cells
- HGF
Hepatocyte growth factor
- ILK
Integrin linked kinase
- MMP
Matrix metalloproteases
- NF-κB
Nuclear factor κB
- OPN
Osteopontin
- PTHrP
Parathyroid hormone-related protein
- RAE
Ras-activated enhancer
- RGD
Arginine-glycine-aspartate
- SIBLING
Small integrin-binding ligand N-linked glycoprotein
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor β
- uPA
Urokinase plasminogen activator
- VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor
REFERENCES
- [1].Fidler IJ (2002) Semin. CancerBiol, 12, 89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Fidler IJ (2000) Cancer J, 6(Suppl 2), S134–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Ellis LM and Fidler IJ (1996) Eur. J. Cancer, 32, 2451–2460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Fidler IJ (1992) Semin. Urol, 10, 3–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Fidler IJ (1991) Br. Med. Bull, 47, 157–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Onn A and Fidler IJ (2002) In Vivo, 16, 423–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Bellahcene A, Castronovo V, Ogbureke KU, Fisher LW and Fedarko NS (2008) Nat. Rev. Cancer, 8, 212–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Sodek J, Ganss B and McKee MD (2000) Osteopontin Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med, 11, 279–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Giachelli CM and Steitz S (2000) Matrix Biol., 19, 615–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Le Trong I, McDevitt TC, Nelson KE, Stayton PS and Stenkamp RE (2003) Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr, 59, 828–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].McFarland RJ, Garza S, Butler WT and Hook M (1995) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci, 760, 327–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Rollo EE, Laskin DL and Denhardt DT (1996) J. Leukoc. Biol, 60, 397–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Rollo EE and Denhardt DT (1996) Immunology, 88, 642–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Wang KX and Denhardt DT (2008) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 19, 333–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Liu YK, Uemura T, Nemoto A, Yabe T, Fujii N, Ushida T and Tateishi T (1997) FEBS Lett., 420, 112–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Li JJ, Han M, Wen JK and Li AY (2007) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 356, 13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Han M, Wen JK, Zheng B, Liu Z and Chen Y (2007) Cardiovasc. Pathol, 16, 283–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Zheng DQ, Woodard AS, Tallini G and Languino LR (2000) J. Biol. Chem, 275, 24565–24574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Fong YC, Liu SC, Huang CY, Li TM, Hsu SF, Kao ST, Tsai FJ, Chen WC, Chen CY and Tang CH (2009) Lung Cancer, 64, 263–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Zohar R, Suzuki N, Suzuki K, Arora P, Glogauer M, McCulloch CA and Sodek J (2000) J. Cell Physiol, 184, 118–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Suzuki K, Zhu B, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Goldberg HA, McCulloch CA and Sodek J (2002) J. Bone Miner. Res, 17, 1486–1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Sodek J, Zhu B, Huynh MH, Brown TJ and Ringuette M (2002) Connect. Tissue Res, 43, 308–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Qu H, Brown LF, Dvorak HF and Dvorak AM (1997) J. Histochem. Cytochem, 45, 21–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Khan SR, Johnson JM, Peck AB, Cornelius JG and Glenton PA (2002) J. Urol, 168, 1173–1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Yagisawa T, Chandhoke PS, Fan J and Lucia S (1998) J. Endourol, 12, 171–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Castellone MD, Celetti A, Guarino V, Cirafici AM, Basolo F, Giannini R, Medico E, Kruhoffer M, Orntoft TF, Curcio F, Fusco A, Melillo RM and Santoro M (2004) Oncogene, 23, 2188–2196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Rodrigues LR, Teixeira JA, Schmitt FL, Paulsson M and Lindmark-Mansson H (2007) Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev, 16, 1087–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Tuck AB, Hota C and Chambers AF (2001) Breast Cancer Res. Treat, 70, 197–204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Fisher JL, Field CL, Zhou H, Harris TL, Henderson MA and Choong PF (2000) Breast Cancer Res. Treat, 61, 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Ibrahim T, Leong I, Sanchez-Sweatman O, Khokha R, Sodek J, Tenenbaum HC, Ganss B and Cheifetz S (2000) Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 18, 253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Joyce MM, Gonzalez JF, Lewis S, Woldesenbet S, Burghardt RC, Newton GR and Johnson GA (2005) Placenta, 26, 160–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Garlow JE, Ka H, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Jaeger LA and Bazer FW (2002) Biol. Reprod, 66, 718–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Jaeger LA, Ka H, Garlow JE, Pfarrer C, Spencer TE and Burghardt RC (2001) Biol. Reprod, 65, 820–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Luedtke CC, McKee MD, Cyr DG, Gregory M, Kaartinen MT, Mui J and Hermo L (2002) Biol. Reprod, 66, 1437–1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Siiteri JE, Ensrud KM, Moore A and Hamilton DW (1995) Mol. Reprod. Dev, 40, 16–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Iwata M, Awaya N, Graf L, Kahl C and Torok-Storb B (2004) Blood, 103, 4496–4502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Xu G, Nie H, Li N, Zheng W, Zhang D, Feng G, Ni L, Xu R, Hong J and Zhang JZ (2005) J. Clin. Invest, 115, 1060–1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].White FJ, Burghardt RC, Hu J, Joyce MM, Spencer TE and Johnson GA (2006) Reproduction, 132, 919–929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Ding L, Zheng S and Cao J (2002) Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 82, 970–973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Thalmann GN, Sikes RA, Devoll RE, Kiefer JA, Markwalder R, Klima I, Farach-Carson CM, Studer UE and Chung LW (1999) Clin. Cancer Res, 5, 2271–2277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Tucker MA, Chang PL, Prince CW, Gillespie GY and Mapstone TB (1998) Anticancer Res., 18, 807–812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Nemoto H, Rittling SR, Yoshitake H, Furuya K, Amagasa T, Tsuji K, Nifuji A, Denhardt DT and Noda M (2001) J. Bone Miner. Res, 16, 652–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Gaumann A, Petrow P, Mentzel T, Mayer E, Dahm M, Otto M, Kirkpatrick CJ and Kriegsmann J (2001) Virchows. Arch, 439, 668–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Fisher JL, Schmitt JF, Howard ML, Mackie PS, Choong PF and Risbridger GP (2002) Cell Tissue Res., 307, 337–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Tang ZY, Ye SL, Liu YK, Qin LX, Sun HC, Ye QH, Wang L, Zhou J, Qiu SJ, Li Y, Ji XN, Liu H, Xia JL, Wu ZQ, Fan J, Ma ZC, Zhou XD, Lin ZY and Liu KD (2004) J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol, 130, 187–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Grigoriu BD, Scherpereel A, Devos P, Chahine B, Letourneux M, Lebailly P, Gregoire M, Porte H, Copin MC and Lassalle P (2007) Clin. Cancer Res, 13, 2928–2935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Suzuki M, Mose E, Galloy C and Tarin D (2007) Am. J. Pathol, 171, 682–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Rangaswami H and Kundu GC (2007) Oncol. Rep, 18, 909–915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Higashiyama M, Ito T, Tanaka E and Shimada Y (2007) Ann. Surg. Oncol, 14, 3419–3427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Wai PY and Kuo PC (2008) Cancer Metastasis Rev., 27, 103–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].El-Tanani MK (2008) Front. Biosci, 13, 4276–4284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Zhao J, Dong L, Lu B, Wu G, Xu D, Chen J, Li K, Tong X, Dai J, Yao S, Wu M and Guo Y (2008) Gastroenterology, 135, 956–968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Hui EP, Sung FL, Yu BK, Wong CS, Ma BB, Lin X, Chan A, Wong WL and Chan AT (2008) Clin. Cancer Res, 14, 7080–7087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Ang C, Chambers AF, Tuck AB, Winquist E and Izawa JI (2005) BJU Int., 96, 803–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Bramwell VH, Doig GS, Tuck AB, Wilson SM, Tonkin KS, Tomiak A, Perera F, Vandenberg TA and Chambers AF (2006) Clin. Cancer Res, 12, 3337–3343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Rangaswami H, Bulbule A and Kundu GC (2006) Trends Celi Biol., 16, 79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Das R, Philip S, Mahabeleshwar GH, Bulbule A and Kundu GC (2005) IUBMB Life, 57, 441–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Wai PY and Kuo PC (2004) J. Surg. Res, 121, 228–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Rittling SR and Chambers AF (2004) Br. J. Cancer, 90, 1877–1881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].O’Regan A (2003) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 14, 479–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Yeatman TJ and Chambers AF (2003) Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 20, 85–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Denhardt DT, Mistretta D, Chambers AF, Krishna S, Porter JF, Raghuram S and Rittling SR (2003) Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 20, 77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Tuck AB and Chambers AF (2001) J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 6, 419–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Cooper CR, Chay CH and Pienta KJ (2002) Neoplasia, 4, 191–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Furger KA, Menon RK, Tuck AB, Bramwell VH and Chambers AF (2001) Curr. Mol. Med, 1, 621–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Denhardt DT and Guo X (1993) FASEB J., 7, 1475–1482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Chambers AF and Tuck AB (1993) Crit. Rev. Oncog, 4, 95–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Tuck AB, Chambers AF and Allan AL (2007) J. Cell Biochem, 102, 859–868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Tuck AB, O’Malley FP, Singhal H, Harris JF, Tonkin KS, Kerkvliet N, Saad Z, Doig GS and Chambers AF (1998) Int. J. Cancer, 79, 502–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Singhal H, Bautista DS, Tonkin KS, O’Malley FP, Tuck AB, Chambers AF and Harris JF (1997) Clin. Cancer Res, 3, 605–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Bellahcene A and Castronovo V (1995) Am. J. Pathol, 146, 95–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Agrawal D, Chen T, Irby R, Quackenbush J, Chambers AF, Szabo M, Cantor A, Coppola D and Yeatman TJ (2002) J. Natl. Cancer Inst, 94, 513–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Coppola D, Szabo M, Boulware D, Muraca P, Alsarraj M, Chambers AF and Yeatman TJ (2004) Clin. Cancer Res, 10, 184–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Chambers AF, Wilson SM, Kerkvliet N, O’Malley FP, Harris JF and Casson AG (1996) Lung Cancer, 15, 311–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Hotte SJ, Winquist EW, Stitt L, Wilson SM and Chambers AF (2002) Cancer, 95, 506–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Fedarko NS, Jain A, Karadag A, Van Eman MR and Fisher LW (2001) Clin. Cancer Res, 7, 4060–4066. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Kim JH, Skates SJ, Uede T, Wong KK, Schorge JO, Feltmate CM, Berkowitz RS, Cramer DW and Mok SC (2002) JAMA, 287, 1671–1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Bramwell VH, Tuck AB, Wilson SM, Stitt LW, Cherian AK, Rorke SC, Al-Katib W, Postenka CO and Chambers AF (2005) Cancer Biol. Ther, 4, 13361341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Craig AM, Bowden GT, Chambers AF, Spearman MA, Greenberg AH, Wright JA, McLeod M and Denhardt DT (1990) Int. J. Cancer, 46, 133–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Chambers AF, Behrend EI, Wilson SM and Denhardt DT (1992) Anticancer Res., 12, 43–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Oates AJ, Barraclough R and Rudland PS (1996) Oncogene, 13, 97–104 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Ramankulov A, Lein M, Kristiansen G, Loening SA and Jung K (2007) Prostate, 67, 330–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Standal T, Borset M and Sundan A (2004) Exp. Oncol, 26, 179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Mirza M, Shaughnessy E, Hurley JK, Vanpatten KA, Pestano GA, He B and Weber GF (2008) Int. J. Cancer, 122, 889–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Cook AC, Tuck AB, McCarthy S, Turner JG, Irby RB, Bloom GC, Yeatman TJ and Chambers AF (2005) Mol. Carcinog, 43, 225–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Philip S and Kundu GC (2003) J. Biol. Chem, 278, 14487–14497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Hsieh YH, Juliana MM, Hicks PH, Feng G, Elmets C, Liaw L and Chang PL (2006) Cancer Res, 66, 7119–7127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Ito T, Hashimoto Y, Tanaka E, Kan T, Tsunoda S, Sato F, Higashiyama M, Okumura T and Shimada Y (2006) Clin. Cancer Res, 12, 1308–1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Kolb A, Kleeff J, Guweidhi A, Esposito I, Giese NA, Adwan H, Giese T, Buchler MW, Berger MR and Friess H (2005) Cancer Biol. Ther, 4, 740–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Zhou Y, Dai DL, Martinka M, Su M, Zhang Y, Campos EI, Dorocicz I, Tang L, Huntsman D, Nelson C, Ho V and Li G (2005) J. Invest. Dermatol, 124, 1044–1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Song G, Ming Y, Mao Y, Bao S and Ouyang G (2008) Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood), 233, 1537–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Shevde LA, Samant RS, Paik JC, Metge BJ, Chambers AF, Casey G, Frost AR and Welch DR (2006) Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 23, 123–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Lee JL, Wang MJ, Sudhir PR and Chen JY (2008) Mol. Cell Biol, 28, 5710–5723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Liaw L, Lindner V, Schwartz SM, Chambers AF and Giachelli CM (1995) Circ. Res, 77, 665–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Chakraborty G, Jain S and Kundu GC (2008) Cancer Res, 68, 152–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Shijubo N, Uede T, Kon S, Nagata M and Abe S (2000) Crit. Rev. Oncog, 11, 135–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Tang H, Wang J, Bai F, Zhai H, Gao J, Hong L, Xie H, Zhang F, Lan M, Yao W, Liu J, Wu K and Fan D (2008) Cancer Invest, 26, 60–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Infanger M, Grosse J, Westphal K, Leder A, Ulbrich C, Paul M and Grimm D (2008) Ann. Vasc. Surg, 22, 273–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Seipelt RG, Backer CL, Mavroudis C, Stellmach V, Cornwell M, Seipelt IM, Schoendube FA and Crawford SE (2005) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg, 129, 773–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Khan SA, Lopez-Chua CA, Zhang J, Fisher LW, Sorensen ES and Denhardt DT (2002) J. Cell Biochem, 85, 728–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Dunlap KA, Erikson DW, Burghardt RC, White FJ, Reed KM, Farmer JL, Spencer TE, Magness RR, Bazer FW, Bayless KJ and Johnson GA (2008) Biol. Reprod, 79, 983–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Takano S, Tsuboi K, Tomono Y, Mitsui Y and Nose T (2000) Br. J. Cancer, 82, 1967–1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Shijubo N, Uede T, Kon S, Maeda M, Segawa T, Imada A, Hirasawa M and Abe S (1999) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med, 160, 1269–1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Takahashi F, Akutagawa S, Fukumoto H, Tsukiyama S, Ohe Y, Takahashi K, Fukuchi Y, Saijo N and Nishio K (2002) Int. J. Cancer, 98, 707–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Sulzbacher I, Birner P, Trieb K, Lang S and Chott A (2002) Virchows. Arch, 441, 345–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Senger DR and Perruzzi CA (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1314, 13–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Tuck AB, Arsenault DM, O’Malley FP, Hota C, Ling MC, Wilson SM and Chambers AF (1999) Oncogene, 18, 4237–4246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Xuan JW, Hota C, Shigeyama Y, D’Errico JA, Somerman MJ and Chambers AF (1995) J. Cell Biochem, 57, 680–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Zhu B, Suzuki K, Goldberg HA, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, McCulloch CA and Sodek J (2004) J. Cell Physiol, 198, 155–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Hu DD, Hoyer JR and Smith JW (1995) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci, 760, 312–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Hu DD, Lin EC, Kovach NL, Hoyer JR and Smith JW (1995) J. Biol. Chem, 270, 26232–26238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Bayless KJ, Meininger GA, Scholtz JM and Davis GE (1998) J. Celi Sci, 111 (Pt 9), 1165–1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Smith LL, Cheung HK, Ling LE, Chen J, Sheppard D, Pytela R and Giachelli CM (1996) J. Biol. Chem, 271, 28485–28491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Denda S, Reichardt LF and Muller U (1998) Mol. Biol. Celi, 9, 1425–1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Liaw L, Skinner MP, Raines EW, Ross R, Cheresh DA, Schwartz SM and Giachelli CM (1995) J. Clin. Invest, 95, 713–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Seftor RE, Seftor EA and Hendrix MJ (1999) Cancer Metastasis Rev, 18, 359–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Varner JA, Nakada MT, Jordan RE and Coller BS (1999) Angiogenesis, 3, 53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Liapis H, Flath A and Kitazawa S (1996) Diagn. Mol. Pathol, 5, 127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Rae JM, Creighton CJ, Meck JM, Haddad BR and Johnson MD (2007) Breast Cancer Res. Treat, 104, 13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Lacroix M (2009) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol, 63, 567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Ellison G, Klinowska T, Westwood RF, Docter E, French T and Fox JC (2002) Mol. Pathol, 55, 294–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Sellappan S, Grijalva R, Zhou X, Yang W, Eli MB, Mills GB and Yu D (2004) Cancer Res., 64, 3479–3485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Tuck AB, Elliott BE, Hota C, Tremblay E and Chambers AF (2000) J. Cell Biochem, 78, 465–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Katagiri YU, Sleeman J, Fujii H, Herrlich P, Hotta H, Tanaka K, Chikuma S, Yagita H, Okumura K, Murakami M, Saiki I, Chambers AF and Uede T (1999) Cancer Res., 59, 219–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Weber GF, Ashkar S, Glimcher MJ and Cantor H (1996) Science, 271, 509–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Gunthert U, Hofmann M, Rudy W, Reber S, Zoller M, Haussmann I, Matzku S, Wenzel A, Ponta H and Herrlich P (1991) Cell, 65, 13–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Lee JL, Wang MJ, Sudhir PR, Chen GD, Chi CW and Chen JY (2007) Cancer Res, 67, 2089–2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Tuck AB, Hota C, Wilson SM and Chambers AF (2003) Oncogene, 22, 1198–1205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Liaw L, Almeida M, Hart CE, Schwartz SM and Giachelli CM (1994) Circ. Res, 74, 214–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Philip S, Bulbule A and Kundu GC (2001) J. Biol. Chem, 276, 44926–44935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Nagase H, Suzuki K, Morodomi T, Enghild JJ and Salvesen G (1992) Matrix Suppl. 1, 237–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Mueller BM (1996) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol, 213(Pt 1), 65–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Liu Z, Li N, Diaz LA, Shipley M, Senior RM and Werb Z (2005) J. Clin. Invest, 115, 879–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Achbarou A, Kaiser S, Tremblay G, Ste-Marie LG, Brodt P, Goltzman D and Rabbani SA (1994) Cancer Res., 54, 2372–2377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Mi Z, Oliver T, Guo H, Gao C and Kuo PC (2007) Cancer Res., 67, 4088–4097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Zhang G, He B and Weber GF (2003) Mol. Cell Biol, 23, 6507–6519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Noti JD (2000) Int. J. Oncol, 17, 1237–1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Scatena M, Almeida M, Chaisson ML, Fausto N, Nicosia RF and Giachelli CM (1998) J. Cell Biol, 141, 1083–1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Weintraub AS, Schnapp LM, Lin X and Taubman MB (2000) Lab. Invest, 80, 1603–1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Lin YH, Huang CJ, Chao JR, Chen ST, Lee SF, Yen JJ and Yang-Yen HF (2000) Mol. Cell Biol, 20, 2734–2742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Kawamura K, lyonaga K, Ichiyasu H, Nagano J, Suga M and Sasaki Y (2005) Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol, 12, 206–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Ophascharoensuk V, Giachelli CM, Gordon K, Hughes J, Pichler R, Brown P, Liaw L, Schmidt R, Shankland SJ, Alpers CE, Couser WG and Johnson RJ (1999) Kidney Int., 56, 571–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Guo H, Cai CQ, Schroeder RA and Kuo PC (2001) J. Immunol, 166, 1079–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Attur MG, Dave MN, Stuchin S, Kowalski AJ, Steiner G, Abramson SB, Denhardt DT and Amin AR (2001) Arthritis Rheum, 44, 578–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Wai PY, Guo L, Gao C, Mi Z, Guo H and Kuo PC (2006) Surgery, 140, 132–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Fedarko NS, Fohr B, Robey PG, Young MF and Fisher LW (2000) J. Biol. Chem, 275, 16666–16672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Solomayer EF, Diel IJ, Meyberg GC, Gollan C and Bastert G (2000) Breast Cancer Res. Treat, 59, 271–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Perez EA (1999) Cancer Control., 6, 28–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Perez EA (1999) Curr. Oncol. Rep, 1, 11–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Yoneda T (1997) Histol. Histopathol, 12, 1145–1149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Werb Z, Vu TH, Rinkenberger JL and Coussens LM (1999) APMIS, 107, 11–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Mott JD and Werb Z (2004) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol, 16, 558–564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Sternlicht MD and Werb Z (2001) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol, 17, 463–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Chang C and Werb Z (2001) Trends Cell Biol., 11, S37–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Kang Y, Siegel PM, Shu W, Drobnjak M, Kakonen SM, Cordon-Cardo C, Guise TA and Massague J (2003) Cancer Cell, 3, 537–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Chellaiah MA, Kizer N, Biswas R, Alvarez U, Strauss-Schoenberger J, Rifas L, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT and Hruska KA (2003) Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 173–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [157].Senger DR, Perruzzi CA and Papadopoulos A (1989) Anticancer Res., 9, 1291–1299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [158].Bourassa B, Monaghan S and Rittling SR (2004) Cell Immunol., 227, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [159].Crawford HC, Matrisian LM and Liaw L (1998) Cancer Res, 58, 5206–5215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [160].Kon S, Maeda M, Segawa T, Hagiwara Y, Horikoshi Y, Chikuma S, Tanaka K, Rashid MM, Inobe M, Chambers AF and Uede T (2000) J. Cell Biochem, 77, 487–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [161].Rittling SR, Chen Y, Feng F and Wu Y (2002) J. Biol. Chem, 277, 9175–9182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [162].Nemir M, DeVouge MW and Mukherjee BB (1989) J. Biol. Chem, 264, 18202–18208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [163].Christensen B, Kazanecki CC, Petersen TE, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT and Sorensen ES (2007) J. Biol. Chem, 282, 19463–19472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [164].Kazanecki CC, Uzwiak DJ and Denhardt DT (2007) J. Cell Biochem, 102, 912–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [165].Shanmugam V, Chackalaparampil I, Kundu GC, Mukherjee AB and Mukherjee BB (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 5729–5738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [166].He B, Mirza M and Weber GF (2006) Oncogene, 25, 2192–2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [167].Chakraborty G, Jain S, Patil TV and Kundu GC (2008) J. Cell Mol. Med, 12, 2305–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [168].Mack PC, Redman MW, Chansky K, Williamson SK, Farneth NC, Lara PN Jr., Franklin WA, Le QT, Crowley JJ and Gandara DR (2008) J. Clin. Oncol, 26, 4771–4776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [169].Le QT (2007) Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys, 69, S56–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [170].Vordermark D, Said HM, Katzer A, Kuhnt T, Hansgen G, Dunst J, Flentje M and Bache M (2006) BMC Cancer, 6, 207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [171].Zhu Y, Denhardt DT, Cao H, Sutphin PD, Koong AC, Giaccia AJ and Le QT (2005) Oncogene, 24, 6555–6563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [172].Said HM, Katzer A, Flentje M and Vordermark D (2005) Radiother. Oncol, 76, 200–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [173].Le QT, Sutphin PD, Raychaudhuri S, Yu SC, Terris DJ, Lin HS, Lum B, Pinto HA, Koong AC and Giaccia AJ (2003) Clin. Cancer Res, 9, 59–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [174].Gong M, Lu Z, Fang G, Bi J and Xue X (2008) Cancer Lett., 272, 148–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [175].Sun BS, Dong QZ, Ye QH, Sun HJ, Jia HL, Zhu XQ, Liu DY, Chen J, Xue Q, Zhou HJ, Ren N and Qin LX (2008) Hepatology, 48, 1834–1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [176].Behrend EI, Craig AM, Wilson SM, Denhardt DT and Chambers AF (1995) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci, 760, 299–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [177].Su L, Mukherjee AB and Mukherjee BB (1995) Oncogene, 10, 2163–2169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [178].Emani S, Zhang J, Guo L, Guo H and Kuo PC (2008) Surgery, 143, 803–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [179].Mason CK, McFarlane S, Johnston PG, Crowe P, Erwin PJ, Domostoj MM, Campbell FC, Manaviazar S, Hale KJ and El-Tanani M (2008) Mol. Cancer Ther, 7, 548–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [180].Siddiqui IA, Shukla Y, Adhami VM, Sarfaraz S, Asim M, Hafeez BB and Mukhtar H (2008) Pharm. Res, 25, 2135–2142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [181].Senger DR, Perruzzi CA, Papadopoulos-Sergiou A and Van de Water L (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell, 5, 565–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [182].Myles T and Leung LL (2008) J. Biol. Chem, 283, 17789–17796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [183].Scatena M, Liaw L and Giachelli CM (2007) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol, 27, 2302–2309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [184].Myles T, Nishimura T, Yun TH, Nagashima M, Morser J, Patterson AJ, Pearl RG and Leung LL (2003) J. Biol. Chem, 278, 51059–51067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [185].Takahashi K, Takahashi F, Tanabe KK, Takahashi H and Fukuchi Y (1998) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int, 46, 1081–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [186].Schulze EB, Hedley BD, Goodale D, Postenka CO, Al-Katib W, Tuck AB, Chambers AF and Allan AL (2008) Breast Cancer Res. Treat, 112, 243–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [187].Mi Z, Guo H, Russell MB, Liu Y, Sullenger BA and Kuo PC (2009) Mol. Ther, 17, 153–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [188].Schneider D, Liaw L, Daniel C, Athanasopoulos AN, Herrmann M, Preissner KT, Nawroth PP and Chavakis T (2007) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 357, 282–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [189].Takayama S, Ishii S, Ikeda T, Masamura S, Doi M and Kitajima M (2005) Anticancer Res., 25, 79–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [190].Harms JF, Welch DR, Samant RS, Shevde LA, Miele ME, Babu GR, Goldberg SF, Gilman VR, Sosnowski DM, Campo DA, Gay CV, Budgeon LR, Mercer R, Jewell J, Mastro AM, Donahue HJ, Erin N, Debies MT, Meehan WJ, Jones AL, Mbalaviele G, Nickols A, Christensen ND, Melly R, Beck LN, Kent J, Rader RK, Kotyk JJ, Pagel MD, Westlin WF and Griggs DW (2004) Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 21, 119–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [191].Ramos OH, Kauskot A, Cominetti MR, Bechyne I, Salla Pontes CL, Chareyre F, Manent J, Vassy R, Giovannini M, Legrand C, Selistre-de-Araujo HS, Crepin M and Bonnefoy A (2008) Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 25, 53–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [192].Pecheur I, Peyruchaud O, Serre CM, Guglielmi J, Voland C, Bourre F, Margue C, Cohen-Solal M, Buffet A, Kieffer N and Clezardin P (2002) FASEB J., 16, 1266–1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [193].McAllister SS, Gifford AM, Greiner AL, Kelleher SP, Saelzler MP, Ince TA, Reinhardt F, Harris LN, Hylander BL, Repasky EA and Weinberg RA (2008) Cell, 133, 994–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





