Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2019 Nov 11;15(11):e1008089. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008089

Host nutritional status affects alphavirus virulence, transmission, and evolution

James Weger-Lucarelli 1,2,¤,*, Lucia Carrau 1, Laura I Levi 1,3, Veronica Rezelj 1, Thomas Vallet 1, Hervé Blanc 1, Jérémy Boussier 4, Daniela Megrian 5, Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott 2, Tanya LeRoith 2, Marco Vignuzzi 1
Editor: Richard J Kuhn6
PMCID: PMC6872174  PMID: 31710653

Abstract

Malnourishment, specifically overweight/obesity and undernourishment, affects more than 2.5 billion people worldwide, with the number affected ever-increasing. Concurrently, emerging viral diseases, particularly those that are mosquito-borne, have spread dramatically in the past several decades, culminating in outbreaks of several viruses worldwide. Both forms of malnourishment are known to lead to an aberrant immune response, which can worsen disease outcomes and reduce vaccination efficacy for viral pathogens such as influenza and measles. Given the increasing rates of malnutrition and spread of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses), there is an urgent need to understand the role of host nutrition on the infection, virulence, and transmission of these viruses. To address this gap in knowledge, we infected lean, obese, and undernourished mice with arthritogenic arboviruses from the genus Alphavirus and assessed morbidity, virus replication, transmission, and evolution. Obesity and undernourishment did not consistently influence virus replication in the blood of infected animals except for reductions in virus in obese mice late in infection. However, morbidity was increased in obese mice under all conditions. Using Mayaro virus (MAYV) as a model arthritogenic alphavirus, we determined that both obese and undernourished mice transmit virus less efficiently to mosquitoes than control (lean) mice. In addition, viral genetic diversity and replicative fitness were reduced in virus isolated from obese compared to lean controls. Taken together, nutrition appears to alter the course of alphavirus infection and should be considered as a critical environmental factor during outbreaks.

Author summary

Over- and undernutrition, collectively known as malnutrition, affect over 2.5 billion people worldwide. Associations between malnutrition and mosquito-borne virus infection and resulting disease have been identified in epidemiological studies but have not been explored in controlled studies. Here, we infect obese or undernourished mice with different arthritis inducing viruses in the genus Alphavirus and measure disease symptoms, viral replication, transmission, and evolution. We found that markers of disease, namely weight loss and footpad swelling, were increased in obese mice. We also found that replication differences between mice fed different diets were minimal except late in infection for obese mice when levels of virus dropped significantly. When mosquitoes were allowed to feed on mice fed different diets, we observed reduced infection and transmission rates, depending on the diet. Finally, we found reduced genetic diversity and replicative fitness of virus isolated from obese mice. This study provides insights into the influence of nutrition on alphavirus pathogenesis and evolution.

Introduction

Arthritogenic alphaviruses are globally distributed and have been responsible for several recent large outbreaks. Notably, chikungunya virus (CHIKV) re-emerged in 2004 to cause a massive outbreak in the Indian Ocean region [1], which subsequently spread to the Americas in 2013, resulting in millions of cases [2]. Ross River virus (RRV) causes thousands of cases a year in Australia [3] and has previously caused outbreaks in the Pacific Islands [4]. Mayaro virus (MAYV), traditionally confined to sylvatic transmission in South America, was recently isolated in Haiti for the first time, serving as a warning that urban transmission can occur [5]. Arthritogenic alphaviruses produce a disease that is characterized by fever, myalgia, and polyarthralgia, which can last for months or even years [6,7]. Recent CHIKV epidemics have been associated with an increased number of deaths, suggesting that severe disease may be more common than is typically thought [810]. While the rise in global travel, the spread of mosquito vectors, and climate change are likely involved in the expansion of these viruses, it is conceivable that changes in human health have also facilitated spread. Specifically, worldwide obesity has tripled since 1975, and the World Health Organization (WHO) currently estimates that 1.9 billion adults are overweight or obese [11]. Concurrently, roughly 10% of the adult population worldwide is considered underweight [12]. Over- and underweight, along with nutrient deficiencies, can be classified together as malnutrition and commonly occur in the same country or even within the same family [13].

Both obesity and undernutrition are known to alter immunity and can lead to an increased risk of infection from several pathogens (reviewed in [14]). Additionally, obesity and undernutrition have been shown to increase disease severity and decrease the protective immune response for influenza virus [1518]. For arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses), some epidemiological reports suggest that obesity is associated with a higher likelihood of being seropositive for CHIKV [19,20], Sindbis virus (SINV) [21], and dengue virus (DENV) [22]. In contrast, several reports suggest that undernourishment may result in a decreased risk of contracting dengue fever [22]. In addition to susceptibility to infection, obesity has been identified as a risk factor for greater disease severity following infection with CHIKV [23] and DENV [22]. Undernourishment, in contrast, has been associated with protection from severe DENV disease [24,25]. However, these data are not conclusive as other studies have found either no association with DENV disease severity [26,27] or an increased risk of severe disease [22]. Depending on how malnutrition was defined, infants in the same study were found to have both an increased or decreased risk for severe DENV disease [28]. While the epidemiological data are quite clear that obesity is associated with more severe disease outcomes for various arboviruses, this connection is not so clear for undernutrition.

To our knowledge, no studies have directly assessed the role of nutrition in arbovirus infection using animal models. Given the worldwide prevalence of these forms of malnutrition and arbovirus disease, it is essential to understand how these comorbidities interact. We sought to determine what role both over- and undernutrition play in alphavirus disease, replication, transmission, and virus evolution in a mouse model. To accomplish this, we fed mice different diets; a high-fat overnutrition diet (HFD) with 45% fat; a low-protein undernutrition diet (5% protein); and a control diet with similar characteristics to the other diets except for macronutrient content. Following a sustained feeding period, we infected mice with either CHIKV, MAYV, or RRV and followed infection. We observed altered virus replication and transmission to mosquitoes in obese mice. Furthermore, we noted a reduction in genetic diversity in virus isolated from obese mice. Our findings illustrate the importance of nutrition on virus infection and suggest that nutritional status may be an underappreciated host factor in arbovirus disease, transmission, and evolution.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All animal work was performed in accordance with the Animal Committee regulations of the Institut Pasteur in Paris, France, in accordance with the 2010/63 EU directive adopted on 22 September 2010 by the European Parliament and the European Union Council. Mouse protocol 2013–0012 was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation at the Institut Pasteur.

Cells and viruses

BHK-21 and Vero were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and grown in DMEM with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Aag2 and U4.4 mosquito cell lines were initially obtained from G.P. Piljman, Wageningen University, the Netherlands and maintained at 28°C with 5% CO2 in Schneider’s medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% nonessential amino acids, and 1% P/S. An Asian genotype of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) was rescued from an infectious clone of a virus initially isolated in the Caribbean [29]. MAYV strain TRVL 4675 and RRV strain T48 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA) and infectious clones were constructed under an SP6 promoter in the same plasmid backbone of the CHIKV clone described above. The MAYV infectious clone used in this study has been described previously [30]. The RRV infectious clone will be described further in a separate manuscript. A modified version of the MAYV plasmid that contained the nanoLuc (nLuc) reporter gene in the nsp3 protein was constructed as previously described [31]. Recovery of infectious virus from plasmid stocks was performed as previously described [32] except that Xfect RNA transfection reagent (Takara) was used to introduce RNA into cells. Virus titers were calculated by plaque assay as previously described [33].

Mice

C57BL/6N (Black and albino) and Balb/c mice were obtained from Charles River at 4–6 weeks of age. For studies with CHIKV, male C57BL/6N were used. For all other studies, female mice were used. All biosafety level 3 (BSL3) work was performed in isolator units in accordance with Institut Pasteur regulations.

Mouse Infections

Mice were infected intradermally via the hind left-footpad as previously described [34]. For experiments involving CHIKV and MAYV, 104 PFU of virus in 50 μl was used for infections. For experiments involving RRV, 103 PFU of virus in 50 μl was used for infections. All virus dilutions were performed in RPMI-1640 media with 10 mM HEPES and 1% FBS. Mice were weighed daily following infection and monitored for morbidity. Inflammation at the site of injection was assessed by measuring the width of the infected footpad using a digital caliper. Blood collections were performed using the submandibular route with a 5 mM lancet (Goldenrod) into a gold-top microtainer tube (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ USA). Serum was separated via centrifugation at 5,000 x g for 10 minutes and transferred to a fresh tube before storage at -80°C. For infections and blood collections, mice were anesthetized using either isoflurane inhalation or a ketamine/xylazine (10 and 1 mg/ml, respectively) mix introduced by intraperitoneal (IP) injection. Infection of RRV in Balb/c mice varied slightly. Mice were treated with 0.1 mg in 100 μL of IFNAR1 blocking antibody (MAR1-5A3, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, [35]) via the intraperitoneal route one day before infection to increase their susceptibility to infection. Viremia was measured in all studies by plaque assay unless otherwise noted.

Histopathology and organ titration

Tissues were harvested from mice and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. The Virginia Tech Animal Laboratory Services (ViTALS) performed paraffin embedding, sectioning, and staining with hematoxylin and eosin, and two independent anatomic pathologists read the slides. For viral titers from organs, tissues were harvested aseptically into RPMI media with 10 mM HEPES and 1% FBS containing a sterile steel 5mm pellet to a final concentration of 10% weight by volume. The tissues were homogenized using a TissueLyser II (QIAGEN) for 2 minutes at 30 cycles per second. Plaque assays were performed on the cleared homogenate.

Diets and feeding experiments

All diets used in this study were obtained from SAFE diets (Augy, France). These custom diets were designed to vary as little as possible from one another except for macronutrient ratios. The obesogenic diet was a slightly modified version of a standard high-fat diet that has been used previously [36]. Four-week-old mice were fed the diets for 8 and 10 weeks. S1 Table displays the macronutrient and mineral composition of each diet. Food and water were provided to mice ad libitum. Mice were weighed weekly or biweekly prior infection to monitor the effect of diet on weight. All groups of mice were maintained on the specified diet for the entire duration of the experiment, including after infection. Before infection, mice were fed for 8–10 weeks on the different diets; a 45% fat obesogenic diet, a 5% protein undernourishment diet, and a control diet. Throughout the rest of the manuscript, we will refer to mice fed these diets as obese, LP, and lean, respectively.

ELISA

We quantified leptin levels in the serum of mice using the mouse/rat leptin Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The optical density values obtained were fit to a standard curve, and the data are expressed as ng/mL of leptin.

Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and Genome to PFU calculation

Genomic sense viral RNA was quantified using qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR was performed on unextracted serum samples that were first heat inactivated at 50°C and then diluted 1:5 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). This method was shown to be more sensitive than when RNA extraction was included [37], a result which we confirmed here (S1 Fig). qRT-PCR was performed with the NEB Luna One-Step RT-qPCR for Probes mix (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). Primers and probes used in the study are listed in S2 Table and were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Leuven, Belgium). qRT-PCRs were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions except for several modifications. Trehalose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), betaine (Sigma-Aldrich), and bovine serum albumin (NEB) were added at a final concentration of 0.15 M, 0.5 M, and 1 mg/mL, respectively. Cycling conditions were as follows on a Bio-Rad CFX-96 (Hercules, CA, USA); 55°C for 20 minutes for reverse transcription, 95°C for 5 minutes for initial denaturation and polymerase activation followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds (denaturation), and 60°C for 1 minute (annealing/extension). Readings to measure amplification were taken after the combined annealing/extension step. The number of genomes/mL was calculated based on a series of dilutions of RNA that was generated by in vitro transcription from the full-length infectious clones mentioned previously to generate a standard curve. The Ct values of the samples were then fit to the standard curve to calculate the genomes/mL (GE/mL). The genome to PFU ratios (GE:PFU) was calculated by dividing the GE/mL by the PFU/mL.

In vivo imaging

Albino C57BL/6 mice were used for in vivo imaging studies. Mice that were previously fed the different diets for 8-weeks were infected with 104 PFU MAYV expressing nLuc in the hind left footpad. Following infection, mice were monitored for viremia and luminescence. Mice anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine were intraperitoneally injected with furimazine (20 μg/mouse, a gift of Yves Janin, Institut Pasteur) and imaged within 5 minutes of furimazine administration for 15 seconds. Photon flux (photons/second) was quantified using Living Image software (Perkin-Elmer). All images contained at least one uninfected control animal. For data analysis, we selected the hind left footpad as the region of interest (ROI). We then normalized the flux values within the ROI of each infected mouse to the flux of the ROI of the uninfected mouse present in the same image. These normalized data were then log-transformed to produce a normal distribution before performing statistical comparisons.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation

RNA was extracted from serum and cell culture supernatant samples using the ZR-96 Viral DNA/RNA Kit from Zymo Research (Irvine, CA, USA). Samples were then DNase treated with TURBO DNase (ThermoFisher) and purified using RNAClean XP beads (Agencourt). Library preparation for NGS was performed using the Trio RNA-Seq kit (NuGEN), which creates, amplifies, and fragments cDNA and then depletes ribosomal RNA. We then sequenced the libraries on an Illumina NextSeq500 using single-end 150bp reads.

NGS data analysis

Generated sequencing files were first trimmed for low-quality bases and adapter sequences using BBDuk (BBMap—Bushnell B.—sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/). To generate a consensus sequence for comparisons, we aligned the fastq files from the MAYV stocks that were used for infection to a MAYV TRVL 4675 reference sequence (Accession MK070492.1) using BBMap. We next called variants using LoFreq and filtered the resulting vcf file to contain only variants above 50% [38]. Finally, we used vcftools to generate a new consensus fasta file based on the variants above 50% [39]. The trimmed reads were then used as an input for analysis using the ViVAN pipeline [40] with a coverage cutoff of >100x and a p-value filter of 0.05. The ViVAN outputs provide an array of genetic diversity indices, including Shannon entropy, region variation, and region heterogeneity. Analysis with Vivan was performed as previously described [29,4042]. Briefly, for each position throughout the viral genome, base identity and their quality scores were collected. Each variant was determined to be valid using a generalized likelihood-ratio test (used to determine the total number of minority variants) and its allele rate was modified according to its covering read qualities based on a maximum likelihood estimation. Additionally, a confidence interval was calculated for each allele rate. In order to correct for multiple testing, the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate was set at 5%. Shannon entropy provides a measure of genetic diversity associated with the uncertainty of sampling a given genomic position; higher Shannon entropy indicates higher genetic diversity. The region variation is affected by selective pressures on the virus; a high variation rate suggests the accumulation of variant alleles which may be caused by positive selective pressures. Region heterogeneity, in contrast, measures replication fidelity; a virus with a more error-prone polymerase will have higher region heterogeneity. The equations for Shannon Entropy, region variation, and region heterogeneity are presented in our previous publications [40,41].

Quantitative in vivo competition assay for empirical virus fitness measures

Relative fitness was measured using a qRT-PCR based direct competition assay previously described in [43] with some modifications. Serum was taken two days post-MAYV infection from mice fed either the control, 45% fat, or 5% protein diet to compete against a genetically marked reference virus with seven synonymous changes in the hypervariable portion of the nsp3 protein, which has previously been shown to tolerate modifications [44]. 30,000 PFU from each serum sample was mixed with 30,000 PFU (1:1 ratio) of the marked virus and then used to infect female 6-week old lean C57BL/6 mice in the hind left footpad. Serum was taken one and two days post-infection and left footpads were harvested following euthanasia on the second day post-infection.

In vivo transmission experiments

Aedes aegypti female mosquitoes belonging to the 7th generation of a colony coming from wild mosquitoes collected in Kamphaeng Phet Province (Thailand) were used for these studies. The mosquitoes were reared at 28°C, 70% relative humidity, under a 12 h light: 12 h dark cycle, and fed with 10% sucrose ad libitum. Groups of female mosquitoes were separated into cartons and eight days post-eclosion were allowed to feed on ketamine/xylazine anesthetized mice, which had been infected with MAYV 2 days previously, for 30–45 minutes. Fully engorged females were separated into new cartons and placed at 28°C, 70% humidity, under a 12 h light: 12 h dark cycle with freely available sucrose. After ten days, the mosquitoes were anesthetized using Triethylamine (Sigma-Aldrich) and bodies and saliva were collected to assess infection and transmission, respectively. Bodies were homogenized using the TissueLyser II (QIAGEN) for 2 minutes at 30 cycles per second in RPMI containing 20% FBS, antibiotic/antimycotic mix, and 10 mM HEPES (herein called mosquito diluent). Saliva was collected by placing the proboscis in a barrier pipette containing 10μL mosquito diluent for 30 minutes. Following completion, the contents of the tip were pipetted into a tube containing 50μL mosquito diluent. The presence of virus was assessed by plaque assay and qRT-PCR.

Statistics

All statistics were performed in GraphPad version 8. Weight and footpad swelling comparisons were performed using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Virus or RNA levels were compared using either a one-way or two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. When analyses included a component of time, a repeated measures analysis was included since we followed the same individuals over time. Transmission/infection rates for individual mice and antibody titers were determined to follow a non-normal distribution; thus, we used the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons. Total transmission and infection rates were compared using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Survival was compared using a Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. For comparisons between extracted and unextracted samples for qRT-PCR, data were compared using a two-tailed paired t-test. All experiments were repeated 2–3 times unless otherwise noted. The data are presented as the result of one representative experiment.

Results

The effect of diet on weight change and leptin levels in mice

Mice gained considerably more weight on the high-fat diets compared to the 5% protein or control diets (Fig 1A presents the change of weight as a percentage while Supp. Fig 2A–2C presents the weights in grams, p<0.0001 at each time point after week 2). Undernourished mice experienced only slightly lower average weights than lean controls (p<0.05 after eight weeks, except for Balb/c mice. S2C Fig). To further assess nutritional status, we measured serum levels of the adipokine leptin. Leptin, a pro-inflammatory adipokine primarily secreted by adipocytes, is a blood marker that generally increases during obesity and decreases in severe undernourishment [45]. Obese mice had significantly increased levels of leptin in their serum following 8–10 weeks of feeding compared to lean controls (Fig 1B, p<0.0001). Leptin levels in LP mice were not significantly different from controls (p = 0.2935).

Fig 1. Weights of mice following feeding on different diets.

Fig 1

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or a control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. A. Weights were measured weekly or bi-weekly following the initiation of feeding. Weights are plotted as the percent change compared to initial weight at the onset of feeding. B. Leptin was measured following 8–10 weeks of feeding using an ELISA. Statistical comparisons were made using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—**** p<0.0001. For A, the error bars represent standard error. For B, the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Each graph represents data obtained from at least two independent experiments. The results from one representative experiment are presented.

Fig 2. Mice with differing nutritional status have altered morbidity following alphavirus infection.

Fig 2

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (A-D) or Balb/c (E-F) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with 104 PFU of either Mayaro virus (MAYV, 7 mice per group) or chikungunya virus (CHIKV, 14 mice per group) or 103 PFU of Ross River virus (RRV, 5 mice per group) in the hind left footpad and monitored for weight change (A, C, and E), footpad swelling (B, D), and, for RRV, mortality (F). For A-E, statistical analyses were performed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. For F, statistical analysis was performed by the Mantel-Cox test. The error bars represent standard error. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Besides E-F, each graph represents data obtained from at least two independent experiments. The results from one representative experiment are presented.

Obese mice experience more severe morbidity following alphavirus infection

Our goal was to determine the effect of nutrition on disease burden upon infection with an arthritogenic alphavirus. To this end, we infected mice with MAYV following the 8–10 week feeding period and monitored the mice for signs of morbidity, specifically weight change or footpad swelling, over time. Obese mice experienced significantly greater weight loss following MAYV challenge compared to lean mice (Fig 2A, p<0.05 for days 1, 6, and 10 post-infection, compared to lean controls. S3A Fig presents the data in grams). Obese mice also displayed significantly higher footpad swelling following MAYV infection compared to lean controls (Fig 2B, p = 0.0003 on day 2 post-infection compared to lean controls). Lean controls and LP mice displayed similar results following MAYV infection.

We next sought to determine if the differences in morbidity observed following MAYV infection were true for another arthritogenic alphavirus, namely CHIKV. Obese mice lost significantly more weight following CHIKV challenge compared to lean mice (Fig 2C, two-way ANOVA, all p<0.05 between days 5–7 compared to lean controls. S3B Fig presents the data in grams). No differences were observed between the LP and lean groups infected with CHIKV. Both obese and LP mice experienced increased footpad swelling compared to lean controls (Fig 2D, obese vs. lean p<0.05 on days 7–9 and LP vs. lean p<0.05 on days 7, 9, 10, and 11). However, despite the differences in footpad swelling, we did not observe differences in histopathology between any of the groups following CHIKV infection (S4 Fig). Furthermore, we did not observe differences in histopathology in the liver, spleen, heart, or brain. We observed infiltration of histiocytes in all the infected footpads, and overall scores of pathology were similar among the groups (S5 Fig).

To determine whether these results were specific to C57BL/6 mice, and could be further expanded to another arthritogenic alphavirus, we next infected adult Balb/c mice with RRV. Since previous reports found that these mice are refractory to RRV infection [46], we treated the mice with an anti-IFNAR antibody (MAR1-5A3) to block type-1 interferon signaling one day before infection, as this is known to increase susceptibility to viral infection [35]. Both obese and LP mice experienced significantly increased weight loss after RRV challenge compared to lean control mice (Fig 2E, p<0.05 for both groups as compared to control on days 1–5 post-infection. S3C Fig presents the data in grams.). After infection, 2 and 3 mice from the obese and LP groups succumbed to infection, respectively, while none succumbed in the lean group (Fig 2F). Statistical comparisons for survival approached but did not reach, statistical significance (p = 0.138 and 0.055 for obese and LP, respectively, compared to control).

Nutrition alters alphavirus replication kinetics

To evaluate the effect of diet on virus replication in mice, we infected mice with either MAYV, CHIKV, or RRV and then measured serum levels of virus over time either by qRT-PCR or plaque assay. On Day 1 post-MAYV infection, we observed increased levels of viremia and RNAemia for obese and LP mice compared to lean controls (Fig 3A and 3B; for viremia; obese vs. control—p = 0.0002 and LP vs. control—0.0128; for RNAemia; obese vs. control—p = 0.0008 and LP vs. control—0.0350). Obese mice displayed lower levels of both infectious virus and viral RNA 3 days post-MAYV infection compared to lean controls (viremia; p = 0.0293 and RNAemia; p = 0.0007). No differences were observed in viral RNA levels in the blood of mice infected with CHIKV except for day 3 post-infection where obese mice had significantly lower RNAemia than lean controls (Fig 3C, p<0.0001). There were no differences in replication at any time post-infection following RRV infection (Fig 3D). Given the similarities observed between CHIKV, MAYV, and RRV replication and pathogenesis in mice, we proceeded only with MAYV for all future studies.

Fig 3. Nutrition alters viral replication kinetics.

Fig 3

Groups of C57BL/6N (A-C, 7 mice per group) or Balb/c mice (D, 5 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with either Mayaro virus (MAYV, A-B), chikungunya virus (CHIKV, C), or Ross River virus (RRV, D). At different times post-infection, the virus was quantified either by plaque assay (A, D) or qRT-PCR (B, C). GE = genome equivalents. Statistical analyses were performed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Except for D, each graph represents data obtained from at least two independent experiments. The results from one representative experiment are presented.

In order to determine the effect of diet on viral dissemination and replication in the organs, we collected the spleen and liver from mice infected with MAYV 2 days post-infection and measured viral titers by plaque assay. We did not observe significant differences in viral titers between any group for either liver (S6A Fig) or spleen (S6B Fig).

Obese mice infected with luciferase-expressing MAYV have increased local replication

To visualize local replication at the site of infection, we infected mice fed different diets with a MAYV expressing the nano luciferase protein (nLuc). Obese mice displayed a significant increase in luminescence in their hind-left footpads 6 days after infection compared to lean controls (Fig 4A, p = .0022). We did not observe differences in luminescence between the groups on day 2 or day 13 post-infection. Furthermore, at 15 seconds of exposure time on day 6 post-infection, nLuc expression was observed in the bodies of obese mice but not in the other groups. Representative images of each group on day 6 post-infection are presented for the obese (Fig 4B), LP (Fig 4C), and lean groups (Fig 4D).

Fig 4. Local viral replication is increased in obese mice.

Fig 4

Groups of albino C57BL/6N mice (5 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese, B), 5% protein (LP, C) or control diet (Lean, D) for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) expressing nano-luciferase (nLuc) to track replication. At different time points post-infection, mice were anesthetized, injected intraperitoneally with 20 μg/mouse of the furimazine substrate and imaged using a Perkins Elmer IVIS Spectrum machine. Mice were imaged for 15 seconds within 5 minutes of substrate administration, and photon flux (photons/second) was quantified in the hind left footpad using Living Image software (A). The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. The data are presented as flux or photons/second (p/s) present within the left footpad. The flux is used to quantify the amount of light emitted from the footpad. Representative images of mice fed different diets, infected with MAYV-nLuc, and then imaged six days following infection (B-D). An uninfected control mouse is presented as the leftmost mouse in each image. Statistical analyses were performed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—** p<0.01.

Virus isolated from mice fed a high-fat diet has reduced genetic diversity

To examine the role of diet on the viral genetic diversity, we performed NGS on the viral RNA isolated from mice that were fed different diets and then infected with MAYV. We sequenced viral RNA from serum samples that were isolated 2 days post-infection. Since there were no significant differences in the concentration of genomes in these samples between the groups (Fig 3B), we used the same volume for each sample as input for library preparation. Following Illumina sequencing, we used the ViVan pipeline [40] to generate diversity statistics to assess differences between viral genetic diversity in the virus from each group. Average sequencing coverage across the genome was the same for each group (S7 Fig). Overall and non-synonymous Shannon entropy, markers of genetic diversity, were significantly reduced in virus isolated from obese mice compared to lean mice (Fig 5A and 5B, p = 0.0082 and p = 0.0086, respectively). The difference between LP and lean mice approached statistical significance (p = 0.0587 and 0.0797 for total genome and non-synonymous Shannon entropy, respectively). We next compared region variation, a marker that is affected by selective pressures. Viral RNA from obese mice showed significantly lower region variation for both overall (Fig 5C, p = 0.0107) and non-synonymous (Fig 5D, p = 0.0129) sites compared to lean controls. We observed a trend towards lower region variation for both total and non-synonymous regions when we compared the LP and lean groups (p = 0.1044 and p = .1068, respectively). We also assessed region heterogeneity, which is not impacted by the accumulation of specific variations and is, therefore, a measure of replication fidelity. No significant differences were observed between any group for region heterogeneity (Fig 5E and 5F).

Fig 5. Viral replication in obese mice results in decreased genetic diversity.

Fig 5

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control diet (Lean) for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and blood was collected two days later. RNA was isolated from the serum and next-generation sequencing libraries were prepared and then sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500. The FASTQ files were trimmed for adapter and low-quality sequences using BBDuk. The trimmed reads were then analyzed using the ViVAN pipeline with a coverage cutoff of >100x and a p-value filter of 0.05. From the output of ViVAN, we compared both total and non-synonymous Shannon entropy (A-B), Region variation (C-D), and Region heterogeneity (E-F) as markers of genetic diversity. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05, ** p<0.01.

Virus isolated from obese mice has reduced fitness in mice

We made viral fitness comparisons using both indirect measurements, genome to PFU ratio (GE:PFU), and direct measurements, competitive fitness assays. We observed no differences in GE:PFU among the groups on either day 1 or 2 post-infection (Fig 6A). However, we noted a significant increase in GE:PFU ratio between days 1 and 2 for the obese group, while the other two groups remained consistent (p = 0.0169 for day 1 vs. day 2 for the obese group, p>0.9999 for day 1 vs. day 2 comparison for the other two groups). Because viral fitness is dependent on the replication environment, we next sought to determine fitness differences of viruses isolated from mice fed on different diets when faced with new replication conditions, naïve lean mice. To assess fitness, we mixed a marked reference virus (REF) at a 1:1 ratio (PFU:PFU) with virus from serum isolated 2 days post-infection with MAYV. The marked reference virus contains seven synonymous mutations introduced in the hypervariable region of the nsp3 gene, which facilitates differentiation from the wild-type (WT) sequence. Fitness was measured using a Taqman qRT-PCR based assay that distinguishes between WT and REF sequences (S8 Fig). We then used the 1:1 mix to infect new lean mice in the hind left footpad. Virus derived from obese mice had a significant reduction in fitness at the injection site compared to lean controls (Fig 6B, p = 0.0097). Despite the early difference in fitness, virus derived from obese mice was able to recover fitness, as no differences were observed on day 1 or 2 post-infection in the serum among any group (Fig 6C and 6D).

Fig 6. Virus isolated from obese mice reduced early in vivo fitness.

Fig 6

Relative fitness of Mayaro virus (MAYV) isolated from mice fed different diets was tested by measuring an indirect measurement, genome to PFU ratio (GE:PFU), and an in vivo direct competition assay. Groups of C57BL/6N mice (5 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control diet (Lean) for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and bled at different time points post-infection. GE:PFU ratios were calculated by dividing the number of RNA genomes present in the serum of mice by the number of PFUs in the same sample (A). Statistical comparisons were performed using a two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. For direct in vivo competition assays, serum containing MAYV collected on two days post-infection of individual mice fed different diets were mixed at a 1:1 ratio with a genetically marked reference virus and then this mixture was used to infect new, lean C57BL/6N mice. For each mouse tested, one new mouse was infected (n = 7). Following infection of mice with the mixtures, serum samples were collected for two consecutive days, the mice were euthanized, and footpads were collected. Fitness was measured using a multiplex qRT-PCR developed in-house to discriminate between the wild-type MAYV sequence and the marked reference virus. Fitness is shown for each group in the footpad (B) and serum for one (C) and two-days (D) post-infection. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05, ** p<0.01.

Aedes aegypti mosquitoes have lower vector competence for virus derived from obese mice

Since most arboviruses must efficiently infect mosquitoes to sustain transmission, we next assessed whether mosquitoes that fed on viremic mice fed different diets would have altered vector competence. We infected groups of C57BL/6 mice fed different diets with MAYV and, two days later, groups of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes (n = 16–20) were allowed to feed on individual mice (n = 5), resulting in 96 blood-fed mosquitoes per group. The mosquitoes were held for 10 days before bodies, to assess infection, and saliva, to assess transmission potential, were collected. The amount of infectious virus present was the same in the serum of mice from each group on the day of the transmission (Fig 7A, p = 0.3722 and p = .9863 for the obese and LP groups compared to lean controls, respectively).

Fig 7. Virus from obese mice decreased infectivity to mosquitoes and lower transmission rates.

Fig 7

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV), and two days later were individually used to feed groups of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Serum was also collected to measure viremia two days post-infection by plaque assay (A). Mosquitoes were dissected ten days post-feeding on the viremic mice, at which point bodies (for infection, B and D) and saliva (for transmission potential, C and E-F) were collected for individual mosquitoes. The infection and transmission rates were calculated for the mice individually within a group (B-C) and for all individual mice combined within a group (D-E) based on the presence or absence of infectious virus tested by plaque assay. The number of RNA copies were calculated by qRT-PCR (F). The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses for A-C and F were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. For comparing rates in D and E, a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was used. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05, ** p<0.01.

To assess the infection rate of the mosquitoes fed on individual mice, we first analyzed the data by measuring infection and transmission rates from each mouse. Mosquitoes that fed on obese mice had reduced infection and transmission rates compared to lean controls (Fig 7B and 7C, p = 0.0451 and 0.0443, respectively). The infection and transmission rates observed in LP and control groups were not significantly different. The infection rates for obese mice varied from 6.3–55%, LP from 15–50%, and lean controls from 35–75%. The transmission rates for obese mice varied from 0–5%, LP from 0–20%, and lean controls from 5–15%. 60% and 20% of obese and LP mice had no mosquitoes found to be transmission positive following feeding, whereas all the lean controls resulted in transmission positive mosquitoes.

When we combined all mosquitoes for all mice in each group, we found that infection rates were significantly lower for mosquitoes fed on both obese and LP mice compared to lean control (Fig 7D, p = 0.0001 and 0.0005, respectively). Only 2% of all mosquitoes exposed to obese mice contained infectious virus in their saliva. In contrast, 7.3% of LP mice and 8.3% of lean mice contained infectious virus in their saliva. However, the difference between obese and lean mice did not reach significance for transmission in all mosquitoes (Fig 7E, p = .10). Finally, we compared the number of viral genomes in the saliva of mosquitoes fed on each group (Fig 7F), which is a proxy for the ability of an individual mosquito to transmit to a new host. No significant differences were observed between any of the groups.

Obese mice have reduced chronic RNA levels

Arthritogenic alphaviruses can cause chronic infection, and viral RNA has been detected up to 18 months post-infection in humans [47]. Therefore, we next assessed whether nutrition affects viral RNA persistence in mice. We collected footpads from obese, LP, and lean mice 65 days post MAYV (Fig 8) or RRV (S9 Fig) infection to test for viral RNA levels. Obese mice had significantly lower levels of MAYV RNA in their footpads compared to lean mice (p = 0.0476). Obese mice also had lower levels of RRV RNA in their footpads 65 days post-infection compared to controls (p = 0.0470). No infectious virus was observed in any of these samples.

Fig 8. Obese mice have reduced chronic RNA levels.

Fig 8

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and after 65 days post-infection footpads were collected. Viral RNA was quantified using qRT-PCR. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05.

Discussion

Obesity is a global issue, with rates tripling since 1975 [12]. At the same time, roughly 10% of adults globally are underweight [12]. Obesity has been associated with increased disease severity upon infection with CHIKV in humans [17,23,48]. In contrast, no information exists regarding the relationship between alphavirus infection/disease and undernutrition. In this study, we sought to clarify the relationship between nutrition and alphavirus infection. More explicitly, we aimed to examine the role of both obesity and undernutrition on infection, transmission, and evolution of arthritogenic alphaviruses, focusing on MAYV but including other important human pathogens, CHIKV and RRV. We fed mice different diets leading to either obesity or undernutrition and compared them to lean control mice. Obese mice experienced more severe morbidity upon infection for all three arthritogenic viruses tested. These results are consistent with previous studies showing an association between body-mass index (BMI) and more severe disease sequelae in humans following CHIKV infection [23]. In these studies, undernutrition did not result in more severe morbidity in acute arthritis models of infection with either CHIKV or MAYV. Our use of only one type of undernutrition, protein-energy malnutrition, limits our ability to generate definite conclusions on undernutrition generally since undernutrition also includes micronutrient deficiencies or general energy deficits. It is possible that other forms of undernutrition alter infection differently than protein-energy malnutrition. To our knowledge, no studies have specifically looked at the relationship between undernutrition and alphavirus disease severity. However, several conflicting studies with dengue virus (DENV) have shown that undernutrition may be associated with both protection [24,25] or increased susceptibility to [22] DENV disease.

We next showed that obesity alters viral replication. For MAYV and CHIKV infection, we observed increased early viral replication in the blood of obese mice compared to lean controls. It is unlikely that this was due to faster local replication at the injection site (hind left footpad) since we observed no differences in viral replication on day 2 post-infection in obese mice footpads (Fig 4A). These results suggest that diet did not alter early replication in the joint. Given the inflammatory nature of obesity (reviewed in [49]) and the fact that obesity alters epithelial cell permeability [50], it is possible that the difference in early virus replication may reflect faster escape from the tissues, resulting in a more rapid systemic spread. No clear, repeatable differences in viral replication were observed between LP mice and lean controls. It is possible that the diet used in these studies was not sufficiently low in protein and, as such, the mice were not fully malnourished. We used a 5% protein diet for these studies. Previous studies using a 2% protein diet found increased viral replication with both influenza virus [15] and Sendai virus [51]. However, this was not the case with respiratory syncytial virus, as no differences in viral replication were observed in 2% protein fed mice compared to lean controls [52]. According to Abrahams et al. [53], the range of energy from protein in forty Sub-Saharan African countries as a percentage is 6.08–13.47 ± 1.6, suggesting our use of 5% was more reflective of the current reality than 2%.

We next assessed the genetic diversity of virus isolated from mice fed different diets. Virus isolated from obese mice had both significantly lower total and non-synonymous Shannon entropy, a measure of information content that is maximum when all alleles are equifrequent, compared to lean mice. Furthermore, obese mice displayed a significantly lower variation rate, which identifies the specific accumulation of mutations in a population that may be associated with selective pressures, than lean controls. The difference between virus isolated from undernourished and lean mice approached but did not meet statistical significance for these metrics. Finally, we assessed region heterogeneity, a marker of replication fidelity not associated with selection, and found no differences among any of the groups. Collectively, these observations led us to hypothesize that there may be some selective pressure in obese mice that reduces viral genetic diversity. A previous study with Sendai virus in mice fed different diets found no differences in genetic diversity in virus isolated from bronchiolar lavage fluid [54]. It is possible that differences between Sendai virus, which is negative-sense, and MAYV, which is positive sense, account for this. For example, positive sense viruses have greater variability in mutation rates than negative sense counterparts [55]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that codon usage in positive sense viruses matches their hosts more closely than negative sense viruses, possibly because the genome acts as an mRNA [56]. Therefore, evolution likely differs significantly between negative and positive sense RNA viruses.

Since we sequenced virus from the blood from mice infected in the footpad, it is also conceivable that bottlenecks within the mice accounted for the observed differences. It is plausible that the virus replicated in the blood of obese mice more slowly later in infection due to the host immune response or other factors, which could account for both the reduction in viral titer on day 3 post-infection and the reduced genetic diversity. Obesity is known to alter the relative amounts of different leukocytes, potentially altering the availability of susceptible cells during infection or leading to a skewed cytokine response [57,58]. It is possible that differences in the immune status of mice from each group result in different selective pressures on the virus population. Several studies have shown that the innate immune system is involved in viral evolution [59,60]. Finally, obese mice are expected to have more adipocytes (i.e., fat cells) while undernourished mice are expected to have fewer. Adipocytes secrete a variety of cytokine-like molecules called adipokines that alter immune response and energy utilization [61,62]. Furthermore, adipocytes differentiate from fibroblasts [63], which are known targets of alphavirus replication [64,65], potentially making them targets for alphavirus replication. Future studies will aim to uncover the mechanism behind the differences in viral genetic diversity observed in mice fed different diets.

Previous studies from our group have shown that sufficient genetic diversity and replication fitness is required to maintain adaptability, dissemination, and efficient transmission [41,66,67]. Therefore, we hypothesized that virus isolated from obese mice might have reduced fitness and adaptability in a new environment. To test this, we first individually mixed MAYV isolated from the serum of mice fed different diets with a genetically marked reference virus and exposed them to a new environment by infecting new lean mice with this mix. Virus isolated from obese mice was found to have reduced fitness at the site of injection in the new environment compared to virus derived from lean mice. However, viral fitness was able to recover in the serum, as we observed no differences on days one or two post-infection. Future studies should probe fitness changes after multiple passages in hosts with different nutritional status, which might occur during an actual outbreak.

We next performed a mosquito transmission experiment by exposing mosquitoes to viremic mice previously fed different diets. For arboviruses, most transmission cycles require both the vertebrate and invertebrate host, which are highly divergent environments, a fact that restricts arbovirus evolution [68,69]. Mosquitoes that fed on obese mice displayed reduced infection and transmission rates compared to mosquitoes fed on lean control mice, despite no differences in viremia at the time of bloodmeal acquisition. These results point towards the decreased adaptability of virus isolated from obese mice, possibly due to the reduced genetic diversity observed in sequencing data. It is also possible that lipids or other factors in the blood that are altered in obesity or lipid changes in the virions themselves altered rates of transmission to mosquitoes in obese mice. Only mosquitoes that were fully bloodfed were selected for testing, and viremia levels were not different between the groups, so each mosquito likely received roughly the same amount of infectious virus. These data suggest that obese individuals may provide a certain level of refractoriness against subsequent viral transmission. Nutrition has been linked previously to virus fitness in mice fed either a selenium or vitamin E deficient diet and then infected with Coxsackie B3 virus; the virus was found to evolve quickly to a more virulent genotype [70,71]. Nelson et al. observed similar results in selenium-deficient mice infected with influenza virus, as a new virulent strain emerged from a previously low virulence progenitor strain in selenium-deficient but not selenium-adequate mice [72]. Finally, 10 passages of Sendai virus in mice fed a control, high-fat, or low-selenium diet did not result in differences in genetic diversity (as measured by Shannon entropy) in the virus population. However, the virus populations displayed phenotypic differences upon infection of a new host, suggesting that nutritional status influenced the virus population and resulting transmission. It is possible that their sequencing approach was not sensitive enough to detect genetic differences within the population. Given the prevalence of obesity, undernutrition, and nutrient deficiencies, future studies should elucidate the influence of nutritional status on virus fitness and adaptation to novel environments.

Arthritogenic alphaviruses are known to cause chronic inflammation, and CHIKV RNA and protein have been found in an infected human up to 18-months post initial infection [47]. Furthermore, CHIKV has been found in the infected joints of mice up to 16 weeks post-infection [73]. Therefore, we sought to assess whether nutrition influences persistent alphavirus replication in the joints of mice. We found that obese mice had significantly lower levels of RNA for both MAYV and RRV 65 days post-infection compared to lean controls. However, it is unclear what role persistent viral replication plays in chronic alphavirus disease, as long-term disease in humans is strongly associated with the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines but not necessarily viral RNA [74]. Therefore, obesity may be involved in persistent alphavirus replication, which may be involved in chronic disease.

These studies highlight the importance of nutrition in alphavirus infection and provide further support for the need to consider this population in epidemiological studies and vaccine trials. Furthermore, malnutrition represents a simple way to alter the immune landscape of an animal, making it possible to identify host factors involved in virus replication, transmission, evolution, and pathogenesis. Future studies with additional medically relevant arboviruses should continue to probe this relationship.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Removing the RNA extraction step increases the quantity of RNA detected from serum samples.

Serum samples from mice infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) were used to assess the necessity for an RNA extraction step before one-step quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR was performed using the NEB Luna Universal Probe kit with MAYV specific primers. For RNA extractions, the Zymo Viral DNA/RNA extraction kit was used. For testing without extraction, the samples were diluted 1:5 in PBS and then used directly for qRT-PCR. Viral RNA prepared from an infectious clone was serially diluted in ten-fold dilutions and used to generate a standard curve. The sample values were then fit to this standard curve and the volumes normalized to calculate the number of genome copies per mL of serum (genomes/mL). The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical comparison was performed using a two-tailed paired t-test.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Weights of mice following feeding on different diets.

Groups of C57BL/6N (A-B, 7–14 mice per group) or Balb/c (C, 5 mice per group) were fed a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or a control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Weights were measured weekly or bi-weekly following the initiation of feeding. Weights are plotted in grams. Statistical comparisons were made using a two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows–ns (not significant) p>0.05, * P<0.05, **** p<0.0001. The **** represents the comparison between the lean and obese groups. The * represents the comparison between the lean and the low protein groups. The error bars represent standard error. Each graph represents data obtained from at least two independent experiments except for C, which was performed once. The results from one representative experiment are presented.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Weights of mice following infection with different alphaviruses.

Groups of C57BL/6N (A-B, 7–14 mice per group) or Balb/c (C, 5 mice per group) were fed a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or a control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV, A), chikungunya virus (CHIKV, B), or Ross River virus (RRV, C). Weights were measured daily following infection. Weights are plotted in grams. The error bars represent standard error. Each graph represents data obtained from at least two independent experiments except for C, which was performed once. The results from one representative experiment are presented.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Histological lesions in mice with varying nutritional status.

Groups of C57BL/6N mice were fed either 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP) or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Nine days post-infection, the left hind footpad was collected and placed into formalin for fixation. The fixed tissues were then sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and then scored in a blinded manner by two independent anatomic pathologists following the scoring guide presented by Hawman et al. 2013. Scale bar, 100 μM. Images are representative of 2 mice per group. The arrows represent areas of myositis.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Histological scores in mice with varying nutritional status.

Groups of C57BL/6N mice were fed either 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP) or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Nine days post-infection, the left hind footpad was collected and placed into formalin for fixation. The fixed tissues were then sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and then scored in a blinded manner by two independent anatomic pathologists following the scoring guide presented by Hawman et al. 2013. The middle bar represents the median.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Organ titers of mice fed different diets.

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (9–10 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and 2-days post-infection the liver (A) and spleen (B) were collected. Viral titer was measured in the tissue homogenates by plaque assay. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. No statistically significant differences were found.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Sequencing coverage was even among the different groups tested.

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control diet (Lean) for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and blood was collected two days later. RNA was isolated from the serum and next-generation sequencing libraries were prepared and then sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500. The FASTQ files were trimmed for adapter and low-quality sequences using BBDuk. The trimmed reads were then analyzed using the ViVAN pipeline with a coverage cutoff of >100x and a p-value filter of 0.05. From the output of ViVAN, we compared the sequencing coverage depth. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction and compared to the control group.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Wild-type and marked reference virus fitness qRT-PCR is highly specific and sensitive.

10-fold dilutions of RNA derived from either wild-type (WT) or the marked reference (REF) Mayaro virus (MAYV) infectious clone plasmids were made. RNA was then mixed at a 1:1 ratio between WT MAYV and REF MAYV to simulate a mixed infection. Probe-based qRT-PCR was then performed with either a probe specific for WT MAYV (A) or REF MAYV (B). Forty cycles of PCR were performed. The dotted line represents the limit of detection. Any point that did not produce a Ct value was given an arbitrary Ct value of 41.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Obese mice have reduced chronic RNA levels.

Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and footpads were collected 65 days post-infection. Viral RNA was quantified using qRT-PCR. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Composition of diets used in feeding experiments.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Primers and probes used for real-time PCR.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are incredibly grateful to Yannis Michalakis and Renaud Vitalis for their stimulating discussions on genetic bottlenecks and thorough review of the manuscript. We thank Brandy Russell at the CDC for providing the virus strains used in these studies. We are grateful to Andrew Routh for his kind assistance with data analysis. We would also like to acknowledge Janet Webster for her thoughtful review of the manuscript. We much appreciate Yves Janin, Jean-Pierre Levraud, and Gabriella Passoni for their collaborations and enjoyable discussions. Finally, we are indebted to the animal care technicians and other technical staff at the Pasteur Institute, without whom this work would not have been possible.

Data Availability

All next-generation sequencing files are uploaded to the small read archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA573904.

Funding Statement

This work was partially funded by the DARPA program PREventing EMerging Pathogenic Threats (PREEMPT) awarded to MV and JWL. Partial funding was also provided by a faculty start-up package at Virginia Tech awarded to JWL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

References

  • 1.Outbreak news. Chikungunya and dengue, south-west Indian Ocean. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2006;81: 106–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yactayo S, Staples JE, Millot V, Cibrelus L, Ramon-Pardo P. Epidemiology of Chikungunya in the Americas. J Infect Dis. 2016;214: S441–S445. 10.1093/infdis/jiw390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yu W, Mengersen K, Dale P, Mackenzie JS, Toloo GS, Wang X, et al. Epidemiologic patterns of Ross River virus disease in Queensland, Australia, 2001–2011. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91: 109–118. 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klapsing P, MacLean JD, Glaze S, McClean KL, Drebot MA, Lanciotti RS, et al. Ross River virus disease reemergence, Fiji, 2003–2004. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11: 613–615. 10.3201/eid1104.041070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lednicky J, De Rochars VMB, Elbadry M, Loeb J, Telisma T, Chavannes S, et al. Mayaro Virus in Child with Acute Febrile Illness, Haiti, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22: 2000–2002. 10.3201/eid2211.161015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Suhrbier A, Jaffar-Bandjee M-C, Gasque P. Arthritogenic alphaviruses—an overview. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8: 420–429. 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levi LI, Vignuzzi M. A rthritogenic Alphaviruses: A Worldwide Emerging Threat? Microorganisms. 2019;7 10.3390/microorganisms7050133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Freitas ARR, Gérardin P, Kassar L, Donalisio MR. Excess deaths associated with the 2014 chikungunya epidemic in Jamaica. Pathog Glob Health. 2019; 1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Freitas ARR, Cavalcanti L, Von Zuben AP, Donalisio MR. Excess Mortality Related to Chikungunya Epidemics in the Context of Co-circulation of Other Arboviruses in Brazil. PLoS Curr. 2017;9 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.14608e586cd321d8d5088652d7a0d884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mavalankar D, Shastri P, Bandyopadhyay T, Parmar J, Ramani KV. Increased mortality rate associated with chikungunya epidemic, Ahmedabad, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14: 412–415. 10.3201/eid1403.070720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Obesity and overweight [Internet]. [cited 26 Feb 2019]. Available: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
  • 12.Abarca-Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Acosta-Cazares B, Acuin C, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390: 2627–2642. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Malnutrition [Internet]. [cited 6 Mar 2019]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dobner J, Kaser S. Body mass index and the risk of infection—from underweight to obesity. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24: 24–28. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Taylor AK, Cao W, Vora KP, De La Cruz J, Shieh W-J, Zaki SR, et al. Protein energy malnutrition decreases immunity and increases susceptibility to influenza infection in mice. J Infect Dis. 2013;207: 501–510. 10.1093/infdis/jis527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Karlsson EA, Hertz T, Johnson C, Mehle A, Krammer F, Schultz-Cherry S. Obesity Outweighs Protection Conferred by Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccination. MBio. 2016;7 10.1128/mBio.01144-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moser J-AS, Galindo-Fraga A, Ortiz-Hernández AA, Gu W, Hunsberger S, Galán-Herrera J-F, et al. Underweight, overweight, and obesity as independent risk factors for hospitalization in adults and children from influenza and other respiratory viruses. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2019;13: 3–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sheridan PA, Paich HA, Handy J, Karlsson EA, Hudgens MG, Sammon AB, et al. Obesity is associated with impaired immune response to influenza vaccination in humans. Int J Obes. 2012;36: 1072–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schwarz NG, Girmann M, Randriamampionona N, Bialonski A, Maus D, Krefis AC, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies against Chikungunya, Dengue, and Rift Valley fever viruses after febrile illness outbreak, Madagascar. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18: 1780–1786. 10.3201/eid1811.111036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fritel X, Rollot O, Gerardin P, Gauzere BA, Bideault J, Lagarde L, et al. Chikungunya virus infection during pregnancy, Reunion, France, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16: 418–425. 10.3201/eid1603.091403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ahlm C, Eliasson M, Vapalahti O, Evander M. Seroprevalence of Sindbis virus and associated risk factors in northern Sweden. Epidemiol Infect. 2014;142: 1559–1565. 10.1017/S0950268813002239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kalayanarooj S, Nimmannitya S. Is dengue severity related to nutritional status? Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36: 378–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Padmakumar B, Jayan JB, Menon R, Kottarathara AJ. Clinical profile of chikungunya sequelae, association with obesity and rest during acute phase. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41: 85–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thisyakorn U, Nimmannitya S. Nutritional status of children with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16: 295–297. 10.1093/clind/16.2.295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Libraty DH, Zhang L, Woda M, Giaya K, Kathivu CL, Acosta LP, et al. Low adiposity during early infancy is associated with a low risk for developing dengue hemorrhagic fever: a preliminary model. PLoS One. 2014;9: e88944 10.1371/journal.pone.0088944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Argüelles JM, Hernández M, Mazart I. [Nutritional evaluation of children and adolescents with a diagnosis of dengue]. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1987;103: 245–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marón GM, Clará AW, Diddle JW, Pleités EB, Miller L, Macdonald G, et al. Association between nutritional status and severity of dengue infection in children in El Salvador. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82: 324–329. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nguyen TH, Nguyen TL, Lei H-Y, Lin Y-S, Le BL, Huang K-J, et al. Association between sex, nutritional status, severity of dengue hemorrhagic fever, and immune status in infants with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72: 370–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stapleford KA, Moratorio G, Henningsson R, Chen R, Matheus S, Enfissi A, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis from the Chikungunya Virus Caribbean Outbreak Reveals Novel Evolutionary Genomic Elements. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10: e0004402 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chuong C, Bates TA, Weger-Lucarelli J. Infectious cDNA clones of two strains of Mayaro virus for studies on viral pathogenesis and vaccine development. Virology. 2019;535: 227–231. 10.1016/j.virol.2019.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sun C, Gardner CL, Watson AM, Ryman KD, Klimstra WB. Stable, high-level expression of reporter proteins from improved alphavirus expression vectors to track replication and dissemination during encephalitic and arthritogenic disease. J Virol. 2014;88: 2035–2046. 10.1128/JVI.02990-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coffey LL, Vignuzzi M. Host alternation of chikungunya virus increases fitness while restricting population diversity and adaptability to novel selective pressures. J Virol. 2011;85: 1025–1035. 10.1128/JVI.01918-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Weger-Lucarelli J, Duggal NK, Brault AC, Geiss BJ, Ebel GD. Rescue and Characterization of Recombinant Virus from a New World Zika Virus Infectious Clone. J Vis Exp. 2017; 10.3791/55857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weger-Lucarelli J, Aliota MT, Wlodarchak N, Kamlangdee A, Swanson R, Osorio JE. Dissecting the Role of E2 Protein Domains in Alphavirus Pathogenicity. J Virol. 2015;90: 2418–2433. 10.1128/JVI.02792-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pinto AK, Daffis S, Brien JD, Gainey MD, Yokoyama WM, Sheehan KCF, et al. A temporal role of type I interferon signaling in CD8+ T cell maturation during acute West Nile virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e1002407 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Karkeni E, Morin SO, Bou Tayeh B, Goubard A, Josselin E, Castellano R, et al. Vitamin D Controls Tumor Growth and CD8+ T Cell Infiltration in Breast Cancer. Front Immunol. 2019;10: 1307 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pastorino B, Bessaud M, Grandadam M, Murri S, Tolou HJ, Peyrefitte CN. Development of a TaqMan RT-PCR assay without RNA extraction step for the detection and quantification of African Chikungunya viruses. J Virol Methods. 2005;124: 65–71. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wilm A, Aw PPK, Bertrand D, Yeo GHT, Ong SH, Wong CH, et al. LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: 11189–11201. 10.1093/nar/gks918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27: 2156–2158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Isakov O, Bordería AV, Golan D, Hamenahem A, Celniker G, Yoffe L, et al. Deep sequencing analysis of viral infection and evolution allows rapid and detailed characterization of viral mutant spectrum. Bioinformatics. 2015;31: 2141–2150. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bordería AV, Isakov O, Moratorio G, Henningsson R, Agüera-González S, Organtini L, et al. Group Selection and Contribution of Minority Variants during Virus Adaptation Determines Virus Fitness and Phenotype. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11: e1004838 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Barbezange C, Jones L, Blanc H, Isakov O, Celniker G, Enouf V, et al. Seasonal Genetic Drift of Human Influenza A Virus Quasispecies Revealed by Deep Sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2018;9: 2596 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Moratorio G, Henningsson R, Barbezange C, Carrau L, Bordería AV, Blanc H, et al. Attenuation of RNA viruses by redirecting their evolution in sequence space. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2: 17088 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Davis NL, Willis LV, Smith JF, Johnston RE. In vitro synthesis of infectious venezuelan equine encephalitis virus RNA from a cDNA clone: analysis of a viable deletion mutant. Virology. 1989;171: 189–204. 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90526-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Maurya R, Bhattacharya P, Dey R, Nakhasi HL. Leptin Functions in Infectious Diseases [Internet]. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Seay AR, Griffin DE, Johnson RT. Experimental viral polymyositis: age dependency and immune responses to Ross River virus infection in mice. Neurology. 1981;31: 656–660. 10.1212/wnl.31.6.656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hoarau J-J, Jaffar Bandjee M-C, Krejbich Trotot P, Das T, Li-Pat-Yuen G, Dassa B, et al. Persistent chronic inflammation and infection by Chikungunya arthritogenic alphavirus in spite of a robust host immune response. J Immunol. 2010;184: 5914–5927. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Borgherini G, Poubeau P, Staikowsky F, Lory M, Le Moullec N, Becquart JP, et al. Outbreak of chikungunya on Reunion Island: early clinical and laboratory features in 157 adult patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44: 1401–1407. 10.1086/517537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reilly SM, Saltiel AR. Adapting to obesity with adipose tissue inflammation. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13: 633–643. 10.1038/nrendo.2017.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ahmad R, Rah B, Bastola D, Dhawan P, Singh AB. Obesity-induces Organ and Tissue Specific Tight Junction Restructuring and Barrier Deregulation by Claudin Switching. Sci Rep. 2017;7: 5125 10.1038/s41598-017-04989-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pena-Cruz V, Reiss CS, McIntosh K. Sendai virus infection of mice with protein malnutrition. J Virol. 1989;63: 3541–3544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Peña-Cruz V, Reiss C, McIntosh K. Effect of respiratory syncytial virus infection on mice with protein malnutrition. J Med Virol. 1991;33: 219–223. 10.1002/jmv.1890330402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Abrahams Z, McHiza Z, Steyn NP. Diet and mortality rates in Sub-Saharan Africa: stages in the nutrition transition. BMC Public Health. 2011;11: 801 10.1186/1471-2458-11-801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peña J, Chen-Harris H, Allen JE, Hwang M, Elsheikh M, Mabery S, et al. Sendai virus intra-host population dynamics and host immunocompetence influence viral virulence during in vivo passage. Virus Evol. 2016;2: vew008 10.1093/ve/vew008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Combe M, Sanjuán R. Variability in the mutation rates of RNA viruses. Future Virol. 2014;9: 605–615. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Phakaratsakul S, Sirihongthong T, Boonarkart C, Suptawiwat O, Auewarakul P. Genome polarity of RNA viruses reflects the different evolutionary pressures shaping codon usage [Internet]. Archives of Virology. 2018. pp. 2883–2888. 10.1007/s00705-018-3930-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Misumi I, Starmer J, Uchimura T, Beck MA, Magnuson T, Whitmire JK. Obesity Expands a Distinct Population of T Cells in Adipose Tissue and Increases Vulnerability to Infection. Cell Rep. 2019;27: 514–524.e5. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nagareddy PR, Kraakman M, Masters SL, Stirzaker RA, Gorman DJ, Grant RW, et al. Adipose tissue macrophages promote myelopoiesis and monocytosis in obesity. Cell Metab. 2014;19: 821–835. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Arataki K, Kumada H, Toyota K, Ohishi W, Takahashi S, Tazuma S, et al. Evolution of hepatitis C virus quasispecies during ribavirin and interferon-alpha-2b combination therapy and interferon-alpha-2b monotherapy. Intervirology. 2006;49: 352–361. 10.1159/000095155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hernández-Alonso P, Garijo R, Cuevas JM, Sanjuán R. Experimental evolution of an RNA virus in cells with innate immunity defects. Virus Evol. 2015;1 10.1093/ve/vev008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mancuso P. The role of adipokines in chronic inflammation. Immunotargets Ther. 2016;5: 47–56. 10.2147/ITT.S73223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Trayhurn P, Wood IS. Adipokines: inflammation and the pleiotropic role of white adipose tissue. Br J Nutr. 2004;92: 347–355. 10.1079/bjn20041213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tontonoz P, Hu E, Spiegelman BM. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPARγ2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell. 1994; Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/009286749490006X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Couderc T, Chrétien F, Schilte C, Disson O, Brigitte M, Guivel-Benhassine F, et al. A mouse model for Chikungunya: young age and inefficient type-I interferon signaling are risk factors for severe disease. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4: e29 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sourisseau M, Schilte C, Casartelli N, Trouillet C. Characterization of reemerging chikungunya virus. PLoS. 2007; Available: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id = 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vignuzzi M, Stone JK, Arnold JJ, Cameron CE, Andino R. Quasispecies diversity determines pathogenesis through cooperative interactions in a viral population. Nature. 2006;439: 344–348. 10.1038/nature04388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Coffey LL, Beeharry Y, Bordería AV, Blanc H, Vignuzzi M. Arbovirus high fidelity variant loses fitness in mosquitoes and mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 16038–16043. 10.1073/pnas.1111650108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Forrester NL, Guerbois M, Seymour RL, Spratt H, Weaver SC. Vector-borne transmission imposes a severe bottleneck on an RNA virus population. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8: e1002897 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Weger-Lucarelli J, Garcia SM, Rückert C, Byas A, O’Connor SL, Aliota MT, et al. Using barcoded Zika virus to assess virus population structure in vitro and in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Virology. 2018;521: 138–148. 10.1016/j.virol.2018.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Beck MA, Shi Q, Morris VC, Levander OA. Rapid genomic evolution of a non-virulent coxsackievirus B3 in selenium-deficient mice results in selection of identical virulent isolates. Nat Med. 1995;1: 433–436. 10.1038/nm0595-433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Levander OA, Beck MA. Interacting nutritional and infectious etiologies of Keshan disease. Insights from coxsackie virus B-induced myocarditis in mice deficient in selenium or vitamin E. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1997;56: 5–21. 10.1007/BF02778980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nelson HK, Shi Q, Van Dael P, Schiffrin EJ, Blum S, Barclay D, et al. Host nutritional selenium status as a driving force for influenza virus mutations1. The FASEB Journal. 2001; 10.1096/fj.01-0115fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hawman DW, Stoermer KA, Montgomery SA, Pal P, Oko L, Diamond MS, et al. Chronic joint disease caused by persistent Chikungunya virus infection is controlled by the adaptive immune response. J Virol. 2013;87: 13878–13888. 10.1128/JVI.02666-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mostafavi H, Abeyratne E, Zaid A, Taylor A. Arthritogenic Alphavirus-Induced Immunopathology and Targeting Host Inflammation as A Therapeutic Strategy for Alphaviral Disease. Viruses. 2019;11 10.3390/v11030290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Richard J Kuhn, Mark T Heise

31 Jul 2019

Dear Dr. Weger-Lucarelli:

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Host Nutritional Status Affects Alphavirus Virulence, Transmission, and Evolution" (PPATHOGENS-D-19-01146) for review by PLOS Pathogens. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some aspects of the manuscript that should be improved.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition, when you are ready to resubmit, please be prepared to provide the following:

(1) A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

(2) Two versions of the manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within 60 days or less. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we ask that you let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

[LINK]

If you have any questions or concerns while you make these revisions, please let us know.

Sincerely,

Richard J. Kuhn, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Mark Heise

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Grant McFadden

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-3526

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This is an important piece of work that is aimed at understanding the effects of nutrition on alphavirus infections. The effects of host nutrition on virus infections in general is an understudied and under appreciated area. Therefore this paper has important implications for human health in an increasingly obese environment. However, there are some concerns with the paper that need to addressed.

Reviewer #2: In their manuscript, Weger-Lucarelli et. al. describe their study of nutritional influences on alphavirus infection mouse models. The authors find some interesting correlations between obesity/undernutrition and alphavirus infection. The paper is well written and clear and, overall, very good work. The topic is extremely novel and timely, especially with the global syndemic of malnutrition and endemic and emerging infectious diseases. However, some questions/issues exist and should be addressed in the context of these studies.

Reviewer #3: This study attempts to identify an important and previously unexplored link between host nutritional status and alphavirus infection. The study is straightforward and clearly outlined. The results are well presented. Statistics are acceptable. The discussion is well done with the exception of lines 400-409 which is essentially a repeat of the results. See below for specific comments:

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: 1. Supplementary Table 1 was not included with the manuscript. This table described the nutrient content of the diets, so this is critical missing piece. I am assuming this was just an oversight by the authors

2. In the introduction, the authors state that they fed mice two high fat diets-45% and 61%, but the data presented only includes 45% high fat diets. Did they use the 61% diet? And if so, did the results mirror the 45% diet? This would be important information to know.

3. Authors should present actual weights (figures 1 and 2) of mice rather than just percent loss or percent gain of weight. It can be added as supplementary data, but it needs to be there. The readers have no idea if the starting weights were identical, and how much weight in grams were lost or gained. How many grams were the obese mice?

4. The authors mention diabetes in the discussion, but no metabolic markers were provided. What were the glucose levels of the mice? Were they, in fact, diabetic?

5. The authors measure leptin, but it’s unclear what the point is. It’s well known that leptin levels increase with adiposity. They did not see a leptin difference between low protein and control diet-what is the significance of this finding? Does it matter? This data could be removed, unless the authors provide more context. It seems to be just “thrown in” as a piece of data.

6. The legend for the stats on figure 1A is not clear. You have to read the text to understand the purpose of the one star that is shown on the data. The stats information should be clearly stated in the figure legend.

7. With the CHIKV challenge, why were weight actually increasing after infection for the non-obese groups?

8. For the pathology slides in Supp Fig 2, it would be helpful for the readers to use arrows to point out the inflammation, and to provide what histopathological score the photos represent.

9. The authors wanted to see if their results would be similar using a strain of mouse different from the B6 mice. This is a logical step, however, they also had to treat the mice with antibody to block type-I IFN-again, a major departure from the B6 mice. So this is not a good comparison between strains.

10. In the discussion section, they claim that the model of RRV led to 60% of the undernourished mice and 40% of the obese died from the infection, yet all the lean mice lived. However, in the results section, they state that 2 mice from the obese group and 3 mice from the LP group died-out of a total of 7 mice. This is not 60% mortality. And, they also state that the results were not statistically significant, so this does not rise to a level that needs to be discussed.

Reviewer #2: 1) Type of fat included in the diet can be very influential on the outcomes of experimental infection. How was this particular diet chosen as a proxy for biological relevance? Also, it may be good include a genetically obese model in the experimentation to show that obesity itself and not diet, can result in similar changes as observed in these studies. This would also be a very interesting question to help cover the influence of leptin on outcomes of these experiments as the authors have chosen to use this measure as a proxy of nutritional status.

2) Since adipose tissue is a highly vascularized organ, it is possible that the virus is being trapped in the extra adipose and that is why the authors do not observe differences (or even lowered) viremia? Was any attempt made to measure viral particles in other tissues (especially adipose) aside from the footpad and serum? Similar studies would be interesting for the persistence of viral RNA. Please consider doing this experimentation.

Reviewer #3: None

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: Some paragraphs in the discussion need to be broken up for better readability.

Reviewer #2: 1) In the introduction, the authors refer to four different diets (Line 90), but only discuss three diets in the feeding methodology described on lines 140-141. Please consider revising for consistency. The remainder of the paper only refers to the 45% diet. If data is available for the 61% diet, please include in the paper.

2) Please give references in the methodology text for successful employment of these diets in previous studies.

3) Was any kind of clinical score (semi-quantitiative) taken during the mouse infections to monitor health of the animals? Hunching, coat quality, etc all could be monitored to increase knowledge of morbidity in these animals.

4) Lines 256: “weight gain” should just be “weight”?

5) Please show all data from C57 versus Balb/c experimentation, including leptin measurements. This data is especially important as these animals are generally less susceptible to dietary treatment that the more widely used C57Bl/6 mice.

6) The data from the serological viral titer determination and the luminescence studies seems to be contradictory. Was viremia/RNAemia measured at day 6 between obese and healthy models?

7) Is 2 days generally accepted as the period of time with the most changes in the viral quasispecies? This would be especially important to ask if a virus from a LP or obese mouse cause differential morbidity or mortality in a lean host aside from changes in fitness?

8) How do the genetic changes in the viruses correlate to pathogenicity of the viral species themselves aside from fitness?

9) While the LP diet is interesting (as it represents one of the main types of malnutrition, kwashiorkor), other types of malnutrition exist in areas endemic for these virsues including complete marasmus, caloric restriction, and micronutrient deficiencies. Can the authors further comment on how different types of undernutrition could further change the results of this study?

Reviewer #3: How much Protein is in the control diet? Currently, only obese and lean are described.

Figure 2: There is an interesting bi- or tri-phasic behavior in the foot pad swelling. Is there an explanation for this? It seems consistent in MAYV and CHIKV both. Also, line 255 says CHIKV and RRV, but only CHIKV is discussed. Was the data and discussion for RRV missed? It would be important to mention since E and F have a different mouse with RRV. Readers may be interested in the RRV C57bL/6 data for comparison.

Figure 4: B,C and D, labels difficult to see. What A represents is unclear. What ‘flux’ are we measuring?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 1

Richard J Kuhn, Mark T Heise

17 Sep 2019

Dear Dr. Weger-Lucarelli,

We are pleased to inform that your manuscript, "Host Nutritional Status Affects Alphavirus Virulence, Transmission, and Evolution", has been editorially accepted for publication at PLOS Pathogens. 

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted and sent to production, you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive by email within a week. Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes.

IMPORTANT NOTES

(1) Please note, once your paper is accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plospathogens@plos.org.

(2) Copyediting and Proofreading: The corresponding author will receive a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. 

(3) Appropriate Figure Files: Please remove all name and figure # text from your figure files. Please also take this time to check that your figures are of high resolution, which will improve the readbility of your figures and help expedite your manuscript's publication. Please note that figures must have been originally created at 300dpi or higher. Do not manually increase the resolution of your files. For instructions on how to properly obtain high quality images, please review our Figure Guidelines, with examples at: http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/figures.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

(4) Striking Image: Please upload a striking still image to accompany your article if one is available (you can include a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). Should your paper be accepted, this image will be considered for our monthly issue image and may also appear on our website to feature your article. Please upload this as a separate file, selecting "striking image" as the file type upon upload. Please also include a separate "Other" file with a caption, including credits and any potential copyright information. Please do not include the caption in the main article file. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License at http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/content-license. Please note that PLOS cannot publish copyrighted images.

(5) Press Release or Related Media: If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team in advance at plospathogens@plos.org as soon as possible. We ask that you contact us within one week to plan ahead of our fast Production schedule. If you need to know your paper's publication date for related media purposes, you must coordinate with our press team, and your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. 

(6)  PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager.  To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager

(7) Update your Profile Information: Now that your manuscript has been provisionally accepted, please log into Editorial Manager and update your profile, if needed. Go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/ppathogens, log in, and click on the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page. Please update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. 

(8) LaTeX users only: Our staff will ask you to upload a TEX file in addition to the PDF before the paper can be sent to typesetting, so please carefully review our Latex Guidelines http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/latex in the meantime.

(9) If you have associated protocols in protocols.io, please ensure that you make them public before publication to guarantee immediate access to the methodological details.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens. 

Best regards,

Richard J. Kuhn, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Mark Heise

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Grant McFadden

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-3526

***********************************************************

The authors have responded to each of the three reviewers' questions and concerns. Significant improvements and clarification were made as a result. The response was appropriate and the manuscript has been improved as a consequence and is now acceptable for publication.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Richard J Kuhn, Mark T Heise

2 Oct 2019

Dear Dr. Weger-Lucarelli,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Host Nutritional Status Affects Alphavirus Virulence, Transmission, and Evolution," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Grant McFadden

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-3526

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Removing the RNA extraction step increases the quantity of RNA detected from serum samples.

    Serum samples from mice infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) were used to assess the necessity for an RNA extraction step before one-step quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR was performed using the NEB Luna Universal Probe kit with MAYV specific primers. For RNA extractions, the Zymo Viral DNA/RNA extraction kit was used. For testing without extraction, the samples were diluted 1:5 in PBS and then used directly for qRT-PCR. Viral RNA prepared from an infectious clone was serially diluted in ten-fold dilutions and used to generate a standard curve. The sample values were then fit to this standard curve and the volumes normalized to calculate the number of genome copies per mL of serum (genomes/mL). The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical comparison was performed using a two-tailed paired t-test.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Weights of mice following feeding on different diets.

    Groups of C57BL/6N (A-B, 7–14 mice per group) or Balb/c (C, 5 mice per group) were fed a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or a control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Weights were measured weekly or bi-weekly following the initiation of feeding. Weights are plotted in grams. Statistical comparisons were made using a two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows–ns (not significant) p>0.05, * P<0.05, **** p<0.0001. The **** represents the comparison between the lean and obese groups. The * represents the comparison between the lean and the low protein groups. The error bars represent standard error. Each graph represents data obtained from at least two independent experiments except for C, which was performed once. The results from one representative experiment are presented.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Weights of mice following infection with different alphaviruses.

    Groups of C57BL/6N (A-B, 7–14 mice per group) or Balb/c (C, 5 mice per group) were fed a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or a control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV, A), chikungunya virus (CHIKV, B), or Ross River virus (RRV, C). Weights were measured daily following infection. Weights are plotted in grams. The error bars represent standard error. Each graph represents data obtained from at least two independent experiments except for C, which was performed once. The results from one representative experiment are presented.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Histological lesions in mice with varying nutritional status.

    Groups of C57BL/6N mice were fed either 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP) or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Nine days post-infection, the left hind footpad was collected and placed into formalin for fixation. The fixed tissues were then sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and then scored in a blinded manner by two independent anatomic pathologists following the scoring guide presented by Hawman et al. 2013. Scale bar, 100 μM. Images are representative of 2 mice per group. The arrows represent areas of myositis.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Histological scores in mice with varying nutritional status.

    Groups of C57BL/6N mice were fed either 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP) or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Nine days post-infection, the left hind footpad was collected and placed into formalin for fixation. The fixed tissues were then sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and then scored in a blinded manner by two independent anatomic pathologists following the scoring guide presented by Hawman et al. 2013. The middle bar represents the median.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Organ titers of mice fed different diets.

    Groups of C57BL/6N mice (9–10 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and 2-days post-infection the liver (A) and spleen (B) were collected. Viral titer was measured in the tissue homogenates by plaque assay. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. No statistically significant differences were found.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Sequencing coverage was even among the different groups tested.

    Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control diet (Lean) for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and blood was collected two days later. RNA was isolated from the serum and next-generation sequencing libraries were prepared and then sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500. The FASTQ files were trimmed for adapter and low-quality sequences using BBDuk. The trimmed reads were then analyzed using the ViVAN pipeline with a coverage cutoff of >100x and a p-value filter of 0.05. From the output of ViVAN, we compared the sequencing coverage depth. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction and compared to the control group.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Wild-type and marked reference virus fitness qRT-PCR is highly specific and sensitive.

    10-fold dilutions of RNA derived from either wild-type (WT) or the marked reference (REF) Mayaro virus (MAYV) infectious clone plasmids were made. RNA was then mixed at a 1:1 ratio between WT MAYV and REF MAYV to simulate a mixed infection. Probe-based qRT-PCR was then performed with either a probe specific for WT MAYV (A) or REF MAYV (B). Forty cycles of PCR were performed. The dotted line represents the limit of detection. Any point that did not produce a Ct value was given an arbitrary Ct value of 41.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Obese mice have reduced chronic RNA levels.

    Groups of C57BL/6N mice (7 mice per group) were fed either a 45% fat (Obese), 5% protein (LP), or control (Lean) diet for 8–10 weeks. Mice were then infected with Mayaro virus (MAYV) and footpads were collected 65 days post-infection. Viral RNA was quantified using qRT-PCR. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum points, the box limits represent the 25th and 75th percentile, and the horizontal line represents the median. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction compared to the control group. The level of significance is represented as follows—* p<0.05.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Composition of diets used in feeding experiments.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Primers and probes used for real-time PCR.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers - PPATHOGENS-D-19-01146.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All next-generation sequencing files are uploaded to the small read archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA573904.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES