Abstract
Nephrolithiasis is a common disease affecting almost all populations, with an increasing prevalence over the past decades. Previous studies revealed several functional polymorphisms associated with the pathogenesis of nephrolithiasis. However, data on Asian populations are limited. In this study, three candidate polymorphisms were selected from previous studies to investigate the correlations with nephrolithiasis in a Taiwanese population. In total, 454 nephrolithiasis patients were recruited from Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, with SNP frequency for 1513 subjects of general population from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) as a genotypic reference. Results revealed that subjects with minor TT genotype at rs1256328 (alkaline phosphatase, liver/bone/kidney (ALPL)) have higher susceptibility to nephrolithiasis (odds ratio (OR) = 2.03, p = 0.0013). In addition, subjects carrying the minor AA genotype at rs12654812 (regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14)) have higher susceptibility to nephrolithiasis (OR = 1.91, p = 0.0017). Among nephrolithiasis patients, subjects with GG at rs7627468 (calcium-sensing receptor (CASR)) have lower pH level in urine (p = 0.0088). Importantly, rs7627468 is associated with the expressions of IQCB1 and EAF2. rs12654812 could influence the expression of RGS14 itself, MXD3, and FGFR4. In summary, this study successfully validated the genetic roles of rs1256328 and rs12654812 in human nephrolithiasis.
Subject terms: Genetic predisposition to disease, Renal calculi
Introduction
Kidney stone disease (nephrolithiasis) affects almost all populations worldwide with an increasing prevalence over the past few decades. The prevalence rate of nephrolithiasis was reported to be 5~15% in developed countries, but was as high as 20~25% in the Middle East1. In the United States, the prevalence of kidney stones was estimated to have increased from 3.8% in the 1970s to 8.8% in the 21st century2,3. In Asia, the prevalence of nephrolithiasis is 1–5%4.
Although many patients are persistently asymptomatic, some patients occasionally pass stones and experience hematuria. Paroxysmal renal colic may also occur and cause variable levels of pain5,6. Furthermore, nephrolithiasis is a disease of high recurrence risk with a relapse rate of 50% within 5~10 years and 75% at 20 years7,8. Continuous recurrence of kidney stone may lead to persistent renal obstruction and even permanent renal damage6. As a result, nephrolithiasis significantly influences patients’ quality of life and places a heavy burden on society and healthcare systems.
Many factors were suggested to elevate risks of nephrolithiasis, such as environmental exposure, low fluid intake, dietary intake, hypercalciuria, genetics, and a family’s health history. However, the etiology of nephrolithiasis remains unclear. A previous study of paired twins reported a higher concordance rate of the disease in monozygotic twins than that in dizygotic twins, suggesting that genetic factors may play a pivotal role in its etiology9. Furthermore, candidate gene association studies attempted to assess the roles of several genes involved in stone formation10. Previous studies indicated that genetic variances of the vitamin D receptor (VDR), osteopontin (OPN), and calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) genes were highly associated with nephrolithiasis11–17. The TRPV5 and CLCN5 genes were also proven to be important in the pathogenesis of nephrolithiasis18,19. In addition, genetic polymorphisms of calcium channel, ORAI1 (rs12313273, rs7135617, and rs6486795), were reporetd to associate with the development of nephrolithiasis20 ITPKC (rs2607420) is also associated with the estimated creatinine clearance in nephrolithiasis patients21.
Recently, some regions were found to be associated with nephrolithiasis by genome-wide association studies (GWASs) or meta-analysis of GWASs in various populations22–25. The first GWAS on idiopathic calcium oxalate urolithiasis was published in 2009 that identified a member of the claudin gene family (CLDN14) as a risk locus22. Three loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3, and 13q14.1 were reported to associate with kidney stones with an accumulative effect in a Japanese population23,24. Recently, Oddsson et al. indicated that four loci were associated with nephrolithiasis in an Icelandic population25, but this association has not been confirmed in any Asian population yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the selected polymorphisms from the previous GWAS report25 are associated with nephrolithiasis in a Taiwanese population.
In this study, nephrolithiasis patients were recruited from Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). Genotypic statistics of general population was obtained from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) project. We investigated the susceptibility variants with risk of nephrolithiasis in the Taiwanese population. Furthermore, associations of genetic variants with the stone frequency, stone number, clinical biochemical data, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were analyzed.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects
We investigated the regional prevalence of nephrolithiasis through the analysis of longitudinal health insurance data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis in Taiwan varies by geographical region. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis in 2010 was 3.9%, 5.95%, 4.62%, and 3.78% in northern, central, southern, and eastern Taiwan, respectively (Fig. S1). In this study, 454 nephrolithiasis patients were recruited (Table 1). Among these patients, the mean age was 53.4 ± 12.4 (SD) years, and 321 (70.7%) were male. The mean uric acid-to-creatinine ratio (UA/UCr), calcium-to-creatinine ratio (UCa/UCr), and creatinine levels in the urine were 0.5 ± 0.2, 0.1 ± 0.1, and 87.3 ± 56.3 mg/dL, respectively. As to serum data, the mean uric acid, calcium, and creatinine concentrations were 6.4 ± 1.7, 8.9 ± 0.6, 1.2 ± 0.9 mg/dL, respectively. In addition, genotypic statistics of 1,513 healthy subjects were obtained as general population from the next-generation sequencing data in Taiwan Biobank project. More than eighty percent of these subjects were recruited in southern and northern Taiwan (Fig. S2). Frequency of each polymorphism in these 1,513 subjects was used as genotypic reference of general population in this study. The frequencies of three SNPs from the 1,513 subjects were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Table 2).
Table 1.
Basal characteristics of 454 patients with nephrolithiasis and 1,513 control subjects from Taiwan Biobank.
| Characteristics | Case (n = 454) | TWBa (n = 1,513) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53.4 ± 12.4 | 49.5 ± 11.2 |
| Range | 19–86 | 30–70 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 321 (70.7%) | 761 (50.3%) |
| Female | 133 (29.3%) | 752 (49.7%) |
| BMI | 26.5 ± 4.2 | 24.4 ± 3.6 |
| Urine data | ||
| UUA/UCrb | 0.5 ± 0.2 | — |
| UCa/UCrc | 0.1 ± 0.1 | — |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 87.3 ± 56.3 | — |
| Serum data | ||
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 6.4 ± 1.7 | — |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 8.9 ± 0.6 | — |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.2 ± 0.9 | — |
| eGFR | ||
| MDRD (mL/min 1.73 m2) | 80.2 ± 28.4 | — |
| CG-GFR (mL/min) | 84.4 ± 28.7 | — |
aGeneral population from Taiwan Biobank.
bUrinary uric acid-to-creatinine ratio (UUA/UCr).
cUrinary calcium-to-creatinine ratio (UCa/UCr).
Table 2.
The basic characteristics of the SNPs (ALPL, CASR, RGS14) in different populations.
| Gene | position (hg38) | variant | Allele | Minor allele frequencies (MAF) | HWE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major | Minor | AFR | AMR | ASN | EUR | TWB | ||||
| ALPL | Chr1:21570274 | rs1256328 | C | T | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.57 |
| CASR | Chr3:122227252 | rs7627468 | A | G | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.46 | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.36 |
| RGS14 | Chr5:177367190 | rs12654812 | G | A | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.13 |
AFR, African. AMR, American, ASN, Asian. EUR, European. MAFs of TWB were obtained from Taiwan View website. Minor allele determined by MAF of TWB. HWE p value for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
SNPs rs1256328 and rs12654812 are associated with susceptibility to calcium nephrolithiasis
To investigate associations of polymorphisms with nephrolithiasis susceptibility, we compared the genotype and allele distributions between groups of nephrolithiasis patients and general populations for each SNP (Supplementary Table S1). Among three SNPs examined, rs1256328 (ALPL) and rs12654812 (RGS14) revealed significant differences in genotypic distributions, even after correction with SNP numbers (p = 0.0005 and 0.0072, respectively). rs12654812 (RGS14) also revealed a borderline significant difference in its allelic distribution (p = 0.0346). However, the significance did not persist after applying Bonferroni correction. For rs7627468 (CASR), no significant difference was observed. On the other hand, we also investigated associations of these two SNPs (rs1256328 and rs12654812) with nephrolithiasis susceptibility under different genetic models (Tables 3, 4). As to rs1256328 (ALPL) and rs12654812 (RGS14), the most significant associations were observed under a recessive model (p = 0.0013 and 0.0017, respectively), with estimated ORs of 2.03 and 1.91, respectively. These results indicate that subjects with the minor TT genotype at rs1256328 (ALPL) or the minor AA genotype at rs12654812 (RGS14) had higher susceptibility to nephrolithiasis, compared to those with major alleles in these two SNPs (C allele at rs1256328 (ALPL) or G allele at rs12654812 (RGS14)).
Table 3.
Association of rs1256328 with nephrolithiasis susceptibility.
| Model | Genotype | Case (%) | TWBa (%) | OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypic | TT | 33 (7.5) | 58 (3.9) | 1.87 (1.19–2.92) | 0.0055 |
| CT | 114 (26.0) | 493 (32.7) | 0.76 (0.60–0.97) | 0.0254 | |
| CC | 291 (66.5) | 955 (63.4) | Reference | — | |
| Dominant | TT + CT | 147 (33.5) | 551 (36.6) | 0.88 (0.70–1.10) | 0.2454 |
| CC | 291 (66.5) | 955 (63.4) | Reference | — | |
| Recessive | TT | 33 (7.5) | 58 (3.9) | 2.03 (1.31–3.16) | 0.0013 |
| CT + CC | 405 (92.5) | 1448 (96.1) | Reference | — | |
| Trend test | 0.8313 |
aGeneral population from Taiwan Biobank. P values which remain significant after performing Bonferroni correction (p ≤ 0.016) are shown in bold.
Table 4.
Association of rs12654812 with nephrolithiasis susceptibility.
| Model | Genotype | Case (%) | TWBa (%) | OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypic | AA | 39 (8.6) | 68 (4.9) | 1.93 (1.27–2.93) | 0.0019 |
| AG | 160 (37.1) | 523 (37.6) | 1.03 (0.82–1.92) | 0.8191 | |
| GG | 238 (54.3) | 799 (57.5) | Reference | — | |
| Dominant | AA + AG | 199 (45.7) | 591 (42.5) | 1.13 (0.91–1.40) | 0.2664 |
| GG | 238 (54.3) | 799 (57.5) | Reference | — | |
| Recessive | AA | 39 (8.6) | 68 (4.9) | 1.91 (1.27–2.87) | 0.0017 |
| AG + GG | 398 (91.4) | 1322 (95.1) | Reference | — | |
| Trend test | 0.0346 |
aGeneral population from Taiwan Biobank. P values which remain significant after performing Bonferroni correction (p ≤ 0.016) are shown in bold.
Polymorphisms of rs1256328, rs7627468, and rs12654812 were not associated with the risk of multiple stones or recurrence in patients with calcium nephrolithiasis
In our study, 224 patients had multiple stones and 203 had a single stone. Furthermore, 188 patients had recurrent episodes and 229 patients had a single episode. We tested whether the genotypes of these three SNPs (rs1256328, rs7627468, and rs12654812) were associated with the risk of multiple stones or recurrence of nephrolithiasis. As shown in Supplementary Table S2, we found no significant associations of these SNPs with the risk of multiple stones or recurrent calcium nephrolithiasis.
Quantitative trait locus analysis in nephrolithiasis patients
To understand relationships between polymorphisms and clinical risk factors, biochemical quantitative traits including calcium, uric acid, and creatinine in urine and in serum were analyzed. Among the urine data, we found that rs7627468 (CASR) was highly associated with the urine pH, before or after adjustment with gender and age (Table 5). Urine pH levels were lower in the GG genotype group in rs7627468 (CASR) than in the AG or AA genotype groups (p = 0.009; adjusted p = 0.0088). In addition, the rs12654812 (RGS14) AA genotype was potentially correlated with an increased UCa/UCr compared to the AG or GG genotypes in nephrolithiasis patients (p = 0.0764; adjusted p = 0.0532). After the subset analysis, we found that the CASR SNP (rs7627468) was associated with the UCa/UCr (p = 0.0170) (Table 6), and the estimated OR was 0.64. However, this association did not exist after applying multiple testing correction.
Table 5.
Association analysis between SNPs and clinical biochemical data in patients with kidney stone.
| SNP | Genotype | Urine Creatinine (mg/dl) | Urine pH | UCa/UCra | UUA/UCrb | Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) | Serum Calcium (mg/dl) | Serum Uric Acid (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALPLrs1256328 | TT | 71.2 ± 42.2 | 6.2 ± 0.9 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 1.4 | 8.8 ± 0.5 | 6.2 ± 1.5 |
| CT | 87.6 ± 54.2 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 8.9 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 1.6 | |
| CC | 87.9 ± 58.6 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 8.9 ± 0.7 | 6.4 ± 1.8 | |
| P-value | 0.3634 | 0.1639 | 0.4293 | 0.9179 | 0.3790 | 0.3218 | 0.6075 | |
| Padj-value | 0.3362 | 0.1625 | 0.3798 | 0.9100 | 0.3558 | 0.3217 | 0.5633 | |
| CASRrs7627468 | GG | 95.1 ± 62.9 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 8.9 ± 0.7 | 6.4 ± 1.7 |
| AG | 90.0 ± 58.1 | 6.1 ± 0.7 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 8.9 ± 0.6 | 6.4 ± 1.6 | |
| AA | 79.0 ± 49.0 | 6.1 ± 0.7 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 9.0 ± 0.7 | 6.5 ± 1.9 | |
| P-value | 0.0921 | 0.0090 | 0.8526 | 0.8115 | 0.5804 | 0.4067 | 0.8801 | |
| Padj-value | 0.0739 | 0.0088 | 0.8319 | 0.7946 | 0.5616 | 0.4069 | 0.8633 | |
| RGS14rs12654812 | AA | 76.5 ± 44.2 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 1.4 | 9.0 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 2.1 |
| AG | 90.1 ± 58.0 | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 8.9 ± 0.6 | 6.3 ± 1.7 | |
| GG | 86.8 ± 57.2 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 8.9 ± 0.7 | 6.5 ± 1.7 | |
| P-value | 0.4383 | 0.3600 | 0.0764 | 0.9605 | 0.1729 | 0.6411 | 0.7895 | |
| Padj-value | 0.4109 | 0.3582 | 0.0532 | 0.9568 | 0.1556 | 0.6410 | 0.7623 |
aUrinary calcium-to-creatinine ratio (UCa/UCr). bUrinary uric acid-to-creatinine ratio (UUA/UCr). P values which remain significant after performing Bonferroni correction (p ≤ 0.016) are shown in bold. The Padj value was adjusted for gender and age.
Table 6.
Association analysis between SNPs and subgroups of biochemical data in patients with kidney stone.
| Serum uric acid (%) | Serum calcium (%) | Serum creatinine (%) | UCa/UCra (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | >7.2 (mg/dl) | ≤7.2 (mg/dl) | >10.2 (mg/dl) | ≤10.2 (mg/dl) | >1.3 (mg/dl) | ≤1.3 (mg/dl) | ≥0.2 | <0.2 | |
| ALPLrs1256328 | TT | 5 (4.2) | 20 (7.3) | 1 (11.1) | 24 (6.4) | 7 (8.6) | 20 (6.2) | 8 (9.4) | 14 (5.1) |
| CT | 36 (30.5) | 71 (25.9) | 1 (11.1) | 104 (27.7) | 19 (23.5) | 87 (27.0) | 22 (25.9) | 78 (28.4) | |
| CC | 77 (65.3) | 183 (66.8) | 7 (77.8) | 247 (65.9) | 55 (67.9) | 215 (66.8) | 55 (64.7) | 183 (66.5) | |
| p value | 0.9030 | 0.7097 | 0.8432 | 0.4967 | |||||
| OR (95% CI) | 0.98 (0.67–1.42) | 0.80 (0.25–2.59) | 1.04 (0.69–1.58) | 1.16 (0.76–1.75) | |||||
| CASRrs7627468 | GG | 32 (27.6) | 59 (22.3) | 2 (22.2) | 83 (22.7) | 17 (21.8) | 75 (23.9) | 12 (14.3) | 70 (26.0) |
| AG | 46 (39.7) | 118 (44.5) | 2 (22.2) | 160 (43.9) | 32 (41.0) | 135 (43.0) | 39 (46.4) | 114 (42.4) | |
| AA | 38 (32.7) | 88 (33.2) | 5 (55.6) | 122 (33.4) | 29 (37.2) | 104 (33.1) | 33 (39.3) | 85 (31.6) | |
| p value | 0.3227 | 0.2938 | 0.4194 | 0.0170 | |||||
| OR (95% CI) | 1.16 (0.86–1.57) | 0.59 (0.23–1.57) | 0.87 (0.62–1.22) | 0.64 (0.44–0.92) | |||||
| RGS14rs12654812 | AA | 12 (10.1) | 25 (9.2) | 1 (11.1) | 36 (9.6) | 8 (9.9) | 29 (9.0) | 10 (11.9) | 21 (7.6) |
| AG | 44 (37.0) | 100 (36.8) | 3 (33.3) | 138 (36.9) | 26 (32.1) | 122 (38.0) | 32 (38.1) | 99 (36.0) | |
| GG | 63 (52.9) | 147 (54.0) | 5 (55.6) | 200 (53.5) | 47 (58.0) | 170 (53.0) | 42 (50.0) | 155 (56.4) | |
| p value | 0.7531 | 0.9895 | 0.7691 | 0.1854 | |||||
| OR (95% CI) | 1.06 (0.76–1.48) | 1.01 (0.37–2.77) | 0.94 (0.64–1.39) | 1.30 (0.88–1.91) | |||||
The p value corresponding to the likelihood ratio test was obtained from a comparison with the null model and adjusted by gender and age.
aUrinary calcium-to-creatinine ratio (UCa/UCr). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. P values which remain significant after performing Bonferroni correction (p ≤ 0.016) are shown in bold.
Lack of associations of genetic polymorphisms with the eGFR
According to previous studies, renal stones may cause renal impairment and decrease renal function. Therefore, we further calculated eGFRs based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) methods, widely used tools to predict renal function of nephrolithiasis patients. We tested the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and renal function. Among the SNPs we tested, no SNP was significantly associated with values of renal function calculated by either the MDRD or CG method (Supplementary Table S3).
Effects of SNPs on gene expressions in different tissues
From data of the GTEx portal, we found that rs7627468 could influence the expression of the IQCB1 (IQ motif containing B1) gene in the thyroid (p = 2.2 × 10−7) and the EAF2 (ELL-associated factor 2) gene in the esophagus-mucosa (p = 4.1 × 10−5) (Table 7). We also found that rs12654812 has a cis-eQTL effect on RGS14 (regulator of G-protein signaling 14) itself and is very likely to influence expressions of MXD3 (MAX dimerization protein 3) in a variety of tissues. A significantly associated eQTL for rs12654812 was also identified for FGFR4 (encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor 4) in the tibial nerve and F12 (encoding coagulation factor XII) in esophagus mucosa. However, no significant eQTLs were found for rs1256328.
Table 7.
Expression Quantitative Trail Loci (eQTL) results from Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx).
| SNP ID | Gencode ID (ENSG00000-) | Gene Symbol | p value | Effect Size | Tissue | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASR rs7627468 | 173226.12 | IQCB1 | 2.20E-07 | −0.30 | Thyroid | AA > AG > GG |
| 145088.4 | EAF2 | 4.10E-05 | −0.20 | Esophagus-mucosa | AA > AG > GG | |
| RGS14 rs12654812 | 169220.13 | RGS14 | 1.60E-44 | −0.81 | Cells-Transformed fibroblasts | GG > AG > AA |
| 169220.13 | RGS14 | 2.50E-16 | −0.71 | Pituitary | GG > AG > AA | |
| 169220.13 | RGS14 | 3.10E-16 | −0.26 | Thyroid | GG > AG > AA | |
| 169220.13 | RGS14 | 1.60E-33 | −0.66 | Artery-aorta | GG > AG > AA | |
| 169220.13 | RGS14 | 4.60E-14 | −0.49 | Adrenal gland | GG > AG > AA | |
| 169220.13 | RGS14 | 1.70E-10 | −0.58 | Brain-cerebellum | GG > AG > AA | |
| 213347.6 | MXD3 | 1.0E-05 | −0.22 | Artery-aorta | GG > AG > AA | |
| 213347.6 | MXD3 | 2.40E-07 | −0.18 | Skin-sun exposed (lower leg) | GG > AG > AA | |
| 213347.6 | MXD3 | 9.60E-07 | −0.20 | Adipose-subcutaneous | GG > AG > AA | |
| 160867.10 | FGFR4 | 1.30E-11 | −0.44 | Nerve-tibial | GG > AG > AA |
Discussion
In this study, we showed that the TT genotype of rs1256328 in ALPL associated with higher susceptibility of nephrolithiasis in a Taiwanese population, which is consistent with a previous study in Icelandic population25. ALPL encodes tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP), which is essential for the normal development of bones and teeth. TNSALP hydrolyses phosphate substrates such as pyrophosphate (PPi) and phosphorylated glycoproteins like osteopontin, and releases inorganic phosphate, thereby promoting appropriate calcification26. Animal study reported decreased bone mineralization in ALPL-knockout mice due to lower activity of phosphatase27. Furthermore, ALPL gene mutations were found in patients with hypophosphatasia, characterized by elevated urinary PPi excretion28. PPi was reported as a potent inhibitor of hydroxyapatite crystallization, which binds to the surface of basic calcium phosphate crystals and blocks subsequent crystal growth29–31. TNSALP is expressed in proximal tubules of the kidneys28 and frees phosphate through PPi hydrolysis26, which may further lead to kidney stone formation. Moreover, a previous study indicated associations of kidney stone diseases with other genes involved in phosphate regulation, including VDR, klotho (KL), and sodium-hydrogen antiporter 3 regulator 1 (NHERF1)12,32–35, although rs1256328 (ALPL) had no significant eQTL effects on these genes. Since GTEx portal only collects limited cell types, and much evidence has suggested an important role of ALPL in the pathophysiology of nephrolithiasis via phosphate regulatory pathways. Therefore, further studies are required to elucidate the physiological effects of rs1256328 in human nephrolithiasis.
We observed that the AA genotype of rs12654812 in RGS14 was significantly associated with nephrolithiasis susceptibility in a Taiwanese population, which is also consistent with a previous study on an Icelandic population25. Association of rs12654812 with nephrolithiasis was validated in a Japanese population36. However, studies in Chinese population were not totally consistence with each other37,38. RGS14 encodes a member of the regulators of G-protein. Previous study on knockout mice indicated that RGS14 may regulate Ca2+ and affect downstream signals in neurons39. Similar cis-eQTL effects of rs12654812 on RGS14 expression were observed in nervous tissue in our study. However, this effect was not observed in kidney tissue. Since sample size of kidney tissue is limited by the current release of GTex, further studies are required to investigate the effects of rs12654812 on RGS14 expression in kidney tissue. Finally, we identified a significant eQTL in the tibial nerve for rs12654812 with FGFR4 (Table 7), which was reported to be involved in renal phosphate homeostasis40. Consistent with previous studies, FGFR4 signaling is critical for the development of Calcium Nephrolithiasis.
RGS14 protein may restrict Ca2+ elevations40. The malfunctions of TNSALP, the encoding protein of ALPL, involve in the elevated urinary PPi excretion28. While AA genotype on rs12654812 leads to decreased expression of RGS14, Ca2+ level may subsequently increase. This concept is in consistent with the trend observed in our study (Table 5). It’s very likely that dysfunction of either ALPL or RGS14 influence the homeostasis of calcium and phosphate that increase the risk to nephrolithiasis. Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate whether rs1256328 (ALPL) and rs12654812 (RGS14) have synergic effects in the susceptibility of nephrolithiasis. Although we did not observe an association of rs7627468 in CASR with the susceptibility to nephrolithiasis, we found the rs7627468 correlate with the pH value and calcium/creatinine ratio of urine. CASR is a G-protein-coupled receptor located on plasma membranes. It senses and sets extracellular calcium ion levels by controlling renal calcium excretion and regulating parathyroid hormone secretion, thereby maintaining homeostasis of cellular calcium41,42. Moreover, several studies reported associations of CASR variations with nephrolithiasis or other kidney-related clinical manifestations. For example, two association studies on Italian populations indicated that the Arg990Gly (rs1042636) variant on CASR predisposes patients to primary hypercalciuria and nephrolithiasis43,44. Furthermore, Ala986Ser in exon 7 of CASR was repeatedly reported to be associated with a risk of kidney stones and serum calcium concentrations in different ancestries45–47. Our previous study also showed a significant association between CASR (rs17251221) and stone multiplicity in nephrolithiasis patients13. In addition, urinary acidification and urinary volume are two important factors associated with kidney stones48. For example, TRPV5−/−knockout mice demonstrated robust hypercalciuria and hyperphosphaturia without calcium-phosphate stone precipitation49. In the same study, researchers discovered that activation of the renal CASR can promote H+ excretion and downregulate aquaporin 2 leading to urinary acidification and polyuria49. These beneficial adaptations promoted the excretion of large amounts of soluble calcium, which was crucial to preventing the formation of kidney stones. This evidence indicates that CASR may be involved in kidney stone formation not only via controlling the calcium concentration, but also via regulating the urine pH. Furthermore, rs7627468 was associated with IQCB1 expression in the thyroid, which encodes the nephrocystin protein that interacts with calmodulin50. rs7627468 was associated with EAF2 expression in the esophageal mucosa. However, the physiological functions of EAF2 in renal tissues are still unclear.
There are some limitations in this study. Data of the controls from the Taiwan Biobank were accessed through the Taiwan View website, which provides only summarized genotype counts, but not genotypes of individual subjects. For nephrolithiasis patients, important confounding factors, such as lifestyle, disease duration, and drug treatment, were unavailable, and we were therefore unable to adjust for the data. Furthermore, the modest sample size of nephrolithiasis patients collected in this study might have reduced the power of the statistical testing. Finally, although we observed eQTL effects of rs7627468 and rs12654812 in silico, further experiments are required to validate the effects of the SNPs on other genes and to elucidate the detailed subsequent mechanisms of the development of nephrolithiasis.
In summary, this study successfully replicated an association of SNPs in ALPL and RGS14, rs1256328 and rs12654812, with susceptibility to nephrolithiasis in a Taiwanese population. Our study further indicated that rs7627468 in CASR was associated with pH values and the calcium/creatinine ratio in urine of nephrolithiasis patients.
Methods
Longitudinal health insurance data from national health insurance research database
To investigate the prevalence of nephrolithiasis in Taiwan, we extracted calcium nephrolithiasis patients from the subset database (Longitudinal Health Insurance Database, LHID) of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) using ICD-9-CM code 592.X. LHID database consists of medical claims data for 1,000,000 subjects randomly selected from the entire NHIRD (n = 23.5 million).
Patient recruitment
Patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for nephrolithiasis were recruited at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH). Our study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the design of the study and final report were performed with approval of the institutional review board of KMUH. We received informed consent from all subjects before any data were collected. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of renal tubular acidosis, renal failure, gout, primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism, chronic diarrhea, or cancer. In total, 454 calcium nephrolithiasis patients were diagnosed by a qualified urologist and were recruited. Each patient’s echographic and radiographic examinations of renal stones were retrieved along with clinical laboratory data, such as gender, age, and family history of nephrolithiasis. Blood and urine samples were collected at a random time point to measure total calcium, uric acid, and creatinine levels. All urinary parameters were corrected using urinary creatinine levels. Renal stone samples were obtained by either surgical intervention or spontaneous stone passage. Moreover, for the stone number analysis, patients with stone numbers exceeding one were allocated to the multiple-stone group, while patients with a single stone were grouped together. Patients without clear evidence for classifying them into either the multiple-stone or single-stone group were excluded from the stone number analysis.
The past medical history of the stone episode was retrospectively traced back as far as the patient’s medical record was available. Patients with only one episode were placed in the non-recurrent group; those with two or more symptomatic episodes within 6 months were allocated to the recurrent group. Since the medical history was retrospectively retrieved, patients without clear evidence for classifying them into either the single or recurrent group were excluded from the recurrence analysis.
Genotypes of general population from Taiwan biobank
Taiwan Biobank is a prospective cohort of Taiwanese general population, in which cancer patients and subjects with nationalities other than Taiwan were excluded51. Among them, blood samples from 1517 subjects were sequenced. Four subjects exited the project afterwards, with 1513 subjects remaining. In this current study, SNPs frequencies for these 1513 subjects were obtained through the Taiwan View website (https://taiwanview.twbiobank.org.tw/index) as genotypic references of general population.
DNA extraction
Peripheral venous blood was collected from patients and processed the same day. Blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to separate serum and cells. The buffy coat containing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was extracted and washed with red blood cell (RBC) lysis. Samples were mixed with a cell lysis buffer for several days after lysing the RBCs in lysis buffer. Proteins were precipitated using a protein precipitation solution. Finally, 95% isopropanol and 80% alcohol were used to isolate total genomic DNA.
Candidate SNPs and genotyping
The SNPs investigated in this study were selected from a paper by Oddsson et al.25. Based on a GWAS, Oddsson et al. reported four SNPs associated with kidney stones in a European population. Among these SNPs, rs199565725 (CLDN14) was excluded from the study, because no frequency data were found in a search of the Taiwan View website. Furthermore, the minor allele frequency of this SNP and any other SNPs in high linkage (r2 ≧ 0.8) to rs199565725 are of low frequency (<0.05) in Asian population and Taiwanese population, according to HaploReg v4.1 and Taiwan Biobank, respectively. Therefore, three SNPs were analyzed in this study (Table 2). Genotyping was performed using the TaqMan Allelic Discrimination Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) used a 96-well microplate with an ABI9700 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). After the PCR, fluorescence was measured and analyzed using System SDS software vers. 1.2.3 (Applied Biosystems).
Statistical analysis
Statistical differences between patients and controls, multiple- and single-stone episodes, and between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups in genotype and allele frequencies were analyzed by a Chi-squared (χ2) test. Quantitative variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). A t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means of continuous variables (clinical biochemical data and the eGFR) among different genotypes in nephrolithiasis patients. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was applied to adjust for age and gender. The likelihood ratio test was used to analyze the association between biochemical data and each genotype, and each p value was adjusted for age and gender. Multiple testing was adjusted for SNP numbers using the Bonferroni correction. A significance level of 0.016 (0.05/3) was used. All statistical analyses were implemented using SAS 9.3 statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) for Windows. Regarding to Expression Quantitative Trait Locus (eQTL) analysis, we accessed the GTEx portal to investigate the effects of the SNPs on gene expressions in different tissues52.
Supplementary information
Author contributions
W.C. Chen, Y.H. Chou, and W.C. Chang conceived the study design. W.C. Chen performed the genotyping experiments. W.C. Chen and W.H. Chou performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscripts. W.H. Chou, W.P. Chang, H.W.Chu and W.C. Chang edited and revised the manuscript. H.W. Chu reviewed the manuscript and provided basic characteristics of subjects from the Taiwan Biobank. C.C. Huang, X. Liu reviewed the manuscript and helped intepretation of the data. W.P. Chang analyzed the NHIRD data, and helped in the manuscript revision and data interpretation. W.P. Chang, Y.H. Chou and W.C. Chang reviewed the manuscript and jointly supervised the work as equal correspondence authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed in the study are available in the main text.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Wei-Chiao Chen and Wan-Hsuan Chou.
Contributor Information
Wei-Pin Chang, Email: wpchang@tmu.edu.tw.
Yii-Her Chou, Email: yihech@gap.kmu.edu.tw.
Wei-Chiao Chang, Email: wcc@tmu.edu.tw.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-53261-8.
References
- 1.Pak CY. Kidney stones. Lancet. 1998;351:1797–1801. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01295-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–199411.See Editorial by Goldfarb, p. 1951. Kidney International. 2003;63:1817–1823. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States. European Urology. 2012;62:160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sorokin I, et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J. Urol. 2017;35:1301–1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Glowacki LS, Beecroft ML, Cook RJ, Pahl D, Churchill DN. The natural history of asymptomatic urolithiasis. J Urol. 1992;147:319–321. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37225-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gary C Curhan, M., ScDMark D Aronson, MDGlenn M Preminger, MD. (ed. MDSusanna I Lee Albert Q Lam, MD, PhD).
- 7.Trinchieri A, et al. A prospective study of recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after a first renal stone. J Urol. 1999;162:27–30. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sutherland JW, Parks JH, Coe FL. Recurrence after a single renal stone in a community practice. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1985;11:267–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldfarb DS, Fischer ME, Keich Y, Goldberg J. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1053–1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Monico CG, Milliner DS. Genetic determinants of urolithiasis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;8:151–162. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jackman SV, et al. Familial calcium stone disease: TaqI polymorphism and the vitamin D receptor. J Endourol. 1999;13:313–316. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Basiri A, et al. Coding region analysis of vitamin D receptor gene and its association with active calcium stone disease. Urol Res. 2012;40:35–40. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0399-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chou YH, et al. A genetic polymorphism (rs17251221) in the calcium-sensing receptor gene (CASR) is associated with stone multiplicity in calcium nephrolithiasis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vezzoli G, et al. Decreased transcriptional activity of calcium-sensing receptor gene promoter 1 is associated with calcium nephrolithiasis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:3839–3847. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gao B, et al. A polymorphism of the osteopontin gene is related to urinary calcium stones. J Urol. 2005;174:1472–1476. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173012.28341.c3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu CC, et al. The impact of osteopontin promoter polymorphisms on the risk of calcium urolithiasis. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:739–743. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vezzoli G, Terranegra A, Arcidiacono T, Soldati L. Genetics and calcium nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2011;80:587–593. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Groot T, Bindels RJ, Hoenderop JG. TRPV5: an ingeniously controlled calcium channel. Kidney Int. 2008;74:1241–1246. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khaleel A, et al. A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (rs4236480) in TRPV5 Calcium Channel Gene Is Associated with Stone Multiplicity in Calcium Nephrolithiasis Patients. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:375427. doi: 10.1155/2015/375427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chou YH, et al. A polymorphism of the ORAI1 gene is associated with the risk and recurrence of calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2011;185:1742–1746. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kan WC, et al. Study of the association between ITPKC genetic polymorphisms and calcium nephrolithiasis. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:397826. doi: 10.1155/2014/397826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thorleifsson G, et al. Sequence variants in the CLDN14 gene associate with kidney stones and bone mineral density. Nat Genet. 2009;41:926–930. doi: 10.1038/ng.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Urabe Y, et al. A genome-wide association study of nephrolithiasis in the Japanese population identifies novel susceptible Loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3, and 13q14.1. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yasui T, et al. A replication study for three nephrolithiasis loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3 and 13q14.1 in the Japanese population. J Hum Genet. 2013;58:588–593. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oddsson A, et al. Common and rare variants associated with kidney stones and biochemical traits. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7975. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moochhala SH, Sayer JA, Carr G, Simmons NL. Renal calcium stones: insights from the control of bone mineralization. Exp Physiol. 2008;93:43–49. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.040790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harmey D, et al. Concerted regulation of inorganic pyrophosphate and osteopontin by akp2, enpp1, and ank: an integrated model of the pathogenesis of mineralization disorders. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:1199–1209. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63208-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Whyte MP. Hypophosphatasia and the role of alkaline phosphatase in skeletal mineralization. Endocr Rev. 1994;15:439–461. doi: 10.1210/edrv-15-4-439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fleisch H, Bisaz S. Isolation from urine of pyrophosphate, a calcification inhibitor. The American journal of physiology. 1962;203:671–675. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.203.4.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Russell RG. Metabolism of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) Arthritis and rheumatism. 1976;19(Suppl 3):465–478. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(197605/06)19:3+<465::AID-ART1780190722>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jung A, Bisaz S, Fleisch H. The binding of pyrophosphate and two diphosphonates by hydroxyapatite crystals. Calcified tissue research. 1973;11:269–280. doi: 10.1007/BF02547227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou TB, Jiang ZP, Li AH, Ju L. Association of vitamin D receptor BsmI (rs1544410), Fok1 (rs2228570), TaqI (rs731236) and ApaI (rs7975232) gene polymorphism with the nephrolithiasis susceptibility. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2015;35:107–114. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2014.936459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Telci D, et al. KLOTHO gene polymorphism of G395A is associated with kidney stones. Am J Nephrol. 2011;33:337–343. doi: 10.1159/000325505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu C, et al. Klotho gene polymorphism of rs3752472 is associated with the risk of urinary calculi in the population of Han nationality in Eastern China. Gene. 2013;526:494–497. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Karim Z, et al. NHERF1 mutations and responsiveness of renal parathyroid hormone. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1128–1135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yasui T, et al. A replication study for three nephrolithiasis loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3 and 13q14.1 in the Japanese population. J. Hum. Genet. 2013;58:588. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Long Jun, Chen Yang, Lin Haisong, Liao Ming, Li Tianyu, Tong Lei, Wei Suchun, Xian Xiaoying, Zhu Jia, Chen Jianxin, Tian Jiarong, Wang Qiuyan, Mo Zengnan. Significant association between RGS14 rs12654812 and nephrolithiasis risk among Guangxi population in China. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2018;32(6):e22435. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang L, et al. Association Study of Reported Significant Loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3, 13q14.1 and 16p12.3 with Urolithiasis in Chinese Han Ethnicity. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45766. doi: 10.1038/srep45766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Evans Paul R., Parra-Bueno Paula, Smirnov Michael S., Lustberg Daniel J., Dudek Serena M., Hepler John R., Yasuda Ryohei. RGS14 Restricts Plasticity in Hippocampal CA2 by Limiting Postsynaptic Calcium Signaling. eneuro. 2018;5(3):ENEURO.0353-17.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0353-17.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gattineni J, et al. Regulation of renal phosphate transport by FGF23 is mediated by FGFR1 and FGFR4. American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology. 2014;306:F351–F358. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00232.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brown EM, et al. Calcium-ion-sensing cell-surface receptors. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:234–240. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199507273330407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.D’Souza-Li L. The calcium-sensing receptor and related diseases. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006;50:628–639. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302006000400008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Corbetta S, et al. R990G polymorphism of the calcium-sensing receptor and renal calcium excretion in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155:687–692. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vezzoli G, et al. R990G polymorphism of calcium-sensing receptor does produce a gain-of-function and predispose to primary hypercalciuria. Kidney Int. 2007;71:1155–1162. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shakhssalim N, et al. Association between calcium-sensing receptor gene polymorphisms and recurrent calcium kidney stone disease: a comprehensive gene analysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010;44:406–412. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.497770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.O’Seaghdha CM, et al. Common variants in the calcium-sensing receptor gene are associated with total serum calcium levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:4296–4303. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kapur K, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis for serum calcium identifies significantly associated SNPs near the calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) gene. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wagner CA, Mohebbi N. Urinary pH and stone formation. J Nephrol. 2010;23(Suppl 16):S165–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Renkema KY, et al. The calcium-sensing receptor promotes urinary acidification to prevent nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1705–1713. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008111195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Otto EA, et al. Nephrocystin-5, a ciliary IQ domain protein, is mutated in Senior-Loken syndrome and interacts with RPGR and calmodulin. Nat Genet. 2005;37:282–288. doi: 10.1038/ng1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fan CT, Lin JC, Lee CH. Taiwan Biobank: a project aiming to aid Taiwan’s transition into a biomedical island. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9:235–246. doi: 10.2217/14622416.9.2.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lonsdale John, Thomas Jeffrey, Salvatore Mike, Phillips Rebecca, Lo Edmund, Shad Saboor, Hasz Richard, Walters Gary, Garcia Fernando, Young Nancy, Foster Barbara, Moser Mike, Karasik Ellen, Gillard Bryan, Ramsey Kimberley, Sullivan Susan, Bridge Jason, Magazine Harold, Syron John, Fleming Johnelle, Siminoff Laura, Traino Heather, Mosavel Maghboeba, Barker Laura, Jewell Scott, Rohrer Dan, Maxim Dan, Filkins Dana, Harbach Philip, Cortadillo Eddie, Berghuis Bree, Turner Lisa, Hudson Eric, Feenstra Kristin, Sobin Leslie, Robb James, Branton Phillip, Korzeniewski Greg, Shive Charles, Tabor David, Qi Liqun, Groch Kevin, Nampally Sreenath, Buia Steve, Zimmerman Angela, Smith Anna, Burges Robin, Robinson Karna, Valentino Kim, Bradbury Deborah, Cosentino Mark, Diaz-Mayoral Norma, Kennedy Mary, Engel Theresa, Williams Penelope, Erickson Kenyon, Ardlie Kristin, Winckler Wendy, Getz Gad, DeLuca David, MacArthur Daniel, Kellis Manolis, Thomson Alexander, Young Taylor, Gelfand Ellen, Donovan Molly, Meng Yan, Grant George, Mash Deborah, Marcus Yvonne, Basile Margaret, Liu Jun, Zhu Jun, Tu Zhidong, Cox Nancy J, Nicolae Dan L, Gamazon Eric R, Im Hae Kyung, Konkashbaev Anuar, Pritchard Jonathan, Stevens Matthew, Flutre Timothèe, Wen Xiaoquan, Dermitzakis Emmanouil T, Lappalainen Tuuli, Guigo Roderic, Monlong Jean, Sammeth Michael, Koller Daphne, Battle Alexis, Mostafavi Sara, McCarthy Mark, Rivas Manual, Maller Julian, Rusyn Ivan, Nobel Andrew, Wright Fred, Shabalin Andrey, Feolo Mike, Sharopova Nataliya, Sturcke Anne, Paschal Justin, Anderson James M, Wilder Elizabeth L, Derr Leslie K, Green Eric D, Struewing Jeffery P, Temple Gary, Volpi Simona, Boyer Joy T, Thomson Elizabeth J, Guyer Mark S, Ng Cathy, Abdallah Assya, Colantuoni Deborah, Insel Thomas R, Koester Susan E, Little A Roger, Bender Patrick K, Lehner Thomas, Yao Yin, Compton Carolyn C, Vaught Jimmie B, Sawyer Sherilyn, Lockhart Nicole C, Demchok Joanne, Moore Helen F. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nature Genetics. 2013;45(6):580–585. doi: 10.1038/ng.2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed in the study are available in the main text.