Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Human Brain Mapping logoLink to Human Brain Mapping
. 1998 Dec 29;7(1):49–66. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:1<49::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-J

Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography

Marty G Woldorff 1,3,✉, Claus Tempelmann 1,2, Juergen Fell 2, Carola Tegeler 1, Birgit Gaschler‐Markefski 1, Hermann Hinrichs 2, Hans‐Jochen Heinze 2, Henning Scheich 1
PMCID: PMC6873307  PMID: 9882090

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) were used to study the relationships between lateralized auditory perception in humans and the contralaterality of processing in auditory cortex. Subjects listened to rapidly presented streams of short FM‐sweep tone bursts to detect infrequent, slightly deviant tone bursts. The stimulus streams consisted of either monaural stimuli to one ear or the other or binaural stimuli with brief interaural onset delays. The onset delay gives the binaural sounds a lateralized auditory perception and is thought to be a key component of how our brains localize sounds in space. For the monaural stimuli, fMRI revealed a clear contralaterality in auditory cortex, with a contralaterality index (contralateral activity divided by the sum of contralateral and ipsilateral activity) of 67%. In contrast, the fMRI activations from the laterally perceived binaural stimuli indicated little or no contralaterality (index of 51%). The MEG recordings from the same subjects performing the same task converged qualitatively with the fMRI data, confirming a clear monaural contralaterality, with no contralaterality for the laterally perceived binaurals. However, the MEG monaural contralaterality (55%) was less than the fMRI and decreased across the several hundred millisecond poststimulus time period, going from 57% in the M50 latency range (20–70 ms) to 53% in the M200 range (170–250 ms). These data sets provide both quantification of the degree of contralaterality in the auditory pathways and insight into the locus and mechanism of the lateralized perception of spatially lateralized sounds. Hum. Brain Mapping 7:49–66, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: auditory cortex, contralateral, perception, fMRI, MEG, auditory space, interaural time delay

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (823.2 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. Binder JR, Rao SM, Hammeke TA, Frost JA, Bandetinni PA, Hyde JS. 1994. Effects of stimulus rate on signal response during functional magnetic resonance imaging of auditory cortex. Cogn Brain Res 2:31–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blauert J. 1997. Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brodal A. 1981. Neurological Anatomy. New York: Oxford University Press, p 602–639. [Google Scholar]
  4. Celesia GG. 1976. Organization of auditory cortical areas in man. Brain 99:403–414. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=77066344&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarey JC, Barone P, Imig TJ. 1992. Physiology of thalamus and cortex In: Popper AN, Fay RR, eds. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology, New York: Springer, p 232–334. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamalainen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV, 1993. Magnetoencephalography: Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65:413–497. [Google Scholar]
  7. Irvine DRF. 1992. Physiology of the auditory brainstem In: Popper AN, Fay RR, eds. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology New York: Springer; p 153–231. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkins WM, Masterton RB. 1982. Sound localization: Effects of unilateral lesions in central auditory system. J Neurophysiol 47:987–1016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=82268061&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. King AJ, Carlisle S. 1995. Neural coding for auditory space In: Gazzaniga M, ed. The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; p 665–681. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lauter JL, Herschovitch P, Formby P, Raichle ME. 1985. Tonotopic organization in the human auditory cortex revealed by positron emission tomography. Hear Res 20:199–205. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=86111349&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Makela JP, Ahonen A, Hamalainen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi R, Kajola M, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV, McEvoy L, Salmelin R, Salonen O, Sams M, Simola J, Tesche C, Vasam JP. 1993. Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole‐head neuromagnetic recordings. Hum Brain Mapp 1:48–56. [Google Scholar]
  12. Marquardt DW. 1963. An algorithm for least‐squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11:431–441. [Google Scholar]
  13. McCevoy L, Hari R, Imada T, Sams M. 1993. Human auditory cortical mechanisms of sound lateralization. II. Interaural time differences at sound onset. Hear Res 67:98–109. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=93339994&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCevoy L, Makela JP, Hamalainen M, Hari R. 1994. Effect of interaural time differences on middle‐latency and late auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hear Res 78:249–257. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=95073891&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moore B, ed. 1994. Hearing (Handbook of Perception & Cognition). New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Naatanen R, Picton T 1987: The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375–425. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=87290366&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pantev C, Lutkenhoner B, Hoke M, Lehnertz K. 1986. Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory‐evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural tone burst stimulation. Audiology 25:54–61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=86158517&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pickles JO. 1981. An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing. New York: Academic Press, p 195–227. [Google Scholar]
  19. Robinson SE. 1989. Environmental noise cancellation for biomagnetic measurements In: Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M, eds. Advances in Biomagnetism. New York: Plenum Press; p 721–724. [Google Scholar]
  20. Talairach J, Tournoux P. 1988. Co‐Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme. [Google Scholar]
  21. Winer JA. 1992. The functional architecture of the medial geniculate body and the primary auditory cortex In: Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR, eds. The Mammalian Auditory Pathways: Neuroanatomy. New York: Springer; p 222–409. [Google Scholar]
  22. Woldorff MG. 1993. Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiology 30:98–119. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=94022790&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zatorre RJ, Evans AC, Meyer E. 1994. Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch. J Neurosci 14:1908–1919. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=94210030&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES