Skip to main content
PMC home page
Human Brain Mapping logoLink to Human Brain Mapping
. 1999 Feb 1;7(2):79–88. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:2<79::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO;2-R

Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise

Thomas M Talavage 1,2,✉, Whitney B Edmister 1,3,4, Patrick J Ledden 1, Robert M Weisskoff 1
PMCID: PMC6873322  PMID: 9950065

Abstract

A clustered volume acquisition functional MRI pulse sequence was modified to assess the response to the acoustic noise of echo‐planar imaging in the auditory cortex and to determine whether it is possible to obtain data which is relatively free of acoustic contamination. The spatial location and strength (percent signal change) of cortical responses to the imager noise were examined by introducing extra gradient readouts, without slice excitation, to provide acoustic stimulation immediately prior to acquisition of a cerebral volume. The duration of acoustic stimulation was controlled by varying the number of extra gradient readouts. Slice acquisitions were clustered at the end of the repetition time (TR) period to prevent a response from being induced by the volume acquisition itself (“Intra‐Acquisition Response”). The cerebral volumes were acquired using a long TR in order to limit the integration of the cortical response across volume acquisitions (“Inter‐Acquisition Response”). Cortical responses were observed to be largest and most significant on the medial two‐thirds of Heschl's gyrus, the location of primary auditory cortex. Mean signal changes induced by the imager noise were observed to be as high as 0.95%. A 2 sec delay prior to onset of the BOLD response was empirically determined. These results demonstrate that clustered volume acquisitions may be utilized for up to 2 sec of volume acquisition without inducing an appreciable Intra‐Acquisition Response and can be used, with a sufficiently long TR, to provide data which are similarly free of any Inter‐Acquisition Response. Hum. Brain Mapping 7:79–88, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: fMRI, pulse sequence, brain mapping, stimulus masking, response suppression

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.0 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Wong EC, Hyde JS. 1993. Processing strategies for functional MRI of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 30:161–173. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=93375843&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Van Kylen J, Birn RM, Hyde JS. 1998. Functional MRI of imager acoustic noise induced brain activation. Magn Reson Med 39:410–416. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=98158362&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buckner RL, Bandettini PA, O'Craven KM, Savoy RL, Petersen SE, Raichle ME, Rosen BR. 1996. Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:14878–14883. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=97121483&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Counter SA, Olofsson A, Grahn HF, Borg E. 1997. MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:606–611. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=97313651&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edmister WB, Talavage TM, Ledden PJ, Weisskoff RM. 1999. Improved Auditory Cortex Imaging Using Clustered Volume Acquisitions. Hum Brain Map 7:89–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ. 1995. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Map 2:165–189. [Google Scholar]
  7. Galaburda AM, Sanides F. 1980. Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 190:597–610. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=80228264&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, Goldberg IE, Weisskoff RM, Poncelet BP, Kennedy DN, Hoppel BE, Cohen MS, Turner R, Cheng HM, Brady TJ, Rosen BR. 1992. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5675–5679. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=92302304&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ravicz ME, Melcher JR. 1998. Reducing imager‐generated acoustic noise at the ear during functional magnetic resonance imaging: passive attenuation. In: Abstracts of the Twenty‐First Midwinter Research Meeting, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 1998, p 208.
  10. Savoy RL, O'Craven KM, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM. 1994. Enhancing the effective temporal resolution of functional neuroimaging: measuring fMRI responses to very brief (100 msec) visual stimuli using computer synchronized stimulus generation and signal averaging. In: Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance, Second Meeting, San Francisco, 1994, p 667.
  11. Scheich H, Baumgart F, Gaschler B, Tempelmann C, Tegeler C, Stiller D, Heinze HJ. 1997. Masking of acoustic stimuli produces fMRI activation in a particular human auditory cortex field. In: Abstracts of the Twentieth Midwinter Research Meeting, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 1997, p 26.
  12. Shah NJ, Jancke L, Grosse‐Ruyken M‐L, Posse S, Muller‐Gartner H‐W. 1997. How does acoustic masking noise affect fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination? Neuroimage 5(4 part 2):S195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Woodruff PWR, Benson RR, Kwong KK, Howard RJ, Talavage T, Belliveau J, Rosen BR. 1996. Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality‐dependent. Neuroreport 7:1909–1913. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=97061660&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES