Skip to main content
PMC home page
Human Brain Mapping logoLink to Human Brain Mapping
. 1999 Jun 15;7(4):254–266. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:4<254::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-G

Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions

John Ashburner 1,✉, Karl J Friston 1
PMCID: PMC6873340  PMID: 10408769

Abstract

We describe a comprehensive framework for performing rapid and automatic nonlabel‐based nonlinear spatial normalizations. The approach adopted minimizes the residual squared difference between an image and a template of the same modality. In order to reduce the number of parameters to be fitted, the nonlinear warps are described by a linear combination of low spatial frequency basis functions. The objective is to determine the optimum coefficients for each of the bases by minimizing the sum of squared differences between the image and template, while simultaneously maximizing the smoothness of the transformation using a maximum a posteriori (MAP) approach. Most MAP approaches assume that the variance associated with each voxel is already known and that there is no covariance between neighboring voxels. The approach described here attempts to estimate this variance from the data, and also corrects for the correlations between neighboring voxels. This makes the same approach suitable for the spatial normalization of both high‐quality magnetic resonance images, and low‐resolution noisy positron emission tomography images. A fast algorithm has been developed that utilizes Taylor's theorem and the separable nature of the basis functions, meaning that most of the nonlinear spatial variability between images can be automatically corrected within a few minutes. Hum. Brain Mapping 7:254–266, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: registration, anatomy, imaging, stereotaxy, basis functions, spatial normalization, PET, MRI, functional mapping

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (416.8 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. Amit Y, Grenander U, Piccioni M. 1991. Structural image restoration through deformable templates. J Am Stat Assoc 86:376–387. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 1997. Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning—a unified framework. Neuroimage 6:209–217. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=98008829&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashburner J, Neelin P, Collins DL, Evans AC, Friston KJ. 1997. Incorporating prior knowledge into image registration. Neuroimage 6:344–352. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=98080657&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bookstein FL. 1989. Principal warps: thin‐plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intelligence 11:567–585. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bookstein FL. 1997a. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1:225–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bookstein FL. 1997b. Quadratic variation of deformations In: Duncan J, Gindi G, editors. Information processing in medical imaging. New York: Springer‐Verlag; p 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  7. Christensen GE. 1994. Deformable shape models for anatomy. Doctoral thesis. Sener Institute, Washington University.
  8. Christensen GE, Rabbitt RD, Miller MI. 1994. 3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy. Phys Med Biol 39:609–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen GE, Rabbitt RD, Miller MI. 1996. Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans Image Process 5:1435–1447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Collignon A, Maes F, Delaere D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G. 1995. Automated multi‐modality image registration based on information theory In: Bizais Y, Barillot C, Di Paola, editors, . Information processing in medical imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p 263–274. [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins DL, Peters TM, Evans AC. 1994a. An automated 3D non‐linear image deformation procedure for determination of gross morphometric variability in human brain In: Proc. Conference on Visualisation in Biomedical Computing. p 180–190. [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins DL, Neelin P, Peters TM, Evans AC. 1994b. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:192–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Collins DL, Evans AC, Holmes C, Peters TM. 1995. Automatic 3D segmentation of neuro‐anatomical structures from MRI In: Bizais Y, Barillot C, Di Paola R, editors. Information processing in medical imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p 139–152. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fox PT. 1995. Spatial normalization origins: objectives, applications, and alternatives. Hum Brain Mapp 3:161–164. [Google Scholar]
  15. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline J‐B, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ. 1995. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 2:165–189. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gee JC, Haynor DR, Le Briquer L, Bajcsy RK. 1997. Advances in elastic matching theory and its implementation In: Goos G, Hartmanis J, Van Leeuwen J. CVRMed‐MRCAS'97. New York: Springer‐Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mazziotta JC, Toga AW, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J. 1995. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. Neuroimage 2:89–101. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=98003477&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller MI, Christensen GE, Amit Y, Grenander U. 1993. Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11944–11948. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=94089747&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pelizzari CA, Chen GTY, Spelbring DR, Weichselbaum RR, Chen CT. 1988. Accurate three‐dimensional registration of CT, PET and MR images of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:20–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Studholme C, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. 1995. Multiresolution voxel similarity measures for MR‐PET coregistration In: Bizais Y, Barillot C, Di Paola R, . Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p 287–298. [Google Scholar]
  21. Talairach J, 1988. Coplanar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme Medical. [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson PM, Toga AW. 1996. Visualization and mapping of anatomic abnormalities using a probabilistic brain atlas based on random fluid transformations In: Hohne KH, Kikinis R, editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Visualization in Biomedical Computing. New York: Springer‐Verlag; p 383–392. [Google Scholar]
  23. Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC. 1992. Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:620–633. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=92332823&form=6&db=m&Dopt=r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES