Skip to main content
PMC home page
Human Brain Mapping logoLink to Human Brain Mapping
. 1998 Dec 7;6(4):270–282. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<270::AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-0

The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI

George Bush 1,2,3,✉, Paul J Whalen 2, Bruce R Rosen 1,3, Michael A Jenike 2, Sean C McInerney 2, Scott L Rauch 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC6873370  PMID: 9704265

Abstract

The anterior cingulate cortex has been activated by color Stroop tasks, supporting the hypothesis that it is recruited to mediate response selection or allocate attentional resources when confronted with competing information‐processing streams. The current study used the newly developed “Counting Stroop” to identify the mediating neural substrate of cognitive interference. The Counting Stroop, a Stroop variant allowing on‐line response time measurements while obviating speech, was created because speaking produces head movements that can exceed those tolerated by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), preventing the collection of vital performance data. During this task, subjects report by button‐press the number of words (1–4) on the screen, regardless of word meaning. Interference trials contain number words that are incongruent with the correct response (e.g., “two” written three times), while neutral trials contain single semantic category common animals (e.g., “bird”). Nine normal right‐handed adult volunteers underwent fMRI while performing the Counting Stroop. Group fMRI data revealed significant (P ≤ 10‐4) activity in the cognitive division of anterior cingulate cortex when contrasting the interference vs. neutral conditions. On‐line performance data showed 1) longer reaction times for interference blocks than for neutral ones, and 2) decreasing reaction times with practice during interference trials (diminished interference effects), indicating that learning occurred. The performance data proved to be a useful guide in analyzing the image data. The relative difference in anterior cingulate activity between the interference and neutral conditions decreased as subjects learned the task. These findings have ramifications for attentional, cognitive interference, learning, and motor control mechanism theories. Hum. Brain Mapping 6:270–282, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: Stroop, cognitive interference, attention, functional magnetic resonance imaging, cingulate, learning, habituation, practice, response selection, motor

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (359.0 KB).

References

  1. Abdullaev YG, Posner MI (1997): Time course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations. Psychol Sci 8: 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams JA (1987): Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychol Bull 101: 41–74. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates JF, Goldman‐Rakic PS (1993): Prefrontal connections of medial motor areas in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 336: 211–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bench CJ, Frith CD, Grasby PM, Friston KJ, Paulesu E, Frackowiak RSJ, Dolan RJ (1993): Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia 31: 907–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benes FM (1993): Relationship of cingulate cortex to schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders In: Vogt BA, Gabriel M. (eds): Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus: A Comprehensive Handbook. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp 581–605. [Google Scholar]
  6. Breiter HC, Rauch SL, Kwong KK, Baker JR, Weisskoff RM, Kennedy DN, Kendrick AD, Davis TL, Jiang A, Cohen MSEC, Stern CE, Belliveau JW, Baer L, O'Sullivan RM, Savage CR, Jenike MA, Rosen BR (1996): Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive‐compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53: 595–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buckner RL, Bandettini PA, O'Craven KM, Savoy RL, Petersen SE, Raichle ME, Rosen BR (1996): Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 14878–14883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bush G, Rosen B, Belliveau J, Reppas J, Rauch SL, Kennedy DN, Sutton J, Tootell R (1995): A functional magnetic resonance study of selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, speed and color. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 21 (2): 936. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bush G, Kennedy D, Jiang A, Talavage T (1996): An automated system of localization and characterization of functional MRI activations in four dimensions. NeuroImage 3: 555. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, Rauch SL (1997): The Digital Stroop: A novel interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging–Validation study with functional MRI. Cognitive Neuroscience Soc 4th Annu Meet 4: 128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carter CS, Mintun M, Cohen JD (1995): Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An H2 15O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage 2: 264–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Casey BJ, Trainor RJ, Orendi JL, Schubert AB, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD, Noll DC (1996): A pediatric functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a go‐no‐go task. Neuroimage 3: 593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen JD, Dunbar K, McClelland JL (1990): On the control of automatic processes: Aparallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol Rev 97: 332–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen MSEC, Weisskoff RM (1991): Ultra‐fast imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 9: 1–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Colby CL (1991): The neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of attention. J Child Neurol [Suppl] 6: 88–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Corbetta M, Miezen FM, Dobmeyer S, Shulman GL, Petersen SE (1991): Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J Neurosci 11: 2383–2402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dale AM, Buckner RL (1997): Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 5: 329–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dehaene S, Posner MI, Tucker DM (1994): Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 5: 303–305. [Google Scholar]
  19. Derbyshire SWG, Vogt BA, Jones AKP (1998): Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 118: 52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA (1995): Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 118: 279–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Drevets WC, Price JL, Simpson JR Jr., Todd RD, Reich T, Vannier M, Raichle ME (1997): Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders. Nature 386: 824–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dulaney CL, Rogers WA (1994): Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults. J Exp Psychol [Learn Mem Cogn] 20: 470–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dum RP, Strick PL (1993): Cingulate motor areas In: Vogt BA, Gabriel M. (eds): Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus: A Comprehensive Handbook. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp 415–441. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dyer FN (1973): The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Mem Cogn 1: 106–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Feinstein A, Brown R, Ron M (1994): Effects of practice of serial tests of attention in healthy subjects. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16: 436–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Flowers JH, Warner JL, Polansky ML (1979): Response and encoding factors in “ignoring” irrelevant information. Mem Cogn 7: 86–94. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fox LA, Shor RE, Steinman RJ (1971): Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity. J Exp Psychol 91: 59–65. [Google Scholar]
  28. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Passingham RE, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ (1992): Motor practice and neurophysiological adaptation in the cerebellum: Apositron tomography study. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 248: 223–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Frith CD, Friston KJ, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ (1991): A PET study of word finding. Neuropsychologia 29: 1137–1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. George MSEC, Ketter TA, Parekh PI, Rosinsky N, Ring H, Casey BJ, Trimble MR, Horwitz B, Herscovitch P, Post RM (1994): Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the Stroop and an emotional Stroop. Hum Brain Mapp 1: 194–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. George MSEC, Ketter TA, Parekh PI, Rosinsky N, Ring H, Pazzeglia PJ, Marangell LB, Callahan AM, Post RM (1997): Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop). J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 9: 55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gholson B, Hohle RH (1968): Choice reaction times to hues printed in conflicting hue names and nonsense words. J Exp Psychol 76: 413–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Golden CJ (1974): Effect of differing number of colors on the Stroop Color and Word Test. Percept Mot Skills 39: 1067–1070. [Google Scholar]
  34. Goldman‐Rakic PS (1988): Topography of cognition: Parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 11: 137–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jensen AR (1965): Scoring the Stroop test. Acta Psychol (Amst) 24: 398–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jensen AR, Rohwer WD Jr (1966): The Stroop Color‐Word Test: A review. Acta Psychol (Amst) 25: 36–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jiang A, Kennedy D, Baker J, Weisskoff R, Tootell R, Woods R, Benson R, Kwong KK, Brady T, Rosen BR, Belliveau J (1995): Motion detection and correction in functional MR imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 3: 224–235. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jiang A, Kennedy DN, Baker JR, Benson RR, Rosen BR, Belliveau JW (1996): Morphologic region analysis of statistical parameter maps in fMRI. Neuroimage 3: 67. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kalaska JF, Crammond DJ (1995): Deciding not to go: Neuronal correlates of response selection in a go/nogo task in primate premotor and parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 5: 410–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kawashima R, Satoh K, Itoh H, Ono S, Furumoto S, Gotoh R, Koyoma M, Yoshioka S, Takahashi T, Takahashi K, Yanagisawa T, Fukuda H (1996): Functional anatomy of GO/NO‐GO discrimination and response selection—A PET study in man. Brain Res 728: 79–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kingma A, Heij WL, Fasotti L, Eling P (1996): Stroop interference and disorders of selective attention. Neuropsychologia 34: 273–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kwong KK (1995): Functional magnetic resonance imaging with echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Q 11: 1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. La Heij W, Van der Heijden AHC, Schreuder R (1985): Semantic priming and Stroop‐like interference in word‐naming tasks. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept] 11: 62–80. [Google Scholar]
  44. MacLeod CM (1991): Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychol Bull 109: 163–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. MacLeod CM, Dunbar K (1988): Training and Stroop‐like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. J Exp Psychol [Learn Mem Cogn] 10: 304–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mansfield P (1977): Multi‐planar image formation using NMR spin echoes. J Physics 10: 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mayberg HS (1997): Limbic‐cortical dysregulation: A proposed model of depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 9: 471–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. McClain L (1983): Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color‐word performance. Percept Mot Skills 56: 735–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mega MSEC, Cummings JL (1997a): The cingulate and cingulated syndromes In: Trimble MR, Cummings JL. (eds): Contemporary Behavioral Neurology. Boston: Butterworth‐Heinemann, pp 189–214. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mega MSEC, Cummings JL (1997b): The limbic system: An anatomic, phylogenetic, and clinical perspective. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 9: 315–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mesulam M‐M (1990): Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol 28: 597–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Morton J (1969): Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. Br J Psychol 60: 329–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Murtha S, Chertkow H, Beauregard M, Dixon R, Evans A (1996): Anticipation causes increased blood flow to the anterior cingulated cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 4: 103–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nielssen GD (1975): The locus and mechanism of the Stroop color word effect (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wisconsin‐Madison). Dissertation Abstr Int 35: 5672.
  55. Ogura C (1980): Formation of learning‐set in the task of Stroop color‐word test. J Child Dev 16: 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  56. Oldfield RC (1971): The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsycholgia 9: 97–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pandya DN, Van Hoesen GW, Mesulam MM (1981): Efferent connections of the cingulate gyrus in the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 42: 319–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pardo JV, Pardo PJ, Janer KW, Raichle ME (1990): The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 256–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Paus T, Petrides M, Evans AC, Meyer E (1993): Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: A positron emission tomography study. J Neurophysiol 70: 453–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Petersen SE, Fox PT, Posner MI, Mintun M, Raichle ME (1988): Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single‐word processing. Nature 331: 585–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Posner MI, Dehaene S (1994): Attentional networks. Trends eurosci 17: 75–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990): The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 13: 25–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Raichle ME, Fiez JA, Videen TO, MacLeod AK, Pardo JV, Fox PT, Petersen SE (1994): Practice‐related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cereb Cortex 4: 8–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rauch SL, Jenike MA, Alpert NM, Baer L, Breiter HC, Savage CR, Fischman AJ (1994): Regional cerebral blood flow measured during symptom provocation in obsessive‐compulsive disorder using 15‐O‐labeled CO2 and positron emission tomography. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51: 62–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rauch SL, Savage CR, Alpert NM, Miguel EC, Baer L, Breiter HC, Fischman AJ, Manzo PA, Moretti C, Jenike MA (1995): Apositron emission tomographic study of simple phobic symptom provocation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52: 20–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rauch SL, van der Kolk BA, Fisler RE, Alpert NM, Orr SP, Savage CR, Fischman AJ, Jenike MA, Pitman RK (1996): A symptom provocation study of posttraumatic stress disorder using positron emission tomography and script‐driven imagery. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53: 380–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ray C (1974): The manipulation of color response times in a color‐word interference task. Percept Psychophysics 16: 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  68. Redding GM, Gerjets DA (1977): Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses. Percept Mot Skills 45: 11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Reese TG, Davis TL, Weisskoff RM (1995): Automated shimming at 1.5 T using echo‐planar image frequency maps. J MRI 5: 739–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Reisberg D, Baron J, Kemler DG (1980): Overcoming Stroop interference: The effects of practice on distracter potency. J Exp Psychol 6: 140–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Roe WT, Wilsoncroft WE, Griffiths RS (1980): Effects of motor and verbal practice on the Stroop task. Percept Mot Skills 50: 647–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Rosahl SK, Knight RT (1995): Role of prefrontal cortex in generation of the contingent negative variation. Cereb Cortex 2: 123–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Santos JF, Montgomery JR (1962): Stability of performance on the color‐word test. Percept Mot Skills 15: 397–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schubo W, Hentschel U (1977): Improved reliability estimates for the serial color‐word test. Scand J Psychol 19: 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  75. Shor RE (1971): Symbol processing speed differences and symbol interference effects in a variety of concept domains. J Gen Psychol 85: 187–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Shor RE, Hatch RP, Hudson LJ, Landrigan DT, Shaffer HJ (1972): Effect of practice on a Stroop‐like spatial directions task. J Exp Psychol 94: 168–172. [Google Scholar]
  77. Smith GJ, Nyman GE (1974): The validity of the serial color‐word test: Areply to Lennart Sjöberg. Scand J Psychol 15: 238–240. [Google Scholar]
  78. Stroop JR (1935): Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18: 643–662. [Google Scholar]
  79. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988): Co‐Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  80. Taylor SF, Kornblum S, Minoshima S, Oliver LM, Koeppe RA (1994): Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus‐response compatibility task. Neuropsychologia 32: 249–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Tootell RBH, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Malach R, Born RT, Belliveau JW (1995): Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 15: 3215–3230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Treisman A, Fearnley S (1969): The Stroop test: Selective attention to colours and words. Nature 222: 437–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Vogt BA (1993): Structural organization of cingulate cortex: Areas, neurons, and somatodendritic transmitter receptors In: Vogt BA, Gabriel M. (eds): Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus: A Comprehensive Handbook. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp 19–70. [Google Scholar]
  84. Vogt BA, Finch DM, Olson CR (1992): Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: The anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions [review]. Cereb Cortex 2: 435–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Vogt BA, Pandya DN (1987): Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: II. Cortical afferents. J. Comp. Neurol. 262: 271–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Whalen PJ, Bush G, McNally R, Wilhelm S, Jenike MA, Rauch SL (1997): Functional MRI study of the Digital Emotional Stroop task. Cognitive Neuroscience Soc 4th Annu Meet 4: 128. [Google Scholar]
  87. Whalen PJ, Bush G, McNally RJ, Wilhelm S, McInerney SC, Jenike MA, Rauch SL. (1998) The Emotional Counting Stroop Paradigm: An fMRI probe of the anterior cingulate affective division. Biological Psychiatry (submitted). [DOI] [PubMed]
  88. White BW (1969): Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names. Percept Psychophysics 6: 166–168. [Google Scholar]
  89. Williams E (1977): The effects of amount of information on the Stroop color word test. Percept Psychophysics 22: 463–470. [Google Scholar]
  90. Windes JD (1968): Reaction time for numerical coding and naming of numerals. J Exp Psychol 78: 318–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC (1992): Automated algorithm for aligning tomographic images. II. Cross‐modality MRI‐PET registration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16: 620–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES