Skip to main content
Human Brain Mapping logoLink to Human Brain Mapping
. 1998 Dec 7;6(5-6):368–372. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:5/6<368::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-E

Independent component analysis of fMRI data: Examining the assumptions

Martin J McKeown 1,, Terrence J Sejnowski 1,2
PMCID: PMC6873375  PMID: 9788074

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA), which separates fMRI data into spatially independent patterns of activity, has recently been shown to be a suitable method for exploratory fMRI analysis. The validity of the assumptions of ICA, mainly that the underlying components are spatially independent and add linearly, was explored with a representative fMRI data set by calculating the log‐likelihood of observing each voxel's time course conditioned on the ICA model. The probability of observing the time courses from white‐matter voxels was higher compared to other observed brain regions. Regions containing blood vessels had the lowest probabilities. The statistical distribution of probabilities over all voxels did not resemble that expected for a small number of independent components mixed with Gaussian noise. These results suggest the ICA model may more accurately represent the data in specific regions of the brain, and that both the activity‐dependent sources of blood flow and noise are non‐Gaussian. Hum. Brain Mapping 6:368–372, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: independent component analysis, statistical analysis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (87.7 KB).

References

  1. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1995): An information‐maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7: 1129–1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Comon P (1994): Independent component analysis: A new concept? Signal Processing 36: 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  3. Friston KJ (1996): Statistical parametric mapping and other analyses of functional imaging data In: Toga AW, Mazziotta JC. (eds): Brain Mapping: The Methods. San Diego: Academic Press, pp 363–396. [Google Scholar]
  4. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS (1993): Functional connectivity: The principal‐component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13: 5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee T‐W, Koehler BU, Orglmeister R (1997): Blind source separation of nonlinear mixing models In: Principe J. (ed.) Proceedings of “IEEE International Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing,” pp 406–415 New York, IEEE, Inc. (Florida, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  6. McKeown MJ, Humphries C, Achermann P, Borbely A, Sejnowski TJ (1998a): A new method for detecting state changes in the EEG: Exploratory application to sleep data. J Sleep Res, 7 (suppl. 1), 48–56. (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McKeown MJ, Jung T‐P, Makeig S, Brown GG, Kindermann SS, Lee T‐W, Sejnowski TJ (1998b): Spatially independent activity patterns in functional magnetic resonance imaging data during the Stroop color‐naming task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 803–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McKeown MJ, Makeig S, Brown GG, Jung T‐P, Kindermann SS, Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1998c): Analysis of fMRI data by decomposition into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapp 6: 160–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES