Skip to main content
Human Brain Mapping logoLink to Human Brain Mapping
. 1998 Dec 7;6(5-6):403–408. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:5/6<403::AID-HBM14>3.0.CO;2-9

Dynamic changes in effective connectivity characterized by variable parameter regression and kalman filtering

Christian Büchel 1,, KJ Friston 1
PMCID: PMC6873378  PMID: 9788081

Abstract

Attention to visual motion can increase the responsiveness of the motion‐selective cortical area V5 and the posterior parietal cortex. We addressed attentional modulation of effective connectivity using variable parameter regression and functional magnetic resonance imaging. We present data from a single subject scanned under identical stimulus conditions (visual motion) while varying only the attentional component of the task. Variable parameter regression of the influence of V5 on PP revealed increased effective connectivity during attention to visual motion. With this dynamic measure of effective connectivity we were able to make inferences about the source of modulation by looking for regions that predicted the observed changes in connectivity. Using an ordinary regression analysis, we showed that activity in the prefrontal cortex could explain these changes and was sufficient to account for these modulatory influences on connections in the dorsal visual pathway. Hum. Brain Mapping 6:403–408, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: effective connectivity, fMRI, attention, Kalman filter, variable parameter regression

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (156.7 KB).

References

  1. Büchel C, Friston KJ (1997): Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: Cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cereb Cortex 7: 768–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Büchel C, Wise RJS, Mummery CJ, Poline JB, Friston KJ (1996): Nonlinear regression in parametric activation studies. Neuroimage 4: 60–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooley TF, Prescott EC (1976): Estimation in the presence of stochastic parameter variation. Econometrica 44: 167–184. [Google Scholar]
  4. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KP, Poline JB, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ (1995a): Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2: 189–210. [Google Scholar]
  5. Friston KJ, Ungerleider LG, Jezzard P, Turner R (1995b): Characterizing modulatory interactions between V1 and V2 in human cortex with fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2: 211–224. [Google Scholar]
  6. Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ (1997): Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6: 218–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garbade K (1977): Two methods for examining the stability of regression coefficients. J Am Stat Assoc 72: 54–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kalman RE (1960): Anew approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans ASME J Basic Eng 82: 35–45. [Google Scholar]
  9. McIntosh AR, Gonzalez‐Lima F (1994): Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2: 2–22. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES