Abstract
We screened samples from common shrews (Sorex araneus) collected in Germany during 2004–2014 and identified 3 genetically divergent rotaviruses. Virus protein 6 sequence similarities to prototype rotaviruses were low (64.5% rotavirus A, 50.1% rotavirus C [tentative species K], 48.2% rotavirus H [tentative species L]). Shrew-associated rotaviruses might have zoonotic potential.
Keywords: rotavirus, shrews, common shrew, Sorex araneus, virus diversity, rotavirus A, rotavirus C, rotavirus H, tentative species, Germany, viruses, diarrheal disease, epidemiology, zoonoses, next-generation sequencing, phylogeny, enteric infections
Rotaviruses are a major cause of diarrhea in young children, causing an estimated 215,000 deaths worldwide every year (1). These viruses are nonenveloped and have a genome consisting of 11 segments of double-stranded RNA (2); each segment codes for either 1 of the structural proteins, virus protein (VP) 1–7, or 1 or 2 of the nonstructural proteins (NSPs), NSP1–6. Rotaviruses are classified into species A–I or the tentative species J on the basis of the amino acid sequence similarity of the conserved structural protein VP6 and the conserved nucleotide sequence of the genome segment ends (3–5). For rotavirus A, further classification into genome segment–specific genotypes has been established (6). Rotaviruses can infect a wide diversity of animals, and zoonotic transmission of rotaviruses has been reported (7).
Shrews are small insectivorous mammals that have been previously identified as reservoirs for other pathogens (e.g., hantaviruses and Leptospira spp.) (8–10). In this investigation, we aimed to determine whether common shrews (Sorex araneus, order Eulipotyphla) are also a reservoir for rotaviruses and, if so, assess the genetic variability of the viruses found in this species.
The Study
During 2004–2014, small mammals were caught in different regions of Germany as part of local monitoring or pest control measures (9,10). From these animal collections, we acquired samples (intestine contents) collected from 49 common shrews (Figure 1). We combined these samples almost equally into 2 pools and performed RNA extraction followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine system (ThermoFisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com; Appendix). By applying the RIEMS data analysis pipeline (11), we identified 3 short contigs with low sequence similarities to rotavirus H in both pools. To identify the positive animals, we extracted RNA from individual samples and screened for rotavirus RNA using reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) with primers specific to 1 of the 3 rotavirus H contigs we previously obtained (Appendix Table 1). In total, 7 (15.2%) of 46 samples turned out to be positive for species H–like rotavirus (Table 1); 2 samples, KS/12/0644 and KS/11/2281, generated the strongest signal on ethidium bromide staining. We subjected these 2 samples to RNase and DNase treatment followed by RNA extraction and NGS using the NextSeq 500 sequencing system (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com); 8,576,782 read pairs for KS/12/0644 and 6,168,437 for KS/11/2281 were generated. After a RAMBO-K analysis (12) suggested a low abundance of highly deviant rotavirus sequences, we performed data analysis and contig assembly using a newly generated pipeline (Appendix). By this method, contig lengths were 164–3,017 nt, and we obtained 48 contigs with sequence similarities to rotavirus A, 17 with low sequence similarities to rotavirus C, and 23 with low sequence similarities to rotavirus H (Appendix Table 2). Because contigs of homologous genes from each of the 3 viruses were detected in these samples, we concluded 3 different rotaviruses were present in both.
Table 1. Rotavirus infections detected in common shrews (Sorex araneus) sampled in Germany, 2004–2014*.
Virus species | Monoinfections | Co-infections with |
Total infections | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVA | RVC | RVH | RVA and RVC | RVC and RVH | RVA and RVH | |||
RVA | 7/46 (15.2) | NA | 0/46 | 1/46 (2.2) | NA | 2/46 (4.3) | NA | 10/46 (21.7) |
RVC-like | 3/46 (6.5) | 0/46 | NA | 0/46 | NA | NA | 2/46 (4.3) | 5/46 (10.9) |
RVH-like | 4/46 (4.3) | 1/46 (2.2) | 0/46 | NA | 2/46 (4.3) | NA | NA | 7/46 (15.2) |
*Samples from shrews were examined by reverse transcription PCRs specific for RVA, RVC-like, and RVH-like species. Values are no. positive/total (%). NA, not applicable; RVA, rotavirus A; RVC, rotavirus C; RVH, rotavirus H.
We then performed RT-PCR with all samples using primers specific to the species A and species C–like rotavirus contigs from the previous analysis, and 21.7% (10/46) were positive for species A rotavirus and 10.9% (5/46) for species C–like rotavirus; rotavirus co-infections were also identified (Table 1). An analysis of the geographic distribution of shrew rotaviruses in Germany shows that species C–like rotaviruses were mainly located in the northeast and southwest, species H–like rotaviruses mainly in the south, and species A rotaviruses broadly throughout (Figure 1). At the monitoring site in Baden-Württemberg (southwest Germany), frequent detections of different rotaviruses and multiple co-infections were observed.
Despite several efforts, we could delineate only partial genomic sequences of rotaviruses from the NGS data. By application of primer ligation, rapid amplification of cDNA ends, and degenerated primer RT-PCR strategies, we acquired the complete open reading frames of VP1, VP6, and NSP5 of most viruses (Table 2). In addition, we reamplified and sequenced the VP6 genes of all viruses by dideoxy chain–termination sequencing and confirmed the VP6 sequences obtained. Sequence analysis of these genes and in silico translation indicated 14.1%–65.6% amino acid sequence similarity to the respective proteins of other rotavirus species (Table 2). The Rotavirus Classification Working Group reviewed the sequences of the shrew rotavirus A genes in sample KS/11/2281 and designated the new genotypes R23 for VP1, I27 for VP6, and H23 for NSP5. The maximum amino acid sequence similarities to established rotavirus type species of 50.1% for VP6 of species C–like rotavirus and 48.2% (species H) or 48.3% (species J) for VP6 of species H–like rotavirus suggest that these viruses should be classified as novel (tentative) rotavirus species (Table 2).
Table 2. Sequence similarities of deduced VP1, VP6, and NSP5 amino acid sequences of rotaviruses from common shrews (Sorex araneus), Germany, 2004–2014*.
Comparator rotavirus species and strain | Rotavirus species type (shrew sample designation), protein |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A (KS/11/2281) |
C-like (KS/11/2281) |
H-like (KS/12/0644) |
|||||||||
VP1 | VP6 | NSP5 | VP1† | VP6‡ | NSP5 | VP1 | VP6 | NSP5 | |||
A, SA11 | 65.6 | 64.5 | 47.6 | 48.6 | 40.2 | 24.5 | 26.8 | 20.3 | 17.6 | ||
B, WH-1 | 27.4 | 17.1 | 15.9 | 24.9 | 14.7 | 17.6 | 55.5 | 39.2 | 32.9 | ||
C, Bristol | 48.0 | 42.8 | 24.6 | 63.2 | 50.1 | 31.5 | 25.8 | 20.0 | 16.8 | ||
D, 05V0059 | 51.8 | 39.8 | 18.2 | 48.3 | 36.1 | 17.8 | 25.7 | 20.3 | 14.5 | ||
F, 03V0568 | 57.5 | 34.1 | 20.2 | 48.5 | 32.3 | 22.8 | 26.0 | 15.2 | 17.4 | ||
G, 03V0567 | 26.4 | 19.1 | 12.4 | 25.9 | 17.1 | 17.1 | 56.1 | 40.7 | 34.8 | ||
H, J19 | 27.3 | 17.3 | 18.8 | 25.7 | 17.4 | 15.1 | 63.1 | 48.2 | 38.2 | ||
I, KE135/2012 | 26.2 | 17.6 | 14.1 | 26.0 | 13.8 | 15.9 | 59.0 | 44.5 | 33.3 | ||
J, BO4351/Ms/2014 | 27.0 | 18.1 | 15.2 | 25.2 | 14.5 | 14.1 | 63.0 | 48.3 | 43.9 |
*Values are % sequence similarities. NSP, nonstructural protein; VP, virus protein. †Incomplete at N terminus (≈70 aa residues missing) and C terminus (≈10 aa residues missing). ‡Incomplete at N terminus (≈40 aa residues missing).
Phylogenetic analyses of the VP1, VP6, and NSP5 proteins indicate a consistent branching of shrew rotavirus A with other rotavirus A species and shrew species C–like rotavirus with other rotavirus C species. However, the species H–like rotavirus branches more variably within the rotavirus B-G-H-I-J cluster (Figure 2). A more detailed phylogenetic analysis of complete and additional partial genome segment nucleotide sequences of the shrew rotavirus A showed a basal branching at the cluster of other species A rotavirus sequences for most genes (Appendix Figure 1). In addition, phylogenetic analyses of partial amino acid sequences deduced from other genes of the shrew species C–like and H–like rotaviruses confirmed the relationship evident from analyses of the 3 completely sequenced open reading frames (Appendix Figure 2–4).
Shrews have been analyzed infrequently for rotaviruses. In 1 study, rotavirus antigen was detected in wild Chinese tree shrews (Tupaia chinensis, order Scandentia) (13), and in another study, species A rotaviruses not identical to those of our study (Appendix Figure 1) were identified in house shrews (Suncus murinus, order Eulipotyphla) from China (14). Here, a broader rotavirus screening of common shrew samples resulted in the identification of novel rotaviruses. The rotavirus detection rate of 10.9%–21.7% in the analyzed samples from animals from different regions of Germany suggests a wide circulation of rotaviruses in shrews, although more samples should be analyzed in the future to clarify the association of rotaviruses with these animals. We also identified co-infections with >1 rotavirus, a regular finding in other animal host species (15).
The shrew rotavirus A sequences showed low similarities with other species A rotaviruses, resulting in the assignment of novel genotypes and suggesting a long-term separate evolution of these viruses in this shrew species. The 2 other rotaviruses identified showed even lower sequence similarities to the known rotavirus species. According to the cutoff value of 53% suggested for the differentiation of rotavirus species on the basis of the encoded VP6 amino acid sequence (5), both viruses should be considered new rotavirus species, which we tentatively designate rotavirus species K (for the rotavirus C–like species) and L (for the rotavirus H–like species). However, because their complete genome sequences have not been determined, a final classification of these viruses remains to be accomplished. At least the 5′ and 3′ termini of these rotavirus genome segments, which are conserved within known rotavirus species (2), should be determined. The low virus amounts in samples, restricted available sample volumes, presence of multiple viruses in single samples, and low sequence similarities for some virus genes might help explain the failure to generate complete genome sequences in our study.
Conclusions
We identified multiple, genetically divergent rotavirus species in common shrews in Germany. These animals should be further investigated as a potential reservoir for rotaviruses capable of infecting humans.
Acknowledgments
The excellent technical assistance of Anke Mandelkow and Patrick Zitzow and the generation of Figure 1 by Patrick Wysocki are kindly acknowledged.
Sample collection and distribution were supported in part by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the German Research Platform for Zoonoses (network rodent-borne pathogens, FKZ 01KI1018 and 01KI1303 to R.G.U.). The initial NGS screening was supported in part by the contract research project for the Bundeswehr Medical Service FV E/U2AD/CF512/DF557 META-InfRisk and by European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program COMPARE (grant no. 643476). Further NGS and rotavirus sequence analyses were supported by grants of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (project ESS-B.A.R., FKZ 13N13982) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany (grant nos. JO369/4-3 and JO369/5-1).
Biography
Dr. Johne is a senior scientist at the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany. His research interests are the epidemiology, molecular evolution, pathogenesis, and transmission pathways of foodborne viruses.
Footnotes
Suggested citation for this article: Johne R, Tausch SH, Grützke J, Falkenhagen A, Patzina-Mehling C, Beer M, et al. Distantly related rotaviruses in common shrews, Germany, 2004–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Dec [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2512.191225
References
- 1.Tate JE, Burton AH, Boschi-Pinto C, Parashar UD; World Health Organization–Coordinated Global Rotavirus Surveillance Network. Global, regional, and national estimates of rotavirus mortality in children <5 years of age, 2000–2013. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(Suppl 2):S96–105. 10.1093/cid/civ1013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Attoui H, Mertens PPC, Becnel J, Belaganahalli S, Bergoin M, Brussaard CP, et al. Family: Reoviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus taxonomy: ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2012. p. 541–637. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bányai K, Kemenesi G, Budinski I, Földes F, Zana B, Marton S, et al. Candidate new rotavirus species in Schreiber’s bats, Serbia. Infect Genet Evol. 2017;48:19–26. 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Taxonomic information. Virus taxonomy: 2018b release. 2018. Jul [cited 2019 Aug 21]. https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy
- 5.Matthijnssens J, Otto PH, Ciarlet M, Desselberger U, Van Ranst M, Johne R. VP6-sequence-based cutoff values as a criterion for rotavirus species demarcation. Arch Virol. 2012;157:1177–82. 10.1007/s00705-012-1273-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matthijnssens J, Ciarlet M, Rahman M, Attoui H, Bányai K, Estes MK, et al. Recommendations for the classification of group A rotaviruses using all 11 genomic RNA segments. Arch Virol. 2008;153:1621–9. 10.1007/s00705-008-0155-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martella V, Bányai K, Matthijnssens J, Buonavoglia C, Ciarlet M. Zoonotic aspects of rotaviruses. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:246–55. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schlegel M, Radosa L, Rosenfeld UM, Schmidt S, Triebenbacher C, Löhr PW, et al. Broad geographical distribution and high genetic diversity of shrew-borne Seewis hantavirus in Central Europe. Virus Genes. 2012;45:48–55. 10.1007/s11262-012-0736-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fischer S, Mayer-Scholl A, Imholt C, Spierling NG, Heuser E, Schmidt S, et al. Leptospira genomospecies and sequence type prevalence in small mammal populations in Germany. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18:188–99. 10.1089/vbz.2017.2140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mayer-Scholl A, Hammerl JA, Schmidt S, Ulrich RG, Pfeffer M, Woll D, et al. Leptospira spp. in rodents and shrews in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:7562–74. 10.3390/ijerph110807562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Scheuch M, Höper D, Beer M. RIEMS: a software pipeline for sensitive and comprehensive taxonomic classification of reads from metagenomics datasets. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:69. 10.1186/s12859-015-0503-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tausch SH, Renard BY, Nitsche A, Dabrowski PW. RAMBO-K: rapid and sensitive removal of background sequences from next generation sequencing data. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137896. 10.1371/journal.pone.0137896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang XX, Li JX, Wang WG, Sun XM, He CY, Dai JJ. [Preliminary investigation of viruses to the wild tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri Chinese)]. Dongwuxue Yanjiu. 2011;32:66–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li K, Lin XD, Huang KY, Zhang B, Shi M, Guo WP, et al. Identification of novel and diverse rotaviruses in rodents and insectivores, and evidence of cross-species transmission into humans. Virology. 2016;494:168–77. 10.1016/j.virol.2016.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Otto PH, Rosenhain S, Elschner MC, Hotzel H, Machnowska P, Trojnar E, et al. Detection of rotavirus species A, B and C in domestic mammalian animals with diarrhoea and genotyping of bovine species A rotavirus strains. Vet Microbiol. 2015;179:168–76. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.