Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Genet. 2019 Oct 21;138(11-12):1419–1421. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02072-y

Arteriovenous Malformation Associated with a HRAS Mutation

Dennis J Konczyk 1, Jeremy A Goss 1, Patrick J Smits 1, August Y Huang 2, Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi 3, Christopher L Sudduth 1, Matthew L Warman 2,4, Arin K Greene 1
PMCID: PMC6874881  NIHMSID: NIHMS1541310  PMID: 31637524

Abstract

The majority of extracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are caused by somatic mutations in MAP2K1. We report a somatic HRAS mutation in a patient who has a facial AVM associated with subcutaneous adipose overgrowth. We performed whole exome sequencing on DNA from the affected tissue and found a HRAS mutation (p.Thr58_Ala59delinsValLeuAspVal). Mutant allelic frequency was 5% in whole tissue and 31% in isolated endothelial cells (ECs); the mutation was not present in blood DNA or non-ECs. Somatic mutations in HRAS can cause AVM.

Keywords: adipose, arteriovenous malformation, HRAS, vascular

SHORT REPORT

Most extracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) arise sporadically and are caused by somatic mutations in MAP2K1; mutations in BRAF and KRAS also have been identified (Couto et al. 2017; Al-Olabi et al. 2018). Sporadic AVMs have not exhibited a genotype-phenotype relationship (Couto et al. 2017; Al-Olabi et al. 2018). We report here that extracranial AVM also can be caused by a somatic mutation in HRAS.

AVM tissue was collected during a clinically-indicated procedure from an 11-year-old female with an AVM of her cheek and endothelial cells (ECs) were separated from non-ECs (Fig. 1). DNA was extracted from tissue, cells, and blood (unaffected tissue) using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed by Macrogen and analyzed for putative somatic disease-causing mutations. Single-nucleotide and indel mutations having ≥ 2% mutant allelic fraction and ≥ 5 reads were identified using MosaicHunter and MuTect (Cibulskis et al. 2013; Huang et al. 2017). Common variants reported in population polymorphism databases were excluded. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was used to confirm the mutation (Table 1). Whole cell lysates were obtained from the AVM-derived ECs as well as wild-type adipose tissue-derived endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) from another patient. 15 μg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE on 4–20% gradient gels. After transfer to a PVDF membrane and blocking in TBST, immune-detection of ERK 1/2 (1/1000 dilution), p-ERK 1/2 (1/1000 dilution), and actin (1/15000 dilution) was performed. Membranes were washed and incubated in anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1/5000 dilution) in blocking buffer. Membranes were visualized with CDP-Star substrate using autoradiography film.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

11-year-old female with a facial arteriovenous malformation (AVM). (A) Appearance of right cheek overgrowth. (B) Preoperative angiogram shows the AVM with tortuous arterial feeding vessels (arrows), a nidus abnormally connecting arteries and veins (circle), and early filling of draining veins (stars). (C) MRI illustrates significant adipose tissue of right cheek (stars). (D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained section (20x) of the excised lesion demonstrates skin and subcutis with abundant adipose tissue extending to the overlying dermis (stars). Dispersed through the dermis and subcutaneous adipose tissue are venular and capillary vascular channels (arrows). (E) Representative Western blot showing increased phosphorylated ERK (pERK) relative to total ERK (ERK) in HRAS mutant endothelial cells (ECs) from the patient with the AVM (right column) compared to wild-type endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) (left column).

Table 1.

HRAS mutation-specific droplet digital PCR primers and probes.

Forward Primer 5’-CCTCACGGGGTTCACCTGTA-3’
Reverse Primer 5’-GGATTCCTACCGGAAGCAGG-3’
Wild-type Probe 5’-/5HEX/CCTGGCCGGCGGTATCCA/3IABkGQ/-3’
Mutant Probe 5’-/56-FAM/CCTGGCCAACATCCAGGACATCC/3IABkFQ/-3’

WES achieved an average coverage of 316-fold and 256-fold for ECs and non-ECs, respectively. By comparing ECs with non-ECs of the same patient, we identified a mutation in HRAS (p.Thr58_Ala59delinsValLeuAspVal) exclusively in ECs with an allelic frequency of 31%. In addition to independently confirming the presence of the mutant allele in ECs, ddPCR also detected a mutant allelic frequency of 5% in the original sample. The mutation was not present in non-ECs or peripheral blood. Western blot analysis of cell lysates showed a higher ratio of phosphorylated ERK (pERK) to non-phosphorylated ERK in the patient’s ECs compared to wild-type ECFCs (Fig. 1).

This report shows that HRAS is a new locus for causing AVM. Like MAP2K1 AVM-associated mutations, we found that HRAS mutations were restricted to ECs, further supporting the role of the EC in the pathophysiology of AVM (Couto et al. 2017; Greene and Goss 2018). The HRAS mutation we identified affects amino acid residues 58 and 59 within the switch II region of the HRAS protein. This region is important for GTP hydrolysis (Hobbs et al. 2016). Somatic missense mutations affecting amino residue 60 are commonly found in cancer and lead to hyperactivation of HRAS signaling (Tate et al. 2019). Thus, it is likely the mutation we identified also increases HRAS signaling. Consistent with this interpretation is that ECs from our patient have an increased pERK to ERK ratio. Compared to most other individuals with AVM, our subject had significant adipose hypertrophy at the AVM site. This raises the possibility that adipocyte overgrowth may be a distinguishing feature of HRAS-associated AVMs. Inhibitors of targets in this pathway might prove to have efficacy for AVMs.

Acknowledgements:

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD093735 (AKG), the Translational Research Program Boston Children’s Hospital (AKG), and the National Institutes of Health under Award Number NIH R01AR064231 (MLW). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Abbreviations:

AVM

arteriovenous malformation

ECs

endothelial cells

WES

whole exome sequencing

ddPCR

droplet digital polymerase chain reaction

pERK

phosphorylated ERK

ECFCs

endothelial colony forming cells

HUVECs

human umbilical vein endothelial cells

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The dataset generated during the current study is available in the ClinVar repository with accession number SCV000992589.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Committee on Clinical Investigation at Boston Children’s Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

INFORMED CONSENT

Consent was obtained for the participant in the study.

REFERENCES

  1. Al-Olabi L, Polubothu S, Dowsett K, et al. (2018) Mosaic RAS/MAPK variants cause sporadic vascular malformations which respond to targeted therapy. J Clin Invest 128:1496–1508. doi: 10.1172/JCI98589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cibulskis K, Lawrence MS, Carter SL, et al. (2013) Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol 31:213–219. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Couto JA, Huang AY, Konczyk DJ, et al. (2017) Somatic MAP2K1 Mutations Are Associated with Extracranial Arteriovenous Malformation. Am J Hum Genet 100:546–554. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greene AK, Goss JA (2018) Vascular Anomalies: From a Clinicohistologic to a Genetic Framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:709e–717e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hobbs GA, Der CJ, Rossman KL (2016) RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance. J Cell Sci 129:1287–1292. doi: 10.1242/jcs.182873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang AY, Zhang Z, Ye AY, et al. (2017) MosaicHunter: Accurate detection of postzygotic single-nucleotide mosaicism through next-generation sequencing of unpaired, trio, and paired samples. Nucleic Acids Res 45:. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tate JG, Bamford S, Jubb HC, et al. (2019) COSMIC: The Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D941–D947. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES