Impact of AKAP6 polymorphisms on Glioma susceptibility and prognosis

Abstract

Purpose

Glioma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor with high mortality and poor prognosis. Our aim was to clarify the correlation between Kinase-anchored protein 6 (AKAP6) gene polymorphisms and glioma susceptibility and prognosis in Chinese Han population.

Methods

Five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of AKAP6 were genotyped by Agena MassARRAY in 575 glioma patients and 500 healthy controls. Logistic regression model was utilized to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The associations between polymorphisms and survival were assessed using the log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model.

Results

We found that rs2239647 polymorphism was strongly associated with an increased risk of glioma (OR = 1.90, p = 0.007) and a worse prognosis for glioma, especially in high-grade glioma (HR = 1.67, p = 0.034). Stratified analysis showed that rs2239647 increased the risk of glioma in female (OR = 1.62, p = 0.016). Whereas, rs4261436 (HR = 0.70, p = 0.045) and rs17522122 (HR = 0.75, p = 0.016) were associated with better prognosis of astrocytoma. In addition, we also found that surgical methods and chemotherapy are critical factors for the prognosis of glioma patients.

Conclusions

This study firstly provided evidence for the impact of AKAP6 polymorphisms on susceptibility and prognosis of glioma, suggesting AKAP6 variants might have potential roles in the etiology of glioma.

Introduction

Glioma is a highly fatal disease that accounts for about 28% of all primary brain tumors in the United States. (1, 2). Gliomas are often fatal because many drugs that are effective against tumors throughout the body cannot cross the blood-brain barrier. Despite advances in treatment over the past few years, the prognosis for glioma patients remains poor, with a median overall survival rate (OS) of only 8 to 15 months (3, 4). The etiology of glioma involves various aspects, among which the role of genetic factors including genetic polymorphisms in the susceptibility and prognosis of glioma has aroused great concern. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of some genes have been shown to be associated with the risk or prognosis of glioma, such as Interleukin 4 Receptor (IL-4R), EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 1 (EFEMP1), Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1 (RTEL1), Cocaine and amphetamine regulated transcript (CART) and Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) (5–9).

Kinase-anchored protein 6 (AKAP6), encoded by the AKAP6 gene, is a protein with diverse structures and is highly expressed in various brain regions and cardiac and skeletal muscle. AKAP6 is a member of the AKAP family proteins and performs important functions by binding to the regulatory subunit of protein kinase a (PKA) (10). PKA has been shown to be involved in many important signal transduction pathways. A previous study demonstrated effects of up-regulation of the cAMP/PKA pathway in glioblastoma cell (11). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have confirmed that the SNPs of AKAP6 were associated with brain-related diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (12), anorexia nervosa (13), and poor cognitive, better memory abilities (14).

Based on previous results, we hypothesized that AKAP6 gene polymorphisms may be related to the pathogenesis of glioma. However, no literature supports the effect of AKAP6 polymorphisms on glioma. In this case-control study, we investigated the correlation between AKAP6 single nucleotide polymorphisms and glioma susceptibility and prognosis in the Han Chinese population.

Methods

Study subjects

In this study, 575 glioma patients (including 448 patients with astroglioma) and 500 healthy subjects were randomly recruited from Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. All patients were diagnosed with gliomas by imaging and histopathological, and all patients were unrelated. Demographic and clinical data were collected through standardized questionnaires and follow-up surveys, including age, sex, date of the first diagnosis, method of surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy program, date of last follow-up, and the condition of the patient (alive/dead) at the time of the last follow-up. Healthy subjects in the control group ruled out people with a history of cancer and people with a history of diseases associated with the brain and central nervous system. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University and followed the Helsinki declaration. Each subject was informed of the purpose of our study and signed a written informed consent.

DNA extracting and SNPs genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from glioma patients’ peripheral blood samples (5 mL) using Gold Mag-Mini DNA purification kit (Gold Mag Co. Ltd. Xian city, China). DNA concentrations were determined by the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientifc, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Multiplexed SNP Mass EXTENDED assay was designed by Agena MassARRAY Assay Design Software version 4.0 (Agena Co. Ltd., San Diego, CA, USA). SNP genotyping with a standard protocol was performed using Agena MassARRAY RS1000 (Agena Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Agena Typer Software version 4.0 (Agena Inc., San Diego, California, USA) was used to management the data.

Bioinformatics analysis

Online software for HaploReg v4.1 (https://pubs.broadinstitute.org/ mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php) and SNPinfo Web Server (https://snpinfo. niehs.nih.gov/snpinfo/index.html) were used to predict the possible functional effects on these SNPs.

Statistical analysis

The differences in demographic characteristics of study participants were evaluated using independent samples T test and Chi-square test. Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed using the Chi-square test. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate the relationships between SNPs and glioma risk using logistic regression analysis. Multiple inheritance models (allele model, genotype model, dominant model, recessive model, and additive model) were assessed by PLINK software. Patient survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated through univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to evaluate the effect of the AKAP6 genotypes on overall survival and progression-free survival (15–17). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Software version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistical significance.

Results

Study subjects

This study included 575 glioma patients and 500 age-matched (p = 0.942) and gender-matched (p = 1.000) healthy controls, and the average ages were 40.53 ± 13.90 years and 40.45 ± 18.08 years respectively. The participants’ demographic and clinical information was listed in Table 1, including age, gender, World Health Organization (WHO) grade and classification (18), surgical method, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and survival condition.

Table 1.

Characteristics of glioma patients and healthy controls

Characteristics		Cases (n = 575)	Controls (n = 500)	p
Age, years	Mean ± SD (year)	40.53 ± 13.90	40.45 ± 18.08	0.942a
	≤ 40	279 (49%)	265 (53%)
	>  40	296 (51%)	235 (47%)
Gender				1.000b
	Male	320 (56%)	279 (56%)
	Female	255 (44%)	221 (44%)
WHO grade	I-II	369 (64%)
	III-IV	206 (36%)
astrocytoma		448 (78%)
Surgical method	STR & NTR	184 (32%)
	GTR	394 (68%)
Radiotherapy	Gamma knife	365 (63%)
	Conformal radiotherapy	156 (27%)
	No	57 (10%)
Chemotherapy	Yes	237 (41%)
	No	341 (59%)
State of progress	Progress	538 (93%)
	No	35 (6%)
	Absent	5 (1%)

WHO World Health Organization, GTR Gross-total resection, NTR Near-total resection, STR Sub-total resection

^a p values was calculated by independent samples T test

^b p values was calculated by Chi-square tests

Basic information of the selected SNPs

Five SNPs in AKAP6 (rs1957021, rs2145587, rs2239647, rs4261436 and rs17522122) were genotyped. The basic information of selected SNPs and potential function predicted by HaploReg database about these variants were summarized in Additional file 4: Table S1. All SNPs conformed to the HWE equilibrium (all p values were more than 0.05). The predicted results from the database showed that these SNPs might function as enhancer histone markers or by changing motifs.

The SNPs of AKAP6 and the risk of glioma

Multiple inheritance models analysis (allele, genotype, dominant, recessive and additive) for the association between AKAP6 rs2239647 and risk of glioma are showed in Table 2. Our analysis revealed a relationship between AA genotype of rs2239647 and increased glioma risk in genotype model (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.16–3.04, p = 0.010) and recessive model (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.19–3.03, p = 0.007).

Table 2.

Relationships between AKAP6 rs2239647 and glioblastoma risk

SNP ID	Model	Genotype	Case	Control	Adjusted by age and gender
					OR (95%CI)	p
rs2239647	Allele	C	817	746	1.00	0.086
		A	329	254	1.18 (0.98–1.43)
		CC	302	274	1.00
	Genotype	CA	213	198	0.98 (0.76–1.26)	0.849
		AA	58	28	1.88 (1.16–3.04)	0.010
	Dominant	CC	302	274	1.00	0.494
		CA-AA	271	226	1.09 (0.85–1.38)
	Recessive	CC-CA	515	472	1.00	0.007
		AA	58	28	1.90 (1.19–3.03)
	Additive	AA vs AB vs BB	–	–	1.18 (0.97–1.42)	0.091

SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval

p values were calculated by logistic regression analysis with adjustments for age and gender

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05)

In addition, we conducted a stratified analysis to explore the effects of these SNPs on glioma susceptibility in a specific population. The significant results of stratified analysis are showed in Table 3. The results showed that AA genotype at rs2239647 was significantly associated with increased glioma risk in populations over 40 years old (genotype model: OR = 2.60, p = 0.012; recessive model: OR = 2.83, p = 0.006) and in the male population (genotype model: OR = 2.42, p = 0.003; recessive model: OR = 2.49, p = 0.009). And, people with the rs2239647-AA genotype had a higher risk of astroglioma than healthy controls (genotype model: OR = 1.90, p = 0.012; recessive model: OR = 1.92, p = 0.009). Moreover, rs2145587 was associated with an increased risk of glioma in female (genotype model: OR = 1.62, p = 0.016; dominant model: OR = 1.57, p = 0.017).

Table 3.

Stratified analysis of the relationships between AKAP6 polymorphisms and glioma risk

SNP ID	Models	OR (95%CI)	p	OR (95%CI)	p
Age		≤ 40		>  40
rs2239647	Allele	1.20 (0.92–1.57)	0.171	1.17 (0.89–1.54)	0.273
	Homozygote(AA)	1.68 (0.87–3.24)	0.123	2.60 (1.23–5.51)	0.012
	Heterozygote(CA)	1.19 (0.83–1.71)	0.347	0.82 (0.57–1.18)	0.281
	Dominant	1.26 (0.89–1.78)	0.187	0.98 (0.70–1.39)	0.925
	Recessive	1.56 (0.82–2.95)	0.174	2.83 (1.36–5.89)	0.006
	Additive	1.25 (0.95–1.64)	0.107	1.17 (0.89–1.54)	0.254
Gender		Male		Female
rs2145587	Allele	1.06 (0.84–1.33)	0.633	1.28 (0.98–1.68)	0.065
	Homozygote(AA)	1.16 (0.71–1.90)	0.553	1.40 (0.77–2.53)	0.266
	Heterozygote(CA)	1.00 (0.70–1.43)	0.998	1.62 (1.10–2.38)	0.016
	Dominant	1.04 (0.74–1.45)	0.837	1.57 (1.08–2.27)	0.017
	Recessive	1.16 (0.74–1.82)	0.514	1.08 (0.62–1.87)	0.794
	Additive	1.06 (0.84–1.34)	0.625	1.30 (0.99–1.71)	0.060
rs2239647	Allele	1.22 (0.94–1.58)	0.130	1.14 (0.86–1.51)	0.374
	Homozygote(AA)	2.42 (1.21–4.87)	0.003	1.48 (0.75–2.89)	0.256
	Heterozygote(GA)	0.94 (0.67–1.32)	0.714	1.02 (0.70–1.50)	0.909
	Dominant	1.08 (0.78–1.50)	0.627	1.09 (0.76–1.57)	0.630
	Recessive	2.49 (1.25–4.93)	0.009	1.46 (0.76–2.80)	0.253
	Additive	1.22 (0.94–1.57)	0.135	1.13 (0.86–1.50)	0.384
Classification		Astroglioma patients VS Healthy controls
rs2239647	Allele	1.18 (0.96–1.45)	0.106
	Homozygote(AA)	1.90 (1.15–3.15)	0.012
	Heterozygote(CA)	0.98 (0.75–1.29)	0.900
	Dominant	1.10 (0.85–1.42)	0.485
	Recessive	1.92 (1.17–3.13)	0.009
	Additive	1.19 (0.97–1.45)	0.098

SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval

p values were calculated by logistic regression analysis with adjustments for age and gender

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05)

The SNPs of AKAP6 and the prognostic of glioma

The log-rank test was applied to analyze the associations between overall survival (OS) or progression free survival (PFS) and clinical factors, and the results indicated that gender, age, WHO grading, and radiotherapy factors were not related to the prognosis of patients (p > 0.05), while surgical methods and chemotherapy were significantly related to the prognosis of patients (p < 0.05) (Additional file 5: Table S2 and Additional file 1: Figure S1). We found that the prognosis of glioma patients undergoing total resection was better than patients who did not undergo complete resection (OS: log-rank p < 0.001, HR = 0.63, p < 0.001; PFS: log-rank p < 0.001, HR = 0.59, p < 0.001). The prognosis of patients receiving chemotherapy was better than that of patients not receiving chemotherapy (OS: log-rank p < 0.001, HR = 0.67, p < 0.001; PFS: log-rank p = 0.012, HR = 0.81, p = 0.025).

We evaluated the effect of AKAP6 polymorphisms on the patient survival. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the relationship between rs2239647 and OS and PFS in glioma patients (Table 4 and Fig. 1). We found that AKAP6-rs2239647 significantly affected the PFS of patients with high-level glioma (WHO grade III–IV), and patients with CA genotype had a better prognosis (PFS: log-rank p = 0.045, HR = 1.67, p = 0.034).

Table 4.

The association between rs2239647 and glioma patient OS and PFS

rs2239647	Genotype	OS				PFS
		Log-rank p	SR (1−/3-year)	HR (95%CI)	p	Log-rank p	SR (1−/3-year)	HR (95%CI)	p
	CC	0.227	0.328/0.080	1.00		0.413	0.182/0.084	1.00
	CA		0.327/0.134	1.15 (0.86–1.54)	0.346		0.193/0.122	1.13 (0.84–1.51)	0.424
	AA		0.224/0.034	0.91 (0.76–1.10)	0.325		0.138/0.039	0.94 (0.78–1.13)	0.517
Low-grade glioma(I–II)
	CC	0.124	0.324/0.077	1.00		0.267	0.159/−	1.00
	CA		0.349/0.165	0.96 (0.66–1.39)	0.818		0.232/0.147	0.93 (0.64–1.35)	0.686
	AA		0.270/−	0.80 (0.64–1.01)	0.065		0.189/−	0.84 (0.66–1.06)	0145
High-grade glioma (III–IV)
	CC	0.056	0.333/0.085	1.00		0.045	0.219/0.092	1.00
	CA		0.279/−	1.61 (1.04–2.66)	0.035		0.106/−	1.67 (1.04–2.67)	0.034
	AA		0.143/−	1.19 (0.87–1.63)	0.268		0.048/−	1.21 (0.88–1.66)	0.233

OS Overall survival, PFS Progression free survival, SR Survival rate, HR Hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% Confidence interval

Log-rank p values were calculated using the Chi-Square test

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05)

Fig. 1.

Glioma patient survival based on AKAP6-rs2239647 polymorphism. Kaplan–Meier survival curves are plotted for and progression free survival

Subsequently, we analyzed the effect of AKAP6 polymorphisms on the prognosis of patients with astroglioma (Table 5 and Fig. 2). The results showed that AKAP6-rs4261436 had a significant effect on the OS of patients, and patients with TC genotype had a poor prognosis (OS: log-rank p = 0.038, HR = 0.70, p = 0.045). AKAP6- rs17522122 also had a significant effect on the OS of patients, and patients with TC genotype had a poor prognosis (OS: log-rank p = 0.025, HR = 0.75, p = 0.016).

Table 5.

The association between rs4261436, rs17522122 and astrocytoma patient OS and PFS

SNP ID	Genotype	OS				PFS
		Log-rank p	SR (1−/3-year)	HR (95%CI)	p	Log-rank p	SR (1−/3-year)	HR (95%CI)	p
rs4261436	TT	0.038	0.258/0.033	1.00		0.176	0.152/−	1.00
	TC		0.367/0.116	0.70 (0.49–0.99)	0.045		0.178/−	0.75 (0.53–1.07)	0.116
	CC		0.356/0.111	0.81 (0.64–1.02)	0.078		0.267/−	0.88 (0.70–1.12)	0.308
rs17522122	GG	0.025	0.268/0.049	1.00		0.053	0.137/−	1.00
	GT		0.352/0.106	0.75 (0.59–0.95)	0.016		0.190/−	0.79 (0.55–1.13)	0.686
	TT		0.341/0.042	0.78 (0.54–1.12)	0.818		0.268/−	0.78 (0.62–0.99)	0.038

OS Overall survival, PFS Progression free survival, SR Survival rate, HR Hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% Confidence interval

Log-rank p values were calculated using the Chi-Square test

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05)

Fig. 2.

Astroglioma patient survival based on AKAP6-rs4261436 (A) and -rs17522122 (B) polymorphisms. Kaplan–Meier survival curves are plotted for overall survival

Discussion

This study confirmed the relationship between AKAP6 gene variation and glioma risk or prognosis in Han Chinese population. We found that AKAP6 single nucleotide polymorphisms rs2239647 and rs2145587 were associated with glioma susceptibility. More importantly, rs2239647, rs4261436 and rs17522122 were significantly correlated with the prognosis of patients. In addition, we also found that the extent of the surgical resection and chemotherapy are also key factors for the prognosis of glioma patients.

Previous study has found that AKAP6 protein is highly expressed in the brain (10), and we also used the GEPIA database (http://gepia.pku.cn/) to predict the expression of AKAP6 mRNA, the result showed that the mRNA level of AKAP6 gene was significantly up-regulated in glioma (p < 0.05, Additional file 2: Figure S2). This indicates that AKAP6 gene plays an important role in the occurrence and development of glioma.

SNPs in AKAP6 gene have been associated with several brain-related diseases/traits by GWAS. AKAP6-rs4296166 has been associated with risk of Alzheimer’s disease (12), and rs2383378 was suggestively associated with anorexia nervosa (13). AKAP6-rs17522122 was associated with worse general fluid cognitive performance, verbal numerical reasoning and improved performance in reaction time and memory (14). In this study, it was found that the SNPs of AKAP6 were significantly correlated with the susceptibility and prognosis of glioma. At the same time, using GEPIA database analysis, we also found that AKAP6 gene also had a significant impact on the overall survival rate of low-grade glioma patients (p < 0.05, Additional file 3: Figure S3). Combined with the predicted function of SNPs, we hypothesized that the SNPs of APAK6 may affect gene expression and thereby affect the risk and prognosis of glioma.

PKA phosphorylation is central to the regulation of many cellular processes, and the specificity of PKA signaling is mediated in part by PKA binding to AKAPs. Previous studies have shown the role of cAMP/PKA pathway in glioblastoma cell lines and primary culture. By increasing the level of cAMP or activating PKA directly through cAMP analogues, the proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis of a-172 cells could be decreased (11). Therefore, the regulation of cAMP/PKA pathway may be a possible target for the treatment of malignant glioma. Although the function of AKAP6 gene in this process has not been studied in detail, its importance cannot be ignored. We will verify the function of AKAP6 gene in glioma through experiments in subsequent studies.

There are inevitably some limitations in this study. Firstly, there are regional limitations in sample selection. Subsequent sample selection should expand the geographical scope. Secondly, this study only carried out basic research, lack of functional verification experiments. In the following experiments, we will conduct experimental studies on gene expression of AKAP6 and function of SNPs. Despite the shortcomings, the results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the study of glioma susceptibility.

Conclusion

In summary, our results show that AKAP6 polymorphism is associated with the susceptibility and prognosis of glioma in the Chinese Han population. These associations may provide new directions for risk assessment of glioma and prognosis assessment of glioma patients. However, our results need to be replicated in a larger sample size and validated by functional experiments.

Abbreviations

AKAP6

Kinase-anchored protein 6

CI

Confidence intervals

GWAS

Genome-wide association studies

HR

Hazard ratio

HWE

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

OR

Odds ratios

OS

Overall survival

PFS

Progression free survival

SNPs

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms

WHO

World Health Organization

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, YW; methodology, MZ; software, YZ; data curation, MZ and JZ; writing, review and editing, MZ; visualization, YZ and TH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [grant number: xjj2015018]; the special research fund for personnel training of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University [grant number: RC (XM) 201603]; and a special research fund for the Youth Sciences Foundation of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University [grant number: YJ (QN) 201402].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University and followed the Helsinki declaration. Each subject was informed of the purpose of our study and signed a written informed consent.

Consent for publication

All the authors agreed to publish the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12883-019-1504-2.