Skip to main content
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery logoLink to Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
. 2019 Aug 16;3(6):630–637. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12281

Sarcopenia discriminates poor prognosis in elderly patients following emergency surgery for perforation panperitonitis

Nobuhide Kubo 1,, Hirohumi Kawanaka 1,2, Shoji Hiroshige 1, Hirotada Tajiri 1, Akinori Egashira 1, Hideya Takeuchi 1, Toshifumi Matsumoto 1, Eiji Oki 3, Tokujiro Yano 1
PMCID: PMC6875939  PMID: 31788651

Abstract

Aim

Sarcopenia has been reported as a prognostic predictor in various conditions; however, it has not been examined in patients with perforation panperitonitis.

Methods

A total of 103 consecutive patients with perforation panperitonitis who underwent emergency surgery from 2008 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured as the cross‐sectional area (cm2) of skeletal muscle in the L3 region on computed tomography images normalized for height (cm2/m2). Sarcopenia was defined as an SMI of ≤43.75 and ≤41.10 cm2/m2 in men and women, respectively. The impact of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes was investigated.

Results

Sarcopenia was present in 50 (48.5%) patients. Severe complications (Clavien‐Dindo grade ≥IIIb) and in‐hospital mortality were more frequently observed in patients with than without sarcopenia (28.0% vs 9.4%, P = .015) (20.0% vs 5.7%, P = .029) respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, sarcopenia, and renal dysfunction were independent risk factors for severe complications and in‐hospital mortality. The optimal cut‐off levels of age and SMI for predicting these were ≥79 years and SMI <38 cm2/m2, respectively. Among the patients aged ≥79 years, those with SMI <38 cm2/m2 had a severe complication rate of 71% and an in‐hospital mortality rate of 57%, whereas the rate of those with SMI ≥38 cm2/m2 was 22% (P = .011) and 11% (P = .008), respectively.

Conclusion

Sarcopenia is a predictive factor of severe complications and in‐hospital mortality following emergency surgery for perforation panperitonitis, especially in elderly patients. Estimation of sarcopenia may identify patients eligible or not eligible for emergency surgery among elderly patients.

Keywords: complication, emergency surgery, mortality, panperitonitis, sarcopenia


Sarcopenia is a predictive factor of severe complications and in‐hospital mortality following emergency surgery for perforation panperitonitis, especially in elderly patients. Estimation of sarcopenia may discriminate patients eligible or not eligible for emergency surgery among elderly patients.

graphic file with name AGS3-3-630-g004.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Patients with panperitonitis caused by perforation of the digestive and biliary tract require emergency surgery, but their postoperative course is often difficult to manage. High rates of complications and hospital death are usually reported especially in elderly patients.1, 2 Several preoperative predictive systems, such as the Calculation of post‐Operative Risk in Emergency Surgery (CORES) score3 and Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM),4 have been reported to assess morbidity and mortality in emergency surgery. However, these scoring systems require many variables, including subjective variables such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, the Japan Coma Scale, or the Glasgow Coma Scale, and are time‐consuming. Moreover, these do not reflect the patient's general health status before admission.

In 1989, the term “sarcopenia” was proposed by Irwin Rosenberg to describe the age‐related decline of muscle mass.5 Sarcopenia is characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and decreased skeletal muscle strength.6 Sarcopenia is a topic of high interest, and several studies have proven that sarcopenia is an indicator of a patient's general health status, such as nutritional and metabolic condition.7, 8, 9, 10 Although sarcopenia is reportedly a prognostic factor in various conditions such as chronic disease and metabolic disease,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 it has not been examined in patients with perforation panperitonitis.

In the present study, we evaluated the presence or absence of sarcopenia simply and objectively with the skeletal muscle index (SMI), indicated by the cross‐sectional area (cm2) of skeletal muscle in the third lumbar vertebra (L3) region on computed tomography (CT) normalized for height (cm2/m2).18 We herein aimed to elucidate the impact of sarcopenia on postoperative complications and mortality in patients with perforation panperitonitis following emergency surgery.

2. METHODS

2.1. Patients

A total of 103 consecutive patients with perforation panperitonitis who underwent emergency surgery from January 2008 to December 2016 at the National Hospital Organization, Beppu Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. The definition of panperitonitis is contaminated ascites in the entire abdominal cavity from upper abdomen to pelvic floor with confirmation of operative record. Patients were excluded from this analysis if they underwent elective operation, were <15 years of age, or had injuries caused by trauma. There was no malignancy in any case. All patients underwent preoperative CT within 1 day of their emergency surgery. A transverse CT image at L3 was assessed on each scan. Cross‐sectional areas (cm2) of skeletal muscle in the L3 region were measured by outlining them on the CT images. The cross‐sectional areas were then normalized for height (cm2/m2) to obtain the skeletal muscle index (SMI).19 Sarcopenia was defined as an SMI of ≤43.75 cm2/m2 for men and ≤41.10 cm2/m2 for women based on previously reported cutoff points.20 The cross‐sectional area of skeletal muscle in the L3 region was measured by two individual researchers (N.K. and S.H.), and no significant difference in the mean value was obtained between them. The software application for sarcopenia evaluation was SYNAPSE Chronical Outlook for Patient's Examination Ver. 2.4.1 (SYNAPSE Enterprise‐PACS, Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan). All preoperative complications were defined as disease with drug treatment. In particular, patients with renal dysfunction had low estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR; <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and were diagnosed with chronic renal dysfunction by a nephrologist or physician before hospitalization.

2.2. Study design

The following variables were compared between the patients with and without sarcopenia: patient demographics, ASA score, site of perforation, duration of hospitalization, postoperative complications, and in‐hospital mortality. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien‐Dindo classification.21 Postoperative complications were defined as grade ≥II complications. Severe postoperative complications were defined as grade ≥IIIb complications (those requiring surgical intervention). The predictive factors were examined with respect to severe complications and in‐hospital mortality.

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Hospital Organization, Beppu Medical Center (2015‐027). It was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and the International Conference on Harmonization of Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test (Mann‐Whitney U‐test). Categorical data were compared using the chi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to control for variables that may confound the effect of sarcopenia on severe postoperative complications and mortality, with all parameters having a P value <.050 on univariate analysis included in a multivariate model. Univariate and multivariate associations are reported as odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine or predict severe complications and in‐hospital mortality. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were compared, and the cutoff levels were determined at an optimized accuracy with equal weight given to sensitivity and specificity errors. A P value of <.050 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were carried out using JMP Pro 12.0 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. RESULTS

Of 103 patients, 50 (48.5%) had sarcopenia. Characteristics of patients with and without sarcopenia are shown in Table 1. Women had a significantly higher rate of sarcopenia than men. Patients with sarcopenia had higher C‐reactive protein (CRP) than those without sarcopenia. Other factors such as age, white blood cell count (WBC), ASA score, preoperative complications except diabetes mellitus, site of perforation, and hospital stay were not related to sarcopenia. Complications (Clavien‐Dindo grade ≥II), severe complications (Clavien‐Dindo grade ≥IIIb) and in‐hospital mortality were more frequently observed in patients with sarcopenia than in those without (68.0% vs 45.3%, P = .019; 28.0% vs 9.4%, P = .015; and 20.0% vs 5.7%, P = .029, respectively). Details of postoperative complications are shown in Table 2. There was no statistical difference between the groups.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with and without sarcopenia

Demographics With sarcopenia (n = 50) Without sarcopenia (n = 53) P value
Age (y) 67.6 ± 17.4 68.6 ± 15.8 .76
Gender
Male 17 (34) 31 (58) .013
Female 33 (66) 22 (42)
Laboratory data
WBC (/mL) 10 162 ± 5539 9086 ± 5878 .342
CRP (mg/dL) 14.7 ± 10.9 10.4 ± 10.7 .046
SMI (cm²/m²) 35.7 ± 4.1 49.4 ± 5.1 <.001
ASA score
1 5 (10) 5 (9) .207
2 14 (28) 8 (15)
3 28 (56) 36 (68)
4 3 (6) 4 (8)
Preoperative complications
Circulatory disease 17 (34) 18 (34) 1
Respiratory disease 5 (10) 7 (13) .634
Liver disease 1 (2) 3 (6) .304
Renal dysfunction 12 (24) 9 (17) .378
Diabetes mellitus 0 (0) 7 (13) .008
Collagen disease 6 (12) 2 (4) .132
Site of perforation
Stomach and duodenum 20 (40) 19 (36) .797
Small bowel and appendix 12 (24) 14 (26) .907
Colon and rectum 17 (34) 16 (30) .806
Biliary tract 0 (0) 3 (6) .079
Uterus abscess 1 (2) 1 (2) 1
Postoperative outcomes
Hospital stay (days) 38.4 ± 33.3 36.4 ± 35.9 .78
Complication (C‐D grade II) 34 (68) 24 (45) .019
Severe complication (C‐D grade IIIb) 14 (28) 5 (9) .015
In‐hospital mortality 10 (20) 3 (6) .029

Normally distributed variables are presented as mean ± SD. Values in parentheses are percentages.

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; C‐D, Clavien‐Dindo classification; CRP, C‐reactive protein; SMI, skeletal muscle index; WBC, white blood cells.

Table 2.

Details of postoperative complications in patients with and without sarcopenia

Factor With sarcopenia (n = 50) Without sarcopenia (n = 53) P valuea
Surgical site infection
Superficial and deep incisional
II 0 3 1
IIIa 7 4
IIIb 0 1
Organ space
II 0 1 .087
IIIa 4 1
IV 1 0
V 2 0
Anastomotic leakage
II 1 0 1
IIIa 1 2
IIIb 1 1
V 1 1
Ileus
II 0 1 .496
IIIa 0 1
Pneumonia
II 2 2 .31
IIIa 1 1
IV 1 0
V 2 0
Pleural effusion
IIIa 1 0 .111
IV 1 0
V 1 0
Atelectasis
IIIa 1 0 .485
Pneumothorax
V 1 0 .485
SIADH
II 0 1 1
Brain infarction
II 1 0 .485
Deep venous thrombosis
IV 2 0 .233
Intra‐abdominal bleeding
IIIa 1 0 .485
Gastrointestinal bleeding
IIIa 1 0 .61
IV 0 1
V 1 0
Gastrointestinal perforation
V 1 0 .485
Enterocolitis
II 0 2 .496
Cholecystitis
II 0 1 1
Spondyloarthritis
IIIa 1 0 .485
Candidemia
II 0 2 1
V 1 0
Septic shock
IIIa 0 2 1
IV 2 1
V 1 0
DIC
II 1 3 .716
IIIa 2 1
V 0 1
Cardiac failure
II 1 1 1
Renal failure
V 1 0 .485
Multiple organ failure
IIIa 0 1 .428
IV 1 0
V 3 1

Complications were graded according to the Clavien‐Dindo classification. Some patients had two or more complications.

DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone.

a

Postoperative complications (Clavien‐Dindo grade ≥II) were compared between the two groups with Fisher's exact test.

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that severe complications were significantly associated with age (OR, 11.72; 95% CI, 2.30‐59.88; P = .003), sarcopenia (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.27‐15.34; P = .020), and renal dysfunction (OR, 5.77; 95% CI, 1.61‐20.73; P = .007) (Table 3). In univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors for in‐hospital mortality were age, sarcopenia, circulatory disease, respiratory disease, and renal dysfunction. Multivariate analysis identified age (OR, 15.07; 95% CI, 1.49‐152.92; P = .022), sarcopenia (OR, 5.43; 95% CI, 1.08‐27.34; P = .040), and renal dysfunction (OR, 13.08; 95% CI, 2.56‐66.76; P = .002) as independent prognostic factors for in‐hospital mortality (Table 4).

Table 3.

Factors associated with severe complications

  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Age 9.35 2.03‐43.03 <.001 11.72 2.30‐59.88 .003
Male 0.61 0.22‐1.71 .35      
WBC 0.8 0.29‐2.19 .664      
CRP 1.41 0.52‐3.83 .497      
Sarcopenia 3.73 1.23‐11.31 .015 4.41 1.27‐15.34 .02
ASA score 1.33 0.43‐4.06 .62      
Preoperative complications
Circulatory disease 2.01 0.73‐5.53 .173      
Respiratory disease 2.53 0.68‐9.50 .157      
Liver disease 0 0‐0 .332      
Renal dysfunction 5.4 1.82‐16.03 .001 5.77 1.61‐20.73 .007
Diabetes mellitus 0 0‐0 .192      
Collagen disease 2.96 0.64‐13.67 .148      
Perforation site
Stomach and duodenum 0.95 0.34‐2.66 .919      
Small bowel and appendix 0.5 0.13‐1.87 .301      
Colon and rectum 2.25 0.81‐6.22 .118      
Biliary tract 0 0‐0 .403      
Uterus abscess 0 0‐0 .497      

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C‐reactive protein, OR, odds ratio; WBC, white blood cells.

Table 4.

Factors associated with mortality

  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Age 12 1.50‐96.19 .004 15.07 1.49‐152.92 .022
Male 0.68 0.21‐2.25 .53      
WBC 1.39 0.43‐4.48 .575      
CRP 3.08 0.88‐10.75 .068      
Sarcopenia 4.67 1.07‐16.16 .029 5.43 1.08‐27.34 .04
ASA score 2.75 0.57‐13.21 .19      
Preoperative complications
Circulatory disease 3.73 1.12‐12.46 .025 1.16 0.23‐5.88 .856
Respiratory disease 4.56 1.14‐18.17 .022 7.51 0.91‐61.76 .061
Liver disease 0 0‐0 .438      
Renal dysfunction 9.48 2.68‐33.49 <.001 13.08 2.56‐66.76 .002
Diabetes mellitus 0 0‐0 .298      
Collagen disease 2.55 0.46‐14.20 .272      
Perforation site
Stomach and duodenum 1.03 0.31‐3.40 .962      
Small bowel and appendix 0.22 0.027‐1.75 .084      
Colon and rectum 2.87 0.88‐9.36 .081      
Biliary tract 0 0‐0 .504      
Uterus abscess 0 0‐0 .587      

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C‐reactive protein, OR, odds ratio; WBC, white blood cells.

Receiver operating characteristic curves for predicting severe complications and optimal cutoff levels for age and sarcopenia were ≥79 years for age (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 77%) and <38 cm2/m2 for SMI (sensitivity, 69%; specificity, 74%), respectively (Figure 1). ROC curves for predicting in‐hospital mortality and optimal cutoff levels for age and sarcopenia were ≥79 years (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 74%) and <38 cm2/m2 for SMI (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 82%), respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses for prediction of severe complications with age and skeletal muscle index (SMI). A, ROC curve analysis shows that an optimal cutoff level of age is >79 y (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 77%). Area under the ROC curve is 0.76. B, ROC curve analysis shows that an optimal cutoff level of SMI is <38 cm2/m2 (sensitivity, 69%; specificity, 74%). Area under the ROC curve is 0.74

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses for prediction of in‐hospital mortality with age and skeletal muscle index (SMI). A, ROC curve analysis shows that an optimal cutoff level of age is >79 y (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 74%). Area under the ROC curve is 0.78. B, ROC curve analysis shows that an optimal cutoff level of SMI is <38 cm2/m2 (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 82%). Area under the ROC curve is 0.78

Distributions of age and SMI in patients with and without severe complications and mortality are indicated in Figure 3. If an age of ≥79 years and an SMI of <38 cm2/m2 were used as the thresholds to predict severe complications and in‐hospital mortality, the rate of severe complications was 71% (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 96%) and the rate of in‐hospital mortality was 57% (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 94%).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Distribution of age and skeletal muscle index (SMI) in patients with or without severe complications (A) and in‐hospital mortality (B). If age ≥79 y and SMI <38 cm2/m2 were used as the thresholds to predict severe complications (A) and in‐hospital mortality (B), the rate of severe complications was 71% (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 96%) and the rate of in‐hospital mortality was 57% (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 94%). Thresholds of 79 y and 38 cm2/m2 are indicated by solid lines

4. DISCUSSION

Sarcopenia, characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and decreased skeletal muscle strength, have proven to represent the general health status of patients.7, 8, 9, 10 The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People recommends defining sarcopenia by both loss of muscle volume and decreased muscle function.6 Although sarcopenia is associated with aging, it can also develop as a consequence of chronic disease or malignancy. For this reason, many definitions of sarcopenia have been established for various target cohorts such as ethnic groups and age groups.22 In the emergency setting, skeletal muscle function is difficult to evaluate and, thus, in the present study, muscle mass determined by CT images was measured. CT images, which are feasible in the emergency setting and completely objective, are usually carried out preoperatively for all patients with perforation panperitonitis. Because adjustment of skeletal muscle volume using body weight and body surface area23 is difficult in the emergency setting, we judged that using body height only was appropriate in the present study.

In the present study, sarcopenia was determined using SMI cutoff levels specific to each gender (≤43.75 and ≤41.10 cm2/m2 for men and women, respectively), based on a previous report with Japanese patients.20 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models identified sarcopenia as an independent predictor of severe complications and in‐hospital mortality. When we examined the optimal cutoff of SMI for predicting severe complications and in‐hospital mortality, the optimal cutoffs of SMI were <38 cm2/m2 for both severe complications and mortality, regardless of gender. Using the common cutoff for both genders is simple and beneficial when preparing for emergency surgery. In patients with severe sarcopenia, as indicated by SMI <38 cm2/m2, the rates of complications, severe complications and in‐hospital mortality were 76%, 35% and 26%, respectively (Table S1).

Between 2000 and 2050, the world's population aged over 60 years will expand from 11% to 20%.19 Especially in Japan, the population aged over 65 years had already exceed 25% in 2015 and is expected to account for 38% of the population in 2050. Surgical procedures are thus being increasingly carried out in elderly patients. A prospective study with 4315 elective noncardiac procedures reported that elderly patients were at increasing risk of postoperative complications and in‐hospital mortality; the rates of postoperative complications and in‐hospital mortality in patients aged ≥80 years were 12.5% and 2.6%, respectively, and even in patients aged ≥80 years, in‐hospital mortality was low.24 A retrospective study with of 593 abdominal emergency surgeries showed that 30 day‐mortality and 90 day‐mortality were 10% and 17%, respectively, and that age was an independent risk factor of mortality.25 The present cohort with perforation panperitonitis indicated that age was an independent predictive factor of both severe complications and in‐hospital mortality and that patients aged ≥79 years, as an optimal cutoff, had severe complications of 43.8% and in‐hospital mortality of 31.3%. The age effect on morbidity and mortality may be more pronounced in emergency surgery, especially for perforation panperitonitis, than in elective surgery. In addition, because of the wide heterogeneity of general health status and the scarcity of objective tools for predicting operative risks, surgical decision‐making for emergency surgery is challenging in elderly patients. In the present study, among the patients aged ≥79 years, those with SMI <38 cm2/m2 had a severe complication rate of 71% and an in‐hospital mortality rate of 57%, whereas those with SMI ≥38 cm2/m2 had a severe complication rate of 22% (P = .011) and an in‐hospital mortality rate of 11% (P = .008). Among the patients aged <79 years, those with SMI <38 cm2/m2 had a severe complication rate of 15% and an in‐hospital mortality rate of 5%, and those with SMI ≥38 cm2/m2 had a severe complication rate of 4% (P = .132) and an in‐hospital mortality rate of 4% (P = 1.000). In a previous study of emergency abdominal surgery, sarcopenia significantly predicted mortality in univariate analysis but lost significance in multivariate analysis when factors such as age and ASA were included.25 In that study, the mean age was 61 years, but in the present study, it was 68 years and with 32 (33%) of the 103 patients aged ≥79 years. The impact of sarcopenia on surgical outcomes following emergency surgery may be less in younger patients than in elderly patients. Estimation of sarcopenia using SMI by CT images is thus likely to discriminate patients eligible or not eligible for emergency surgery among elderly patients with perforation panperitonitis.

Patients with sarcopenia had a higher incidence of complications and severe complications than those without sarcopenia. Postoperative complications observed in the present study may have been caused by a lack of multiple skeletal muscle functions. Skeletal muscle was recently identified as an endocrine organ and associated with immune regulation, glucose disposal, and protein synthesis.26, 27 Glutamine, an important nutrient for the integrity of the intestinal wall, is mainly synthesized in skeletal muscle. Sarcopenia is associated with reduced glutamine production, leading to intestinal dysfunction and infectious complications.10 Cytokine interleukin‐6 is secreted from skeletal muscle, promotes muscle hypertrophy, and enhances insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake. Sarcopenia may result in glucose intolerance because >75% of glucose is managed by skeletal muscle.7, 8, 9, 10 A high blood glucose concentration is associated with delayed wound healing and infectious complications.28, 29 These factors may be related to a higher tendency of surgical site infection of the organ space and pneumonia after emergency surgery in patients with sarcopenia, although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the present study. In addition, respiratory complications were found more frequently in 11 (50%) patients with sarcopenia compared with three (6%) patients without sarcopenia (P = .021). Sarcopenia has been reported as a risk factor for pneumonia because of poor chewing and swallowing function, delayed mobilization, dysphagia, or difficulty in clearing the airway.30

Although the present study has several limitations because of its retrospective design and small number of patients, we believe that sarcopenia is a predictive factor of severe complications and in‐hospital mortality following emergency surgery for perforation panperitonitis, especially in elderly patients. Estimation of sarcopenia using CT images and body height is simple and objective, and therefore convenient for the emergency setting. Rates of severe complications and in‐hospital mortality were extremely high in patients aged ≥79 years and with SMI <38 cm2/m2, but even in patients aged ≥79 years, those with SMI ≥38 cm2/m2 had better surgical outcomes. Estimation of sarcopenia is likely to identify patients eligible for emergency surgery among elderly patients with perforation panperitonitis. Evaluation of sarcopenia may identify patients susceptible to surgical stress and it may lead to the development of tailored preventive strategies and allocation of medical resources in the coming aging society.

DISCLOSURE

Conflicts of Interest: Authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

Supporting information

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Kubo N, Kawanaka H, Hiroshige S, et al. Sarcopenia discriminates poor prognosis in elderly patients following emergency surgery for perforation panperitonitis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3:630–637. 10.1002/ags3.12281

REFERENCES

  • 1. Han EC, Ryoo SB, Park BK, Park JW, Lee SY, Oh HK, et al. Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of emergency surgery for colonic perforation: would fecal contamination increase morbidity and mortality? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1495–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sharma R, Ranjan V, Jain S, Joshi T, Tyagi A, Chaphekar R. A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6:S49–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Miyazaki N, Haga Y, Matsukawa H, Ishimura T, Fujita M, Ejima T, et al. Development and validation of the Calculation of post‐Operative Risk in Emergency Surgery (CORES) model. Surg Today. 2014;44:1443–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:355–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rosenberg I. Summary comments: epidemiological and methodological problems in determining nutritional status of older persons. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50:1231–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Brandt C, Pedersen BK. The role of exercise‐induced myokines in muscle homeostasis and the defense against chronic diseases. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:520258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Blanc S, Normand S, Pachiaudi C, Fortrat JO, Laville M, Gharib C. Fuel homeostasis during physical inactivity induced by bed rest. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2223–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mikines KJ, Richter EA, Dela F, Galbo H. Seven days of bed rest decrease insulin action on glucose uptake in leg and whole body. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70:1245–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Biolo G, Zorat F, Antonione R, Ciocchi B. Muscle glutamine depletion in the intensive care unit. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37:2169–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Du Y, Karvellas CJ, Baracos V, Williams DC, Khadaroo RG, Acute Care and Emergency Surgery (ACES) Group . Sarcopenia is a predictor of outcomes in very elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Surgery. 2014;156:521–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Moisey LL, Mourtzakis M, Cotton BA, Premji T, Heyland DK, Wade CE, et al. Skeletal muscle predicts ventilator‐free days, ICU‐free days, and mortality in elderly ICU patients. Crit Care. 2013;17:R206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Masuda T, Shirabe K, Ikegami T, Harimoto N, Yoshizumi T, Soejima Y, et al. Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:401–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Fukuda Y, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, Nishikawa K, Nagatsuma Y, Nakayama T, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with severe postoperative complications in elderly gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:986–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tan BH, Birdsell LA, Martin L, Baracos VE, Fearon KC. Sarcopenia in an overweight or obese patient is an adverse prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6973–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. van Vledder MG, Levolger S, Ayez N, Verhoef C, Tran TC, Ijzermans JN. Body composition and outcome in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2012;99:550–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sabel MS, Lee J, Cai S, Englesbe MJ, Holcombe S, Wang S. Sarcopenia as a prognostic factor among patients with stage III melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3579–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St‐Onge MP, Albu J, et al. Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross‐sectional image. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97:2333–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. WHO . Facts about ageing. 2014. Available at: http://www.who.int/ageing/about/facts/en/. Accessed March 15, 2016.
  • 20. Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Yamashita YI, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Soejima Y, et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of prognosis in patients following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1523–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:997–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Akahoshi T, Yasuda M, Momii K, Kubota K, Shono Y, Kaku N, et al. Sarcopenia is a predictive factor for prolonged intensive care unit stays in high‐energy blunt trauma patients. Acute Med Surg. 2016;3:326–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Polanczyk CA, Marcantonio E, Goldman L, Rohde LE, Orav J, Mangione CM, et al. Impact of age on perioperative complications and length of stay in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:637–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Dirks RC, Edwards BL, Tong E, Schaheen B, Turrentine FE, Shada A, et al. Sarcopenia in emergency abdominal surgery. J Surg Res. 2017;207:13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lightfoot A, McArdle A, Griffiths RD. Muscle in defense. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:S384–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gruther W, Benesch T, Zorn C, Paternostro‐Sluga T, Quittan M, Fialka‐Moser V, et al. Muscle wasting in intensive care patients: ultrasound observation of the M. quadriceps femoris muscle layer. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:185–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sivrikoz E, Karamanos E, Beale E, Teixeira P, Inaba K, Demetriades D. The effect of diabetes on outcomes following emergency appendectomy in patients without comorbidities: a propensity score‐matched analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Am J Surg. 2015;209:206–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lieffers JR, Bathe OF, Fassbender K, Winget M, Baracos VE. Sarcopenia is associated with postoperative infection and delayed recovery from colorectal cancer resection surgery. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:931–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ida S, Watanabe M, Yoshida N, Baba Y, Umezaki N, Harada K, et al. Sarcopenia is a predictor of postoperative respiratory complications in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4432–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 


Articles from Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES