Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 2019 Oct 22;129(12):5169–5186. doi: 10.1172/JCI129761

P2Y6 signaling in alveolar macrophages prevents leukotriene-dependent type 2 allergic lung inflammation

Jun Nagai 1,2, Barbara Balestrieri 1,2, Laura B Fanning 1,2, Timothy Kyin 1,2, Haley Cirka 2, Junrui Lin 2, Marco Idzko 3, Andreas Zech 3, Edy Y Kim 1,4, Patrick J Brennan 1,2, Joshua A Boyce 1,2,5
PMCID: PMC6877315  PMID: 31638598

Abstract

Antagonists of the type 1 cysteinyl leukotriene receptor (CysLT1R) are widely used to treat asthma and allergic rhinitis, with variable response rates. Alveolar macrophages express UDP-specific P2Y6 receptors that can be blocked by off-target effects of CysLT1R antagonists. Sensitizing intranasal doses of an extract from the house dust mite Dermatophagoides farinae (Df) sharply increased the levels of UDP detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of mice. Conditional deletion of P2Y6 receptors before sensitization exacerbated eosinophilic lung inflammation and type 2 cytokine production in response to subsequent Df challenge. P2Y6 receptor signaling was necessary for dectin-2–dependent production of protective IL-12p40 and Th1 chemokines by alveolar macrophages, leading to activation of NK cells to generate IFN-γ. Administration of CysLT1R antagonists during sensitization blocked UDP-elicited potentiation of IL-12p40 production by macrophages in vitro, suppressed the Df-induced production of IL-12p40 and IFN-γ in vivo, and suppressed type 2 inflammation only in P2Y6-deficient mice. Thus, P2Y6 receptor signaling drives an innate macrophage/IL-12/NK cell/IFN-γ axis that prevents inappropriate allergic type 2 immune responses on respiratory allergen exposure and counteracts the Th2 priming effect of CysLT1R signaling at sensitization. Targeting P2Y6 signaling might prove to be a potential additional treatment strategy for allergy.

Keywords: Immunology, Pulmonology

Keywords: Asthma


graphic file with name jci-129-129761-g416.jpg

Introduction

Type 2 immunity (T2I) mediates host defense against helminthic parasites (1) and facilitates epithelial barrier repair (2). If dysregulated or directed against innocuous antigens (allergens), T2I can also promote persistent eosinophilic inflammation and disease. Allergens in house dust mites (HDMs), fungi, and pollens carry endogenous adjuvants (endotoxin, lipids, proteases, and glycans) that activate barrier cells and antigen-presenting cells through pattern recognition receptors (3, 4). This innate response bridges to adaptive T2I involving effector and memory T cells, antigen-specific IgE, and the production of the type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (5). T2I to allergens is strongly associated with increasingly prevalent diseases such as asthma, rhinosinusitis, and allergic esophagitis, each of which involves end-organ dysfunction and remodeling due to T2I-dependent immunopathology (68). Recent studies using cytokine-targeted therapies and anti-IgE validate the importance of the pathologic processes regulated by T2I in these diseases (9, 10). Checking the destructive potential of T2I requires the presence of mechanisms that ensure that the initial innate response to allergens is tightly regulated and compartmentalized. The basis of this regulation remains incompletely understood but likely involves components of the innate immune response that control the magnitude of subsequent T2I responses.

In addition to exogenous adjuvants, endogenous danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (lipids, cytokines, and other extracellular signaling molecules) help to bridge innate to adaptive immunity. DAMPs derive from tissue-resident cells or recruited myeloid cells early following exposure to antigens (3, 11). They fine-tune signal strength and production of canonical cytokines by antigen-presenting cells, thus shaping instructions received by lymphoid effectors. Cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) are arachidonic acid–derived mediators generated by mast cells, eosinophils, DCs, and macrophages. In addition to their role as bronchoconstrictors in asthma (12, 13), they act as DAMPs that facilitate T2I through effects on DCs (3) and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) (14). These effects are mediated by the type 1 receptor for the cysLTs (CysLT1R), a GPCR that is the target for the widely prescribed drugs montelukast, zafirlukast, and pranlukast. The therapeutic efficacy of these drugs for the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis varies, with as few as 24% to as many as 78% of patients failing to show symptomatic improvement (15, 16). The reasons for this variable response are not clear but may involve individual variation in the contributions from cysLTs to T2I (17), as well as potential off-target effects of the drugs at receptors that exert a protective role (18).

The purinergic receptor (P2Y) class of GPCRs is a potential unintended target of CysLT1R antagonists. P2Y receptors recognize extracellular nucleotides (19), are structurally homologous to CysLT1R (20), and are blocked in vitro by CysLT1R antagonists (21). P2Y receptors, along with nucleotide-selective ion channels (P2X receptors), mediate DAMP-like effects of nucleotides in T2I. ATP is released at high levels in the airways of asthmatic subjects challenged with allergen (22). ATP primes lung DCs to promote T2I to the innocuous experimental antigen ovalbumin (22) and acts at P2Y2 receptors on respiratory epithelial cells to induce the release of IL-33, a T2I-promoting alarmin (4). Less is understood about the roles of UTP and UDP (23), the latter of which preferentially binds P2Y6 receptors (24). P2Y6 receptors are expressed by bronchial epithelial cells during pathologic mucosal inflammation (25, 26) and are also expressed strongly and constitutively by monocytes, macrophages, and DCs (27) (http://rstats.immgen.org/Skyline/skyline.html). Because P2Y6 receptors exhibit the highest affinity (nM range) (28) of all P2Y receptors for their cognate ligand, these cells may be highly sensitive to changes in the local levels of UDP. P2Y6 receptor signaling facilitates proinflammatory chemokine and cytokine production through both autocrine and paracrine circuits in several cell types ex vivo (26, 29, 30), but its role in T2I is unclear. Selective P2Y6 receptor blockade decreases allergen-induced lung eosinophil counts and type 2 cytokine production in immunologically sensitized mice (26). In contrast, induced deletion of P2Y6 receptors markedly enhances pulmonary T2I responses of mice to repetitive inhalation challenges with an extract (Df) of the clinically important HDM Dermatophagoides farinea (31), and a selective P2Y6 receptor agonist prevented the development of airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in a mouse asthma model (32). These studies suggest a complex, context-specific function of UDP and P2Y6 receptors that may either protect from or promote T2I in the lung.

In this study, we sought to identify key steps and cell types responsible for the protective effect of P2Y6 receptors and their preferred ligand, UDP, in pulmonary T2I; to resolve the potentially contradictory effects of P2Y6 receptor signaling in different models of allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation; and to determine the potential consequences of P2Y6 receptor blockade by CysLT1R antagonists in vivo. We uncover a major role of UDP/P2Y6 receptor signaling in controlling a previously unrecognized protective function of alveolar macrophages (AMs). This function was mediated by IL-12–dependent activation of an innate, NK cell–dependent IFN response that dampened subsequent Df-induced T2I. We also demonstrate that the protective P2Y6 response is blocked by antagonists of CysLT1R in vivo and counterbalances the established pro-T2I role of CysLT1R signaling at sensitization (33).

Results

Deletion of P2Y6 at sensitization, but not at challenge, amplifies pulmonary type 2 responses to Df.

P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, which were generated from P2ry6fl/fl and Rosa26-CreERT2 mice, display increased T2I and associated eosinophilic pulmonary inflammation compared with P2ry6fl/fl/+/+ (+/+) controls when subjected to repetitive administration of low-dose (3 μg) Df over a 3-week period (31). To distinguish the potential contributions of UDP and P2Y6 receptors to the respective sensitization and effector steps of the Df-induced T2I, we modified the protocol to incorporate distinct sensitization and challenge phases (Figure 1A). Both +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice were treated with tamoxifen daily i.p. for 5 days, beginning 14 days before the first Df exposure, to delete the P2ry6 allele prior to sensitization. Mice received sensitizing i.n. doses (20 μg) of Df on successive days (days 0 and 1), followed by challenges with low-dose Df (3 μg) on days 14 and 15, or they received equal volumes of NaCl. BAL fluid and tissues were collected 16 hours after the last challenge dose. Tamoxifen induced 80%–90% deletion of the P2ry6 transcript in the lung, spleen, BM, paratracheal lymph nodes, and BAL fluid cells of the P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129761DS1). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) of AMs (CD11c+ BAL fluid cells) sorted from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice demonstrated an 84% decrease in expression of the floxed P2Y6 (exon 3) allele, indicating that more than 80% recombination had occurred (Supplemental Figure 1B). BM-derived macrophages (BMMs) from +/+ mice showed marked dose-dependent increases in intracellular calcium levels in response to stimulation with UDP that were attenuated in macrophages derived from the BMs of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Supplemental Figure 1C). Both BMMs and DCs and from +/+ mice displayed rapid decreases (3 hours) in P2ry6 mRNA expression in response to stimulation with Df (Supplemental Figure 1D).

Figure 1. Deletion of P2Y6 before, but not after, sensitization amplifies allergic lung inflammation induced by challenge with Df.

Figure 1

(A) Protocol to induce allergic airway inflammation after deletion of P2Y6 by tamoxifen treatment. (B) Total/differential cell counts in BAL fluid of NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ (blue bars; n = 17, n = 29) and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ (Cre/+, red bars; n = 18, n = 27) mice on day 16. Data are from 5 experiments. (C) Representative lung tissue sections from NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice stained with H&E on day 16. Scale bar: 300 µm. (D and E) BAL fluid levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (D) and total serum IgE and IgG2c (E) in NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ (n = 17, n = 29) and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ (n = 18, n = 27) mice on day 16. (F) Protocol used to induce allergic inflammation with deletion of P2Y6 after the sensitization phase. (G) BAL fluid cell counts of NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ (n = 3, n = 7) and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ (n = 3, n = 10) mice on day 16 when P2ry6 was deleted after the sensitization phase. (H and I) BAL fluid levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (H) and total serum IgE and IgG2c (I) in NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice when P2ry6 was deleted after the sensitization phase. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 vs. +/+ mice by 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test.

To determine whether the deletion of P2Y6 receptors prior to sensitization enhanced Df-induced T2I in the modified protocol, we examined BAL fluid for cell counts and mediators on day 16 (16 hours after the second challenge dose of Df) and for type 2 cytokines. Whereas Df-sensitized and -challenged +/+ mice displayed minimal to negligible BAL fluid eosinophilia and neutrophilia, P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice showed significant increases in BAL fluid total cell, eosinophil, neutrophil, and AM/lymphocyte counts (Figure 1B). The level of BAL fluid eosinophilia observed in +/+ mice in this Df protocol (2 sensitizing doses followed by 2 challenges 14 days later) was lower than that induced by the repetitive Df protocol used in the previous study (6 i.n. doses over 18 days) (31). H&E-stained lung sections revealed negligible bronchovascular cellular infiltrates in Df-treated +/+ controls but substantial infiltrates in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Figure 1C). Levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were higher in BAL fluid of Df-sensitized and -challenged P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice than +/+ controls (Figure 1D and Supplemental Figure 2A). qPCR revealed significantly greater expression of Il4, Il5, and Il13 mRNA by lungs of Df-treated P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice than +/+ controls; and of Il33, and the goblet cell transcript Clca3, as well as Epx (encoding EPO) and Rnase2 (consistent with the presence of eosinophils); but not of Tslp and Il25 (Supplemental Figure 2, B and C). Serum levels of total IgE rose in both the Df-sensitized and -challenged P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice and +/+ controls (they tended to be higher in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice; median +/+ Df: 1.32 μg/mL n = 29, P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ Df: 2.76 μg/mL n = 27), whereas IgG2c (a Th1-related antibody isotype in C57BL/6 mice) increased only in the Df-challenged +/+ mice, and IgM levels did not change (Figure 1E and Supplemental Figure 2D). Whole-lung Ifng mRNA expression levels and BAL fluid IFN-γ levels were similarly low in the Df- and NaCl-treated mice, and did not differ between strains (Supplemental Figure 2E). The enhanced type 2 cytokine (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) production reflected increased numbers of cytokine-expressing T cells (CD3+CD90+) in BAL fluids and higher levels of the corresponding transcripts in the T cell compartment (CD3+CD90+CD45+) of the lungs. In contrast, there were no differences between strains in the cytokines generated by ILCs (LinCD90+CD45+) (Supplemental Figure 3, A–C).

To determine whether P2Y6 receptor signaling protected against T2I-mediated inflammation when P2ry6 deletion was restricted to the challenge phase, we delayed administration of tamoxifen to the mice to 24 hours after the second sensitizing dose of Df (Figure 1F). We verified deletion of P2ry6 in the lung and spleen by qPCR in this protocol (Supplemental Figure 4A). In marked contrast to the deletion of P2ry6 prior to sensitization, deletion after the sensitization significantly decreased Df-induced accumulation of eosinophils in BAL fluid (Figure 1G). Additionally, levels of IL-5 and quantities of Il4, Il5, Il13, and Il33 transcripts were significantly diminished in the BAL and lungs of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice compared with +/+ controls after delayed tamoxifen administration (Figure 1H and Supplemental Figure 4B). Total IgE, IgG2c, and IgM levels were similar in the 2 genotypes in this protocol and not significantly increased by Df challenge (Figure 1I and Supplemental Figure 4C). Levels of mRNA encoding Cxcl1 and Il6 (each of which is generated by airway epithelial cells activated by P2Y6 signaling) (26) were significantly lower in the lungs of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice than +/+ controls when P2ry6 deletion was restricted to the challenge phase (Supplemental Figure 5A). In contrast, these transcripts did not differ between strains when P2ry6 was deleted before sensitization (Supplemental Figure 5B). These data demonstrated that P2Y6 signaling during the allergen sensitization phase was critical for its ability to decrease T2I-mediated inflammation at the challenge phase.

P2Y6 expression by hematopoietic cells protects against Df-induced T2I.

To identify specific cell types potentially responsible for the protective effect of P2Y6 receptor signaling during sensitization, we applied the sensitization and challenge protocol to 2 additional strains of conditional null mice: P2ry6fl/fl Scgb1a1-Cre/+ mice, in which deletion of P2ry6 is driven by an epithelial (Clara) cell–specific promoter; and P2ry6fl/fl Cd4-Cre/+ mice, in which P2ry6 is deleted selectively on T cells at the double-positive thymocyte stage; along with respective control strains. Compared with the corresponding +/+ controls, neither conditional null strain showed significant differences in total BAL fluid cell counts or any specific cell subset (Figure 2, A and B). To determine whether hematopoietic or tissue-resident expression of P2Y6 mediated the protective effect of the receptor during sensitization, we transferred BM from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice into lethally irradiated +/+ controls and vice versa, and subjected the engrafted mice to the Df sensitization and challenge protocol (Figure 2C). Both +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ recipients of BM from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice showed higher BAL fluid total cell and eosinophil counts than did recipients of +/+ BM (Figure 2C). qPCR analysis of the engrafted mice confirmed the repopulation of recipient BM with the donor genotype. Additionally, transferred BM accounted for approximately 80% of the P2ry6 transcripts in the lung of Df-sensitized and -challenged mice, indicating replenishment of P2Y6 receptors expressed by radiosensitive hematopoietic cell populations resident in the lung (Figure 2C). Epx transcript levels in the lungs of recipients of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ marrow were increased compared with those in recipients of +/+ BM (Figure 2C). We concluded from these experiments that the regulatory effect of P2Y6 signaling was mediated by a hematopoietic non–T cell.

Figure 2. P2Y6 receptors on hematopoietic cells are involved in protection from Df-induced allergic inflammation.

Figure 2

(A) BAL fluid cell counts of NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ (blue bars; n = 8, n = 11) and P2ry6fl/fl Scgb1a1-Cre/+ (red bars; n = 3 , n = 14) mice on day 16. (B) BAL fluid cell counts of NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ (n = 6, n = 13) and P2ry6fl/fl Cd4-Cre/+ (n = 5, n = 15) mice on day 16. (C) BAL fluid cell counts of chimeric mice. Lethally irradiated mice of the indicated genotypes received i.v. marrow from mice of the indicated genotypes (10–14 mice/group). P2ry6 transcripts in BM and lung tissue and Epx transcript in lung tissue from chimeric mice on day 16, as measured by qPCR. Data are expressed as ratio relative to Gapdh. Values are mean ± SEM. All data are from 2 experiments. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 vs. indicated mice receiving +/+ BM by Mann-Whitney U test, parametric t test, or Welch’s t test (C).

Early production of IL-12 depends on P2Y6 receptor signaling.

We next sought to further characterize the early P2Y6 receptor–dependent events responsible for the dampened type 2 immune responses during sensitization. We examined BAL fluid from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice and +/+ controls for the presence of cytokines produced by resident hematopoietic cells during innate immune responses that regulate subsequent adaptive responses after administration of tamoxifen and a sensitizing dose of Df (Figure 3A). We measured IL-12p40, a subunit of both the Th1-promoting factor IL-12 and the Th17-promoting factor IL-23, during the sensitization phase. We also examined the BAL fluid for IL-23 (using an ELISA with an IL-12p19 capture antibody and an IL-12p40 detection antibody); IL-18, which can facilitate type 1 cytokine production (34); and IL-10, which is immunoregulatory. IL-12p40 levels in the BAL fluid tended to increase as early as 3 hours after the first sensitizing dose of Df in +/+ but not P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, reaching a peak on day 2 (16 hours after the second sensitizing dose) and declining thereafter (Figure 3, B and C). Such an increase in BAL fluid IL-12p40 levels did not occur in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Figure 3C). Serum levels of IL-12p40 were equivalent in the 2 strains and not altered by sensitization to Df (Figure 3C), and whole-lung Il12b transcripts were modestly reduced in the P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice relative to +/+ controls. IL-12p70, IL-23, and IL-10 levels were below the limit of detection in the BAL fluid (data not shown). IL-12p70 levels in lung homogenates were similarly low in Df- and NaCl-treated mice, and did not differ between strains (Supplemental Figure 6A). Df treatment induced modest and equivalent increases in BAL fluid levels of IL-18 in both strains on day 2, without significant changes in serum IL-18 levels or Il18 mRNA expression in the lungs (Supplemental Figure 6B).

Figure 3. P2Y6 receptors regulate early alveolar IL-12 production.

Figure 3

(A) Schematic of BAL and serum collection during the sensitization phase to assess levels of IL-12p40 and UDP and BAL fluid cell counts. (B) Time course of IL-12p40 production in BAL fluid from Df-treated WT mice (n = 3). (C) IL-12p40 production in BAL fluid and serum from NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ (blue bars) and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ (red bars) mice; and Il12b transcript in the lung of NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 2. (D) P2Y6 activity (UDP concentrations) on days 0 (3 hours), 2, and 7 in BAL fluid was quantified by bioassay using 1321N1 cells stably expressing mouse P2Y6. (E) BAL fluid cell counts of NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 2. Values are mean ± SEM. Data are from at least 2 experiments, except for the time course experiment on IL-12p40 (B) and P2Y6 activity on day 7 (D, right panel). #P < 0.05, ###P < 0.001 vs. NaCl treatment; ####P < 0.0001 vs. day 0 (B) or NaCl treatment (C); **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. +/+ mice; by 1-way (B) or 2-way (C and E) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test or nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparisons test (D).

To quantify the levels of extracellular UDP in the alveolar space, we developed a P2Y6 receptor–dependent calcium flux bioassay in stably transfected mouse P2Y6-expressing 1321N1 cells capable of detecting UDP in BAL fluid at levels as low as 0.2 nM. Both UDP and BAL fluid induced calcium fluxes in P2Y6-transfected cells, but not parental 1321N1 cells, that were prevented by treatment with apyrase (Supplemental Figure 7, A–C). Among the 4 nucleotides, UTP and ADP showed more than 30 and 300 times lower affinity, respectively, to mouse P2Y6 than UDP (Supplemental Figure 7D). In mice of both genotypes, the first sensitizing dose of Df increased UDP activity in BAL fluid collected compared with the NaCl-challenged controls as early as 3 hours (Figure 3D). These increases persisted on day 2, then declined by day 7 to basal levels (Figure 3D). BAL fluid UDP levels in the Df-treated P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice were indistinguishable from those in +/+ controls at 3 hours and day 2, but were higher in the P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 16 in both the before-sensitization and delayed-tamoxifen protocols (Supplemental Figure 7E). Total cell counts and neutrophils in the BAL fluid on day 2 increased in +/+ but not P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Figure 3E). We concluded from these experiments that the release of IL-12p40 during the sensitization phase coincided with the release of UDP, as well as a small influx of neutrophils, and that IL-12p40 release and neutrophil influx both depended on P2Y6 signaling.

To determine whether the P2Y6 receptor–dependent differences in BAL fluid IL-12p40 levels persisted at the challenge phase, we measured IL-12p40 levels in samples from NaCl- and Df-challenged mice on day 16. Compared with NaCl-challenged controls, BAL fluid from Df-challenged mice showed markedly increased levels of IL-12p40, but with no significant differences between strains (Supplemental Figure 8). Thus, P2Y6 receptor signaling was essential for the early production of IL-12p40 but not for its production after sensitization and when airway inflammation was established.

We next asked whether IL-12 production at the sensitization phase conveyed the protective effect of P2Y6 receptor signaling at the challenge phase. To test this hypothesis, we administered exogenous recombinant IL-12p70 (500 ng/mouse) i.n. to both +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on 4 successive days beginning on the first day of the sensitization phase (Figure 4A). IL-12p40 levels in BAL fluid from the IL-12p70–treated WT mice (248 ± 31 pg/mL) were similar to those detected in Df-sensitized WT mice (217 ± 23 pg/mL) (Figure 4A). On day 16, IL-12p70–treated P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice showed decreased BAL fluid total cell and eosinophil, but not neutrophil, numbers compared with sensitized and challenged P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice that did not receive IL-12p70 (Figure 4B). Exogenous IL-12p70 did not alter total or differential BAL fluid cell counts in Df-challenged +/+ mice compared with control mice not receiving IL-12p70. Epx transcript levels in the lungs of IL-12p70–treated Df-challenged P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice were sharply reduced compared with those of their counterparts that did not receive IL-12p70 (Figure 4C). Furthermore, IL-12p70 administration tended to increase serum levels of IgG2c in the Df-challenged P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice to levels comparable to those observed in +/+ controls (Figure 4D). From these experiments, we concluded that IL-12 generated at sensitization was necessary for P2Y6 receptor–dependent control of type 2 immunopathology and IgG2c production at challenge.

Figure 4. Restoration of IL-12 reverses eosinophilic lung inflammation in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice.

Figure 4

(A) Intranasal administration of IL-12p70 (500 ng) for 4 days on early stages prevents enhanced eosinophilic lung inflammation in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice. IL-12p40 levels in BAL fluid from i.n. Df-sensitized or IL-12p70–treated WT mice on day 2: vehicle, 44 ± 6 pg/mL; Df: 217 ± 2 mL; IL-12p70: 248 ± 3 pg/mL (n = 4). (B) BAL fluid cell counts of Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice that receive vehicle (Veh) or recombinant IL-12p70 (+/+ Veh: n = 14, +/+ IL-12: n = 11, P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ Veh: n = 17, P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ IL-12: n = 15). (C) Epx transcript in the lung tissue of Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice that received vehicle or recombinant IL-12p70. (D) Total serum IgG2c from Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice that received vehicle or recombinant IL-12p70. Values are mean ± SEM. Data are from 3 experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle by Mann-Whitney U test.

AMs are the dominant source of P2Y6-regulated IL-12.

To identify the cellular source(s) of UDP/P2Y6 receptor–dependent IL-12p40 production, we analyzed cells from both BAL fluid and enzymatically dispersed lungs for intracellular IL-12p40 protein by flow cytometry. Samples were collected from +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice before and 4 and 8 hours after the first and second sensitizations with Df. The cells were permeabilized and stained with mAbs against specific lineage markers and IL-12p40, respectively. Before sensitization, approximately 95% of BAL fluid cells in both +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice were CD68+ macrophages, of which approximately 30% expressed IL-12p40 (Figure 5A). The percentages of CD68+ macrophages expressing IL-12p40 in +/+ mice increased by approximately 60% by 4 hours after the second sensitizing dose of Df and remained higher than in NaCl-treated controls to day 2 (24 hours after the second sensitizing dose) (Supplemental Figure 9A and Figure 5A), while the percentages of IL-12p40lo/neg CD68+ cells decreased. The percentage of CD68+ cells expressing IL-12p40+ did not increase significantly in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice in response to Df (Figure 5A, top row). All of the IL-12p40+CD68+ cells expressed CD11c (Figure 5A, middle row), consistent with their identity as AMs. At 4 hours after the second sensitizing dose, Df caused an influx of Ly6G+ neutrophils and Ly6G lymphocyte-sized cells into the BAL fluid of +/+ but not P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, both of which were negative for IL-12p40 (Figure 5A, bottom row). Single-cell suspensions of dispersed lungs contained interstitial macrophages (CD45+CD24CD11b+CD11c+) that were IL-12p40 negative (Figure 5B). The eosinophils (CD45+CD24+Siglec F+) and neutrophils (CD45+CD24+Siglec FCD11cCD11b+) present in small numbers in the lungs after Df sensitization were autofluorescent, and the IL-12p40–positive plasmacytoid DCs (CD45+CD24+Siglec FCD11c+) did not differ between +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Figure 5B). CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes (CD45+CCR2+Ly6C+), which showed higher levels of P2ry6 transcript than BAL fluid cells, infiltrated into the lung after the second sensitizing dose of Df, but they were negative for IL-12p40 (Supplemental Figure 9, B and C).

Figure 5. AMs are the predominant sources of P2Y6-regulated IL-12p40.

Figure 5

(A) BAL fluid cells obtained 4 hours after the second dose of NaCl (left) or Df (+/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+). Staining of the CD45+ gate for CD68 and intracellular IL-12p40 is shown in the top row. Surface CD11c staining of CD45+CD68+ cells and surface Ly6G staining of CD45+CD68 cells are displayed in the middle and bottom rows, respectively. Quantifications are shown in the bar graphs (+/+ Veh: n = 5, +/+ Df: n = 12, and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ Df: n = 11). (B) Cells were isolated from digested lungs. Analysis of IL-12p40 in interstitial macrophages (MΦ; CD45+CD24CD11b+CD11c+), eosinophils (CD45+CD24+Siglec F+), DCs (CD45+CD24+Siglec FCD11c+), and neutrophils (CD45+CD24+Siglec FCD11cCD11b+). The IL-12p40+ DC population is shown in the bar graph (+/+ Veh: n = 5, +/+ Df: n = 12, and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ Df: n = 11). Values are mean ± SEM. ##P < 0.01 vs. NaCl-treated mice; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 vs. +/+ mice by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test.

To confirm that macrophage-intrinsic UDP/P2Y6 receptor signaling mediated the early Df-induced production of IL-12p40, we modified an AM transplantation protocol that does not involve myeloablation (35). BMMs were derived in vitro from the BMs of +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice in the presence of M-CSF and GM-CSF. Two million BMMs were delivered intratracheally to cohorts of recipient P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice. Fifteen days later, the engrafted mice were sensitized with Df, and quantities of IL-12p40 were measured on day 2 (Figure 6A). qPCR of BAL fluid cells confirmed the presence of the P2ry6 transcript in recipients of +/+ macrophages, albeit at lower levels than in +/+ mice (Figure 6B). Df-treated P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ recipient mice engrafted with +/+ BMMs showed markedly increased levels of IL-12p40 in the BAL fluid compared with P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ recipient mice engrafted with P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ BMMs, approximating the levels observed in Df-treated +/+ controls (Figure 6C). In contrast, P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice receiving P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ BMMs showed much lower levels of BAL fluid IL-12p40. Additionally, recipients of +/+ BMMs, but not recipients of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ BMMs, showed increased percentages of neutrophils (Figure 6, D and E), increased levels of MPO in BAL fluid (Figure 6F), and increased levels of Mpo mRNA in BAL fluid cells (Figure 6G) after 2 sensitizing doses of Df.

Figure 6. Pulmonary +/+ macrophage transplantation restores Df-induced IL-12p40 production and neutrophil infiltration during sensitization of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice.

Figure 6

(A) BM macrophages from +/+ or P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice were administered (i.t.) into +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice: +/+ macrophages into +/+ mice (+/+→+/+, n = 11); P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+→+/+ (n = 4); P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ (n = 7); and +/+→P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ (n = 7). (B) P2ry6 transcript in BAL fluid cells of pulmonary macrophage transplantation–treated (PMT-treated) +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 2 (17 days after transplantation). ##P < 0.01 by parametric t test. (C) BAL fluid IL-12p40 from PMT-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 2. (D) Diff-Quick–stained BAL fluid cells from the indicated mice. Red arrows indicate neutrophils. Scale bar: 50 µm. (E) Percentages of neutrophils in BAL fluid from PMT-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice. (F) MPO levels in BAL fluid of PMT-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 2. (G) BAL cell Mpo transcript levels of PMT-treated mice on day 2. Values are mean ± SEM. Data are from 2 experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. +/+→+/+ mice; #P < 0.05, ###P < 0.001 vs. P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (CG).

P2Y6 receptor signaling potentiates dectin-2–dependent IL-12p40 generation by macrophages in response to Df.

To determine whether UDP/P2Y6 receptor signaling directly altered IL-12p40 generation by macrophages, we treated BMMs from +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice with UDP and Df. UDP alone was unable to increase the secretion of IL-12p40 from BMMs (Supplemental Figure 10A). However, Df-induced secretion of IL-12p40 by +/+ BMMs was amplified after UDP priming for 6 hours. This UDP priming effect was abolished in BMMs from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice. Secretion of IL-12p40 by BMMs corresponded to their expression of Il12b transcript (Supplemental Figure 10A). In contrast, UDP failed to potentiate IL-12p40 production when the order of administration was reversed (Supplemental Figure 10A). We next conducted intrapulmonary challenges of +/+ mice with UDP on days 0 and 1, or before (day 0) or after (day 1) a single sensitizing dose of Df to determine whether it directly altered IL-12p40 generation in vivo. UDP alone on days 0 and 1 did not increase BAL fluid IL-12p40 levels, nor did it increase the quantities of Df-induced IL-12p40 when administered 24 hours after a single sensitizing dose (Supplemental Figure 10B). In contrast, administration of UDP on day 0 strongly potentiated the production of IL-12p40 induced by a single dose of Df administered on day 1, with quantities approaching those generated in response to 2 sensitizing doses of Df. UDP failed to potentiate Df-induced IL-12p40 production in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice. UDP also potentiated LPS-induced IL-12p40 generation by BMMs, although this effect was similar in +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ BMMs (Supplemental Figure 10C). To identify the receptor(s) for Df on macrophages required for IL-12p40 production, we administered sensitizing doses of Df to mice lacking Dectin-2 (Clec4n–/– mice), a C-type lectin receptor involved in innate immune recognition of carbohydrate structures associated with complex allergens (3). Compared with WT control mice, Clec4n–/– mice showed lower percentages of IL-12p40+CD68+ BAL fluid cells but similar increases in BAL fluid UDP levels (Supplemental Figure 11, A–C). From these experiments, we concluded that UDP/P2Y6 signaling synergizes with allergen-derived signals to induce IL-12 production by AMs.

Macrophage- and P2Y6-dependent IL-12 drives an early IFN-γ signature that depends on NK cells.

IFN-γ is a known effector downstream of IL-12 signaling that counteracts T2I and polarizes macrophages to an M1-type phenotype. To determine whether Df sensitization elicited an IFN-γ signature in the alveolar space, we examined BAL fluid cells from Df-sensitized +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice for markers of IFN-γ–induced transcription. Cells from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, compared with +/+ mice, expressed significantly lower levels of mRNA transcripts associated with M1 macrophage polarization and/or IFN-γ signatures, including Ccl5, Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Cxcl11, Ccl22, and Socs1 (Supplemental Table 1A). These were restored to near +/+ levels by transfer of macrophages from +/+ but not P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice and i.n. restoration of IL-12p70 (Supplemental Table 1, B and C), and were potentiated by a priming dose of UDP in WT mice (Supplemental Table 2) prior to Df sensitization. Ifng mRNA was strongly induced in BAL fluid cells from +/+ mice after 2 challenge doses of Df but was not induced in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Figure 7A). In contrast, whole-lung Ifng mRNA did not change with sensitization and did not differ between the strains. Transfer of +/+ but not P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ macrophages restored Df-induced Ifng expression to BAL fluid cells from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Figure 7B). In BAL fluid cells of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, administration of exogenous IL-12p70 also restored Ifng expression, which was limited to the CD11c cell fraction (Figure 7C). We administered exogenous recombinant IL-12p70, IL-12p80 (IL-12p40 homodimer), and IL-23 i.n. to WT mice on 2 successive days or after a single sensitizing dose of Df to determine whether they would induce IFN-γ production in vivo (Supplemental Figure 12A). IL-12p70, but not IL-12p80 or IL-23, significantly increased Ifng expression by BAL fluid cells in both treatments. Only administration of IL-23 after a single sensitizing dose of Df induced Il17a gene expression (Supplemental Figure 12B). In contrast, treatment with a neutralizing anti–IL-12Rβ2 mAb directed against a specific subunit of the IL-12p70 receptor significantly decreased recombinant IL-12p70–induced (ex vivo) and Df-induced (in vivo) Ifng transcript levels in BAL fluid cells (Supplemental Figure 12C). To determine whether IFN-γ production at sensitization was essential for P2Y6/IL-12–dependent suppression of T2I on day 16, we sensitized Ifng–/– mice and WT controls with Df and compared their responses with subsequent Df challenges. Compared with WT controls, Ifng–/– mice showed sharply increased numbers of BAL fluid total cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils on day 16 (Figure 7D). Histological examination confirmed that bronchovascular inflammation in Df-sensitized and -challenged Ifng–/– mice was more extensive than in WT controls (Figure 7E). Serum IgG2c was nearly undetectable in Ifng–/– mice (Figure 7F). Levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in BAL fluid and BAL fluid cell expression of Il4 and Il13 were significantly higher in Ifng–/– mice than in WT controls (Figure 7G and Supplemental Figure 13).

Figure 7. P2Y6-dependent IL-12 from AMs induces a protective IFN-γ signature.

Figure 7

(A) Ifng transcripts in BAL fluid cells and lungs from NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 2. **P < 0.01 vs. +/+ mice. (B) Ifng transcripts in BAL fluid cells from mice engrafted with +/+ or P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ macrophages on day 2. *P < 0.05 vs. +/+ recipient mice with +/+ macrophages (i.t.); ###P < 0.001 vs. P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ recipient with P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ macrophages (i.t.). (C) Ifng transcripts in CD11c+ and CD11c BAL fluid cells of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice that received vehicle or recombinant IL-12p70. ####P < 0.0001 vs. vehicle treatment. (D) BAL fluid cell counts of Df-treated WT and Ifng–/– mice on day 16. (E) Representative lung sections from Df-treated WT and Ifng–/– mice were stained with H&E on day 16. Scale bar: 300 µm. (F) Total serum IgG2c of Df-treated WT and Ifng–/– mice quantified on day 16. (G) Levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and of Epx transcript in BAL fluid cells of NaCl- or Df-treated WT and Ifng–/– mice. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. WT mice by 1-way (BG) or 2-way (A) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test.

To identify the major cell source(s) of protective IFN-γ present at sensitization, we focused on the Ly6G lymphocyte population (CD11c population) that was recruited to the alveolar spaces of sensitized +/+ mice and that was largely absent in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Figure 5A, bottom panels). We identified 4 populations within these lymphocytes based on staining for CD3 and NK1.1, with the 2 most abundant groups being CD3NK1.1+ and CD3+NK1.1, respectively (Figure 8A). Both the CD3NK1.1+ and CD3+NK1.1+ subsets strongly expressed Ifng (relative to Gapdh), but the CD3NK1.1+ subset was the dominant source of the transcript based on the differences in cell numbers (Figure 8A). The CD3NK1.1+ subset also showed greater mRNA expression of IL-12Rβ2 (Supplemental Figure 14A). Intranasal administration of an anti-NK1.1 mAb, which recognizes NK and NKT cells, substantially decreased the quantity of Ifng mRNA transcripts detected in BAL fluid cells (Figure 8B). BAL fluid cells from Cd1d–/– mice lacking NKT cells showed no decrement in Df-induced Ifng expression compared with WT controls (Figure 8C). Anti-NK1.1 treatment selectively depleted CD3CD49b+ and CD3NKp46+ lymphocyte populations from the BAL fluid, and sharply decreased expression of Nkg2d, without altering the numbers of CD3+ cells or expression of Il2 (Supplemental Figure 14, B and C). Compared with Df-sensitized +/+ mice, BAL fluid from P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice contained markedly decreased numbers of CD3NK1.1+ and CD3Nkp46+ cells, as well as fewer CD3+ cells (Figure 8D). Treatment of WT mice with i.n. anti-NK1.1 during sensitization sharply increased BAL fluid total cell and eosinophil counts, bronchovascular inflammation, and type 2 cytokine expression after Df challenge compared with WT mice receiving the isotype control (Figure 8E and Supplemental Figure 14D). In contrast, anti-NK1.1 at sensitization did not alter the expression of Ifng or Nkg2d in BAL fluid cells after Df challenge on day 16. Df-challenged NKT cell–deficient Cd1d–/– and WT mice showed similar numbers of BAL fluid eosinophils on day 16 (Supplemental Figure 14E). We concluded from these experiments that IFN-γ–producing NK cells, and not NKT cells, were the major downstream targets of the P2Y6-dependent, AM-derived IL-12 involved in the suppression of inappropriate type 2 responses.

Figure 8. P2Y6 regulates the influx of protective IFN-γ–producing NK cells.

Figure 8

(A) Characterization of BAL fluid lymphocytes from Df-treated WT mice on day 2 (4 mice per pool). Top row: Percentages of the indicated subgroups. Bottom row: Ifng transcripts relative to Gapdh in each population after the cell sorting. Data are expressed as arbitrary units (Ifng/Gapdh × numbers of cells) (n = 4; bottom row). Data are from 2 experiments. (B) Effect of i.n. anti-NK1.1 Ab (days 0 and 1) on expression of Ifng transcripts by BAL fluid cells of Df-treated WT mice. (C) Ifng expression by the BAL fluid cells from WT and Cd1d–/– mice on day 2. (D) Lymphocyte subsets in BAL fluid obtained from Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice after the second dose of Df. Representative plots are shown and quantitated in the bar graphs (+/+: n = 4; +/+ Df: n = 7; and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ Df: n = 6). (E) Effect of anti-NK1.1 Ab treatment at sensitization (days 0 and 1) on BAL fluid cell counts on day 16. Data are from 3 experiments. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test.

CysLT1R antagonists suppress early P2Y6 receptor–dependent signaling and IL-12p40 generation that counterbalances CysLT1R-induced T2I priming function.

P2Y6 receptors are structural homologs of the cysLT-specific GPCRs CysLT1R, CysLT2R, and CysLT3R (18, 20). CysLT1R is central to Dectin-2–mediated DC priming for T2I (33), and clinically active antagonists of this receptor can block P2Y6 receptor signaling in transfected cells (21). We sought to determine whether CysLT1R antagonists block natively expressed P2Y6 receptors, and if so whether this blockade modifies protective P2Y6 receptor signaling at the initiation of T2I in vivo. The CysLT1R antagonists montelukast, zafirlukast, pranlukast, and MK-571 all inhibited UDP-elicited calcium flux in 1321N1 cells stably expressing mouse P2ry6 (montelukast, zafirlukast, and pranlukast) or the macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 (MK-571) (Figure 9A). All 4 antagonists also blocked the UDP-elicited potentiation of Df-induced IL-12p40 generation by BMMs (Figure 9B). Montelukast also reduced IL-12p40 generation in response to Df alone at the highest dose tested. Exogenous LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 did not potentiate IL-12p40 production by BMMs, and UDP did not induce cysLT generation by BMMs (data not shown). Administration of either zafirlukast (i.p.) or MK-571 (i.n.) to WT mice during Df sensitization significantly reduced the concentration of IL-12p40 in BAL fluid and decreased expression of Ifng by BAL fluid cells (Figure 9C). IL-12p40 levels and Ifng transcripts were tightly correlated (Figure 9C). Administration of zafirlukast at sensitization markedly decreased the numbers of BAL fluid total cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils, bronchovascular inflammation, and type 2 cytokine and Epx expression induced by Df on day 16 in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, but did not affect the modest levels seen in +/+ controls (Figure 9D and Supplemental Figure 15, A and B).

Figure 9. CysLT1R antagonists inhibit early P2Y6 receptor–dependent signaling that counterbalances CysLT1R-induced T2I priming function.

Figure 9

(A) CysLT1R antagonists blocked UDP-elicited calcium flux induced in 1321N1 cells stably expressing mouse P2ry6 (montelukast, zafirlukast, and pranlukast) and the macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 (MK-571). Values are mean (n = 4). (B) The CysLT1R antagonists all inhibited the UDP-elicited (10 μM) potentiation of Df-induced IL-12p40 generation in BM-derived macrophages (n = 8). (C) Effect of zafirlukast (i.p.) or MK-571 (i.n.) at sensitization on the BAL concentration of IL-12p40 and expression of Ifng transcripts by BAL fluid cells. The correlation between BAL concentration of IL-12p40 and Ifng transcripts is shown. (D) BAL fluid cell counts of NaCl- or Df-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice administered zafirlukast (i.p.) at sensitization (+/+ Veh: n = 12; +/+ zafirlukast: n = 12; P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ Veh: n = 17; and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ zafirlukast: n = 16). ###P < 0.001, ####P < 0.0001, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. Values are mean ± SEM. Data are from 2 experiments, except for the calcium flux experiments.

Discussion

Innate responses of tissue-resident cells to allergens and pathogens instruct subsequent adaptive immune responses, and determine whether subsequent encounters with the same antigens and pathogens will elicit T2I. The broad distribution of P2 receptors (36) — and the availability of their ligands resulting from cellular damage, stress, or activation — suggests the potential for P2 receptor signaling in innate immunity. While the role of ATP in the initial sensitization stage of T2I is well recognized (4, 22), less is known about the role of UDP and its cognate receptor. Extracellular concentrations of uracil nucleotides are lower than those of ATP (37), but the high affinity of P2Y6 receptors and their expression by both structural and hematopoietic cells of the lung suggest that these cells are highly sensitive to extracellular UDP. While pharmacologic blockade of P2Y6 receptors blunts T2I in sensitized mice (26), genetic deletion of P2Y6 receptors sharply enhances T2I and associated eosinophilic inflammation in response to repetitive, low-dose inhalation challenges with Df, an allergen strongly linked to asthma in humans (31). Moreover, selective agonism of P2Y6 receptors suppresses inflammation and airway reactivity in mice (32). We therefore undertook this study to understand the mechanisms and cellular targets that account for the apparent protective effects of P2Y6 receptor signaling in the lung, and to explain the contradictory results. Moreover, we sought to determine the potential consequences of off-target P2Y6 blockade by clinically available CysLT1R antagonists in vivo, particularly in a context where endogenous cysLTs play a major role in sensitization for T2I.

We modified our protocol to incorporate temporally distinct sensitization and challenge phases to account for the possibility that P2Y6 receptors may serve very different functions during the initial and subsequent responses to antigen exposure (Figure 1A). Deletion of P2ry6 prior to the sensitization phase in this modified model mirrored the enhanced lung T2I in the P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice that we had observed in our prior studies using a protocol without distinct sensitization and challenge phases (ref. 31 and Figure 1). In contrast, deletion of P2ry6 after sensitization sharply reduced eosinophilia and type 2 cytokine production (Figure 1). Levels of mRNA encoding Il6 and the CXCR2 ligand Cxcl1 (both of which were previously identified as major P2Y6 receptor–driven products of lung epithelium [ref. 26]) were significantly reduced in the lungs of P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice subjected to gene deletion after, but not before, sensitization (Supplemental Figure 5). Combined with the observed increase in BAL fluid UDP occurring within 3 hours of the initial sensitizing dose of Df (Figure 3D), these observations support an early (and likely innate) cellular target of P2Y6 receptor activation as a prime modifier of the subsequent immune response. Our bioassay showed that P2Y6-induced calcium flux induced by BAL fluids completely disappeared after pretreatment with the nucleotide-hydrolyzing enzyme apyrase (Supplemental Figure 7B). Although we cannot exclude the possibility that nucleotides other than UDP activate the P2Y6 receptor in vivo, UTP (which is rapidly converted to UDP in vivo) and ADP showed more than 30 and 300 times lower affinity, respectively, than UDP for mouse P2Y6 (Supplemental Figure 7D). It is thus likely that UDP is the most relevant ligand driving the activation of P2Y6 receptors. While the effector function of P2Y6 receptors in the challenge phase may well reflect control of epithelial cell–derived proinflammatory factors, as suggested by previous studies (26), the basis of its protective functions during sensitization became the focus of our subsequent experiments.

We used a combination of conditionally gene-deleted mice and cell transfers to identify the target cells and mechanisms responsible for the protective effect of P2Y6 receptors in the sensitization phase. Scgb1a1-driven P2ry6 deletion failed to potentiate inflammation, indicating that the protective effect of P2Y6 receptor signaling was not due to Clara cell–intrinsic signaling (Figure 2A). Although we had previously demonstrated that P2Y6 receptors were inducibly expressed by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after challenge with Df (31), constitutive Cd4-driven P2ry6 deletion (which eliminates gene expression at the double-positive state of thymic T cell development) did not recapitulate the effect of global P2ry6 deletion proximal to sensitization (Figure 2B). Results of experiments involving adoptive transfer of BM into lethally irradiated mice not only supported the involvement of P2Y6 receptors expressed by hematopoietic cells in the protective response (Figure 2C), but also revealed that hematopoietic cells accounted for approximately 80% of the P2ry6 transcript expressed by the lung on day 16. We therefore focused our attention on the potential role of P2Y6 receptors on lung-resident hematopoietic cells and on whether P2Y6 receptor signaling was critical to their generation of products that regulate immune responses during the initial exposure to antigens.

Macrophages and CD8+ DCs, the innate hematopoietic cells most strongly expressing P2Y6 receptors (http://rstats.immgen.org/Skyline/skyline.html), generate cytokines on initial encounters with antigens that can inform adaptive responses.

IL-12 generated at sensitization has a known protective effect against inappropriate T2I (38), although the cell sources and regulatory mechanisms are not fully understood. Our study indicates that UDP/P2Y6 signaling facilitates IL-12 generation by AMs as a prominent component of P2Y6-dependent protection from T2I. BAL fluid levels of IL-12p40 (a subunit of both IL-12 and IL-23), but not levels of IL-23, IL-10, or IL-18, increased shortly after administration of sensitizing doses of Df in +/+ but not P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, without corresponding changes in serum IL-12p40 (Figure 3C). This increase occurred concomitantly with increases in UDP (Figure 3D). Restoring physiologic concentrations of IL-12 at sensitization (Figure 4A) decreased BAL fluid total cell and eosinophil counts (Figure 4B) and tissue Epx expression (Figure 4C) in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice to levels similar to those observed in +/+ controls, and also increased serum IgG2c in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice to +/+ levels (Figure 4D) (in retrospect, a likely reflection of IFN-γ). Df sensitization increased expression of IL-12p40 protein specifically in CD68+CD11c+ AMs in a P2Y6 receptor–dependent manner (Figure 5A and Supplemental Figure 9), with minimal contributions from interstitial macrophages, DCs, and granulocytes (Figure 5B). Finally, transfer of macrophages derived from the BM of +/+, but not P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+, mice restored early Df-induced IL-12p40 (Figure 6), along with Df-induced neutrophil recruitment. Although exogenous UDP was insufficient alone to induce IL-12p40 generation, it substantially primed macrophages ex vivo and in vivo (Supplemental Figure 10) for Df-induced IL-12p40 generation. The absence of Df-induced IL-12p40 in AMs of Clec4n–/– mice (Supplemental Figure 11) supports the argument that branched mannans associated with Df act as direct ligands for Dectin-2 on macrophages (3) as they do on DCs (3). Notably, other major “Th2-sensitizing” allergens, such as those associated with Dermatophagoides farinae and Aspergillus fumigatus, require Dectin-2 signaling on DCs to elicit sensitization of Th2 cells and subsequent T2I (33). Our studies suggest that P2Y6 signaling facilitates Dectin-2–dependent AM activation, counteracting Th2 sensitization and its consequences through early generation of IL-12p40. Moreover, macrophage- and P2Y6-driven IL-12 is necessary to activate a population of NK cells that provide IFN-γ to counteract subsequent T2I at the challenge phase (Figures 7 and 8).

IL-12p40 can homodimerize to form IL-12p80, or can pair with IL-12p35 or IL-23p19 to form IL-12p70 or IL-23, respectively. Although we did not detect IL-12p70 (a known inducer of IFN-γ responses) in BAL fluid, we found a marked correlation between BAL IL-12p40 and IFN-γ production (Supplemental Figure 12A and Figure 9C). Our data suggest that IL-12p80 and IL-23 do not contribute to the innate Th1-like immune response during the sensitization phase (Supplemental Figure 12A). Exogenous IL-23, but not IL-12p70 or IL-12p80, induced IL-17a expression by BAL fluid cells (Supplemental Figure 12B). IL-17a expression was not induced by Df or P2Y6 during the sensitization phase (data not shown). Moreover, neutralizing anti-IL-12Rβ2 (a subunit of the IL-12p70 receptor) mAb inhibits the recombinant IL-12p70–induced (ex vivo) and Df-induced (in vivo) Ifng expression detected in BAL fluid cells (Supplemental Figure 12C). Although these data support the functional contribution of IL-12p70 to Ifng expression, we cannot exclude contributions from other P2Y6-regulated pathways. Indeed, levels of Th1/M1 cytokines/chemokines from AMs (including several that act on NK cells) were also decreased in P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (Supplemental Table 1). Further investigations are needed to determine the potential contributions from these cytokines and chemokines to the integrated P2Y6-regulated IFN-γ response.

Clinically active CysLT1R antagonists achieve plasma concentrations of 0.5–1.5 μM when administered orally to human subjects, which are within the range reported to block human P2Y6 (and other P2Y receptors) in vitro (21). We confirmed that 4 different CysLT1R antagonists block calcium flux and potentiation of IL-12p40 elicited by mouse P2Y6 receptor signaling ex vivo, albeit at higher concentrations than those reported for the human counterpart (Figure 9, A–C). More importantly, administration of 2 different CysLT1R antagonists significantly impaired the production of IL-12p40 by AMs that leads to IFN-γ production by NK cells to Df sensitization, confirming that these drugs also block P2Y6 receptor signaling in vivo. Several clinically important allergens (Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Aspergillus fumigatus) associated with asthma prime DCs for T2I by a Dectin-2/CysLT1R pathway (3, 33). Our results suggest that the effects of this pathway are counteracted by Dectin-2/P2Y6 receptor signaling, and that absence or impairment of the latter pathway magnifies the effects of the former (and hence the ability of CysLT1R antagonists to block T2I). CysLT1R antagonists are FDA approved to treat asthma and rhinitis in children as young as 6 months (39). The incidence of de novo sensitization to inhalant antigens is high in children. Our findings could help to explain the widely variable individual responses to CysLT1R antagonists (15), and suggest that the development of drugs with greater selectivity for CysLT1R (or CysLT1R antagonists with P2Y6 receptor agonism) would confer a more robust and consistent therapeutic effect by protecting susceptible populations from T2I sensitization.

Methods

Further information can be found in Supplemental Methods, available online with this article.

Animals.

P2ry6fl/fl/+/+ mice and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice were derived as previously reported and backcrossed for 10 generations with C57BL/6 mice (31). To delete the P2Y6 receptor ubiquitously, we induced Rosa26 Cre recombinase in 10- to 19-week-old P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice (as shown in Figure 1C, Figures 3–8, and the supplemental figures) by administration of tamoxifen (1 mg; MilliporeSigma) dissolved in a mixture of ethanol/sunflower seed oil (1:4.5, v/v) by i.p. injections on 5 consecutive days (Figure 1A). C57BL/6-P2ry6tm2450Arte mice were intercrossed with Cd4-Cre mice to generate P2ry6fl/fl Cd4-Cre/+ mice and with Scgb1a1-Cre mice to generate P2ry6fl/fl Scgb1a1-Cre/+ mice (Figure 2, A and B) at the University Medical Center Freiburg. Ifng–/– (B6.129S7-Ifngtm1Ts/J) and Cd1d–/– [B6.129S6-Del(3Cd1d2-Cd1d1)1Sbp/J] mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. Clec4n–/– mice were provided by Yoichiro Iwakura (Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan). C57BL/6 controls were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and Charles River.

Induction of allergic pulmonary inflammation and in vivo injection.

Ten days after the last administration of tamoxifen, allergic pulmonary inflammation was induced in +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice by separate sensitization (20 μg i.n. on days 0 and 1) and challenge (3 μg i.n. on days 14 and 15) with Df (Greer Laboratories). Control groups of +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice received 0.9% NaCl alone. After the Df treatment, mice were euthanized, and blood was collected by cardiac puncture and centrifuged to obtain serum. Lungs were lavaged 2 times with 1.0 mL PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA. BAL fluid cells were cytocentrifuged onto slides, stained with Diff-Quick (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.), and differentially counted. Left lungs were collected at the time of euthanasia, fixed with 4% PFA overnight, and embedded in glycol methacrylate. Sections were stained with H&E as previously reported (40). Light microscopic images were captured using a Leica DM LB2 light microscope with HC PL FLUOTSR 10×/0.30 (H&E stain) and 40×/0.75 (Diff-Quick stain) objective lens (Leica) and Nikon ACT-1 software at 22°C. Pictures were not further adjusted for brightness and contrast.

For restoration of IL-12 protein in the alveolar space, mice received i.n. administered recombinant murine IL-12p70 (500 ng, Thermo Fisher Scientific) on 4 consecutive days during the sensitization phase. For depletion of NK cells in the alveolar space, mice received i.n. administered 10 μg anti-NK1.1 (PK136, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or control mouse IgG2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on days 0 and 1. Intranasal injection of UDP (MilliporeSigma; 80 nmol in NaCl) was performed on days 0 and 1, or before (day 0) or after (day 1) a single sensitizing dose of Df (20 μg). To study the role of IL-12p40, we i.n. injected IL-12p70, IL-12p80 (p40 homodimer, 500 ng, BioLegend), and IL-23 (500 ng, BioLegend) on days 0 and 1 or after (day 1) a single sensitizing dose of Df (20 μg). Intranasal injection of neutralizing mouse IL-12Rβ2 antibody (10 μg in PBS, R&D Systems) and control IgG (R&D Systems) was performed on days 0 and 1. Zafirlukast (Cayman Chemical) for i.p. injection (30 mg/kg) was suspended in a 30% propylene glycol (PG) solution (70% NaCl/30% PG [PG/PEG40/Tween-80, 4:2:1]) before use. Control mice received the same volume of 30% PG alone. MK-571 (Cayman Chemical) was dissolved in NaCl (100 nmol/20 μL) and administered i.n.

BMM and BM-derived DC generation.

For bone BMM generation, BM cells obtained from tamoxifen-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 10 were harvested, and this suspension (4 × 106 cells/10 mL) was cultured in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 100 ng/mL recombinant mouse M-CSF (R&D Systems). On day 3, 5 mL complete medium with M-CSF was added, and the adherent cells were harvested on day 6 or 7. For IL-12p40 measurement ex vivo, BMMs were plated in 96-well plates in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin and cultured overnight. BMDCs were generated with GM-CSF, as previously described (3). In brief, BM cells were cultured in RPMI medium with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine, 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 20 ng/mL recombinant mouse GM-CSF (Peprotech). On day 3, 10 mL complete medium with GM-CSF was added, and on day 6, 10 mL medium with GM-CSF was exchanged from each plate. The floating cells were harvested on day 7.

Flow cytometry.

Mouse lungs were transferred into a 6-well dish, and tissue was teased apart with forceps. Then the tissues were digested at 37°C for 30 minutes in RPMI containing 428 U/mL Collagenase IV (Worthington) and 20 μg/mL DNAse I (Roche). Cells were filtered through 70-μm nylon meshes and pelleted by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 350 g at 4°C. RBC lysis was performed by resuspending the pellet in 5 mL RBC lysis buffer (BioLegend) and incubating on ice for 4 minutes; this was terminated by addition of 10 mL PBS. Cells were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 350 g at 4°C and washed with FACS buffer (0.5% BSA in HBSS). A total of 1 × 106 cells were blocked (15 minutes, 4°C) with 1% anti–mouse CD16/CD32 (BioLegend) and stained with cell surface markers: CD45-PerCP/Cy5.5, CD24-BV421, CD11c–PE-Cy7, CD11b–APC-Cy7, and Siglec F–PE. Cells were washed and fixed/permeabilized with a BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) and then stained with IL-12(p40/p70)–APC (overnight, 4°C). For IL-12p40 staining in BAL fluid cells, collected BAL cells were washed and immediately fixed/permeabilized with a BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit. Cells were blocked (15 minutes, 4°C) with 1% anti–mouse CD16/CD32 and stained with appropriate antibodies: IL-12(p40/p70)–PE, CD45-BV421, CD68-APC, Ly-6G–BV510, and CD11c–PE-Cy7 (overnight, 4°C). Lymphocytes in BAL fluid were stained with Zombie Aqua Fixable Viability Kit (BioLegend) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, blocked (15 minutes, 4°C) with 1% anti–mouse CD16/CD32, and stained (30 minutes, 4°C) with a cell surface marker: CD45-BV421, CD335(Nkp46)-APC, NK1.1–APC-vio770, CD3–PE-Cy7 or CD3–APC-Cy7, and CD49b–PE-Cy7. Analyses were performed on a FACSCanto flow cytometer or FACS Fortessa analyser (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with FlowJo (TreeStar). Antibodies used are listed in Supplemental Table 3.

Real-time qPCR of mRNA transcripts.

Right lung, spleen, lymph node, BM, and BAL cells were collected at time of euthanasia and snap-frozen. AMs were purified from BAL of Df- and IL-12–treated mice by positive CD11c MACS selection (Miltenyi Biotec), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. AM purity was checked by staining with Diff-Quick and was confirmed to be greater than 95%. Sorting of CD3NK1.1+, CD3+NK1.1, CD3+NK1.1+, and CD3NK1.1 (NK1.1-APC, CD3-PE) cells in BAL fluid cells, CCR2 inflammatory monocytes (CCR2-PE+, Ly6C-APC+, CD45-BV421+), T cells (CD45-BV421+, CD3-PE+, CD90-APC+), and ILCs (CD45-BV421+, Lin-FITC, CD90-APC+) in dispersed lungs was performed using a FACSDiva 8.0.1 cell sorter (BD Biosciences). Total RNA was isolated from tissue homogenate, BAL cells, BMDCs, BMMs, and sorted cells with QIAzol reagent (QIAGEN). For a few cells, glycogen (RNA grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used as an inert carrier to increase nucleic acid recovery from alcohol precipitation. Total RNA was converted to cDNA using an RT2 First Strand Kit (QIAGEN). The expression of each gene was examined using an RT2 SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (QIAGEN). Expression levels of transcripts were normalized to the expression of Gapdh. All primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 4.

UDP bioassay and calcium flux.

We transfected 1321N1 cells (gift from Y. Kanaoka, Brigham and Women’s Hospital) with the mouse P2ry6 expression plasmid (pEF1-mouse P2ry6) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Stably transfected cells were selected with G418 for more than 21 days. Mouse 1321N1 cells stably expressing P2Y6, parental cells, BMMs, and the macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 (ATCC) were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The cell suspension was plated in a 384-well plate (Greiner Bio-One) at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well. Following incubation for 18–24 hours, cells were changed to fresh HBSS medium and loaded with Fluo-8 (final, 2 μM; AAT Bioquest), probenecid (final, 2.5 mM; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and PowerLoad (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in HBSS. After 30 minutes, CysLT1 antagonists (montelukast, zafirlukast, pranlukast, and MK-571; Cayman Chemical), UDP (MilliporeSigma), and BAL fluid in compound plate (Nunc) were added at defined concentrations, followed by an immediate recording of the fluorescence using the Functional Drug Screening System/FDSS7000EX (Hamamatsu). Fluorescence intensity was expressed as a Fluo-8 ratio (tested value/basal value). Apyrase (2 U/mL; MilliporeSigma) was preincubated at 37°C for 60 minutes.

ELISA and measurement of EPO.

Concentrations of IL-12p40, IL-12p70, IL-23, IL-10, IL-18, MPO, IFN-γ, cysteinyl leukotrienes, and Igs (total IgE, IgG2c, and IgM) in BAL, serum, and supernatants from the ex vivo BMMs were assayed by using commercially available ELISA kits according to the instructions of manufacturers BD Biosciences (IL-12p40 and IFN-γ), BioLegend (IL-12p70), R&D Systems (MPO), Peprotech (IL-10), Cayman Chemical (cysteinyl leukotrienes), and Thermo Fisher Scientific (IL-18, IL-23, and Igs). EPO in BAL supernatants was analyzed as previously reported (41). In brief, 50 μL BAL was mixed with 100 μL substrate (0.2 mg/mL o-phenylenediamine in Tris, pH 8.0, including 0.1% Triton and 0.02% H2O2) in 96-well plates. The reaction was allowed to progress for 30 minutes before being quenched with 50 μL of 4 M sulfuric acid. Plates were read at 490 nm with a plate reader.

Adoptive transplantation of BM.

Adoptive transplantation of BM was performed as described previously (42). +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice were lethally irradiated (12 Gy) in 2 split doses on the same day 10 days after the last administration of tamoxifen. Immediately after the second dose of irradiation, recipient mice were injected into the lateral tail vein with 1 × 107 BM cells in a total volume of 200 μL PBS obtained from sex-matched tamoxifen-treated +/+ mice and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice. As a result of the BM transfer, 4 groups of chimeric mice were generated: +/+ BM into +/+ mice (+/+→+/+), +/+→P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice, P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+→+/+ mice, and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice. Ten weeks after the adoptive transplantation of BM, allergic pulmonary inflammation was induced by i.n. instillation of Df, as described above.

Pulmonary macrophage transplantation.

AM transplantation was performed as described previously (35). BM cells obtained from tamoxifen-treated +/+ and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice on day 10 were harvested, and this suspension (~27 × 106 cells/10 mL) was cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 10 ng/mL recombinant mouse GM-CSF and 5 ng/mL recombinant mouse M-CSF (both from R&D System). The next day, non- or weakly adherent cells were transferred to a new petri dish and cultured. After 2 days, 10 mL medium with GM-CSF and M-CSF was exchanged from each plate; and 5 days after seeding, adherent BM-derived macrophages were used for AM transplantation. Two million BM-derived macrophages in a total volume of 50 μL PBS were administered into the lungs of +/+ mice and P2ry6fl/fl/Cre/+ mice using a relatively noninvasive endotracheal instillation method described previously (35). The next day, mice were administered with tamoxifen for 5 consecutive days and 10 days after the last tamoxifen treatment, allergic pulmonary inflammation was induced by i.n. instillation of Df, as described above.

Statistics.

All values are presented as mean ± SEM. Figures were produced and statistics analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software). When data were not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons of 2 groups. A 2-tailed unpaired t test for equal variance and Welch’s correction for unequal variance were used when comparing 2 groups. Differences among multiple groups were assessed using 1-way or 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Study approval.

All experiments described herein were approved by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital IACUC and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Animal Care and Utilization Committee.

Author contributions

JN designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the data. LBF and TK performed experiments. JN developed the UDP assay. BB provided advice on the macrophage-related experiments. HC and JL provided technical assistance. MI, AZ, EYK, and PJB provided intellectual and strategic input. JAB oversaw the project and experiments, and composed the manuscript with JN.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Howard Katz and Juying Lai for histopathologic analysis. This work was supported by contributions from the Vinik Family; the Kaye Family; NIH grants AI078908, HL111113, HL117945, R37AI052353, R01AI136041, R01HL136209, R01AI130109, and U19AI095219; and an American Heart Association grant (15FTF25080205) awarded to EYK.

Version 1. 10/22/2019

Electronic publication

Version 2. 12/02/2019

Print issue publication

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(12):5169–5186.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129761.

Contributor Information

Jun Nagai, Email: jnagai@partners.org.

Barbara Balestrieri, Email: bbalestrieri@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.

Timothy Kyin, Email: ttk8c@virginia.edu.

Haley Cirka, Email: hcirka27@gmail.com.

Junrui Lin, Email: jlin36@bwh.harvard.edu.

Marco Idzko, Email: marco.idzko@meduniwien.ac.at.

Andreas Zech, Email: andreas.zech@meduniwien.ac.at.

Edy Y. Kim, Email: ekim11@bwh.harvard.edu.

References

  • 1.Howitt MR, et al. Tuft cells, taste-chemosensory cells, orchestrate parasite type 2 immunity in the gut. Science. 2016;351(6279):1329–1333. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Monticelli LA, et al. Innate lymphoid cells promote lung-tissue homeostasis after infection with influenza virus. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(11):1045–1054. doi: 10.1038/ni.2131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barrett NA, Maekawa A, Rahman OM, Austen KF, Kanaoka Y. Dectin-2 recognition of house dust mite triggers cysteinyl leukotriene generation by dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2009;182(2):1119–1128. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.2.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kouzaki H, Iijima K, Kobayashi T, O’Grady SM, Kita H. The danger signal, extracellular ATP, is a sensor for an airborne allergen and triggers IL-33 release and innate Th2-type responses. J Immunol. 2011;186(7):4375–4387. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang YH, et al. Maintenance and polarization of human TH2 central memory T cells by thymic stromal lymphopoietin-activated dendritic cells. Immunity. 2006;24(6):827–838. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Saglani S, et al. IL-33 promotes airway remodeling in pediatric patients with severe steroid-resistant asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(3):676–685.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hsu Blatman KS, Gonsalves N, Hirano I, Bryce PJ. Expression of mast cell-associated genes is upregulated in adult eosinophilic esophagitis and responds to steroid or dietary therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(5):1307–8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gevaert P, et al. Nasal IL-5 levels determine the response to anti-IL-5 treatment in patients with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(5):1133–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beck LA, et al. Dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):130–139. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bel EH, et al. Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of mepolizumab in eosinophilic asthma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1189–1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ullah MA, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products and its ligand high-mobility group box-1 mediate allergic airway sensitization and airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(2):440–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.12.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weiss JW, et al. Bronchoconstrictor effects of leukotriene C in humans. Science. 1982;216(4542):196–198. doi: 10.1126/science.7063880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Drazen JM, Lilly CM, Sperling R, Rubin P, Israel E. Role of cysteinyl leukotrienes in spontaneous asthmatic responses. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukot Res. 1994;22:251–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doherty TA, Khorram N, Lund S, Mehta AK, Croft M, Broide DH. Lung type 2 innate lymphoid cells express cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1, which regulates TH2 cytokine production. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(1):205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Szefler SJ, et al. Characterization of within-subject responses to fluticasone and montelukast in childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(2):233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wada M, Nagata S, Kudo T, Shimizu T, Yamashiro Y. Effect of suplatast tosilate on antileukotriene non-responders with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Allergol Int. 2009;58(3):389–393. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.08-OA-0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rabinovitch N, et al. Urinary leukotriene E4/exhaled nitric oxide ratio and montelukast response in childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(3):545–51.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kanaoka Y, Maekawa A, Austen KF. Identification of GPR99 protein as a potential third cysteinyl leukotriene receptor with a preference for leukotriene E4 ligand. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(16):10967–10972. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C113.453704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Communi D, Boeynaems JM. Receptors responsive to extracellular pyrimidine nucleotides. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997;18(3):83–86. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(96)01035-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mellor EA, Maekawa A, Austen KF, Boyce JA. Cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 is also a pyrimidinergic receptor and is expressed by human mast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(14):7964–7969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141221498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mamedova L, et al. CysLT1 leukotriene receptor antagonists inhibit the effects of nucleotides acting at P2Y receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;71(1-2):115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Idzko M, et al. Extracellular ATP triggers and maintains asthmatic airway inflammation by activating dendritic cells. Nat Med. 2007;13(8):913–919. doi: 10.1038/nm1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lazarowski ER, Boucher RC. UTP as an extracellular signaling molecule. News Physiol Sci. 2001;16:1–5. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.2001.16.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Communi D, Parmentier M, Boeynaems JM. Cloning, functional expression and tissue distribution of the human P2Y6 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;222(2):303–308. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grbic DM, Degagné E, Langlois C, Dupuis AA, Gendron FP. Intestinal inflammation increases the expression of the P2Y6 receptor on epithelial cells and the release of CXC chemokine ligand 8 by UDP. J Immunol. 2008;180(4):2659–2668. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vieira RP, et al. Purinergic receptor type 6 contributes to airway inflammation and remodeling in experimental allergic airway inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(2):215–223. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201011-1762OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jin J, Dasari VR, Sistare FD, Kunapuli SP. Distribution of P2Y receptor subtypes on haematopoietic cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;123(5):789–794. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maier R, Glatz A, Mosbacher J, Bilbe G. Cloning of P2Y6 cDNAs and identification of a pseudogene: comparison of P2Y receptor subtype expression in bone and brain tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;240(2):298–302. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Warny M, et al. P2Y(6) nucleotide receptor mediates monocyte interleukin-8 production in response to UDP or lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(28):26051–26056. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102568200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bar I, et al. Knockout mice reveal a role for P2Y6 receptor in macrophages, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74(3):777–784. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.046904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Giannattasio G, Ohta S, Boyce JR, Xing W, Balestrieri B, Boyce JA. The purinergic G protein-coupled receptor 6 inhibits effector T cell activation in allergic pulmonary inflammation. J Immunol. 2011;187(3):1486–1495. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chetty A, et al. A purinergic P2Y6 receptor agonist prodrug modulates airway inflammation, remodeling, and hyperreactivity in a mouse model of asthma. J Asthma Allergy. 2018;11:159–171. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S151849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barrett NA, et al. Dectin-2 mediates Th2 immunity through the generation of cysteinyl leukotrienes. J Exp Med. 2011;208(3):593–604. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tyznik AJ, Verma S, Wang Q, Kronenberg M, Benedict CA. Distinct requirements for activation of NKT and NK cells during viral infection. J Immunol. 2014;192(8):3676–3685. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Suzuki T, et al. Pulmonary macrophage transplantation therapy. Nature. 2014;514(7523):450–454. doi: 10.1038/nature13807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Burnstock G, Knight GE. Cellular distribution and functions of P2 receptor subtypes in different systems. Int Rev Cytol. 2004;240:31–304. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(04)40002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Boeynaems JM, Communi D, Gonzalez NS, Robaye B. Overview of the P2 receptors. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005;31(2):139–149. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-869519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meyts I, et al. IL-12 contributes to allergen-induced airway inflammation in experimental asthma. J Immunol. 2006;177(9):6460–6470. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Knorr B, et al. Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, for the treatment of persistent asthma in children aged 2 to 5 years. Pediatrics. 2001;108(3):E48. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Howell WH, Donahue DD. The production of blood platelets in the lungs. J Exp Med. 1937;65(2):177–203. doi: 10.1084/jem.65.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Campbell EM, Kunkel SL, Strieter RM, Lukacs NW. Temporal role of chemokines in a murine model of cockroach allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity and eosinophilia. J Immunol. 1998;161(12):7047–7053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu T, et al. Prostaglandin E2 deficiency uncovers a dominant role for thromboxane A2 in house dust mite-induced allergic pulmonary inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(31):12692–12697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207816109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES