Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Jan 6;14(1):56–64. doi: 10.1002/mpr.17

Generalizability of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale prototypical profiles and their use in evaluating treatment outcomes

Gary K Burger 1,✉, Robert D Yonker 2, Robert J Calsyn 1, Gary A Morse 3, W D Klinkenberg 4
PMCID: PMC6878227  PMID: 16097400

Abstract

The generalizability of previously isolated prototypical profiles of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was examined in a sample of homeless individuals with both severe mental illness and substance‐use problems who were part of a 24‐month study that evaluated the effectiveness of various treatment interventions. These prototypical profiles (depressed, actively psychotic, and withdrawn) did generalize to the new sample, with a 59.4% coverage rate. In addition, some of the participants' BPRS profiles (10%) were characterized by negative correlations with the withdrawn profile (termed agitated) and others (17%) by minimal within‐profile variability (labelled flat). Overall, with these additions, the coverage of the prototypical profiles was 86.4%. These prototypical profiles were then used to evaluate changes in profile elevation and shape over the course of the study. Generally, changes in both profile elevation and shape were moderated by the particular prototypical profile that the participants resembled. The use of these prototypical profiles in evaluating change permits a more precise analysis of what kind of individuals manifest particular effects. The clinical meaning of the BPRS profile changes observed was also discussed. Copyright © 2005 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Keywords: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, profiles, Q‐type factor analysis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (177.1 KB).

References

  1. Benazzi F, Helmi S, Bland L. Agitated depression: Unipolar? Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 2002; 14(2): 97–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burger GK, Calsyn RJ, Morse GA, Klinkenberg WD, Trusty M. Factor structure of the expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1997; 53(5): 451–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burger GK, Calsyn RJ, Morse GA, Klinkenberg WD. Prototypical profiles of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 2000; 75(3): 373–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burger GK, Yonker RD, Calsyn RJ, Morse GA, Klinkenberg WD. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in a homeless sample. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2003; 12(4): 192–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calsyn RJ, Morse GA, Klinkenberg WD, Yonker RD, Calsyn M. Evaluating the effectiveness of treatment programs for dual diagnosed clients. Paper presented at the twenty‐first Latin American Congress of Psychiatry, Lima, Peru, 2000.
  6. Coryell W, Winokur G, Shea, T , Maser JD, Endicott J, Akiskal HS. The long‐term stability of depressive subtypes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1994; 151(2): 199–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin 1953; 50: 465–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drake RE, Mercer‐McFadden C, Mueser K, McHugo GJ, Bond GR. A review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1998; 24: 569–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Faustman WO, Overall JE. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale In Maruish M. (ed.) The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment. 2 edn Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, 1999, pp. 791–830. [Google Scholar]
  10. Filteau MJ, Baruch P, Lapierre YD, Bakish D, Blanchard A. SSRIs in anxious‐agitated depression: A post‐hoc analysis of 279 patients. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1995; 10(1): 51–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams J. Users Guide for Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Disorders‐Research Version. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, Revised. Rockville MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hedlund JL, Viewig BW. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): a comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry 1980; 11: 48–65. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lachar D, Bailey SE, Rhoades HM, Espsdas A, Aponte M, Cowan KA, Gummattira P, Kopecky C, Wassef A. New subscales for an anchored version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: Construction, reliability, and validity in acute psychiatric admissions. Psychological Assessment 2001; 3(3): 384–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lindenmayer JP. The Pathophysiology of Agitation. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2000; 61(14): 5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mueser KT, Curran PJ, McHugo GJ. Factor structure of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in schizophrenia. Psychological Assessment 1997; 9: 196–204. [Google Scholar]
  17. Morse GA, Calsyn RJ, Allen G, Tempelhoff B, Smith R. Experimental comparison of the effects of three treatment programs for homeless mentally ill people. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1992; 43: 1005–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morse GA, Calsyn RJ, Klinkenberg WD, Trusty ML, Gerber F, Smith R, Tempelhoff B, Ahmad L. An experimental comparison of three types of case management for homeless mentally ill persons. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48: 497–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports 1962; 10: 799–812. [Google Scholar]
  20. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1988; 24: 97–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Overall JE, Klett CJ. Applied Multivariate Analysis. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  22. Payne FD, Wiggins JS. The effects of rule relaxation and system combination on classification rates in two MMPI ‘cookbook’ systems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1968; 32: 734–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perugi G, Akiskal HS, Micheli C, Musetti L, Paiano A, Quilici C, Rossi L, Cassano GB. Clinical subtypes of bipolar mixed states: Validating a broader European definition in 143 cases. Journal of Affective Disorders 1997; 43: 169–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shutzwohl M, Jarosz‐Nowak J, Briscoe J, Szajowski K, Kallert T, Eden Study Group . Inter‐rater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule in a European multi‐site randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day hospitals. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2003; 12(4): 197–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Skinner HA. Construct validation approach to psychiatric classification In Mellon T, and Kleryman GL. (eds) Contemporary Directions in Psychopathology. New York: Guilford, 1979, pp. 307–30. [Google Scholar]
  26. Stein LJ, Test MA. The Training in Community Living Model: a Decade of Experience. New Directions for Mental Health Services series, no. 26. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  27. Swann AC, Secunda SK, Katz MM, Croughan J, Bowden CL, Koslow SH, Berman N, Stokes PE. Specificity of mixed affective states: clinical comparison of dysphoric mania and agitated depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 1993; 28: 81–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Trusty ML, Burger GK, Calsyn RJ, Klinkenberg WD, Morse GA. Generalizability of the scales of the original and expanded versions of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1996; 6: 195–201. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES