Skip to main content
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Mar 24;13(1):34–39. doi: 10.1002/mpr.162

Screening for personality disorder: a comparison of personality disorder assessment by patients and informants

Paul Walters 1,, Paul Moran 1, Partha Choudhury 2, Tennyson Lee 1, Anthony Mann 3
PMCID: PMC6878308  PMID: 15181485

Abstract

The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Personality Disorders (SCID‐II Version 2.0) is becoming the most favoured instrument to measure personality disorder but takes up to an hour to complete. The Standardized Assessment of Personality (SAP), an informant‐based measure, takes 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Both instruments have been validated independently. This study aimed to determine whether the SAP is a suitable screening instrument for personality disorder as measured by the SCID‐II.

Fifty‐seven psychiatric patients were assessed for personality disorder using both the SAP and the SCID‐II. The SAP assessments were conducted blind to the results of the SCID‐II assessments.

Agreement between the two instruments in this population was low (kappa = 0.3). The level of agreement differed between personality disorder categories, ranging from kappa = 0.4 (antisocial) to −0.1 (narcissistic).

In this population of patients, the SAP proved to be a poor screen for the SCID‐II. The study highlights the discrepancy between informant and self‐report assessments for personality disorder. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Keywords: personality disorder, screening

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.6 KB).

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooner RK, King VL, Kidorf M, Schmidt CW, Jr. , Bigelow GE. Psychiatric and substance use comorbidity among treatment‐seeking opioid abusers. Archives of General Psychiatry 1997; 54: 71–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dreessen L, Hildebrand M, Arntz A. Patient‐informant concordance on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐III‐R personality disorders (SCID‐II). Journal of Personality Disorders 1998; 12: 149–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Benjamin LS. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis II Personality Disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  6. Harris EC, Barraclough B. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders. A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 1997; 170: 205–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodgins S, Mednick SA, Brennan PA, Schulsinger F, Engberg M. Mental disorder and crime. Evidence from a Danish birth cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry 1996; 53: 489–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loranger AW, Sartorius N, Andreoli A, Berger P, Buchheim P, Channabasavanna SM, Coid B, Dahl A, Diekstra RF, Ferguson B. The International Personality Disorder Examination. The World Health Organization/Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration international pilot study of personality disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 1994; 51: 215–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maffei C, Fossati A, Agostoni I, Barraco A, Bagnato M, Deborah D, Namia C, Novella L, Petrachi M. Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM‐IV axis II personality disorders (SCID‐II), version 2.0. Journal of Personality Disorders 1997; 11: 279–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mann AH, Jenkins R, Cutting JC, Cowen PJ. The development and use of a standardized assessment of abnormal personality. Psychol Med 1981; 11: 839–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mann AH, Raven P, Pilgrim J, Khanna S, Velayudham A, Suresh KP, Channabasavanna SM, Janca A, Sartorius N. An assessment of the Standardized Assessment of Personality as a screening instrument for the International Personality Disorder Examination: a comparison of informant and patient assessment for personality disorder. Psychol Med 1999; 29: 985–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKeon J, Roa B, Mann A. Life events and personality traits in obsessive‐compulsive neurosis. Br J Psychiatry 1984; 144: 185–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mellsop G, Varghese F, Joshua S, Hicks A. The reliability of axis II of DSM‐III. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1360–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Modestin J, Puhan A. Comparison of assessment of personality disorder by patients and informants. Psychopathology 2000; 33: 265–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mulder RT. Personality pathology and treatment outcome in major depression: a review. American Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 159: 359–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ormel J, Oldehinkel T, Brilman E, Brink WV. Outcome of Depression and Anxiety in Primary Care: A Three‐Wave 3 1/2‐Year Study of Psychopathology and Disability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 759–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Perry JC. Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149: 1645–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pilgrim J, Mellers JD, Boothby H, Mann AH. Inter‐rater and temporal reliability of the Standardized Assessment of Personality and the influence of informant characteristics. Psychol Med 1993; 23: 779–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Poling J, Rounsaville BJ, Ball S, Tennen H, Kranzler HR, Triffleman E. Rates of personality disorders in substance abusers: a comparison between DSM‐III‐R and DSM IV. Journal of Personality Disorders 1999; 13: 375–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rendu A, Moran P, Patel A, Knapp M, Mann A. Economic impact of personality disorders in UK primary care attenders. British Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 181: 62–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Samuels J, Eaton WW, Bienvenu OJ, Brown C, Costa PTJ, Nestadt G. Prevalence and correlates of personality disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180: 536–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tyrer P. Are personality disorders well classified in DSM IV? In Livesley WJ. (ed.) The DSM‐IV Personality Disorders. New York: Guilford Press, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tyrer P, Cicchetti DV, Casey PR, Fitzpatrick K, Oliver R, Balter A, Giller E, Harkness L. Cross‐national reliability study of a schedule for assessing personality disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1984; 172: 718–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Chauncey DL, Gunderson JG. The diagnostic Interview for Personality Disorders: interrater and test‐retest reliability. Comprehensive Psychiatry 1987; 28: 467–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zimmerman M. Diagnosing personality disorders. A review of issues and research methods. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 225–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES