Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2010 Jul 19;19(3):177–184. doi: 10.1002/mpr.319

ADHD in a representative sample of the Brazilian population: estimated prevalence and comparative adequacy of criteria between adolescents and adults according to the item response theory

Guilherme Polanczyk 1,2, Ronaldo Laranjeira 3,4, Marcos Zaleski 4,5, Ilana Pinsky 3,4, Raul Caetano 6, Luis Augusto Rohde 2,7,✉
PMCID: PMC6878319  PMID: 20645293

Abstract

Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a clinically significant disorder in adulthood, but current diagnostic criteria and instruments do not seem to adequately capture the complexity of the disorder in this developmental phase. Accordingly, there are limited data on the proportion of adults affected by the disorder, specially in developing countries.

Method: We assessed a representative household sample of the Brazilian population for ADHD with the Adult ADHD Self‐report Scale (ASRS) Screener, and evaluated the instrument according to the Rasch model of item response theory.

Results: The sample was comprised by 3007 individuals, and the overal prevalence of positive screeners for ADHD was 5.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8–7.0]. Rasch analyses revealed the misfitt of the overall sample to expectations of the model. The evaluation of the sample stratified by age revealed that data for adolescents showed a signficant fittnes to the model expectations, while items completed by adults were not adequated.

Conclusions: The lack of fitness to the model for adult respondents challenges the possibility of a linear transformation of the ordinal data into interval measures and the utilization of parametric analyses of data. This result suggests that diagnostic criteria and instruments for adult ADHD must take into account a developmental perspective. Moreover, it calls for further evaluation of currently employed research methods in light of modern theories of psychometrics. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder, WHO ASRS screener, adult, prevalence, epidemiology

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (94.1 KB).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Marcos Sanches and Eduardo Chachamovich for their valuable contributions to this study.

References

  1. Andrich D. (1988) Rasch Models for Measurement, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown T.E. (2006) Toward an adequate understanding of attention deficit disorders. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 28, 261–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chachamovich E., Fleck M., Trentini C.M., Power M. (2008) The Brazilian WHOQOL‐OLD Module version: a Rasch analysis of a new measure. Revista de Saúde Pública, 42, 308–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. de Graaf R., Kessler R.C., Fayyad J., Ten Have M., Alonso J., Angermeyer M., Borges G., Demyttenaere K., Gasquet I., de Girolamo G., Haro J.M., Jin R., Karam E.G., Ormel J., Posada‐Villa J. (2008) The prevalence and effects of Adult Attention‐Deficit/hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) on the performance of workers: results from the WHO World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65, 835–842. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.038448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faraone S.V., Biederman J. (2005) What is the prevalence of adult ADHD? Results of a population screen of 966 adults. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 384–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fayyad J., De Graaf R., Kessler R., Alonso J., Angermeyer M., Demyttenaere K., De Girolamo G., Haro J.M., Karam E.G., Lara C., Lepine J.P., Ormel J., Posada‐Villa J., Zaslavsky A.M., Jin R. (2007) Cross‐national prevalence and correlates of adult attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 402–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gomez R. (2008) Item response theory analyses of the parent and teacher ratings of the DSM‐IV ADHD rating scale. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 865–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartman C.A., Gelhorn H., Crowley T.J., Sakai J.T., Stallings M., Young S.E., Rhee S.H., Corley R., Hewitt J.K., Hopfer C.J. (2008) Item response theory analysis of DSM‐IV cannabis abuse and dependence criteria in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 165–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ietsugu T., Sukigara M., Furukawa T.A. (2007) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for panic attack using item response theory: findings from the National Comorbidity Survey in USA. Journal of Affective Disorders, 104, 197–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kessler R.C., Adler L., Ames M., Demler O., Faraone S., Hiripi E., Howes M.J., Jin R., Secnik K., Spencer T., Ustun T.B., Walters E.E. (2005) The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 35, 245–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kessler R.C., Adler L., Barkley R., Biederman J., Conners C.K., Demler O., Faraone S.V., Greenhill L.L., Howes M.J., Secnik K., Spencer T., Ustun T.B., Walters E.E., Zaslavsky A.M. (2006) The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 716–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kessler R.C., Adler L.A., Gruber M.J., Sarawate C.A., Spencer T., Van Brunt D.L. (2007) Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16, 52–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kooij J.J., Buitelaar J.K., van den Oord E.J., Furer J.W., Rijnders C.A., Hodiamont P.P. (2005) Internal and external validity of attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder in a population‐based sample of adults. Psychological Medicine, 35, 817–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McGough J.J., Barkley R.A. (2004) Diagnostic controversies in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1948–1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Merrell C., Tymms P. (2005) Rasch analysis of inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive behaviour in young children and the link with academic achievement. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 1–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pallant J.F., Tennant A. (2007) An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pechansky F., De Boni R., Diemen L.V., Bumaguin D., Pinsky I., Zaleski M., Caetano R., Laranjeira R. (2009) Highly reported prevalence of drinking and driving in Brazil: data from the first representative household study. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 31, 125–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pliszka S. (2007) Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 894–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Polanczyk G., Lima M.S., Horta B.L., Biederman J., Rohde L.A. (2007) The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 942–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Polanczyk G., Rohde L.A. (2007) Epidemiology of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20, 386–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rasch G. (1960) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rohde L.A. (2008) Is there a need to reformulate attention deficit hyperactivity disorder criteria in future nosologic classifications? Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 17, 405–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rutter M. (2006) Pesquisa de mercado, Ática. [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith E.V.J., Johnson B.D. (2000) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: scaling and standard setting using Rasch measurement. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 3–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tennant A., Penta M., Tesio L., Grimby G., Thonnard J.L., Slade A., Lawton G., Simone A., Carter J., Lundgren‐Nilsson A., Tripolski M., Ring H., Biering‐Sorensen F., Marincek C., Burger H., Phillips S. (2004) Assessing and adjusting for cross‐cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO‐ESOR project. Medical Care, 42, I37–I48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilens T.E., Faraone S.V., Biederman J. (2004) Attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 619–623.15292088 [Google Scholar]
  27. Willoughby M.T. (2003) Developmental course of ADHD symptomatology during the transition from childhood to adolescence: a review with recommendations. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 88–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES