Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Mar 24;12(4):167–181. doi: 10.1002/mpr.154

The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI‐AUTO): problems and remedies for diagnosing panic disorder and social phobia

Adrienne Means‐Christensen 1,✉, Cathy D Sherbourne 2, Peter Roy‐Byrne 3, Michelle G Craske 4, Alexander Bystritsky 4, Murray B Stein 1
PMCID: PMC6878399  PMID: 14657973

Abstract

In a recent study of treatment for panic disorder in primary care, the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI‐Auto) was used to provide psychiatric diagnoses. However, during and after data collection, it was discovered that the CIDI appeared to place, or fail to place, a substantial number of people into diagnostic categories in ways that conflicted with the investigators' clinical experience. The wording of questions in the panic module, coupled with a lack of structured follow‐up probes, resulted in apparent false negatives for panic disorder. Moreover, patients who would otherwise meet criteria for panic disorder or social phobia did not receive a diagnosis based on rules that may be discordant with clinical practice and, at times, the design of the DSM‐IV.

For this study, changes were made to the interview, including additional probes for the panic disorder module and modification of the decision rules used to assign or rule out diagnoses of panic disorder and social phobia. The changes resulted in greater inclusion of patients in the panic disorder and social phobia diagnostic categories and we argue that these changes to the CIDI‐Auto increase the clinical validity of this instrument. We did not examine the false positive rate for the unmodified or modified CIDI, but this is an important issue that needs to be evaluated in future research. Copyright © 2003 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Keywords: Composite International Diagnostic Interview, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, structured diagnostic interview

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (112.5 KB).

References

  1. Andersch SEO, Hanson, LCF . Comorbidity of panic disorder and social phobia. Eur J Psychiatry 1993; 7: 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews G, Peters L. The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1998; 33: 80–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ball SG, Otto MW, Pollack MH, Uccello R, Rosenbaum JF. Differentiating social phobia and panic disorder: a test of core beliefs. Cog Ther Res 1995; 19: 473–82. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brugha TS, Jenkins R, Taub N, Meltzer H, Bebbington PE. A general population comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). Psychol Med 2001; 31: 1001–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conner KM, Davidson JR, Churchill LE, Sherwood A, Foa E, Weisler RH. Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN)‐New self‐rating scale. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 176: 379–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gelernter, CS , Stein, MB , Tancer, ME , Uhde, TW . An examination of syndromal validity and diagnostic subtypes in social phobia and panic disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1992; 53: 23–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayward C, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Taylor CB. Predictors of panic attacks in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000; 39: 207–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hazlett‐Stevens H, Craske M G, Roy‐Byrne PP, Sherbourne C D, Stein MB, Bystritsky A. Predictors of willingness to consider medication and psychosocial treatment for panic disorder in primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2002; 24: 316–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Komiti AA, Jackson HJ, Judd FK, Cockram AM, Kyrios M, Yeatman R, Murray G, Hordern C, Wainwright K, Allen N, Singh B. A comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI‐Auto) with clinical assessment in diagnosing mood and anxiety disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 35: 224–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peters L, Andrews G. Procedural validity of the computerized version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI‐Auto) in the anxiety disorders. Psychol Med 1995; 25: 1269–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Peters L, Clark D, Carroll F. Are computerized interviews equivalent to human interviewers? CIDI‐Auto versus CIDI in anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 893–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peters L, Slade T, Cooper L. DSM‐IV scorer for CIDI 2.1 (SPSS Syntax File). Sydney, Australia: World Health Organization, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  13. Peterson RA, Reiss S. Anxiety Sensitivity Index Manual. Palos Heights IL: International Diagnostic Systems, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenman SJ, Korten AE, Levings CT. Computerised diagnosis in acute psychiatry: validity of CIDI‐Auto against routine clinical diagnosis. J Psychiatric Res 1997; 31: 581–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roy‐Byrne PP, Sherbourne CD, Craske MG, Stein MB, Katon W, Sullivan G, Means‐Christensen A, Bystrisky A. Moving treatment research from clinical trials to the real world. Psychiatric Serv 2003; 54: 327–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmidt NB, Lerew DR, Jackson RJ. The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. J Abnormal Psychology 1997; 106: 355–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shear MK, Brown TA, Barlow DH, Money R, Sholomskas DE, Woods SW. Multicenter collaborative Panic Disorder Severity Scale. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154: 1571–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shear MK, Feske U, Brown C, Clark DB, Mammen O, Scotti J. Anxiety disorders measures In American Psychiatric Association ed. Handbook of Psychiatric Measures. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wing JK, Babor T, Brugha T, Burke J, Cooper JE, Giel R, Jablenski A, Regier D, Sartorius N. SCAN. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47: 589–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wittchen H‐U. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO‐Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatric Res 1994; 28: 57–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. World Health Organization . CIDI‐Auto, Version 2.1: Administrator's Guide. Sydney, Australia: World Health Organization, 1997a. [Google Scholar]
  22. World Health Organization . Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Core Version 2.1: Interviewer's Manual. Sydney, Australia: World Health Organization, 1997b. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES